What about the moon? I wish we could explain it. Expanding Earth makes sense. Our moon does not. If the Earth was once smaller than the moon would not be a satellite.
this guy is right, no need for 100 yrs of scientific investigation, it is just as simple as truth, all makes sense and has common sense. specially this would explain how in hell there are fish fossils so high in mountains, and how the dinasours could breath, because the oxygen was much more compacter and rich air for them.
makes 100 times more sense than stupid pangea stuff...
@patan77 If the Earth was smaller, gravity would be lower, and the atmosphere less dense, actually, if the Earth was too small, it would be able to hold onto it's atmosphere, it be like the moon. So no, a smaller Earth doesn't make a thicker atmosphere, it's the opposite.
@Diamonddavej The atmosphere was thicker in the old Earth. Allowed 3' wingspan dragonflies to fly. CO2 was far higher. Lots of our atmosphere is now Limestone, chalk and oil etc.
Also, dinosaurs cannot exist in our gravity.
i.e. Make a man 12' tall, he will weigh 8x as much (h2 x w2 x d2) but his bones will ony be able to support 4x his weight. (w2 x d2).
I read your book. It seems to me that after cooling of crust , earth was an oceanic planet that'why for billions life was only underwater. Than because of spreading of univers and very important asteriod adding mass it began to grow. Big Asteroid would impact first in Cambrian era, then on on Perminan (cracking crust for Pacific ocean) then during Cretacic opening crust for Atlantic.
Dr. Maxlow, I got yr book TERRA NO FIRMA. Was Earth an oceanic planet (as Europa satelit) during PHASE 2? For 3 billions years only underwater life!! Page 44 : how could Gigantosauro frm Patagonia surliveif during Triassic and Jurassic were in the south pole? Wasn't earth tilted at that time? Claudia
@MsArgentana if you read Genesis chapters 6 and 7, you'll discover that the Earth was completely flooded over for a hundred fifty days, hence all the various fossils of marine life found on mountain tops.
Dr. Maxlow, I got yr book TERRA NO FIRMA here in Italy.
Was Earth a oceanic planet (as Europa satelit) during PHASE 2? for 3 billions years only underwater life!! Page 44 : how could Gigantosauro frm Patagonia surlive in darkness if during Triassic and Jurassic were in the south pole? Wasn't earth tilted at that time? Tks for answering. Claudia
That is interesting what he says about mass extinctions connected to the draining of the ancient Atlantic-Indian Ocean to the Pacific Ocean over an 8 - 10 million year period. But it makes me think, wouldn't these animals be able to adapt over such a long period of time?
On a different note, I wonder what his thoughts are on the KT boundary?
Agreed. The animations are kinda lame, and the presentation kinda dry. Neal's vids are very good. On the other hand, too bad important topics like this require "marketing" skills. You'd think honest scientific curiosity would be enough to spread the discussion.
There's no honest scientific curiosity; We live in a socialist theocracy where Science, with a capital S, is dictated from the top.
Just look at AGW if you don't believe me. What is the IPCC but a new division of the church of statism to command to us the earth is flat?
Expanding earth and Electric universe theories are fantastic in how well they fit the evidence. But state planned "Science" has no room for the facts. If you're not producing justifications for power they don't want to hear it
What about the moon? I wish we could explain it. Expanding Earth makes sense. Our moon does not. If the Earth was once smaller than the moon would not be a satellite.
Kellylynn1985 1 year ago
@Kellylynn1985
unless gravity is actually an effect of a push (pressure) instead of a pull.
Aleksandrgrc 11 months ago
this guy is right, no need for 100 yrs of scientific investigation, it is just as simple as truth, all makes sense and has common sense. specially this would explain how in hell there are fish fossils so high in mountains, and how the dinasours could breath, because the oxygen was much more compacter and rich air for them.
makes 100 times more sense than stupid pangea stuff...
patan77 1 year ago
@patan77 If the Earth was smaller, gravity would be lower, and the atmosphere less dense, actually, if the Earth was too small, it would be able to hold onto it's atmosphere, it be like the moon. So no, a smaller Earth doesn't make a thicker atmosphere, it's the opposite.
Diamonddavej 6 months ago
@Diamonddavej The atmosphere was thicker in the old Earth. Allowed 3' wingspan dragonflies to fly. CO2 was far higher. Lots of our atmosphere is now Limestone, chalk and oil etc.
Also, dinosaurs cannot exist in our gravity.
i.e. Make a man 12' tall, he will weigh 8x as much (h2 x w2 x d2) but his bones will ony be able to support 4x his weight. (w2 x d2).
m1aws 5 months ago
For clearer video representation, do a search on "neal adams" and go to his site.
wakauai7wsxedcrfvqaz 1 year ago
I read your book. It seems to me that after cooling of crust , earth was an oceanic planet that'why for billions life was only underwater. Than because of spreading of univers and very important asteriod adding mass it began to grow. Big Asteroid would impact first in Cambrian era, then on on Perminan (cracking crust for Pacific ocean) then during Cretacic opening crust for Atlantic.
MsArgentana 1 year ago
Dr. Maxlow, I got yr book TERRA NO FIRMA. Was Earth an oceanic planet (as Europa satelit) during PHASE 2? For 3 billions years only underwater life!! Page 44 : how could Gigantosauro frm Patagonia surliveif during Triassic and Jurassic were in the south pole? Wasn't earth tilted at that time? Claudia
MsArgentana 1 year ago
@MsArgentana if you read Genesis chapters 6 and 7, you'll discover that the Earth was completely flooded over for a hundred fifty days, hence all the various fossils of marine life found on mountain tops.
RazberriTwist 1 year ago
Dr. Maxlow, I got yr book TERRA NO FIRMA here in Italy.
Was Earth a oceanic planet (as Europa satelit) during PHASE 2? for 3 billions years only underwater life!! Page 44 : how could Gigantosauro frm Patagonia surlive in darkness if during Triassic and Jurassic were in the south pole? Wasn't earth tilted at that time? Tks for answering. Claudia
MsArgentana 1 year ago
I was interested but it was difficult to understand anything on the visual
Uzibit 2 years ago
That is interesting what he says about mass extinctions connected to the draining of the ancient Atlantic-Indian Ocean to the Pacific Ocean over an 8 - 10 million year period. But it makes me think, wouldn't these animals be able to adapt over such a long period of time?
On a different note, I wonder what his thoughts are on the KT boundary?
Interesting stuff.
huyked 2 years ago
@huyked
yes
ezcondition 6 months ago
Agreed. The animations are kinda lame, and the presentation kinda dry. Neal's vids are very good. On the other hand, too bad important topics like this require "marketing" skills. You'd think honest scientific curiosity would be enough to spread the discussion.
etzel33 2 years ago
There's no honest scientific curiosity; We live in a socialist theocracy where Science, with a capital S, is dictated from the top.
Just look at AGW if you don't believe me. What is the IPCC but a new division of the church of statism to command to us the earth is flat?
Expanding earth and Electric universe theories are fantastic in how well they fit the evidence. But state planned "Science" has no room for the facts. If you're not producing justifications for power they don't want to hear it
Individualism101 1 year ago 2
the visuals are so terrible. this theory combined with proper visualization might would spread like gospel
ak231603 3 years ago
I can't see squat on that spinning sphere. This isn't visually conveying anything significant.
jjnature 3 years ago
no comments on this?
dumbnetworks 3 years ago