Added: 5 years ago
From: RationalResponse
Views: 73,602
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,124)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Theres also an important distinction in what you think objectively and how you act practically. In theory I would espouse nihilism as being how the universe "really is, when you strip away subjectivity", but I see the value in having morality for the sake of mutual protection and comfort, so I follow suit when it comes to my behavior in terms of practicality.

  • where did the universe come from?

  • Curved towards the mouth? Not if you hold it the other way.

  • @rudygetsplenty Well duh. The end of one universe would most logically end with all matter being dragged towards the center of the universe, only to explode outwards again and form new planets and stars to start the cycle anew.

  • dumb

  • OK so this video is fucking hilarious, and debunking it is silly. If somebody sees this and has an OMG-it-must-be-true moment of clarity, you're not going to convince them otherwise using something as boring as "facts". BUT - How in the hell do you make a video designed towards calling out the obvious, and say that the Big Bang which created our universe was caused by 2 objects striking each other. What fucking objects? Doesn't that mean there was already a universe?

  • So their argument for the existence of a god is that precisely one food on the whole of Earth is "designed" to be simple to eat, despite the fact that said food was actually cultivated thousands of years ago into the shape it currently has by humans. Thus, you must explain why coconuts are such a pain in the ass to eat, as are pineapples, chickens, beef, pork, fish, lobster, apples (we need ladders to get the high up ones) and a host of other foods that require intense preparation.

  • Einstein, although not an athiest did not belive in a personal god, rather his idea of a god was represented by the harmony of physics in nature, Einstein never claimed the universe was created by a superintelligent deity

  • the big bang came from a collision of two floating objects you say....oh no you say most likely thats what happened. wouldnt the world b completely random then, like how do we adapt to this world so easily , man i'm tired of commenting on these videos, all i can say is, leave christians alone, you dont have to b mocking when u make a video, ray was a lil mocking in his vid, but u guys dont blieve in nething so y b offended?

  • @bluemoon1012

    We aren't offended by what they are saying, we are frightened by it. Frightened because the idea of a world where religious dogma determines what is right or wrong, what is true and untrue, where law is dictated by religion, is a terrifying prospect. You might know all of that as a Theocracy. The United States is a long ways from becoming a Theocracy, but the goals of people like creationists are a big step in that direction, where religious views are taught as facts.

  • @bluemoon1012

    I would also like to add that although this video singles out a particular sect of Christianity, I on the other hand am not. All the evidence you need to see that religion should not be treated in the way that Creationists want, is in places like Iran, Afghanistan and even Saudi Arabia, where the Islamic religion determines their laws.

  • @bluemoon1012 Re-read that last bit and you'll see why we think you're a bunch of morons...

    Atheists don't believe in a god. Full stop.

    Unfortunately, morons such as yourself circulate the rumour that we're immoral and believe in nothing, which is complete bullshit. Stop spreading lies and maybe we'll take you seriously some day.

  • @WirlWind494 so what do you believe in? and why call me a moron did i insult you?

  • @bluemoon1012 I called you a moron because you're spouting pretentious bullshit about a bunch of people you obviously know nothing about.

    We believe in just as much as you do, except 1 less god. Saying we "believe in nothing" is complete bollocks and I think you'll find most of us are sick of being looked down apon as immoral heathens who believe in nothing.

    We don't believe -in a god or gods-. That's where being an atheist starts and ends.

  • @WirlWind494 erm hypocritical much? half the stuff ur saying i never said , did i say u were immoral or unworthy . no i'm just talking 2 u ur the one with the contempt calling me a moron and claiming 2 know me saying i dont know anything when really.......u dont actually know me ......I just tried 2 have an adult conversation with someone although i am not of the same belief system it doesnt mean i wont show u respect...cleary thats not recpricated

  • @bluemoon1012 "You believe in nothing" is what you said.

    That would mean you're implying I'm a Nihilist. (From the Merriam-Webster dictionary) - "someone who rejects all theories of morality or religious belief."

