It is too bad Rene never got to study the research of Dr. Judy Wood in her book, "Where Did The Towers Go?" By her title we learn that the WTC complex did not 'collapse' but was turned into dust, including the massive steel support columns.
The photo at 9:27 actually shows the firefighters using a hand-held light (flashlight) to look down a hole. This gives it an artificially-intense glow.
Ralph Rene' was not a scientist in any sense of the word. His claims that steel buildings won't collapse, even if they're on fire sends one in that general direction. I was personally acquainted with Mr. Rene' and can tell you this was not a person with a solid knowledge of metallurgy, thermodynamics or forensic pathology. He was just plain wrong, about so many things.
Typical Hoaxer metality, reach your conclusion without any of the facts. Here Ralph mulls over three different possibilities, each aiming towards"JEWS DID WTC!" and never once considered the simple, logical and real story told in the photo... They were using lights to check out a hole for suvivors/bodies.
@cockroachafro There are many accounts of seeing molten steel or red hot areas. This couldn't happen because of a few puny office fires. Certainly not 6 weeks after.
Allison the youtube crash "expert" LOL If you are going to bash the official facts about 9-11, you should at least know what said facts are. You can't make crap up and say "these are the lies that the government is selling us".
By comparing genuine plane wreck sites to the 911 sites, its easy to conclude that no real planes were used on 911. The planes were done with a computer graphics program. Notice all the plane wreck debris missing from the four 911 sites... such as whole tail sections, whole wing sections, seats, luggage, cargo, bodies and those indestructible titanium jet engines. So, there weren't any plane deaths because there weren't any planes. For sure, NYC firefighters died but others????
I greatly respect and appreciate your work and have the highest regard for the memory of Ralph Rene'; however, current 911 evidence suggests that Mr Rene' got this one wrong. The 3000 dead figure wasn't too low, it was too high. The governments goal was to inflame our emotion so we would go to war i.e. the higher the reported death toll, the better. 2/3rds of the towers did not even have floors and collapsed into a skimpy 30' debris pile. Go to LETS ROLL FORUMS DOT COM
Will you comment on the missing background in the live news broadcast Jarrah? It was a "picture Perfect" day. How COULD this live broadcast be real? How is it possible? Not even a backgroud in the live news footage??
I find it mind boggling that Americans still think, after 9 years, that Muslim extremists with box cutters were able to take advantage of NORAD during a drill it was running, perform top gun level flight maneuvers in commercial aircraft and hit their marks without even a fly-by to line the jets up. All the way from 33,000ft! All of what I just said, IMPOSSIBLE! 9-11 is well known to be heavily polluted with mossad activity and personnel. It was a mossad operation.
I'm not a Muslim but I believe we should be discreet in referring to the "Islam" or "Islamic" religion. It is incorrect to stereotype all Muslims as terrorists. Otherwise all Muslims you meet on the streets should be held accountable. Try to study or read about Islam before making comments.
As to 911, Osama Bin Laden is NOT the one behind it.
@receiver69 As for JFK: use the same bullets. They change direction 7 times. You can kill all the afganistan people with less than a million bullets and have their pipeline and their opium.
Funny you speak of FAITH. You must have quite a bit of faith in missions named after a mythical God! Over forty years later and you still believe in radiation-proof test pilots, with no ROCK solid proof. Has your ego, or your pride gotten in the way of your intellect? The global concensus doesn't mean squat, since the vast majority of human beings part of that concensus, have no clue about the radiation in space. For the professionals that do, their only explanation for Apollo success is LUCK!
your perspective of the moon landings is off-base in my point of view, but here you ARE hitting the key marks. way to go! and i subbed because we did go to the moon and i wanted to see your crackpot reasons on how we didn't. this is where you need to be spending your energy
9/11 is the most important turning point of our era, and there are still people out there thinking Islamics did it. Information like this is precious, like all other documentaries about it. Great work Jarrah.
@receiver69 Area 51 isn't a conspiracy pal. It's a place in Rachel, Nevada that you can visit. What goes on there is up for speculation. It's obviously been used as the location for testing top secret aircraft. Do you contest that?
As for JFK, I suppose you believe in MAGIC bullets? If so, I have some land just south of Florida for sale!
