These 2 players could have given a lot of competion to Federer between 2004 and 2007 for the N°1 but they both lacked the profesionalism and determination Roger had.
3:58 the ball bounce only once and then his racquet hit the net...... i thought the rule was that if any part of your body, clothing, accesories hits the net you lose automaticly the point, because the ball still didnt bounce twice, so it was on play. When my dampener came off my racquet and flew to my opponent court while the ball was in play; my opponent claim the point. When i confirm it with the officials thye agreed with him. Similar case?
These guys are amazing players just look at the shot makin i wished they played each other morr cuz when their on almost no one can beat them to bad nalbandian hasnt put it together for a major title
I think Nalbandian and Safin are both very talented players and there really isn't much to choose between them.
Seems as if Nalbandian has given Federer more problems than Safin, however. Although post masters 2003, Federer has lost a total of 4 times to both, while beating both a combined total of about 18 times.
On a side note, Nalbandian has said that he finds Safin the most difficult opponent to play against (he does have a 3-6 record against him)
no estoy de acuerdo con vos... cuando David estuvo enfocado y en forma (me refiero a peso corporal y ritmo de entrenamiento constante) no solo les gano, sino que les dio una paliza tremenda a federer en su mejor momento y despues lo cago a palos junto a nadal dos veces seguidas en los masters de paris y madrid, googlea opiniones de roger sobre los demas jugadores y vas a encontrar que el mismo dijo que david no era el mejor porque no queria, y creo que roger sabe algo de tenis...
Mmmh no, Safin's BH DTL/CC aren't obviously better than Nalbandians, maybe for you but for the majority of the rest of the people (including Federer and Nadal) Nalbandians are not only better than Safins but also better than the rest of the pros in the ATP tour.
Safin's BH was good enough to take down a pime vintage 2005 Federer (do not even compare 2005 Fed to 2007 Fed where Nalbandian played him) I mean, 2005 Fed was the best Federer of all time, only 2006 can come close... Safin wins...
Nalbandian beat Federer in the Masters Cup final of 2005 so you may wanna get your facts straight, besides Nalbandian has beaten Roger 8 times while Safin has only beaten him twice.
however, i honestly believe current fed is even more incredible, more lax, and every shot has pretty much been mastered by now, it's just a matter of will.
Disagree. BH was superb. If you watch the Masters Cup final vs Blake or against Nadal in the semis or at Wimby or any number of tournaments, you will see that it was powerful and precise.
That is why he had such a dominant year in 2006. Everything was working perfectly, from his game to his mental strength.
@tennisboi nono!!!! nalbandian´s two handed backhand is the best ever!!! in form david is the best player in tennis history (but he likes food, womens, alcohol...) jajaja
@Sen1Sky and now i hope you are joking- no even Tennis magazine ranked his bh as the best of the open era! but you must know more than them... safin was not mentioned once in the article, not even for his style- shock. (oh btw they asked the top tennis pros and retired players and commentators their opinion and then compiled the results)... sen1sky- the phrase 'eat it' is in order.
@Sen1Sky agassi's backhand was a short stroke meant to take the ball early only. short, compact swing meant to absorb pace of the ball and redirect.. it wasnt a thing of beauty but it made him hundreds of millions
There was nothing wrong with allowing Nalbandian challenge that call, I remember the match. It was a Safin serve that was out a Nalbandian missed the return because of that serve so I don't see how that call shouldn't have been allowed to challenge.
You're wrong, there isn't such rule, 'cause if there was Nalbandian wouldn't have been allowed to challenge, simple as that. Besides think about it: A guy hits a 130 MPH serve that is out, you can barely touch the ball but the shot goes obviously out, why wouldn't you be allowed to challenge that call?
And Nalbandian had no trouble beating Safin in striaght sets in the davis cup final later that year.
I watched the game, I even remember that Safin had match point serving at what should have been 40-30 but Grillioti fucked up and said 30-15 but it doesn't matter 'cause Safin didn't win any more points in that game.