    As I said before, you're spouting complete bullshit. Furthermore, your religion says that I'm going to be tortured in hell for eternity. Therefore I'm unworthy in your eyes.

    It's not a hard concept. Atheism = doesn't believe in a god, fullstop. See? Simple.

  • @WirlWind494 who am i 2 say ur going 2 hell?..God says....The Bible says....and Jesus says no one shud judge others........sorry 4 saying u belive nothng ..im wrong then ...everybody makes mistakes thats how we learn.

  • @bluemoon1012 Well, it's not hard to draw the line.

    You believe / worship god, so I'd imagine you believe the bible. In there it says I'm gonna go to hell.

    Your god is saying he's gonna torture me forever because I don't believe in him. You're obviously ok with that since you still worship him.

    And I'll let you slide on the believe in nothing thing, I just get it from everyone who finds out so it gets frustrating after a while. I've even been told to my face that I'm immoral etc

  • ...and its even perfect for shoving up Cameron's ass 

  • 96% of Americans believe in god. There was a time when about 96% of the world population believed that the earth was flat.

    Were they right?

  • @photon72 yes. yes they were.

  • Well I think Einstein's "god" was a figurative god which was the undiscovered portion of the universe. Before his death Einstein was trying to formulate a unified theory of everything, a theory that would allow us to "read the mind of god".

  • Kirk;Ray and the bannana make"The Ambigously Duo"look like Chuck norris!!

  • The big bang wasn't a "bang in space", it was a bang OF space!

  • another simple counterpoint:

    Why would God make only ONE fruit in that design? Wouldn't it stand to reason if he was going to make fruit for man to eat, ALL would have the same design? Apples, oranges, peaches, grapes, papaya, avocado, etc...all different shapes and designs.

  • But if sodomy is wrong, why does my penis fit so perfectly into the anus of my girlfriend?

  • @benskin79 Beautiful

  • I love how hurricanes and tsunamis and stuff show how god loves us so much, I wonder what happen if he hated us.

  • @achooothanks Tsunamis of fuckin' lava, I believe.

  • So like.........bananas are made so perfect for humans that (by his goofy rational) that must have been the only one humans were really meant to eat.

  • the second he said that the tip was a tab, he destroyed his argument. most monkeys at the zoo when given a banana peel it from the bottom so that "tab" is a handle, making the last bit of banana easier to eat. people, peel it from the bottom and you wont be disappointed.

  • There's something else that fits perfectly into my right hand.

  • Einstein was a deist, not a christian. They should do their research.

  • @AnonymousAscendent Dude, they're creationists - it's basically their job avoid any form of research possible (save reading the Bible)

  • @fghtyre i doubt they have even read they bible other than the selected bits they like - if you read it entirely - you come away with a feeling that this god is childish and jealous and cruel - if you have afew brain cells firing - you have to ask - why would he want us to kill animals and children to show devotion - why does he never tells us slavery is bad - plus the obvious scientific difficulties of it all - from gentics to physics -it contradicts simple observation

  • no it didnt where did the 2 rocks come from then?

  • the smoking nug, lol. im smoking a nug right now.

  • Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.

  • What if you study a badly made banana, as opposed to a "well made banana"?

  • yes but then who made coconuts pineapples and of course the various poisonous berries i never got how god said in the bible plants and animals were made to be your food really poisonous dart frogs were our food tigers and other man eating cats great white sharks were meant to be our food evolution shows how these creatures could have come to be through natural selection christianity and all other religions where man is gods dominat being do not

  • @lonewolfM16 im not here to comment you like most are, you stated something now im asking you something about it. im not a religious freak but i believe in a creator. poisonous berries poison dart frogs, arent scientists using these types of things and creatures to make new pain killers and medicines? i enjoy science but i also know we dont have all the answers and i do believe in a creator but am not blindly following. wouldnt our advanced brains be our gift to being the dominant animal?

