Added: 3 years ago
From: SilentSlayers
Views: 4,900
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nice

  • the one at the right side was fester I think :P

  • So is it faster to LJ, then to 6 frame jump-dive then dive again?

    talking about the left 1 =)

  • Jump kick long jump should be the fastest.

  • IT WAS A TIE Tie breaker :]

  • ho win??

  • right one..

    :3

  • omg silent slayers ur amazing I love all ur videos omg dat was cool 5*

  • That was an awesome find, I have to admit

  • Another great video from him!

  • Lol nice!

  • The right one made it first.

  • I think we all have noticed that.

  • shame thats real sexy

  • You sure the one on the left can't be optimized further?

  • Nearly positive.

  • perhaps a jump kick to replace that running? other than that, i think it's probably optimized. thanks for trying. so close!

  • We both know the jump kick isn't going to save 3 frames. :)

    I doubt it'll even save one tbh. It isn't that much faster than running.

  • yeah. the main problem is that anything that can be done to save enough time getting to the stairs would most likely have an equivalent use for the 0-star run.

    ....also, couldn't you have used the beginning you used for the new idea, then do the side blj on the bottom or second step? it looks like you start to blj a little quicker that way.

  • I was thinking about this and it might be possible to save 1 frame but I dunno. I'm lazy.

  • i guess it depends on which step you can make it onto. the first step would need less running frames, but the higher steps need less air time on the starting long jump. according to SL, it could also be possible that different steps have different max speeds. this'll be a bitch to test out >_>. too bad i really can't since i don't have MHS......or is that not needed for this due to the camera?

  • It's not needed to one who understands the BLJ and speeds. It is nice to MHS it if you are doing it for one of the first times though.

  • wow, too close :P

  • Two different ways to get in, one single result. That's pretty cool.

  • wow, soo close to being the same framewise!

  • Cool. Nice find on the clip of the right.

    5/5

  • left*

  • Quality is great if you watch it in high quality.

  • What program did you use was it really called wax?

  • Yeah, I think so.

  • This program is hard to use I found it

  • Nice, I never thought of doing it that way. Too bad it's slower.

  • Thanks. :P

  • I did it for Bob in a video of his, this one is more optimized.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more