No one wants to believe agencies within our government killed 3000 plus of it's own! Yet all signs point to it! Even the blind can see that!
Jarrah .. I was hoping you would make a video about 911 on the anniversary of the of the most horrible conspiracy ever committed by the US governent.
It's hard to believe this horror took place 9 years ago.. It's also hard to believe it's been 47 years since the CIA had President Kennedy assassinated and over 40 years since NASA faked Apollo.
Now Rob, or one of the other ignorant clowns who litter up your chanel, can ask me if I believe in every "conspiracy theory" out there.
the firemen round the glow picture was taken as they lowered a powerful searchlight into a cavity searching for survivors. There was plenty of molten iron at ground zero but this picture shows nothing suspicious. I respect Renes opinion but i'm afraid this is one thing he got wrong.
@educution If the photo depicts firemen looking down at something of the temperature Jarrah and Rene claim I doubt very much they would all be leaning directly over it in the fashion they are! OF COURSE its simply the brilliant glow of a light they're using to illuminate the hole. But Jarrah's - or Rene's - thinking won't even consider this obvious explanation.
@Apogee02UK i disagree. I have found Jarrah very willing and able to consider other possibilities and quite a rational thinker to boot. Those of us that are rational in our debating are quite willing to accept logical correction when we are mistaken (nobodys perfect). Jarrah has politely corrected me twice, others such as yourself cannot or will not debate and just fling insults around. That dosen't make you look as smart as you think it does, just so you know..
@educution Your experience and observation of Jarrah is clearly very different from mine. Time and again, his assumptions and misguided conclusion-jumping have been shown to be less than conclusive and his tactic is simply to ignore it when this happens REGARDLESS of how 'rationally' it is presented to him. He only engages with those whom he feels shares his own bias on any given subject. Your faith in his integrity as a debater is very nice but it is missplaced I assure you.
@Apogee02UK Handwaving? That's all you have eh? I don't blame you though. Anyone who gets into specifics about Jarrah's videos, end up getting their ass handed to them! And those who consider themselves experts on Apollo, will either avoid him like the plague, or serve up red herrings!
@un4g1v3n1 Yes, presumably Jarrah's irrefutable arguments are why he's been been front page news these past few years? Why he's converted and recruited a loyal band of scientists, historians and engineers the world over who can see the truth in his brilliant arguments? Why he's succeeded in overturning history as we know it? Instead of preaching to a miniscule congregation of the logically-challenged? Good luck with that :)
@Apogee02UK Jarrah isn't trying to convert anyone...He's made excellent videos which prove conclusively that NASA has some splaining to do. And those who have tried to splain, have had their asses handed to them, time and time again. Or they run away like little pansies..PLAIT to be exact.
Why don't you go troll videos where you stand a chance of being taken seriously...Oh, wait, you have no such intentions now do you?
@un4g1v3n1 'Converted' is the operative word here because what we're talking about really is a matter of faith. There are dozens of videos on YT demolishing Jarrah's dodgy arguments but if you choose to ignore them or dismiss them you do so as a matter of faith not science, logic or reason. You could argue that I'm doing the same thing. But, frankly, if its a matter of faith, I'll side with the global concensus that the moonhoax is bunk. You side with the guy who can barely do maths if you like
@un4g1v3n1 No. Nobody has had their ass handed to them. When they refute you, you just block them like a little pussy. You did that exact same thing to me. Stop your censorship, argue and face your opponents like a man and then try to talk shit on people.
Before JFK assassination got enough evidence, you were considered silly if you supported someone else than Oswald as the sniper(s). Now if you suggest Oswald was the shooter, you are considered silly.
Few first years any engineers or architects supporting the 9/11 conspiracy were ridiculed. Steven Jones was standing alone with his nano-thermite claims. But the more time has passed and people been informed, the more professionals have started to support the conspiracy idea.
Oh yeah, and while in a topic "ridiculed to believe in a conspiracy", one just have to take up UFOs. Believers of UFOs have been probably more ridiculed than anyone else.
The tone has however changed recently. France, UK, Sweden, Chile, Mexico and few others admitted their military has in fact investigated UFOs for decades, and consider them a serious, existing phenomena and published cases.
But how many peer revied papers you find of UFOs? And how many civilian scientists investigating them?