And I didn't say anything about Safin's level of prior or after 2005.
talent is an important part of success, but not all of it. some people think currently ranked 24 Gasquet is actually got more talented than federer. I would say will and mental mean more to a champion
i agree... thats why even though gasquet may be more talented than fed.. fed just has the will and mental power that most players lack... but when it comes down to working hard... nobody works harder for a point than nadal or hewitt
search Gasquet highlight on youtube, or if you always watch he play. you can see he hits a lot of AMAZING shots, but he is the one who ALWAYS lost in those matches. sometime he doesnt know what the hell himself is doing. I think(just my opinion) needs is get mentally though. Considering some guys won their first grand slam when they were 17, Fed is kinda late when he won his 1st grand slam(almost 21). so, Fed must had a hard time before that, a genius without any achievement.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
what the fuck nalbandian and safin are more talented then Federer???? Who the fuck won 13 grand slam ?? So stop said Shit on youtube u fuking looser. Nobody is more talented then Fed. He is the God son send for tennis! Noob
Look, I agree with you on Fed being real talented (big Fed fan here), but you have to admit than Marat and David are immensely talented individuals, also.
It's a shame both of those players have underachieved in their respective careers.
Hmm.. Safin has won 2 grand slams, was n°1 ranked... He didn't waste so much his carreer. Maybe Nalbandian more, but it's more because of his physical (which is very very bad when you watch now Nadal, Monfils or Djokovic). If he would have improve it he definitively could have won a slam.
or i have another version...you're just drunk...so go fall asleep for 6-7 hours and when you're done, we'll maybe have some debates about who's right and who's wrong...now please leave me be...i dont want to waste my time on drunk whore who's IQ is even lower then YETI's...
yeah ? ...and thats why Safin won 2 Grand Slams and outplayed Sampras himself on USOpen 2000 when Nalbandian won none of Grand Slams ? ...how about that dickhead ?!
...that is not an argument...i see where you're coming from you cant even type correctly...i understood like 10 percents of all that what you've typed...i advice you to buy some dictionary because you really need one...
i miss seeing nalbandian playing in the league of the top 3 guys in tennis. my favorite is nadal but when i saw how he beat the top 3 in madrid last year, i added him in my radar. he's brilliant. too bad i seldom see him in championships. good work at davis cup 2008, though.
If you are talking about at the moment. Roddick's results as of late have shown that. Nalbandian's results have also been poor, but like Safin, he has a chance to let his talent shine.
Roddick isnt in the same league as nalbandian and safin. Im not talking about results, im talking about talent. Roddick is great but if all players were playing at their BEST it would rank nalbandian 1st, safin 2nd n roddick third. Roddick is a good player but if they were all playing their best he wouldnt stand a chance against these two. Talent and results are two very different things.
To me safin and nalbandian are the best players on the tour, even though safin isn't playing his best at the moment. I really hope that safin wil l be back in top 10 soon, cause safin, nalbandian and murray have the best game for me.
nalbandians prob the most talented player after fed...id say even more so than nadal.. for some reason he doesnt seem to be able to hold it together long enough..
i wouldn't say so. When talking about talent we're mostly talking about technique wise. When u first seen Federer u knew he was already something special. Federer, Nalbandian and Safin talents are on the same line.
On pure talent alone Fed is still the greatest although Safin & Nalbandian are no doubt his closest rivals in that regard (very close indeed). As GyariSan said, Fed's natural technique is just too crisp in every department. Naturally, Fed's every shot barring his bachand is better than these guys.
why would he want tobe like canas. david has been 3 in the world and made it to the semis of every slam. canas has never been past a quarter final. david has had a better career than canas so why should he try to be lie someone who is less talented and does nothing but moonball and run down shots
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Obviously Marat is the best! he was number 1. David wasn´t, and the ranking ATP Marat has the best place than David. David you´re a looser....you dissapoint me even I being argentinian, you must learn from Guillermo Cañas. shame on you!!!!!!
