Belive it or not Free energy is real,But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,Join the energy revolution!
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the revolution!
The reason we don't see these leaning trike produced is that it is very difficult to incorporate a 'correcting' mechanism into the steering. A bicycle, while being extremely simple, has that correcting ability.
While riding a Magnet,or any other leaning trike, the rider would have to manually correct the steering continuously. It would get very tiring after a short while.
Are you referring to self centering of the steering? If so, then you are in error. With wheels, the natural tendency is to point in the direction of least resistance and so roll most easily and so will "auto-correct". Lean correction is a function of having matched springs and/or a laterally balanced chassis. The real issue is whether you can force the lean or if the roll center above the CG as in a motorcycle.
As you know in a two wheeler or a leaning trike, the lean angle has to correspond to the steering direction in some shape or form. Otherwise you will have to correct your steering with every slight lean of the trike, because there is no self correction of the steering by through leaning.
In a Bicycle, although very simple, this self correction exists. that's why you can let of the handle bars and steer by leaning. Do you see my point?
Only in 2wheelers is the lean angle due to the geometry of the wheels themselves. Steering angle and the rolling path of a wheel play major roles in this. The rear wheel having more to do with lean than the front.
For any more than 2 wheels, it's a matter of centrifugal force. The suspension's lateral balance recenters for you as in a car. I've been working on the issue for years to find a solution for cars with complex mechanisms so I do study the dynamics of 2wheelers.
Mine is for a vehicle with four or more wheels and is reliant on Centrifugal force. Because of this I'm not the most confident in my solution as yet. It can easily be subverted with only modest changes in the CG. It'll work for a sports car, where I can fix both ends of the car, but I'm trying to make it work for a truck or SUV. If that, then the final solution there will work on anything.
If you don't/can't see the point of this, check your pulse...you may just be dead!
If you don't grin like a loon just from looking at it, even though it's only a rendition, I suggest you take up knitting or crochet, and leave this sort of thing to those of us with some imagination and sense of fun ;o)
I think I'd want it if the roads around here weren't completely shot full of potholes. There's no way you could get a decent suspension system working well without the bottom scraping the pavement.
Very cool, but here in Texas it would never be street legal, too many rednecks would run over you driving 50+ mph to get 1000 feet from where they are.
Not so. Bikes are about as stable as you get for high speed turns but the three-wheel platform presents a HUGE gyroscopic challenge. It looks like Aprilia is aware of that though and they DO make awesome motorcycles. The main advantage I can see for a three-wheeler is never having to worry about dropping it.
Bikes are about as unstable as you can get except a unicycle of course, motorcycle racers crash both highside and lowside with out any contact. A triagular base is inherantly stable and since the rider is inline with the tilting pivot point it should be very difficult to highside and impossible to low side. I think dynamically you could gain the lean vectored forces for traction and push the driver into not off of he seat just like a bike. You could also gain the platform stability of a car.
The rotating mass of a wheel acts like a big gyrscope. Applying a moment to a rotating mass results in a moment, orthogonal to both, towards the positive axis of the applied moment. Motorcycles take advantage of this, cars (except F-1) do not have to worry about this phenomenon. This is why 3 wheel ATVs were outlawed.
High side and low side crashes are due to traction, not stability.
I was a stable element(Gyroscope) Operator/Technician aboard a battleship. I think I understand the principals of angular momentum and gyroscopic precession. It simply resists a change in direction based upon its mass, speed and the location of that mass relative to its diamater @90deg. You could easily make two smaller lighter wheels with less angular momentum than many motorcycles operating today. Giving motorcycles stability in a straight line and resists their ability to change directon.
While your qualifications are impressive, I have qualifications too (a master's in ME, working on my doctorate). In the end, I don't care about winning this argument. Neither of us work for Aprilia and it's their opinion that matters.
No offence meant I just disagreed with your statements. There is a video on youtube for a three wheeled reverse trike called a brudeli that you might enjoy.
Good luck on your doctorates degree in Mechanical Engineering as well, where are you attending if I might ask?
I'll look up the 'brudeli'. If you enjoy electric vehicles/trikes, I built an electric vehicle using a tadpole (reverse trike) platform. I have a series of EV videos on YouTube if you're curious.
I am at the University of Texas at Austin and am roughly 9 months away from graduation.