  • @0remylucious0 well yes scientists are creating medicine from it and tribals used poison dart frogs for well poinsonous darts but think of how many people had to die because of these things is it worth the medicine also our dominant brains are amazing but thats mainly because we store and teach knoledge we are not that far up from chimps just far enough to begin advanceing and useing logic also we werent advanced for most of our history the ice age where we were not dominant lasted 10000 year

  • @0remylucious0 also there is still tigers and other predators we may be able to dominate them now but through most of our history we were prey to lions tigers wolves bears ect the only kind of god that seems possible is a apathetic one who simpley tinkers with life by mutation and created everything so he could mess with it and humans have no more specialness to him because of our brains than whales do because of their size this still doesnt explain how a god is possible or how they came to be

  • Lol then who the fuck was the pineapple made for? This man fails on so many levels

  • it's hard to decide what's more pathetic; Comforts argument or the terrible attempt this person made to refute it.

  • why are atheists trying to rebut or argue against this video with the evolution of the bananna? this is really fucking funny, just enjoy the video and laugh at the misfortune of their stupidity...

  • @delic619

    Because blokes like these try VERY hard to get into schools and TEACH their stupidity to CHILDREN?

  • @comiclover788998 well yeah, i understand that. But this is beyond refuting... He's talking about how nicely it fits in the hand an mouths of humans! Next he'll be discussing how nicely a dick fits in the mouth of a female? If there is anyone taking this seriously then they are already lost and no amount of logical explanation could get through to them. Although you might have a point, some very impressionable children might believe this...

  • Christians trying to turn Atheists is like a banana trying to turn an orange into a banana... It's not going to happen, so believe what you believe, regardless of what you believe ,and don't touch my fucking bananas!

  • Your "Big Bang" explanation is false. At least in accordance with the theory.

    That said I agree with everything else.

  • @DiverseLA yes this argument is from the early big bang theory well before the hubble discovery or when einstein got involved with the theory the modern theory or primeval atom theory is much diffrent also i personally perfer time space singualrity theory myself (the theory that states that since time slows around matter time may have not existed before the big bang as all matter was compressed thus all time was compreesed though the infinite cycle sigularity theory also has merit

  • It's ok for people to be athiest. Get over it already. You don't have to be an athiest to understand evolution. Got science?

  • To Ray Comfort: Nice explanation of the banana, now, what about explaining an orange motherfucker.

  • @CelticWarrior1971 or a pineapple xD

  • @CelticWarrior1971

    you will answer to God for every word you have spoken. All the name calling was not necessary, the man was making a point and you don't have to agree with him but the name calling is not right.

  • @chuckyoo: Maybe so, but then again neither is holier than thou I am better than you and you are dirt under my feet and I am not going to be a friend to you unless you are in my little "club" shitty attitude that I have encountered at the hands of these morons who call themselves Christians but obviously have no idea of what it means or indeed how to be a true Christian. This may surprise you, but I used to be a TRUE Christian myself before my fall to the Dark Side, but that's another story.

  • All have sinned and is guilty of God's punishment, doesn't matter if you believe He exists or not, you are still guilty of all the evil things you have done. Jesus died on the cross for the sins you all commited so that instead of receiving the eternal condemnation, through Jesus Christ you will have eternal life. All He asks is that you repent of your sins and put your trust in Him. It is appointed for man to die once, and then judgement. have you thought of where you will spend eternity?

  • @chuckyoo I'll spend the first small part of eternity rotting quietly underground, supporting and sustaining a large colony of necrophagic critters. After they're done, the remnants from their feeding will then likely sustain all manner of plant life, which will in turn sustain animals and insects, before going back to the ground to support more necrophagic critters. Anything else is pure imagination, and fear-mongering to try and sucker people into your incredibly limited world-view. Not buying

  • @chuckyoo have you thought of the moral contradition that someone else can pre-die for YOUR sins? Just becasue you've been taught this does not make it true- this is dark ages fear bull- please get past it. And don't pass it on to children please

  • @chuckyoo If god is so perfect, then why did he wait 4000 or so years for the Jesus dieing part? why didn't he do that up front? If he is Omnipotent he would have known.

