Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (86)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Way to give honest answers, Frank........What are your qualifications, Frank????

  • If you are young and not liberal you have no heart and if you are older and not conservative you have no brains

  • good video

    barney frank is not approachable

    hes too busy dont even bother with him. he doesnt care about that stuff. ask him a better question that gets him to stop next time.

    For instance: What does he want for christmas, a blunt or a prostitute?

    Get him angry with you first, you have to agitate people these days to get a rise out of them, then hone in, that was not an argument, you need to get into arguments and raise a stink.

    sorry if thats what you dont want to hear

  • WeAreChangeBoston: dresteban is a govt liar. they are everywhere and their main purpose is to refute the truth. The main truth theyre refuting is that chemtrails are being sprayed every day globally ti hide the great destruction coming in the sky that NASA announced they found in 1983, then lied about. This is also the sign in the heavens warning of the destruction of America by the SCO. details are on my channel. Keep up the good work.

  • Barney needs to be shot. What a fuckin joke!

  • I think he stated over 4 times during the span of time at the meeting, something pertaining to not being able to have a conversation with people, for one reason or another. Mark never mentioned Bush, Barney did.

  • Great job Mark!

  • Maybe if you were a naked little boy in his Georgetown brothel he would listen.

  • Make no mistake, Barney Frank is a traitor, and you can rest assured he knows 9-11 was a staged attack.

  • Barney and the rest of them should be more careful, one day somebody's just gonna snap and that'll be that. What with all the controvorsy over obamacare getting out of control I'm expecting to see something interesting.

  • democrats = republicans. Got to love republicrats, and the people who are devout believers in their political religion.

    frank is a fudge packing stooge (No offense to gay people).

  • With this and ripping on idiots over Health Care, Barney Frank has become my hero.

  • Your hero is an accused pedophile.

  • He looks like he's suffering from too much blood in his alcohol stream.

  • There is more than enough evidence to warrant a few more investigations from various third parties and other bodies, both government-controlled and skeptical. I have seen the government lie about Korea, the 1953 Iranian coup, Cuba Missiles Crisis, JFK, Vietnam/Gulf of Tonkin, Kuwaiti Incubators and babies, Cointel Pro, RFK, MLK, Iraqi War, Georgia-South Ossetia, Iran nukes, and now the phony Swine/Human/Bird flu scam. Many more people died from those lies than 9/11. Watch the movie "They Live".

  • please formulate your questions a little better.. Geez man, you sound totally unprepared.

  • Who says the government lied? Maybe they did, but all I'm saying is that there is evidence which government reports to date are ignoring and/or not reporting. That's why we need a new investigation! Why oppose a new impartial investigation? I just don't see why not if there's nothing to hide.

  • " qradqrad says:

    That's why we need a new investigation! Why oppose a new impartial investigation?"

    I agree. But not the "Pharmaceuticals investigating herbs" or "Cell Phone companies investigating brain tumors". The problem is that somebody is hiding something, and a government investigation will tell half-truths at best. The amount of debris hitting WTC, as small as it was, would not bring a building straight down as would in a controlled demolition.

  • There actually never was an investigation in real time.  The only 'investigation' came after the clean-up -after the evidence was compromised.

    some evidence, such as the computer hard drives that were recovered, were destroyed intentionally.

  • Peer reviewed is peer reviewed. You can commit fraud or libel against the journal's publisher, but the facts will not change. To attempt to ignore these facts is dishonest and treasonous.

  • So a government can lie, but websites never do?

    I ask you again, how can a journal be genuinely peer reviewed and still publish a made up article?

    By ignoring facts yourself, you're just as bad as Fox News.

  • What "facts"? How about your own eyes. When the hell does a building not hit by debris, burning on one side on the first floor, ignited by diesel fuel at 410 degrees F, burning black (oxygen starved), then fall on it's own footprint? Even if I follow the inane "Steel melted and weakened the structure" line, I find this extremely contrived. Even the second WTC building hit, had jet fuel flying out the side of the building.

  • Actually the "official" story isn't that steel melted.

    WTC7 was very much hit by debris. I have doubts about much of the government's reactions to that day, but when it comes to WTC7, I go with the guys that were there. There are plenty of quotes out there from firefighters who say they knew it would come down due to massive damage.

    I would be hard pressed to say those guys are all liars.

  • This is not true.

    There are no quotes from firefighters regarding the damage to WTC7 from WTC1&2 or it's eminent collapse.

    Firefighters were evacuated against their will from WTC7.

  • Ho hum. Sharing your fantasies on public forums... AGAIN? Hate him? Nah, I see through you.

  • Good job.

    Do you think that Right hand on Left collar is a signal of "get me out of here!!".

    Notice that he looks directly at a police officer who doesn't seem to get the signal. (Or perhaps realizes that the person is in absolutely no danger so dismisses "the signal")

  • qrad,

    If it's really peer reviewed, how did a made up article get published there?

