What are the chances of an building burning unequally on different floors to fall down at the excact same moment after hours of burning? This is just so unbelieveably obvious.
Didnt donald rumsfeld say on sept 10, 2001 that he was looking into missing $2.3 trillion from pentagon? Hmmm Pentagon and building 7 destroyed where files are kept. lol
Truther Guess what your Wrong The president or Government would not kill there own Close Close Family Freinds In the PENTAGON Air Head... Ther are the Highest of The Highest of the Government CIA NSA Generals . Highest of the Navy all of them are Freinds and Family..Point #. 2 the President does Not, Ever . Ever need permission to wage a war if there is a Threat.. Read the Constatution..so get off the Crack!!
America, you better pay attention now. These murderers want it all. 9-11 was a total inside job. Get a private foreign investigation to conduct this. Watch "Freedom to fascism", on You Tube. No more Congressional investigations.
2.25 seconds of freefall at the onset of total collapse. David Chandler proves this in his analysis.
That equates to roughly 8 storeys of structural steel support giving way, across the entire width and depth of the buildings, within miliseconds of each other.
Scientifically speaking, if we observe this fact and formulate multiple hypotheses, starting with the most likely, you will find that Fire-Induced collapse is AT THE BOTTOM of the list.
I was talking about the top of the list of probable causes... but you've misunderstood, by choice or accident.
you're referring to the penthouse, which did collapse first. happy to admit it. but please don't try to tell me that the interior of the structure disappeared in the intervening seconds and then the 'shell' that was left fell down. that's even more unbelievable than fire induced collapse.
...and just becasue some in the truth movement say the towers fell at freefall, or that giant space lasers brought them down, or that aliens did it, or there were no planes... doesn't mean we all do. there are nuts on both sides of this discussion, so don't tar me with the same brush and i'll try not to equate you with the retards who believe Bush and Cheney are innocent, decent people.
For example, you imply here that steel has to MELT. in order for the building to collapse, and therefore you believe that it retains 100% of its strength until it LIQUIFIES.
In other words, you have NO sense.
As for the Patriot Act, that's more paranoid hysteria and crying wolf, claiming that 9/11 was an inside job as a conspiracy to invade Iraq, and for TSA to feel up people's junk.
Either the steel DID melt, in which case you have to explain HOW, because there is simply no way you can get temperateures HIGH enough to melt the steel in an office fire (even fuelled by jet fuel)
OR the steel did NOT melt but lost structural integrity (which i believe you're arguing for) in which case we still have to explain why there was molten steel found under all three WTC buildings.
"OR the steel did NOT melt but lost structural integrity (which i believe you're arguing for) in which case we still have to explain why there was molten steel found under all three WTC buildings."
That's begging the question, because the molten metal was NEVER tested-- and so to claim that it was "molten steel," is just one more foil-hat crackpot claim.
Try that on someone who HASN'T studied the issue in detail; you might sneak it past them.
We're going in circles now. the rubble and steel from the WTC was never tested, correct. For what is probably the single biggest crimescene in history, there was little or no testing done. steel girders were shipped off to be recycled and rubble was trucked away without so much as a 'let's store it and analyse it' from anyone. the investigation was a farce. THAT is why we want a new one.
YOU are going in circles, and the METAL was never tested--so you CANNOT claim that it was steel.
You are intellectually dishonest.
I ONLY agree with Bill Maher about one thing: TRUTHERS, when he says. "When you see 2 jets slam into 2 buildings and watch them burn for 2 hours, and say 'yeah, if you wanna believe THAT was the cause,' then maybe you should stop asking whether 9/11 was an inside job, and starting asking your doctor whether Paxil is right for YOU."
Me, Intellectually dishonest? If that came from someone whose opinions i valued, and who had even the smallest shred of credibilty, I might actually be offended.
...But I don't take offense easily, and am all too aware that since you have your blinkers firmly screwed onto the side of your head, puncturing your brain, there is only ever one place you will go - where they point you, where they tell you.
go now, and don't let independent thought get in your way.
@ThePassiveFist Pretty simple, the fire could burn hot enough. I'm a blacksmith and I can tell you with just a hair dryer and basic fuel I can make a fire hot enough to melt steel. Now looking at the height of the towers and the amount of air blowing through the gaping hole in the side with a fire burning fueled by jet fuel and everything else in that office....and you got a pretty good forge like setup.
