The Sukhoi must be the most rakishly best looking fighter plane in service today. But I dislike how far back the forward Landing Gear is located, it makes the machine ungainly, nose-heavy and unstable when taxying. I also like the elegant raised Bow of the Ship.
September 5, 2010 died legendary pilot - Hero of Russia Sergey Melnikov. He was a pilot who had taught take off and land on the deck of aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov "Su-33. The first in Russia carried out 100 and 200 landings on the deck of an aircraft carrier. The experience gained from the tests, further allowed him to develop a methodology and to train front-line pilots the ship's 279 Fighter Regiment technique of landing on an aircraft carrier deck. He was only 51 years.
lol i wish i were born in Russia...lol sadly Canada has no damn carriers. Lol i love the russian navy more than teh US though the hornets have to be 2nd most sexiest thing on this planet LOL. Anyways lol nice video i've been tryna ffind this so long!
Really?Looks like you have never served in the Russian Federation Navy)))) Pointless to talk to you because you are too disinformed to change your mind
Take a look at the size of the U.S. Navy compared to the russian navy and you will know what I am talking about. Also if it was pointless to talk to me then why did you send me a message?
Koz,my imperialist enemy,koz i was just curious about how many swear words you will have in your message)))I expected 2 at least.Bravo,you had none)Looks like there IS some culture people left in the west.Now,about the navy))Size now nesessary means quality if you can understand my english ;-)
Well,as I said,size doesn't mean anything.Now,about power.Your carriers can't go out in the sea by itself,it has to have a huge tactical group with it.
Please, your wasting my time, we have better technology, you guys have some outdated carriers and missiles. Our navy is ranked number 1, end of story.
But you are still responding to me)))That means,that you feel that you are wrong)))Your navy is ranked the first one by the west,who obviosly will vote for you in everything,koz they are too damn scared to openly show you on your place.Sorry,but your navy is the first in the west inly,and only west is accepting it.Nobody said that it is the strongest in the world)
su-33 make carrier landing look very easy. no afterburer to do go arround, no landing officer to guide it to land. i guess F-18 cannot land on russian carrier but su-33 can land on any american carrier without assistance from landing officer. thanks to powerfull engine and low stall speed
U.S. Carrier ops are still a lot more efficient than Russian Carrier ops although they have a better naval aircraft. However, the F-35 promises to be a great carrier aircraft as it has great STOVL capability.
Thats true and why it is? Because Russian carier was designed to provide air defense cover for the fleet ships while the american ones were designed mainly for support of invading army. Practical difference between this is in the number of aircrafts carried and possible parallel maintenance service of onboard aircrafts. Kuznetsov have far less onboard aircrafts than Nimitz class or Enterprise. Its about world politics. Russia wants only to defend itself while USA wants enforce its politics!
@swertinge07 let me correct you: *buying five helicopter support ships from France. It means these ships can support landing operations, as they can house helicopters for naval operations like antisubmarine warfare, search and rescue and pinpointing enemy warships over the horizont. Aren't those a defensive roles?
@swertinge07 Please read Russian naval doctrine. You will find out that Russian Naval infantry have shock troops doctrine to support major military operations by regular land forces. This is by no means to support a large landing operation that US Navy is capable of to project its force on global scale. Now thats what i call a differrence.... a very much defensive doctrine compared to offensive one.
@Flankymanga First of all, my Russian sucks, but if you PM me an English translation I will be happy to read it. Secondly, the ship carries up to four landing ships and has a dock. Third, what Russia do in the southern parts are defending itself? Well, the US defends it self in Iraq and Afghanistan so why can´t Russia defend itself in Georgia and other parts down south?
@swertinge07 first you can read about their doctrine on wikipedia in english, secondly there are many ships that carries a dock and are not considered landing ships. What Russia do in southern parts like Georgia is truly defending its citizens (South Ossethians with Russian passports) compared to America in Iraq where not a single American was attacked by Hussein. Try to read more about politics and if possibly not from the mainstream media...
@Flankymanga You are of course free to believe what you want... Oh, no, you are not. if you go against official propaganda you end up in prison or like Anna Politkovskaja. I study at national defence college, so I don´t put much stock in mainstream media, nor your fairy tales...
@swertinge07 ah i understand so you get in touch with fresh propaganda first hand.... I bet you believe the invasion of Iraq was "the right choice" because saddam either had chemical weapons or sheltered terrorists right? The people you are learning from present you education material with altered reality... no wonder youre missing crucial information about your enemy.
