@thcia Your a skeptic. He mustve been wearing a lot of padding and a very good costume in the 60/70 to replicate mucle movement, breast muvement and finger movement moving on tough terrian and being 13 feet tall. Go to Willows Creek check it out for your self. Its pretty legit
The suit was made by a company in North Carolina by Phillip Morris. The man wearing the suit was a Native American named Bob Hieronymus wearing football padding and helmet. The arms were lengthened with extensions. The technology existed at the time for making convincing looking ape costumes (2001; and many TV shows of the late 60's).
The footage was shot at a distance and the camera shaken so as not to expose the details of the suit and to make it look more authentic.
@rockstarzep It looks like a man in a gorilla suit to me. I remember seeing pretty convincing gorilla suits when I was younger on 60's era TV shows. All it takes is money and some imagination.
@rockstarzep Dream on! The actors who portrayed the Australipithicenes in 2001 were dancers. Very nimble and thin. The gentleman who portrayed the Sasquatch was wearing a football helmet and padding. The footprints cast by Patterson and Gimlin were obvious fakes. When someone bags a specimen and is confirmed by reputable scientists, then I'll believe.
@thcia There is various DNA samples, good video, audio, and other things to be released soon by researchers. See Sasquatch the Quest, and Ketchum DNA analysis. Some very believable bigfoot researchers are involved in some way but are prohibited to speak about it at this point in time.
@thcia Philip Morris? The same company that has nothing resembling this suit for sale today, never mind in 1967..?? The ape-men in 2001 had NO padding in the suits...they were lycra with hairs tied onto them...this has NOTHING to do with a heavily padded suit..if Morris made the suit, let me ask you ONE question...WHY can't they make ANOTHER just like it?? Why??
este video me pone los pelos de punta, es un video q cuantas mas veces lo ves mas dices,..no puede ser, te pasa lo contrario q con otras grabaciones , q dices bnopue ser esto o lo otro. Se ven los musculos marcadisimos, por la estatura, y esos musculos tendria que ser algun culturista muy grande de la epoca, por ejemplo Sergio Oliva, pero este no era ni la mitad de alto q este. Para mi cada vez que lo veo es el bigfoot, realmente existe.
Yep, you Bigfoot deniers will believe any old crap. lol For those willing and ready to learn, it's already been well-established the PGF is no hoax. She walks, looks and behaves precisely as witnesses say and you'd expect anyway from such a being. They still can't make a suit looking like this, watch any old monster crap on TV and see for yourself how poorly Bigfoot costumes have always been. And above all; how anatomically incorrect they are, basically, only all too human and fake. Unlike PGF.
The company that produced this video "Vision Realm ENTERTAINMENT". That says it all. PAY ATTENTION. I'm going to make a video with a gait analysis of a tooth pick man in Robot Chicken fashion and see how many people claim it to be "Scientific Evidence". When people want to believe they will accept anything as evidence.
They would make more money off the fake suit than anything else. Imagine if that costume surfaced today, the price on that sucker? My guess would be $10 million
@XBattleDude Yeah but what are the sources you have been reading? It's not enough just to say "I've been reading." Just because something's in a book doesn't make it valid.
And all those "good people" have gotten a great deal of attention which lonely people often desire.
@XBattleDude Please open your mind and use your brain trust me when i say if there was a big foot out there there would be a body and bones found, do you know how much one person could make if they found a body. You mean to tell me with all the humans in the jungles all over the world studying different animals that they never saw a big foot? Never was able to catch one on film, but just this? Trust me with all the digging and all the findings they have found they would of found a big foot,
Dr. Melba Ketchum update: I thought we would be finished in a few weeks, but instead, Sasquatch threw us curve balls even with their DNA which can be as elusive as they are.We are past that! As a result, we have assembled a renowned team, each of us with our own specialties to make this project "extraordinary".If everyone will hang in there, I promise it will be worth the wait. We have the proof, now just give us the opportunity to present it in a form that will even convince skeptics.
You still believe that Phillip Morris made the "suit" after he showed off his piece of crap duplication to KIMA-29 that looks NOTHING like "Patty"? And Patterson didn't just immediately see/film "Patty". They were there for 3 weeks and "she" was spotted on their 2nd to last day at Bluff Creek.
he intended to make a big foot film--then rented a very good camera and happened to immediately walk into one.. a little too lucky. especially because he went to the wilson area--who later confessed about his doing of the tracks and that he felt sorry for RP but he said the film --he didnt have anything to do with it..
Certainly many people have gone looking, but few stay out there for the time it sometimes takes. Roger/Bob were out there a week or so before they ran into Patty, you can't expect to find anything on a single day trip, no matter how large your group is. These hairy folks will know you're there regardless, so going out in large numbers probably will yield very little result. Yes Roger's the man, he got the most important piece of footage ever. Now realize at 7ft it can't be faked due to anatomy.
Today's technology, retroll? This was 1967. What great number of people, the wilderness of America is a huge and vast place, many enormous and isolated places where no 'greater number of people' ever go. You're confusing the PNW with all the lights of downtown Manhattan.
Yes, fair enough indeed retroll, and exactly what I've said all the time. lol Roger wasn't a conman either, he's the luckiest cameraman ever when he filmed a real Sasquatch. Scientists from around the world agree, from America to Russia, this is the real thing and it's impossible to fake. If it wasn't and cheap suits would do, we'd probably seen something similar done. But we never did, nor will we ever. Now, that fact alone isn't entirely unimportant either.
It's real, don;t ask me how I know you'll think I'm crazy- it's just real. I just wish with all my heart we could find him and put all you hoaxers and non believers to bed .
@retrobloke78 you can think its a hoax if you want,the pg film has never been proven a hoax,bigfooters like myself also have to admit it was never proven real.i think the pg film is real but i would never claim i could prove it 100%,all footers can do is show how unlikely it is to be a hoax.
i have tried to wak like this creature for over 10 years and cant get it right,the body leans forward the knees never lock and the foot raises higher than a modern human.
@SuperTestfreak It's ok, Bob Hearsayimanass has tried unsuccessfully, too. The problem is that he locks his knees, can't develop his legs like a Sasquatch, can't move his face around like a Sasquatch, can't turn like Sasquatch, and can't seem to change the aspect ratio of his arms to legs or elbow to arm. His foot stepping dynamics can't produce the same dynamic footprint of Sasquatch and the aspect ratio of his toes to foot and width to length of his foot can't match Sasquatch's either.
@retrobloke78 The same scientific community that accepts the past existence of a likely bi-pedal 10ft tall ape that lived side by side with humans for 10,000 years. The same community that has discovered new species of great apes in the 1900's (mountain gorillas, bonobo), in 2008 found 125,000 undiscovered western gorillas, 18 new species of primates since 2000, once believed in the static Universe, vitalism, cold fusion, and still believes in global warming. WHAT THE FUCK'S YOUR POINT?
@PrairieDon1021 I myself accidentally made a few fossil discoveries. Imagine what's out there. I also made geologic discoveries from a lot of hard work in areas that were previously studied, but not intensely enough apparently. Sometimes it takes one or the other- hard work or luck to make a discovery.
@PrairieDon1021 Very true. However, consider this: Sasquatch would be the only species in the US (aside from marine life and perhaps some species of birds) that's never had a run-in with a motor vehicle. How is that possible, when the creature is supposedly living in areas surrounded by highways and thruways? Even humans get hit, despite knowing the dangers of roads and motor vehicles. Seems to me that we should hear of at least one road accident per yr in a healthy breeding population.