both of them have the potential to compete at the same level as federer, nadal, djokovic.. they just don't try that hard, look at nalbandian he has just won ATP Madrid 2007 beating the best 3 players :P
3:20, does safin get the point for that? or not because of his racquet touching the net?
verdugorobs 1 month ago
@verdugorobs Don't think so; I might be wrong but I think the racket left his hand when
he hit the ball (and the racket has to be in your hand and not "thrown").
sarasmilepiano 1 week ago
These 2 players could have given a lot of competion to Federer between 2004 and 2007 for the N°1 but they both lacked the profesionalism and determination Roger had.
tomyrosicky 2 months ago
poetry
89Pleasek 1 year ago
2 amazing players with amazing backhands
1972Scorpions2010 1 year ago
epic matchup!
ikazooka 1 year ago
3:58 the ball bounce only once and then his racquet hit the net...... i thought the rule was that if any part of your body, clothing, accesories hits the net you lose automaticly the point, because the ball still didnt bounce twice, so it was on play. When my dampener came off my racquet and flew to my opponent court while the ball was in play; my opponent claim the point. When i confirm it with the officials thye agreed with him. Similar case?
copavida 1 year ago
These guys are amazing players just look at the shot makin i wished they played each other morr cuz when their on almost no one can beat them to bad nalbandian hasnt put it together for a major title
2xRyanx5 1 year ago
safin is excellent, and those ball girls are ridiculously delectable.
BrotherTree1 1 year ago
both are my favourite players with Agassi and Davydenko
Ashot007Armenian 1 year ago
Their backhands are so awesome... but Safin's strokes (both of them!) are killer-strong!
asdfuogh 1 year ago
@asdfuogh but still, safin should have won this match at 6-5 serving for the match in the 3rd. was up 30-0
BrotherTree1 1 year ago
My two favorite 2handed-backhands, amazing.
lucasmelee 1 year ago
Awesome match!
niclassj 1 year ago
@niclassj This was one of the worst matches I've ever seen between two top players, the quality certainly wasn't "awesome".
MaratSafinVideos 1 year ago
@MaratSafinVideos ur just saying that coz safin lost lol
Sen1Sky 1 year ago
@Sen1Sky You obviously didn't watch the match. You're probably about 10 judging by your spelling.
SoooBlue 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SoooBlue "This match was horrible, from a Safin fans perspective" yup that pretty much sums it up.
Sen1Sky 1 year ago
@Sen1Sky Yeah he rarely gives a Safin opponent credit.
karelduin 1 year ago
i think his size overwhelms or even intimidates people.
JUSfr34k 1 year ago 2
@JUSfr34k safin's size... or nalbandian...'s belly? hahahhahaa
asdfuogh 1 year ago
never really knew about Nalbandian.
He's a beast.
JUSfr34k 1 year ago
king david lives!!! xD
efriiiin 2 years ago
I think Nalbandian and Safin are both very talented players and there really isn't much to choose between them.
Seems as if Nalbandian has given Federer more problems than Safin, however. Although post masters 2003, Federer has lost a total of 4 times to both, while beating both a combined total of about 18 times.
On a side note, Nalbandian has said that he finds Safin the most difficult opponent to play against (he does have a 3-6 record against him)
Ryan81M 2 years ago
@Ryan81M Put simply, Marat is a bigger, stronger version of David.
sarasmilepiano 1 week ago
What happened to safin' s forehand ? in fact he is hitting big forehands here.
129pieter 2 years ago
you see, escapedconvict....nalbandian is better.
sharpasaneraser 2 years ago
como aburre el argumento ese 'nalbandian es un genio y tiene mas talento que cualquier otro, pero como no entrena...."
Como si el gordo hubiera inventado la joda y la falta de dedicacion, o que es el unico que no le mete 100% de ganas.
