C'mon dodododa, flat strokes have their advantages - balls land deeper in the opponents court, though there is less margin of error in net clearance. No need to be a topspin fanboi.
Its crazy how he can play so well with that style. Different generation I guess. He still gets some pop from that forehand when he steps backwards as he follows through.
The reason why he plays so well is because his strokes have no "hitches." Pretty much straight back, straight thru, by the book. He wasn't the greatest player in the world, but due to the economy of his strokes, he seldom had "off days" so in his prime, he usually made it to the semis or finals.
I tried the Precision Mono back in 1996 when I first joined the local tennis club. Well I was just learning back then so I cant tell you how it was, haha.
Looks kinda unorthodox and not the best looking strokes. Venus & Serena have a much more natural looking ability. Im not dying that he was amazing tho in his day! and very sucessful
@sas2206 Why would you compare ATP and WTA players? Especially a male player from nearly 30 years ago? Connors' strokes are extremely clean and very precise. He hits the ball flat because that is how you hit the ball back then with the rackets, not to mention he is a fast court player. If you hit like that for all of your professional career, you aren't going to change even if technology does. Connors by far has top 10 groundstrokes of all time. Probably only behind Federer/Agassi/Lendl
@THEKINKS08 I'm talking about fast court players though. Nadal/Borg certainly have fantastic groundstrokes, but they are more well known for their defense. Courier could be in the list, but he was still more a slow court player as well.
If you took Connors in his prime and through him out on tour against the players of today, he would get killed!!f The game has changed that much! Same goes for all those former greats, including Laver.
@Gman6755 Most players in the past would, but not connors. He held with Agassi and Agassi scared a bunch of these players on tour right now. Laver may have had problems with the women's tour, but Connors would still be a contender on the men's tour.
T2000 secret. stretch the head oval before stringing. all the pics u see of Jimmy, the head is oval. all the other pix, eg, Billie Jean, its round. That's when it has a totally unpredictable sweetspot performance. Guy in Newport bch taught me that in 77 and i LOVED the 2000. cheers. kc
@diredesire It's actually not that old school - it came out in 1994. I just think Connors had them design it that way for him. I personally wish more racquet companies had the guts that Prince had to come out with what is a very traditional design in the 90's era of racquets.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
there is something really wrong with his backhand... He is relying mainly on his closer hand which is generaly a big mistake on two handed backhand...
@daraemkar Actually Agassi's backhand is more violent and is hit with topspin. Connors hits with underspin on his backhand. I wish someone these days would hit like connors. It would be amazing.
"There is something really wrong with his backhand..." is one of the more foolish things I've heard today. Jimbo won five US Open titles with that beastly backhand.
Jimmy could do fine against them. He could compete and would adapt to the present technology of rackets. He competed great with Andre Agassi. With respect to Andre, he got close to beating Andre in their match in 1989.
In his Prime and even later, he could compete. He has one thing that some players lack, that fighting spirit and determination that very few have. He'd be as fast if not faster than some. But if you don't agree, than that's your opinion. I think he would do very good.
No one is going to win in this argument. The current generation thinks their athletes are the best and so much better than the other, while people who support Jimmy Connors and their generation are trying to say how he could compete against the present generation.
Bottom line, people adapt to the new technologies. And Jimmy could be able to adapt. It's just sad that people are so disrespectful of Jimmy Connors just because he played with different racket.
And Jimmy could dominate now. Jimmy has something that is important for an athlete, the "fighting" mentality which is so important to sports. His competitivenss has not been matched. So I honestly believe Jimmy Connors could compete and dominate whenever he played. Jimmy in fact did adapt from the Wood and aluminum rackets to when he first played, to the graphite and increased power rackets later. So Jimmy proved he could adapt. Respect to Jimmy Connors. He would do fine today.
Haha!You can hear Nadal shouting while hitting his shots in the background!By the way,this is a very nice video because it shows how an old legend can compete with a good player of nowadays even without using the best racquet and the most advanced technologies.
You call this competing? Youre kidding right? Hes hitting shots into the net every now and then and Roddick is pretty much hitting right at him every shot. Its good that he can still hit so well for his ae though
Be cool, be respectful. Jimmy Connors would do fine if he competed now. But if you disagree, you're entitled to your opinion. To be honest, he has the biggest fighting spirit I've ever seen in a Tennis Player. So with this mentality, he could compete and do good. Peace. :)
Im not sure if he would do well since im not familiar with his game, but im saying NOW. The other guy was saying how Connors is "competing" with Roddick in this video when he is barely keeping up.