@retrobloke78 What's sad is people like you who convince themselves theyre smart as they do nothing but spew negativity and ignorant bullshit. "..a man in a bad costume.." really you dumb fuck? Let's say it is a man in a costume, it wouldn't be a bad one. in fact, it would be the greatest costume the worlds ever seen! Seeing as how all credible film industry and scientific analysis of the footage shows it would allow the man inside to violate the biomechanics of the human musculoskeletal system
funny thing about this video the big foot knew paterson was there thay are clam creatures avoiding contact with the humen race thay know our distructive natures by hunting seeing us kill anamals in the wild, thay sit and watch us,
There's no changing story here, retroller, only your versions change. Patty's female and 7ft, the males are bigger. You really know very little about this, don't you? lol
Then go away, retroll, you're not changing anybody's mind with your spam. Only liar here is you, to yourself most of all. Patty's 7ft not 8ft, by the way.
Your trolling has no effect, retolller. You should worry more about yourself, why you spend so much time worrying about what other people think, I'd worry about my sanity were I you.
Wrong retroll, now you're talking about your own style. I merely refer people to the expert word of researchers and let folks make up their own minds, and so they have in large numbers in favor of PGF's autheticity as Bigfoot evidence. Especially after watching the AP Bigfoot episode most people have little doubt left, and your hoax battle largely a lost case. You babbling here daily actually only helps the Bigfoot cause, revealing your spam 'n' spoof.
There's no changed story, retroll. Most reports say there's no attack, well pretty much all of them I guess, the fear thing is on the part of the witness as the encounter happens.
Wow....Actually, you can see her look back at BOTH MEN. First she looks at the person to the side and rear of her back, AND , the she looks 30-40degrees TO HER FORWARD as you might do yourself. You would want to "look' at your persuers....SHE SPOTS 2 DIFFERENT 'TARGETS'. RIGHT???
Reptiles, so. You really prefer to refuse logic, don'tcha. lol BF's a primate, but if you want to run up to one if you're ever that lucky, be my guest. Patterson did yes, simply because of the old belief it's just an ape of sorts, plus fewer reports in those days. You're simply not considering the situation, deliberately of course, your mental block won't let you coming from your cultural upbringing so you can't help it. I won't go into stupid discussions with you retroll, why this and why that.
Not so fast, retroll... You can't follow tracks...when they aren't there all of them... Besides, who's gonna do that anyway? Know of such a posse? Nobody's spent enough time out there to get really close, the weekend researcher won't walk up to a Sasquatch and ask for a photograph. Most people seeing one get spooked pretty bad, the Sasquatch retreats and so will the witness, so it's very easy to sit here and just say follow it. Even you wouldn't...especially not you, hahaha.
No, retro. Not all tracks can be faked, and once again you overlook the explanations and only bake on your own, just told you an example below... -The reason you blindly assume they can, is because we haven't found the beings making them. You're quite the comedian, you know.
But it's a good theory, isn't it? ;-p Tracks are some of the best proof, many showing signs of real foot movement and sinking too deep into the ground for a person to do it, or to have dragged some heavy machinery into the wilderness for it...with no guarantee they'll ever be found before wind and weather mess up everything. Skeptics don't like the idea one got caught on camera here, dreaming it's rather f/x and preferring to be fooled by Patty... Told you they were smart beings, these Bigfoots.
I wouldn't be pushing the Bob Heironimus thing if I were a skeptic. The chatter doesn't add up, the enactment in a monkey suit doesn't add up, the claimed suit is totally a joke, and a really careful observation of this film shows that there's no way in hell its Bob with the muscle existence, muscle movement, subtle breast movement, facial movement 2:56 AND 2:57, nonlocking knees and other dynamics, proportions, etc. Seriously, pause the thin-face she makes at 2:57 and say "Bob????????"
You need to look at all the circumstances leading up to them "catching" a Bigfoot on tape and then decide if you think it's real. There's a lot going on about this little piece of film that most people don't know. YT PGF the final word as an example
@Nickalispicalis also, check out the 2 apelike facial expressions at 2:56 and 2:57. That's a hell of a flexible "mask" or else the "person" in the suit isn't afraid to show the separate, mechanical device powering the face. And something else is powering the herniated muscle in the bigfoot evidentce analysis video....real.
@retrobloke78 I am bored with owning you, you gargantuan slack jawed dullard....I will delete further posts without even reading them...you are a simpleton...
"Show me a gorilla with an abnormal hunchback" Jesus...could this guy BE any dumber...???..Gorillas have huge traps like the Patterson subject... it's not a 'hunchback' idiot...tell us all ONE more time how NO primate has a line up their back..ONE more time!!?? Please!!??
You have been like a retarded chatty Kathy repeating over and over that NO primtates have a line down their backs...So I PROVED to you that gorillas DO have a line down their backs...didn't I moron?? Keep spouting off on how they DON'T halfwit...and NO...gorillas and chimps DON'T have large buttocks because they aren't BIPEDS...like I said..it's nasty of me to KEEP making fun of someone who is mentally challenged....ever get tired of being WRONG??
I've had EVERY skeptic from Emintardo to retroidiot tell me that there is NO line up a primates back like the one seen in the Patterson footage...google "Gorillas back'...well...behold!! The first, FIRST, I say FIRST image is a gorilla with a line up his back...(it's where all of the back muscle adhere)..I guess Janos Prohaska made that lowlanfd gorilla too...
Another eminaz.... They're smart enough to hide their tracks perhaps, seeing how we seem to be interested in them... These obviously are hominid of some kind. The reason we have dino bones at all, is because the ground some of them were preserved in happened to be ideal for it. Otherwise they'd all been gone millions of years ago, like most other dino bones. The soil in the PNW for instance, is not very good for preserving bones and thus we hardly ever find any or many dead animals at all.
Do native americans have stories/legends about these...that should be a clue to their possible existence...also, they would be the best to track them as they could track a heavy animal surely...why only limited footprints...they wouldn't be trying to hide them so where is evidence of continuous prints in mud for instance...I think these aren't real...if they ever were then there is so little to suggest...we have alot of hominid evidence and dinosaur bones but no yeti/bigfoot clues
@retrobloke78 They are always one step ahead of a human- it is their survival instinct. There has been a pattern of sasquatches being spotted (or footprints/evidence) in clusters or regions. No use arguing if you don't believe. Upcoming DNA evidence and clear new video may not be sufficient.
Yup, they all look real laughable those cheap costumes and actually prove it was not possible to fake BF realistically due to human anatomy, & the apparent ignorance/indifference on the part of f/x specialists. Tall lanky human shaped dudes in undefined longhaired suits, fine for monster flicks but fooling us they can not. That, coupled with modern HD technology, will put an end to all the fake ones and seal good PGF-like footage conclusively real. That's what we're all hoping to see eventually.
Patterson did find other footprints (all similar) before the Bluff Creek filming. Footprints had been spotted in the area, so that was why he went there. He got lucky.
This is not a fake. It is genuine footage of a man in a padded fur suit. That is an important distinction. Fake would imply that the images had been manipulated in some way. This is genuine unaltered film footage of a paid actor who Patterson had walk along the creek bed while he filmed it. The costume had been created for the film that Patterson planned to gain finance for and produce. Presenting it as documentary evidence of a "Bigfoot" makes it a hoax ...not a fake. :|
You couldn't be more wrong. It's not a costume and doesn't look like any costume either from those days or today. If you think it does then please provide an example.
@LaughingGravy31: The one in the PGF clip is my example right there in front of us. A problem with the believers ridiculing the quality of other costumes is that they are all shown with detail from close examination whereas the costume in PGF is on grainy blurred film from about 100 feet distance, yet the believers insist the detail is outstanding. PGF is a Morris suit and the Wah Chang mask in my opinion. Patterson himself is reason enough to be suspicious of the PGF clip.
@LaughingGravy31: We know that many suits were made in the 50's & 60's for films and entertainers. It is not my fault that there isn't many photo's of them available. Padding under the outer costume with shoulder pads. This looks like it could be similar to the monkey suit from the lost in space episode. I'm puzzled why BF believers have such faith in PGF, 'cos even if PGF is proved fake that doesn't disprove the existence of BF. Nobody likes being lied to and I think RP was hoaxing us all.
