If you have to make comparisons to someone as low as Saddam you really know you're morally defunct.
WTF is this BS? So we brought freedom and democracy to Iraq, and replaced the hanging that Saddam would have dished out for this guy with a few broken ribs and arms. Hypocritical bastards.
Let this be an indication of how grateful Iraqis are for fucking their country up!
bush did it for the oil and nothing more. bush family made saddom, bin laden and hitler. bush dont get a fck about american people so what make you think he cares about iraq. i will put my money on the oil and the money bush can make off it. by the way it was bush sr and that loser reagan who gave wmd to iraq and it was the same to retard anti american republicans who trained bin laden.
We did elect Bush twice. Because we don't like switching directions in the middle of a war. We have deep fears of another vietnam and bringing home 500 soldiers a week in bags. If there was another viable candidate, Bush would have been gone. But, that's what happens when there is a two party system and each are wildly out of contact with people they supposed represent.
BTW, many westerners don't know that throwing shoes is a huge insult in the middle east.
Too bad he missed. The iraqis are pretty pissed at Bush to throw shoes at him.
But on the other hand, maybe they would all like Saddam and his sons back. Give the Iraqis 5 years of self rule, they will find their new Saddam and be back where they were.
I agree with you untill certain point.We all make bad choices sometimes, the iraqis are no different.Didn't the americans choose Bush(twice)?I'm portuguese, and we have chosen a government as bad as those... Deeply they're all the same, once they get the power, they forget about the social point! :|
Was Iraq in such a sorry state under Saddam you ignorant muppet? NO!
And that isnt to big Saddam up or suggest it was great under Saddam, but rather its to show just how FUCKED UP iraq is now!
The country's infrastructure is destroyed, poverty, disease, a suicide bomber on every street corner and sectarian strife which means your own neighbour wants you dead.
Iraq is dead, congratulations you bastards. It will never recover from its current state in our lifetimes.
You would prefer the ruling of a maniacal dictator over a transition into democracy in this case? Change in a country isn't exactly easy. It takes resources, manpower, and dedication, all of which are shortages in Iraq. Bush has less than a month left in office. I hope for Obama's sake, he knows what he's getting himself into. As I said, change is not easy, but that is Obama's catchphrase, so I hope he's ready for the challenge. (Though his plan is to abandon and flee.)
Here's the thing..it's not up to me to decide whats best for Iraq, neither is it for yourselves as World Police to decide. Its the iraqis country so its their choice. Bear that in mind next time your country goes out on one of these democracy ventures...if the people want change, they will change from within. Please for the love of God, you have shown the world your complete ineptitude at nation building, so dont you even dare think about destroying another nation!
"If they want change, they'll change from within"....? i guess try telling that to the Germans under Hitler's rule... States don't always have the means to achieve what they want on their own.
Then thats the way its meant to be. If the people really want liberating, they WILL liberate themselves...we've seen countless countries gain their independence through this way. No need for other fucking countries to get involved. Hitler doesnt compare...he had declared war on other countries so they had to confront him. Saddam at present was attacking no-one? Go ahead and claim he went to war with neighbours and I'll remind you that America backed him against Iran...
You know truth has nothing to do with opinion actually but I do agree with you, and I actually agree with what youve been saying about Iraq. (I never said ANYTHING about Iraq so I dont know why you tried calling me out on that) but what I DONT agree with you on is how you say if a country comes in and uses its force to overthrow another country and that country cant defend itself, then its meant to be. But then you turn around and criticize the U.S. for its invasion on Iraq.
Now I personally agree that we shouldnt have been there in there first place; but your logic is skewed and you contradict yourself you sound like somebody that just wants to bitch about something.
I was just saying this to my daughter talking about the President Bush shoe-throwing incident... "I mean honestly... who throws a shoe?" LMAO But all kidding aside... that reporter is my new freakin' hero. If I had the money to post his bail and the ability to argue his case pro bono I would do it in a heartbeat.
What would you say if, in the future, an Iraqi reporter chucked a shoe at Obama?
Does the story get a different spin when "the shoe goes on the other foot?"
Don't bother replying... I already know your responses...
