@greenman3610 sez"you keep repeating it, yet it does not become true"
Oh I see, but when YOU repeat something, or reference something, that makes it true.
As you can see from these videos there are Scientists on Both sides of the argument. As the temp changes each is looked back on as a predictor of the future.
Its like the climate models, you create hundreds & one is bound to be correct.
Then you make a video smugly showing how smart you are
The climate models are not actually models you know they are spherical crystal devices that when hands are laid on them a swirling mist reveals what will be happening in the future, failing that the backup system is used which employs a china teacup and some old fashioned tea, not the baggy stuff and voila predictions that would have as much bearing on reality as a climatologist riding the train of plenty.
I've been using your video as a source or a starting point to get deniers to check their facts.If this issue wasn't so important I'd say I was having fun.Thanks again.
Well, it's that time of the year again in New England that I have to re-post this video on Facebook. It's sad that I have to keep re-posting this year after year and yet every year someone I know makes this argument.
0:55 No such thing as a reliable average temperture since climate change has and always will happen regardless if we breath of not.
1:18 rankings going back a little over a century?!? What was the temperature like before then? The Earth (even to some religions) is much older than that.
8:12 - 8:27 again the data sets are taken from recent years as little as 120 years ago which is not enough to prove any recent warming is man-made and thus a concern.
There are other methods of retrieving tempature data which can tell us a longer history of changes but none were shown.
Also without the Sun then Earth would obviously be an ice rock so by not mentioning what the Sun is doing with respect to climate and temperature we have only got half the picture.
I remember in the first week of December in 2010, everyone was wearing shorts and Jeans and T-shits to school, then there was a storm on the first weekend, and then there was a foot and half of snow
Don't waste time arguing with these climate-denial cultists.
They are criminal traitors, disloyal to national security (the national securities of ALL nations), guilty of crimes against humanity.
They are not mentally capable of understanding that the place for their debates are at climate conferences and IPCC meetings and in peer-reviewed climate journals and in computer models. Not the internet. Not in their idealistic high-school-debate-club-style debate.
They have red dots on the UK. We have NOT had a warm summer at all. Showing a graphic does not prove anything, living through it does though. Global warming is a hoax, just another way of extorting more taxes out of us poor saps. If there was any warming it is because the sun is gradually heating up not because of the car we drive. Wise up numpties!
Cancer is just a hoax, another way of extorting money from the public via drugs that don't work. Notice how cancer appears to be relatively recent, join the DOTS and you'll see the conspiracy! Notice how frequently we come across "drugs" that "cure" diseases or cover up symptoms- logically this means that disease were all just manmade to force people to buy medicines!
Pity I cannot post web addresses on here, but I am aware of a recent NASA peer reviewed report saying that alarmists will have to rethink their global warming hypothesis, because the atmosphere is not heating up as one would have expected from the climate models.
I can't remember where I read it, but I think I heard that some Nobel winning scientist said climate denial came from a pathological compulsion to spread rumor and innuendo, coupled with an innate inability to cite sources.
@oomblikkies Don't waste your breathe on these fools because they will not listen. The cult has made up its mind. If u r even the slightest bit skeptical u r quickly dismissed as a "climate denier"!! It is impossible to have a logical debate because a debate requires both parties to posses some form of reasoning. No matter the data u present if it contradicts their belief it is "climate denial propaganda". Or a paid shill of the oil companies...Even though big oil lobbied for it!!
@oomblikkies If you weren't a complete idiot you could put the title of the report up and let us Google it. Or you could do what everyone else on youtube does and spell the periods as (dot). Maybe you can find your article as climate(dot)NASA(dot)gov(slash)evidence. Oops, nope that all says climate change is man made, dangerous and real.
Carbon tax is a disgusting crime against Humanity. CO2 whether man-made or otherwise doesn't drive global climate, it never has, it never will, the Sun does...
More extreme cold events are also a part of "global warming", or anthropomorphic climate change. The warmer the atmosphere, the more it expands and the more moisture it can hold. At the equator the troposphere can reach 40k ft, while only being 20k at the poles. Moisture is the fuel, and one of the key components of any type of storm. Not only does global warming claim there will be more extreme cold weather, when you just step back and think about it, as I explained, it makes sense.
@raymitch7410 Global warming does not MAKE anything colder. It MAKES more precipitation.
That means rather than -5 deg C but dry all winter
you might get -4 deg C but a ton of snow, which DOES cause all the retard cherrypicking manmade climate change deniers to crawl out from the rocks and spread their lies.
lrresponsible stupidity is not acling on the monstrous risks associated with man made global warming. Fact proved: CO2 ABSORBS HEAT & 50% IS TRANSMITTED. BACK TO EARTH FACT: COMBUSTION PRODUCTS INCLUDE CO2 & Man has put high amounts into the ecosystem Strong Indications: the earth's natural ability to handle this without increAsing temps & associated adverse environmental influences is a reality
The only reason things are so bad now is because humans have ravaged the planet. Intrudicing invasive species, wiping out animals and plant species, etc. has severly harmed biodiversity. It was warmer beforeand it wasnt the end of the world. Because the gene pool that plants and animals pull from has shrunk they have trouble adapting, and this is because they do not have the diversity to do so (quickely). Plus they have less space to do it in.
its not just carbon releated products,the corrupt senators and reps in dc are guilty of insider trading that would get wall street brokers sentanced to serious jail time. Chris Dodd is a serioius offender, but we had no problem allowing him to "reform" the markets, its like joe kennedy when he worked for FDR to reform the system with regulations that were targetting the very same tactics that he got rich off of, joe kennedy was evil
There will always be record warm and record cold events - but the record shows that record warm events are now exceeding record cold by 2 to 1 in the US.
@greenman3610 we have record breaking storms dating back long ago before blogging, the internet and fox news :P....people seem to forgot the galaxy around us and everything going on in the universe which has a massive impact on the earth, weather is unpredictable....you think that record breaking storms and disasters are being caused by a few pop cans and some plastic bottles...lol the government came up with the imaginary global warming to make humans think we have control when we really dont.
@jackolan76 Well its late December in Minnesota and its been above freezing many days (its at 50f right now!) and we have almost no snow on the ground... so yeah it is warmer. Of course the whole thing is GLOBAL not LOCAL so local weather says nothing about the long term trends.
Arthur Laffer The so-called “Father of Supply-Side Economics,” was key economic adviser to President Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1989 now claims
"Cap and trade ‘economy killer"’
according to U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy electric costs have gone up every year in every state so where do you get electric rates declined?
Since you guys are in the mood for cap and trade. Can we agree that anyone EVER involved in the regulation and policy are to never be able to be involved with a carbon trading company? It seems to me that some politicians and friends are on the board of company s that are poised to be a brokers of carbon credits. I am not a denier but I am a skeptic especially when political corruption is involved. Alot of people feel cap& trade is a fraud being perpetrated by the left side of politics.
@MiracleMile90 Not Alaska, but the Pacific Northwest. We only got our first 70 degree day 2 weeks ago, and that was for one day. It's been cold ever since.
We are going to get 2 days at 70 Thursday and Friday and then it drops down to a high of 58 for the weekend.
I remember when may was summer weather here in May, but no more. There was only 2 weeks last year were I didn't need to wear a jacket.
Hi all, just trying to spread the word about a new community site we're putting together based around our planet - earth-forums (dot) com. Take a look if you'd like!
Asking a conservative to "look at the context" is like asking a dog to not sniff another dog's ass! It wont happen, they do it instinctively! With all the evidence that proves they are wrong the best they can do is talk about the Vikings and blame Al Gore! Deliberately stupid people make me sick!!
OMG global warming absolute bullshit this happens all the time the media goes on rants it's cooling it warming ice age!! record high's absolute non-sense cilmiate fluxuates.
The only thing people need to realize is that even if the insane amounts of CO2 and hydrocarbons that we are constantly pumping into the atmosphere aren't causing global warming (go back to middle school if you don't believe that), what we are doing isn't right and we need to utilize our so easily available and abundant, clean, and more effective fuel sources.
The AGW contrarians haven't been able to prove conclusively that it isn't anthropogenic CO2 driving GW. On the other hand, the climate scientists have multiple lines of empirical evidence that support the theory that GW is driven by anthropogenic CO2.
I'm afraid the onus is on the contrarians to provide empirical evidence for their claims.
ALL these Al Gore Band-Wagon (anti Oil) "Chicken Little's" they know not the SCI but run around blindly repeating what others say, making OTHER Rich from free advertisement .. I remember NASA was accused of making holes in the OZONE, JETS con-trails making it warmer.. but ever since AL GORE's un-Proven DATA movie they all fallow like chickens without any thinking "heads" now that NASA has Earth Sci team they use NASA's data??? LOL this is so funny how tides change. STUPID PPL should shut up !!