  • It's like those "Universities" with the small ads in the back of magazines. They provide "real college degrees." For a fee.

  • This is a REAL scientific journal. It is peer-reviewed as I quoted earlier.

    By publishing in an OPEN scientific journal, the authors have retained their copyright over the material in the paper. For this privilege, they pay a fee. Instead of relying on subscription fees to fund their operations, OPEN journals rely on these fees from authors to PAY for PEER REVIEW and publishing expenses. Any attempts to discredit this journal show your inability to reason impartially. The facts are indisputable

  • It's vanity publication for pretend scientists.

  • Either a lot of you 9/11 Liars are just INSANELY STUPID, OR YOU'RE SHILLING FOR THE TRAITORS that perpetrated this MASSIVE crime against Americans and the world. Whatever the reason, GO FUCK YOURSELVES. We people who value truth, have read the reports and done our homework on this issue are filled with a BURNING PASSION, and your days of spewing lies and misinformation are numbered. All over the country, we are beginning to file treason charges against you assholes Some advice SHUT UP GET LOST

  • Ah! Ha! A testable assertion! Please enumerate these filings so we can verify them. What? You don't know? Ah, too bad. They don't exist then. What? You can't tell me? Tell me again, who's keeping cuckoo secrets around here? What? You want me to look them up? Why? It's your factoid, numnutz. Back it up!

  • lol. I love the part where the nut says "scientific proof" and "scientific peer reviewed paper". It's just so CUTE! :)

  • It's time to put this flamer in prison where he belongs. SOLITARY (no prison boys). Why are Americans so fucking stupid that we let SLIMEBALLS like this make our decisions for us?!?! By the way, you WEARECHANGE people are FUCKING FANTASTIC!!! When the history of getting rid of this scum we call our government is told, you'll be right up there with the minute-men of the 1770's. Kudos on your tremendous courage! Teddy Woodward

  • You simple fuck.

  • qradqrad,

    Just because the website says it doesn't make it so.

    Again, someone submitted a FAKE, MADE UP article to the same journal, and it was published! Real scientific journals don't ask for money!

    qrad, do the same that you ask us to do. Don't take what someone says at face value. look into it.

  • From the journal website:

    "All manuscripts submitted for publication will be immediately subjected to peer-reviewing, usually in consultation with the members of the Editorial Advisory Board and a number of external referees."

    Peer-reviewed facts. It is treasonous to ignore this situation at this point.

  • It's treasonous to ignore toy publications pretending to practice scientific journalism?

  • qradqrad,

    The Bentham journals are not peer editted. They are vanity journals. You have to PAY to get your article published. That's not how genuine scientific journals do things.

    Google Philip Davis and Bentham. He submitted a MADE UP paper to the same journal that you mention. He got it published. All he had to do was send in the check.

  • For anyone who thinks the thermite paper is not peer reviewed, check out the home page of the Open Journal of Chemical Physics at:

    bentham. org /open/tocpj/MSandI. htm

    This paper has been peer reviewed and has not been debunked. It is scientific fact, and it is pointless to argue against it. We will have a new investigation of 9/11 in time, whether under this government or another. The facts will come out and many will be tried for treason.

  • Hey everyone knows that passports can survive fireballs. Anyone can outwit the most tech, advanced airforce in the most protected airspace on earth for nearly 2 hours, it happens all the time. Of course 3 steel buildings can collapse from from fire in one day all in the span of under 10 seconds, nothing fishy about that. And that 2.3 tril. missing funds being investigated at the Pentagon, where the investigators and evidence went up in smoke? You conspiracy ' theorists' are just crazy.

  • @JFingers1 did you see the woman standing in the north tower plane hole???

  • The paper was NOT peer reviewed. Look up what that means.

  • SHE WAS A PLANT...SHE IS AN ACTIVIST

  • Barney Frank, what a pathetic human being...

  • Stop the anti gay slurrs!!!

  • I was at this town hall. Barney confused physicists and physicians. He wouldn't know a peer reviewed paper if it bit him in the ass. He is completely unqualified to judge the facts in this matter. Too bad for him... We'll just have to try him for treason along with all the other criminals in DC. I N F O W A R S . C O M

  • Fucking idiot conspiracy theorist.

  • America is Zion and Americans are the real Israelites. We will be destroyed on 10-10-09 by Russia, China, and the SCO.....the same day as the next us/israel false flag to invade Iran.

    This is the war of Armageddon and you can know its now by all the chemtrails sprayed every day globally to hide the sign in the heavens. This is whats causing all the quakes and is the reason the govt is now classifying all asteroid events secret.

    News and sources here:

    (3w) . scribd . com/doc/16612974/War-News

  • 10-10-09 came and went and nothing happened

    I guess you must now concede that you are a fucking moron

  • If I hear the phrase "peer reviewed" about a paper that was published in two journals:

    1. Where the "peers" were the writer himself and History and Philosophy professors.

    2. A journal that doesn't peer review. You must PAY to have an article published in it.

    Also, nothing was buried at Fresh Kills.

