Where is the music? This is not music; it is sheer ego tug 'n pull. He played it too aggressive, unpoetic, and on the mechanical side.
The orchestra wasn't of high caliber too. I can't believe how people are overrating this performance; it isn't even musical. I recalled Oistrakh did a better job of this concerto in a LP recording.
@freeqwerqwer Hello, I am a violin player and I do play this tune. This is my favorite repertoire, and also I do know ho it should sound as you do (maybe I am better cause I can play this movement). This recording it the best I have ever heard. Well, if you want something not "aggressive", listen to Klemperer (1958) version, but this is still one of the best. If you can't play this virtuosic movement, you need to think more and be respectful to this historic performance.
@Oistrakhfollower , Oistrak's Beethoven is broad rich tone, powerful, and melodic but I also like Mehuhim's Beethoven too which is more subdued, humble, respectful of the orchestra, and his sweet tone is charming too. I think Perlam's Beethoven is more faithful to the score but Perlman doesn't have a deep soul like Oistrakh or Mehumin.
Yes Right ....Rudolf Schwarz,,,,another KING.... How much Jews gave ;....and people hate them for .....WHAT, You need Motivation and hard work ....and Talant...
Yes Right ....Rudolf Schwarz,,,,another KING.... How much Jews gave ;....and people hate them for .....WHAT, You need Motivstion and hard work ....and Talant...
so fast! I keep expecting that because of the speed at which he's started a phrase he'll have to screw it up to maintain the logic and the music, but nope! amazing! I feel like he's thinking at least 3 phrases ahead at all times!
He seems a little worn out at the end, the way he drops his bow right after playing. I can't imagine how tired he must be after playing the Brahms Violin Concerto.
I love Oistrakh and love his technique and everything about him, but I don't feel the passion in this performance. This movement seems too easy for him.
I am proud to say I own a vinyl of this performance. Absolutely stunning. Oistrakh playing Bruch is similarly amazing. Prokoviov is well done as well, so is the Beethoven and Mendelssohn. In the tradition of Auer though, his Tchaikovsky is lacking; his interpretation makes him seem like a timid violinist, instead of the amazing powerhouse of a player he is.
welcome to the -10 rating... but jesus that 100 pound bow arm slams and scratch, scratch, slam, squeak,....too staccato.. as always he has his moments and plays low notes with a nice warm tone but the high notes are awfully squeaky...... I love his Debussy and that's more up his alley. This is Heifetz territory and only a rabid Oistrakh fan would think otherwise.
Wunderbar, pitch perfect brahms. Oistrakh understands the gypsy essence of this final movement. He displays a wonderful balance of moderately restrained passion ,and outstanding technique. In addition, he never gets sentimental, this last attribute would really make Johannes beam.
I had the privilege of playing in an orchestra that he conducted some years ago. He could not speak a word of English but the results were extraordinary nonetheless. Having just listened to Shaham's version with Berlin, I have to give the edge to Oistrakh.
Rudolf Schwarz's unusual conducting technique was the result of physical injuries received in a Nazi concentration camp during WW2, as he had the misfortune to be Jewish! But it's the result that counts! A much underrated conductor! (In Britain he was principal conductor of the Bournmouth, City of Birmingham and BBC Symphony Orchestras.)
That wrist action and pointing the baton downwards (as if to say the beat is . . . here!) is a result of injury? Interesting. I like the style -- very authoritative and detached. Matches Oistrakh's.
I found out, shortly after having post the comment, that in the second part of the video a comment says he's Rudolf Schwarz. You may have noticed that too =)
I have to say, I am really beginning to prefer this 'forceful' approach to Brahms, of this performance, and also the Furtwaengler version of the last mvt of Brahms 4 (also on YouTube). It seems to have a bit more integrity than all these modern slower, more luxurious (Solti, Barenboim, Rattle, Dohnanyi) versions.
i actually prefer it slow, if you listen to the other version by kermer Berstein its sounds like it's missing something try comaparing both you can hear the difference.
this music is so incredible. it seems so weird to see people performing it, it's so strongly associated with there will be blood at this point you forget that it wasn't exactly written yesterday.
Hi, I'm smart.
I love my boy's jacket there. That guy's so cool.
I was just so bowled over and thrilled to hear one of my absolute favorite pieces in the middle of that depressing (though great) movie that it didn't even occur to me at the time to consider what PTA was saying by including it. It seems so out of context in the time and place being portrayed that it can't just be the right sound for that part of the film; there has to be some meaning (and, of course, perhaps not!). Any ideas what it meant in the film?