That is the biggest load of horseshit i have heard in a long time... and I've just been having a debate with a climate change denier, so that's saying something. you can melt steel with a hair dryer and petrol? prove it. i could claim that i can dry up a lake with a hairdryer and number 2 pencil but that does not make it so. show me.
@ThePassiveFist I didn't say Petrol. Maybe learn to read. I said fuel, there's a difference sunshine. And I'm not proving how a forge works. That would entail science which you 911 theorists ignore. I'm not debating this issue because it would be pointless. There is SOOOO much science against you 911 nuts that it is laughable that you ignore it all and stick to your guns. You spew your nonsense and have the audacity to call someone explaining how easy it is to melt steel horseshit. LOL
@brandonk42 And by the way professor, the steel didn't even need to melt. At 1100 degrees it loses 50% of it's strength. (BUT BUT THERE WAS MOLTEN STEEL AT THE BOTTOM!!!) Don't even attempt that horseshit either as that's been debunked 5 times over. (BUT, IT FELL AT FREE FALL SPEED??!?!) Pancaking..look it up because I'm not explaing. Fill the void in your life with something else because your backing a loser on this one.
@ThePassiveFist Wow, I actually took the time to read through your discussion with SovereignStatesman and he's completely hit everything on the head. You can message me back if it makes you feel better but trust me when I say I won't even read them or debate this with you after your plain and simple ignoring of every fact he presented you. Do the world a favor and don't use "scientifically speaking" ever again. You apparently know nothing about it.
The thing about engineers is that they can rarely figure out the obvious-- like in this case it's obvious that the building collapsed from the bottom floor upward, but here he's claiming that it should have happened TOP-DOWN.
So architects and engineers with NO QUALIFATIONS IN BUILDING-DAMAGE decided to prove that opinions are like assholes: everybody got one, and some butthurt ones are fucked.
@ncdave4life both of your links take me nowhere. If you look up "controlled demolition gone wrong" you will see numerous instances where a building has not collapsed at near free-fall speed and not in their own footprint. Once again these are CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS. I am an engineering major and disagree with you along with the other 1300 architects and engineers.
The 7 WTC collapse looks odd only because conspiracy nuts use video taken from the undamaged north side, so you can't see the smoke billowing from virtually the entire south side of the building, as it burned out of control. Here's a video they never show you:
youtube(dot)com(slash)watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U
Tall buildings MUST fall at nearly free-fall speed, if they ever fall. The laws of physics require it:
burtonsys(dot)com(slash)staticvdyn
(I was a physics major for 2 yrs b4 switching majors.)
It was in smoke...so what! Fire cannot cause free-fall, and I am a nut because I believe in scientific laws like the conservation of momentum, and Newtons laws of motion. Get a life pal...reason always wins out in the end.
the whole thing is a psy-op especially his 'heads up' where he tells you about the 'murderer who taunted the victims famliy' and the bloody mexican scenerio'. Geraldo Riveira didnt come to his senses; this entire piece has nothing to do with the victims fmilies mking headway either. Its a 100% psy-op on the elite's part to start a revolution for THEIR end and your loss.
Yep, our country is screwed. Is there any other way to see America if all of this is true. Other countries aren't innocent, but the other thugs will say about the US when we finally get knocked off, "Hey look at that bigger thug, get him, he made us do our thugging."
Geraldo is punk! hes spin doctor. he came to truck stop 20 years ago and started doing some story about truck drivers. Brought in some college students walking around with there dress up there asses. Geraldo , I havent seen a steel building fall since. Insurance job! Money for the gangsters
Larry Silverstein revealed this years ago! What is the big surprise? Are people that dense? Our government serves one purpose...to raise Revenue for the privately owned Federal Reserve. Multinational corporations know no patriotism and pay very little in taxes compared to the average person. The whole thing is a fraud anyway.
Can anybody even tell me if there is any building in the history that fell at free fall speed like a controlled demolition from a fire like building 7??
@laffredo I'd be happy to supply you the answer! Helllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Noooooooooooooooooooo! 9/11 was an INSIDE FUCKIN JOB! May the perps burn in hell!