The other scam is wanting to regulate co2 emissions. The whole idea is to swap carbon credits from companies that do not use there alotted co2 in manufacting and selling it to the ones that use to much. This does not stop or slow down the ammount of co2 it just redistributes it. What it does do it create a buisness to be the broker for that co2 and all the main players in propagating this lie are invested in it. That it why and you know it. Al Gore has done it in Europe.
Cap and Trade, developed under Ronald Reagan, was successfully used to bring acid rain emissions under control in the early 1990s, while allowing electrical rates to actually decilne.
One mechanism or another of putting a price on carbon will eventually be adopted globally, so using one with a successful track record seems appropriate.
@tjkc59 im pretty sure the main goal for carbon credits is to put a cost on pollution. at the moment my understanding is most companies can just pump co2 into the air. but with carbon credits this will cost money to pump co2 so the companies that will survive/remain competitive are the ones that invest in pollution reducing technologies.
If its warming why? Naturally? c02 Did you know the sea levels changed when humans were not here? did you know climate change was around before man could manipulate it? did you know the continents were moving across the ocean before man? Did you know were not all idiots? Did you knoe Al gore's main income it to promote the global warming scam?
@tjkc59 ok i do not care whether global warming is natural or man made. the evidence points towards global warming and this global warming is causing issues and will cuase issues into the future. no matter the cause we can slow it down or reverse it by reducing our co2 emmisions. natural global warming is just as bad as manmade global warming and we should do as much as we can to keep the world the way it is right now.
If global warming was real why would al gore's house leave a larger carbon footprint than the average americans? Obvuously he doesnt believe that it is actually happening and just wants to keep making money off of you gullable people.
Of course global warming is real. No one denies it. To say the global coolers deny is also false. The real question is, is this warming anthropogenic. This is where the crap begins. No one can prove satisfactorily that this is unnatural or that CO2 is the blame. The CO2 increase is a result of ocean warming that occurred 800 years ago. Slide the temp changes 800 years back and you get a pretty good match for the CO2 rise coming out of the oceans now.
There's a myth that TV weathermen know something about climate. John Coleman is, of course, laughably ignorant and misinformed about this issue.
I would say if you are interested in a meteorological perspective, try the American Meteorological Society, the American Geophysical Union, or the Geological Society of America - They, along with every other relevant scientific body on the planet, agree, it's real, we're doing it, the consequences are dire, and we need to stop.
Do ANY of you "climate change/global warming" believers realize what a dumbass scam "science" really is? They all compete for funding. You don't think THAT has to do with what they come up with in their bullshit "research?" Scientist are GIVEN orders BY the government to FIND a way to TRY to not --PROVE-- a theory BUT MAKE IT BELIEVABLE to douchebags like the one who made this video. You don't think the government just forks over that cash to not make any, do you??? SO gullible, you are.
@greenman3610 Yeah and they want YOU to believe they know how global warming works when the technology to make ANY kind of global warming "discoveries" are all accurate and cover EVERY factor contributing to global warming, correct? My point to you is it is STILL a THEORY and has not been proven. It has just been made BELIEVABLE to fools like you so you bow to their every demand to fight it WHEN THEY WERE THE ONES THAT CAUSED THIS SHIT IN THE FIRST PLACE. It's just BACKWARD ass thinking.
@crackerwv Excuse me for the fragmented thought. The technology to derive this science is not only new, it is funded by people who personally BENEFIT from the research. They do not INCLUDE what could be infinite numbers of factors contributing to so-called climate change. This "science" not only falsifies their number to make them FIT their theories instead of PROVING them, they compete for funding to do so. It's asanine to think they are telling the truth.
@greenman3610 Glenn Beck is a tart and so is Alex Jones. Don't accuse me of what you do not know. I'm WAY past those idiots. I actually research what they say and find the truth AND the lies behind them. You don't. Obviously. Look, just remove all my comments. I'm not going to convince you because you are like trying to convince a 3 year old santa claus doesn't exist. You don't want to believe it. You hate it, but you will find out it is true soon enough. Good luck. You need it.
= Glenn Beck is a tart and so is Alex Jones. I'm WAY past those idiots. =
Greatest comment ever! (Actually, Alex Jones has ONE redeeming value: he speaks out against bankster financial terrorists - but, big whoop - so does 99% of the population now.)
@TheDuneMan92 Do ANY of you "climate change/global warming" believers realize what a dumbass scam "science" really is? They all compete for funding. You don't think THAT has to do with what they come up with in their bullshit "research?" Scientist are GIVEN orders BY the government to FIND a way to TRY to not PROVE a theory BUT MAKE IT BELIEVABLE to idiots like the one who made this video. You don't think the government just forks over that cash to not make any, do you??? SO gullible, you are.
@TheDuneMan92 And another thing. YOUR "theories" are just as much as a THEORY as mine. The government's is a conspiracy against the people. YOU defend that. That's just sad. Instead of defending the PEOPLE, you defend some government owned statistician set up to squeeze you for taxes. The thing is, the "evidence"YOU BELIEVE (lacking credibility) in the form of numbers and statistics that DO NOT IMPLY CAUSATION WITHIN ITSELF is where YOU, like most other people that believe "scientists" FAIL.
@TheDuneMan92 First off, you are TOTALLY missing the point. I DO NOT BELIEVE in science written by some dumbass scientists. You, as an archaeology major should know that you cannot believe the HISTORY that is in your history books. It's a compilation of bullshit in a book. It means nothing. I know what I SEE. What I KNOW, not some statistic that has millions of factors. That's the thing YOU people are so gullible. You'll believe anything BUT the truth. Where's YOUR fucking evidence, you tart.
@TheDuneMan92 Keep talking that bullshit and maybe something that actually supplies some evidence to support your bullshit theories might grow from it if you plant the seed of research with the fertilizer of ignorance.
@TheDuneMan92 And you believe the government and all the scientists they hire to squander tax money in the form of research on global warming which is COMPLETE fraud...and you fall for it. I think I know a bit more about this than some idiot that still cannot site and valid research or explain the millions of factors involved in climate change. You are extremely gullible. That's the only thing I have learned from you.
@TheDuneMan92 After seeing how much you are in denial of what really happened in history and how you think the government is just squeaky clean in all of this environmental bullshit, I know how is the lost cause and it ain't me.
@TheDuneMan92 See, here's the problem and the reason you retards don't understand. YOU ARE GIVING ME INFORMATION FROM THE SAME FUCKING PEOPLE THAT LIED TO YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE. Now, go watch Piers Corbyn. I read real science. Not this rif raf.
we, as a society, must stop attacking each other and truly attempt to find and seek the answers to everything that threatens our way of life. I read the comments below and see so much anger for those that simply share a perspective...I understand there are doubts, but together so much more can be accomplished. Be passionate, but do not seek the destruction of those you disagree with, no one group is always right, and a counter argument is always valuable whether right or wrong.
This video AND global warming theories are complete foolishness. You know the BIGGEST problem with these idiot "scientists?" They can't seem to understand that they are trying to measure and test for consistency where there is NONE. Things change. The sun changes, flares and gets spots. The moon's gravitational field has effects. Cosmic radiation. "Climate change" morons forget there are things OUTSIDE the earth that that are impossible to keep track of and gauge to be consistent in effect.
@greenman3610 What kind of response is that? 150 years investigation of WHAT? A bunch of bullshit that half the so called scientific evidence doesn't even take the SUN into consideration? What the HELL are you talking about? First it's global warming. Then it's cooling. Then it's warming again. Then they can't get their carbon tax passed so they just call it "climate change?" I can't BELIEVE people fall for this ignorant shit when there are millions of factors unaccounted for. Wow....just wow.
@greenman3610 pffft. for who? you? What do you mean digging? I already buried you once and embarrassed you so bad you erased my comments and didn't answer me. I'll debate you. Let's roll. Ask your first question so I can own you like I did a few months ago.
@greenman3610 Since you're chicken, I'll start with a question. Explain to me how Al Gore got a 529 million dollar grant using global warming to build electric cars in Finland? Explain how he then bought 2 8 million dollar homes in California? Explain your chemtrail denial when the evidence is in patent 3899144, the 2008 CFR geoengineering conference documents, project cloverleaf, cloud seeding docs and HAARP weather modification documents? Answer this THEN I'll get into the REAL science.