I actually went back and read my comment, and im disappointed. Youre a hypocrite. Having a bad hip doesnt mean that you can play badly and still be considered to play well. It means you have a bad hip and cant play well. I see no relevance to him having a hip reconstruction and the fact that he is not "competing" with Roddick in this video
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wow haha... he was a fantastic player but seeing this tape shows me how absolutely horrible his strokes were... its a wonder how he played so amazingly with a game like that... i guess if you practice something over and over you can do it consistently.
In 1974, Jimmy was banned by the ATP to play in the French Open. Because he played world team tennis. He won the three other majors that year. Perhaps he would have won the Grand Slam? Was not given the chance though.
I think Connors is probably the most underated player of all time. Can't ignore the fact that he won 109 singles titles! That will never be duplicated. His career winning % is over 82%. I think you can't look at "only" grand slams to decide the best players of all time. Why bother even playing any other tournaments then? Jimmy never took time off to better prepare for majors like many do. He considered every tournament important. I don't like a lot of his antics, but have to give credit
nadal is better than nastase, lendl and connors in their times. The difference is that nadal has the greatest tennis player of all time competing with him and many other good players that didnt have connors and the others
he really slices the backhand and makes that forehand look really hard to do. man that racket also looks like a badmitton racket or something. great for his era, but would get owned by todays standards...
I wonder what shampoo he uses? His hair is still full and still flinging around like it's still so soft like in his younger days. haha. But he's GREEAT!
His two handed backhand looks like its going from high to low, as if slicing it. Or maybe he is scooping it? I'd love to see a slow motion of that, its really different looking
he actually hits it with side spin, so it stays very low and goes away from the opponent.He hit's it flat if it's higher, but he seldom uses topspin and when it does it's very, very little
Wow, what an education to ready some of the comments on this forum about Jimmy's form. By the way the racket is a Prince Mono which is only the second racket Jimmy has played with for any length of time since the T2000 came out in about 1970. Played with a Mono and a T2000 back in the 70s. You young bucks' entire ignorance of tennis and how the rackets amazes me. I'm 47 and if somebody handed both of us a T2000 today, I would eat your lunch and steal your girlfriend in that time.
I have seen some footage of connors on youtube and I got say that in his day from what I saw, he is just like nadal on court, fighting for every point,competive to the extreme,going ballistic and celebrating when he won a difficult point..it was quite entertaining actually to see..check it out
Jimmy's strokes were classic at the time. During the time that he grew up you were taught to hit a forehand with an eastern grip. The backhand of jimmy's is genius one of the best of all-time.
Actually I can understand why us younger players would think they look weird, almost everyone now uses the semi-western and there is heavy topspin including the finish that breaks shoulder-side....connors does not have an exaggerated follow through plus that straight take back classic as it is, would make any of us younger players who did not get much of tennis from that era, think it weird, which is not necessarily so because he has 8 grand slams...impressive by any standard:)
Yep, Nadal was on an adjacent court practicing. I took two Nadal videos that day at @ 3:20 PM. Next was a Roddick video at 4:05 PM, and finally this one(after Roddick was through practicing) at 4:30 PM. Nadal's grunt is distinctive.
I could recognize Jimmy Connors from 1000 meters away. He had very distinct mannerisms. Sure his technique looks a bit odd, but you can't argue with success. Connors won a record 109 singles titles on the pro tour. He won the 1982 Wimbledon final against McEnroe with zero aces. Nobody will do that again.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
A calculating thug on the court, a mercenary and asshole off it, Jimmy Connors wakes up one morning to discover that his reputation as an all-time great is secure but nobody actually likes him. Is forced to take up coaching to give his life some meaning in his lonely, declining years.
You don't see pros hitting tennis balls as flat as he does anymore. He is a legend. He gets the maximum out of the minimum. We need more players like Jimmy.
There is little doubt that you had to be more precise with those old t 2000's and wooden rackets. I just don't understand why they changed it: Baseball still uses wood not aluminum. Back then you had to play the point not just power the ball.
Jimmy never won a free point, because his serve was adequate at best. He earned everything with his two-fisted backhand, his relentless pressure...deep to the corners. A classic player from tennis' golden era
Connors won all of his majors with the tiny Wilson T2000. My neighbor's dad was an A level player in the 70's and 80's and had one too and it was smaller than a woodie. Agassi beat Guy Forget that day too. It was the Volvo Classic tournament in '84 or '85 Stefan Edberg was there too. Anyways, they may hit harder now though not that much faster considering the equipment. Mac would casually hit on the rise and his ball would EXPLODE off his racket.