Actually, I don´t agree with the invasion on Iraq or US policy of "extended" self defence. Nor do I agree with Russia fighting Georgia and notrhern Caucasus. When I did military service we always fought against "enemy RED" and he came across the Baltic sea in Pomornik and Il-76... And now he is back, but this time he wants to come in Mistral he bought from France.
@swertinge07 and this is where you are wrong. They wants to come with Mistral? Why would they threaten Scandinavia? Why would they threaten their energy customers at all? You have old cold war mentality. In Georgia Georgian president massacred innocent civilians. EU report is all about it.... Russian intervention was appropriate because Russian peacekeeping troops were attacked and some of them were killed. They had the utmost right to defend their people.
@swertinge07 and one more thing. Have you ever wondered why France sold Mistral to Russia? France would have not collapsed without the money they have gained from this deal. The main reason was because they dont see Russia as enemy. Neither Germany which was willing to sell Opel to Sberbank and neither Italy which is cooperation with Russia in car and aeronautic industry. Wake up the cold war is long gone. Only USA wants everyeone to see Russia as big bad red commies.
@Flankymanga eee err not really. If the USSR had a bigger budget it would've built carriers like the Nimitz class. Unfortunately by the time they were in the carrier race the US was way ahead. Thus pirority was focused on protecting the immediate fleet and important bases. Both the USSR and the USA enforced their politics during the Cold War era, but as history shows enforcing one's politics on another is costly and a really true waste of resources unless you're trying to help/protect.
Hey, that dude on the observation deck who is freezing his ass off, it appears he is constipated or something, cause is face is not happy. Or he is ready to DEFECT like that Lt. who brought the Mig 25 to US in Japan in 1976, HaHaHa! LOL Russian stupid AF, is nothing but a pile of old junk... No need to reply, I know your Russian stupidity; feeling pride being lost?
no, he is feeling sorry for americans who've lost so many top secrets to Russia (including nuclear bomb design) he is like "those yankees r retarded! they spend billions on military developments only to give them away to us. those hard working americans who are so heavily taxed to pay for all these stuff only to give them away to us. oh, i feel sorry for american taxpayers" that's what he is thinking. good job, americans! keep working hard!
Heavy taxed americans? Man, you are not only playing stupid, YOU ARE STUPID! I am not going to educate you, but we are a lot less taxed than all Europeans, sir! We are taxing the foreign companies a lot, indeed!
You are confusing Russia with Red China. US lost many secrets to China recently, to USSR too, but mainly controlled misinformation by the FBI. Anyway, the dude on the observation deck is constipated or sorry for something, watch his facial expression and you'll understand. I think he found out last night his manhood is fading away, the male hooker must have go unsatisfied. No bad fillings, bye now, Comrade
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Oh, yes, Mother Russia, seems like the 80's all over again. What is this you are showing, 1980 Air Force? You gays have nothing newer? I meant, this propaganda may be good for Iran and red China, but you won't impress even Romania, let alone USA!
Yes, Romania invaded Russia in 1941 and advanced to Odessa; then Hitler requested Romanian Army to halt invasion, otherwise they would march to Moskva. Read the history (not what your Russian books are hidding). Also, Romania did not join the USSR in invading Czec/Slovakia but Brejnev was too afraid to invade Romania too. Later, it developed an alliance with Yugoslavia AGAINST USSR.
Indeed, HISTORY, my Russian Comrade, makes you do what? Kirilltraceur:"haha make me laugh haha" Your response shows your lack of education, Russian IVAN, cause you were stupid and you will be stupid. Oh, BTW, is there a large US presence in Romania now, is Romania NATO today, and Putin scared shitless of what Romania will do? I guess you will say: HAHA make me cry haha
Why do Russian pilots where that orange uniform, I mean they are combat pilots at least something greenish, they look like astronauts. I like the Su-33 alot, no question about it, maybe the paint:)
Because they are NAVY pilots and this heavy suit can protect them for several hours from cold water in case of ejection. And the orange color is more contrasting with blue/grey water then green or grey so it´s better chance to find them :-)
Russian stuff is designed to be simple and cheap. But it concerns me that with their new found oil wealth, Russia will be making more aircraft carriers, the purpose of which is to project Russian influence. The Cold War ain't over. They are moving from a defensive posture to an offensive posture.
