though written or spoken through elitist literature, I think that the message Bhabha is trying to convey is quite comprehensible for those who really want to COMPREHEND.
the people who are passing vile comments are simply reacting to the sheer size of the mental deluge gushing through the various cavities of their constipated souls clogged with greasy moss of dead habits, rusted in the hard wind of rapacious ignorance.
I was a student of Homi's at U Chicago (grad). While interesting, sometimes he seems to be more interesting than offering anything you can really understand. He is therefore a darling of other academics, which is of no surprise. He has mastered the art of the vague that sounds profound. I will say that I like him, though.
Emeritus professor of English at Stanford University, Marjorie Perloff, said that her reaction to Bhabha's appointment at Harvard was one of "dismay," telling the New York Times "He doesn't have anything to say." While Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of media studies at New York University, commented on the meaning of Bhabha's writing: "One could finally argue that there is no meaning there, beyond the neologisms and Latinate buzzwords. Most of the time I don't know what he's talking about."
Homi Bhabha is quite difficult, but his theories invite others to "think beyond the trerrains...that have been plowed by others." This remarkable author does not deserve ridicule from hostile readers who fail to understand him, but rather deserves considered, mindful, analysis and contextualized responses.
It really doesn't matter whether or not you like, dislike, get or reject Bhabha's tongue. The only thing that does matter is that we will be speaking his currently unfamiliar language in 100 years time and not in the dichotomies that split science from art, black from white, male from female, elite from citizen and so on.........
The man is significant to the world of post-structural analysis especially in relation to global consumption. It's no good to look at the world in terms of material and ideological investments as the language used to define such things is deeply immersed in polemics. Just look at the discourse of denial and disaster that dominates and splits our sense of the environment. Bhabha simply provides us with a language that can locate such dichotomies and re-evalute them in terms of our current state.
You guys are obviously morons. If nothing else, what gives that away is the way you have turned your ignorance and sense of intellectual inferiority and impotence into violence and insult against the guy who doesn't have your problem! Homi Bhabha is a brilliant man, you guys are ignorant bats. The happy fact is that tomorrow you are going to die, disintegrate and disappear, while he, his name and his ideas are going to stay for ages to come.
I can understand what he is saying at least as well as he can. The problem is that beneath the dressing of jargonese his points are no more than trite clichés and contemporary platitudes. I am a philosophy student (unlike Bhabha) and have to deal with Kant and Hegel. They're difficult to read because the difficulty of their thought. Bhahba's thought is easy. He's difficult to read because he dresses his thought up in meaningless jargon in order to seem cleverer than he is.
@Alessandro1985 I agree. I actually laughed at when he started his presentation by saying that his extract from Foucault creates a feeling of ambivalence in him - as that's pretty much the only thing he has to say about anything.
Homi Bhabha is symptomatic of the third-rate, jargon-ridden pseudo-philosophy being sold off in the comparative-literature departments. This is junk-food for the mind, there's a reason it's not read in the actual philosophy departments (just by English profs pretending to be philosophers). Your argument that he'll be remembered by posterity is vacuous. Britney Spears will also have a posthumous reception.
I'm afraid the reason you see Bhabha in the terms you have described is simply that your traditional training in philosophy and your strong investment in it being important and true forces your mind to see and interpret the world in a strictly polarized fashion, which is in fact precisely what Bhabha is fighting against. So no wonder to you he deserves all the adjectives you have listed. Philosophy is indeed a very dangerous tradition.
A brilliant con man. Quite possibly the greatest intellectual scam artist in the academy today. Behind that wall of pretentious nonsense, I can hear the laughter of a stunningly intelligent joker as he cashes his pay cheque at the bank.
The strange thing is how anybody in the audience manages to keep themselves from laughing. All the American students are, no doubt, sitting there, with an attentive expression on their faces, as if they were listening to an intelligent speech. In reality, Bhabha strings together random combinations of pseudo-academic jargo and lingo, maybe occasionally rising to make a meaningful but unfortunately vacuous point.
He sounds like a comedian doing an impression of a comedian doing an impression of an incomprehensible idiot. His fake English accent is hilarious. His brain has turned into post-modernist goo. And all that's left is an indian with an edwardian accent.
but sorry to comment on "higher7000" who said that was nonsense. sorry to "it" that he/she didn't understand him. at least u should thank him b/c of his wanderful speech.