This dude isw one of the greatest. I saw him play and practice at UCLA when he was in his prime. Dayum, they don't make them like that anymore. Amazing player
It's really interesting to hear the comments on the way Connors hits the ball. No doubt, in this era his technique is bound to be somewhat controversial, and inspire debate. I don't want to take sides, but I WILL say that the ball was coming off his racquet with pretty good pace. Not quite as hard as the current pros I taped, but pretty decent nonetheless. Keep in mind that in the last couple years Connors had hip-replacement surgery. Keep the comments coming!
For those who say awful technique... at least do yourself a favor and cover your ignorance admitting that what you saw there is one of the most beautiful backhands ever. And what about McEnroe´s technique? Connors game looks like heaven compared to McEnroe´s.
I thought his strokes were crazy but then I saw Connors and he realized he used the same strokes but, obviously!!!, on a whole nother level. I can only imagine how hard his game must be to play against.
I actually have a friend on my school's tennis team who hits almost exactly like Connors, especially the forehand. He is annoying to play because all the little tricks people have dont work on him. Spin, he makes dissapear. Blast the ball at him...his stroke is so simple and quick that unless its a clear winner he nails it back deep and hard with no effort.
It's a shame nobody has the "eyes" to see the genius of his game... short backswing, out in front, greatest return of serve, hit on the rise... these qualities extended his career. All these great athletes of today will not play anywhere near their current level in their early thirties. Yeah, they swing harder, but it tears their bodies up after time. Compare Connors today vs Vilas today... Vilas would get his ass kicked. (Vilas also was my hero) Props to Connors...
And yet with that "awful technique" he won more titles than any player ever. He could have won even more if he hadn´t boycotted certain tournaments for years. So maybe it´s "awful", but highly succesful, or am I wrong?
Obviously, he has the most incredible moving body in tennis history, his wrist did'nt have the same ability as the modern top spiners, but his backhand is still the greatest in tennis history, even Laver agrees...
@sas2206: I beg to differ and bet many others would as well.
xquisitaz 2 months ago
C'mon dodododa, flat strokes have their advantages - balls land deeper in the opponents court, though there is less margin of error in net clearance. No need to be a topspin fanboi.
ogedei 8 months ago
C'mon Jimmy, they invented top spin years ago.
dodododa 11 months ago
Does anyone know what type of racquet he is using?
RecipeDan 1 year ago
@RecipeDan It's a Prince Precision Mono...I actually have a brand new one. It was designed particularly with Connors in mind.
Tennisclassics 8 months ago
JC looks pretty damn good out there!!!!!!
ripperduck 1 year ago
@ripperduck Will never forget that day. He DID look good out there. Not bad for someone his age with a artificial hip. Thanks for commenting.
worldted 1 year ago
Its crazy how he can play so well with that style. Different generation I guess. He still gets some pop from that forehand when he steps backwards as he follows through.
MrSuperguy1000 1 year ago
The reason why he plays so well is because his strokes have no "hitches." Pretty much straight back, straight thru, by the book. He wasn't the greatest player in the world, but due to the economy of his strokes, he seldom had "off days" so in his prime, he usually made it to the semis or finals.
theriokid 1 year ago
He's still moving those feet! Great player!
gyrate4 1 year ago
I hear Nadal somewhere...
AzN2K6 1 year ago
@AzN2K6 Yes, Nadal was on an adjacent court practicing. The Nadal video I have was that practice session.
worldted 1 year ago
Connors still has it after all these years. Awesome player.
gretscher 1 year ago
I tried the Precision Mono back in 1996 when I first joined the local tennis club. Well I was just learning back then so I cant tell you how it was, haha.
rmrooster01 1 year ago
Looks kinda unorthodox and not the best looking strokes. Venus & Serena have a much more natural looking ability. Im not dying that he was amazing tho in his day! and very sucessful
sas2206 1 year ago
@sas2206 Why would you compare ATP and WTA players? Especially a male player from nearly 30 years ago? Connors' strokes are extremely clean and very precise. He hits the ball flat because that is how you hit the ball back then with the rackets, not to mention he is a fast court player. If you hit like that for all of your professional career, you aren't going to change even if technology does. Connors by far has top 10 groundstrokes of all time. Probably only behind Federer/Agassi/Lendl
AllGenreMusic 1 year ago
@AllGenreMusic
right, probably behind Borg, Nadal and Jim Courier too
THEKINKS08 1 year ago
@THEKINKS08 I'm talking about fast court players though. Nadal/Borg certainly have fantastic groundstrokes, but they are more well known for their defense. Courier could be in the list, but he was still more a slow court player as well.