  • @Ulfvaldr2012

    God is Omnipotent. God is merciful. God knew when satan rebelled against Him that he will seek to pollute the earth but God wanted to allow the cycle to run its course. He came in the person of Jesus as a way out for those that will repent from their sinful ways and put their trust in him. If Jesus did not come, no one will be here today. The important thing you should be concerned about is your eternity fo it is appointed for man to die once and then judgment.

  • @chuckyoo EXODUS 16:4 NKJ

    Then the Lord said to Moses, "Behold, I will rain bread from heaven for you.that I may test them, whether they will walk in My law or not. If he was Omnipotent he would not have to test but would know peoples heart. Jesus was not really on earth, there is nothing in the bible that can be proven outside of it.

  • comfort and cameron, two of the dumbest assholes ever

  • what the fuck the arguments made in the white letters are so ridiculous i had to stop the video. Spiral galaxies evidence of a collision from the big bang. Where did the collision thing even come from. you make me lol

  • @DeltaGaryGordon

    the big bang wasn't a collision. that guy just fails.

    some of the best arguements for the big bang are redshift and leftover radiation ( forgot the proper term for it ).

    look those up if you're interested though.

  • The big bang was not a collision of two large objects, unless you call branes "objects" and you're a fan of String Theory. This is flatly wrong.

    Einstein was not a believer in God. He sometimes made concessions on this issue, only to retract them later. Once, he even went so far as to say "the word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."

  • Wow and sliced turkey fits perfectly on sandwiches... must have been god...

  • What collided? To giant boxes of popcorn?

  • im sure ray has starred in porno films as he sure knows what he's doing with that banana.

  • Sorry, you've lost me already. So the Universe was created when God banged two bananas together...?

  • hahaha 'ease of entry'

    come on

  • lol and "now if you study a well-made banana"

    

  • holy shit not the banana spiel again - I can't believe there is more than one guy who actually does this routine. call me a homophobe, but the guy doing the demonstration makes me a little uneasy with how he's handlin that fruit.

  • Well then where did the two objects come from?

  • @mjthekingofmusic52 For that matter, where did God come from?

  • check out madam blavatsky and theosophy if you want truth

  • You say that their was a collision of two objects. I thought that the Big Bang implemented Space and Time. So how can matter exist outside of space?

  • @DanMarik

    The explaination is the simplest version.

    To be more precise, what are called "branes" are believed to have collided.

    These branes weren't matter as we know it.

    It involves a lot of weird ideas with quantum mechanics, which in itself is weird.

  • @GreatExterminator Questions, Can these be scientifically observed? If the "Branes" collided what came before them? For they cannot be the beginning because of the natural law of cause and effect would be broken making that supernatural. Bring me an explanation not what "might" have happened, because I do that already with my belief of God.

  • @DanMarik

    Not just now, because they exist outside of our universe. We're restricted to what we can observe in our universe. It's merely a hypotheisis.

    Because this exists outside of our universe, the laws that normally apply within our unvierse become meaningless outside of it, including the ideas of cause and effect. Quantum mechanics already manages to play havoc with that.

    You had a question, so I have you an answer. And it's a more likely answer than an invisible magic man.

  • @GreatExterminator Well thank you. But if something that can exist out of natural law doesn't that mean that God can exist? You say cause and effect mean nothing outside the universe, I have already accepted that with believing in god for the natural laws mean nothing to him. Also calling god an Invisible Magic Man sort-of shows your intelligence. Just because he isn't visible doesn't mean he is invisible. Also magic is breaking the Natural Law, I say they don't apply to him.

  • @DanMarik

    The concept of a god calls for a sentiant being that acts with intelligence.

    The reality of things shows nothing more than natural forces at work.

    If your god isn't invisible, then is it hiding?

    Intelligence has nothing to do with how one refers to one's god. You take the god concept seriously. I do not.

  • @GreatExterminator For one he isn't my god for people have believed in his existence before I came along. Second he doesn't hide, he just "isn't observable" just like those branes. He cannot be observed as of now. Also towards my stand. Your trying to explain something that exists outside of natural law and cannot be observed(two things many atheist put against god) I have accepted it is possible for there to be a supernatural force that created the natural laws that we can observe.

