Well and your "EQUAL" thing is a concept from Karl Marx.....you're an idiot.
Power is what drives people since....ever. Nietzsche has done his own interpretations of power and Marx only said what everybody wanted to hear, just like you.
@Android369 : except I never said a thing about equality. You are a reactionary. Very few want to hear what I have to say, so obviously you are wrong about that.
@pyrrho314 Don't you dare to tell me what i am or what i am not! I will not allow you to pretend as if you're somehow not in favour of equality. How dare you?
@pyrrho314 Well uniqueness in this sense that everyone's dna is different, but to apply the same value to all people would be insane, because it would justify a very sophisticated and ideological genocide. Islamists tend to be more extreme than those docile christians. Christians are humble as a whole and only a few of them are insane, but the principles of islam are something else. Human rights to people who actively kill would be like spitting on other people who don't kill.
The concept of will basically does free will in. I one sense, will is something determined, your Will is not my will so, what can "freedom" do but subtract? If we reversed time and played back a decision, could one ever change because of freedom? If so, what does that say about your will? In the other sense in an apparently causal reality, who is truly the will'er when everything you are was built and is being maintained by everything else? We've never been isolated, separate creatures.
Naameum! Haha! Just to clarify, because I have not seen all your videos on free will or will power. Are you saying that will power is... what you will to power. As in I have the want to get food, I use will power to go get food, and then when I realise my limit I use will power to stop my self from having to much. So you start more like open will... or desire of will. Free as in my only limitations are my own situation limitations and I have the free will to act. But not control fate? Dying?
I think, ultimately, we are free--free to chose if will act or react emotionally; when we realized, in the ultimate analysis, no one can really make us feel without our consent. Even if someone is torturing, even in that extreme situation, you have the choice to hate or to love. And that's a pretty extreme example, I know. But I'm going by the Holocaust literature I've read. What really dehumanizes is when we think we do not have this choice.
The biggest problem I have with the vast majority of your videos is I either agree with what you're saying or you're talking about something I know very little about so I can neither agree nor disagree. As far as this video is concerned. I agree.
@army2k08 : maybe we shouldn't model reality on a slave plantation... there are alternates... forces and fields unify "freedom" and "bounding conditions" pretty well without incoherent concepts. But using current language I simply agree with you.
@pyrrho314 The only reason why free will/determinism is hard to define is because of the limits of language..How is this: Freedom and liberty only exist between constraints. One doesn't exist without the other.
IKR. That's why I don't discuss many of these things anymore. The last conversation I had on determinism was stuck with me trying to explain how the granularity with which we consider the topic can go from my affect on someone else to every particle in the universe having an affect on me, a collection of particles. We never made past that part. *sigh
Eliminating the word "free" makes the concept more coherent; but power is a well-defined physical term. How can your definition of (will) power be represented coherently in a mathematical form?
I love solving mysteries, riddles, paradoxes and problems. That's the heart of science for me. Just solving the unsolved and looking for deeper and darker mysteries of this.
Thanks for ending the video like that pyrrho, but don't do it too often. Entertainment gets boring fast but I appreciated the little unexpected jolt of neural chemicals.
Well and your "EQUAL" thing is a concept from Karl Marx.....you're an idiot.
Power is what drives people since....ever. Nietzsche has done his own interpretations of power and Marx only said what everybody wanted to hear, just like you.
Android369 1 month ago
@Android369 : except I never said a thing about equality. You are a reactionary. Very few want to hear what I have to say, so obviously you are wrong about that.
pyrrho314 1 month ago
@pyrrho314 Don't you dare to tell me what i am or what i am not! I will not allow you to pretend as if you're somehow not in favour of equality. How dare you?
Android369 1 month ago
@Android369 : everyone is unique, that's not equal. What I favor is human rights,not equality.
pyrrho314 1 month ago
@pyrrho314 Well uniqueness in this sense that everyone's dna is different, but to apply the same value to all people would be insane, because it would justify a very sophisticated and ideological genocide. Islamists tend to be more extreme than those docile christians. Christians are humble as a whole and only a few of them are insane, but the principles of islam are something else. Human rights to people who actively kill would be like spitting on other people who don't kill.