AllGenreMusic 1 year ago
@AllGenreMusic
That's true, talking about fast surfaces Jimmy was for sure in the all-time's top five . Couldn't agree more
THEKINKS08 1 year ago
If you took Connors in his prime and through him out on tour against the players of today, he would get killed!!f The game has changed that much! Same goes for all those former greats, including Laver.
Gman6755 2 years ago
@Gman6755 Most players in the past would, but not connors. He held with Agassi and Agassi scared a bunch of these players on tour right now. Laver may have had problems with the women's tour, but Connors would still be a contender on the men's tour.
dura1mater 1 year ago
if jimmy had some 25 year old legs, he would still be able to beat a lot of players on the atp tour
bevanne12 2 years ago
he is nearly 60yrs old, with a steel hip and still hitting a very fine backhand
his style of play/shot making required very good eyes and timing...most today could not play his style...
the backhand is a thing of beauty...he is spot on w/it...
jlr0926 2 years ago 3
his strokes are extremely ugly
lollygoddard123 2 years ago
Queenofcourt, your ignorance is delicious.
Nigelxman 2 years ago
T2000 secret. stretch the head oval before stringing. all the pics u see of Jimmy, the head is oval. all the other pix, eg, Billie Jean, its round. That's when it has a totally unpredictable sweetspot performance. Guy in Newport bch taught me that in 77 and i LOVED the 2000. cheers. kc
makenakai 2 years ago
What the heck kind of racquet is he using? Anyone know?
piedrada 2 years ago
@piedrada: Prince Precision Mono, it's an old school racquet with no throat.
diredesire 2 years ago
Thanks ... leave it up to Jinmmy to always use something unorthodox ... how he ever made the T2000 work is beyond me??
piedrada 2 years ago
@diredesire It's actually not that old school - it came out in 1994. I just think Connors had them design it that way for him. I personally wish more racquet companies had the guts that Prince had to come out with what is a very traditional design in the 90's era of racquets.
Tennisclassics 8 months ago
It's a badminton racket.
isselman2000 2 years ago
@piedrada Prince Precision Mono - a racquet that he helped design. You can find them on EBAY
Tennisclassics 8 months ago
@piedrada It's a Prince Precision Mono - a racquet that he helped design
Tennisclassics 8 months ago
great
KIKIESSAM 2 years ago
I wish I had his hair.....lol
Canamana42 2 years ago
Jimbo's form and footwork still look great. One of the best ever and my personal fave.
TheMagedMan 2 years ago
sounds like roddick at the other end
logant44 2 years ago
It was actually Andy Roddick's brother.
worldted 2 years ago
I tried that racqut - horrible to play with though
kinkabala 2 years ago
wow consider he is old!
supertrex2 2 years ago
Comment removed
bafdisney 2 years ago
that racket looks like a badminton one lol... look closely at the throat.. lol
dave5566 2 years ago
that's a Prince Mono, i guess, 15 years old racquet
THEKINKS08 2 years ago
He has somme strange shots... son revers est vraiment bizarre ...
cestmoi974 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
there is something really wrong with his backhand... He is relying mainly on his closer hand which is generaly a big mistake on two handed backhand...
mashafun 2 years ago
Really? Agassi hits like that too. Maybe you should tell him he has a flawed backhand.
daraemkar 2 years ago 5
@daraemkar Actually Agassi's backhand is more violent and is hit with topspin. Connors hits with underspin on his backhand. I wish someone these days would hit like connors. It would be amazing.
dura1mater 1 year ago
What is the closer hand in this case?
Pamqnx 2 years ago
"There is something really wrong with his backhand..." is one of the more foolish things I've heard today. Jimbo won five US Open titles with that beastly backhand.
tyruk 2 years ago
Agreed. He has one of the best backhands of all time. It'd work great even in this era.
worldted 2 years ago
The flattest ground strokes of the modern era.
elguapostino 3 years ago
Jimmy could do fine against them. He could compete and would adapt to the present technology of rackets. He competed great with Andre Agassi. With respect to Andre, he got close to beating Andre in their match in 1989.