I think the crux of our misunderstanding comes from different difinitions of stabilty. I was thinking about stability from a system dynamics point of view because that's what I know.
Thanks a lot I will look up your videos as I am interested in EV trikes, I was and partially still am considering building a reverse trike. I was going to build a LiFePo4 powered Bug-e and upgrade it for starters with A PMG 132 motor. Finances are too tight for now I have a house to sell to aquire the capitol. In the interim I bought a Yamaha XT250 Dualsport 80mpg and fun to drive, but still dream of creating a track day type of leaning Reverse trike. Tired of ridiculous gas prices as well.
This had nothing what so ever to do with why three wheelers were taken of the market? They were an inherantly unstable platform due to the fact that during a right hand turn the forward momentum forces the unstable platform over where it has no support on the out side left hand side? With two wide spaced wheels in front the stability is placed correctly for the forces involved.
If the vehicle tilts this further enhances stability in a corner!
"High side and low side crashes are due to traction, not stability."
Not true while both high side and lowside crashes involve loss or sudden gain of traction its the instability inherant in a motorcycle that causes the crash. Note that a car that loses traction does not slide under itself like a bike does and usually does not flip over its center of gravity sideways unless it has a narrow platform and high cg (closer to a bike). The fact that a bike leans allows the driver to counter this?
There may be some similarities to the Nike One concept but they are fundamentally different in so many ways that this is not a copy and tilting three wheelers have been around for almost a hundred years is Nike one a copy of one of them? I like this one and its realistically feasable. Neat design!
This has been flagged as spam show
Belive it or not Free energy is real,But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
fittingciobb 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,Join the energy revolution!
Sandrago2345 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real but the coverup is strong, if you are interested in a REAL free energy machine then
just search for the LT MAGNET MOTOR in the youtube video search , it is probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
cloudburstlenepmhq 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the revolution!
transfusablepng 1 year ago
Sweet! A convenient carry handle! LOL.
Stealthsoldier20 1 year ago
what if you crash???
there go your balls!
Mrfollowill 1 year ago
@Mrfollowill in the event of a crash I suppose you may see them one last time as they are exiting your mouth.
SykoEsquire 10 months ago
Wow, thats a really good idea, maybe a head first design would work as well
shorterthanu52 1 year ago
The reason we don't see these leaning trike produced is that it is very difficult to incorporate a 'correcting' mechanism into the steering. A bicycle, while being extremely simple, has that correcting ability.
While riding a Magnet,or any other leaning trike, the rider would have to manually correct the steering continuously. It would get very tiring after a short while.
disndat11 2 years ago
Are you referring to self centering of the steering? If so, then you are in error. With wheels, the natural tendency is to point in the direction of least resistance and so roll most easily and so will "auto-correct". Lean correction is a function of having matched springs and/or a laterally balanced chassis. The real issue is whether you can force the lean or if the roll center above the CG as in a motorcycle.
DocWolph 2 years ago
No!
As you know in a two wheeler or a leaning trike, the lean angle has to correspond to the steering direction in some shape or form. Otherwise you will have to correct your steering with every slight lean of the trike, because there is no self correction of the steering by through leaning.
In a Bicycle, although very simple, this self correction exists. that's why you can let of the handle bars and steer by leaning. Do you see my point?
disndat11 2 years ago
Only in 2wheelers is the lean angle due to the geometry of the wheels themselves. Steering angle and the rolling path of a wheel play major roles in this. The rear wheel having more to do with lean than the front.
For any more than 2 wheels, it's a matter of centrifugal force. The suspension's lateral balance recenters for you as in a car. I've been working on the issue for years to find a solution for cars with complex mechanisms so I do study the dynamics of 2wheelers.
DocWolph 2 years ago
So have you found a solution?
I've been working on a leaning trike Bicycle for the past 6 months. It works, except the problem I pointed out in my previous post.
disndat11 2 years ago
Mine is for a vehicle with four or more wheels and is reliant on Centrifugal force. Because of this I'm not the most confident in my solution as yet. It can easily be subverted with only modest changes in the CG. It'll work for a sports car, where I can fix both ends of the car, but I'm trying to make it work for a truck or SUV. If that, then the final solution there will work on anything.