You clearly have no understanding of Newton of physics. By the way you said near....there was nothing near about wtc7. It was total...and impossible for fire.
@midtownloft1 - Hopefully it's because some of them in the mainstream media outlets are finally waking up, or have grown some balls and just decided to say it. Glenn Beck has been stepping further out over the edge, so to speak, lately too...Finally talking about things that Alex Jones has been outting for the past 10 years...There is a big awakening going on and I think people that have been keeping their mouths shut are finally saying "F-it, it needs to be said"...
@wahahn Waking up or playing the game to destroy our reputation? Funny how Rupert Murdoch's media starts coming out about 911 especially on Fox News, and then suddenly his media corporation starts collapsing in britain with the phone hacking allegations?
Does someone still think that FOX isn't fair and balanced? Fox is the on the cutting edge of journalism. Now I know why so many hate and criticize Fox.
Because that building was a command bunker for so many Gov't agencies, we had it pre-wired with demo-explosives when we built it. We had to keep it a secret from the public for security reasons. So....you got us. We now freely admit that it was controlled demolition but it was not for the reasons YOU think. Now go away."
Are you gys ssure Geraldo deserves to be insulted?....I am sure that Fox must have some angle (what that could possibly be is completely beyond me) but Geraldo's covering of this was completely fair...more than fair. Geraldo did a good job...maybe he just wants to be the guy that breaks the story. You know he was the guy that first aired the Zapruder film of Kennedy right?
@niverent if he was interested in breaking the story, he would have broke it bare minimum 5 years ago, instead he was busy telling 911 truthers to get a life.
@drevenkaine Another way of looking at it is that Truthers have to use effective ways of communnicating the Truth. Chanting "9/11 was an inside job" is not very effective. Showing WTC7 is very effective. This whole thing shows how effective the Buildingwhat campaign is. Also, don't forget that Geraldo is the only person in the mainstream media to pick this up. You do know Geraldo was the first person to show the Zapruder film on TV don't you?
@niverent Yes I do know about his showing the Zapruder film. But AE for 911 truth has been talking about building 7 for many years now. Most every 911 truther has used Building 7 as their main show case as to why it was an inside job, or at the very least with help from the inside. You're being overly optimistic. I am right in what I am saying and you will see it soon.
@drevenkaine I didn't say Geraldo is defintely good...I am just not sure he is evil either. It seems pretty clear FOX must have something up their sleeve (but I cannot for the life of me figure out what that is.) Trust me....I'm as leary about this as the next guy but the fact is that Geraldo is the first to break the story and he did it in an entirely positive light. He even plugged their website. I don't know what to make of this...it's getting interesting though isn't it?
@niverent MSM has been acting especially crazy as of late. Did you see the clip where MSNBC is saying we need a revolution, then had some leftist commentator on their talking about how you could never get enough Socialism. check out the clip on my channel.
Video of Shanghai skyscraper inferno as 8 killed in China fire
watch?v=nH5-DpMObGc
Hmmm.... A 30-story high-rise engulfed in an inferno and still standing? Someone's pulling my leg. No free-fall collapse. I've seen other buildings fall from smaller fires than what it looks like here. WTC Building Seven, for example. Something smells like bullshit - OLD bullshit.
@svord2 Now they have to re-open the Oklahoma City Bombing too because a lot did not add up in that tragedy. Do a Google search for the former director of the Los Angeles branch of the FBI by the name "Ted Gunderson" and see his opinion about OKC Bombing. A lot of traitors are in the government that must be brought to justice. And never forget, the sentencing for treason and murder is usually DEATH. Then their next Judgment will come from God Almighty himself.
the people calling truthers "whackjobs", and "lunatics"..really arent to blame...they are victims of the slickest propaganda machine the world has ever seen...their ignorance,and self delusion,however have been the reason why we are loosing our rights under the Patriot Act I & II.
I think that every 911 truther should be able to sue Geraldo for slander for calling them whack jobs. It is obvious to me that there is a terrible purpose for the MSM to be covering this now. They have an ulterior motive, and it has nothing to do with goodness and truth.
My first thought is simply to get the US into a violent revolution. Cause these brain-amputees calling truthers whack jobs will surely be the first to get violent... - if they figure out what really happened.