I think he's trying to say that life is beautiful.
I would also use the expression from No contry for Old Man -- You can't change what's comming to You .. That's vanity.
Or greek-- Haracter is fate. Sometimes the strainghs that held us win , also leed to our down fall. But life is beautiful none the less. Great music. Great acting, almoust commical at times.
stavropol - Good observation! His bow is tight because that was the way they taught in the Russian school of violin playing. Check out Tossy Spivakovsky. However some bows were designed that way. Oistrakh used a bow by Andre Georges Richaume (b.1905 - d.1966). I have a Francois Nicolas Voirin (c.1870) that plays best if somewhat tighter than most bows. It was the design and camber that makes it that way. I'm not sure what a Richaume is valued at but my Voirin is valued at $48K!!
Actually, the Russian school of bowing advocated relatively loose bow hair. Oistrakh started out with the Russian bowing technique, but later adopted the Franco-Belgian bowing, which was then used in the Soviet school of violin-playing. Elman, Heifetz, and Milstein used bow holds that were easily identifiable as Russian.
Like omg what is he wearing! Defnitly great sound and interpretation but something tells me that he might have been a bit of a diva like the little "hmpph" pose he takes at 3:53. But i just love how he does the chords at 2:00 and how powerful the last one is at 2:05, amazing performance, when was this taken?
I am an atheist, but if I chose to worship a god, it would be the playing of David Oistrakh. It almost seems as if the violin were speaking. it is scary that a human could play like he did.
The finales of all of them (except for the Beethoven, as the first movement is the best) are the greatest in the violin repertoire (which includes sonatas, suites, fantasies, etcetera).
Heifetz.Oistrakh. Niveu.Kreisler is wonderful in this. Chung always!Hahn touching always.Bellnot heard in this.I love his heartines! Shaham !!.Kremer with Karajan better th live Bernstein but th s special too .EricaMorini not heard.Szigeti not heard. Vengerov several times is always grt in this concerto. I havent heard a bad performance yet. Maybe some hischoolers .this is impossibly difficult and u have to be heard n intricate writing.I wanna hear Joachims concerto.Prolly posted here too.
Why are people still trying to figure out who the best is. you would have to know nothing about music the piece of music if you were able to pick the best performance of a work
well let´s not turn the discussion into if kogan was less musical than oistrakh...but i cannot get over recommending you,to listen,how kogan plays the paganini cantabile,here in youtube.
oistrakh was not a prodigy...but who cares,yeah,kogan was better than oistrakh,but if you ask me kogan was even better than heifetz...but oistrakh,served this world as a teacher,as a conductor,as a violinist,he was a real humanist,i respect oistrakh a lot.
oistrakh was a violinist,with the warmest tone...he was the singer of violin,had a good technic.a great teacher.a wunderfull man.but technically there were others they could also play violin,but hadn´t the value oistrakh has treasured.
Oistrakh is the example of what someone can achieve mostly through sheer work dedication. Not being a child prodigy he built his technique and musician craftsmanship through practice and patience. This the best way to get complete confidence in your own ability. Always a pleasure to hear musician like him playing. Especially when one remembers where he was living and when!
Love the shift at 1:23
periola 2 months ago
King of brahms :)
OkajowNawojka 2 months ago
unbelivable performance beautifull it REALY touch the soul
moshiko7701 7 months ago
who is idiot that click on dislike?¿
it's impossible
violinynada 7 months ago
who is idiot that click on dislike?¿
it's impossible
violinynada 7 months ago
I prefer Heifetz
villars91 8 months ago
Nie ma to jak se pomachać kijem :D
KofsonBkwc 9 months ago
"I drink your MILKSHAKE..."
knockoffnigel123 9 months ago
Where is the music? This is not music; it is sheer ego tug 'n pull. He played it too aggressive, unpoetic, and on the mechanical side.
The orchestra wasn't of high caliber too. I can't believe how people are overrating this performance; it isn't even musical. I recalled Oistrakh did a better job of this concerto in a LP recording.
freeqwerqwer 9 months ago
@freeqwerqwer The orchestra seems to be VERY high caliber to me.
tlcooper93 8 months ago
@freeqwerqwer Can you play this?