@A11ex Typical answer from a typical retard that doesn't have an answer and resorts to insults. Come back when you have something relevant to say, please. Then I want you to show me one thing in that statement that is wrong. Look it up for yourself THEN come back and show me.
Somebody's still eating to many crayons in preschool.
See, I can do what you do. Now show me you can do what I do.
@A11ex It amazes me you people believe in man made global warming you cannot see or cannot prove but you SEE chemtrails, read the reports on them, see the documentation on HAARP + chemtrails ionospheric heating, see the documentation on project cloverleaf, aluminum's spraying effect on plant DNA, Monsanto's patent 7582809 for ALUMINUM resistant GMO seeds, cloud seeding, weather modifications, CFR documents...and you still believe they do not exist...but what I believe is CONSPIRACY? Mmmmk.
@CrustVegan I prefer to look up things myself unlike 99.99999% of the people that believe shit like this video and believe everything Al Gore (who BY THE WAY, FAILED out of FOUR colleges) and give credence to others that probably don't know the chemical structure of CO2 much less prove that it causes "global warming." I find it amazing people still DEFEND people that want to TAX them for MADE UP SCIENCE even EXIST. To me, it's like looking at a fossil and coming here to see the real version.
@SuperInfective Ah, another uninformed dupe insulting me lacking credibility and more importantly, evidence. Once again, I shall state this simply. You're an asshole. Now...see? I can insult you, too. I'm not looking for insults. I'm looking for one of you idiots that think you know more than me to ACTUALLY prove me wrong. Can you do it or will I get more kindergarten conjecture? When are you going to realize you are way out of your league?
@crackerwv Al Gore didn't provide any scientific research, he simply made a movie. Throwing shit at Al Gore, justified or not, doesn't prove anything.
@CrustVegan It's not just him that lies. Throwing out some of the largest NATURAL sources of CO2 is also very misleading. Mt. Pinatubo released more CO2 into the atmosphere in a single eruption in the early 90's than man has in their entire history. While climate change may be happening, it is NATURAL for it to happen just like the changing of the seasons or with other anomalies. Though it can be manipulated by man regionally with technology, it is not CREATED by man. That idea is asinine.
@greenman3610 You seriously believe that? You think CO2 has more of an effect than WATER which holds in 98% of the earth's heat? Or the SUN? You know, the big ball of flaming gas that's 100's of times larger than earth? Who are you trying to kid with this bullshit psuedoscience? What I know is way above your head. No use even trying to explain it to an idiot.
@greenman3610 I'm not watching any of the garbage you post because it's not real science. If I want to watch a real scientist, I'll watch Piers Corbyn or someone who makes sense not someone streaming the global warming scam so they can collect money in taxes off idiots like you on the Chicago Carbon Credit Exchange that believe in this cult new age global warming/climate change religion shit. Give me a break. Site some REAL science. This is a waste of my time.
@greenman3610 I've read some of your comments. You are as uniformed as a box of rocks. What the fuck kind of evidence do YOU have? SO I guess we're supposed to believe what every scientist tells us? Yeah, they're so right about everything. lol The world used to be flat you know. Scientists SWORE it was...so I guess it was according to your little fantasy world. Why do I ever bother with dumbasses like you. Good grief.
@greenman3610 Climate scientists don't deny it. What you have to realize about science is you can have one scientist who disagrees with every other in the entire world and that one scientist can be the correct one.
Its the same in politics! In 1936 the only politician to oppose Hitler in Britain was Winston Churchill!
My point about climate change is this. Regardless of your view it is politically exploited to bring tax increases.
It's easy to find "one scientist" who has invented an anti gravity device, reverse engineered flying saucer technology, or can cure your cancer with quartz crystals. Climate Denier Lord Monckton claims he not only knows more than every climate scientist on the planet, but has cured malaria, AIDS, and the common cold. Alas, not everyone is Galileo.
This series reports mainstream science. You are welcome to follow any snake oil salesman you like.
@TheDuneMan92 After searching, I cannot find one legitimate, respected historian that denies the holocaust and there are hundreds and hundreds of legitimate, respected scientists who deny that global warming is man made so your statement is not accurate.
@TheDuneMan92 Thanks dune. I agree with some of what you are saying except for the holocaust part but please keep in mind I am not talking about scientist who deny global warming but rather those who deny it is man made. If you only compared those who deny it altogether then I could understand your comparison, though still pretty harsh.
@TheDuneMan92 That is erroneous and misleading dune. There is more involved than just orbital forcing and solar cycles and the many, many scientist who do believe in global warming and global cooling but do not believe it is man made are not anything like ignorant holocaust deniers and I would assume they would all feel like that is a very unfair and unrealistic comparison.
@TheDuneMan92 Thanks Dune. I like science and look at it as a hobby so I appreciate the info. There are hundreds of scientist who do not believe the current warming cycle has anything to do with man's behavior. That is the real debate that cannot be won on either side. I am convinced there is a lot more evidence that these cycles have been going on long before we ever had engines then there is that man is causing global warming.
The agnostics, atheists, evolutionists and naturalists say, "Natural disasters are not increasing as the Bible says they will. We just have a better ability to measure and keep record of them now." Then they say, "The Earth is in great danger from our SUV's because we are heating the Earth up and we can show this through our modern methods of measurement." Can anyone say,"hypocrite!"
"Natural Disasters are not increasing as the Bible Says" =/= "The earth is in Great Danger... because we are heating the Earth." Do you honestly not see how one can say that there are no biblical disasters but there are man-made ones?
False Dichotomies and Red Herrings may work on your illiterate congregation, but please do not attempt to use them on the agnostics, atheists, evolutionists and naturalists who are well versed in your rhetorical tricks.
@Kotszu Since you are so intelligent I am amazed that you missed the actual point. Out of one side of their mouth intelligent people like you say NATURAL disasters are NOT increasing and the only reason that it appears they are is because we can now measure them and keep track of them. Then they say we can show the Earth is heating up with our modern measurements. Point being that the earth has always heated and cooled and now we can measure it. I guess the word bible gave you a brain fart.
This is so full of the same old crap. Notice one news guy said the oceans have been on a cooling trend for several years and then broke some records for warmth "this" year. The earth will always continue its cycles and each generation will have its morons who want to use them for politics and fear mongering. 2009 was colder than usual and now 2010 / 2011 is much colder everywhere. Get a life, get some faith and quit looking stupid.
Josh Willis, a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and his colleagues concluded that the world’s oceans gained heat in the decade from 1993 to 2003. However, a follow-up study for the years 2003 to 2005 showed a surprisingly large decrease in heat content—about 5 times as large as the previous decade’s warming. Josh claims this is just a speed bump on the way to Global Warming.
We could throw data at each other all day. The fact is the earth's cycles continue.
Are you actually trying to tell me that Global Warmist don't cherry pick? I simply gave one result I have seen that contradicts global warming nuts and I could give hundreds just as well as you could to argue for it. The fact is and always will remain that the earth cycles warm and cold and man-made global warming is nonsense. I don't care if you can show the earth is heating up or cooling down. I thought I made that clear from the beginning.
@greenman3610 Peter, don't you get a clue from his "nick"? "Pastor"? Of course it is an ideological game for him. If he says that doesn't care if you can show him that the earth is heating up or cooling down, then we just can declare him as biased. Of course, he can still run around on the internet and repeat his debunked claims, and that will only spread more confusion. But he will not give up his faith (which by the way he also mentioned). Not even with a climate change refugee on his backyard
@GoSiv1 My "faith" is not ignorant bias as you seem to infer. If there was no God and nothing bigger and more complex in control than we can see then I would still believe the overwhelming evidence that earth has always went through cycles or warming and cooling. If I lean to my faith then the Bible says God will allow the earth to be scorched with heat in the last days because of the rebellion of its inhabitants. With "faith" in mind maybe there is global warming taking place as a sign.
@pastorjdh We should stop taking about faith, because it is an un-scientific phrase.
There is no one that says that there hasn't been any cycles before, which has shift between warming and cooling. The problem is that the scientists today can't find any connection between any cycle and the present warming. The only thing that can explain the warming today is CO2. The sun has not been involved this time. A swedish science magazine says that the scientists are worried of the record low in the suns
Thanks for being cordial. Sometimes I forget there are real people behind these videos and internet information. I should not have used the words stupid or nuts or any such thing. I know you mean well and have a sincere sense of alarm. I just think you don't have to go through that or put others through it. When I was a kid many were terrified of global cooling and an approaching ice age. I don't doubt your science but I strongly doubt your finite conclusion. I wish you the best.