  • @DanMarik Something that isn't observable is invisible. Hence, this god you believe in is invisible, if it exists at all.

    It's rather well known that anything beyond our universe cannot be observed with our current technology. It's not too much a stretch.

    With a supernatural force, however, you call for one to believe that this force is supposed to be sentiant. There's no evidence of this being the case. All we see shows a universe made by natural forces. No god required.

  • @GreatExterminator

    Then god can be beyond our universe.

    Whose says that sentient beings aren't possible beyond the universe.

    If the universe was created by natural forces what began them? Remember don't break the Natural law of Cause and Effect. Ofcourse there is no evidence of a supernatural being that exists outside of natural law. There is no evidence two objects collided with each other and began the big bang.

  • @DanMarik

    As I have said before, we cannot detect anything beyond our universe. We may forver be stuck only knowing what's in our universe.

    Natural forces are more likely than a sentiant being.

    What we do know is that the conditions that we see toward the beginnings of our universe bare a lot of resemblance to that inside a black hole. Those conditions destroy matter. If equally extreme conditions exist beyond the universe, then it's not at all likely a sentiant being could ever arise.

  • cont...

    Also remember this; what evidence indicates that any god had any role in the making of the universe?

  • @GreatExterminator The same evidence that the universe is in itself supernatural. Also we have no clue what the beginning of our universe looks like. That argument you portray is based off an theory off of another theory. We on our short time in this universe have only been able to discern that time is passing not that it ever had a beginning. Its we humans who demand for it to have a beginning.

  • @DanMarik

    That's not any sort of answer.

    If a sentiant being created the universe, then we'd see some signs of that. There are none.

    What we figure is based on tried and true physics. We look at what we know now and work backwards. Also, you might have heard that the further we see with telescopes, the further back in time we see, thanks to the limits of light speed.

    We know the universe expanded from a singular point. All that stuff compacted so small is very VERY hot.

  • @GreatExterminator Why should there be evidence? Please explain which facts support the "true" physics you mention.

  • @DanMarik

    If there's no evidence, then all you have is a bullshit story.

    We know the universe is expanding. We also have detected the cosmic microwave background radiation. We can put those together to see how the universe was. In fact, we can calculate it all the way back to when the universe was a tiny fraction of a second old.

    Look this stuff up for yourself, okay?

  • @GreatExterminator Then sir most of the theories you have presented. I will not accept homework to look fro something that is not there. We have proof that the universe fluctuates we have only been around long enough to see it expand. We haven't been able to determine the beginning date.

  • @DanMarik

    And that would be wrong.

    We now have determined the universe to be around 13.7 billion years old, give or take a few hundred million years.

    We know this thanks to our observations.

    And the description for the evidence IS out there.

    You're just afraid to look.

  • @GreatExterminator We have based the age off of nearby dieing stars. Why should i have to look up shit to support your argument. That's like asking a prisoner to put the straps on. Your argument YOU bring them not me. And we have only a few vague pictures from beyond our galaxy that's it.

  • @DanMarik

    You've shown yourself to know very little about cosmological science.

    I asked you to look up things to educate yourself.

    What there is to be shown far exceeds the single paragraph YouTube allows. It's easier for you to read the stuff yourself by searching for it. I'm not doing homework for you.

    If you really believe the pictures that show things beyond our galaxy are vague, you really ARE out of touch with science.

  • @GreatExterminator I am more in "touch" with science than most people my age. I do not pretend to know cosmology(I hope thats not the beauty school), however if it became apparent that we finally found a source in the universe to judge time by (for we all know time is relative) it would've been extremely large new. And here is my final argument. If the Universe can exist outside of Natural law (making it supernatural) then so can God (for a sentient force would be considered supernatural).

  • @DanMarik You don't seem like it, or you wouldn't resist doing the research.

    The news of the universe's current age estimate has been out for quite some time. So much for you being "in touch".

    The universe doesn't exist outside of natural laws. It's what gave rise to it that does.