There are plenty of films from AFTER the PGF from the 1970s that tried to get people in bigfoot suits. Again, none of them look anywhere near as convincing as the PGF film.
Even Rick Baker's King Kong 1976 has baggy legs, massive head for the body and regular length arms etc.
If you accept that the PGF was a hoax then you have to accept that Roger Patterson was light years ahead of Hollywood when it comes to bipedal ape suits.
@digglyda I`m definitely on the sceptical side of this argument,I think Patterson took his secrets to his grave.compared to other "BF" films it is a masterful fake,maybe he just got lucky it turned out so well.One thing intrigues me though,why go to the extra trouble,and expense,of making breasts for the "creature",it seems a strange extra complication to the hoax..Whatever the truth its either a great hoax or the most important wildlife film in history.
Snowbeast, Creature From Black Lake, Legend of Boggy Creek, Six Million Dollar Man, The Mysterious Monsters, Man or Beast, Sasquatch The Legend of Bigfoot etc etc were all filmed in the 1970s and had men in bigfoot type costumes. Not one of them comes anywhere near to what we seen in the Patterson film. They all look hoakey, even when seen at a distance and obscured in trees etc.
Most people are fat, slow, dimwitted, uninspired, nonbelieving, and unable to catch a bigfoot. The main problem has been the lack of people in the field trying to come in contact with limited numbers of sasquatch. The doubters are definately going down the wrong street and setting themselves up for humiliation. Not all the accounts are hoaxes and mistakes. Not all discoverers of footprints, etc are fraud.
An intelligent species not wanting to be found, why is that pathetic... No, it's smart behavior. The dummy is the human race, scared and not well enough equipped mentally...technically we're just getting there. So hold on for the ride. Or not. Your choice.
well if you would go camping in the spot this was filmed it not only takes a while to get to but at night you will hear and just feel like someone is watching you try it for yourself before you say anything bad about this video
SeeYTvid:Thedocumentary "Sasquatch: the Quest" is part ofthe Erickson Project and will unveil, for the first time, a host of never before seen sasquatch footage and other evidence chronicling the journey of the Erickson Project.The release of thedocumentarywillcoincidewiththereleaseof theDNAfindingscollaboratively withDr.Melba KetchumThey are very close to completion,but there is no exact time on when it will be done.Author is confident it will be worth the wait as the data is very complete
@psycologicalicon IF it was faked (and im not saying it was or wasnt) do you think they would have put boobs on it and muscle definition but left their shoes on? Come on now.
What IS going on with the face stretching at 2:56 and then at 2:57?Every hair must have been glued to her face as stated in the bigfoot sasquatch evidence video.You can see the facial muscles and the narrowness of the face at the second apelike behavioral gesture at 2:57.That was a heck of a risk to take if you want to pull off a hoax.And which one of the MANY "he said, she said" confusing, contradicting stories is correct about this incredibly deeply analyzed film?I'll go with the side of pHDs.
They forgot one key component in the animation. The hips move up and down. They stay in the same location of the body which makes the walk look funny. When a person walks their hips rise and fall with the motion.
The climate in Florida, most if not all primate experts agree, is just about ideal for apes. Now, whether or not any skunk apes live there is the question.
I dont see why it's so hard to believe that there might be a form of advanced ape species that we haven't discovered yet... if you really think about it, it would be a North American ape or USA & Canada, instead of like a South American ape of the Amazons or African Ape of the Congo and such. It's not an impossibility. Stranger things exist in the universe my friends.
@biggee316 I don't think its tough to believe a big ape exists in the north americas, I think it's more the ignorance of it and lack of DNA evidence, although there was once evidence found of an ape speices that differed from human DNA and was close to chimp DNA.
BF has learned to hide well as a SURVIVAL MECHANISM.We DO have some fossil teeth if he is related to Gigantapithecus.We DO have video-this video is real-you can see the mass @1:33 and the herniated muscle.A large animal will be designed to not lock the knees as seen in the walk.Scientific evidence of bigfoot includes flexible footprints with dermal ridges, footprint size natural distribution, hair, scat, vocalizations, behavior signatures(broken trees, etc)& video.They're living under our noses!
0:10 how hard is it to hold a camera steady.... thats the only reason I think its fake. If someone can show me a good view of him im 100 percent willing to believe.
@samny631 I believe patterson was on horse back while filming then he dismounts and runs across the creek. indicated by all the movement of the camera
@OU8121ST What was the horse doing?Did he buck,is there a whoa,whoa,since the horse would see the BF,too.I thought animals could sense danger,even if the horse thought BF,was a bear.
@samny631 well you have to consider this is the 60's cameras weren't the point and click wonders we all have these days. he would have been fumbling with this clunky peace of shit video camera. plus you also have to consider when you see something shocking its hard to keep your composure so you might shake or tremble in the arms and legs
@samny631 keep in mind that the man taking the footage is on horseback.... I believe that the horse reacted BEFORE Patterson saw the creature - so initially he is filming the creature while mounted on a horse that has been spooked.....
@samny631 Its not a fake, If anything a steady camera would point more towards a fake. Listen, no human being can walk the way this thing did. They have tried repeatedly to duplicate it and failed miserably.
Wrong emin, there's not a single thing on her body that points to it being fake, in fact it all points to it being real. You'd be thrown out of court so fast if you came in there saying it's a costume, primatilogists have shown it's likely real.
the whole subject of this film has been done to death its the huge fake feet that makes the bent knee walk just like wearing skis or flippers the evidence for this film being fake is strong enough to hold up in court it was part of a documentary that has been kept hidden theres loads on here about it but bigfoot itself is unproven at best
We've thought about it for more than a minute, which is why anyone not smart enough to see it's no suit is in fact the delusional part. The world is still a young place or human history is anyway. And our technological advances are like yesterday only, which is another delusional part to think we'd cracked this yet. In fact it all speaks against us having done so yet; not enough severe searching for one thing and an intelligent scary species, you do the math. Seriously. Tide's about to change...
Okay, I'll humor you for a second. Lets say that its real. Why has there been no bodies found, no scientifically accepted photographic (or other media) evidence , not a single bigfoot ever found. One of the men present even admitted it was him yet you STILL cant accept it.
Anyone who believes in this is delusional. Its human nature to want there to be MORE to life , sure - but think about it for one minute.
@cullyvan There has been scientifically accepted evidence. DNA analysis was performed on suspected Bigfoot fecal matter and hair. The results showed that the DNA was from a previously unidentified primordial species. Also fingerprint analysis has been performed from footprint castings, the data consistently shows that there does exist some kind of primate unique to any we have studied in the past. And to dispute your claims about finding animal remains, it is a natural instinct of all animal
st o go somewhere very isolated when they vulnerable or dying. Bodies usually decomposed in weeks and are absorbed back into the environment. Ask any wildlife worker or park ranger etc how often they discover remains of wildlife that have died naturally. Be logical for a second, do you really think there would be thousands of sightings and other forms of evidence if this was all some elaborate conspiracy. Sure there are the nefarious who undermine the integrity of this argument with lucrativ
@michaeljcoles lucrative agendas, but i think its ignorant to look at something this compelling and immediately disclaim "FAKE"! The world is a crazy place filled with sometimes inconceivable phenomenons but all you disbelievers with be faced with a big hairy surprise someday.
@michaeljcoles Michael , there HASN'T . I don't know where you are getting this information, probably from some cooky book but its certainly not accepted in the serious scientific community. I would love for Bigfoot to be real but you have to seperate the heart from the head. Its unlikely , lets face it. There are Blue Whales and Gorillas. Both magnificent creatures, go enjoy them,
@michaeljcoles I'm sorry Michael, I dont watch the History channel or discovery as - to be perfectly frank with you - they are complete shit. Good luck all the same.