Let's believe a video on the Internet great ideal the Internet would never lie. Just to fill you kids in Peter Sinclair has no formal climate education he went to a AL GORE ran Seminar. His only voice is the Internet no networks will give him the time of day. MSNBC wants nothing to do with this guy for a reason there owned by GE "global green bank Chicago, IL" so they love the global warming story
Abe Lincoln founded the National Academy of Science so that the best scientists in the country could help us understand key issues. They've been clear on AGW since 1979. I report what they say, and show the sources and citations.
If you have something to cite as a rebuttal, other than your intolerance of scientific process, bring it.
@phantomscolts2 I asked for the link that proves trillions of dollars have been wasted on global warming awareness, or at least the general cause. But you didn't give me a link to support your argument, nope.. You gave me insults and a ration of shit, trying to steer away from having to back up your arguments with FACTS. Don't worry, I didn't expect you to engage in a factual debate. Reason and logic are not in your inventory. Only insults and raw emotion. Typical. I didn't expect more from you.
Great videos, I think you need to make one of these every year. I constantly hear people say "its cold out, global warming must be false". Maybe a global warming 101 video that explains in general why more intense storms are to be expected as global warming progresses, people just don't understand the basic science or why winter still occors in the northern hemisphere. As I try to explain GW science does not predict an end to winter, at least not yet anyway.... keep up the good work!
Good Vid. All of those dumbasses who refute objective evidence and who fail to understand basic geological processes can go suck Jesse Venturas small wrinkly sack.
@greenman3610 Sorry, isn't the burden of proof on YOU to show the theory matching the results. I realise that climate scientists would like to show the "model" as a proof, but in the rest of the scientific community we're pretty much into objective observation. :-) I joke because I care.
I assume you read Lahouari Bounoua's (NASA) paper "Quantifying the negative feedback of vegetation to greenhouse warming: A modeling approach". It was published in Geophysical Research Letters.
@ascolti ... Don't tell me you're dumb enough to be using "Quantifying the negative feedback of vegetation to greenhouse warming: A modeling approach" in support for your denial of global warming...???
And this year the entire I-95 corridor is virtually snow-less. Cycles.
2012Steelerfan 1 day ago
i like how people childishly fight over the truth. Madder than the fires of hell.
Also they now call it climate change.
garycalgary 1 week ago
"Its So Cold It Cant be Global Warming"
Well now its Warm so It .... Um well gee I guess that makes it Warming too?
I guess it does not matter if its Cold, Warm, Sunny, Cloudy, Hurricanes, No Hurricans...
Somehow the answer is ALWAYS Global Warming.
Right?
Texmurphy51 2 weeks ago
@Texmurphy51
that's right. sorry, but its where we are in history.
greenman3610 2 weeks ago
@greenman3610
At least you ADMIT it is not Really Science.
Science does not close its mind to other alternatives.
Your talking about Belief based on what you think is the truth.
You are no Scientists so your just doing the same as me.
Reading what the so called Experts are saying and giving your opinion.
Texmurphy51 2 weeks ago
@Texmurphy51
actually no.
it's you that give YOUR opinion.
I read what the experts say and relay THEIR opinions.
get it?
greenman3610 2 weeks ago
@greenman3610 "read what the experts say and relay THEIR opinions"
Yes I understand..
Michael Moore does the same thing, like when he showed the medical system was more advanced in Cuba then it is in the US.
Propaganda when crafted properly can get ANY idea across no matter what the truth is.
Once the idea is accepted it rolls on its own.
My example was Global Cooling. It was accepted as FACT until the weather started to warm up.
Same will happen with GW
Texmurphy51 2 weeks ago
@Texmurphy51
"global cooling" nonsense
watch?v=XB3S0fnOr0M
and the more recent incarnation
watch?v=IQHqgdvXTxE
you keep repeating it, yet it does not become true. perhaps you are not wearing your ruby slippers?
greenman3610 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@greenman3610 sez"you keep repeating it, yet it does not become true"
Oh I see, but when YOU repeat something, or reference something, that makes it true.
As you can see from these videos there are Scientists on Both sides of the argument. As the temp changes each is looked back on as a predictor of the future.
Its like the climate models, you create hundreds & one is bound to be correct.
Then you make a video smugly showing how smart you are
Like yours
Texmurphy51 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The climate models are not actually models you know they are spherical crystal devices that when hands are laid on them a swirling mist reveals what will be happening in the future, failing that the backup system is used which employs a china teacup and some old fashioned tea, not the baggy stuff and voila predictions that would have as much bearing on reality as a climatologist riding the train of plenty.
RandomVersion 1 month ago
The most astonishing series you will ever see
Search For
"THE GREAT DISASTERS"
eliasmouawad 1 month ago
I've been using your video as a source or a starting point to get deniers to check their facts.If this issue wasn't so important I'd say I was having fun.Thanks again.
15hmael 2 months ago
Well, it's that time of the year again in New England that I have to re-post this video on Facebook. It's sad that I have to keep re-posting this year after year and yet every year someone I know makes this argument.
quinnmcguee 3 months ago
0:55 No such thing as a reliable average temperture since climate change has and always will happen regardless if we breath of not.
1:18 rankings going back a little over a century?!? What was the temperature like before then? The Earth (even to some religions) is much older than that.
8:12 - 8:27 again the data sets are taken from recent years as little as 120 years ago which is not enough to prove any recent warming is man-made and thus a concern.
cont...
mazk1985 3 months ago
cont...
There are other methods of retrieving tempature data which can tell us a longer history of changes but none were shown.
Also without the Sun then Earth would obviously be an ice rock so by not mentioning what the Sun is doing with respect to climate and temperature we have only got half the picture.
Just a few questions
mazk1985 3 months ago
I remember in the first week of December in 2010, everyone was wearing shorts and Jeans and T-shits to school, then there was a storm on the first weekend, and then there was a foot and half of snow
dave19941000 3 months ago
The implication here is that if you dont think its getting Warmer even when its getting Colder, your just too stupid.
Funny, Hansen's 1988 testamony to Gore & Congress was Warming based on 2 previous HOT summers in the SE US.
This, "its just the weather" stuff just came about since we have been gettin cold weather.
Before that any high temps were compared to the past & of course were...
GLOBAL WARMING.
Hurricanes, No Hurricanes=Warming
What Climate would constitute Cooling?
Texmurphy51 4 months ago
Don't waste time arguing with these climate-denial cultists.
They are criminal traitors, disloyal to national security (the national securities of ALL nations), guilty of crimes against humanity.
They are not mentally capable of understanding that the place for their debates are at climate conferences and IPCC meetings and in peer-reviewed climate journals and in computer models. Not the internet. Not in their idealistic high-school-debate-club-style debate.
mphello 4 months ago
Most people won't believe in Global Warming until they actually witness someone melting in front of their eyes.
emantabrizi 4 months ago
4:55 Firefox?
NameOver9000 4 months ago
Little ice age due 2015? I do hope these warmists are correct in their predictions. Meanwhile keep up the atmospheric co2 enrichment.
david222444 4 months ago
They have red dots on the UK. We have NOT had a warm summer at all. Showing a graphic does not prove anything, living through it does though. Global warming is a hoax, just another way of extorting more taxes out of us poor saps. If there was any warming it is because the sun is gradually heating up not because of the car we drive. Wise up numpties!
caxtonman 4 months ago
@caxtonman
this video is a year and half old.
pay attention.
greenman3610 4 months ago
@caxtonman
Cancer is just a hoax, another way of extorting money from the public via drugs that don't work. Notice how cancer appears to be relatively recent, join the DOTS and you'll see the conspiracy! Notice how frequently we come across "drugs" that "cure" diseases or cover up symptoms- logically this means that disease were all just manmade to force people to buy medicines!
TurboDally 1 month ago
@TurboDally Frightening, but true.
caxtonman 1 month ago
actually winter follows Fall....
amyhuk 4 months ago
Pity I cannot post web addresses on here, but I am aware of a recent NASA peer reviewed report saying that alarmists will have to rethink their global warming hypothesis, because the atmosphere is not heating up as one would have expected from the climate models.
oomblikkies 4 months ago
@oomblikkies
I can't remember where I read it, but I think I heard that some Nobel winning scientist said climate denial came from a pathological compulsion to spread rumor and innuendo, coupled with an innate inability to cite sources.