russia must protect its interests. it has no claims on any lands aside from those that already comprise russian federation. russia defeated two of the greatest military empires of the modern history. If russia really wanted to be offensive and grab something, it wouldn't let anything go on the first place. Russia is least offensive motivated now than ever. But Russia is lerning how to protect it's legitimate interests. Russians r very pragmatic now, and that won't change. nothing wrong w it
MOron, Russia ALWAYS try to grab everythig, this is why is now falling apart and more and more countries (old republics) are spliting and gets the independence, then they turn against Mother Russia and allies with the WEST! Do you need me to list all these countries? I bet not, cause your Russian stupid pride. Go suck the Pitot Tube on a F22 Raptor!
repeating for all homosexuals - if russia wanted those lands and countries as bad as you guys try to portray, it wouldn't let them go on the first place. russia only cares about those countries as a buffer against your moronic europeans who once in a while have a dictator who wants to attack russia. and the new european dictator is USofA.
History 101: Yes, Romania invaded Russia in 1941 and advanced to Odessa; then Hitler requested Romanian Army to halt invasion, otherwise they would march to Moskva. Read the history (not what your Russian books are hidding). Also, Romania did not join the USSR in invading Czec/Slovakia but Brejnev was too afraid to invade Romania too. Later, it developed an alliance with Yugoslavia AGAINST USSR
Fact: When an Aircraft Carrier uses a Sky jump; in order for the aircraft to effectivly get access into the air it takes up too much deck space. And what kind of G's does the Pilot take? Great Brittan's Oceanic has a Sky Jump too, but will never meet the same Firepower as a Nimitz class or the new Ford class. Still very amazing Video!! glad to see another country's might ^.^
I hope new Russian carriers will be bigger then Kuznetsov
xsf908 1 month ago
The Sukhoi must be the most rakishly best looking fighter plane in service today. But I dislike how far back the forward Landing Gear is located, it makes the machine ungainly, nose-heavy and unstable when taxying. I also like the elegant raised Bow of the Ship.
Stinkinini 10 months ago
don't be fooled guys, the Su-33 is quite a bit bigger than the F-18 hornet so it kinda makes this awesome carrier look small
Ahamster1 1 year ago
Why do ALL ships have water coming from them on the sides?
TonyFirelli 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
September 5, 2010 died legendary pilot - Hero of Russia Sergey Melnikov. He was a pilot who had taught take off and land on the deck of aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov "Su-33. The first in Russia carried out 100 and 200 landings on the deck of an aircraft carrier. The experience gained from the tests, further allowed him to develop a methodology and to train front-line pilots the ship's 279 Fighter Regiment technique of landing on an aircraft carrier deck. He was only 51 years.
Bugel852 1 year ago
Bad marshalling! He made the pilot stop before it should beacause of it !
Meirele 1 year ago
Russian NAVY pilots best of the best :P
WMuckaMW 1 year ago
what good are all these planes and the carrier if the planes don't carry any air to air missiles, there all empty.
Psycolynch 1 year ago
Russia doesn't have large navy as US it's because Russia doesn't invade countries like US does all the time...
ArmAFan 1 year ago
lol i wish i were born in Russia...lol sadly Canada has no damn carriers. Lol i love the russian navy more than teh US though the hornets have to be 2nd most sexiest thing on this planet LOL. Anyways lol nice video i've been tryna ffind this so long!
lolermanche 2 years ago
Do they allow beards in the Russian navy?
nawitus 2 years ago
The Russian Navy is weak compared to the United States Navy.
tonygogap 2 years ago
Really?Looks like you have never served in the Russian Federation Navy)))) Pointless to talk to you because you are too disinformed to change your mind
Dony2392 2 years ago
Take a look at the size of the U.S. Navy compared to the russian navy and you will know what I am talking about. Also if it was pointless to talk to me then why did you send me a message?
tonygogap 2 years ago
Koz,my imperialist enemy,koz i was just curious about how many swear words you will have in your message)))I expected 2 at least.Bravo,you had none)Looks like there IS some culture people left in the west.Now,about the navy))Size now nesessary means quality if you can understand my english ;-)
Dony2392 2 years ago
The U.S. has the largest most powerful navy and thats all there is to it.
tonygogap 2 years ago
Well,as I said,size doesn't mean anything.Now,about power.Your carriers can't go out in the sea by itself,it has to have a huge tactical group with it.
Dony2392 2 years ago
.Your cruisers can't deal with the Somalian pirates while our ships over there already have two pirate crews.
Dony2392 2 years ago
No offence but your navy isn't that great as you think it is..we are pretty much equal.
