Added: 2 years ago
From: newsburghnews
Views: 400
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Both parties have FAILED the people and the People have failed themselves by voting for these lifer politicians. None of them should be allowed to serve without making significant changes in how gov't is run. There is No excuse that gov't doesn't serve it's people. Where the hell is our forced tax money going for. Most politicians are professionals and lawyers. Captialism feeds on the backs of the many who have less. it's no secret both parties are laughing at voters behind corporate doors.

  • @ticket2 You're just another dumb fuck that sings along with the choir. You've stated that "None of them should be allowed to serve without making significant changes in how gov't is run". Now do you have any suggestions on those really needed "significant changes" you SO proposed for? Or are you gonna blame everything on Illuminati, like every helpless and hopeless piece of shit, seems to do these days?

  • @Nowasta Your foul mouthed vocabulary proves you have NO answers yourself. Both parties HAVE FAILED the people of this nation. Neither political party has it's citizens best interest at heart. The party of "NO" the right has no real interest in changing anything just keep on with same old political rhetoric. While the left the party of "CHANGE" has no real direction for real change that would benefit us all. it's truly sad how people buy into either party. dare i say BULLSHIT.

  • @ticket2 It seems to be a bitter irony when you say that the left has no real direction towards change. I could say things about the right but I don't have enough space in Youtube to say it.

    Let's be clear on this. I am ambiguous towards either parties (the democrats or the republicans), but I hate people like you the most. People who just LOVE to bitch and moan about how the whole system is broken and it needs changing, YET they themselves cannot come up with even ONE suggestion to fix it.

  • @Nowasta Youtube is NOT the right forum for me to make numerous changes that you may or may not agree need to be done The fact is because both political parties have such a strangle hold on the political system but the first thing that needs to change is to have term limits! Too many politicians are in into it for far too long it soon turns from a commitment to public service too striving to be a career politican. Second the amount of money needed to run for political office only wealthy can run

  • @ticket2 First off, I agree that Youtube lacks the forum for an engaging debate to occur (Take Note Google). Since the main topic is about Obama the president, I'll have to correct you and say that presidents have term limits. If you want to clarify, please elaborate. If you care about the amount of money being spent, pls punch the fuckin lights out of our supreme court. I'll help you out on that. Corporations can spend as much as they want in campaigns now..Fuck you Scillia and the rest.

  • Please google:

    Lid blows off Obama's forgotten scandal

  • If the Stimulus act was so great and grand and necessary to restore the economy, then why have they only spent 1/3 of the money earmarked in the bill? I thought this was a crisis! It's because they are sitting on the money till the 2010 elections and will start to use it on populist measures in order to buy votes.

  • Just like Bush. Lying pigs. Some of us knew it was a bullshit con.  Some of us knew when you threatened that unemployment would hit 8% if you did not hand out billions to your criminal friends it was a con. Some of also know your lying that you "saved or created 2 million jobs". These fools really think they are helping... They only ones they help are their banker friends.

  • And in a few years, when inflation caused by his reckless spending is ruining peoples' life savings, this statement is going to get you politically hung.

    Give reality my regards when this happens.

  • @sonrouge what are these 'reckless spending' and how would you have stopped another depression from happening?

  • @Nowasta How about spending money we don't have (how the heck can you have money to spend when you're nursing a trillion dollar debt)?

    And look up Calvin Coolidge's administration for that answer.

  • @sonrouge So do you believe in the ending of tax cuts for people that earns above 250,000 a year by the end of 2010? That would decrease our deficit by at least 30%. So what's your answer to 'the ending of tax cuts for people that earn 250,000 or more per year that was granted by the Bush administration', because economists predict that would really help the American economy for now. Yes or No for ending the tax benefits for the wealthy? I await your reply.

  • @Nowasta I can't answer that question until dear leader makes it clear on whether or not he intends to scale back spending (highly doubt it). If he doesn't, ending the tax cuts isn't going to change squat.

  • @sonrouge You know until now you have kept evading my initial question about 'what reckless spending are you talking about?'. Health care? In the long run, it will tremendously help out small businesses. The bail out? If he hadn't done that, the whole world would have collapsed into another depression. Btw the Government has gotten most of the money back.

    He has spent a lot but I want you to point me towards the 'reckless' part. And it's pretty simple to agree or disagree about the tax cuts.

  • @Nowasta Actually, I pointed the reckless spending out already: the fact that we're spending money we don't have (NEWS FLASH: We are TRILLIONS in debt. How can we possibly have any money to spend?). It doesn't matter what dear leader spends the "money" on; our creditors aren't going to give a damn when they come to collect payment.

  • @Nowasta As for your other comments about helping small businesses and the bailout saving the world from another depression...ROTFLMAO!

    Buddy, you are in for one hell of a wake-up call.

  • @sonrouge As for ending the tax cuts, assuming dear leader was going to put every cent of the extra money to paying off our debt and cut back spending on top of it, then yes, I would support them. But I doubt that's the plan.

    Oh, and have you looked up Calvin Coolidge's years in office like I told you?

  • @sonrouge Give me a rundown about this 'wake-up call' you talk about. Give me a precise conclusion about how Obama has destroyed the whole nation. Btw, the economic crisis, the health care crisis and everything else he has done was there before he was elected president. I want to know how McCain would have handled the situation that would be drastically better than Obama's Plan; Or are you just another 'say no to everything Obama says even if it means destroying yourself' people?

  • Comment removed

  • @Nowasta First off, Dear leader hasn't destroyed the nation; the policies he supports, which have been going on since the first Great Depression, are destroying the nation. Second, I doubt McCain would've done any better (FYI, I'm Apolitical). Third, have you read up on Calvin Coolidge's time in office?

    As for the wake-up call, look up life in Germany during the twenties and thirties.

  • @sonrouge So you're implying Obama is Hitler reincarnate? If you've ever looked at the history of other countries, you'll definitely agree that - even with this so-called 'Obamacare' and other shit the right wing tries to put on Obama - U.S is far (way too far) from being a socialist country. There's just no fuckin way. If you want facts, just look at the true socialist countries.

    Btw, you only criticize, but never have a true opinion of yourself; why?

  • @Nowasta No, I'm simply saying his policies, from a rational view of the facts, fall under fascism.

    By the way, your foul language isn't winning you any points, so I suggest you refrain from it.

    And what do you mean, a true opinion of myself?

  • @sonrouge First off, since it seems to bother you so much, I'd like to apologize for my language.

    Next, I just cannot accept that Obama is a fascist or a Nazi. Presidents before him have more radical decision than Obama ever will; be it a so called 'socialist' or a 'nazi' plot, his predecessors have done more.

    If you wanna criticize Obama, criticize him for this; he totally dropped his balls when it came to keeping his campaign promises.

  • @Nowasta For the last time, I'm not saying Obama is a fascist or some muslim sleeper. I'm saying his policies fall under the definition of fascism.

  • @sonrouge Cont: when a nation was knee-deep in 2 wars, a looming economic depression and the distrust of the whole world; a man rose up and said 'here's a change we can believe in' and 'yes we can'. If you want to criticize Obama, criticize him for saying his dream but not living up to it; stop saying he's some kind of a secret muslim of hitler reincarnate.

    For my last question, I was actually asking, what's your own opinion? since republicans seem to say no to anything without any objectivity

  • @Nowasta My own opinion is that Obama is, like the politicians before him, taking us down the path to economic crisis. He's spent in two years more than Bush spent in eight, increased government power on a level not seen since FDR, and he's ignoring signs that his goals are unsustainable. If he were a Republican, I'd be going after him just as much.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more