I honestly don't think he really said anything overly difficult or incomprehensible in this talk.
SeedsofJoy 2 months ago
its like watching someone take an hour and a half to blow their nose
jemimallah 3 months ago
BHABHA AND HIS FAG TALK AGAIN
retrodrood 4 months ago
though written or spoken through elitist literature, I think that the message Bhabha is trying to convey is quite comprehensible for those who really want to COMPREHEND.
fayebabacar 7 months ago in playlist ,,,,,,,, 2
if you actually figure out what he's saying, it's very interesting.
bigman25plus25 7 months ago 2
@bigman25plus25 Get an education
scholar1972 5 months ago in playlist literature
Ditto to what all the smart people said...which is essentially the question, "what the hell is the ol' guy rambling about now?"
45acrobat 8 months ago
the people who are passing vile comments are simply reacting to the sheer size of the mental deluge gushing through the various cavities of their constipated souls clogged with greasy moss of dead habits, rusted in the hard wind of rapacious ignorance.
aburashdan 8 months ago
"He has mastered the art of the vague that sounds profound" - wow that's a fine smirk!
2010desigirl 8 months ago
Big Words. Small ideas.
Numetalsucks 10 months ago
I was a student of Homi's at U Chicago (grad). While interesting, sometimes he seems to be more interesting than offering anything you can really understand. He is therefore a darling of other academics, which is of no surprise. He has mastered the art of the vague that sounds profound. I will say that I like him, though.
BruceBBaldwin100 10 months ago 2
Emeritus professor of English at Stanford University, Marjorie Perloff, said that her reaction to Bhabha's appointment at Harvard was one of "dismay," telling the New York Times "He doesn't have anything to say." While Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of media studies at New York University, commented on the meaning of Bhabha's writing: "One could finally argue that there is no meaning there, beyond the neologisms and Latinate buzzwords. Most of the time I don't know what he's talking about."
sensibilita88 11 months ago
pretentious self-infatuated tosspot.
dylantisdell 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
4f7u6c1k 1 year ago
the responses for this video make me want to cry... have you never read a book!? really?!
k1138tx 1 year ago
Homi Bhabha is quite difficult, but his theories invite others to "think beyond the trerrains...that have been plowed by others." This remarkable author does not deserve ridicule from hostile readers who fail to understand him, but rather deserves considered, mindful, analysis and contextualized responses.
gemcculloh 1 year ago 4
Such an awful old name dropper too - 'accelerated speed' as Derrida says' etc etc.
sibionic 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Too many haters..lol
If you can't stand the guy, why are you even bothering to search for his vids. to comment?
Not a single comment taking apart what he says, just how he says it and a lot of personal stuff too.
bajaninthesun 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It really doesn't matter whether or not you like, dislike, get or reject Bhabha's tongue. The only thing that does matter is that we will be speaking his currently unfamiliar language in 100 years time and not in the dichotomies that split science from art, black from white, male from female, elite from citizen and so on.........
seahawk75 1 year ago
The man is significant to the world of post-structural analysis especially in relation to global consumption. It's no good to look at the world in terms of material and ideological investments as the language used to define such things is deeply immersed in polemics. Just look at the discourse of denial and disaster that dominates and splits our sense of the environment. Bhabha simply provides us with a language that can locate such dichotomies and re-evalute them in terms of our current state.
seahawk75 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Excellent Lecture. For those of you who find it incomprehensible, that's simply unfortunate.
jaimung2 1 year ago
@jaimung2 AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Xenophanes21 1 year ago
Yall just dont like him cuz your all racist.
et6yEhzxexzhrz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Aye at first I thought his writing and speech was wtf, but it's actually not bad.
He realises that his work can be indecipherable but he's justified that many times over.
If you don't understand him or don't attempt to, then just don't bother watching/reading n leaving dumb comments
revontulet 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You guys are obviously morons. If nothing else, what gives that away is the way you have turned your ignorance and sense of intellectual inferiority and impotence into violence and insult against the guy who doesn't have your problem! Homi Bhabha is a brilliant man, you guys are ignorant bats. The happy fact is that tomorrow you are going to die, disintegrate and disappear, while he, his name and his ideas are going to stay for ages to come.