If the truth comes out, and 9/11 is determined to have been an attack on the U.S. citizens by our own government to further a political agenda - it may be the end of the U.S. - We may be seen by the world as the most dangerous (which we may be now) but also a ROUGE nation. It would make us a very real target. The EU, Russia, China, etc., might very well decide we need to be ELIMINATED
@wahahn, my friend, most people & even the governments of those countries already know it was an Inside Job. You hear prime ministers, presidents, security agencies come out all the time and say it publicly. The Prime Minister of Japan did, Putin said it, the PM of Australia and most recently the former PM of Italy, who just happens to be the head of European Intelligence. From my world travels, this is common knowledge among regular folk. They, unlike us, can think without patriotism blinders.
@ncdave4life =total Cointelpro disinformation agent. ''He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.'' - Proverbs 18:13
What are the chances of an building burning unequally on different floors to fall down at the excact same moment after hours of burning? This is just so unbelieveably obvious.
shifta187 1 month ago
Didnt donald rumsfeld say on sept 10, 2001 that he was looking into missing $2.3 trillion from pentagon? Hmmm Pentagon and building 7 destroyed where files are kept. lol
jamesgambino 1 month ago
Just what is Geraldo's deal? I don't get him. Why is he such a moustachioed weirdo, is he a Democrat or Republican, who watches him?
MyTotalRemedy 1 month ago
@SovereignStatesman
...and you can go on all day calling me names but it won't make a lick of difference to me, and adds nothing to the discussion.
If it helps you sleep at night to think that anyone who questions what you cling to must be crazy or psycho, that's fine. whatever floats your boat.
ThePassiveFist 3 months ago
Hi! my names' gerald rivers.
derp-de derpde friggin'DER!
jackspectack 4 months ago
9/11 was an inside job. America died that day.....No Justice. No Peace. No Hope. No America....
okturus 4 months ago
Watch "Zero, An Investigation into 9/11 (full documentary), on You Tube.
AwesomeBeatles 5 months ago
Truther Guess what your Wrong The president or Government would not kill there own Close Close Family Freinds In the PENTAGON Air Head... Ther are the Highest of The Highest of the Government CIA NSA Generals . Highest of the Navy all of them are Freinds and Family..Point #. 2 the President does Not, Ever . Ever need permission to wage a war if there is a Threat.. Read the Constatution..so get off the Crack!!
kguitar765 5 months ago
America, you better pay attention now. These murderers want it all. 9-11 was a total inside job. Get a private foreign investigation to conduct this. Watch "Freedom to fascism", on You Tube. No more Congressional investigations.
AwesomeBeatles 6 months ago
The North Wall took over SEVEN SECONDS to collapse.
7 seconds at freefall: 272 meters
Height of building 7: 226 meters
Difference: 46 meters
Result: LESS THAN FREEFALL
SovereignStatesman 6 months ago
@SovereignStatesman
2.25 seconds of freefall at the onset of total collapse. David Chandler proves this in his analysis.
That equates to roughly 8 storeys of structural steel support giving way, across the entire width and depth of the buildings, within miliseconds of each other.
Scientifically speaking, if we observe this fact and formulate multiple hypotheses, starting with the most likely, you will find that Fire-Induced collapse is AT THE BOTTOM of the list.
Guess what's at the top?
ThePassiveFist 3 months ago
@ThePassiveFist
At the top of the building?
A structure which fell before Chandler Chandler says it does, allowing him to nitpick about the time of the onset and claim freefall.
Kinda like those who claim freefall of the Twin Towers 1 and 2, when ejected debris are VISIBLY falling faster.
SovereignStatesman 3 months ago
@SovereignStatesman
I was talking about the top of the list of probable causes... but you've misunderstood, by choice or accident.
you're referring to the penthouse, which did collapse first. happy to admit it. but please don't try to tell me that the interior of the structure disappeared in the intervening seconds and then the 'shell' that was left fell down. that's even more unbelievable than fire induced collapse.
ThePassiveFist 3 months ago
@SovereignStatesman
...and just becasue some in the truth movement say the towers fell at freefall, or that giant space lasers brought them down, or that aliens did it, or there were no planes... doesn't mean we all do. there are nuts on both sides of this discussion, so don't tar me with the same brush and i'll try not to equate you with the retards who believe Bush and Cheney are innocent, decent people.
or that jet fuel can melt steel.
or that the patriot act isn't fascist.