I'm sure I read that somewhere.
greenman3610 4 months ago
@oomblikkies Don't waste your breathe on these fools because they will not listen. The cult has made up its mind. If u r even the slightest bit skeptical u r quickly dismissed as a "climate denier"!! It is impossible to have a logical debate because a debate requires both parties to posses some form of reasoning. No matter the data u present if it contradicts their belief it is "climate denial propaganda". Or a paid shill of the oil companies...Even though big oil lobbied for it!!
lamiac2411 4 months ago
@oomblikkies If you weren't a complete idiot you could put the title of the report up and let us Google it. Or you could do what everyone else on youtube does and spell the periods as (dot). Maybe you can find your article as climate(dot)NASA(dot)gov(slash)evidence. Oops, nope that all says climate change is man made, dangerous and real.
michalchik 1 month ago
@piclex
Yeah...
I was typing in all caps, kind of looks stupid with punctuations.
Such a meager attempt to dilute me.
You didn't even have an argument .. You just looked at my "error" like a 12 year old kid..
Didn't even have anything intelligent or relevant to say about the subject
SemiazasxXx 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Carbon tax is a disgusting crime against Humanity. CO2 whether man-made or otherwise doesn't drive global climate, it never has, it never will, the Sun does...
The Great Global Warming Swindle [Full Film]
watch?v=T8KgbUvsC_o
Galv140577 5 months ago
Funny you should say that the Cold & Snow are just Weather.
Now that we have had extremely high temperatures in large parts of the US this summer, Guess What.
The Warmings are saying SEE, thats cause of Global Warming.
Now if cold is Global Warming & Heat is Global Warming, what kind of Climate is NOT Global Warming.
Texmurphy51 5 months ago
More extreme cold events are also a part of "global warming", or anthropomorphic climate change. The warmer the atmosphere, the more it expands and the more moisture it can hold. At the equator the troposphere can reach 40k ft, while only being 20k at the poles. Moisture is the fuel, and one of the key components of any type of storm. Not only does global warming claim there will be more extreme cold weather, when you just step back and think about it, as I explained, it makes sense.
raymitch7410 5 months ago
@raymitch7410 Global warming does not MAKE anything colder. It MAKES more precipitation.
That means rather than -5 deg C but dry all winter
you might get -4 deg C but a ton of snow, which DOES cause all the retard cherrypicking manmade climate change deniers to crawl out from the rocks and spread their lies.
mphello 4 months ago
Fact: the last decade sun influence declining CO2 & temps increasing
dmlt12 5 months ago
lrresponsible stupidity is not acling on the monstrous risks associated with man made global warming. Fact proved: CO2 ABSORBS HEAT & 50% IS TRANSMITTED. BACK TO EARTH FACT: COMBUSTION PRODUCTS INCLUDE CO2 & Man has put high amounts into the ecosystem Strong Indications: the earth's natural ability to handle this without increAsing temps & associated adverse environmental influences is a reality
dmlt12 5 months ago
CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT MAN MADE PEROID!!!
ITS THE SUN STUPID
SemiazasxXx 5 months ago
@SemiazasxXx
You can't even spell, or use punctuation.
PICLex 5 months ago
The only reason things are so bad now is because humans have ravaged the planet. Intrudicing invasive species, wiping out animals and plant species, etc. has severly harmed biodiversity. It was warmer beforeand it wasnt the end of the world. Because the gene pool that plants and animals pull from has shrunk they have trouble adapting, and this is because they do not have the diversity to do so (quickely). Plus they have less space to do it in.
dag04211995 5 months ago
cant we just make A LOT of ice blocks and chuck them in the sea?I got a freezer
OM3ALE 6 months ago
its not just carbon releated products,the corrupt senators and reps in dc are guilty of insider trading that would get wall street brokers sentanced to serious jail time. Chris Dodd is a serioius offender, but we had no problem allowing him to "reform" the markets, its like joe kennedy when he worked for FDR to reform the system with regulations that were targetting the very same tactics that he got rich off of, joe kennedy was evil
tsharpmac420 6 months ago
I was in Las Vegas 4 years ago. There was the biggest snow storm there in30 years
Some people living there said they had never seen snow in Vegas. We froze our arse off going from casino to casino. So the world is warming ??
jackolan76 6 months ago
@jackolan76
yes. The world is warming.
There will always be record warm and record cold events - but the record shows that record warm events are now exceeding record cold by 2 to 1 in the US.
rewatch this video --
especially starting at 5:28
greenman3610 6 months ago
@greenman3610 we have record breaking storms dating back long ago before blogging, the internet and fox news :P....people seem to forgot the galaxy around us and everything going on in the universe which has a massive impact on the earth, weather is unpredictable....you think that record breaking storms and disasters are being caused by a few pop cans and some plastic bottles...lol the government came up with the imaginary global warming to make humans think we have control when we really dont.
Crazyman1212 5 months ago
@jackolan76 Well its late December in Minnesota and its been above freezing many days (its at 50f right now!) and we have almost no snow on the ground... so yeah it is warmer. Of course the whole thing is GLOBAL not LOCAL so local weather says nothing about the long term trends.
85Funkadelic 1 month ago in playlist Climate Denial Crock of the Week
Arthur Laffer The so-called “Father of Supply-Side Economics,” was key economic adviser to President Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1989 now claims
"Cap and trade ‘economy killer"’
according to U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy electric costs have gone up every year in every state so where do you get electric rates declined?
unclejay1000 8 months ago
@unclejay1000
for a graph of electricity prices in the 1990s in constant dollars google
eia Electricity Retail Price Fact Sheet
this graph from the EIA shows costs going down in constant dollars.
looking for something more current, but I think this makes the point.
greenman3610 8 months ago
Since you guys are in the mood for cap and trade. Can we agree that anyone EVER involved in the regulation and policy are to never be able to be involved with a carbon trading company? It seems to me that some politicians and friends are on the board of company s that are poised to be a brokers of carbon credits. I am not a denier but I am a skeptic especially when political corruption is involved. Alot of people feel cap& trade is a fraud being perpetrated by the left side of politics.
tjkc59 8 months ago
@MiracleMile90 Not Alaska, but the Pacific Northwest. We only got our first 70 degree day 2 weeks ago, and that was for one day. It's been cold ever since.
We are going to get 2 days at 70 Thursday and Friday and then it drops down to a high of 58 for the weekend.
I remember when may was summer weather here in May, but no more. There was only 2 weeks last year were I didn't need to wear a jacket.
I'd love to have 3 or 4 months of warm weather.
mtravis390 8 months ago
Who are these dip shits????
cyberage100 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi all, just trying to spread the word about a new community site we're putting together based around our planet - earth-forums (dot) com. Take a look if you'd like!
hoppimike 8 months ago
when manhattan goes under maybe wall street will take notice.
vengencefrom1979 9 months ago
winter follows summer. cooling follows warming.Global cooling follows Global warming. Get ready for abrupt cooling.
david222444 9 months ago
Comment removed
david222444 9 months ago
Asking a conservative to "look at the context" is like asking a dog to not sniff another dog's ass! It wont happen, they do it instinctively! With all the evidence that proves they are wrong the best they can do is talk about the Vikings and blame Al Gore! Deliberately stupid people make me sick!!
mrekbass 9 months ago
@mrekbass
Greatest comment ever!
A conservative IS a dog's ass.
mphello 4 months ago
There hasn't been warm weather were I live at for over a year, yet the maps that are shown have red dots and not blue.
mtravis390 9 months ago
@mtravis390
the video is over a year old
greenman3610 9 months ago
@mtravis390: What, do you live in Alaska or something? =)
MiracleMile90 8 months ago
0:20 winter is cold
summer is hot
get that into your head
flyingtoilet1 9 months ago
Winter follows summer? Meh, I guess if your ignoring autumn.
Autumn was always my favourite season :(
TheMattswish 9 months ago
OMG global warming absolute bullshit this happens all the time the media goes on rants it's cooling it warming ice age!! record high's absolute non-sense cilmiate fluxuates.
saw386 9 months ago
The only thing people need to realize is that even if the insane amounts of CO2 and hydrocarbons that we are constantly pumping into the atmosphere aren't causing global warming (go back to middle school if you don't believe that), what we are doing isn't right and we need to utilize our so easily available and abundant, clean, and more effective fuel sources.
trZack 10 months ago
@trZack We are responsible for the gigantic hole in the ozone layer, and that is taught in middle school. You hear what you want, not what you should
splicedenergy 9 months ago
The AGW contrarians haven't been able to prove conclusively that it isn't anthropogenic CO2 driving GW. On the other hand, the climate scientists have multiple lines of empirical evidence that support the theory that GW is driven by anthropogenic CO2.