@receiver69 - Conspiracy? I'll give you conspiracy: A guy living in a cave hijaced 4 planes and crashed them into some building and killed 3000 patriots. THAT is a really wild conspiracy theory.
Commercial plane crashes, foreign hijackers and victims is what the perpetual war on terror is based up on. There are no forensic evidence for any commercial plane crashes this day, All the crucial TV footage is fake as hell - even a child can see that. 911 is as fake as the Moon landings. No commercial plane crashes, no foreign hijackers and NO VICTIMS - everything is faked.
yea how could only 3k ppl die!
mediaservers 5 days ago
It is too bad Rene never got to study the research of Dr. Judy Wood in her book, "Where Did The Towers Go?" By her title we learn that the WTC complex did not 'collapse' but was turned into dust, including the massive steel support columns.
mujaku 1 month ago
The music is very apropo
9thfloorchaos 1 month ago
This is one of the only conspiracy theories that I truly hate and find largely offensive to me and other americans.
It's just so dead wrong. You should do only moon hoax things, Jarrah. I hate this theory.
By the way, check out "RKOwens4". He debunks all the 9-11 bullshit floating around.
yesiamawizardjonny 7 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny who cares!
yourmajezty 7 months ago
The photo at 9:27 actually shows the firefighters using a hand-held light (flashlight) to look down a hole. This gives it an artificially-intense glow.
MattBeckstrom 8 months ago
Ralph Rene' was not a scientist in any sense of the word. His claims that steel buildings won't collapse, even if they're on fire sends one in that general direction. I was personally acquainted with Mr. Rene' and can tell you this was not a person with a solid knowledge of metallurgy, thermodynamics or forensic pathology. He was just plain wrong, about so many things.
bddc201 9 months ago
watch september clues
BroBroDude 1 year ago
10:22
Typical Hoaxer metality, reach your conclusion without any of the facts. Here Ralph mulls over three different possibilities, each aiming towards"JEWS DID WTC!" and never once considered the simple, logical and real story told in the photo... They were using lights to check out a hole for suvivors/bodies.
cockroachafro 1 year ago
@cockroachafro There are many accounts of seeing molten steel or red hot areas. This couldn't happen because of a few puny office fires. Certainly not 6 weeks after.
howitzer24 11 months ago
Allison the youtube crash "expert" LOL If you are going to bash the official facts about 9-11, you should at least know what said facts are. You can't make crap up and say "these are the lies that the government is selling us".
Sorry, those are YOUR lies dumbass.
I
V
dreadnaught2 1 year ago
continued...
By comparing genuine plane wreck sites to the 911 sites, its easy to conclude that no real planes were used on 911. The planes were done with a computer graphics program. Notice all the plane wreck debris missing from the four 911 sites... such as whole tail sections, whole wing sections, seats, luggage, cargo, bodies and those indestructible titanium jet engines. So, there weren't any plane deaths because there weren't any planes. For sure, NYC firefighters died but others????
AllisonsHunt 1 year ago
Jarrah,
I greatly respect and appreciate your work and have the highest regard for the memory of Ralph Rene'; however, current 911 evidence suggests that Mr Rene' got this one wrong. The 3000 dead figure wasn't too low, it was too high. The governments goal was to inflame our emotion so we would go to war i.e. the higher the reported death toll, the better. 2/3rds of the towers did not even have floors and collapsed into a skimpy 30' debris pile. Go to LETS ROLL FORUMS DOT COM
AllisonsHunt 1 year ago
Will you comment on the missing background in the live news broadcast Jarrah? It was a "picture Perfect" day. How COULD this live broadcast be real? How is it possible? Not even a backgroud in the live news footage??
elbuggo 1 year ago
@elbuggo check out "September Clues" (you may view it completely in google videos).
EVDaniken08 1 year ago
I find it mind boggling that Americans still think, after 9 years, that Muslim extremists with box cutters were able to take advantage of NORAD during a drill it was running, perform top gun level flight maneuvers in commercial aircraft and hit their marks without even a fly-by to line the jets up. All the way from 33,000ft! All of what I just said, IMPOSSIBLE! 9-11 is well known to be heavily polluted with mossad activity and personnel. It was a mossad operation.