ThePassiveFist 3 months ago
@ThePassiveFist
No, you're all crazy in your own way.
For example, you imply here that steel has to MELT. in order for the building to collapse, and therefore you believe that it retains 100% of its strength until it LIQUIFIES.
In other words, you have NO sense.
As for the Patriot Act, that's more paranoid hysteria and crying wolf, claiming that 9/11 was an inside job as a conspiracy to invade Iraq, and for TSA to feel up people's junk.
Translation: You're 100% PSYCHO!
SovereignStatesman 3 months ago
@SovereignStatesman
You're misrepresenting me again.
Either the steel DID melt, in which case you have to explain HOW, because there is simply no way you can get temperateures HIGH enough to melt the steel in an office fire (even fuelled by jet fuel)
OR the steel did NOT melt but lost structural integrity (which i believe you're arguing for) in which case we still have to explain why there was molten steel found under all three WTC buildings.
EITHER WAY, the official story has a problem.
ThePassiveFist 3 months ago
@ThePassiveFist
"OR the steel did NOT melt but lost structural integrity (which i believe you're arguing for) in which case we still have to explain why there was molten steel found under all three WTC buildings."
That's begging the question, because the molten metal was NEVER tested-- and so to claim that it was "molten steel," is just one more foil-hat crackpot claim.
Try that on someone who HASN'T studied the issue in detail; you might sneak it past them.
SovereignStatesman 3 months ago
@SovereignStatesman
We're going in circles now. the rubble and steel from the WTC was never tested, correct. For what is probably the single biggest crimescene in history, there was little or no testing done. steel girders were shipped off to be recycled and rubble was trucked away without so much as a 'let's store it and analyse it' from anyone. the investigation was a farce. THAT is why we want a new one.
and if it wasn't molten steel... what was it?
THAT'S why we should INVESTIGATE it.
ThePassiveFist 3 months ago
@ThePassiveFist
NO.
YOU are going in circles, and the METAL was never tested--so you CANNOT claim that it was steel.
You are intellectually dishonest.
I ONLY agree with Bill Maher about one thing: TRUTHERS, when he says. "When you see 2 jets slam into 2 buildings and watch them burn for 2 hours, and say 'yeah, if you wanna believe THAT was the cause,' then maybe you should stop asking whether 9/11 was an inside job, and starting asking your doctor whether Paxil is right for YOU."
SovereignStatesman 3 months ago
@SovereignStatesman
Me, Intellectually dishonest? If that came from someone whose opinions i valued, and who had even the smallest shred of credibilty, I might actually be offended.
...But I don't take offense easily, and am all too aware that since you have your blinkers firmly screwed onto the side of your head, puncturing your brain, there is only ever one place you will go - where they point you, where they tell you.
go now, and don't let independent thought get in your way.
ThePassiveFist 3 months ago
@ThePassiveFist
Yeah, now I see what "passive fist" means LOL
I.e. it has your DICK in it!
SovereignStatesman 3 months ago
@ThePassiveFist Pretty simple, the fire could burn hot enough. I'm a blacksmith and I can tell you with just a hair dryer and basic fuel I can make a fire hot enough to melt steel. Now looking at the height of the towers and the amount of air blowing through the gaping hole in the side with a fire burning fueled by jet fuel and everything else in that office....and you got a pretty good forge like setup.
brandonk42 1 month ago
@brandonk42
That is the biggest load of horseshit i have heard in a long time... and I've just been having a debate with a climate change denier, so that's saying something. you can melt steel with a hair dryer and petrol? prove it. i could claim that i can dry up a lake with a hairdryer and number 2 pencil but that does not make it so. show me.