Si mi abuelita tuviera ruedas seria un auto, dejense de joder.
tincho25 2 years ago
no estoy de acuerdo con vos... cuando David estuvo enfocado y en forma (me refiero a peso corporal y ritmo de entrenamiento constante) no solo les gano, sino que les dio una paliza tremenda a federer en su mejor momento y despues lo cago a palos junto a nadal dos veces seguidas en los masters de paris y madrid, googlea opiniones de roger sobre los demas jugadores y vas a encontrar que el mismo dijo que david no era el mejor porque no queria, y creo que roger sabe algo de tenis...
carocero 1 year ago
0:44 ....wow! Safin got more juice on his strokes !
AlexIsUber 2 years ago
safins BH DTL/CC are obviously better than nalbandians.
EscapedC0nvict 2 years ago
Mmmh no, Safin's BH DTL/CC aren't obviously better than Nalbandians, maybe for you but for the majority of the rest of the people (including Federer and Nadal) Nalbandians are not only better than Safins but also better than the rest of the pros in the ATP tour.
COCHIfz 2 years ago 2
just my opinion, don't get too pissy at the fact that safin won 2 slams and david has 0.
Just goes to show how cruddy nalbandians game is if he does have the best BH on tour.
EscapedC0nvict 2 years ago
lol I'm not pissed, you on the other hand do sound like that.
And the reason Nalbandian doesn't have any grand slam ('till now) is:
A) his serve: with a serve like Safins he would have won some majors.
and B) His lack of dedication and physical preparation for a profesional tennis player.
I think the fact that he is a perennial top ten having a body of a 40 year old with a beer tummy speaks volume of his game.
COCHIfz 2 years ago
nalbandian is the best player in the world, but the beer, the womans, the food... jajaj
but yes, in form is better than roger, rafa, djokovich, murray, etc
carocero 1 year ago
Safin's BH was good enough to take down a pime vintage 2005 Federer (do not even compare 2005 Fed to 2007 Fed where Nalbandian played him) I mean, 2005 Fed was the best Federer of all time, only 2006 can come close... Safin wins...
LDis1 2 years ago
Nalbandian beat Federer in the Masters Cup final of 2005 so you may wanna get your facts straight, besides Nalbandian has beaten Roger 8 times while Safin has only beaten him twice.
COCHIfz 2 years ago
Federer had an injured ankle in that match....
LDis1 2 years ago
And yet he beat the crap out of everyone except Nalbandian.
COCHIfz 2 years ago
i don't think fed 05 was the best fed of all time, his backhand in 05 was still shakey. 07 was prime fed.
gabe228 2 years ago
What do you think about 2006 Federer? That is a bit better than 2005 or 2007.
LDis1 2 years ago
@LDis1
yeah, 06-07 fed for sure
however, i honestly believe current fed is even more incredible, more lax, and every shot has pretty much been mastered by now, it's just a matter of will.
gabe228 2 years ago
Yeah, he has every shot in the book by now, but his speed and footwork have slowed down a little bit.
2010 could be a fun year if Nalbandian gets going, He seems to like playing vs Federer.
LDis1 2 years ago
06 was Fed at his very best. You will not see better.
Ryan81M 2 years ago
06 fed was not his very best, backhand was not refined.
gabe228 2 years ago
Disagree. BH was superb. If you watch the Masters Cup final vs Blake or against Nadal in the semis or at Wimby or any number of tournaments, you will see that it was powerful and precise.
That is why he had such a dominant year in 2006. Everything was working perfectly, from his game to his mental strength.
Ryan81M 2 years ago
@gabe228 but everything else was, compared to todays federer.
BrotherTree1 1 year ago
NOU
argentinodiegomarado 2 years ago
The best 2handed backhands ever :)
Matyaz84 2 years ago 24
@Matyaz84 ur forgetting agassi and djokovic.