Be cool. Why so disrespectful?
Peace.
jkygogo 3 years ago
noooo i dont thnk so. he might still have the tecnique and everythn but he will be 2 slow
kusta345 3 years ago
In his Prime and even later, he could compete. He has one thing that some players lack, that fighting spirit and determination that very few have. He'd be as fast if not faster than some. But if you don't agree, than that's your opinion. I think he would do very good.
Peace.
jkygogo 3 years ago
He's still using the old school forehand... but he sure hasn't lost any of his hitting skills. Perfect technique...
FinalFan0 3 years ago
perfect timing! if u use that technique with wrong timing you are gone!
supertrex2 2 years ago
I can vouche for that personally as I recenly got eliminated from a tournament for having terrible timing...
FinalFan0 2 years ago 2
No one is going to win in this argument. The current generation thinks their athletes are the best and so much better than the other, while people who support Jimmy Connors and their generation are trying to say how he could compete against the present generation.
Bottom line, people adapt to the new technologies. And Jimmy could be able to adapt. It's just sad that people are so disrespectful of Jimmy Connors just because he played with different racket.
He could compete.
jkygogo 3 years ago
And Jimmy could dominate now. Jimmy has something that is important for an athlete, the "fighting" mentality which is so important to sports. His competitivenss has not been matched. So I honestly believe Jimmy Connors could compete and dominate whenever he played. Jimmy in fact did adapt from the Wood and aluminum rackets to when he first played, to the graphite and increased power rackets later. So Jimmy proved he could adapt. Respect to Jimmy Connors. He would do fine today.
jkygogo 3 years ago
he had more heart than anyone ive ever seen play, monica seles is a close second..
chrisrei10 2 years ago
i don't know what you just said. english.
punjabitype 3 years ago
Good thing there's no such thing as the grammar police or your ass would be in jail.
It's "would have" not "would of" you illiterate hill billy.
punjabitype 3 years ago
1:08 "only idiots hit it harder" jajaja que grande
nachoambort 3 years ago
Yeah! I remember when he said that. It was pretty funny. Got a good laugh from those watching.
worldted 3 years ago
Haha!You can hear Nadal shouting while hitting his shots in the background!By the way,this is a very nice video because it shows how an old legend can compete with a good player of nowadays even without using the best racquet and the most advanced technologies.
jack89ts 3 years ago
You call this competing? Youre kidding right? Hes hitting shots into the net every now and then and Roddick is pretty much hitting right at him every shot. Its good that he can still hit so well for his ae though
acies92 3 years ago
Be cool, be respectful. Jimmy Connors would do fine if he competed now. But if you disagree, you're entitled to your opinion. To be honest, he has the biggest fighting spirit I've ever seen in a Tennis Player. So with this mentality, he could compete and do good. Peace. :)
jkygogo 3 years ago
Im not sure if he would do well since im not familiar with his game, but im saying NOW. The other guy was saying how Connors is "competing" with Roddick in this video when he is barely keeping up.
acies92 3 years ago
He has had reconstructed hip surgery you idiot, lets see how you would move after that
conndogg79 2 years ago
I actually went back and read my comment, and im disappointed. Youre a hypocrite. Having a bad hip doesnt mean that you can play badly and still be considered to play well. It means you have a bad hip and cant play well. I see no relevance to him having a hip reconstruction and the fact that he is not "competing" with Roddick in this video
acies92 2 years ago
You said he was having the ball hit right to him, thats because he recently had a hip replacement.
conndogg79 2 years ago
Do you know what the meaning of the word hypocrite even means?
conndogg79 2 years ago
Shut the fuck up. You're making no sense.
guthixboy18 2 years ago
queenofcourt : you're an absolute idiot. You'd better learn from tato4527 although he's twice younger than you !!
endicott3 3 years ago
that style es so old, that is true, but, he is one of the most incredibles and important tennis player ever...
tato4527 3 years ago
haha that style is so old and bad!