Dony2392 2 years ago
Sorry but you have to face the facts that the U.S. Navy has more planes, ships, and missiles.
tonygogap 2 years ago
Sorry,but size doesn't mean quality =DDDDDD
And by the way,you don't have more missiles,comrade =Ъ
Dony2392 2 years ago
Please, your wasting my time, we have better technology, you guys have some outdated carriers and missiles. Our navy is ranked number 1, end of story.
tonygogap 2 years ago
But you are still responding to me)))That means,that you feel that you are wrong)))Your navy is ranked the first one by the west,who obviosly will vote for you in everything,koz they are too damn scared to openly show you on your place.Sorry,but your navy is the first in the west inly,and only west is accepting it.Nobody said that it is the strongest in the world)
Dony2392 2 years ago
Que dificil es aterrizar en un portaaviones
ruzlanz 3 years ago 4
Excellent video good job done.
NUSRPKINA 3 years ago 3
fantastick video well done
su27forserbia 3 years ago 3
su-33 make carrier landing look very easy. no afterburer to do go arround, no landing officer to guide it to land. i guess F-18 cannot land on russian carrier but su-33 can land on any american carrier without assistance from landing officer. thanks to powerfull engine and low stall speed
wyunaboy 3 years ago 2
U.S. Carrier ops are still a lot more efficient than Russian Carrier ops although they have a better naval aircraft. However, the F-35 promises to be a great carrier aircraft as it has great STOVL capability.
jolupapi 3 years ago
Thats true and why it is? Because Russian carier was designed to provide air defense cover for the fleet ships while the american ones were designed mainly for support of invading army. Practical difference between this is in the number of aircrafts carried and possible parallel maintenance service of onboard aircrafts. Kuznetsov have far less onboard aircrafts than Nimitz class or Enterprise. Its about world politics. Russia wants only to defend itself while USA wants enforce its politics!
Flankymanga 3 years ago 14
@Flankymanga Yes, thzt is why they are buying five landing ships from France.
swertinge07 1 year ago
@swertinge07 let me correct you: *buying five helicopter support ships from France. It means these ships can support landing operations, as they can house helicopters for naval operations like antisubmarine warfare, search and rescue and pinpointing enemy warships over the horizont. Aren't those a defensive roles?
Flankymanga 1 year ago
@Flankymanga
Call them what you want... They are still landingships.
swertinge07 1 year ago
@swertinge07 Please read Russian naval doctrine. You will find out that Russian Naval infantry have shock troops doctrine to support major military operations by regular land forces. This is by no means to support a large landing operation that US Navy is capable of to project its force on global scale. Now thats what i call a differrence.... a very much defensive doctrine compared to offensive one.
Flankymanga 1 year ago
@Flankymanga First of all, my Russian sucks, but if you PM me an English translation I will be happy to read it. Secondly, the ship carries up to four landing ships and has a dock. Third, what Russia do in the southern parts are defending itself? Well, the US defends it self in Iraq and Afghanistan so why can´t Russia defend itself in Georgia and other parts down south?
swertinge07 1 year ago
@swertinge07 first you can read about their doctrine on wikipedia in english, secondly there are many ships that carries a dock and are not considered landing ships. What Russia do in southern parts like Georgia is truly defending its citizens (South Ossethians with Russian passports) compared to America in Iraq where not a single American was attacked by Hussein. Try to read more about politics and if possibly not from the mainstream media...
Flankymanga 1 year ago
@Flankymanga You are of course free to believe what you want... Oh, no, you are not. if you go against official propaganda you end up in prison or like Anna Politkovskaja. I study at national defence college, so I don´t put much stock in mainstream media, nor your fairy tales...
swertinge07 1 year ago
@swertinge07 ah i understand so you get in touch with fresh propaganda first hand.... I bet you believe the invasion of Iraq was "the right choice" because saddam either had chemical weapons or sheltered terrorists right? The people you are learning from present you education material with altered reality... no wonder youre missing crucial information about your enemy.
Flankymanga 1 year ago
@Flankymanga
Actually, I don´t agree with the invasion on Iraq or US policy of "extended" self defence. Nor do I agree with Russia fighting Georgia and notrhern Caucasus. When I did military service we always fought against "enemy RED" and he came across the Baltic sea in Pomornik and Il-76... And now he is back, but this time he wants to come in Mistral he bought from France.
swertinge07 1 year ago
@swertinge07 and this is where you are wrong. They wants to come with Mistral? Why would they threaten Scandinavia? Why would they threaten their energy customers at all? You have old cold war mentality. In Georgia Georgian president massacred innocent civilians. EU report is all about it.... Russian intervention was appropriate because Russian peacekeeping troops were attacked and some of them were killed. They had the utmost right to defend their people.