VerdascoFan 1 year ago
@Matyaz84 after agassi's of course
tennisboi 1 year ago
@tennisboi nono!!!! nalbandian´s two handed backhand is the best ever!!! in form david is the best player in tennis history (but he likes food, womens, alcohol...) jajaja
carocero 1 year ago
@tennisboi i hope that was a joke, not to mention Agassi's backhand is the ugliest backhand of life.Safin had both substance and style.
Sen1Sky 1 year ago 2
@Sen1Sky and now i hope you are joking- no even Tennis magazine ranked his bh as the best of the open era! but you must know more than them... safin was not mentioned once in the article, not even for his style- shock. (oh btw they asked the top tennis pros and retired players and commentators their opinion and then compiled the results)... sen1sky- the phrase 'eat it' is in order.
tennisboi 1 year ago
@tennisboi that's just one magazine, im sure if atp made a list safin would be near the top
Sen1Sky 1 year ago
@Sen1Sky agassi's backhand was a short stroke meant to take the ball early only. short, compact swing meant to absorb pace of the ball and redirect.. it wasnt a thing of beauty but it made him hundreds of millions
cj397 10 months ago
@cj397 very true but he ran alot around his backhand, but ya i still agree with you
Sen1Sky 10 months ago
These groundstrokes are quite amazing. Its a shame that both players are now pale shadows of their former selves especially Safin
cam230723 2 years ago
This match was horrible, from a Safin fans perspective. He was a shadow of the man who hammered Nalbandian in the 2004 final.
Plus, Grilloti let Nalbandian challenge a ball he shouldn't have been allowed near the end and it screwed Marat over big style.
SoooBlue 2 years ago
There was nothing wrong with allowing Nalbandian challenge that call, I remember the match. It was a Safin serve that was out a Nalbandian missed the return because of that serve so I don't see how that call shouldn't have been allowed to challenge.
COCHIfz 2 years ago
There is a rule, you can't challenge after you hit the ball, he missed, so he challenged. Simple.
Safin is shit post 2005 due to injury and Nalbandian still struggled to beat him.
SoooBlue 2 years ago
You're wrong, there isn't such rule, 'cause if there was Nalbandian wouldn't have been allowed to challenge, simple as that. Besides think about it: A guy hits a 130 MPH serve that is out, you can barely touch the ball but the shot goes obviously out, why wouldn't you be allowed to challenge that call?
And Nalbandian had no trouble beating Safin in striaght sets in the davis cup final later that year.
COCHIfz 2 years ago
I doubt you even watched the match, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Yes, and so he should have, if you think Safin is the same player as 2005 and prior then you're even more deluded than I already thought.
SoooBlue 2 years ago
I watched the game, I even remember that Safin had match point serving at what should have been 40-30 but Grillioti fucked up and said 30-15 but it doesn't matter 'cause Safin didn't win any more points in that game.
And I didn't say anything about Safin's level of prior or after 2005.
COCHIfz 2 years ago
two of my favorite players on tour
v2174230322 2 years ago 15
the best safin, but nalballdian was magnific that match
Disordy 2 years ago
3:33 WOW!!!
RoyalGrigsby 2 years ago
The best groundstrokes in the tour. Beauty shots.
cristianmassagana 2 years ago
The best twi handed backhands of the tour.
cristianmassagana 2 years ago
i'm sorry, but Gasquet is crap. He has nice strokes, but he'll never amount to anything. The truth hurts.
turdferguson2 2 years ago
talent is an important part of success, but not all of it. some people think currently ranked 24 Gasquet is actually got more talented than federer. I would say will and mental mean more to a champion
leotom1990 3 years ago
i agree... thats why even though gasquet may be more talented than fed.. fed just has the will and mental power that most players lack... but when it comes down to working hard... nobody works harder for a point than nadal or hewitt
xXxFatalClawxXx 3 years ago
dude tell me when u see gasquet was more talented then fed? gasquet is just a overrated kid
maccoke7 3 years ago
search Gasquet highlight on youtube, or if you always watch he play. you can see he hits a lot of AMAZING shots, but he is the one who ALWAYS lost in those matches. sometime he doesnt know what the hell himself is doing. I think(just my opinion) needs is get mentally though. Considering some guys won their first grand slam when they were 17, Fed is kinda late when he won his 1st grand slam(almost 21). so, Fed must had a hard time before that, a genius without any achievement.