    And again, where is the evidence of this god? What makes you think it's even the god of the bible? How would you know it's not someone else's god?

  • @GreatExterminator I know it isn't the god of the bible (well most of the bible). That was taken during the middle ages and changed by the papacy to have the peoples support. Also thank you. An estimate is based off of very little data made to fill in gaps until the actual answer is present. So much for you knowing your terms. The universe must exist out of natural law or it would create a paradox. To Cause and Effect every effect must have have a cause so there could never be a beginning.

  • @DanMarik The estimate comes from data that we have. The figure isn't just a random guess.

    The opening statements you give show that the god you support is a mere human concept, invented by humans, and is altered by humans to fit an ever changing knowledge.

    I'll try AGAIN; the events that lead to the universe forming were outiside of spacetime. But the universe itself functions accordingly to those physical laws that we know of. If you don't get it, don't fucking bother to reply.

  • @GreatExterminator Then its possible for a sentient being to exist outside of space and time.

  • @DanMarik

    In the words of Lois Griffin...

    "Fucking moron".

  • @GreatExterminator Either your quoting a politician or a cartoon character. Both are bad so it doesn't matter. You know someone is getting desperate when they have the lack of intelligence to resort to name-calling. Also throughout our "little discussion" I have not once insulted you, so please when you have a better argument and do not have to resort to insults to hold your own then we can speak again.

  • @DanMarik

    Not only out of touch with science, but also out of touch with pop culture.

    Ever seen Family Guy?

    No, I'm not desperate. I've lost paitence with you acting like a complete chowderhead.

  • @GreatExterminator Uh there is also Lois Griffin a New York politician. You lose patience with people who don't think the same as you? Show how close-minded you are. Also you shouldn't quote cartoon characters. If you can't hold your own don't even try to put up an argument just a complete waste of my time.

  • @DanMarik

    No, I lose patience with people that show that they don't comprehend what's being told to them, especially when I repeated it. Furthermore, you claim things that are false, based on your own ignorance. And despite that I suggested you do research, you did no such thing, and thus continued to spout ignorance.

    I'll quote whoever the fuck I want.

  • @GreatExterminator Ok, I refused to work for you, to look for something that would take up hours. I claimed what you say is based off of lose ended theories, just like religion. It's in your own ignorance that you repeat yourself causing me to refute it once more.

  • @DanMarik Looking up something to educate yourself isn't working for me.

    And I could find such info in a matter of minutes. That it would take YOU hours shows just how out of touch you are.

    And your claim is wrong, based on YOUR ignorance of the matter.

    Stick with your sky daddy and bronze age tales.

  • @GreatExterminator Your right I could find a source that would tell me what you said with a just a few clicks. However thats not enough. I want to know whom suggested the theory, what led him or her to suggest such a theory, when it was first suggested, the suggesters qualifications, whom of the scientific community agrees with said person. And the counter theory (for there is always atleast one counter theory). Not just a random website with the statement written on it.

  • @GreatExterminator CONT. Now if you have nothing else to say, and I do not mean repeat yourself, I wouldn't appreciate continuing this conversation. However if you bring something new to floor I would be glad to hear it.

  • @DanMarik

    "Then god can be beyond our universe."

    Are you dense? So can Santa Claus, and fairies, and magic moon beams, and Transformers, and Teletubbies and EVERYTHING ELSE THAT IS IMAGINARY CAN BE BEYOND OUR UNIVERSE.

    "If the universe was created by natural forces what began them?"

    Let's assume it was a invisible person called "God"...

    "If the universe was created by 'God' what began him?"

    It's called an infinite regress. Look it up. And read some fucking books. PLEASE.

  • @MegaSensimilla Sure anything is possible beyond our universe. I haven't been there so I couldn't tell you.

    Just making the point that from our current "natural laws" this universe cannot exist. Look up Cause and Effect. Apply that to our universe. There could never be a beginning or it would destroy the law of cause and effect, and if it was infinite it would also be declared supernatural. I have already accepted a supernatural beginning to our universe instead of trying to solve a paradox.