@michaeljcoles could you give a reference. if there was indeed unequivocal DNA evidence the debate would be over. last i heard it was still on. i think there is sufficient evidence to warrant scientific investigation. i hate it when naysayers present untrue data. i equally hate it when believers distort the truth.
@cullyvan "One of the men present even admitted it was him yet you STILL cant accept it." Err, when you're attempting to be as condescending as possible, it really helps not to completely lie. Otherwise you just end up making a moron out of yourself, oddly enough.
The question remains - if it was a guy in a suit (a guy that the horses already knew) then why did his horse rear up and throw him.
Why - b/c it was an animal that the horse feared.
- and for all those non-believers - explain the thousands of footprints all over the US. These creatures have evolve to be nocturnal, while man is primary diurnal.
Well, luckily it is real as the bodily evidence of Patty points to. Had it been a fake with some 6ft guy in a suit, it'd actually have to be even taller since her torso's longer than a human's. We see all of her legs and hip area, so nothing's covered up there, meaning her top's too tall to reach. Arms set so high, and wide swinging from the top of shoulders. It all fits if you know the physical history of these beings' ape anatomy, those not in the know are the ones still thinking it's a suit.
@retrobloke78 What man do you know could fill a "suit" as seen in this video? You should check out the serious scientific analyses of this footage instead of paying attention to shoot-from-the-hip so-called debunkers who operate from the assumption that because they don't believe Bigfoot exists, therefore the film must be fake. A good place to start is the website of the BFRO.
I appreciate the video and information, but man this song sucks so bad. Sorry if this is the uploaders band or whatever. Oh, just saw it was Jethro Tull. There's a reason I didn't buy that album. Wow, what a shitty song by them. Great band, but that was a turd.
Honestly, if you really saw bigfoot, and had a camera with you, wouldn't you try to follow it at a safe distance? This film is just too suspicious. Looks too good to be true
@joeyvader Yea but in the heat of the moment, most Bigfoot enthusiasts wouldn't be thinking rationally, and would in fact follow it for a lot longer, which is why I highly doubt this video is authentic.
@2pacalypse9 But it IS true, so put aside your professional skepticism for a minute, and listen to what scientists, who have taken the time to view this footage with an open mind and scientific curiosity, say about it. Check out the website for the BFRO, for starters.
@rtea129 who's 13 feet tall? Not patty...
JoshNortonalias 1 day ago
@19nisey69 Its on an indian resv. Im not sure with the law but were not supposed to be on those. Unless your a native american
RTEA129 6 days ago
@thcia Your a skeptic. He mustve been wearing a lot of padding and a very good costume in the 60/70 to replicate mucle movement, breast muvement and finger movement moving on tough terrian and being 13 feet tall. Go to Willows Creek check it out for your self. Its pretty legit
RTEA129 6 days ago
The suit was made by a company in North Carolina by Phillip Morris. The man wearing the suit was a Native American named Bob Hieronymus wearing football padding and helmet. The arms were lengthened with extensions. The technology existed at the time for making convincing looking ape costumes (2001; and many TV shows of the late 60's).
The footage was shot at a distance and the camera shaken so as not to expose the details of the suit and to make it look more authentic.
thcia 1 month ago
@thcia how did they get the muscles to move below the "padded" suit? See bigfoot sasquatch evidence video when the researchers discuss this.
rockstarzep 1 month ago
@rockstarzep It looks like a man in a gorilla suit to me. I remember seeing pretty convincing gorilla suits when I was younger on 60's era TV shows. All it takes is money and some imagination.
thcia 3 weeks ago
@thcia Just ask Bob H. He needs money and solves the imagination part by fooling most of the public.
rockstarzep 3 weeks ago
@rockstarzep Dream on! The actors who portrayed the Australipithicenes in 2001 were dancers. Very nimble and thin. The gentleman who portrayed the Sasquatch was wearing a football helmet and padding. The footprints cast by Patterson and Gimlin were obvious fakes. When someone bags a specimen and is confirmed by reputable scientists, then I'll believe.
thcia 3 weeks ago
@thcia There is various DNA samples, good video, audio, and other things to be released soon by researchers. See Sasquatch the Quest, and Ketchum DNA analysis. Some very believable bigfoot researchers are involved in some way but are prohibited to speak about it at this point in time.
rockstarzep 3 weeks ago
@rockstarzep What a laugh! Prohibited huh?
19nisey69 2 weeks ago
@thcia Philip Morris? The same company that has nothing resembling this suit for sale today, never mind in 1967..?? The ape-men in 2001 had NO padding in the suits...they were lycra with hairs tied onto them...this has NOTHING to do with a heavily padded suit..if Morris made the suit, let me ask you ONE question...WHY can't they make ANOTHER just like it?? Why??
joeyvader 3 weeks ago
Does the Wah mask move quickly in emotional expressions such as the two at 2:56 and 2:57?
rockstarzep 1 month ago
Whoever animated that skeleton did a shitty job. It had nothing to do with the shape or movements of the person/animal in the video...
GhostyFilms 1 month ago
mala suerte que no llevara una HD, jejeje...seguro q tb hubieran dudado.
Ofledius 2 months ago
este video me pone los pelos de punta, es un video q cuantas mas veces lo ves mas dices,..no puede ser, te pasa lo contrario q con otras grabaciones , q dices bnopue ser esto o lo otro. Se ven los musculos marcadisimos, por la estatura, y esos musculos tendria que ser algun culturista muy grande de la epoca, por ejemplo Sergio Oliva, pero este no era ni la mitad de alto q este. Para mi cada vez que lo veo es el bigfoot, realmente existe.
Ofledius 2 months ago
Yep, you Bigfoot deniers will believe any old crap. lol For those willing and ready to learn, it's already been well-established the PGF is no hoax. She walks, looks and behaves precisely as witnesses say and you'd expect anyway from such a being. They still can't make a suit looking like this, watch any old monster crap on TV and see for yourself how poorly Bigfoot costumes have always been. And above all; how anatomically incorrect they are, basically, only all too human and fake. Unlike PGF.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
The company that produced this video "Vision Realm ENTERTAINMENT". That says it all. PAY ATTENTION. I'm going to make a video with a gait analysis of a tooth pick man in Robot Chicken fashion and see how many people claim it to be "Scientific Evidence". When people want to believe they will accept anything as evidence.
ffmcmav40 3 months ago
They would make more money off the fake suit than anything else. Imagine if that costume surfaced today, the price on that sucker? My guess would be $10 million
liondoghound 3 months ago
@XBattleDude Yeah but what are the sources you have been reading? It's not enough just to say "I've been reading." Just because something's in a book doesn't make it valid.
And all those "good people" have gotten a great deal of attention which lonely people often desire.
NeverDoubt1 3 months ago
@XBattleDude Please open your mind and use your brain trust me when i say if there was a big foot out there there would be a body and bones found, do you know how much one person could make if they found a body. You mean to tell me with all the humans in the jungles all over the world studying different animals that they never saw a big foot? Never was able to catch one on film, but just this? Trust me with all the digging and all the findings they have found they would of found a big foot,
blackstersherron 3 months ago
@XBattleDude The bottom of it's feet are what get me. They look completely fake. Snow White.
Luigi84289 3 months ago
@Luigi84289 it was on a sand bar after a flood occurred in Northern California, What your seeing is sand stuck to the bottom.
JCeiver612 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr. Melba Ketchum update: I thought we would be finished in a few weeks, but instead, Sasquatch threw us curve balls even with their DNA which can be as elusive as they are.We are past that! As a result, we have assembled a renowned team, each of us with our own specialties to make this project "extraordinary".If everyone will hang in there, I promise it will be worth the wait. We have the proof, now just give us the opportunity to present it in a form that will even convince skeptics.
rockstarzep 3 months ago
this video is fuckin dumnb.