I'm afraid the onus is on the contrarians to provide empirical evidence for their claims.
wstevenschneider 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL these Al Gore Band-Wagon (anti Oil) "Chicken Little's" they know not the SCI but run around blindly repeating what others say, making OTHER Rich from free advertisement .. I remember NASA was accused of making holes in the OZONE, JETS con-trails making it warmer.. but ever since AL GORE's un-Proven DATA movie they all fallow like chickens without any thinking "heads" now that NASA has Earth Sci team they use NASA's data??? LOL this is so funny how tides change. STUPID PPL should shut up !!
canectar 10 months ago
The other scam is wanting to regulate co2 emissions. The whole idea is to swap carbon credits from companies that do not use there alotted co2 in manufacting and selling it to the ones that use to much. This does not stop or slow down the ammount of co2 it just redistributes it. What it does do it create a buisness to be the broker for that co2 and all the main players in propagating this lie are invested in it. That it why and you know it. Al Gore has done it in Europe.
tjkc59 10 months ago
@tjkc59
Cap and Trade, developed under Ronald Reagan, was successfully used to bring acid rain emissions under control in the early 1990s, while allowing electrical rates to actually decilne.
One mechanism or another of putting a price on carbon will eventually be adopted globally, so using one with a successful track record seems appropriate.
greenman3610 10 months ago
@tjkc59 im pretty sure the main goal for carbon credits is to put a cost on pollution. at the moment my understanding is most companies can just pump co2 into the air. but with carbon credits this will cost money to pump co2 so the companies that will survive/remain competitive are the ones that invest in pollution reducing technologies.
maccaaccam99 8 months ago
If its warming why? Naturally? c02 Did you know the sea levels changed when humans were not here? did you know climate change was around before man could manipulate it? did you know the continents were moving across the ocean before man? Did you know were not all idiots? Did you knoe Al gore's main income it to promote the global warming scam?
tjkc59 10 months ago
@tjkc59
perhaps you should inform the Geological Society of America of your keen insights.
I'll bet they never thought of this information before publishing their statement on man caused climate change.
Stupid, elitist scientists and their "facts".
greenman3610 10 months ago
@tjkc59 So do you not believe it is warming at all or just not believe that it is us that is causing it?
Clarice1933 10 months ago
@tjkc59 OMGyou got so PWNED!
dumbnetworks 9 months ago
@tjkc59 ok i do not care whether global warming is natural or man made. the evidence points towards global warming and this global warming is causing issues and will cuase issues into the future. no matter the cause we can slow it down or reverse it by reducing our co2 emmisions. natural global warming is just as bad as manmade global warming and we should do as much as we can to keep the world the way it is right now.
maccaaccam99 8 months ago
If global warming was real why would al gore's house leave a larger carbon footprint than the average americans? Obvuously he doesnt believe that it is actually happening and just wants to keep making money off of you gullable people.
Furriesarecute 10 months ago
Of course global warming is real. No one denies it. To say the global coolers deny is also false. The real question is, is this warming anthropogenic. This is where the crap begins. No one can prove satisfactorily that this is unnatural or that CO2 is the blame. The CO2 increase is a result of ocean warming that occurred 800 years ago. Slide the temp changes 800 years back and you get a pretty good match for the CO2 rise coming out of the oceans now.
wayne487msc 10 months ago
guy at the begining is crazy!!!
kak775 10 months ago
Tell all this bullshit to the weather channel founder John Coleman whom says global warming is crap garbage science.
These are the same scientist that tey to prove men originated from the big bang theory and alien bacteria.
PrayerCoach 10 months ago
@PrayerCoach
There's a myth that TV weathermen know something about climate. John Coleman is, of course, laughably ignorant and misinformed about this issue.
I would say if you are interested in a meteorological perspective, try the American Meteorological Society, the American Geophysical Union, or the Geological Society of America - They, along with every other relevant scientific body on the planet, agree, it's real, we're doing it, the consequences are dire, and we need to stop.
greenman3610 10 months ago
Tell all this bullshit to the weather channel founder John Coleman whom says global warming is crap garbage science.
PrayerCoach 10 months ago
@PrayerCoach ARGUMENT FROM AUTHORITY FALLACY ALERT
jacobromu 10 months ago
Do ANY of you "climate change/global warming" believers realize what a dumbass scam "science" really is? They all compete for funding. You don't think THAT has to do with what they come up with in their bullshit "research?" Scientist are GIVEN orders BY the government to FIND a way to TRY to not --PROVE-- a theory BUT MAKE IT BELIEVABLE to douchebags like the one who made this video. You don't think the government just forks over that cash to not make any, do you??? SO gullible, you are.
crackerwv 10 months ago
@crackerwv
right.
science wants you to believe the earth is more than 5000 years old.
That's like, crazy, man.
greenman3610 10 months ago
@greenman3610 Yeah and they want YOU to believe they know how global warming works when the technology to make ANY kind of global warming "discoveries" are all accurate and cover EVERY factor contributing to global warming, correct? My point to you is it is STILL a THEORY and has not been proven. It has just been made BELIEVABLE to fools like you so you bow to their every demand to fight it WHEN THEY WERE THE ONES THAT CAUSED THIS SHIT IN THE FIRST PLACE. It's just BACKWARD ass thinking.
crackerwv 10 months ago
@crackerwv Excuse me for the fragmented thought. The technology to derive this science is not only new, it is funded by people who personally BENEFIT from the research. They do not INCLUDE what could be infinite numbers of factors contributing to so-called climate change. This "science" not only falsifies their number to make them FIT their theories instead of PROVING them, they compete for funding to do so. It's asanine to think they are telling the truth.
crackerwv 10 months ago
@crackerwv
it is asinine to accuse the global scientific community of mounting an unprecedented conspiracy, unless you can document it.
The voices in Glenn Beck's head do not constitute peer reviewed documentation.
greenman3610 10 months ago
@greenman3610 Glenn Beck is a tart and so is Alex Jones. Don't accuse me of what you do not know. I'm WAY past those idiots. I actually research what they say and find the truth AND the lies behind them. You don't. Obviously. Look, just remove all my comments. I'm not going to convince you because you are like trying to convince a 3 year old santa claus doesn't exist. You don't want to believe it. You hate it, but you will find out it is true soon enough. Good luck. You need it.
crackerwv 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@crackerwv
= Glenn Beck is a tart and so is Alex Jones. I'm WAY past those idiots. =
Greatest comment ever! (Actually, Alex Jones has ONE redeeming value: he speaks out against bankster financial terrorists - but, big whoop - so does 99% of the population now.)
mphello 4 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 Do ANY of you "climate change/global warming" believers realize what a dumbass scam "science" really is? They all compete for funding. You don't think THAT has to do with what they come up with in their bullshit "research?" Scientist are GIVEN orders BY the government to FIND a way to TRY to not PROVE a theory BUT MAKE IT BELIEVABLE to idiots like the one who made this video. You don't think the government just forks over that cash to not make any, do you??? SO gullible, you are.
crackerwv 10 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 And another thing. YOUR "theories" are just as much as a THEORY as mine. The government's is a conspiracy against the people. YOU defend that. That's just sad. Instead of defending the PEOPLE, you defend some government owned statistician set up to squeeze you for taxes. The thing is, the "evidence"YOU BELIEVE (lacking credibility) in the form of numbers and statistics that DO NOT IMPLY CAUSATION WITHIN ITSELF is where YOU, like most other people that believe "scientists" FAIL.
crackerwv 10 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 First off, you are TOTALLY missing the point. I DO NOT BELIEVE in science written by some dumbass scientists. You, as an archaeology major should know that you cannot believe the HISTORY that is in your history books. It's a compilation of bullshit in a book. It means nothing. I know what I SEE. What I KNOW, not some statistic that has millions of factors. That's the thing YOU people are so gullible. You'll believe anything BUT the truth. Where's YOUR fucking evidence, you tart.
crackerwv 10 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 Keep talking that bullshit and maybe something that actually supplies some evidence to support your bullshit theories might grow from it if you plant the seed of research with the fertilizer of ignorance.
crackerwv 10 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 And you believe the government and all the scientists they hire to squander tax money in the form of research on global warming which is COMPLETE fraud...and you fall for it. I think I know a bit more about this than some idiot that still cannot site and valid research or explain the millions of factors involved in climate change. You are extremely gullible. That's the only thing I have learned from you.
crackerwv 10 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 After seeing how much you are in denial of what really happened in history and how you think the government is just squeaky clean in all of this environmental bullshit, I know how is the lost cause and it ain't me.
crackerwv 10 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 See, here's the problem and the reason you retards don't understand. YOU ARE GIVING ME INFORMATION FROM THE SAME FUCKING PEOPLE THAT LIED TO YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE. Now, go watch Piers Corbyn. I read real science. Not this rif raf.
crackerwv 10 months ago
test
diffusedlight 11 months ago
we, as a society, must stop attacking each other and truly attempt to find and seek the answers to everything that threatens our way of life. I read the comments below and see so much anger for those that simply share a perspective...I understand there are doubts, but together so much more can be accomplished. Be passionate, but do not seek the destruction of those you disagree with, no one group is always right, and a counter argument is always valuable whether right or wrong.
mattofp 11 months ago
1337 likes. <3
Hankatu 11 months ago
This video AND global warming theories are complete foolishness. You know the BIGGEST problem with these idiot "scientists?" They can't seem to understand that they are trying to measure and test for consistency where there is NONE. Things change. The sun changes, flares and gets spots. The moon's gravitational field has effects. Cosmic radiation. "Climate change" morons forget there are things OUTSIDE the earth that that are impossible to keep track of and gauge to be consistent in effect.
crackerwv 11 months ago
@crackerwv
no facts, no citations, no evidence, obvious ignorance of the 150 years of investigation -
coupled with absolute certainty.