KevinKrack 3 years ago
Well..old, yes, bad, no.
worldted 3 years ago
damn connor still got a pretty nice backhand, but an ugly forehand xD
Prickle 3 years ago
his strokes are so funny and flat..
anywho, they were effective
marokokisetter 3 years ago
For everyone who is wondering what kind of racquet that Jimmy's using, he is using the Prince Precision Mono. it is no longer in production
Tennisclassics 3 years ago
Jimmy Connors could probably beat Roddick now.
quest8899 3 years ago 2
I'm not so sure I agree with that. Roddick is playing pretty well these days. LOL
worldted 3 years ago
haha u can hear rafa in the background starting at 2 min onward
leelord337 3 years ago
the rotation on his forehand side with his shoulder matched to his his hip is wonderful. a clean transfer of energy into the ball.
tennismike22 3 years ago 2
what the fuck type of racquet is he using????????? its the weirdest ever
vanastensucks 3 years ago
its the prince precision mono. its like a graphite version of a wood racquet. if that makes sense.
drifterbum 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow haha... he was a fantastic player but seeing this tape shows me how absolutely horrible his strokes were... its a wonder how he played so amazingly with a game like that... i guess if you practice something over and over you can do it consistently.
azIRHSkid1 3 years ago
the hell racquet is that... looks like a wood racket, but not...
ilsur 3 years ago
great tennis player, but the ugliest strokes in tennis history:)
dominikkeul 3 years ago
I sort of agree about his forehand and serve, but his backhand WAS a good-looking shot.
worldted 3 years ago
In 1974, Jimmy was banned by the ATP to play in the French Open. Because he played world team tennis. He won the three other majors that year. Perhaps he would have won the Grand Slam? Was not given the chance though.
ThailandKyle 3 years ago
I think Connors is probably the most underated player of all time. Can't ignore the fact that he won 109 singles titles! That will never be duplicated. His career winning % is over 82%. I think you can't look at "only" grand slams to decide the best players of all time. Why bother even playing any other tournaments then? Jimmy never took time off to better prepare for majors like many do. He considered every tournament important. I don't like a lot of his antics, but have to give credit
ThailandKyle 3 years ago
nadal is better than nastase, lendl and connors in their times. The difference is that nadal has the greatest tennis player of all time competing with him and many other good players that didnt have connors and the others
popeye135 3 years ago
he really slices the backhand and makes that forehand look really hard to do. man that racket also looks like a badmitton racket or something. great for his era, but would get owned by todays standards...
trevorwinton 3 years ago
I wonder what shampoo he uses? His hair is still full and still flinging around like it's still so soft like in his younger days. haha. But he's GREEAT!
sukarno 3 years ago
swear i heard nadal playing in the background lol!
vonniedp 3 years ago
You did hear Nadal. He was practicing on the adjacent court.
worldted 3 years ago
hahaha yes after 2:00 you can hear rafa, good observation.
jimbooo19 3 years ago
is better him..
Sh3vCh3nk0 3 years ago
haha compare him with federer!!
KevinKrack 3 years ago
haha compare Federer with Borg!!
StinkyKnobcheese 3 years ago
Borg would totally OWN Federer.....
MegaloBellamian 3 years ago
Exactly right!
StinkyKnobcheese 3 years ago
hmmmm doesn't look like he's using his right hand for control for his backhand....i wonder how he does it
datboijj 3 years ago
when he was a touring pro, he hit his slice backhand with two hand´s , just like frenchman fabrice santoro..quite unique
reefric 3 years ago
Connors is one of a kind, he is my frickin tennis hero
MegaloBellamian 3 years ago
His two handed backhand looks like its going from high to low, as if slicing it. Or maybe he is scooping it? I'd love to see a slow motion of that, its really different looking
lobextomy 4 years ago
I wasnt talking about the follow thru of course, Im talking just before and during the hit
lobextomy 4 years ago
Interesting observation. You're right. It DOES look like he's going to slice his backhand. Never looked at Connors' backhand like that before.
worldted 4 years ago
he actually hits it with side spin, so it stays very low and goes away from the opponent.He hit's it flat if it's higher, but he seldom uses topspin and when it does it's very, very little
tommie66tx 3 years ago
Good point. I do notice a bit a sidespin on his forehand.
worldted 3 years ago
Jimmy Connors totally owns nowadays players in every single area of the sport (huh charisma alone he pwns them)
MegaloBellamian 3 years ago
Wow, what an education to ready some of the comments on this forum about Jimmy's form. By the way the racket is a Prince Mono which is only the second racket Jimmy has played with for any length of time since the T2000 came out in about 1970. Played with a Mono and a T2000 back in the 70s. You young bucks' entire ignorance of tennis and how the rackets amazes me. I'm 47 and if somebody handed both of us a T2000 today, I would eat your lunch and steal your girlfriend in that time.
paladino444 4 years ago
connors is great. he knows that you should never ever ever give up on a point.