  • @MegaSensimilla fuck you! you can't prove that teletubbies don't exist in my mind!

    haha

  • buy his logic aren't apples a bigger piece of proof, I mean after all they're the perfect size of your palm, they're easy to chew and you don't even have to peel them........................Oh my god!!! I actually feel stupider. score:1 christians!

  • Anyone notice that the banana can also fit quiet comfortably in the ass aswell? Maybe thats a sign from god, is it not?

  • I'd like to see this guy explain the miracle of coconuts. Those fuckers are ridiculously hard to open

  • @GuruGeekSan God created those because He gets a laugh watching us try to open them. Pineapples He just is waiting for one someone finally tries to shove one up his ass.

  • @GuruGeekSan look for " Nick Gisburne: Re: The atheist's nightmare: the banana " on youtube . Enough said!

  • @GuruGeekSan no there not, u tape one to a brick wall about 2 feet off the ground and ram your car against it

  • @Zephyesa Normally I would not try to have an actual conversation with someone who advocates ramming your car into a brick wall, but I will be overbearing and assume you are joking. In case you are not, you should try to explain your solution all the many people who lived and died without ever having ridden in, or even seen or heard of, an automobile.

  • @xitsxbobxdearxmex they can invent a car, then use it to open coconuts.

  • Comment removed

  • Such an excellent debunking of this idiotic creationist argument. Im sure their pat response would be "Well God drove this evolution for man's benefit."

    Comfort is such a simple, plain little man its hilarious that he didnt have the education to research this a bit more. You can see where his lack of education immediately lead him onto dangerous ground. He needs to just stay with the God is all powerful stance.

  • @HectorYLaComay

    "stop blindly believing in what science (or religion) tells you."

    I don't. The science I can read up on, and learn more about.

    " do take the time to read Maimonides."

    I will

    Everything else you said.....

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zz

  • @HectorYLaComay

    Whatever Maimonides got right about science was from the perspective of SCIENCE, not religion. So your statement is stupid.

  • @HectorYLaComay

    Maimonides fell pretty short on the Theory of Relativity....

  • try to pause it at 1:13 for the RAY COMFORT BANNANA BLOWJOB EXTRAVAGANZA

    may have to do it manually

  • "the banana is curved towards the face"

  • Yes! How could we be so blind? God designed the banana to fit in our hand perfectly! How could you possibly think God doesn't exist?

    (Sarcasm)

  • Ignorance is bliss.

  • People only look at Ray's interpretation of the banana to be stupid, without realizing that his soda can theory is even more stupid. A can is a man-made object, it has only been in existence for a few hundred years, and it wasn't God that made it, it was someone who thought, "This would make drinks so much easier to preserve and consume". I cannot believe how successful this idiot is.

  • STOP FEEDING THE TROLL

  • if you are eating a banana and discover that it is chewy, its not a banana. i dont know what you have in your mouth but it isn't a fuckin banana

  • HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!­

  • Unfortunately, the only exposure most atheists or non-Christians get to Christianity are people who argument on theories, or those who go on evangelic crusades who’s greatest goal is the thickness of their wallets rather than the hearts of the people who they are supposed to reach. This is a pitty though, since it causes most of them to never even get close to really experiencing God for who He is and what He came to do... yet He longs for a relationship with and still loves you no matter what!

  • I always thought Ray Comfort looked like a good dick sucker. This just further proves it. "You know which foods are shaped liked dicks? The best ones!"

  • So buddy you want to go to Hell, you trying to get others there? Shame on you! "Every knee will bow and tongue confess that Jesus Christ is lord" Get ready one way or another.

  • @ThePsalm40 fuck right off

  • good video making someone that is obviously stupid look stupid, its not too hard.

    woah hang on a second, "the big bang that created out universe was likely a big collision of two objects"??. do some reading and stop making shit up

  • Good video; entertaining. Only objection... fix the Big Bang explanation. It is as inaccuarate of a description as Ray's banana analogy is.

