@vashonwashington Congratulations. Now most Americans are being represented by people who, any way you cut it, are in the elite of the financial elite. Congress, , is a club that consists of 245 millionaires.
God save HM King George! Emperor of Hawaii island!
On another note, his "madness" is one example reason why my country's constitution noted the following: No person shall ever sit upon the Throne, who has been convicted of any infamous crime, or who is insane, or an idiot.
@ludicrus32. Oh, him. That, I do not know. I was actually talking about Hawaii--the Kingdom of Hawaii. Under the 1st constitution and constitutions after in the Kingdom of Hawaii, it states that, No person shall ever sit upon the Throne, who has been convicted of any infamous crime, or who is insane, or an idiot.
apart from all the americans thinking this is a political film ffs its a play,and Im sorry not all americans are the same as not all english people are its a great comedy in my humble opinion
@acerb45666555 I agree.Just started watching and Mr.Pitt is portrayed as stuffy,arrogant,rude.However, he hated slavery and was part of an aggressive campaign to end it when it was unpopular to do so.He told his friend that he would do what he did best--politics--and would become prime minister but that his friend must continue the fight and when his friends come banging on the door, he will be on the inside to let them in.Couldn't be all that bad.See film "Amazing Grace"..wonderful.
@ImaginedWriter Excuse me your George beat Lord General Cornwallis not His Majesty the King, had his majesty actually commanded his armies in the American colonies you would be singing god save the queen right now! After all George Washington lost 90% of the battles he fought in and only won the war after he received support from the Spanish and french simply outnumbering our forces.
@mak34237 very true despite being an 'ABSOLUTE" monarch George III was unable to pursue the war to victory if it was up to him he would chase the rebels to the gates of hell and back to keep them under British rule. Unfortunately by this time parliament was able to oust his administration under lord north and voted an end to the war.
@mak34237 Im an American and Im very pleased with the way things turned out and find the story of the revolution almost like a story book in how events unfolded. But I often sympathize with the King and wish history would have been kinder to him he was a better man than what historians have portrayed him to be.
O.o the crown jewels arguabley the msot protected jewels in the world, touched by barely a sole... yet at the start of this some lower class fool gobs all over them and gives 'em a quick shine with his very rough and potentially damaging tunic! good god! good god! thankyou for uploading this however! :)
Hahaha! His Britanic Majesty is funny! Not to mention he was our king during when we were part of the British Empire! Although our country had its own king, our lord was still HBM King George III until our country was unionized.
@uwed100 I see what you are saying. I never thought it that way. He is saying he is "fatter" and "getting fat." I interpreted it as two overzealous meddling parents overreacting that their son is lazy and getting fatter. Even though we know he is trim, it emphasizes the slow decline of the King's mental capability, his wife's undying support, and to establish tension between father and son. All three provide the thrust to the story.
@uwed100 That is conundrum with art, and more so with movies. Artistic license is often taken which often leaves authenticity taking a back seat. I have no idea why they made such a choice other than to set up the three points I stated earlier.
@uwed100 I would not say that my interpretation is correct. It is my interpretation. If someone comes up with an opposite opinion that is okay too. That's art.
@uwed100 Saying he is fat makes it funny. Kind of like Meryl Streep in Devil Wears Prada: "Alright, I will hire the fat girl" when she is almost thin as a rail.
Damn right! Since then you've had such luminaries as Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George Bush Sr., George Bush Jr. Now there's Barack Obama.....
But at least they've been your own crazy bastards, which a comfort I suppose.
Hey! It's George Villiers from Charles II..nice :) I always find it interesting how there are some actors/actresses who often portray characters in films about monarchs or other historical dramas.
Is it my imagination, but is King George III played by the same actor who played Humphrey in the British comedy "Yes, Prime Minister", they sound and look very similar. I might be wrong, but they sound alike
Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (19 May 1744 – 17 November 1818) was the Queen consort of the United Kingdom as the wife of King George III. She was also the electress consort of Hanover in the Holy Roman Empire until the promotion of her husband to King of Hanover on 12 October 1814, which made her Queen consort of Hanover.
Queen Charlotte was a patroness of the arts, known to Johann Christian Bach and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, among others. She was also an amateur botanist who helped expand Kew Gardens. George III and Charlotte had 15 children, 13 of whom survived to adulthood.
@happymax1 This was filmed at Arundel which (although the rest of the castle was largely rebuilt in the 1890s and isn't right in its details) has a keep which is about the same height as the Round Tower at Windsor was during George IV's reign.