Dorman321 3 months ago
You still believe that Phillip Morris made the "suit" after he showed off his piece of crap duplication to KIMA-29 that looks NOTHING like "Patty"? And Patterson didn't just immediately see/film "Patty". They were there for 3 weeks and "she" was spotted on their 2nd to last day at Bluff Creek.
GhostofDuma 4 months ago
he intended to make a big foot film--then rented a very good camera and happened to immediately walk into one.. a little too lucky. especially because he went to the wilson area--who later confessed about his doing of the tracks and that he felt sorry for RP but he said the film --he didnt have anything to do with it..
KeyWestBluesX 4 months ago
Comment removed
KeyWestBluesX 4 months ago
thats bigfoot!
SuperTestfreak 4 months ago
Certainly many people have gone looking, but few stay out there for the time it sometimes takes. Roger/Bob were out there a week or so before they ran into Patty, you can't expect to find anything on a single day trip, no matter how large your group is. These hairy folks will know you're there regardless, so going out in large numbers probably will yield very little result. Yes Roger's the man, he got the most important piece of footage ever. Now realize at 7ft it can't be faked due to anatomy.
reclaimerReclaimer 4 months ago
Today's technology, retroll? This was 1967. What great number of people, the wilderness of America is a huge and vast place, many enormous and isolated places where no 'greater number of people' ever go. You're confusing the PNW with all the lights of downtown Manhattan.
reclaimerReclaimer 4 months ago
Yes, fair enough indeed retroll, and exactly what I've said all the time. lol Roger wasn't a conman either, he's the luckiest cameraman ever when he filmed a real Sasquatch. Scientists from around the world agree, from America to Russia, this is the real thing and it's impossible to fake. If it wasn't and cheap suits would do, we'd probably seen something similar done. But we never did, nor will we ever. Now, that fact alone isn't entirely unimportant either.
reclaimerReclaimer 4 months ago
It's real, don;t ask me how I know you'll think I'm crazy- it's just real. I just wish with all my heart we could find him and put all you hoaxers and non believers to bed .
tenodogblu 4 months ago
@retrobloke78 you can think its a hoax if you want,the pg film has never been proven a hoax,bigfooters like myself also have to admit it was never proven real.i think the pg film is real but i would never claim i could prove it 100%,all footers can do is show how unlikely it is to be a hoax.
SuperTestfreak 4 months ago
@retrobloke78 i didnt count the hours, but i would try the walk from time to time
SuperTestfreak 4 months ago
@retrobloke78 the patterson film has no suit in it,bank on it.
SuperTestfreak 4 months ago
i have tried to wak like this creature for over 10 years and cant get it right,the body leans forward the knees never lock and the foot raises higher than a modern human.
SuperTestfreak 4 months ago
@SuperTestfreak It's ok, Bob Hearsayimanass has tried unsuccessfully, too. The problem is that he locks his knees, can't develop his legs like a Sasquatch, can't move his face around like a Sasquatch, can't turn like Sasquatch, and can't seem to change the aspect ratio of his arms to legs or elbow to arm. His foot stepping dynamics can't produce the same dynamic footprint of Sasquatch and the aspect ratio of his toes to foot and width to length of his foot can't match Sasquatch's either.
rockstarzep 4 months ago
@rockstarzep i am into bodybuilding and can only wish to have the huge muscle mass of the patterson creature lol
SuperTestfreak 4 months ago
@retrobloke78 The same scientific community that accepts the past existence of a likely bi-pedal 10ft tall ape that lived side by side with humans for 10,000 years. The same community that has discovered new species of great apes in the 1900's (mountain gorillas, bonobo), in 2008 found 125,000 undiscovered western gorillas, 18 new species of primates since 2000, once believed in the static Universe, vitalism, cold fusion, and still believes in global warming. WHAT THE FUCK'S YOUR POINT?
PrairieDon1021 4 months ago
@PrairieDon1021 I myself accidentally made a few fossil discoveries. Imagine what's out there. I also made geologic discoveries from a lot of hard work in areas that were previously studied, but not intensely enough apparently. Sometimes it takes one or the other- hard work or luck to make a discovery.
rockstarzep 4 months ago
@PrairieDon1021 Very true. However, consider this: Sasquatch would be the only species in the US (aside from marine life and perhaps some species of birds) that's never had a run-in with a motor vehicle. How is that possible, when the creature is supposedly living in areas surrounded by highways and thruways? Even humans get hit, despite knowing the dangers of roads and motor vehicles. Seems to me that we should hear of at least one road accident per yr in a healthy breeding population.
ritter89 4 months ago
@retrobloke78 What's sad is people like you who convince themselves theyre smart as they do nothing but spew negativity and ignorant bullshit. "..a man in a bad costume.." really you dumb fuck? Let's say it is a man in a costume, it wouldn't be a bad one. in fact, it would be the greatest costume the worlds ever seen! Seeing as how all credible film industry and scientific analysis of the footage shows it would allow the man inside to violate the biomechanics of the human musculoskeletal system
PrairieDon1021 4 months ago
What do you know and how do you know it, retroll.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
funny thing about this video the big foot knew paterson was there thay are clam creatures avoiding contact with the humen race thay know our distructive natures by hunting seeing us kill anamals in the wild, thay sit and watch us,
david1513 5 months ago
There's no changing story here, retroller, only your versions change. Patty's female and 7ft, the males are bigger. You really know very little about this, don't you? lol
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
Then go away, retroll, you're not changing anybody's mind with your spam. Only liar here is you, to yourself most of all. Patty's 7ft not 8ft, by the way.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
Your trolling has no effect, retolller. You should worry more about yourself, why you spend so much time worrying about what other people think, I'd worry about my sanity were I you.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
Wrong retroll, now you're talking about your own style. I merely refer people to the expert word of researchers and let folks make up their own minds, and so they have in large numbers in favor of PGF's autheticity as Bigfoot evidence. Especially after watching the AP Bigfoot episode most people have little doubt left, and your hoax battle largely a lost case. You babbling here daily actually only helps the Bigfoot cause, revealing your spam 'n' spoof.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
I admit nada so your posts make no sense, retroll. Not the first or last time, hehe.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
Huh, retroll. We all know there's no reports of attacks, except those you make up. And the male Sasquatch is 8ft not their women, bah.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
oooo, bigfoots got some swag.
Spike579 5 months ago
Yup, pretty close.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
Yes you do that next time, all right.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
There's no changed story, retroll. Most reports say there's no attack, well pretty much all of them I guess, the fear thing is on the part of the witness as the encounter happens.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
Wow....Actually, you can see her look back at BOTH MEN. First she looks at the person to the side and rear of her back, AND , the she looks 30-40degrees TO HER FORWARD as you might do yourself. You would want to "look' at your persuers....SHE SPOTS 2 DIFFERENT 'TARGETS'. RIGHT???