Razpewtin 7 months ago
@Razpewtin , no I can't play it but I know how it should sound.
freeqwerqwer 7 months ago
@freeqwerqwer Hello, I am a violin player and I do play this tune. This is my favorite repertoire, and also I do know ho it should sound as you do (maybe I am better cause I can play this movement). This recording it the best I have ever heard. Well, if you want something not "aggressive", listen to Klemperer (1958) version, but this is still one of the best. If you can't play this virtuosic movement, you need to think more and be respectful to this historic performance.
Oistrakhfollower 6 months ago
@Oistrakhfollower , Oistrak's Beethoven is broad rich tone, powerful, and melodic but I also like Mehuhim's Beethoven too which is more subdued, humble, respectful of the orchestra, and his sweet tone is charming too. I think Perlam's Beethoven is more faithful to the score but Perlman doesn't have a deep soul like Oistrakh or Mehumin.
leopianotuner 6 months ago
Oistrakh never ceases to amaze me. It's not just his execution it's his interpretation -- the man is a beast of interpretation of the highest order.
veeken77 11 months ago 2
did anyone else notice the concermaster mess up the bowing in the beginning at around 0:39? haha
mannycabrito 11 months ago
All of replies are true.
That's why I'm his loyal follwer (look at my name).
Oistrakhfollower 1 year ago
My favorite performer of this concerto, bar none. A master.
wichitazen 1 year ago 2
Look how fluid his fingers are!
/jealous
azndaemon95 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes Right ....Rudolf Schwarz,,,,another KING.... How much Jews gave ;....and people hate them for .....WHAT, You need Motivation and hard work ....and Talant...
TheEmmochka 1 year ago
Yes Right ....Rudolf Schwarz,,,,another KING.... How much Jews gave ;....and people hate them for .....WHAT, You need Motivstion and hard work ....and Talant...
TheEmmochka 1 year ago
Yes Right ....Rudolf Schwarz,,,,another KING.... How much Jews gave ;....and people hate them for .....WHAT
TheEmmochka 1 year ago
I was little girl when I watch him on Russian TV. Yes ...KING ...DAVID and almost all of them are Jewish people...
TheEmmochka 1 year ago
@TheEmmochka he was Russian
gnatural 1 year ago
I was little girl when I watch him on Russian TV. Yes ...KING ...DAVID
TheEmmochka 1 year ago
The best! Best and warmest tone with a singing voice!!!! Strong with the power of Real LOVE!!!
stoklund 1 year ago
I won't call David the BEST OF ALL because one cannot compare different styles and interpretations, but Oistrakh is definitely top notch
runninriot15 1 year ago
Henryk Szeryng is the best.
classicalmusic1000 1 year ago
look at cristian ferras, very nice and great taste of frasing
TheGaetano62 1 year ago
Perfetto e intonatissimo !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sei grandissimo David Oistrakh
Musicaclassica97 1 year ago
so fast! I keep expecting that because of the speed at which he's started a phrase he'll have to screw it up to maintain the logic and the music, but nope! amazing! I feel like he's thinking at least 3 phrases ahead at all times!
weezeedee 1 year ago
PERFECT.
TerentiaWillsomethin 1 year ago
I love,love love,love this beautiful piece played by David Oistrakh
AKSTERSKY 1 year ago
A Beast....thats how Brahms should be played :O
yscslim 1 year ago 2
Is Oistrakh the best? I heard Nathan Milstein is not bad:
watch?v=qWK4jtOwQ-8
classicvinylbiz 1 year ago
haha what is that conductor doing? - swiveling his baton while swiveling his arms
vuth94 1 year ago
He seems a little worn out at the end, the way he drops his bow right after playing. I can't imagine how tired he must be after playing the Brahms Violin Concerto.
tlcooper93 1 year ago
I love Oistrakh and love his technique and everything about him, but I don't feel the passion in this performance. This movement seems too easy for him.
bryan21tx 1 year ago
the passion is undeniable,my favorite
harlemaudio 1 year ago 3
thats real Bramhs!
Exceptional!
Sound is so profond!
yscslim 1 year ago 3
I am proud to say I own a vinyl of this performance. Absolutely stunning. Oistrakh playing Bruch is similarly amazing. Prokoviov is well done as well, so is the Beethoven and Mendelssohn. In the tradition of Auer though, his Tchaikovsky is lacking; his interpretation makes him seem like a timid violinist, instead of the amazing powerhouse of a player he is.