My point is: There are right and wrong ways to display freedom of speech in a democracy, and physical abuse (including shoe-throwing) is not acceptable-- no matter how much one dislikes an elected leader!
UM WHEN BUSH TOOK DOWN THE WTC AND HIS GRANDFATHER PUT HITLER INTO POWER AND THE FMAILY GAVE WMD TO SADDOM HOW DOES THAT EFFECT OBAMA? by the way there all facts just look up prescott bush hitler connection and the bush family on line. these people as in the anti amwerican bush family killed americans for about 80 yrs now for money and power as in the nafta program or north american union act.
this is a funny video of hitler i mean saddom i mean prescott bush i mean bin laden no w8 i mean gorge bush. sorry there all so a like and there all best friends my bad. i get them all confused with them all having the same game plain trying to make a 1 world goverment and all. nafta
Yay, I get the first comment. I bet myself $10 dollars that some stupid yank would post an Austin Powers reference to this. Now I'm $10 dollars richer. Thankyou. Get a life.
41 out of 41 anti american republicans voted against helping this country. no republican has ever did a thing to help america.
MvPOFBHD 3 years ago
Wow... the Secret Service drop the 'shoe' on that one!
ddj8 3 years ago
I NEED SOMEONE TO TALK TO
wanting new friends BR
05052012 3 years ago
Austin Power = Bush Shose
alsejraj 3 years ago
And this stuff wouldn't have even flew when Saddam was still in power (no pun intended).
yevonator88 3 years ago
If you have to make comparisons to someone as low as Saddam you really know you're morally defunct.
WTF is this BS? So we brought freedom and democracy to Iraq, and replaced the hanging that Saddam would have dished out for this guy with a few broken ribs and arms. Hypocritical bastards.
Let this be an indication of how grateful Iraqis are for fucking their country up!
WonkyDoodle 3 years ago
bush did it for the oil and nothing more. bush family made saddom, bin laden and hitler. bush dont get a fck about american people so what make you think he cares about iraq. i will put my money on the oil and the money bush can make off it. by the way it was bush sr and that loser reagan who gave wmd to iraq and it was the same to retard anti american republicans who trained bin laden.
MvPOFBHD 3 years ago
I'm sorry that you have Silva.
We did elect Bush twice. Because we don't like switching directions in the middle of a war. We have deep fears of another vietnam and bringing home 500 soldiers a week in bags. If there was another viable candidate, Bush would have been gone. But, that's what happens when there is a two party system and each are wildly out of contact with people they supposed represent.
BTW, many westerners don't know that throwing shoes is a huge insult in the middle east.
xferall 3 years ago
Too bad he missed. The iraqis are pretty pissed at Bush to throw shoes at him.
But on the other hand, maybe they would all like Saddam and his sons back. Give the Iraqis 5 years of self rule, they will find their new Saddam and be back where they were.
xferall 3 years ago
I agree with you untill certain point.We all make bad choices sometimes, the iraqis are no different.Didn't the americans choose Bush(twice)?I'm portuguese, and we have chosen a government as bad as those... Deeply they're all the same, once they get the power, they forget about the social point! :|
misswilliamps 3 years ago
Was Iraq in such a sorry state under Saddam you ignorant muppet? NO!
And that isnt to big Saddam up or suggest it was great under Saddam, but rather its to show just how FUCKED UP iraq is now!
The country's infrastructure is destroyed, poverty, disease, a suicide bomber on every street corner and sectarian strife which means your own neighbour wants you dead.
Iraq is dead, congratulations you bastards. It will never recover from its current state in our lifetimes.
WonkyDoodle 3 years ago 2
You would prefer the ruling of a maniacal dictator over a transition into democracy in this case? Change in a country isn't exactly easy. It takes resources, manpower, and dedication, all of which are shortages in Iraq. Bush has less than a month left in office. I hope for Obama's sake, he knows what he's getting himself into. As I said, change is not easy, but that is Obama's catchphrase, so I hope he's ready for the challenge. (Though his plan is to abandon and flee.)
yevonator88 3 years ago
Here's the thing..it's not up to me to decide whats best for Iraq, neither is it for yourselves as World Police to decide. Its the iraqis country so its their choice. Bear that in mind next time your country goes out on one of these democracy ventures...if the people want change, they will change from within. Please for the love of God, you have shown the world your complete ineptitude at nation building, so dont you even dare think about destroying another nation!