DocWolph 2 years ago
Comment removed
iq201 1 year ago
true, but the performace gained by having the motors in the wheels(unsprung weight) would be a nice advantage.
999benhonda 1 year ago
how would it turn sharp corners??
DimsimMaster 2 years ago 2
I dont see any point to this design. What is the Royal College of the Arts doing handing out design jobs if this is the result??!
shagster1970 2 years ago
If you don't/can't see the point of this, check your pulse...you may just be dead!
If you don't grin like a loon just from looking at it, even though it's only a rendition, I suggest you take up knitting or crochet, and leave this sort of thing to those of us with some imagination and sense of fun ;o)
No offense.
Docv400 2 years ago
I dont get it.
I thought this was a magnet...
Nice Trike though :)
OrionSamson 2 years ago
wow
cocodrilll 2 years ago
I think I'd want it if the roads around here weren't completely shot full of potholes. There's no way you could get a decent suspension system working well without the bottom scraping the pavement.
TNSFE 2 years ago
WANT!
jlan12 3 years ago
Go Heikki!
WBD86 3 years ago
Looks like a siple thing :D ill make 5 wheels and new look... will it be something new??? no....
FruityLoopsas 3 years ago
looks like the nike car on gt4
mudaphucker 3 years ago
Beautiful concept.
But I think I would shit my self if I was sitting so closte to the ground at highway speeds
TheDirtNinja 3 years ago 2
like star wars :D
balagecrf 3 years ago
Magnetism is the future of movement
MRSBA7 3 years ago
i will buy me one, when i have earn enough money and when this come to the markt
untersuchung 3 years ago
perfect design
tobeaswallow 3 years ago
Very cool, but here in Texas it would never be street legal, too many rednecks would run over you driving 50+ mph to get 1000 feet from where they are.
mkattdc 3 years ago
nice video
queeenfish 3 years ago
Looks cool... But why would this be better than a normal bike?
Plutoniumwonkel 3 years ago
much more stable in high spead turns
paperkarma 3 years ago
Not so. Bikes are about as stable as you get for high speed turns but the three-wheel platform presents a HUGE gyroscopic challenge. It looks like Aprilia is aware of that though and they DO make awesome motorcycles. The main advantage I can see for a three-wheeler is never having to worry about dropping it.
mshimek 3 years ago
Bikes are about as unstable as you can get except a unicycle of course, motorcycle racers crash both highside and lowside with out any contact. A triagular base is inherantly stable and since the rider is inline with the tilting pivot point it should be very difficult to highside and impossible to low side. I think dynamically you could gain the lean vectored forces for traction and push the driver into not off of he seat just like a bike. You could also gain the platform stability of a car.
Jamesbowman777 3 years ago
The rotating mass of a wheel acts like a big gyrscope. Applying a moment to a rotating mass results in a moment, orthogonal to both, towards the positive axis of the applied moment. Motorcycles take advantage of this, cars (except F-1) do not have to worry about this phenomenon. This is why 3 wheel ATVs were outlawed.
High side and low side crashes are due to traction, not stability.
mshimek 3 years ago
I was a stable element(Gyroscope) Operator/Technician aboard a battleship. I think I understand the principals of angular momentum and gyroscopic precession. It simply resists a change in direction based upon its mass, speed and the location of that mass relative to its diamater @90deg. You could easily make two smaller lighter wheels with less angular momentum than many motorcycles operating today. Giving motorcycles stability in a straight line and resists their ability to change directon.
bowmanfamilyoffaith 3 years ago
While your qualifications are impressive, I have qualifications too (a master's in ME, working on my doctorate). In the end, I don't care about winning this argument. Neither of us work for Aprilia and it's their opinion that matters.
mshimek 3 years ago
No offence meant I just disagreed with your statements. There is a video on youtube for a three wheeled reverse trike called a brudeli that you might enjoy.
Good luck on your doctorates degree in Mechanical Engineering as well, where are you attending if I might ask?
Jamesbowman777 3 years ago
I'll look up the 'brudeli'. If you enjoy electric vehicles/trikes, I built an electric vehicle using a tadpole (reverse trike) platform. I have a series of EV videos on YouTube if you're curious.
I am at the University of Texas at Austin and am roughly 9 months away from graduation.
I think the crux of our misunderstanding comes from different difinitions of stabilty. I was thinking about stability from a system dynamics point of view because that's what I know.
mshimek 3 years ago
Thanks a lot I will look up your videos as I am interested in EV trikes, I was and partially still am considering building a reverse trike. I was going to build a LiFePo4 powered Bug-e and upgrade it for starters with A PMG 132 motor. Finances are too tight for now I have a house to sell to aquire the capitol. In the interim I bought a Yamaha XT250 Dualsport 80mpg and fun to drive, but still dream of creating a track day type of leaning Reverse trike. Tired of ridiculous gas prices as well.
Jamesbowman777 3 years ago
"This is why 3 wheel ATVs were outlawed."
This had nothing what so ever to do with why three wheelers were taken of the market? They were an inherantly unstable platform due to the fact that during a right hand turn the forward momentum forces the unstable platform over where it has no support on the out side left hand side? With two wide spaced wheels in front the stability is placed correctly for the forces involved.
If the vehicle tilts this further enhances stability in a corner!
Jamesbowman777 3 years ago
"High side and low side crashes are due to traction, not stability."
Not true while both high side and lowside crashes involve loss or sudden gain of traction its the instability inherant in a motorcycle that causes the crash. Note that a car that loses traction does not slide under itself like a bike does and usually does not flip over its center of gravity sideways unless it has a narrow platform and high cg (closer to a bike). The fact that a bike leans allows the driver to counter this?
Jamesbowman777 3 years ago
that shit looks badass
BIZRZKYKK 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
my back hurts just looking at it. no thanks
TheJadeEmporer 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow...
If Aprilia make it then it will be the most comfortable, stunning, fun vehicle ever...
Shame it will need servicing every 3 minutes, like most italian crap...
Shouldnt we be a bit more environmental and vote with our wallets by avoiding companies that make things that are designed to break...
Even if they are amazing to ride and look at...
I've had 3 aprilias and I had to treat them like faberge eggs...
waterboost 3 years ago
Aprilia is no crap! Aprilia has 10000 km serviceintervals. all japanese has 6000 km! Aprilia is the 2nd biggest europe bikebulder!
And Aprilia build simply the best bikes in the world!
starbuckracing 3 years ago 2
Im being a bit more enviromental by riding aprilia RS125 :) little 2stroke. heating up the planet geting a better summer.
ryan46little 3 years ago
Nize, but i still miss the sound^^
54spiritedwill54 3 years ago
Cool.. Make it work and I'll buy one.
dreiseratops 4 years ago
how do you do sharp corners on those
bintoooi 4 years ago
I don't think you do....
vnonjuice 4 years ago
...plus, on an accident, you'll be splitted easily in two by the way you are sitted..
samoht1977 4 years ago
Luddite..
Hangdog98 4 years ago
Nice work very neat design.
johnet58 4 years ago
HEIKKI NAULAPAA IS A GENIUS.
NR49165 4 years ago
There may be some similarities to the Nike One concept but they are fundamentally different in so many ways that this is not a copy and tilting three wheelers have been around for almost a hundred years is Nike one a copy of one of them? I like this one and its realistically feasable. Neat design!
Jamesbowman777 4 years ago
please..
i really want known more how that system function....
just send the all about that information to me...
ebean_studio
ebeanhebat 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
<b>
Enter XXXodour.com_ to Play Full Length XXX Videos 4 FREE
</b>
chanshihacumi 4 years ago
3greenwheels blogspot com
justbluemail 4 years ago
Rip off of the Nike car..
dexter12322222222222 4 years ago
Nice, does look a bit like the Nike car though. And the Nike car was designed prior to 2004, as Gran Turismo 4 was released in 2004 :].
RomeoEskobar 4 years ago
is a bad copy of the NIKE CAR.
skulhell 4 years ago
The Magnet was done in 2004, the nike car in 2007.
Learn how to read a calendar.
bob18469 4 years ago
i have seen that nike car in 2004,,,
dexter12322222222222 4 years ago
If you think this is cool, check out "Another Mothership"
jjdiggs 4 years ago
Sexy, but i miss the ride -- Ooops, it doesn't exist!
jjdiggs 4 years ago
Nize, but i still miss the sound^^ ooops, its electric!(?)
DaMitchi 4 years ago