ThePassiveFist 1 month ago
@ThePassiveFist I didn't say Petrol. Maybe learn to read. I said fuel, there's a difference sunshine. And I'm not proving how a forge works. That would entail science which you 911 theorists ignore. I'm not debating this issue because it would be pointless. There is SOOOO much science against you 911 nuts that it is laughable that you ignore it all and stick to your guns. You spew your nonsense and have the audacity to call someone explaining how easy it is to melt steel horseshit. LOL
brandonk42 1 month ago
@brandonk42 And by the way professor, the steel didn't even need to melt. At 1100 degrees it loses 50% of it's strength. (BUT BUT THERE WAS MOLTEN STEEL AT THE BOTTOM!!!) Don't even attempt that horseshit either as that's been debunked 5 times over. (BUT, IT FELL AT FREE FALL SPEED??!?!) Pancaking..look it up because I'm not explaing. Fill the void in your life with something else because your backing a loser on this one.
brandonk42 1 month ago
@ThePassiveFist Wow, I actually took the time to read through your discussion with SovereignStatesman and he's completely hit everything on the head. You can message me back if it makes you feel better but trust me when I say I won't even read them or debate this with you after your plain and simple ignoring of every fact he presented you. Do the world a favor and don't use "scientifically speaking" ever again. You apparently know nothing about it.
brandonk42 1 month ago
The thing about engineers is that they can rarely figure out the obvious-- like in this case it's obvious that the building collapsed from the bottom floor upward, but here he's claiming that it should have happened TOP-DOWN.
Yeah, ok porky, IGNORE the film.
SovereignStatesman 6 months ago
So architects and engineers with NO QUALIFATIONS IN BUILDING-DAMAGE decided to prove that opinions are like assholes: everybody got one, and some butthurt ones are fucked.
SovereignStatesman 6 months ago
Rosie O'Donnel is the DUMBEST FAT FUCK THAT EVER BREATHED AIR.
"The first time in history that fire melted steel."
That's right-- this bitch has never seen a WELDING TORCH!
And she thinks that steel has to MELT in order to weaken it!
WHAT A DUMB CUNT!!!
No WONDER she's against guns, despite having her own army of gun-toting bodyguards!
Fucking hippo-crite.
SovereignStatesman 6 months ago
@ncdave4life both of your links take me nowhere. If you look up "controlled demolition gone wrong" you will see numerous instances where a building has not collapsed at near free-fall speed and not in their own footprint. Once again these are CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS. I am an engineering major and disagree with you along with the other 1300 architects and engineers.
Bsmalls808 7 months ago
The 7 WTC collapse looks odd only because conspiracy nuts use video taken from the undamaged north side, so you can't see the smoke billowing from virtually the entire south side of the building, as it burned out of control. Here's a video they never show you:
youtube(dot)com(slash)watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U
Tall buildings MUST fall at nearly free-fall speed, if they ever fall. The laws of physics require it:
burtonsys(dot)com(slash)staticvdyn
(I was a physics major for 2 yrs b4 switching majors.)
ncdave4life 9 months ago
@ncdave4life = Troll.
You don't even have a real channel ...wth... maybe you are just a disinformation agent, instead of plainly ignorant.
ExamineEvaluate 9 months ago
@ExamineEvaluate Well said. Probably a disinformation agent, you know they have to be out there.
AwesomeBeatles 6 months ago
@ncdave4life = Troll.
It was in smoke...so what! Fire cannot cause free-fall, and I am a nut because I believe in scientific laws like the conservation of momentum, and Newtons laws of motion. Get a life pal...reason always wins out in the end.
ExamineEvaluate 9 months ago
@loejyrrab what we gonna do about it ? Nothing? We all have to get active and do something about it.
laffredo 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Was Geraldo cloned from Colonel Custer's mustache or a Klingon's cling on ?
HeLpLOstGOdAny1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job!
vic3003 1 year ago
the whole thing is a psy-op especially his 'heads up' where he tells you about the 'murderer who taunted the victims famliy' and the bloody mexican scenerio'. Geraldo Riveira didnt come to his senses; this entire piece has nothing to do with the victims fmilies mking headway either. Its a 100% psy-op on the elite's part to start a revolution for THEIR end and your loss.
supplanter111 1 year ago
Yep, our country is screwed. Is there any other way to see America if all of this is true. Other countries aren't innocent, but the other thugs will say about the US when we finally get knocked off, "Hey look at that bigger thug, get him, he made us do our thugging."
bdmenne 1 year ago
Geraldo is punk! hes spin doctor. he came to truck stop 20 years ago and started doing some story about truck drivers. Brought in some college students walking around with there dress up there asses. Geraldo , I havent seen a steel building fall since. Insurance job! Money for the gangsters
spacecop67 1 year ago
Geraldo...talked more then them...what a jerk
arc1342 1 year ago
"Bush Memoirs" Who would buy that except to laugh or get angry?
marinello6 1 year ago
Larry Silverstein revealed this years ago! What is the big surprise? Are people that dense? Our government serves one purpose...to raise Revenue for the privately owned Federal Reserve. Multinational corporations know no patriotism and pay very little in taxes compared to the average person. The whole thing is a fraud anyway.
marinello6 1 year ago
Imagine, being the dad.