Xenosophia 2 years ago
I can understand what he is saying at least as well as he can. The problem is that beneath the dressing of jargonese his points are no more than trite clichés and contemporary platitudes. I am a philosophy student (unlike Bhabha) and have to deal with Kant and Hegel. They're difficult to read because the difficulty of their thought. Bhahba's thought is easy. He's difficult to read because he dresses his thought up in meaningless jargon in order to seem cleverer than he is.
Alessandro1985 2 years ago 5
I agree."On Commitment to Theory" has just wasted 3 hours of my life. Now I get to listen to a 3 hour lecture on the greasy little pill.
ashburnhouse 2 years ago
@Alessandro1985 I agree. I actually laughed at when he started his presentation by saying that his extract from Foucault creates a feeling of ambivalence in him - as that's pretty much the only thing he has to say about anything.
kruger97 1 year ago
Homi Bhabha is symptomatic of the third-rate, jargon-ridden pseudo-philosophy being sold off in the comparative-literature departments. This is junk-food for the mind, there's a reason it's not read in the actual philosophy departments (just by English profs pretending to be philosophers). Your argument that he'll be remembered by posterity is vacuous. Britney Spears will also have a posthumous reception.
Alessandro1985 2 years ago 4
I'm afraid the reason you see Bhabha in the terms you have described is simply that your traditional training in philosophy and your strong investment in it being important and true forces your mind to see and interpret the world in a strictly polarized fashion, which is in fact precisely what Bhabha is fighting against. So no wonder to you he deserves all the adjectives you have listed. Philosophy is indeed a very dangerous tradition.
Xenosophia 2 years ago 2
A brilliant con man. Quite possibly the greatest intellectual scam artist in the academy today. Behind that wall of pretentious nonsense, I can hear the laughter of a stunningly intelligent joker as he cashes his pay cheque at the bank.
jacksonhansonjackson 2 years ago 8
@jacksonhansonjackson Here, here!
kruger97 1 year ago
The strange thing is how anybody in the audience manages to keep themselves from laughing. All the American students are, no doubt, sitting there, with an attentive expression on their faces, as if they were listening to an intelligent speech. In reality, Bhabha strings together random combinations of pseudo-academic jargo and lingo, maybe occasionally rising to make a meaningful but unfortunately vacuous point.
Alessandro1985 2 years ago 7
He sounds like a comedian doing an impression of a comedian doing an impression of an incomprehensible idiot. His fake English accent is hilarious. His brain has turned into post-modernist goo. And all that's left is an indian with an edwardian accent.
lottiesocks 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
lottiesocks 2 years ago 2
Homi Bhabha talks meaningless gibberish, and people buy it. He's like the Bernie Madoff of the academic world, entirely fraudulent.
scotty123123 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
lols...that's a tad bit harsh... his ramblings on bout transitional spaces is interesting...
eC987 2 years ago
GristleTit: Are you always this angry or were you born just plainly stupid?
pseudonym1964 2 years ago
Hubristic bilge pump of the indecipherable.
Pays good though.
jy768 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Splitting ain't easy,
It's trouble:
An unfeasibly singular double!
You can try, hurt and achin'
To get bifurcation
While Bhabha
Just rubs all his stubble.
joetyer 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Splitting ain't easy,
It's trouble.
It's an unfeasibly singular double.
You can try, hurt, and achin'
To get bifurcation
While Bhabha
Just rubs all his stubble.
joetyer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thank you, Homi Bhabha! What a brilliant mind!
sisilisko76 2 years ago
We can finally conclude that there is no "there", there.
marzish 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@higher7000: u don't understand what he's saying...do u?
calmball 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thank you. great channel.
inkonwater 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thanks
dialore 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thank you very much
but sorry to comment on "higher7000" who said that was nonsense. sorry to "it" that he/she didn't understand him. at least u should thank him b/c of his wanderful speech.
mounir126 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nonsense from start to finish.
higher7000 3 years ago 13
This comment has received too many negative votes show
very educating and useful
abiehakhawaja 3 years ago
thanks!
bloch08 4 years ago