onceANexile 5 months ago
Wow....ty
onceANexile 5 months ago
Who ever said they'd run up to you and attack. They don't. If they did we'd never hear about it, the witness would be dead and gone.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
Reptiles, so. You really prefer to refuse logic, don'tcha. lol BF's a primate, but if you want to run up to one if you're ever that lucky, be my guest. Patterson did yes, simply because of the old belief it's just an ape of sorts, plus fewer reports in those days. You're simply not considering the situation, deliberately of course, your mental block won't let you coming from your cultural upbringing so you can't help it. I won't go into stupid discussions with you retroll, why this and why that.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
@reclaimerReclaimer That mental block is made of cement
rockstarzep 5 months ago
Not so fast, retroll... You can't follow tracks...when they aren't there all of them... Besides, who's gonna do that anyway? Know of such a posse? Nobody's spent enough time out there to get really close, the weekend researcher won't walk up to a Sasquatch and ask for a photograph. Most people seeing one get spooked pretty bad, the Sasquatch retreats and so will the witness, so it's very easy to sit here and just say follow it. Even you wouldn't...especially not you, hahaha.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
No, retro. Not all tracks can be faked, and once again you overlook the explanations and only bake on your own, just told you an example below... -The reason you blindly assume they can, is because we haven't found the beings making them. You're quite the comedian, you know.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
But it's a good theory, isn't it? ;-p Tracks are some of the best proof, many showing signs of real foot movement and sinking too deep into the ground for a person to do it, or to have dragged some heavy machinery into the wilderness for it...with no guarantee they'll ever be found before wind and weather mess up everything. Skeptics don't like the idea one got caught on camera here, dreaming it's rather f/x and preferring to be fooled by Patty... Told you they were smart beings, these Bigfoots.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
I wouldn't be pushing the Bob Heironimus thing if I were a skeptic. The chatter doesn't add up, the enactment in a monkey suit doesn't add up, the claimed suit is totally a joke, and a really careful observation of this film shows that there's no way in hell its Bob with the muscle existence, muscle movement, subtle breast movement, facial movement 2:56 AND 2:57, nonlocking knees and other dynamics, proportions, etc. Seriously, pause the thin-face she makes at 2:57 and say "Bob????????"
rockstarzep 6 months ago
Fuck off, retroll... That's my theory.
reclaimerReclaimer 6 months ago
Like you say retro...you know nothing of these beings' build yet you crap about them daily... It's sad and dumb, now I don't know which mostly...
reclaimerReclaimer 6 months ago
Hunchback, retroll...? I have a hunch you don't know much about the reported anatomy of these beings...
reclaimerReclaimer 6 months ago
Tits,,, Asscrack,,.. backflab..lovehandles... bulging calves muscles.. .
a suit? LOL yea right....
Robomatic1000 6 months ago
Only important thing to consider, is the fact they didn't make Bigfoot suits that looked anything like this - ever. That means never.
reclaimerReclaimer 6 months ago
You need to look at all the circumstances leading up to them "catching" a Bigfoot on tape and then decide if you think it's real. There's a lot going on about this little piece of film that most people don't know. YT PGF the final word as an example
ffmcmav40 6 months ago
That was a big foot. No doubt about it. It is anatomically impossible for a human to walk that way. They have tried. No one can duplicate this gait.
Nickalispicalis 6 months ago
@Nickalispicalis also, check out the 2 apelike facial expressions at 2:56 and 2:57. That's a hell of a flexible "mask" or else the "person" in the suit isn't afraid to show the separate, mechanical device powering the face. And something else is powering the herniated muscle in the bigfoot evidentce analysis video....real.
rockstarzep 6 months ago
Joey, it's clear trolls never listen or even know anything about which they troll... It just becomes mindless spam...
komodoman 6 months ago
@retrobloke78 I am bored with owning you, you gargantuan slack jawed dullard....I will delete further posts without even reading them...you are a simpleton...
joeyvader 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Show me a gorilla with an abnormal hunchback" Jesus...could this guy BE any dumber...???..Gorillas have huge traps like the Patterson subject... it's not a 'hunchback' idiot...tell us all ONE more time how NO primate has a line up their back..ONE more time!!?? Please!!??
joeyvader 6 months ago
You have been like a retarded chatty Kathy repeating over and over that NO primtates have a line down their backs...So I PROVED to you that gorillas DO have a line down their backs...didn't I moron?? Keep spouting off on how they DON'T halfwit...and NO...gorillas and chimps DON'T have large buttocks because they aren't BIPEDS...like I said..it's nasty of me to KEEP making fun of someone who is mentally challenged....ever get tired of being WRONG??
joeyvader 6 months ago
Comment removed
joeyvader 6 months ago
I've had EVERY skeptic from Emintardo to retroidiot tell me that there is NO line up a primates back like the one seen in the Patterson footage...google "Gorillas back'...well...behold!! The first, FIRST, I say FIRST image is a gorilla with a line up his back...(it's where all of the back muscle adhere)..I guess Janos Prohaska made that lowlanfd gorilla too...
joeyvader 6 months ago
So you are, yes eminaz...
komodoman 6 months ago
he holds the camera study when it goes far...nice move....fakeee
kush997 6 months ago
No, I realize the big flaws in your fairytales, retroll...
komodoman 6 months ago
Another eminaz.... They're smart enough to hide their tracks perhaps, seeing how we seem to be interested in them... These obviously are hominid of some kind. The reason we have dino bones at all, is because the ground some of them were preserved in happened to be ideal for it. Otherwise they'd all been gone millions of years ago, like most other dino bones. The soil in the PNW for instance, is not very good for preserving bones and thus we hardly ever find any or many dead animals at all.
komodoman 6 months ago
Do native americans have stories/legends about these...that should be a clue to their possible existence...also, they would be the best to track them as they could track a heavy animal surely...why only limited footprints...they wouldn't be trying to hide them so where is evidence of continuous prints in mud for instance...I think these aren't real...if they ever were then there is so little to suggest...we have alot of hominid evidence and dinosaur bones but no yeti/bigfoot clues
yodasodaskoda 6 months ago
@retrobloke78 They are always one step ahead of a human- it is their survival instinct. There has been a pattern of sasquatches being spotted (or footprints/evidence) in clusters or regions. No use arguing if you don't believe. Upcoming DNA evidence and clear new video may not be sufficient.
rockstarzep 6 months ago
So right you are rockstar, and retroll78 here fits Bindernagel's words so well...no one's more fooled than guys like that...
komodoman 6 months ago
Yup, they all look real laughable those cheap costumes and actually prove it was not possible to fake BF realistically due to human anatomy, & the apparent ignorance/indifference on the part of f/x specialists. Tall lanky human shaped dudes in undefined longhaired suits, fine for monster flicks but fooling us they can not. That, coupled with modern HD technology, will put an end to all the fake ones and seal good PGF-like footage conclusively real. That's what we're all hoping to see eventually.
komodoman 6 months ago
Patterson did find other footprints (all similar) before the Bluff Creek filming. Footprints had been spotted in the area, so that was why he went there. He got lucky.
rockstarzep 6 months ago
"No it hasn't been proven a hoax, but that's the perception out there".- Dr. Bindernagel, PhD.
rockstarzep 6 months ago
This is not a fake. It is genuine footage of a man in a padded fur suit. That is an important distinction. Fake would imply that the images had been manipulated in some way. This is genuine unaltered film footage of a paid actor who Patterson had walk along the creek bed while he filmed it. The costume had been created for the film that Patterson planned to gain finance for and produce. Presenting it as documentary evidence of a "Bigfoot" makes it a hoax ...not a fake. :|
digglyda 6 months ago
@digglyda
You couldn't be more wrong. It's not a costume and doesn't look like any costume either from those days or today. If you think it does then please provide an example.
LaughingGravy31 6 months ago
@LaughingGravy31: The one in the PGF clip is my example right there in front of us. A problem with the believers ridiculing the quality of other costumes is that they are all shown with detail from close examination whereas the costume in PGF is on grainy blurred film from about 100 feet distance, yet the believers insist the detail is outstanding. PGF is a Morris suit and the Wah Chang mask in my opinion. Patterson himself is reason enough to be suspicious of the PGF clip.
digglyda 6 months ago
@digglyda
So you CAN'T provide another example then? I thought so.
PST) The film isn't very grain and nor is it blurred. It's actually reasonably close and reasonably clear.
Morris suit and a Wah Chang mask? Are you serious? That's the biggest laugh I've ever had. Do you even know what a Morris suit circa '67 is like?