WonkyDoodle 3 years ago 4
"If they want change, they'll change from within"....? i guess try telling that to the Germans under Hitler's rule... States don't always have the means to achieve what they want on their own.
nc4t7 2 years ago
Then thats the way its meant to be. If the people really want liberating, they WILL liberate themselves...we've seen countless countries gain their independence through this way. No need for other fucking countries to get involved. Hitler doesnt compare...he had declared war on other countries so they had to confront him. Saddam at present was attacking no-one? Go ahead and claim he went to war with neighbours and I'll remind you that America backed him against Iran...
WonkyDoodle 2 years ago
well... im just glad that the majority of the world does not follow your... "logic"
nc4t7 2 years ago
Truth is not measured by mass opinion.
You know you haven't got a leg to stand on when it comes to Iraq.
WonkyDoodle 2 years ago
You know truth has nothing to do with opinion actually but I do agree with you, and I actually agree with what youve been saying about Iraq. (I never said ANYTHING about Iraq so I dont know why you tried calling me out on that) but what I DONT agree with you on is how you say if a country comes in and uses its force to overthrow another country and that country cant defend itself, then its meant to be. But then you turn around and criticize the U.S. for its invasion on Iraq.
nc4t7 2 years ago
Read the discussion, its about Iraq.
I dont get what "logic" you disagree with?
WonkyDoodle 2 years ago
Now I personally agree that we shouldnt have been there in there first place; but your logic is skewed and you contradict yourself you sound like somebody that just wants to bitch about something.
nc4t7 2 years ago
OUR COUNTRY IS NOT A FUCKING DEMOCRACY
B12adSC 3 years ago
I was just saying this to my daughter talking about the President Bush shoe-throwing incident... "I mean honestly... who throws a shoe?" LMAO But all kidding aside... that reporter is my new freakin' hero. If I had the money to post his bail and the ability to argue his case pro bono I would do it in a heartbeat.
jrlincoln75 3 years ago
yup i knew this joke wass going come up.
LMAO
Tailsown 3 years ago
Lmfao
FierySora1 3 years ago
What would you say if, in the future, an Iraqi reporter chucked a shoe at Obama?
Does the story get a different spin when "the shoe goes on the other foot?"
Don't bother replying... I already know your responses...
My point is: There are right and wrong ways to display freedom of speech in a democracy, and physical abuse (including shoe-throwing) is not acceptable-- no matter how much one dislikes an elected leader!
donnie55555 3 years ago
UM WHEN BUSH TOOK DOWN THE WTC AND HIS GRANDFATHER PUT HITLER INTO POWER AND THE FMAILY GAVE WMD TO SADDOM HOW DOES THAT EFFECT OBAMA? by the way there all facts just look up prescott bush hitler connection and the bush family on line. these people as in the anti amwerican bush family killed americans for about 80 yrs now for money and power as in the nafta program or north american union act.
MvPOFBHD 3 years ago
this is a funny video of hitler i mean saddom i mean prescott bush i mean bin laden no w8 i mean gorge bush. sorry there all so a like and there all best friends my bad. i get them all confused with them all having the same game plain trying to make a 1 world goverment and all. nafta
MvPOFBHD 3 years ago
lol!
Xno0bsPawn3rs 3 years ago
Sorry. I take it back, I didn't mean to be rude.
I'm Australian actually. G'day
berlinjazz 3 years ago
And that's how an internet meme is born
primepm 3 years ago
Berlin jazz - at least we stupid yanks have dentists - so meow.
LAchickee 3 years ago
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
LAchickee 3 years ago
how about a matrix version?
shrekpd54 3 years ago
Yay, I get the first comment. I bet myself $10 dollars that some stupid yank would post an Austin Powers reference to this. Now I'm $10 dollars richer. Thankyou. Get a life.
berlinjazz 3 years ago
Hey Dieter, your story has become tiresome. I vould not vahnt to touch your monkey...
00JosefK 3 years ago