Android369 1 month ago
I think you've nailed it.
cjmackay01 1 month ago
The concept of will basically does free will in. I one sense, will is something determined, your Will is not my will so, what can "freedom" do but subtract? If we reversed time and played back a decision, could one ever change because of freedom? If so, what does that say about your will? In the other sense in an apparently causal reality, who is truly the will'er when everything you are was built and is being maintained by everything else? We've never been isolated, separate creatures.
blackcrow6667 1 month ago
you seem irritaable lately pyrrho?
TheEmoDiary 1 month ago
@TheEmoDiary : oh yeah! you talkin to me!?!? :)
pyrrho314 1 month ago
@pyrrho314 ; )
TheEmoDiary 1 month ago
True, but the powerful are freer than the powerless.
jollyradical 1 month ago
Naameum! Haha! Just to clarify, because I have not seen all your videos on free will or will power. Are you saying that will power is... what you will to power. As in I have the want to get food, I use will power to go get food, and then when I realise my limit I use will power to stop my self from having to much. So you start more like open will... or desire of will. Free as in my only limitations are my own situation limitations and I have the free will to act. But not control fate? Dying?
TheaDragonSpirit 1 month ago
I think, ultimately, we are free--free to chose if will act or react emotionally; when we realized, in the ultimate analysis, no one can really make us feel without our consent. Even if someone is torturing, even in that extreme situation, you have the choice to hate or to love. And that's a pretty extreme example, I know. But I'm going by the Holocaust literature I've read. What really dehumanizes is when we think we do not have this choice.
alienbaroque 1 month ago
The biggest problem I have with the vast majority of your videos is I either agree with what you're saying or you're talking about something I know very little about so I can neither agree nor disagree. As far as this video is concerned. I agree.
HarveyHopkins 1 month ago
Bloody free will. Who needs it :P
Loreleila 1 month ago
Freedom requires rules, laws and restriction. People need to accept it.
army2k08 1 month ago
@army2k08 : maybe we shouldn't model reality on a slave plantation... there are alternates... forces and fields unify "freedom" and "bounding conditions" pretty well without incoherent concepts. But using current language I simply agree with you.
pyrrho314 1 month ago
@pyrrho314 The only reason why free will/determinism is hard to define is because of the limits of language..How is this: Freedom and liberty only exist between constraints. One doesn't exist without the other.
army2k08 1 month ago
@army2k08 : I would hesitate to say "only" in the long run... but currently, it is what is holding us back I again agree.
pyrrho314 1 month ago
IKR. That's why I don't discuss many of these things anymore. The last conversation I had on determinism was stuck with me trying to explain how the granularity with which we consider the topic can go from my affect on someone else to every particle in the universe having an affect on me, a collection of particles. We never made past that part. *sigh
Only beer is free on St. Patty's Day.
alowlyapprentice 1 month ago
Eliminating the word "free" makes the concept more coherent; but power is a well-defined physical term. How can your definition of (will) power be represented coherently in a mathematical form?
IdaMiaDot 1 month ago
@IdaMiaDot I mean... assuming it's supposed to be analogous to other forms of force/power.
IdaMiaDot 1 month ago
@IdaMiaDot : it's not just analagous... if it is influencing the body I'm saying it has to be by definition literally power.
pyrrho314 1 month ago
@IdaMiaDot : it's part of physics, it will have a pattern and the patter will be called math even if it's a wholly "new" math.
pyrrho314 1 month ago
I loved that "neyeh" at the end of the video.
I love solving mysteries, riddles, paradoxes and problems. That's the heart of science for me. Just solving the unsolved and looking for deeper and darker mysteries of this.
Thanks for ending the video like that pyrrho, but don't do it too often. Entertainment gets boring fast but I appreciated the little unexpected jolt of neural chemicals.
ABitOfTheUniverse 1 month ago