King George was the last king to try to restore some of that ancient and rightful power owed to the Monarch of Great Britain. It was pity that no other king or queen afterward has as much courage as he did, to try and stop the Cromwellian hoards from usurping the Monarchy's natural power and rightful place in the British Government. Now that the people have a full, unbridled democracy, what do they do but elect twats and cretins, and set up Fascist and racist parties like the BNP and UKIP.
GOD BLESS THE UK. Your great nation has given me a home, the happiest day of my life was when I gave up my American Citizenship and became a British Citizen. I pay my taxes, raise my kids british and love my country and Queen. GOD BLESS BRITANNIA!!
You're saying that George III was the last real King of britain because the rest were idiots? How ironic, considering he was mad. William IV was a very good King - he practically delayed his death so that Victoria could become Queen - not very idiotic is it?
@MajBlood not so much anti-monarhcy, as against the fact that the monarch had the power to veto any bills proposed by parliament, thus reducing their power, a power the monarch still holds in theory, but which is seldom used, for the most part, bills are rubber stamped as a matter of course.
George III was the last real king of Britain. George IV, William IV, and Edward VIII were idiots. And while George V and VI are pretty cool, they had practically been figureheads like the monarchy is now.
@disamjisa Totally agree.. he was the exception to the rule you posited; though he was probably also the first modern monarch, who understand the modern position of the monarchy in Britain, about public relations, and so on. In that sense, he did reign rather than rule like his predecessors.
@ToaJoe First of all jackass, I said nothing about me preferring a stronger king, I merely said that he was a king who was not just a figurehead. Second of all, I am not entirely against powers for the king. I think they should still have the power to withhold royal assent. Also note that in the days of King George III and before, parliament was not really representatives of the people. They were just the noble elitist scum who like 10% of the pop could vote for. They were corrupt.
@ToaJoe So obviously you didn't read any of my comment. The time of King George was a completely different era where the king did deserve to have some power. Also on inspecting your page, and seeing your video against the royal wedding I can see that you hate the monarchy and are thus a disgrace to Great Britain and the Empire. All the great heroes of history like Francis Drake, Marlborough, Wellington, and Churchill would spit in your face.
@MajBlood Nope, I'm not a Republican, although I do think Republican countries can be fantastic. I was merely objecting (in a jokey way) to the appauling amount of money spent on the royal wedding. And no, they do not raise more money than is spent on them. You are a fool, sir.
@ToaJoe So what if the amount is 'appaulling'- better a wedding than, say, increasing the salary of that ignoble collection of cretins we call the 'Parliament' and enabling them to further spout nonsense and petty insults without doing any of the things they were elected to do. The money spent stimulate our economy further than anything Parliament can propose- those hired for the purpose of this affair are enriched, greatly, they have more spending power, leading them to buy things which ...
@ToaJoe creates a demand for more the products, leading to more hiring to feed their wants, and, thus, Capitalism Prevails, the Glory of Britain is restored minutely, and it is much more effective than anything Parliament has ever proposed.
@ToaJoe ToeJoe- you would do well to read what I wrote- I am not saying they 'raise more money than they take' (if raising revenue was the primary function of government, we might as well have a Bankocracy), what I am saying it that their spending help stimulate the economy more than anything your beloved parliament proposed. But, two can play this game- no, regicide and republicanism won't make Britain a land of eternal rainbows and fairies. We've tried that, remember Cromwell?
@jiahua448 Yeah, blah fucking blah, all politicians are idiots, blah blah blah. It's all you ever hear. In actual fact, there are plenty of talented people who have run our country.
@ToaJoe Give me the name of that single talented individual, that one person who isn't a complete and utter cretin, that lone fellow among the race that the world rightly scorn? But, I admit, not all who rule us are knaves, only that those who are not knaves are thieves. Also, I have doubts as you what you consider 'quality', when even your ability to read is highly questionable. Did they not lead us to another war, where we have no business of being? How do you defend that bit of Tomfoolery?
@ToaJoe There were only 'excellent' because they were able to hide their corruption and/or knavery. Sir Robert Wapole, for example, was a politician Par excellence because he was able to hide his massive corruption from the eyes of the legislators and the courts, and, yea, even the historian, though it was obvious to those who lived with him. But, you are right, I do hate Democracy and Liberalism, because I hate all government and all politics- surprised that your low blow and ad hominem...
@ToaJoe There were only 'excellent' because they were able to hide their corruption and/or knavery. Sir Robert Wapole, for example, was a politician Par excellence because he was able to hide his massive corruption from the eyes of the legislators and the courts, and, yea, even the historian, though it was obvious to those who lived with him. But, you are right, I do hate Democracy and Liberalism, because I hate all government and all politics- surprised that your low blow and ad hominem...