DemonDik 1 year ago
I'm not a Muslim but I believe we should be discreet in referring to the "Islam" or "Islamic" religion. It is incorrect to stereotype all Muslims as terrorists. Otherwise all Muslims you meet on the streets should be held accountable. Try to study or read about Islam before making comments.
As to 911, Osama Bin Laden is NOT the one behind it.
EVDaniken08 1 year ago
@EVDaniken08
LIAR
EGMAG 1 year ago
@receiver69
More good JFK-stuff
Ex-FBI Agent Don Adams: Bombshell Account of JFK's Last Days and Why He was Killed 1/3
watch?v=4I4ksS6uQwA
Aurinkohirvi 1 year ago
@receiver69 As for JFK: use the same bullets. They change direction 7 times. You can kill all the afganistan people with less than a million bullets and have their pipeline and their opium.
gijsshu 1 year ago
Funny you speak of FAITH. You must have quite a bit of faith in missions named after a mythical God! Over forty years later and you still believe in radiation-proof test pilots, with no ROCK solid proof. Has your ego, or your pride gotten in the way of your intellect? The global concensus doesn't mean squat, since the vast majority of human beings part of that concensus, have no clue about the radiation in space. For the professionals that do, their only explanation for Apollo success is LUCK!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
your perspective of the moon landings is off-base in my point of view, but here you ARE hitting the key marks. way to go! and i subbed because we did go to the moon and i wanted to see your crackpot reasons on how we didn't. this is where you need to be spending your energy
regjoe30 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@receiver69 Why don't you answer the question posed to you?
Do you, or do you not, believe in MAGIC BULLETS?
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
0:02 - 0:14 - Fake as hell -> watch?v=wkZKOqYMbXo
elbuggo 1 year ago
9/11 is the most important turning point of our era, and there are still people out there thinking Islamics did it. Information like this is precious, like all other documentaries about it. Great work Jarrah.
22700p 1 year ago
September 11 2010 - 9th Year Summary
watch?v=MBr3zIZLaLM
greenmagoos 1 year ago
Yet, the most dangerous jump in retard logic is "9-11 was fake, so the Islamic threat is fake"
CorrosionX3 1 year ago
@receiver69 Area 51 isn't a conspiracy pal. It's a place in Rachel, Nevada that you can visit. What goes on there is up for speculation. It's obviously been used as the location for testing top secret aircraft. Do you contest that?
As for JFK, I suppose you believe in MAGIC bullets? If so, I have some land just south of Florida for sale!
No one wants to believe agencies within our government killed 3000 plus of it's own! Yet all signs point to it! Even the blind can see that!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
Excellent work once again Mr.Rene...and Mr. White
trexx32 1 year ago
Jarrah .. I was hoping you would make a video about 911 on the anniversary of the of the most horrible conspiracy ever committed by the US governent.
It's hard to believe this horror took place 9 years ago.. It's also hard to believe it's been 47 years since the CIA had President Kennedy assassinated and over 40 years since NASA faked Apollo.
Now Rob, or one of the other ignorant clowns who litter up your chanel, can ask me if I believe in every "conspiracy theory" out there.
straydog02 1 year ago
@receiver69
Rob .. You act more like a US government disinfo agent , instead of just another ignorant , closed minded fool on YouTube.
Well, on second thought, you act more like the latter, since you don't have the smarts to be a professional shill.
straydog02 1 year ago
the firemen round the glow picture was taken as they lowered a powerful searchlight into a cavity searching for survivors. There was plenty of molten iron at ground zero but this picture shows nothing suspicious. I respect Renes opinion but i'm afraid this is one thing he got wrong.
educution 1 year ago
@educution If the photo depicts firemen looking down at something of the temperature Jarrah and Rene claim I doubt very much they would all be leaning directly over it in the fashion they are! OF COURSE its simply the brilliant glow of a light they're using to illuminate the hole. But Jarrah's - or Rene's - thinking won't even consider this obvious explanation.
Apogee02UK 1 year ago
@Apogee02UK i disagree. I have found Jarrah very willing and able to consider other possibilities and quite a rational thinker to boot. Those of us that are rational in our debating are quite willing to accept logical correction when we are mistaken (nobodys perfect). Jarrah has politely corrected me twice, others such as yourself cannot or will not debate and just fling insults around. That dosen't make you look as smart as you think it does, just so you know..
educution 1 year ago
@educution Your experience and observation of Jarrah is clearly very different from mine. Time and again, his assumptions and misguided conclusion-jumping have been shown to be less than conclusive and his tactic is simply to ignore it when this happens REGARDLESS of how 'rationally' it is presented to him. He only engages with those whom he feels shares his own bias on any given subject. Your faith in his integrity as a debater is very nice but it is missplaced I assure you.