Flankymanga 1 year ago
@Flankymanga Yes, of course... "Call" me when you and reality are in sync...
swertinge07 1 year ago
@swertinge07 i am... question is: Are you?
Flankymanga 1 year ago
@swertinge07 and one more thing. Have you ever wondered why France sold Mistral to Russia? France would have not collapsed without the money they have gained from this deal. The main reason was because they dont see Russia as enemy. Neither Germany which was willing to sell Opel to Sberbank and neither Italy which is cooperation with Russia in car and aeronautic industry. Wake up the cold war is long gone. Only USA wants everyeone to see Russia as big bad red commies.
Flankymanga 1 year ago
@Flankymanga eee err not really. If the USSR had a bigger budget it would've built carriers like the Nimitz class. Unfortunately by the time they were in the carrier race the US was way ahead. Thus pirority was focused on protecting the immediate fleet and important bases. Both the USSR and the USA enforced their politics during the Cold War era, but as history shows enforcing one's politics on another is costly and a really true waste of resources unless you're trying to help/protect.
Ahamster1 10 months ago
Nice video...nice sound tooo
88a 3 years ago 7
Cool video now this is real original sound
POPWELLMAN 3 years ago 4
Hey, that dude on the observation deck who is freezing his ass off, it appears he is constipated or something, cause is face is not happy. Or he is ready to DEFECT like that Lt. who brought the Mig 25 to US in Japan in 1976, HaHaHa! LOL Russian stupid AF, is nothing but a pile of old junk... No need to reply, I know your Russian stupidity; feeling pride being lost?
autosellers 3 years ago
no, he is feeling sorry for americans who've lost so many top secrets to Russia (including nuclear bomb design) he is like "those yankees r retarded! they spend billions on military developments only to give them away to us. those hard working americans who are so heavily taxed to pay for all these stuff only to give them away to us. oh, i feel sorry for american taxpayers" that's what he is thinking. good job, americans! keep working hard!
ness19dsm 3 years ago
Heavy taxed americans? Man, you are not only playing stupid, YOU ARE STUPID! I am not going to educate you, but we are a lot less taxed than all Europeans, sir! We are taxing the foreign companies a lot, indeed!
autosellers 3 years ago
You are confusing Russia with Red China. US lost many secrets to China recently, to USSR too, but mainly controlled misinformation by the FBI. Anyway, the dude on the observation deck is constipated or sorry for something, watch his facial expression and you'll understand. I think he found out last night his manhood is fading away, the male hooker must have go unsatisfied. No bad fillings, bye now, Comrade
autosellers 3 years ago 2
you can't even spell in your own language and your call me stupid?
no bad FILLINGS hahaha
go see a dentist, moron
ness19dsm 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh, yes, Mother Russia, seems like the 80's all over again. What is this you are showing, 1980 Air Force? You gays have nothing newer? I meant, this propaganda may be good for Iran and red China, but you won't impress even Romania, let alone USA!
autosellers 4 years ago
great video..great planes! God Bless Russia!
madedd02 4 years ago 2
Romania is a country???? phf- doubt it
Kirilltraceur 3 years ago
Yes, Romania invaded Russia in 1941 and advanced to Odessa; then Hitler requested Romanian Army to halt invasion, otherwise they would march to Moskva. Read the history (not what your Russian books are hidding). Also, Romania did not join the USSR in invading Czec/Slovakia but Brejnev was too afraid to invade Romania too. Later, it developed an alliance with Yugoslavia AGAINST USSR.
autosellers 3 years ago
haha make me laugh haha
Kirilltraceur 3 years ago
Indeed, HISTORY, my Russian Comrade, makes you do what? Kirilltraceur:"haha make me laugh haha" Your response shows your lack of education, Russian IVAN, cause you were stupid and you will be stupid. Oh, BTW, is there a large US presence in Romania now, is Romania NATO today, and Putin scared shitless of what Romania will do? I guess you will say: HAHA make me cry haha
autosellers 3 years ago
Why do Russian pilots where that orange uniform, I mean they are combat pilots at least something greenish, they look like astronauts. I like the Su-33 alot, no question about it, maybe the paint:)
Ersp84 4 years ago
Because they are NAVY pilots and this heavy suit can protect them for several hours from cold water in case of ejection. And the orange color is more contrasting with blue/grey water then green or grey so it´s better chance to find them :-)
DMazos 4 years ago 8
that makes sense
ness19dsm 3 years ago
Clowns
autosellers 4 years ago
Cause they are clowns
autosellers 3 years ago
@Ersp84 hey yo c'mon look on the...bright side, the orange suits make them look like the Rebel pilots from Star Wars haha!
