for the record the state courts have know power to prosecute the Citizen of that state due to the 11th amendmend and would that make a conviction to be over turn no matter how long ago it is ???
Here's the problem: All of this operates under the assumption that the system is fair. As if by knowing all of this the system will acquiesce. This entire system is tyrannical. There is no special way you can stop these tyrants from throwing you in jail. They answer to no one. If it was as simple as telling them "I do not consent to you arresting me" and walking away; they would not carry firearms.
Their "coercion" is not telling you off in court. Its jail and death.
here is my argument this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the prosecutor has failed to set jurisdiction under title 28 judiciary and judicial procedures under USC. If the judge says I have it the 11th amendment took that off of you and if you are bringing me in under title 50, that is briging me in as trading under the enemy. If he sais martial law I object because under title 10 333 i still have my rights and how did you even get in office if under martial law???
I am going to be very kind. The only witness has lied several times in the affidavit and contradicted itself but my laywers want 20,000 just for a rediculous case. I do not trust them. I was going to bring in a notary. State violations the prosecutor has made, felonies under USC. Also who is the real party in interest????? I am out on bail so they might try to revoke it or hold me in contempt. I can say you are trying to intimidate me and claim obstruction and terroist acts but can they get me?
i am fighting a crazy case. I've already been to arraignment and I am glad for this info but man I am scared to death. Every lawyer said If i choose this argument they will not represent me. One said if I use this argument, I will sit in jail for 18 months and beat it on appeal on the supreme court. I was going to file the coram nobis and coram non judice, appear on special appearance and state case dismisall for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under rule 12 of fed rules civil procedure.
@VietBoi503 Of course - the judge can't argue this, only intimidate, threaten, cause duress, etc. If they see in your eyes that you're not sure of yourself, they will steam roll right over you and flatten you like a pancake. It's a den of vipers in the court room.
@BoKnowsEntertainment Well I would like someone going to court and pulling this off. I looked carefully at the case again and noticed that it was saying that the Supreme Court couldn't hear the case because it lacks jurisdiction due to the fact it was created by the Constiution. However it said that legislated court can hear the case.
@VietBoi503 How I deal with contempt - shuts them up every time.
"Sir, for and on the record, it is not my intent to create, invite, foster or exhibit any form or measure of contempt. However, because I do not understand why you're threatening me with contempt, I cannot promise, not can I be expected, to not do it again. In order that I may understand the alleged contempt for which you've threatened me and thereby...
@VietBoi503 (cont'd) ...not repeat the alleged contempt, I ask that you inform me as to the nature and cause of the alleged contempt. If it is criminal contempt for which you threaten me, please identify and bring forth the injured party so that I may address him or her and respond and rebut. If it is civil contempt for which you threaten me, please bring forth the contract that I am alleged to have breached so that I may review it, address it and rebut.
you folks need to understand that all judges are foreign agent attorneys that are being paid by the foreign corporation USA with the money you folks give them. They ship this money to the stolen land and then pay the catholic attorney judges to destroy you. It is that simple. But Rod class will not tell you that. And rod class sure loves to sport a jew beard. You folks better wake up.
If you listen to the latest audio you are going to hear a nigger jewess hustling for them. stand up white man!
Look at the court case in the 1960's, in Mn, that had the defendant winning the foreclosure case because it was proven the fed reserve produced the money out of thin air. The jury found in the guys favor. The judge agreed. The judge then had a boat/fishing accident within 6 months. There's your sign. I know this crap. You know this crap. Lets get together and sell seminars for 5,ooo dollars, and share this crap. The 14th amendment created the UNITED STATES corporation and "strawman".
That and a bag of chips will get your thrown in prison for violation of the corporate code. WTF is this guy saying? We know they are criminals pre 14th amendment and the creation of the UNITED STATES corporation. NOW WHAT. If we had enforcement of laws like the Logan Act, we wouldn't be here either. Wouldda, couldda, shouldda. "They" are giving us admiralty law, and there isn't anything we can do other than get the states to declare sovereignty under the 10th amendment, and marginalize the "fed"
@bigc028282 1930 case law. Not going to get it done. I wish things were different. I suggest you prepare for the next False Flag for affect, when "they" think too many are becoming aware. "They" can run a whore house in Nevada, but can False Flag the sh!t out of things to get the masses to scream for DADDY. Prepare for the monthly checks to stop, and the masses burning everything down.
for the record the state courts have know power to prosecute the Citizen of that state due to the 11th amendmend and would that make a conviction to be over turn no matter how long ago it is ???
drybonesconnection 3 weeks ago
Here's the problem: All of this operates under the assumption that the system is fair. As if by knowing all of this the system will acquiesce. This entire system is tyrannical. There is no special way you can stop these tyrants from throwing you in jail. They answer to no one. If it was as simple as telling them "I do not consent to you arresting me" and walking away; they would not carry firearms.
Their "coercion" is not telling you off in court. Its jail and death.
Shehasnomorals 2 months ago
Case style:
281 U.S. 464 (1930)
FEDERAL RADIO COMMISSION
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ET AL.
No. 122.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 17, 20, 1930.
Decided May 19, 1930.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Echelon2600 6 months ago
It would help people more easily study the referenced case with a citation:
Short citation: Radio Comm. v. General Electric Co., 281 US 464 (U.S. Sup. Ct. 1930)
Echelon2600 6 months ago
boku, what are the chances of them throwing this out? i need this dismissed.