Bob Mcilvane...see his speech here on Youtube.
timtak1 1 year ago
Can anybody even tell me if there is any building in the history that fell at free fall speed like a controlled demolition from a fire like building 7??
laffredo 1 year ago 6
@laffredo - Never...That building in China recently burned for three days and is still standing.
wahahn 1 year ago 5
@laffredo I'd be happy to supply you the answer! Helllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Noooooooooooooooooooo! 9/11 was an INSIDE FUCKIN JOB! May the perps burn in hell!
Loejyrrab 11 months ago
Comment removed
ncdave4life 11 months ago
@laffredo, all tall buildings fall at near free-fall speed, if they ever fall at all.
They have to. It's basic Newtonian physics. See:
burtonsys(dot)com(slash)staticvdyn
ncdave4life 11 months ago
@ncdave4life
You clearly have no understanding of Newton of physics. By the way you said near....there was nothing near about wtc7. It was total...and impossible for fire.
ExamineEvaluate 9 months ago
@laffredo NEVER just on 911
sychophantt 5 months ago
911 Being an Inside job is old news. Why are they talking about this now? I knew about this back in 2003.
midtownloft1 1 year ago
@midtownloft1 - Hopefully it's because some of them in the mainstream media outlets are finally waking up, or have grown some balls and just decided to say it. Glenn Beck has been stepping further out over the edge, so to speak, lately too...Finally talking about things that Alex Jones has been outting for the past 10 years...There is a big awakening going on and I think people that have been keeping their mouths shut are finally saying "F-it, it needs to be said"...
wahahn 1 year ago
@wahahn Hope you're right! Thanks.
Loejyrrab 11 months ago
@wahahn Waking up or playing the game to destroy our reputation? Funny how Rupert Murdoch's media starts coming out about 911 especially on Fox News, and then suddenly his media corporation starts collapsing in britain with the phone hacking allegations?
debsco1978 7 months ago
@midtownloft1 - Speak out.....RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE
wahahn 1 year ago
Comment removed
midtownloft1 1 year ago
Does someone still think that FOX isn't fair and balanced? Fox is the on the cutting edge of journalism. Now I know why so many hate and criticize Fox.
TheMehakarp 1 year ago
@TheMehakarp Hannity, O'Reilly, Kilmeade cutting edge? Please!!
DelBluenose80 1 year ago
There's a 20-story building burning in China RIGHT NOW... still no collapse ;(
DigitalCAPS 1 year ago
What's all the SHOCK? These people KNEW 911 was an inside job... they helped SELL IT!
DigitalCAPS 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The tv now says it, so now it must be True! *sarcasm*
SuperTvolley 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Their explaination will be:
Because that building was a command bunker for so many Gov't agencies, we had it pre-wired with demo-explosives when we built it. We had to keep it a secret from the public for security reasons. So....you got us. We now freely admit that it was controlled demolition but it was not for the reasons YOU think. Now go away."
MikeyGonebad 1 year ago
Are you gys ssure Geraldo deserves to be insulted?....I am sure that Fox must have some angle (what that could possibly be is completely beyond me) but Geraldo's covering of this was completely fair...more than fair. Geraldo did a good job...maybe he just wants to be the guy that breaks the story. You know he was the guy that first aired the Zapruder film of Kennedy right?
niverent 1 year ago
@niverent if he was interested in breaking the story, he would have broke it bare minimum 5 years ago, instead he was busy telling 911 truthers to get a life.
drevenkaine 1 year ago
@drevenkaine Another way of looking at it is that Truthers have to use effective ways of communnicating the Truth. Chanting "9/11 was an inside job" is not very effective. Showing WTC7 is very effective. This whole thing shows how effective the Buildingwhat campaign is. Also, don't forget that Geraldo is the only person in the mainstream media to pick this up. You do know Geraldo was the first person to show the Zapruder film on TV don't you?