Ahamster1 1 year ago
bueen video
josetiburon2007 4 years ago
Wow amazing video DMazos! That was very impressive!
LH164 4 years ago
Russian stuff is designed to be simple and cheap. But it concerns me that with their new found oil wealth, Russia will be making more aircraft carriers, the purpose of which is to project Russian influence. The Cold War ain't over. They are moving from a defensive posture to an offensive posture.
myndenway 4 years ago 3
russia must protect its interests. it has no claims on any lands aside from those that already comprise russian federation. russia defeated two of the greatest military empires of the modern history. If russia really wanted to be offensive and grab something, it wouldn't let anything go on the first place. Russia is least offensive motivated now than ever. But Russia is lerning how to protect it's legitimate interests. Russians r very pragmatic now, and that won't change. nothing wrong w it
ness19dsm 3 years ago 3
MOron, Russia ALWAYS try to grab everythig, this is why is now falling apart and more and more countries (old republics) are spliting and gets the independence, then they turn against Mother Russia and allies with the WEST! Do you need me to list all these countries? I bet not, cause your Russian stupid pride. Go suck the Pitot Tube on a F22 Raptor!
autosellers 3 years ago
you are obviously a retard.
repeating for all homosexuals - if russia wanted those lands and countries as bad as you guys try to portray, it wouldn't let them go on the first place. russia only cares about those countries as a buffer against your moronic europeans who once in a while have a dictator who wants to attack russia. and the new european dictator is USofA.
try flying ur Craptor against S400, fagot
ness19dsm 3 years ago
History 101: Yes, Romania invaded Russia in 1941 and advanced to Odessa; then Hitler requested Romanian Army to halt invasion, otherwise they would march to Moskva. Read the history (not what your Russian books are hidding). Also, Romania did not join the USSR in invading Czec/Slovakia but Brejnev was too afraid to invade Romania too. Later, it developed an alliance with Yugoslavia AGAINST USSR
autosellers 3 years ago
be quite then and don't piss them off!
fabrix7777 3 years ago
I meant Kuznetsov...
Iluvatar010 4 years ago
More engine NOISE baby!!!!!!
mira98 4 years ago
Definately quieter than a Nimtz Class!
Also Wheres the Catapults?! O.o
This ABE2 is very Curious =D
BattleBornJackalope 4 years ago
the catapults?
There is skijump ramp on flying deck, no need the catapults.
mira98 4 years ago
No catapults on the Juznetsov dude
Iluvatar010 4 years ago
Admiral kuznetsov Is not use Catapult.They use Sky Jump To replace Catapult
kiraparno 4 years ago
Fact: When an Aircraft Carrier uses a Sky jump; in order for the aircraft to effectivly get access into the air it takes up too much deck space. And what kind of G's does the Pilot take? Great Brittan's Oceanic has a Sky Jump too, but will never meet the same Firepower as a Nimitz class or the new Ford class. Still very amazing Video!! glad to see another country's might ^.^
BattleBornJackalope 4 years ago
nice video , I would like to have those airplanes in our mexican air force or navy , those are naval air force aircraft isn't that truth?
parodro 4 years ago
Wetback, shut the pipe off and crawl under the border fence, PEDRO Beaner
autosellers 3 years ago
??? you are a stereotypical American idiot Im at lest not a stereotypical one.... hahaha
Kirilltraceur 3 years ago
Stereotypical (!?) yes, idiot, no! The only idiot here is the Russian IVAN, Kirilltraceur
autosellers 3 years ago
cool 5 stars
kierownik 4 years ago
very nice !
redrocker72 4 years ago
No, this is the same case as my Mi-6 video - I found it on net
DMazos 4 years ago
Ok, please next time, use the reply button, because i dont know that you have replied unless you use the "Reply" button ;D
ComradeLynx 4 years ago
Filmed by you? Awesome vid BTW, very rare find
ComradeLynx 4 years ago
che figata di video!!!!BELLISSIMO!!!
Ghostrideritaly 4 years ago