If anyone is interested, message me, I can send you the link for a free software program that can sample this movie, or series of photos, and output a clear still image with much less noise. I guess i t works by averaging the data.
@ChrissyoSpace Do you know of any free programs to stabilize a video or a selected segment , I seen one vid where a "ufo" object was like hard to see and once it was stabilized it was a fairly clear video. I'm not sure if Registax can stabilze video.
OK, thanks it was Registax. It's fairly easy to use, but I wish there was a good manual about tweaking it. You can also use the defaults and it works great usually.
hi i am really newbies yday i seen jupiter with my mead lx90 10inch telescope all i can see is white ball and little two of his moon i want to know how can i see more in details and do i need to change my eyepiece i only have eyepiece supplied with telescope
I had build a rather crude wooden adapter for it - the camera sat in a sort of cradle with a clamp around the eyepiece that would hold the camera lens up to the eyepiece.
With my videos that I made with the video camera, I was able to make use of the camera's built in zoom. With a 26mm eyepiece and 2X barlow lens, the telescope would be operating at ~ 96X magnification. The camera also had up to 10X optical zoom, meaning I could push it to about 960X magnification. Hence the size here.
Sure, that's been what I've been doing from the start. Some of my newer videos have stacked images added to the end, and there is a link to my deviantart page on my profile that has all my processed images.
1000 magnification?not to question you,but are you sure?the most you can usually get out os a scope is 50 mag per inch.i own a 14 inch dob,and can only get 700 magnification out of it.what kind of telescope do you have,a refractor or a dob,shmitt?
Yeah, I'm sure. Though, it's not *actually* 1000 magnification because part of it was due to digital zoom on the video camera.
FL = 1250mm with 2X barlow = 2500mm
Eyepiece was about 26mm.
Plus ~10 to 15X digital zoom on video camera
I don't have a calculator with me right now (on a mall internet booth) so I cant do the calculation. It should be around 1000X or so though. (But, not *true* magnification).
You think the seeing is bad in the video? If that is bad, I'd like to see from where you do it because that seems like loads of detail compared to what I usually see.
Periodic Error Control? You mean I need my mount to be tracking better? In these videos, I only use a fairly rough polar alignment, that's why I keep readjusting it with the hand controller.
You can see Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and sometimes (under very good stars) Uranus. From the naked eye with no telescope they just look like stars though.
That's awesome!
The1FlyingHigh 8 months ago
@The1FlyingHigh Thanks! :)
ChrissyoSpace 8 months ago
wow te detail is phenominal!!!
hiian123 1 year ago
i wish they could have this type telescope for $20.00 instead of $2000.00
igenther99 1 year ago
Man I can't believe my brother took my telescope. I never learned how to use it though, but I was 14 and ignorant. Ah who cares I'll buy a better one
thatsMrSmileytoyou 1 year ago
If anyone is interested, message me, I can send you the link for a free software program that can sample this movie, or series of photos, and output a clear still image with much less noise. I guess i t works by averaging the data.
trailkeeper 2 years ago
Thanks, but I already use such a program, it's called Registax. There are a number of other free software packages that will do the same thing too.
ChrissyoSpace 2 years ago
@ChrissyoSpace Do you know of any free programs to stabilize a video or a selected segment , I seen one vid where a "ufo" object was like hard to see and once it was stabilized it was a fairly clear video. I'm not sure if Registax can stabilze video.
trailkeeper 1 year ago
OK, thanks it was Registax. It's fairly easy to use, but I wish there was a good manual about tweaking it. You can also use the defaults and it works great usually.
trailkeeper 2 years ago
hi i am really newbies yday i seen jupiter with my mead lx90 10inch telescope all i can see is white ball and little two of his moon i want to know how can i see more in details and do i need to change my eyepiece i only have eyepiece supplied with telescope
reshu151 1 year ago
excellant!!
Astr0n0n0 2 years ago
wow can you tell me what telescope you use for this video ?
PrzerabiaFilmy 2 years ago
My telescope is a 10" Newtonian.
ChrissyoSpace 2 years ago
hi just wanna ask how much a telescope would cost.thanks
MsTormented 2 years ago
The telescope I used in this video was about $800AU. The tracking mount I have it on was about $1500AU
ChrissyoSpace 2 years ago
ESPECTACULAR... HERMOSO
miguetiburon 2 years ago
WOOOW amazing Resolution!!!
great work =D
xato909 2 years ago
Fantastic. Please pray tell - what video camera did you use??
taqyon 2 years ago
Thanks.
For this video I was using an old Panasonic DV video camera.
ChrissyoSpace 2 years ago
How did you mount it?
I'm using a web cam but can't get any detail as good as what you have on this vid.
taqyon 2 years ago
I had build a rather crude wooden adapter for it - the camera sat in a sort of cradle with a clamp around the eyepiece that would hold the camera lens up to the eyepiece.