LaughingGravy31 6 months ago
@LaughingGravy31: We know that many suits were made in the 50's & 60's for films and entertainers. It is not my fault that there isn't many photo's of them available. Padding under the outer costume with shoulder pads. This looks like it could be similar to the monkey suit from the lost in space episode. I'm puzzled why BF believers have such faith in PGF, 'cos even if PGF is proved fake that doesn't disprove the existence of BF. Nobody likes being lied to and I think RP was hoaxing us all.
digglyda 6 months ago
@digglyda
There are plenty of films from AFTER the PGF from the 1970s that tried to get people in bigfoot suits. Again, none of them look anywhere near as convincing as the PGF film.
Even Rick Baker's King Kong 1976 has baggy legs, massive head for the body and regular length arms etc.
If you accept that the PGF was a hoax then you have to accept that Roger Patterson was light years ahead of Hollywood when it comes to bipedal ape suits.
LaughingGravy31 6 months ago
@digglyda I`m definitely on the sceptical side of this argument,I think Patterson took his secrets to his grave.compared to other "BF" films it is a masterful fake,maybe he just got lucky it turned out so well.One thing intrigues me though,why go to the extra trouble,and expense,of making breasts for the "creature",it seems a strange extra complication to the hoax..Whatever the truth its either a great hoax or the most important wildlife film in history.
swfcocs1 6 months ago
@digglyda
Snowbeast, Creature From Black Lake, Legend of Boggy Creek, Six Million Dollar Man, The Mysterious Monsters, Man or Beast, Sasquatch The Legend of Bigfoot etc etc were all filmed in the 1970s and had men in bigfoot type costumes. Not one of them comes anywhere near to what we seen in the Patterson film. They all look hoakey, even when seen at a distance and obscured in trees etc.
There are PLENTY of examples of bigfoot suits.
The PGF is by some way UNIQUE.
LaughingGravy31 6 months ago
Most people are fat, slow, dimwitted, uninspired, nonbelieving, and unable to catch a bigfoot. The main problem has been the lack of people in the field trying to come in contact with limited numbers of sasquatch. The doubters are definately going down the wrong street and setting themselves up for humiliation. Not all the accounts are hoaxes and mistakes. Not all discoverers of footprints, etc are fraud.
rockstarzep 6 months ago
It's all excuses to you, retroll...that's your main problem...your fixed bad excuses.
komodoman 6 months ago
An intelligent species not wanting to be found, why is that pathetic... No, it's smart behavior. The dummy is the human race, scared and not well enough equipped mentally...technically we're just getting there. So hold on for the ride. Or not. Your choice.
komodoman 6 months ago
Should've found Osama a lot sooner, that search was pathetic...and the Bigfoot's not a fucking monkey, probably not even an ape... lol
komodoman 6 months ago
the turn of the head scares me :(
09Spence 7 months ago
well if you would go camping in the spot this was filmed it not only takes a while to get to but at night you will hear and just feel like someone is watching you try it for yourself before you say anything bad about this video
jaydeeplayer7 7 months ago
Good to see the gait simulation. This is quite educational.
brianpatrickpellerin 7 months ago
That's Smokey The Bear going to put out a forest fire.
exhibit500 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SeeYTvid:Thedocumentary "Sasquatch: the Quest" is part ofthe Erickson Project and will unveil, for the first time, a host of never before seen sasquatch footage and other evidence chronicling the journey of the Erickson Project.The release of thedocumentarywillcoincidewiththereleaseof theDNAfindingscollaboratively withDr.Melba KetchumThey are very close to completion,but there is no exact time on when it will be done.Author is confident it will be worth the wait as the data is very complete
rockstarzep 7 months ago
how many times do you pick up your camera to see a big ass rare ass creature on its way out in the open lol
jakethe9th 7 months ago
Doesn't the bottom of its foot at 2:29 seem a little too white.... almost like the sole of a shoe?
psycologicalicon 7 months ago
@psycologicalicon IF it was faked (and im not saying it was or wasnt) do you think they would have put boobs on it and muscle definition but left their shoes on? Come on now.
bballz05 7 months ago
I could've sworn Bigfoot smiled at 2:56. Creepy..
SolXSlayer 7 months ago
What IS going on with the face stretching at 2:56 and then at 2:57?Every hair must have been glued to her face as stated in the bigfoot sasquatch evidence video.You can see the facial muscles and the narrowness of the face at the second apelike behavioral gesture at 2:57.That was a heck of a risk to take if you want to pull off a hoax.And which one of the MANY "he said, she said" confusing, contradicting stories is correct about this incredibly deeply analyzed film?I'll go with the side of pHDs.
rockstarzep 8 months ago
They forgot one key component in the animation. The hips move up and down. They stay in the same location of the body which makes the walk look funny. When a person walks their hips rise and fall with the motion.
pickeybickey 8 months ago
The climate in Florida, most if not all primate experts agree, is just about ideal for apes. Now, whether or not any skunk apes live there is the question.
komodoman 8 months ago
I dont see why it's so hard to believe that there might be a form of advanced ape species that we haven't discovered yet... if you really think about it, it would be a North American ape or USA & Canada, instead of like a South American ape of the Amazons or African Ape of the Congo and such. It's not an impossibility. Stranger things exist in the universe my friends.
biggee316 8 months ago
@biggee316 I don't think its tough to believe a big ape exists in the north americas, I think it's more the ignorance of it and lack of DNA evidence, although there was once evidence found of an ape speices that differed from human DNA and was close to chimp DNA.
snipesnrifles 7 months ago
In this video, that would be a hell of a mask if she can move her face muscles like she did in 2:56 and 2:57!!!
rockstarzep 8 months ago
@1:33 on bigfoot sasquatch evidence video
rockstarzep 8 months ago
BF has learned to hide well as a SURVIVAL MECHANISM.We DO have some fossil teeth if he is related to Gigantapithecus.We DO have video-this video is real-you can see the mass @1:33 and the herniated muscle.A large animal will be designed to not lock the knees as seen in the walk.Scientific evidence of bigfoot includes flexible footprints with dermal ridges, footprint size natural distribution, hair, scat, vocalizations, behavior signatures(broken trees, etc)& video.They're living under our noses!
rockstarzep 8 months ago
0:10 how hard is it to hold a camera steady.... thats the only reason I think its fake. If someone can show me a good view of him im 100 percent willing to believe.
samny631 8 months ago
@samny631 I believe patterson was on horse back while filming then he dismounts and runs across the creek. indicated by all the movement of the camera
OU8121ST 8 months ago
@OU8121ST What was the horse doing?Did he buck,is there a whoa,whoa,since the horse would see the BF,too.I thought animals could sense danger,even if the horse thought BF,was a bear.
twain103 8 months ago
@samny631 He was jumping off his horse i believe and running over stuff in the woods,
tusagnamaster 8 months ago
@samny631 If you saw a big foot for the first time how would you react? I doubt you would be able to hold a camera steady.
PaintVidz 8 months ago
@samny631 well you have to consider this is the 60's cameras weren't the point and click wonders we all have these days. he would have been fumbling with this clunky peace of shit video camera. plus you also have to consider when you see something shocking its hard to keep your composure so you might shake or tremble in the arms and legs
MrForestWitch 8 months ago
@samny631 I can't say that I'd have a completely steady hand if I was filming a bigfoot. Might even have peed a little.
domneth 8 months ago
@samny631 keep in mind that the man taking the footage is on horseback.... I believe that the horse reacted BEFORE Patterson saw the creature - so initially he is filming the creature while mounted on a horse that has been spooked.....
wolfatnight 7 months ago
@wolfatnight Is that why Patterson dismounted? You can lead a horse to water,but not to Bigfoot?
twain103 7 months ago
@samny631 You gotta think, if you were to see a big ass hairy monster thing, you'd be nervous as hell
thejonsta1995 6 months ago
@samny631 in a book i read as they first saw Bigfoot the horses ran off so he had to grab the camera and run to get closer
backseatinmate525 5 months ago
@samny631 Its not a fake, If anything a steady camera would point more towards a fake. Listen, no human being can walk the way this thing did. They have tried repeatedly to duplicate it and failed miserably.