niverent 1 year ago
@niverent Yes I do know about his showing the Zapruder film. But AE for 911 truth has been talking about building 7 for many years now. Most every 911 truther has used Building 7 as their main show case as to why it was an inside job, or at the very least with help from the inside. You're being overly optimistic. I am right in what I am saying and you will see it soon.
drevenkaine 1 year ago
@drevenkaine I didn't say Geraldo is defintely good...I am just not sure he is evil either. It seems pretty clear FOX must have something up their sleeve (but I cannot for the life of me figure out what that is.) Trust me....I'm as leary about this as the next guy but the fact is that Geraldo is the first to break the story and he did it in an entirely positive light. He even plugged their website. I don't know what to make of this...it's getting interesting though isn't it?
niverent 1 year ago
@niverent MSM has been acting especially crazy as of late. Did you see the clip where MSNBC is saying we need a revolution, then had some leftist commentator on their talking about how you could never get enough Socialism. check out the clip on my channel.
drevenkaine 1 year ago
@drevenkaine, Why don't the "truther" nuts show you this video, of virtually the entire south face of 7 WTC belching smoke?
watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U
ncdave4life 10 months ago
Video of Shanghai skyscraper inferno as 8 killed in China fire
watch?v=nH5-DpMObGc
Hmmm.... A 30-story high-rise engulfed in an inferno and still standing? Someone's pulling my leg. No free-fall collapse. I've seen other buildings fall from smaller fires than what it looks like here. WTC Building Seven, for example. Something smells like bullshit - OLD bullshit.
svord2 1 year ago
@svord2 Now they have to re-open the Oklahoma City Bombing too because a lot did not add up in that tragedy. Do a Google search for the former director of the Los Angeles branch of the FBI by the name "Ted Gunderson" and see his opinion about OKC Bombing. A lot of traitors are in the government that must be brought to justice. And never forget, the sentencing for treason and murder is usually DEATH. Then their next Judgment will come from God Almighty himself.
LoverOfTheBandBoston 1 year ago
patriotsquestion911 com
pavson77 1 year ago
the people calling truthers "whackjobs", and "lunatics"..really arent to blame...they are victims of the slickest propaganda machine the world has ever seen...their ignorance,and self delusion,however have been the reason why we are loosing our rights under the Patriot Act I & II.
krew666666 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@krew666666 They aren't victims.. They are traitors to the Republic.
IAMONEELEVEN 1 year ago
I think that every 911 truther should be able to sue Geraldo for slander for calling them whack jobs. It is obvious to me that there is a terrible purpose for the MSM to be covering this now. They have an ulterior motive, and it has nothing to do with goodness and truth.
drevenkaine 1 year ago 3
@drevenkaine Bravo.
My first thought is simply to get the US into a violent revolution. Cause these brain-amputees calling truthers whack jobs will surely be the first to get violent... - if they figure out what really happened.
empyah 1 year ago
@empyah you may enjoy my most recent video then hook line and sinker
drevenkaine 1 year ago
@drevenkaine i know right? why did he tell the demonstrators to get a life?
BonesDGAF021 8 months ago
If the truth comes out, and 9/11 is determined to have been an attack on the U.S. citizens by our own government to further a political agenda - it may be the end of the U.S. - We may be seen by the world as the most dangerous (which we may be now) but also a ROUGE nation. It would make us a very real target. The EU, Russia, China, etc., might very well decide we need to be ELIMINATED
wahahn 1 year ago
@wahahn, my friend, most people & even the governments of those countries already know it was an Inside Job. You hear prime ministers, presidents, security agencies come out all the time and say it publicly. The Prime Minister of Japan did, Putin said it, the PM of Australia and most recently the former PM of Italy, who just happens to be the head of European Intelligence. From my world travels, this is common knowledge among regular folk. They, unlike us, can think without patriotism blinders.
facebookprogrammer 1 year ago 6
@facebookprogrammer, typical "truther" who cares nothing for the truth. You just make up lies. Shame on you!
None of those people have said such a thing. Only the certifiably insane (like Alex Jones) believe such nonsense.
ncdave4life 11 months ago
@ncdave4life =total Cointelpro disinformation agent. ''He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.'' - Proverbs 18:13
DUSTMIGHTY 10 months ago