  • that is the dumbest fucking argument against athiesm i have ever seen. when i was younger seeing people like that taking religion seriously made me have doubts.

  • Wow. That was probably the most idiotic "argument" I've ever seen.

  • God made the pineapple the shape it is so that it could not be shoved up Ray Comfort's ass........

    But I'd still like to try it !

  • for proof against gods existence, one need look no further than the 'design' of the male penis. as although, like the banana, it is the perfect size to fit the hand and mouth, unfortunately, unlike the banana, has no precautionary aid to stop the contents squirting in your face. intelligent design? I think not! TAKE THAT AMERICA

  • Jesus loves you.

  • @MJTheKingOfMusic51 no he doesn't. he's dead.

  • @clutchoconnor Jesus loves you.

  • @MJTheKingOfMusic51 my dog is called jesus so if you're talking about him, you're probably right. if you're talking about the jew that lived 2000 years ago (yes, i do believe jesus existed, he just wasn't the son of your pretend god, he was the son of a slut and who knows who else) i doubt it very much. that dude died. thats the end of it as far as he goes. he's DEAD and GONE

  • The BANANA, and obvious creation, by GOD, to fit in the hands of all great apes, as seen in zoo's around the World,...GOD also intelligently designed the banana so that his favorite ape,... RAY COMFORT (created in his own Image) would make a complete ASS out of himself ..... Ray, as a flunky, your god still loves you, and ..We all are enjoying his sense of humer...as well as many more of your fruit basket insights....GO ..Ray go...., how much longer are you going to pettle your shit?

  • 'ease of entry just the right shape for the human mouth...it's ever curved to the face to make the whole process so much easier' LMFAO XD

  • lmao atheists are so funny. Trying to discredit, and call religious people stupid, and then go on to make points like "The big bang that created our universe was LIKELY a big collision of two objects" You people claim that God can't be real, because he cannot be proven, yet you pull facts like that out of your ass THAT ARE NOT PROVEN. Hypocrites. "This is evident in the spiral and bowtie shapes of galaxies" AH, YES OF COURSE. And you people make fun of OUR scriptures LOL

  • @RageAgainstNWO Actually as i recall he is wrong about that collision, the big bang is a false term used...the big bang was actually en expansion from a singularity, the human mind is simply not complex enough to understand the beginning of anything .. for example if there is a god...where did he come from?

  • @RageAgainstNWO

    yeah, we do, cos its fuckin stupid. whoever made this video has no concept of the big bang but at least he/she accepts that god didn't create the world in 7 fuckin days. if your god has been ever present, ie for hundreds of billions of trillions of years, and our galaxy is only 13 billion tears old, what the fuck was he at for all that time. and, after having such a long rest, how the fuck did he need to take a day off after only 6 days work. religion is a cancer, get some chemo

  • @clutchoconnor "if your god has been ever present, ie for hundreds of billions of trillions of years, and our galaxy is only 13 billion tears old, what the fuck was he at for all that time." I'm not sure, I'm not a athiest, I can't pretend I know what the thought, or logic of a God would be.

  • @RageAgainstNWO "logic of A god". how many gods do you worship

  • @clutchoconnor Just the one who has three forms.

  • @RageAgainstNWO yeah, pretend, imaginary and false

  • If he's going to say that god fully designed the banna for one species of animal, then he should stick it up his ass since a bananna looks like a penetrstion tool if you catch my drift. This guy is fucking retarted.

  • my banana will be ray's nightmare

  • IT'S A WILD BANANA! RUN!

  • while this video effectively refutes this argument, there is a simpler way to disprove it, all it takes is 1word WATERMELONS!

  • stupid christian twat!!!

  • Good video, I didn't actually know wild bananas looked so different!

  • Yeah, if I saw one of those thing's I'd stay away from it for fear of it, you know, killing me

  • No! Its exactly the other way around!

    Einstein WAN an Atheist, and he was always angry when religious people tried to "recrut" him!

    He used the word God only in a metaphorical sense, in a poetical sense!

  • I've said it once and I'll say it again, bananas are easier to open on the other end...