turdferguson2 4 years ago
I have seen some footage of connors on youtube and I got say that in his day from what I saw, he is just like nadal on court, fighting for every point,competive to the extreme,going ballistic and celebrating when he won a difficult point..it was quite entertaining actually to see..check it out
reefric 4 years ago
Very well put! That pretty much sums up Jimmy Connors. He was SO much fun to watch.
worldted 4 years ago
昔 コナーズのフォームをとことんコピー
してました。in1980
tyuki0323 4 years ago
Yes, I agree with you. I was 20 years of age back in 1980, so I remember it well.
worldted 4 years ago
wat type of racquet is Jimmy Connors using?
ralphmen20060731 4 years ago
That would be the prince mono . Pretty weird looking ha?
him88002 4 years ago
Jimmy's strokes were classic at the time. During the time that he grew up you were taught to hit a forehand with an eastern grip. The backhand of jimmy's is genius one of the best of all-time.
Schrittwieser 4 years ago 3
Fed is between eastern and semi on the forehand..
buckbobo 4 years ago
i can see where you'd think they're 'weird looking', but really he has pretty classic strokes. he has very unique footwork.
turdferguson2 4 years ago
Actually I can understand why us younger players would think they look weird, almost everyone now uses the semi-western and there is heavy topspin including the finish that breaks shoulder-side....connors does not have an exaggerated follow through plus that straight take back classic as it is, would make any of us younger players who did not get much of tennis from that era, think it weird, which is not necessarily so because he has 8 grand slams...impressive by any standard:)
dmacontop 4 years ago
Connors has such weird looking strokes, especially the forehand. I guess it worked for him though.
Jimmy was awesome but had trouble against the more naturally talented players like Borg and McEnroe
stell29 4 years ago
but he made the absolute best of every ounce of his talent
musicgamer10 4 years ago
Near the end I swear you can hear Nadal grunting on some nearby court.
turdferguson2 4 years ago 6
Yep, Nadal was on an adjacent court practicing. I took two Nadal videos that day at @ 3:20 PM. Next was a Roddick video at 4:05 PM, and finally this one(after Roddick was through practicing) at 4:30 PM. Nadal's grunt is distinctive.
worldted 4 years ago
so that backhand is slice basically?
jerrymang 4 years ago 3
I could recognize Jimmy Connors from 1000 meters away. He had very distinct mannerisms. Sure his technique looks a bit odd, but you can't argue with success. Connors won a record 109 singles titles on the pro tour. He won the 1982 Wimbledon final against McEnroe with zero aces. Nobody will do that again.
Lava1964 4 years ago 9
no one got more out of their talent, or lack of talent than connors. he willed himself to win. he tried harder than anyone
robertk2007 4 years ago 3
why does he back up everytime he hits
yoshiyuan 4 years ago 3
to get the ball at the rite position to hit
texasfan58 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A calculating thug on the court, a mercenary and asshole off it, Jimmy Connors wakes up one morning to discover that his reputation as an all-time great is secure but nobody actually likes him. Is forced to take up coaching to give his life some meaning in his lonely, declining years.
PSkimmer 4 years ago
Now, that's just plain stupid.
zpeed7 4 years ago 6
Sacré Jimmy !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
pegosse29mc 4 years ago
You don't see pros hitting tennis balls as flat as he does anymore. He is a legend. He gets the maximum out of the minimum. We need more players like Jimmy.
infernalofchaos 4 years ago 4
There is little doubt that you had to be more precise with those old t 2000's and wooden rackets. I just don't understand why they changed it: Baseball still uses wood not aluminum. Back then you had to play the point not just power the ball.
localwear 4 years ago 2
1:08 "only idiots hit it harder."
ibwangin 4 years ago 2
his forehand motion looks weird.
Glarencezhao 4 years ago
You're used to seeing the modern western and semiwestern grip forehand. Connors hits using the classic eastern grip.
kabob21 4 years ago 2
Jimmy never won a free point, because his serve was adequate at best. He earned everything with his two-fisted backhand, his relentless pressure...deep to the corners. A classic player from tennis' golden era
RandyCasey 4 years ago 2
Connors won all of his majors with the tiny Wilson T2000. My neighbor's dad was an A level player in the 70's and 80's and had one too and it was smaller than a woodie. Agassi beat Guy Forget that day too. It was the Volvo Classic tournament in '84 or '85 Stefan Edberg was there too. Anyways, they may hit harder now though not that much faster considering the equipment. Mac would casually hit on the rise and his ball would EXPLODE off his racket.