With my videos that I made with the video camera, I was able to make use of the camera's built in zoom. With a 26mm eyepiece and 2X barlow lens, the telescope would be operating at ~ 96X magnification. The camera also had up to 10X optical zoom, meaning I could push it to about 960X magnification. Hence the size here.
ChrissyoSpace 2 years ago
Fantastic, awesome results. Have you tried to stack it?
taqyon 2 years ago
Sure, that's been what I've been doing from the start. Some of my newer videos have stacked images added to the end, and there is a link to my deviantart page on my profile that has all my processed images.
ChrissyoSpace 2 years ago
wow thats amazing... i wish i could afford a telescope that good. ha oh well
sk8erboi8484 2 years ago
Wow, excellent!
Have you done any stacking of the individual frames for a composite?
Do you play around with any CCD imagers? Just curious.. I bought a CCD Labs imager last year, its awesome!
Great vid, thanks!
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
Great footage!
54spiritedwill54 2 years ago
Still a good vid tho. i just got a C11 yay !!
mark1252003 3 years ago
Without the Digital zoom it would only be about 96x
mark1252003 3 years ago
Yup, that sounds about right. The digital zoom just gives it the image scale (with no added detail, of course).
ChrissyoSpace 3 years ago
1000 magnification?not to question you,but are you sure?the most you can usually get out os a scope is 50 mag per inch.i own a 14 inch dob,and can only get 700 magnification out of it.what kind of telescope do you have,a refractor or a dob,shmitt?
weldingwhiz77 3 years ago
Yeah, I'm sure. Though, it's not *actually* 1000 magnification because part of it was due to digital zoom on the video camera.
FL = 1250mm with 2X barlow = 2500mm
Eyepiece was about 26mm.
Plus ~10 to 15X digital zoom on video camera
I don't have a calculator with me right now (on a mall internet booth) so I cant do the calculation. It should be around 1000X or so though. (But, not *true* magnification).
ChrissyoSpace 3 years ago
It's funny even though it is more than 11 times wider than the Earth, it takes less than 10 hours to rotate. Nice shot
RJL738 3 years ago
Comment removed
taqyon 3 years ago
You think the seeing is bad in the video? If that is bad, I'd like to see from where you do it because that seems like loads of detail compared to what I usually see.
joshig1983 2 years ago
Looks like a jaw breaker!!!
braddudeguy 3 years ago
it's on my birtday=))
beredelamunte 3 years ago
here you cannot see the gasses moving like crazy. the famous eye
sanshirovits 3 years ago
that's awesome....watching somethign soooo far away..
luevanoalx 3 years ago
That's awesome! The wobbliness is due to the Earth's atmosphere bending the light.
FionaTheFox 3 years ago
if that planet is that big on your telescope then that planet is so fucking huge!!!!!!
836mvp50 4 years ago
Jupiter is indeed huge. I used a fair bit of magnification for this video as well.
ChrissyoSpace 4 years ago
so what scope is it exactly?
OntZ 4 years ago
It is a 10" F5 Newtonian telescope.
ChrissyoSpace 4 years ago
what power is this?
OntZ 4 years ago
A bit over 1000X magnification.
ChrissyoSpace 4 years ago
geeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzz
OntZ 4 years ago
1000x???
how big is your scope?
sammylojax 3 years ago
It has a 10 inch primary mirror (about 25cm diameter) with a focal length of 1250 mm.
ChrissyoSpace 3 years ago
Oops sorry, I accidenty deleted your last comment (I pressed 'Remove' rather than 'Reply' accidently, they're right next to each other).
In response, I wish my telescope was 88000 miles large! That would produce some great images! :P
ChrissyoSpace 3 years ago
Very good!
Julianpe 4 years ago
Well... you need one a PEC...
sandroac34 4 years ago
Periodic Error Control? You mean I need my mount to be tracking better? In these videos, I only use a fairly rough polar alignment, that's why I keep readjusting it with the hand controller.
ChrissyoSpace 4 years ago
Well that pretty much explains why I can't keep track of the damn thing: I have to adjust it manually.
MothmanCometh 3 years ago
Great footage!
TheRealBlackHair 4 years ago
thats crazy! awsome vid
pharoah246 4 years ago
Good work Chris looks very nice, lost of detail.
acasanova27 4 years ago
I like this
sennetor 4 years ago
excellent sir very good
MGAVBRACE 4 years ago
very cool. i have a question. wich planets can u see some day with only your eyes?
leefbeef 4 years ago
You can see Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and sometimes (under very good stars) Uranus. From the naked eye with no telescope they just look like stars though.
ChrissyoSpace 4 years ago
holy poo poo do the moon next
rubbbe 4 years ago
I have a few videos of the moon in my profile.
ChrissyoSpace 4 years ago
That is superb
jamminit2 4 years ago
Very nice color-contrast balance. Are all your night skies there that unsteady?
LollipopSpider 4 years ago
Pretty much. I have a habit of using a bit too much magnification though :P That will increase the severity of the 'bubbling'.
ChrissyoSpace 4 years ago