Thanks for your enlightening contribution.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 What kind of response is that? 150 years investigation of WHAT? A bunch of bullshit that half the so called scientific evidence doesn't even take the SUN into consideration? What the HELL are you talking about? First it's global warming. Then it's cooling. Then it's warming again. Then they can't get their carbon tax passed so they just call it "climate change?" I can't BELIEVE people fall for this ignorant shit when there are millions of factors unaccounted for. Wow....just wow.
crackerwv 11 months ago
@crackerwv
you're digging a deeper hole, my friend.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 pffft. for who? you? What do you mean digging? I already buried you once and embarrassed you so bad you erased my comments and didn't answer me. I'll debate you. Let's roll. Ask your first question so I can own you like I did a few months ago.
crackerwv 11 months ago
@greenman3610 Since you're chicken, I'll start with a question. Explain to me how Al Gore got a 529 million dollar grant using global warming to build electric cars in Finland? Explain how he then bought 2 8 million dollar homes in California? Explain your chemtrail denial when the evidence is in patent 3899144, the 2008 CFR geoengineering conference documents, project cloverleaf, cloud seeding docs and HAARP weather modification documents? Answer this THEN I'll get into the REAL science.
crackerwv 11 months ago
@crackerwv Someone inhaled to much chemtrails XD
A11ex 11 months ago
@A11ex Typical answer from a typical retard that doesn't have an answer and resorts to insults. Come back when you have something relevant to say, please. Then I want you to show me one thing in that statement that is wrong. Look it up for yourself THEN come back and show me.
Somebody's still eating to many crayons in preschool.
See, I can do what you do. Now show me you can do what I do.
crackerwv 11 months ago
@A11ex It amazes me you people believe in man made global warming you cannot see or cannot prove but you SEE chemtrails, read the reports on them, see the documentation on HAARP + chemtrails ionospheric heating, see the documentation on project cloverleaf, aluminum's spraying effect on plant DNA, Monsanto's patent 7582809 for ALUMINUM resistant GMO seeds, cloud seeding, weather modifications, CFR documents...and you still believe they do not exist...but what I believe is CONSPIRACY? Mmmmk.
crackerwv 11 months ago
@crackerwv Alex Jones much?
CrustVegan 11 months ago
@CrustVegan I prefer to look up things myself unlike 99.99999% of the people that believe shit like this video and believe everything Al Gore (who BY THE WAY, FAILED out of FOUR colleges) and give credence to others that probably don't know the chemical structure of CO2 much less prove that it causes "global warming." I find it amazing people still DEFEND people that want to TAX them for MADE UP SCIENCE even EXIST. To me, it's like looking at a fossil and coming here to see the real version.
crackerwv 11 months ago
@crackerwv You just mentioned HAARP conspiracies, And officially declared yourself as a crackpot!
Conglaturation!
SuperInfective 11 months ago
@SuperInfective Ah, another uninformed dupe insulting me lacking credibility and more importantly, evidence. Once again, I shall state this simply. You're an asshole. Now...see? I can insult you, too. I'm not looking for insults. I'm looking for one of you idiots that think you know more than me to ACTUALLY prove me wrong. Can you do it or will I get more kindergarten conjecture? When are you going to realize you are way out of your league?
crackerwv 11 months ago
@crackerwv Al Gore didn't provide any scientific research, he simply made a movie. Throwing shit at Al Gore, justified or not, doesn't prove anything.
CrustVegan 11 months ago
@CrustVegan It's not just him that lies. Throwing out some of the largest NATURAL sources of CO2 is also very misleading. Mt. Pinatubo released more CO2 into the atmosphere in a single eruption in the early 90's than man has in their entire history. While climate change may be happening, it is NATURAL for it to happen just like the changing of the seasons or with other anomalies. Though it can be manipulated by man regionally with technology, it is not CREATED by man. That idea is asinine.
crackerwv 11 months ago
@crackerwv
for actual figures on volcanoes, google US Geological survey
usgs volcanic gases climate
humans release 100 times as much as volcanoes annually.
also see
watch?v=WPA-8A4zf2c
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 You seriously believe that? You think CO2 has more of an effect than WATER which holds in 98% of the earth's heat? Or the SUN? You know, the big ball of flaming gas that's 100's of times larger than earth? Who are you trying to kid with this bullshit psuedoscience? What I know is way above your head. No use even trying to explain it to an idiot.
crackerwv 11 months ago
@crackerwv
water vapor and climate
watch?v=LAtD9aZYXAs
solar effects
watch?v=_Sf_UIQYc20
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 I'm not watching any of the garbage you post because it's not real science. If I want to watch a real scientist, I'll watch Piers Corbyn or someone who makes sense not someone streaming the global warming scam so they can collect money in taxes off idiots like you on the Chicago Carbon Credit Exchange that believe in this cult new age global warming/climate change religion shit. Give me a break. Site some REAL science. This is a waste of my time.
crackerwv 11 months ago
@CrustVegan Best comment ever!
mphello 4 months ago
@crackerwv
talking about Al Gore is another way to say "I got nuthin so I'll just wave my arms"
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 I've read some of your comments. You are as uniformed as a box of rocks. What the fuck kind of evidence do YOU have? SO I guess we're supposed to believe what every scientist tells us? Yeah, they're so right about everything. lol The world used to be flat you know. Scientists SWORE it was...so I guess it was according to your little fantasy world. Why do I ever bother with dumbasses like you. Good grief.
crackerwv 11 months ago
Comment removed
crackerwv 11 months ago
GW SUCKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA'S
areyoulookinatmepal1 11 months ago
good video facts not media hype thanks
olympic66power 11 months ago
What is / Where is an "average temperature?"
Load of rubbish.
STOPTHEEU 11 months ago
@STOPTHEEU
generally an average is considered a global average during a specified base period, like 1961 - 1990.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 Well thats where your error is. Climate change occurs naturally. Only a fool would deny that.
STOPTHEEU 11 months ago
@STOPTHEEU
Only a fool would say that climate scientists deny that.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 Climate scientists don't deny it. What you have to realize about science is you can have one scientist who disagrees with every other in the entire world and that one scientist can be the correct one.
Its the same in politics! In 1936 the only politician to oppose Hitler in Britain was Winston Churchill!
My point about climate change is this. Regardless of your view it is politically exploited to bring tax increases.
STOPTHEEU 11 months ago
@STOPTHEEU
It's easy to find "one scientist" who has invented an anti gravity device, reverse engineered flying saucer technology, or can cure your cancer with quartz crystals. Climate Denier Lord Monckton claims he not only knows more than every climate scientist on the planet, but has cured malaria, AIDS, and the common cold. Alas, not everyone is Galileo.