leotom1990 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what the fuck nalbandian and safin are more talented then Federer???? Who the fuck won 13 grand slam ?? So stop said Shit on youtube u fuking looser. Nobody is more talented then Fed. He is the God son send for tennis! Noob
maccoke7 3 years ago
Woah! Be cool, maccoke.
Look, I agree with you on Fed being real talented (big Fed fan here), but you have to admit than Marat and David are immensely talented individuals, also.
It's a shame both of those players have underachieved in their respective careers.
JesterToy 3 years ago 4
Hmm.. Safin has won 2 grand slams, was n°1 ranked... He didn't waste so much his carreer. Maybe Nalbandian more, but it's more because of his physical (which is very very bad when you watch now Nadal, Monfils or Djokovic). If he would have improve it he definitively could have won a slam.
Killerpropol 2 years ago
....Sampras?
cometoart 2 years ago
duh...erm what ? your people...oh my...now i see you're really drunk...
Summon256 3 years ago
or i have another version...you're just drunk...so go fall asleep for 6-7 hours and when you're done, we'll maybe have some debates about who's right and who's wrong...now please leave me be...i dont want to waste my time on drunk whore who's IQ is even lower then YETI's...
Summon256 3 years ago
awesome tennis too bad safin lost hes so talented
deleon19 3 years ago
thaTS fuuny, he doesnt have 1% of nal bandians talnt
888edward888 3 years ago
yeah ? ...and thats why Safin won 2 Grand Slams and outplayed Sampras himself on USOpen 2000 when Nalbandian won none of Grand Slams ? ...how about that dickhead ?!
Summon256 3 years ago
ur a coq smokin fg, probably russian grbage. also no 0 abou ttennis fukof
888edward888 3 years ago
...that is not an argument...i see where you're coming from you cant even type correctly...i understood like 10 percents of all that what you've typed...i advice you to buy some dictionary because you really need one...
Summon256 3 years ago
apologies in regards to my inacuurate typing, my people who take care of this r away this week. enjoy.
888edward888 3 years ago
big bang tennis...2 of the hardest hitters in tennis ...
MesenkoHadow 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
correction is all players played their best,
1st would pe Feliciano Lopez,2nd would be Nalbandian, 3rd Safin, and 4th Roddick
asianwasabi2 3 years ago
Riiiiiiiiiight ^^
niclassj 3 years ago
i miss seeing nalbandian playing in the league of the top 3 guys in tennis. my favorite is nadal but when i saw how he beat the top 3 in madrid last year, i added him in my radar. he's brilliant. too bad i seldom see him in championships. good work at davis cup 2008, though.
greyer2020 3 years ago
que grande marat
davidriverplate 3 years ago 2
did safin lose that point where he dove because his racquet flew and hit the net?
turdferguson2 3 years ago
he won it
bibiliotina 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he got the point
vajkaat 3 years ago
is nalbandian vs safin
lol
ulysses00001 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i hate nalbandian
nipal1234 3 years ago
why?
davidriverplate 3 years ago
nalbandian hoy en dia esta mejor ubicado q safin
klautsy 3 years ago
Nalbandian tiene talento para ser uno de los 5 o 6 mejores pero para mi safin es aun mas talentoso.
kala140290 3 years ago
high quality match
too bad for safin though
BarelyListening15 3 years ago
dude if u dont have consistency ull never be in the top of anything fact!!!
pabb22 3 years ago
they are my HEROES!!!! i wish i had their backhands =.=
dlcndgh234 3 years ago
I don´t think so
I think Roddick and Safin are the most frightening players.