GeorgeMaj15 1 year ago 3
welcome to the -10 rating... but jesus that 100 pound bow arm slams and scratch, scratch, slam, squeak,....too staccato.. as always he has his moments and plays low notes with a nice warm tone but the high notes are awfully squeaky...... I love his Debussy and that's more up his alley. This is Heifetz territory and only a rabid Oistrakh fan would think otherwise.
Ingenue001 1 year ago
Cant find it on EMI´s DVDs. Damn.
Mnacuspia004 2 years ago
@Mnacuspia004 look at : David Oistrakh; The Complete EMI Recordings - CD6
auchlimpi 1 year ago
Absolutely the best....never better.....the king of violinists.
raoultak 2 years ago 15
This has been flagged as spam show
@raoultak haha ur jokin right
gibsonpaddy 2 years ago
Wunderbar, pitch perfect brahms. Oistrakh understands the gypsy essence of this final movement. He displays a wonderful balance of moderately restrained passion ,and outstanding technique. In addition, he never gets sentimental, this last attribute would really make Johannes beam.
goethethegreat 2 years ago 3
Ja, dass ist schoen wunderbar, aus gezeichnet... raven
ravenCLI 2 years ago
I had the privilege of playing in an orchestra that he conducted some years ago. He could not speak a word of English but the results were extraordinary nonetheless. Having just listened to Shaham's version with Berlin, I have to give the edge to Oistrakh.
bult15 2 years ago 4
Rudolf Schwarz's unusual conducting technique was the result of physical injuries received in a Nazi concentration camp during WW2, as he had the misfortune to be Jewish! But it's the result that counts! A much underrated conductor! (In Britain he was principal conductor of the Bournmouth, City of Birmingham and BBC Symphony Orchestras.)
garryph 2 years ago 3
That wrist action and pointing the baton downwards (as if to say the beat is . . . here!) is a result of injury? Interesting. I like the style -- very authoritative and detached. Matches Oistrakh's.
MikeDrewYT 2 years ago
Ohh the sound is very very clear for an old recording , or is it Oistrakh dunno but im thrilled either way:D
iluminada333 2 years ago
I'm sure many people already asked this, but who's the conductor?
stomentendo 3 years ago
Is he Bolt?
brianfan1 3 years ago
I found out, shortly after having post the comment, that in the second part of the video a comment says he's Rudolf Schwarz. You may have noticed that too =)
stomentendo 3 years ago
thanks!
brianfan1 3 years ago
Is his baton technique an old-school trip or what?
MikeDrewYT 2 years ago 4
HAHAHAHAHA so true
gnatural 2 years ago
I have to say, I am really beginning to prefer this 'forceful' approach to Brahms, of this performance, and also the Furtwaengler version of the last mvt of Brahms 4 (also on YouTube). It seems to have a bit more integrity than all these modern slower, more luxurious (Solti, Barenboim, Rattle, Dohnanyi) versions.
LDGuy 3 years ago
i actually prefer it slow, if you listen to the other version by kermer Berstein its sounds like it's missing something try comaparing both you can hear the difference.
eazy3b 3 years ago
mejor lo toca szeryng
fitoviolinista 3 years ago
this music is so incredible. it seems so weird to see people performing it, it's so strongly associated with there will be blood at this point you forget that it wasn't exactly written yesterday.
Hi, I'm smart.
I love my boy's jacket there. That guy's so cool.
mizzohizzy220 3 years ago 3
I was just so bowled over and thrilled to hear one of my absolute favorite pieces in the middle of that depressing (though great) movie that it didn't even occur to me at the time to consider what PTA was saying by including it. It seems so out of context in the time and place being portrayed that it can't just be the right sound for that part of the film; there has to be some meaning (and, of course, perhaps not!). Any ideas what it meant in the film?
MikeDrewYT 3 years ago
I think he's trying to say that life is beautiful.
I would also use the expression from No contry for Old Man -- You can't change what's comming to You .. That's vanity.
Or greek-- Haracter is fate. Sometimes the strainghs that held us win , also leed to our down fall. But life is beautiful none the less. Great music. Great acting, almoust commical at times.
victorykn 2 years ago
This is really good, I just think is a bit slow.
mavadd88 3 years ago
I wanna know if this recording is on sale, edited in dvd by EMI or deutsche grammophon, or SOMETHING.. i want to have it!!