This series reports mainstream science. You are welcome to follow any snake oil salesman you like.
greenman3610 11 months ago
problem is that many of the red dots are in locations where temperature measurements are not as reliable or quality controlled.
lakeerie90s 11 months ago
@lakeerie90s
satellite measurements are in agreement with land and sea based instruments.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 After searching, I cannot find one legitimate, respected historian that denies the holocaust and there are hundreds and hundreds of legitimate, respected scientists who deny that global warming is man made so your statement is not accurate.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 Thanks dune. I agree with some of what you are saying except for the holocaust part but please keep in mind I am not talking about scientist who deny global warming but rather those who deny it is man made. If you only compared those who deny it altogether then I could understand your comparison, though still pretty harsh.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 That is erroneous and misleading dune. There is more involved than just orbital forcing and solar cycles and the many, many scientist who do believe in global warming and global cooling but do not believe it is man made are not anything like ignorant holocaust deniers and I would assume they would all feel like that is a very unfair and unrealistic comparison.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
@TheDuneMan92 Thanks Dune. I like science and look at it as a hobby so I appreciate the info. There are hundreds of scientist who do not believe the current warming cycle has anything to do with man's behavior. That is the real debate that cannot be won on either side. I am convinced there is a lot more evidence that these cycles have been going on long before we ever had engines then there is that man is causing global warming.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
Man, fuck our children, it's only the global elite's children that matter anyway...
canisdormit 11 months ago
Are the oceans rising?
irritatinglilpryk 11 months ago
If people still don't get the difference between Weather and Climate, they can always see this movie:
watch?v=wUiwtVSkUwQ&feature=related
GoSiv1 11 months ago
Comment removed
pastorjdh 11 months ago
The agnostics, atheists, evolutionists and naturalists say, "Natural disasters are not increasing as the Bible says they will. We just have a better ability to measure and keep record of them now." Then they say, "The Earth is in great danger from our SUV's because we are heating the Earth up and we can show this through our modern methods of measurement." Can anyone say,"hypocrite!"
pastorjdh 11 months ago
@pastorjdh
Er. Fallacy much?
"Natural Disasters are not increasing as the Bible Says" =/= "The earth is in Great Danger... because we are heating the Earth." Do you honestly not see how one can say that there are no biblical disasters but there are man-made ones?
False Dichotomies and Red Herrings may work on your illiterate congregation, but please do not attempt to use them on the agnostics, atheists, evolutionists and naturalists who are well versed in your rhetorical tricks.
Kotszu 11 months ago
@Kotszu Since you are so intelligent I am amazed that you missed the actual point. Out of one side of their mouth intelligent people like you say NATURAL disasters are NOT increasing and the only reason that it appears they are is because we can now measure them and keep track of them. Then they say we can show the Earth is heating up with our modern measurements. Point being that the earth has always heated and cooled and now we can measure it. I guess the word bible gave you a brain fart.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
Comment removed
pastorjdh 11 months ago
This is so full of the same old crap. Notice one news guy said the oceans have been on a cooling trend for several years and then broke some records for warmth "this" year. The earth will always continue its cycles and each generation will have its morons who want to use them for politics and fear mongering. 2009 was colder than usual and now 2010 / 2011 is much colder everywhere. Get a life, get some faith and quit looking stupid.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
@pastorjdh
see NASA. 2009 was the second warmest year in the record. google
nasa 2009 second warmest
2010 was the warmest. google
nasa 2010 warmest year
for graphs, google
nasa key indicators
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610
Josh Willis, a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and his colleagues concluded that the world’s oceans gained heat in the decade from 1993 to 2003. However, a follow-up study for the years 2003 to 2005 showed a surprisingly large decrease in heat content—about 5 times as large as the previous decade’s warming. Josh claims this is just a speed bump on the way to Global Warming.
We could throw data at each other all day. The fact is the earth's cycles continue.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
@pastorjdh
Well, if you're dishonest and cherry pick an inaccurate result, yeah.
google
nasa observatory josh willis
for good graphs, google
nasa key indicators
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610
Are you actually trying to tell me that Global Warmist don't cherry pick? I simply gave one result I have seen that contradicts global warming nuts and I could give hundreds just as well as you could to argue for it. The fact is and always will remain that the earth cycles warm and cold and man-made global warming is nonsense. I don't care if you can show the earth is heating up or cooling down. I thought I made that clear from the beginning.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
@pastorjdh
Well, the difference is, I try to be correct in my information. Now you say,
" I don't care if you can show the earth is heating up or cooling down."
It's all an ideological game for you. but it won't be for our grandchildren.
Try actually reading the science, starting with the NASA link I sent you. Humility is a good thing.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 Peter, don't you get a clue from his "nick"? "Pastor"? Of course it is an ideological game for him. If he says that doesn't care if you can show him that the earth is heating up or cooling down, then we just can declare him as biased. Of course, he can still run around on the internet and repeat his debunked claims, and that will only spread more confusion. But he will not give up his faith (which by the way he also mentioned). Not even with a climate change refugee on his backyard
GoSiv1 11 months ago
@GoSiv1
right, I got it. but it still is an opportunity to point lurkers to real data.
Some folks you'll never get engaged in a discussion of facts.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@GoSiv1 My "faith" is not ignorant bias as you seem to infer. If there was no God and nothing bigger and more complex in control than we can see then I would still believe the overwhelming evidence that earth has always went through cycles or warming and cooling. If I lean to my faith then the Bible says God will allow the earth to be scorched with heat in the last days because of the rebellion of its inhabitants. With "faith" in mind maybe there is global warming taking place as a sign.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
@pastorjdh We should stop taking about faith, because it is an un-scientific phrase.
There is no one that says that there hasn't been any cycles before, which has shift between warming and cooling. The problem is that the scientists today can't find any connection between any cycle and the present warming. The only thing that can explain the warming today is CO2. The sun has not been involved this time. A swedish science magazine says that the scientists are worried of the record low in the suns
GoSiv1 11 months ago
@GoSiv1 output.
GoSiv1 11 months ago
@GoSiv1 You brought up faith, I put it to the side.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pastorjdh So did I. I just said it because your faith is your opinion, not based on overwhelming evidence.
GoSiv1 11 months ago
@greenman3610
Thanks for being cordial. Sometimes I forget there are real people behind these videos and internet information. I should not have used the words stupid or nuts or any such thing. I know you mean well and have a sincere sense of alarm. I just think you don't have to go through that or put others through it. When I was a kid many were terrified of global cooling and an approaching ice age. I don't doubt your science but I strongly doubt your finite conclusion. I wish you the best.
pastorjdh 11 months ago
Let's believe a video on the Internet great ideal the Internet would never lie. Just to fill you kids in Peter Sinclair has no formal climate education he went to a AL GORE ran Seminar. His only voice is the Internet no networks will give him the time of day. MSNBC wants nothing to do with this guy for a reason there owned by GE "global green bank Chicago, IL" so they love the global warming story
dieseldudee 11 months ago
@dieseldudee
Abe Lincoln founded the National Academy of Science so that the best scientists in the country could help us understand key issues. They've been clear on AGW since 1979. I report what they say, and show the sources and citations.
If you have something to cite as a rebuttal, other than your intolerance of scientific process, bring it.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@phantomscolts2 I asked for the link that proves trillions of dollars have been wasted on global warming awareness, or at least the general cause. But you didn't give me a link to support your argument, nope.. You gave me insults and a ration of shit, trying to steer away from having to back up your arguments with FACTS. Don't worry, I didn't expect you to engage in a factual debate. Reason and logic are not in your inventory. Only insults and raw emotion. Typical. I didn't expect more from you.
SexSteakSoda 1 year ago
Great videos, I think you need to make one of these every year. I constantly hear people say "its cold out, global warming must be false". Maybe a global warming 101 video that explains in general why more intense storms are to be expected as global warming progresses, people just don't understand the basic science or why winter still occors in the northern hemisphere. As I try to explain GW science does not predict an end to winter, at least not yet anyway.... keep up the good work!
useockhamsrazor 1 year ago
Good Vid. All of those dumbasses who refute objective evidence and who fail to understand basic geological processes can go suck Jesse Venturas small wrinkly sack.
blacksabbathgnr098 1 year ago
Can't be bothered with you eso whatever. Zzzzz
ascolti 1 year ago
Same old bad data, same old poor conclusions. Same old "models = scientific proof".
ascolti 1 year ago
@ascolti
please show where in the video models have been cited as proof of anything, or cited at all.
greenman3610 1 year ago
@greenman3610 Sorry, isn't the burden of proof on YOU to show the theory matching the results. I realise that climate scientists would like to show the "model" as a proof, but in the rest of the scientific community we're pretty much into objective observation. :-) I joke because I care.
I assume you read Lahouari Bounoua's (NASA) paper "Quantifying the negative feedback of vegetation to greenhouse warming: A modeling approach". It was published in Geophysical Research Letters.
ascolti 1 year ago
@ascolti
if you have a critique of the video, make it. But your statement that somewhere in the vid there are "models" is inaccurate.
it is also misinformed to say that climate science depends on models, any more than any other hard science.
The primary evidence for AGW is 1) actual data in the paleo-record 2) the known radiative properties of greenhouse gases.
greenman3610 1 year ago
@ascolti ... Don't tell me you're dumb enough to be using "Quantifying the negative feedback of vegetation to greenhouse warming: A modeling approach" in support for your denial of global warming...???
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC I'm sorry, did I say I was denying "global warming" or is that just an assumption you've made in order to make some pathetic point.
ascolti 1 year ago