    Before you accuse others of not being informed, check facts yourself before you buy them at face value from the internet.

  • Kooks to the left of him... Kooks to the right.

  • I agree ... the elite in congress are traitors to this country. We have to find some way to get rid of them all. Since they rig the elections we can't do it that way. We must find another way. The life of our beloved country depends on it.

  • He is a traitor is the highest degree!

  • kook

  • Branyard Frank is a typical swine pig faced politician. Why would any American vote for this hogshit/ Beats me silly. Have you noticed no major media wants to confront this topic since Bush invaded Fag/Iraq.Juice media wants to protect their bloodlines--says Les Pisrael

  • Jew. Traitor.

  • The entire congress are TRAITORS!!!

    On 10-10-09, when the us/israel do their next false flag to invade Iran, Russia, China and the SCO are going to destroy America.

    This is the war of Armageddon and you can know it is now by all the chemtrails sprayed every day globally to hide the sign in the heavens. It is causing all the big quakes lately and is the reason the govt is now classifying all asteroid events secret.

    News and sources here:

    (3w) . scribd . com/doc/16612974/War-News

  • quick bust out the tinfoil hats

  • Do you government sponsored/influenced Conspiracy Theorists always say "Tin Foil Hat" when someone comes up with a more logical and scientific theory of 9/11, than your idiotic theory of "19 Arabs with Box Cutters directed by a dying kidney patient from a cave in Afghanistan who also stopped NORAD from intercepting 4 hijacked planes?"

  • more logical than reality? hahahahahaahaha

  • So you were there and have all the facts, and "reality" means what the US Government pours into your empty head? What is difficult to understand that your theory is the least logical of all the theories? Also, since you have privy information, what caused WTC7 to collapse and what caused the stand down of the entire NORAD system?

  • My "empty head"; I suspect my eduction level is somewhat higher than yours. Learn about science and then come back and look at the idiotic claims of truthers

  • go get some education and then call me dumbass

  • stfu, dumbass.

  • awesomely poor retort

  • @dresteban

    well then, it suits your intellectual capacity well.

    doesn't it?

  • @@dresteban

    220 storeys collapsed in less than 40 seconds. thats almost 6 floors per second. explain or shut the fuck up! oh, yes. floor by floor, if you wouldn't mind, dumbass. thanks!

  • Your shit has been debunked by various structural engineers.

  • Prove it. Where is your proof?

  • @dresteban

    then give me scientific proof that no explosives were used on 9/11. you know, the works. can you provide that evidence, dumbass? thought not. now, fuck off. excuse my french.

  • ok I will explain something to you the way the scientific method works is that you need proof to support a hypothesis and you have no proof that there was explosives used. You are a dumass do you even have a high school level education?

  • @dresteban

    YOU have "science" on your side. it is YOUR claim that those towers collapsed without any help from explosives. so im asking you: explain, in detail aka floor by floor, how can 220 storeys of conrete and steel turn into dust in less than 45 seconds, which is at a rate of almost 6 floors per second. go ahead, dresteban. if i am "wrong" and you are "right", it shouldn't be too difficult for you to explain. in detail, as i said, because "you know how scientific method works". GO!

  • @911reset Your limited education prevents you from understanding how a building could fall over? a man-made building made of steel and concrete? quite easily! they're not perfect structures. just look what happens when an earthquake strikes even a place like LA. HOW DO THOSE BUILDINGS FALL DOWN!? OMG?!?! WHAT A MYSTERY!? Hey, here's a question for you: How could the Titanic, which was SUPPOSED to be "unsinkable", sink? Must have been a British conspiracy to bomb it to the ocean floor... right?

  • Actually, by believing the governments Official Conspiracy Theory® of "19 Arabs with Box Cutters directed by an ex-CIA dying kidney patient from a cave in Afghanistan©", it demonstrates naivety in the extreme. I posed some anomalies to you, namely WTC7 with a small diesel fire on one first floor quadrant, and a stand down of the entire NORAD apparatus after FOUR jets were hijacked, and you come back with "My dick....er education is bigger than yours".

  • Great job.

  • The tyrannts will slither away and hide, like the snakes in the grass they are!

  • This looks kinda sneaky. Why not use a normal camera. Hmmmm

  • Yeah, this looks like a hidden camera at an ambush. Like him or hate him, Frank knows better than to discuss the contents of a random bunch of papers shoved at him by a stranger in a chaotic public place.

  • You probably would have stimulated a bigger response from Mr. Frank if you were a 12 year old boy.

  • Aw snap.

  • being gay and being a paedophile are not the same thing you bigoted moron

  • To paraphrase Barney Frank, "Trying to have a conversation with [him] would be like arguing with a dining room table." He's a dining room table and not a very attractive one, either.

  • Good job at staying on him!

  • Mr. Rothe-Kushel makes a quick cameo in "The Alex Jones Deception."

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more