Mnacuspia004 3 years ago
yes, by emi. go and get it, and stop shutting up violinists
apporo 3 years ago
stavropol - Good observation! His bow is tight because that was the way they taught in the Russian school of violin playing. Check out Tossy Spivakovsky. However some bows were designed that way. Oistrakh used a bow by Andre Georges Richaume (b.1905 - d.1966). I have a Francois Nicolas Voirin (c.1870) that plays best if somewhat tighter than most bows. It was the design and camber that makes it that way. I'm not sure what a Richaume is valued at but my Voirin is valued at $48K!!
violindave2 3 years ago
Actually, the Russian school of bowing advocated relatively loose bow hair. Oistrakh started out with the Russian bowing technique, but later adopted the Franco-Belgian bowing, which was then used in the Soviet school of violin-playing. Elman, Heifetz, and Milstein used bow holds that were easily identifiable as Russian.
Kyriaeus 3 years ago
oh shut up man, we REALLY dont want to know a shit about your instrument.
Mnacuspia004 3 years ago
ASTONISHING!
sll10 3 years ago 4
I agree with that...Ostraikh is just amazing...
nico22059 3 years ago 3
wow, his bow is tight.
stavropol 3 years ago
AMAZING!
singinginachurch 3 years ago 3
Maestro!!! Before Perlman made my (living) favorite, here you are...
optimaver 3 years ago
Tremendous!
bondman24 3 years ago 2
then you have no heart :) just kidding.
hoopsmaster13 3 years ago
Oistrakh at his technical best... When compared to the Szeryng and Milstein videos of this same piece, Oistrakh kicks their asses
issagele 3 years ago 2
Id like to play this in a murder movie or something!
good2gosrmerc 3 years ago
What are you talking about, good2gosrmerc and TheForgottenPanzer?
hoopsmaster13 3 years ago
THERE WILL BE BLOOD !
Awesome :-D
TheForgottenPanzer 3 years ago
Like omg what is he wearing! Defnitly great sound and interpretation but something tells me that he might have been a bit of a diva like the little "hmpph" pose he takes at 3:53. But i just love how he does the chords at 2:00 and how powerful the last one is at 2:05, amazing performance, when was this taken?
senortinfoil1 3 years ago
I'm finished!
chillybeans27 3 years ago
at the end of there will be blood...jaja
nukerbreath 3 years ago
really he's the best...
josegiar 3 years ago 4
I am an atheist, but if I chose to worship a god, it would be the playing of David Oistrakh. It almost seems as if the violin were speaking. it is scary that a human could play like he did.
Brahmsfourth 3 years ago 3
Glad to see I'm not the only one who enjoys Classical music :)
HaxIRL 3 years ago 2
finally, I've found this! I heard it on There Will Be Blood and fell in love.
SiXELApurple 3 years ago 3
If you liked this try the Mendelssohn, Beethoven, Tchaikovsky and Bruch violin concerti as well :)
PianistSk8er 3 years ago
The finales of all of them (except for the Beethoven, as the first movement is the best) are the greatest in the violin repertoire (which includes sonatas, suites, fantasies, etcetera).
ThaSchwab 3 years ago
ThsSchwab:
What about Tchaikovsky? You think the third movment's better than the first?
hoopsmaster13 3 years ago
Yep.
ThaSchwab 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
His playing is somewhat similar to Kyung-Wha Chung's.
lad601 3 years ago
no.. Kyung Wha Chung's playing is somewhat similar to his.. not vise versa..
Seriously cmon, how can you compare the two?
mshakhz 3 years ago 4
Why not? I think Kyung Wha Chung is one of the greatest violinists.
Fr3derick 3 years ago
WIth all due respect to Kyung Wha Chung, David Oistrakh is in a completely different league.
In my opinion, not even close.
GreatPianists 3 years ago 9
ta pa un 10
ginsberguru 3 years ago
Oistrakh is God!!!! So smooth.
archives4891 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I must admit I don't like his interpretation.
Gonnakillyou 3 years ago
I'm finished!
chrisgivens 3 years ago
All virtuosi mentioned really exhibit an astounding capability, to be in agreement. "Best" is as elusive as taste, unfortunately.
A more practical question I have is can anyone answer who Oistrakh is performing w/?
benditlikeawhale 3 years ago
Gloriouos Oistrakh!!!
C'est magnifique!!!