Nickalispicalis 5 months ago in playlist Nickalispicalis's Favorited Videos
Take it you're deliberately forgetful.
felinefanII 8 months ago
You're forgetful/
IHABC8 8 months ago
Nah, find the old posts...
komodoman 8 months ago
@retrobloke78 That's all been explained numerous times and you know it...
komodoman 8 months ago
yeah and you have fairies in your garden too ?
Mr75littlebay 8 months ago
Wrong emin, there's not a single thing on her body that points to it being fake, in fact it all points to it being real. You'd be thrown out of court so fast if you came in there saying it's a costume, primatilogists have shown it's likely real.
komodoman 8 months ago
the whole subject of this film has been done to death its the huge fake feet that makes the bent knee walk just like wearing skis or flippers the evidence for this film being fake is strong enough to hold up in court it was part of a documentary that has been kept hidden theres loads on here about it but bigfoot itself is unproven at best
Mr75littlebay 8 months ago
if she just shaved ,she would be hot ! unless of course you like hairy big girls.
bobbyfluffynoodle 9 months ago
We've thought about it for more than a minute, which is why anyone not smart enough to see it's no suit is in fact the delusional part. The world is still a young place or human history is anyway. And our technological advances are like yesterday only, which is another delusional part to think we'd cracked this yet. In fact it all speaks against us having done so yet; not enough severe searching for one thing and an intelligent scary species, you do the math. Seriously. Tide's about to change...
komodoman 9 months ago
Okay, I'll humor you for a second. Lets say that its real. Why has there been no bodies found, no scientifically accepted photographic (or other media) evidence , not a single bigfoot ever found. One of the men present even admitted it was him yet you STILL cant accept it.
Anyone who believes in this is delusional. Its human nature to want there to be MORE to life , sure - but think about it for one minute.
cullyvan 9 months ago
@cullyvan There has been scientifically accepted evidence. DNA analysis was performed on suspected Bigfoot fecal matter and hair. The results showed that the DNA was from a previously unidentified primordial species. Also fingerprint analysis has been performed from footprint castings, the data consistently shows that there does exist some kind of primate unique to any we have studied in the past. And to dispute your claims about finding animal remains, it is a natural instinct of all animal
michaeljcoles 9 months ago
st o go somewhere very isolated when they vulnerable or dying. Bodies usually decomposed in weeks and are absorbed back into the environment. Ask any wildlife worker or park ranger etc how often they discover remains of wildlife that have died naturally. Be logical for a second, do you really think there would be thousands of sightings and other forms of evidence if this was all some elaborate conspiracy. Sure there are the nefarious who undermine the integrity of this argument with lucrativ
michaeljcoles 9 months ago
@michaeljcoles lucrative agendas, but i think its ignorant to look at something this compelling and immediately disclaim "FAKE"! The world is a crazy place filled with sometimes inconceivable phenomenons but all you disbelievers with be faced with a big hairy surprise someday.
michaeljcoles 9 months ago
@michaeljcoles Michael , there HASN'T . I don't know where you are getting this information, probably from some cooky book but its certainly not accepted in the serious scientific community. I would love for Bigfoot to be real but you have to seperate the heart from the head. Its unlikely , lets face it. There are Blue Whales and Gorillas. Both magnificent creatures, go enjoy them,
cullyvan 9 months ago
@cullyvan go watch the latest discovery channel's documentary sasquatch legend meets science
michaeljcoles 8 months ago
@michaeljcoles I'm sorry Michael, I dont watch the History channel or discovery as - to be perfectly frank with you - they are complete shit. Good luck all the same.
cullyvan 8 months ago
@cullyvan
michaeljcoles 8 months ago
your entitled to your opinion which i respect but jeez you sound like a cynical, close minded assholio!
michaeljcoles 8 months ago
@michaeljcoles you're probably right, if you get grumpier as you get older god knows where I'll end up. If it's real i'll send you money for a beer.
cullyvan 8 months ago
@michaeljcoles could you give a reference. if there was indeed unequivocal DNA evidence the debate would be over. last i heard it was still on. i think there is sufficient evidence to warrant scientific investigation. i hate it when naysayers present untrue data. i equally hate it when believers distort the truth.
cunnidvd 9 months ago
@cullyvan "One of the men present even admitted it was him yet you STILL cant accept it." Err, when you're attempting to be as condescending as possible, it really helps not to completely lie. Otherwise you just end up making a moron out of yourself, oddly enough.
Videodrome24 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Videodrome24 I;m not the one who believes in creatures for which there is no evidence. He admitted it.
cullyvan 9 months ago
The question remains - if it was a guy in a suit (a guy that the horses already knew) then why did his horse rear up and throw him.
Why - b/c it was an animal that the horse feared.
- and for all those non-believers - explain the thousands of footprints all over the US. These creatures have evolve to be nocturnal, while man is primary diurnal.
33Ozweldian 9 months ago
Well, luckily it is real as the bodily evidence of Patty points to. Had it been a fake with some 6ft guy in a suit, it'd actually have to be even taller since her torso's longer than a human's. We see all of her legs and hip area, so nothing's covered up there, meaning her top's too tall to reach. Arms set so high, and wide swinging from the top of shoulders. It all fits if you know the physical history of these beings' ape anatomy, those not in the know are the ones still thinking it's a suit.
komodoman 9 months ago
Comment removed
Countermence 9 months ago
@Countermence Patterson and Gimlin are 2 different people, ouch.
mrjoeyjiffy86 9 months ago
retro sees what he wants obviously. Depending on print you'll see the 'flap'.
komodoman 9 months ago
whats that flap of some thing on its ankle
MrSavagehawkeye 9 months ago
@retrobloke78 What man do you know could fill a "suit" as seen in this video? You should check out the serious scientific analyses of this footage instead of paying attention to shoot-from-the-hip so-called debunkers who operate from the assumption that because they don't believe Bigfoot exists, therefore the film must be fake. A good place to start is the website of the BFRO.
grejambri 9 months ago
the only thing "fake" about this is the music.
jjvrs 10 months ago
what random music for this
oaknairb 10 months ago
I appreciate the video and information, but man this song sucks so bad. Sorry if this is the uploaders band or whatever. Oh, just saw it was Jethro Tull. There's a reason I didn't buy that album. Wow, what a shitty song by them. Great band, but that was a turd.
TheMcSomething 10 months ago
Honestly, if you really saw bigfoot, and had a camera with you, wouldn't you try to follow it at a safe distance? This film is just too suspicious. Looks too good to be true
2pacalypse9 10 months ago
@2pacalypse9 I wouldn't follw her into the woods...what if her hubby was there...protecting a young one..? Good way to be another missing camper...
joeyvader 10 months ago
@joeyvader Yea but in the heat of the moment, most Bigfoot enthusiasts wouldn't be thinking rationally, and would in fact follow it for a lot longer, which is why I highly doubt this video is authentic.
2pacalypse9 10 months ago
@2pacalypse9 But it IS true, so put aside your professional skepticism for a minute, and listen to what scientists, who have taken the time to view this footage with an open mind and scientific curiosity, say about it. Check out the website for the BFRO, for starters.
grejambri 9 months ago
its one gorilla camon
shiNNToma 10 months ago
NO offense to the animated regeneration......but to me its not even close to Patty!!!!
Patty is all by herself in a league of her own.
YOU can feel the authenticity.....its real....maybe one of the few.
The cp generation just did not do it for me ....sorry....
I believe....ive seen, who cares,
paddletothesea1 10 months ago