In the case of Nalbandian you can attack his serve,but with Roddick and Safin ,when they play their best there´s nothing someone can do
lanceloter 3 years ago
Roddick can't even compare.
thereisnoel 3 years ago 4
yeah i'd say thats true about safin. when hes playing well, which unfortunately isnt that often, he can beat anybody.
musicgamer10 3 years ago
Roddick can´t even compare to Nalbandian.
Yeah,you´re right.There´s no comparison between an ex n1 and grand slam champion and Nalbandian.
lanceloter 3 years ago
If you are talking about at the moment. Roddick's results as of late have shown that. Nalbandian's results have also been poor, but like Safin, he has a chance to let his talent shine.
thereisnoel 3 years ago
Roddick isnt in the same league as nalbandian and safin. Im not talking about results, im talking about talent. Roddick is great but if all players were playing at their BEST it would rank nalbandian 1st, safin 2nd n roddick third. Roddick is a good player but if they were all playing their best he wouldnt stand a chance against these two. Talent and results are two very different things.
AceGuitarR7 3 years ago 4
the most dangerous players on tour... just need a lil more consistency and they up there with federer
Elohite 3 years ago
To me safin and nalbandian are the best players on the tour, even though safin isn't playing his best at the moment. I really hope that safin wil l be back in top 10 soon, cause safin, nalbandian and murray have the best game for me.
surimaribo13 3 years ago 2
This was definitely one of the best matches of 2006.
osalsyst 3 years ago 3
nalbandians prob the most talented player after fed...id say even more so than nadal.. for some reason he doesnt seem to be able to hold it together long enough..
AceGuitarR7 3 years ago 4
It's all mental.
teenDarin 3 years ago
safin dident win !?!?!? xD
hazer94 3 years ago
Cañas mejor que Nalbi CUAK!!
stgobaiano 4 years ago
safin all the way
azhool1 4 years ago
the point at 3.25 is just unbelievable from safin !!
htamak 4 years ago
a mi no me gusta Nalbandian, porque el es sobrado, se cree mucho el cuento de que el es mejor que los demás, para mi Cañas es mejor que Nalbandian.
madrilenho 4 years ago
Safin is my favorite but he is a great loser!
Serzhanonekz9 4 years ago
Safin and Nalbandian are more talented than Federer, Nadal and Djokovic. Fed, Nadal and Djo are more regular.
10leahpar 4 years ago 3
i wouldn't say so. When talking about talent we're mostly talking about technique wise. When u first seen Federer u knew he was already something special. Federer, Nalbandian and Safin talents are on the same line.
GyariSan 4 years ago
On pure talent alone Fed is still the greatest although Safin & Nalbandian are no doubt his closest rivals in that regard (very close indeed). As GyariSan said, Fed's natural technique is just too crisp in every department. Naturally, Fed's every shot barring his bachand is better than these guys.
CleckleysProof 4 years ago 2
why would he want tobe like canas. david has been 3 in the world and made it to the semis of every slam. canas has never been past a quarter final. david has had a better career than canas so why should he try to be lie someone who is less talented and does nothing but moonball and run down shots
scholarlyg 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Obviously Marat is the best! he was number 1. David wasn´t, and the ranking ATP Marat has the best place than David. David you´re a looser....you dissapoint me even I being argentinian, you must learn from Guillermo Cañas. shame on you!!!!!!
veronyka83 4 years ago
both of them have the potential to compete at the same level as federer, nadal, djokovic.. they just don't try that hard, look at nalbandian he has just won ATP Madrid 2007 beating the best 3 players :P
cwal99 4 years ago 2
david sos lo mas grande que hay te banco a muerte
junii0r22 4 years ago
Its too bad that these two players have not done more with their careers. They are truly great players.
kdorg79 4 years ago 3
two heroes ! amazing match
nicor23 5 years ago
C'mon David.. i want to see this celebration in the Davis Cup Final... un grande...
KlausSteiner 5 years ago