C'est formidable!!!
alberichnib 3 years ago 2
god, Oistrak like totally OWN THIS PIECE
jefftam1234 3 years ago
i love this song!
cfrontz 3 years ago
Heifetz.Oistrakh. Niveu.Kreisler is wonderful in this. Chung always!Hahn touching always.Bellnot heard in this.I love his heartines! Shaham !!.Kremer with Karajan better th live Bernstein but th s special too .EricaMorini not heard.Szigeti not heard. Vengerov several times is always grt in this concerto. I havent heard a bad performance yet. Maybe some hischoolers .this is impossibly difficult and u have to be heard n intricate writing.I wanna hear Joachims concerto.Prolly posted here too.
lovesGenet 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
heh... abburidotakaria... what a fruitcake
fiddlinmatt 3 years ago
Why are people still trying to figure out who the best is. you would have to know nothing about music the piece of music if you were able to pick the best performance of a work
jascha1978 4 years ago
at least now i know im not the only one who thinks so!
th0ma5laxc 3 years ago
ya true Oistrakh is the best.... some say its heifetz, but its a different style of performance.
Loryos 4 years ago
This one is very good, too. Oistrakh shows great
music. Thanks for posting this video!
My favorite version is the one Heifetz recorded with CSO, conduct by Reiner. God.. I wish Heifetz left his video recording of that version.
chihhaochao 4 years ago
absolutely the best brahms' concert execution.
oistrakh is the best violinist ever
violinobserver 4 years ago 19
i am absolutely agree with you. He gives to the concerto very hard human feelings.
Oistrakh was almost a god.
Mnacuspia004 4 years ago
well...abboridotakaria...there you leave someone nothing else to say as,what would a donkey taste by a delicious french Onionsoup...
bahotheviolon 4 years ago 2
well let´s not turn the discussion into if kogan was less musical than oistrakh...but i cannot get over recommending you,to listen,how kogan plays the paganini cantabile,here in youtube.
bahotheviolon 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
eh, I don't think it is anything special... I've heard conservatory students play it better than him.
abburidotakaria 4 years ago
your wrong. If that's true, then why aren't they famous huu?
chyuviolinist 4 years ago
hey: There is many people famous with bad musicality. If you chek Vengerov´s beethoven violinconcerto, you get bored if you don´t look his face. hehe
Mnacuspia004 4 years ago
oistrakh was not a prodigy...but who cares,yeah,kogan was better than oistrakh,but if you ask me kogan was even better than heifetz...but oistrakh,served this world as a teacher,as a conductor,as a violinist,he was a real humanist,i respect oistrakh a lot.
bahotheviolon 4 years ago 2
kogan may be technically better than oistrakh, but oistrakh's musicaly and insights into the music are light year's ahead of kogan's...
abburidotakaria 4 years ago
oistrakh was a violinist,with the warmest tone...he was the singer of violin,had a good technic.a great teacher.a wunderfull man.but technically there were others they could also play violin,but hadn´t the value oistrakh has treasured.
bahotheviolon 4 years ago 4
Oistrakh is the example of what someone can achieve mostly through sheer work dedication. Not being a child prodigy he built his technique and musician craftsmanship through practice and patience. This the best way to get complete confidence in your own ability. Always a pleasure to hear musician like him playing. Especially when one remembers where he was living and when!
jarny2 4 years ago
All the greats of violin had their own, wonderful interpretations of this concerto. My favorites for Brahms are Heifetz, Szeryng, and Oistrakh.
The way he plays those octaves...mindblowing.
GreatPianists 4 years ago
Milstein has an incredible version of this on youtube. I prefer it but this is great too.
commandercool069 4 years ago
how about szeryng?
nathanbob12 4 years ago
of course.he is always sooooooooooo perfect.his sibelius is also...soooo good
kotomalamitsosos 4 years ago
Typical Oistrakh. Integrity, stamina, perfect control...
Couldn't ask for more...just great.
GreatPianists 4 years ago
Omg... Oistrakh remains the best violinist. His recording of the Tchaik and the Brahms are unsurpassable
Violaghost 4 years ago
100% agree with you about his Brahms and Tchaikovsky. Don't forget his Khachaturian and Shostakovich. I still can't find anyone who can top his.
nibelungensohn 4 years ago
wow! even better than the video recorded in 1966!
govibe 4 years ago
wow, this is so amazing... there used to be a video of the entire concerto up, but this'll do lol.
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago