The reason this works is that the positive pole is countering the negative pole which aligns more as magnetic current in the triangle, so the pos becomes an overlayed triangle /intercepting one. It's average particle is slower and heavier, less energetic. Compare this star of david shape I just described with the matrix7 which I have described in a particle physics video on my channel. I have also explained Levitation/ antigrav of the coral castle stone levitation and ufo techs.
@drawmaster77 actually it is, it's repelling gravity even though it would not be efficient enough by itself to lift a craft, it does prove a vital principle of particle mechanics that would otherwise not take place. Just try this using a hexagon or a square and see how well that works.
@mikefromspace dude its not antigravity. It does not modify force of gravity. All it does is counters it with an equal or greater force of ionized air or whatever that is similar to a rocket. Its different concept. Antigravity devices have not yet been invented simply because we don't know what 'gravity' actually is.
@drawmaster77 If in fact this can work in a vacuum, would you accept that as anti-gravity?
either way, I see that ions exist with or without air. I've explained the physics of this on my channel along with Edward Leedskalnin's levitation device used to move stones 60k lbs with a little 2 ton chainhoist. All anti-gravity is a form of mass displacement by heavy positive ions (no atmosphere needed, since space abhors a vacuum).
@jjaj6 What is your point ?, My point will be that the aircraft you are referring to has nothing to do with this aircraft, As a matter of fact the only thing that they do have in common is the question on whether they exist or not.
Free energy has been here all along ,But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Find the real deal, a free energy device at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
Free energy is finaly here!But the coverup is very strong,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
This device works through AIR DISPLACMENT. That's not anti-gravity,but since it falls into "anti-gravity like properties" it is labeled as an anti-gravity device. Put that piece of junk into a complete vacuum and the "anti-gravity" ceases to work. In plian and simple language it is confined to the realms of atmosphereic flight only.
Has anyone tried putting a lifter in in an air tight container, putting the container on a scale, and turning the lifter on? If the lifter floats entirely due to thrust from the air being blown downward, then all it would do is blow air around inside the container, with no effect on the weight of the container. If it is influencing gravity, then it should have some effect on the overall weight of the container.
@jlac47 Yeah, I thought about this test too. There is so much controversy about the whole (vaccume chamber) thing...some saying it doesnt work at all...other sources claiming it does. Testing as U have stated, would be a good, cheap way to prove or disprove any antigrav effects. It will have to be scales sensative enough to show the lifter's weight, among the much greater weight of the airtight container.
@frankensteinmoneymac The airtight container actually wouldn't need to be very heavy for this. Something as simple as a good ziplock bag is airtight enough for the test, since it isn't testing if these work in a vacuum. The only reason to put it in something airtight is to provide a closed system that can be put on a scale. The scale would still have to be sensitive enough to notice changes in the weight of the lifter, but the container can be as simple as a plastic bag.
@jlac47 Good point actually! Maybe I should try it...I've made lifters before...they are pretty simple. I've got a HV power supply (which is the only difficult part....the rest is basically thin wire/balsa wood/tinfoil)....I would have to get a sensitive scale though...
Also If it were an electronic scale (likely it would be) I'd have to make sure that no EM interference from the HV would screw up the results....all in all, though a pretty simple test. Thanks! I like the zip-lock bag Idea!
I began building my first tonight. I don't have any bulser wood so I'm just using some straws instead, their lighter and do the same job. I don't know how to get the 240 volt wall socket outlet to 25kilovolts however. Some help in that would be great. The wire is also something idk about. I'm using a copper wire that I got out of an old extension cord with the plastic stripped away. It totals at 2 grams so it's not increadably heavy but will it work?
Can you explain in a short summary what is causing the negation of gravity? is it a field generated by the foil or the power supply?? of is it vibrational as in sound based?
Gravity is not being negated but generated in a upward facing direction.
This is an "electro-gravitic" generator. It generates an artifical gravity well due to the very high voltage (30,000 volts) charging the negatively charged foil and the tiny positively charged wire suspended above the foil.
The dispropotional surface area ratios between the foil and wire creates an electrogravitic "warp" and generates the gravity well.
T. Townsend Brown discovered this phenom. LaViolette explains it.
Because the B2 stealth bomber is triangular you believe it uses this technology lol get a grip on reality man have you actually seen the video of a B2 crashing if the B2 really did use this tech i guarantee not a single living organism outside of the circle would know the B2 even existed.
The triangular shape is not the "proof". The evidence that the B2 uses electrogravitics comes from the engineers who BUILT THE B2 in an article published in "Aviation Weekly" shortly after the B2 was made public.
Read LaViolette's "Antigravity Propulsion" for details on this.
@keyinsight well put! Nice to see U put a jack ass, who does not know anything in his place...One point of interest, from what I have read, the B2 uses the asymetric capacitor design horizontaly, rather than verticly. Of course "lifter" tech works whichever way U point it, so its likely that on the B2, it is either a silent propulsion option for stealth(like one of those silent Russian subs), ot I have even heard rumors of how it might cut its radar signiture!
@MirageScience NO the military has not said anything about this. The B2 ist just kept in air like every other plane actually is. By lift from underpressure over the wings. The only fools are people like you who believe this half science bullshit.
@badass6996 - Here's a good Vasimir plasma engine (space shuttle replacement candidate) lifter video: v=lNda58_Vj80 Many scientists are claiming that earth lift-off can be accomplished with just a little more work... Moray Kin: A rotating plasma produces a gravity-vector. Orient the vector
away from the Earth's surface and you have levitation, or degravitation.
thats awesome dude. 1 question. I cant afford a power supply of 20-30k. I checked on ebay and they're like a couple grand! I have 2, 15kv NST's from my tesla coil. Can I use those depending on the weight of the lifter or does it no shit have to be around the 20-30kv range?
I got a simple 30kv generator from Information Unlimited. Search for their site on Google. It cost less than $150 ... Look under the "Antigravity" section.
wow, i totally forgot about that sight. I got my first coil from there, the mini one that fits in your hand but hits you like a cattle prod. lol. Thanx for the info man, keep on keeping on!
@kjbaran Yeah, I got mine from Ebay, for around 50 bucks! ....Not sure what U were typing into the search engine, but it must have been the wrong thing! Also U can modify an older style computer monitor, or TV to give U the juice (google the instructions, they are easy to find) which is the cheapest way (just make sure U know what u r doing, HV is dangerous!) PS a tesla coil might not work, cause it is AC, rather than DC
I have done deeper research into this and I will say: it depends on the vaccum.
It turns out that vacuum intensity plays a big role. In a "hard" vacuum - like in space - this tech operates. In less complete vacuums this tech does not operate because the dielectric created by pressurized air collapses, reducing impedance & canceling the effect. In a "hard" vacuum the effect reestablishes itself due to zero ionized air traveling to the opposite pole.
The air between the wire and foil should be thought of as part of the lifter circuit. Imagine it as 3 layers. The wire then the air gap then the foil. Its well known now that when all three layers are encased the lifter still works well in a vacuum. Fascinating stuff and nice build. I got a low voltage one to kinda work not so well though using a circuit I ripped out of a one of them 6 volt emergency fluorescent lights. Great tinkering n thanks for sharing ;-)
THATS NOT aNTI GRAVITY the high voltage aclerates the air particles on the bottom and creates thrust not anti gravity . try 2 put it into a vacoom chamber it wont work
@keyinsight You may very well be right about lifters...I myself am undecided on the exact propulsion they employ....however I have to point out a slight misconception you have about airfoils. It is not that the air pushes against anything. If an airfoil caried its own air supply it'd work in a vacuum! It is Newton's reaction for every action. It is the same reason a rocket flies in a vacuum. It is not "pushing" against anything.....it is backwards action, which causes a forward reaction.
good job yourself, lifters have always been interesting to me,it would be awesome if this works in a vaccuum as well! then that will get rid of the people who say thats what it is. i feel with the right equipment you could probably make some of the electrostatic aircraft tesla made. there was also a MIT guy would was able to make a high voltage that could lift alot of heavy weight!
I highly recommend Paul LaViollette's "Antigravity Propulsion".
LaViolette's book is a text book detailing "back-engineering level" detail of SEVERAL electrogravitic, electrostatic, and free energy tech developed from the electrogravitic phenomena.
LaViolette has developed a physics theory called "Sub-Quantum Kinetics" that predicts and explains these phenomena and MUCH more. This book includes a crash course in Sub-Quantum physics.
His book "Subquantum Kinetics" goes into full detail.
This is NOT anti-gravity
1011basic 1 day ago
The reason this works is that the positive pole is countering the negative pole which aligns more as magnetic current in the triangle, so the pos becomes an overlayed triangle /intercepting one. It's average particle is slower and heavier, less energetic. Compare this star of david shape I just described with the matrix7 which I have described in a particle physics video on my channel. I have also explained Levitation/ antigrav of the coral castle stone levitation and ufo techs.
mikefromspace 2 days ago
I LOLED
GrooveChimpChannel 1 week ago
DOES ANYONE WATCH MYTHBUSTERS?
MYTH BUSTED!!!!
EpicSuccuss 1 month ago
@EpicSuccuss what was their point?
mikefromspace 2 days ago
better do it with circle aluminium cause if you will do that it won't lose the balance
AlexTsp2494 1 month ago
this is not antigravity.... get your facts straight
drawmaster77 1 month ago
@drawmaster77 actually it is, it's repelling gravity even though it would not be efficient enough by itself to lift a craft, it does prove a vital principle of particle mechanics that would otherwise not take place. Just try this using a hexagon or a square and see how well that works.
mikefromspace 2 days ago
@mikefromspace dude its not antigravity. It does not modify force of gravity. All it does is counters it with an equal or greater force of ionized air or whatever that is similar to a rocket. Its different concept. Antigravity devices have not yet been invented simply because we don't know what 'gravity' actually is.
drawmaster77 2 days ago
@drawmaster77 If in fact this can work in a vacuum, would you accept that as anti-gravity?
either way, I see that ions exist with or without air. I've explained the physics of this on my channel along with Edward Leedskalnin's levitation device used to move stones 60k lbs with a little 2 ton chainhoist. All anti-gravity is a form of mass displacement by heavy positive ions (no atmosphere needed, since space abhors a vacuum).
mikefromspace 2 days ago
@jjaj6 What is your point ?, My point will be that the aircraft you are referring to has nothing to do with this aircraft, As a matter of fact the only thing that they do have in common is the question on whether they exist or not.
badass6996 7 months ago
its only ionizing the air around it!!! not creaing an antigravitaional affect.
501alistair 8 months ago
its NOT anti gravity it uses electromagnetism
1littlelee 11 months ago
awesome
How exciting for you
xtreemflame 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy has been here all along ,But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Find the real deal, a free energy device at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
ivylsp 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy is finaly here!But the coverup is very strong,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
dharmastipulate 1 year ago
So these aren't very common for public use at the moment because they require so much power?
StarFoxAutobot 1 year ago
YESS Grant Imahara!!
kevinbollers2 1 year ago
i saw the strngs!!!! attached there fishing lines!!! spoof!
dragonmaster786 1 year ago
This would be an electrostatic wind thruster, not antigravity. (ion thruster)
mmaaxx1198 1 year ago
This device works through AIR DISPLACMENT. That's not anti-gravity,but since it falls into "anti-gravity like properties" it is labeled as an anti-gravity device. Put that piece of junk into a complete vacuum and the "anti-gravity" ceases to work. In plian and simple language it is confined to the realms of atmosphereic flight only.
agrogod 1 year ago
Has anyone tried putting a lifter in in an air tight container, putting the container on a scale, and turning the lifter on? If the lifter floats entirely due to thrust from the air being blown downward, then all it would do is blow air around inside the container, with no effect on the weight of the container. If it is influencing gravity, then it should have some effect on the overall weight of the container.
jlac47 1 year ago
@jlac47 Yeah, I thought about this test too. There is so much controversy about the whole (vaccume chamber) thing...some saying it doesnt work at all...other sources claiming it does. Testing as U have stated, would be a good, cheap way to prove or disprove any antigrav effects. It will have to be scales sensative enough to show the lifter's weight, among the much greater weight of the airtight container.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac The airtight container actually wouldn't need to be very heavy for this. Something as simple as a good ziplock bag is airtight enough for the test, since it isn't testing if these work in a vacuum. The only reason to put it in something airtight is to provide a closed system that can be put on a scale. The scale would still have to be sensitive enough to notice changes in the weight of the lifter, but the container can be as simple as a plastic bag.
jlac47 1 year ago
@jlac47 Good point actually! Maybe I should try it...I've made lifters before...they are pretty simple. I've got a HV power supply (which is the only difficult part....the rest is basically thin wire/balsa wood/tinfoil)....I would have to get a sensitive scale though...
Also If it were an electronic scale (likely it would be) I'd have to make sure that no EM interference from the HV would screw up the results....all in all, though a pretty simple test. Thanks! I like the zip-lock bag Idea!
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
great job Chris
Spelec2001 1 year ago
I began building my first tonight. I don't have any bulser wood so I'm just using some straws instead, their lighter and do the same job. I don't know how to get the 240 volt wall socket outlet to 25kilovolts however. Some help in that would be great. The wire is also something idk about. I'm using a copper wire that I got out of an old extension cord with the plastic stripped away. It totals at 2 grams so it's not increadably heavy but will it work?
eacao 2 years ago
could you make a tutorial on how to build one of these?
anthonysaurus656 2 years ago
I have intended to create a tutorial but time has not yet permitted.
However... you can purchase the kit I used to build mine from Information Unlimited. Do a search for it. The kit has all the info you need.
Aeonika 2 years ago
Can you explain in a short summary what is causing the negation of gravity? is it a field generated by the foil or the power supply?? of is it vibrational as in sound based?
Banchoot 2 years ago
Gravity is not being negated but generated in a upward facing direction.
This is an "electro-gravitic" generator. It generates an artifical gravity well due to the very high voltage (30,000 volts) charging the negatively charged foil and the tiny positively charged wire suspended above the foil.
The dispropotional surface area ratios between the foil and wire creates an electrogravitic "warp" and generates the gravity well.
T. Townsend Brown discovered this phenom. LaViolette explains it.
Aeonika 2 years ago
@Aeonika it does not great artificial gravity. It stops working without air, because this thing just uses thrust.
djteac 1 year ago
@djteac Haven't heard that it was using air, who proves that? I don't seem to hear the foil making any noise.
mikefromspace 2 days ago
Because the B2 stealth bomber is triangular you believe it uses this technology lol get a grip on reality man have you actually seen the video of a B2 crashing if the B2 really did use this tech i guarantee not a single living organism outside of the circle would know the B2 even existed.
By the way good job on your build...
badass6996 2 years ago
The triangular shape is not the "proof". The evidence that the B2 uses electrogravitics comes from the engineers who BUILT THE B2 in an article published in "Aviation Weekly" shortly after the B2 was made public.
Read LaViolette's "Antigravity Propulsion" for details on this.
keyinsight 2 years ago
@keyinsight well put! Nice to see U put a jack ass, who does not know anything in his place...One point of interest, from what I have read, the B2 uses the asymetric capacitor design horizontaly, rather than verticly. Of course "lifter" tech works whichever way U point it, so its likely that on the B2, it is either a silent propulsion option for stealth(like one of those silent Russian subs), ot I have even heard rumors of how it might cut its radar signiture!
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@badass6996 the military have said themselves that this is used on the front end the the b2 bombers wings
RESEARCH FOOL
MirageScience 1 year ago
@MirageScience NO the military has not said anything about this. The B2 ist just kept in air like every other plane actually is. By lift from underpressure over the wings. The only fools are people like you who believe this half science bullshit.
djteac 1 year ago
@badass6996 - Here's a good Vasimir plasma engine (space shuttle replacement candidate) lifter video: v=lNda58_Vj80 Many scientists are claiming that earth lift-off can be accomplished with just a little more work... Moray Kin: A rotating plasma produces a gravity-vector. Orient the vector
away from the Earth's surface and you have levitation, or degravitation.
saintveil 1 year ago
@badass6996 TR3B
jjaj6 7 months ago
thats awesome dude. 1 question. I cant afford a power supply of 20-30k. I checked on ebay and they're like a couple grand! I have 2, 15kv NST's from my tesla coil. Can I use those depending on the weight of the lifter or does it no shit have to be around the 20-30kv range?
kjbaran 2 years ago
I got a simple 30kv generator from Information Unlimited. Search for their site on Google. It cost less than $150 ... Look under the "Antigravity" section.
keyinsight 2 years ago
wow, i totally forgot about that sight. I got my first coil from there, the mini one that fits in your hand but hits you like a cattle prod. lol. Thanx for the info man, keep on keeping on!
kjbaran 2 years ago
@kjbaran Yeah, I got mine from Ebay, for around 50 bucks! ....Not sure what U were typing into the search engine, but it must have been the wrong thing! Also U can modify an older style computer monitor, or TV to give U the juice (google the instructions, they are easy to find) which is the cheapest way (just make sure U know what u r doing, HV is dangerous!) PS a tesla coil might not work, cause it is AC, rather than DC
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
I have done deeper research into this and I will say: it depends on the vaccum.
It turns out that vacuum intensity plays a big role. In a "hard" vacuum - like in space - this tech operates. In less complete vacuums this tech does not operate because the dielectric created by pressurized air collapses, reducing impedance & canceling the effect. In a "hard" vacuum the effect reestablishes itself due to zero ionized air traveling to the opposite pole.
Read "Antigravity Propulsion" by LaViolette.
keyinsight 2 years ago
The air between the wire and foil should be thought of as part of the lifter circuit. Imagine it as 3 layers. The wire then the air gap then the foil. Its well known now that when all three layers are encased the lifter still works well in a vacuum. Fascinating stuff and nice build. I got a low voltage one to kinda work not so well though using a circuit I ripped out of a one of them 6 volt emergency fluorescent lights. Great tinkering n thanks for sharing ;-)
ZincFold 2 years ago
THATS NOT aNTI GRAVITY the high voltage aclerates the air particles on the bottom and creates thrust not anti gravity . try 2 put it into a vacoom chamber it wont work
airsoftmaster232 2 years ago
Have you built one?
The amount of air flow coming out the bottom of the craft is very small - not enough to lift it.
Also, the 3 sides are totally vertical - I am not aware of any airfoil/wing with zero horizontal components - what is the air pushing against?
I believe the air flow is a side effect of the electrogravitic thrust, not the cause of thrust.
Search YouTube for several videos demonstrating electrogravitics in operation inside a vacuum put out by NASA and independent researchers.
keyinsight 2 years ago
@keyinsight You may very well be right about lifters...I myself am undecided on the exact propulsion they employ....however I have to point out a slight misconception you have about airfoils. It is not that the air pushes against anything. If an airfoil caried its own air supply it'd work in a vacuum! It is Newton's reaction for every action. It is the same reason a rocket flies in a vacuum. It is not "pushing" against anything.....it is backwards action, which causes a forward reaction.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
Happy 4th of July Chris! Hope to talk to you soon.
ross1323 2 years ago
good job yourself, lifters have always been interesting to me,it would be awesome if this works in a vaccuum as well! then that will get rid of the people who say thats what it is. i feel with the right equipment you could probably make some of the electrostatic aircraft tesla made. there was also a MIT guy would was able to make a high voltage that could lift alot of heavy weight!
boxa888 2 years ago
I highly recommend Paul LaViollette's "Antigravity Propulsion".
LaViolette's book is a text book detailing "back-engineering level" detail of SEVERAL electrogravitic, electrostatic, and free energy tech developed from the electrogravitic phenomena.
LaViolette has developed a physics theory called "Sub-Quantum Kinetics" that predicts and explains these phenomena and MUCH more. This book includes a crash course in Sub-Quantum physics.
His book "Subquantum Kinetics" goes into full detail.
keyinsight 2 years ago
COOL
odin422 2 years ago