billionaire35 4 years ago
This dude isw one of the greatest. I saw him play and practice at UCLA when he was in his prime. Dayum, they don't make them like that anymore. Amazing player
billionaire35 4 years ago 2
It's really interesting to hear the comments on the way Connors hits the ball. No doubt, in this era his technique is bound to be somewhat controversial, and inspire debate. I don't want to take sides, but I WILL say that the ball was coming off his racquet with pretty good pace. Not quite as hard as the current pros I taped, but pretty decent nonetheless. Keep in mind that in the last couple years Connors had hip-replacement surgery. Keep the comments coming!
worldted 4 years ago
For those who say awful technique... at least do yourself a favor and cover your ignorance admitting that what you saw there is one of the most beautiful backhands ever. And what about McEnroe´s technique? Connors game looks like heaven compared to McEnroe´s.
ralvarezguitar 4 years ago
he's still playing the same way he did back in 1980!
crapbag89 4 years ago
Great jimbo for ever, it is a pleasant I see you to play. Good-lucky Jimbo.
andrewc3411 4 years ago
jimmy connors has terrible form. he hits off of his back foot. that's a clay court shot. this guy is mad overrated
230205 4 years ago
oh nvm..its just a weird metal one.
sarkywarky 4 years ago
is he playing with a wooden racquet?
sarkywarky 4 years ago
Haha, still looks the same like 1980. Ok, different racket.
brocanova 4 years ago
LoL, Dastacoman so true. However, if it works.....
Tproshot 4 years ago
wow classic style
abujabi 4 years ago
i love jimbo. that guy knows how to work a crowd. tennis needs arrogant bastards like connors if it wants to become relevant again. :)
dastacoman 4 years ago
it looks like a caveman found a tennis racquet. that backhand could fell a brontosaur.
dastacoman 4 years ago
Look at this clip and watch what professional tennis players like Monaco, Zabaleta and others think about Connors
ZRzymek 4 years ago
This is that clip Tenispro 13/10/06
ZRzymek 4 years ago
Great! I am very happy to see Jimmy hit the ball so well. I wish he would play some matches at the seniors level. He looks fit enough to do so.
ajaykchaudhary 4 years ago
I thought his strokes were crazy but then I saw Connors and he realized he used the same strokes but, obviously!!!, on a whole nother level. I can only imagine how hard his game must be to play against.
daraemkar 4 years ago
I actually have a friend on my school's tennis team who hits almost exactly like Connors, especially the forehand. He is annoying to play because all the little tricks people have dont work on him. Spin, he makes dissapear. Blast the ball at him...his stroke is so simple and quick that unless its a clear winner he nails it back deep and hard with no effort.
daraemkar 4 years ago
It's a shame nobody has the "eyes" to see the genius of his game... short backswing, out in front, greatest return of serve, hit on the rise... these qualities extended his career. All these great athletes of today will not play anywhere near their current level in their early thirties. Yeah, they swing harder, but it tears their bodies up after time. Compare Connors today vs Vilas today... Vilas would get his ass kicked. (Vilas also was my hero) Props to Connors...
maxasianmuscle 4 years ago
You are so right!
ChristianPaul75 4 years ago
And yet with that "awful technique" he won more titles than any player ever. He could have won even more if he hadn´t boycotted certain tournaments for years. So maybe it´s "awful", but highly succesful, or am I wrong?
ChristianPaul75 4 years ago
who gives a shit if his technique is awful? is he playing on the tour? lol no
ohcopulate 4 years ago
still hits a foot out front
saintofallkillers 4 years ago
Lol you can hear Nadal grunt in the background.
Lithium001 4 years ago
I'd put connors in his prime against any current player.. compact, well directed shots.. and a will to win that was unmatched.
gobertub 4 years ago
Looks pretty fit at 55. A living legend! But I agree the technique looks a hundred years old.
BashfulBob 4 years ago
he has the worst-looking technique compared to the modern game now
tenis101010 4 years ago
You obviously don't know shit.
marina78th 4 years ago
notice he isnt using a racquet with a split throat or a large head
Imagine these 100sq in players having to deal with that..
lambro39 4 years ago
Obviously, he has the most incredible moving body in tennis history, his wrist did'nt have the same ability as the modern top spiners, but his backhand is still the greatest in tennis history, even Laver agrees...
xaxaxa22 4 years ago