Apogee02UK 1 year ago
@Apogee02UK Handwaving? That's all you have eh? I don't blame you though. Anyone who gets into specifics about Jarrah's videos, end up getting their ass handed to them! And those who consider themselves experts on Apollo, will either avoid him like the plague, or serve up red herrings!
U suggest you stop before your wrist weakens!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 Yes, presumably Jarrah's irrefutable arguments are why he's been been front page news these past few years? Why he's converted and recruited a loyal band of scientists, historians and engineers the world over who can see the truth in his brilliant arguments? Why he's succeeded in overturning history as we know it? Instead of preaching to a miniscule congregation of the logically-challenged? Good luck with that :)
Apogee02UK 1 year ago
@Apogee02UK Jarrah isn't trying to convert anyone...He's made excellent videos which prove conclusively that NASA has some splaining to do. And those who have tried to splain, have had their asses handed to them, time and time again. Or they run away like little pansies..PLAIT to be exact.
Why don't you go troll videos where you stand a chance of being taken seriously...Oh, wait, you have no such intentions now do you?
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 'Converted' is the operative word here because what we're talking about really is a matter of faith. There are dozens of videos on YT demolishing Jarrah's dodgy arguments but if you choose to ignore them or dismiss them you do so as a matter of faith not science, logic or reason. You could argue that I'm doing the same thing. But, frankly, if its a matter of faith, I'll side with the global concensus that the moonhoax is bunk. You side with the guy who can barely do maths if you like
Apogee02UK 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 No. Nobody has had their ass handed to them. When they refute you, you just block them like a little pussy. You did that exact same thing to me. Stop your censorship, argue and face your opponents like a man and then try to talk shit on people.
yesiamawizardjonny 7 months ago
@Apogee02UK
Before JFK assassination got enough evidence, you were considered silly if you supported someone else than Oswald as the sniper(s). Now if you suggest Oswald was the shooter, you are considered silly.
Few first years any engineers or architects supporting the 9/11 conspiracy were ridiculed. Steven Jones was standing alone with his nano-thermite claims. But the more time has passed and people been informed, the more professionals have started to support the conspiracy idea.
Aurinkohirvi 1 year ago
Oh yeah, and while in a topic "ridiculed to believe in a conspiracy", one just have to take up UFOs. Believers of UFOs have been probably more ridiculed than anyone else.
The tone has however changed recently. France, UK, Sweden, Chile, Mexico and few others admitted their military has in fact investigated UFOs for decades, and consider them a serious, existing phenomena and published cases.
But how many peer revied papers you find of UFOs? And how many civilian scientists investigating them?
Aurinkohirvi 1 year ago
Check out 'Missing LInks', it breaks down the Israeli connection to Sept. 11: watch?v=YResfXTXd1c
FranG1214 1 year ago
@receiver69 - Conspiracy? I'll give you conspiracy: A guy living in a cave hijaced 4 planes and crashed them into some building and killed 3000 patriots. THAT is a really wild conspiracy theory.
elbuggo 1 year ago
@elbuggo and then we killed 1.5 million iraqis, over 700,000 which were unarmed women and children? You fucking ignorant person, thats genocide.
piffpete420 1 year ago
Commercial plane crashes, foreign hijackers and victims is what the perpetual war on terror is based up on. There are no forensic evidence for any commercial plane crashes this day, All the crucial TV footage is fake as hell - even a child can see that. 911 is as fake as the Moon landings. No commercial plane crashes, no foreign hijackers and NO VICTIMS - everything is faked.
elbuggo 1 year ago
@elbuggo
now that is disinfo!
dragnet53 1 year ago
Also check out the 9/11 loose change and fabled enemies for more information.
dragnet53 1 year ago
@dragnet53 - Loose Change is pure disinfo propaganda shills.
elbuggo 1 year ago
@elbuggo
LOL okay prove it?
dragnet53 1 year ago