Christian2end 10 months ago
here is my argument this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the prosecutor has failed to set jurisdiction under title 28 judiciary and judicial procedures under USC. If the judge says I have it the 11th amendment took that off of you and if you are bringing me in under title 50, that is briging me in as trading under the enemy. If he sais martial law I object because under title 10 333 i still have my rights and how did you even get in office if under martial law???
Christian2end 10 months ago
I am going to be very kind. The only witness has lied several times in the affidavit and contradicted itself but my laywers want 20,000 just for a rediculous case. I do not trust them. I was going to bring in a notary. State violations the prosecutor has made, felonies under USC. Also who is the real party in interest????? I am out on bail so they might try to revoke it or hold me in contempt. I can say you are trying to intimidate me and claim obstruction and terroist acts but can they get me?
Christian2end 10 months ago
i am fighting a crazy case. I've already been to arraignment and I am glad for this info but man I am scared to death. Every lawyer said If i choose this argument they will not represent me. One said if I use this argument, I will sit in jail for 18 months and beat it on appeal on the supreme court. I was going to file the coram nobis and coram non judice, appear on special appearance and state case dismisall for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under rule 12 of fed rules civil procedure.
Christian2end 10 months ago
I brought this up and the judge threaten to take a cop out (hinting at arresting me for contempt of court). So I ended pleaing not guilty. -__-'
VietBoi503 1 year ago
@VietBoi503 Of course - the judge can't argue this, only intimidate, threaten, cause duress, etc. If they see in your eyes that you're not sure of yourself, they will steam roll right over you and flatten you like a pancake. It's a den of vipers in the court room.
BoKnowsEntertainment 1 year ago 4
@BoKnowsEntertainment Well I would like someone going to court and pulling this off. I looked carefully at the case again and noticed that it was saying that the Supreme Court couldn't hear the case because it lacks jurisdiction due to the fact it was created by the Constiution. However it said that legislated court can hear the case.
VietBoi503 1 year ago
@VietBoi503 How I deal with contempt - shuts them up every time.
"Sir, for and on the record, it is not my intent to create, invite, foster or exhibit any form or measure of contempt. However, because I do not understand why you're threatening me with contempt, I cannot promise, not can I be expected, to not do it again. In order that I may understand the alleged contempt for which you've threatened me and thereby...
Echelon2600 6 months ago
@VietBoi503 (cont'd) ...not repeat the alleged contempt, I ask that you inform me as to the nature and cause of the alleged contempt. If it is criminal contempt for which you threaten me, please identify and bring forth the injured party so that I may address him or her and respond and rebut. If it is civil contempt for which you threaten me, please bring forth the contract that I am alleged to have breached so that I may review it, address it and rebut.
Echelon2600 6 months ago
you folks need to understand that all judges are foreign agent attorneys that are being paid by the foreign corporation USA with the money you folks give them. They ship this money to the stolen land and then pay the catholic attorney judges to destroy you. It is that simple. But Rod class will not tell you that. And rod class sure loves to sport a jew beard. You folks better wake up.
If you listen to the latest audio you are going to hear a nigger jewess hustling for them. stand up white man!
attorneyskillforjew 1 year ago
Get a Notary!
worryphree 1 year ago
@worryphree for the record, fyi three witnesses also accomplish the same under common law.
BoKnowsEntertainment 1 year ago
@BoKnowsEntertainment Thanks! Good to know. You like Rob Menard?
worryphree 1 year ago
@worryphree Yes, gotta love that guy for all he's done AND he's funny too.
BoKnowsEntertainment 1 year ago
It is at the Judges discretion, all the Winston, mickey , TT will not net you positive repeatable results, Why ? its at the courts discretion.
rippinandrunnin 1 year ago
Look at the court case in the 1960's, in Mn, that had the defendant winning the foreclosure case because it was proven the fed reserve produced the money out of thin air. The jury found in the guys favor. The judge agreed. The judge then had a boat/fishing accident within 6 months. There's your sign. I know this crap. You know this crap. Lets get together and sell seminars for 5,ooo dollars, and share this crap. The 14th amendment created the UNITED STATES corporation and "strawman".
bigc028282 1 year ago
@bigc028282 What case-law was that from? I'd appreciate it for my research.
Thanks.
vassephardi 1 year ago
That and a bag of chips will get your thrown in prison for violation of the corporate code. WTF is this guy saying? We know they are criminals pre 14th amendment and the creation of the UNITED STATES corporation. NOW WHAT. If we had enforcement of laws like the Logan Act, we wouldn't be here either. Wouldda, couldda, shouldda. "They" are giving us admiralty law, and there isn't anything we can do other than get the states to declare sovereignty under the 10th amendment, and marginalize the "fed"
bigc028282 1 year ago
@bigc028282 1930 case law. Not going to get it done. I wish things were different. I suggest you prepare for the next False Flag for affect, when "they" think too many are becoming aware. "They" can run a whore house in Nevada, but can False Flag the sh!t out of things to get the masses to scream for DADDY. Prepare for the monthly checks to stop, and the masses burning everything down.
bigc028282 1 year ago
@bigc028282 can't instead of "can" run a whore house.. sorry.
bigc028282 1 year ago
they need to hold the Judge to his oath of office before the proceedings begin, per Winston Strout moving the court into Admiralty!
THERE is ONLY the LAW of CONTRACT!
Signzit 1 year ago
º°¨ ¸„ø¤º°¨„ø¤º°¨°º¤ø„¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„ ¸ How about a world º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„ ¸ without money º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„ ¸ Governments, courts º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„ ¸ religions and armies? º¤ø„¸
¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º „¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ ¸„ø¤º „¸¨°
FreedomForMankind 1 year ago