@ToaJoe attack was able to touch anything? That, in your attempt at petty attacking and avoiding any serious points was able to strike at anything? I would rather that man rule over himself so long as he doesn't adversely affect another man then let all the inmates of Bedlam and Newgate rule over him...you, on the other hand, would have it that we should be ruled by the power that be simply because the majority choose them. But, alas, this political discussion isn't relevant to the fact that...
@MajBlood actually it is a response to the changing times. you want the Queen to be blamed for everything like king george? The balance of power has evolved through time. The monarchy is set to lose power as more people want their reps in the House of Commons to have more say. But the delicate balance of powers between the monarchy and Parliament prevented us from having dictators... most of all, the British monarchy is the only national institution that is defiantly and unashamedly British! :)
God save the King! lol
POTCMarc101 6 days ago
Comment removed
POTCMarc101 6 days ago
Comment removed
mak34237 1 week ago in playlist The Madness of King George
I felt such happiness when he said "our former colonies in America" score one for us XD
vashonwashington 1 week ago
@vashonwashington Congratulations. Now most Americans are being represented by people who, any way you cut it, are in the elite of the financial elite. Congress, , is a club that consists of 245 millionaires.
theTerranEmpire3 1 week ago 4
Sir Nigel at his best!
oliverarado 1 week ago 2
relocatable gay beetch sais royalty are usually in a land of Harry Potter in their heads
jerryellis123 2 weeks ago
Dose anyone know the music on 9:10
POTCMarc101 2 weeks ago
@POTCMarc101 It's an adaptation of Händel's water music, I believe.
Wilbtube 1 week ago
xD i like it how the queen says smile and wave to the King George IV
POTCMarc101 2 weeks ago
God save HM King George! Emperor of Hawaii island!
On another note, his "madness" is one example reason why my country's constitution noted the following: No person shall ever sit upon the Throne, who has been convicted of any infamous crime, or who is insane, or an idiot.
DeltaEagle7700 4 weeks ago
@DeltaEagle7700 Then why is Charles heir to the throne?
ludicrus32 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
DeltaEagle7700 2 weeks ago
@ludicrus32. Who is Charles?
DeltaEagle7700 2 weeks ago
@DeltaEagle7700 His Royal Highness, Prince of Wales? Charles?
ludicrus32 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ludicrus32. Oh, him. That, I do not know. I was actually talking about Hawaii--the Kingdom of Hawaii. Under the 1st constitution and constitutions after in the Kingdom of Hawaii, it states that, No person shall ever sit upon the Throne, who has been convicted of any infamous crime, or who is insane, or an idiot.
A lesson that was adopted.
DeltaEagle7700 2 weeks ago
God Save King George!!!!!
zyzor 1 month ago
i hate to see one of the king servants spat the crown... ewww
slaveandovercomer 1 month ago
George Washington
WUDJABEABLE 1 month ago
apart from all the americans thinking this is a political film ffs its a play,and Im sorry not all americans are the same as not all english people are its a great comedy in my humble opinion
j3parrots 1 month ago
that one Pitt, is the drollest bag of stuffiness ive ever seen! i wonder if he was really like that?
acerb45666555 1 month ago
@acerb45666555 I agree.Just started watching and Mr.Pitt is portrayed as stuffy,arrogant,rude.However, he hated slavery and was part of an aggressive campaign to end it when it was unpopular to do so.He told his friend that he would do what he did best--politics--and would become prime minister but that his friend must continue the fight and when his friends come banging on the door, he will be on the inside to let them in.Couldn't be all that bad.See film "Amazing Grace"..wonderful.
GINA7582 1 month ago
@GINA7582 Mr Wilberforce I presume you mean sir
j3parrots 1 month ago
im from canada i even live there but i speak french and english
aaronrockin24 1 month ago
What what!
juultjuh99 1 month ago
Our George kicked this ass holes butt so bad he went mad.
lol god bless America.
ImaginedWriter 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@ImaginedWriter Excuse me your George beat Lord General Cornwallis not His Majesty the King, had his majesty actually commanded his armies in the American colonies you would be singing god save the queen right now! After all George Washington lost 90% of the battles he fought in and only won the war after he received support from the Spanish and french simply outnumbering our forces.
mak34237 1 month ago in playlist 18th Century Films
@mak34237 very true despite being an 'ABSOLUTE" monarch George III was unable to pursue the war to victory if it was up to him he would chase the rebels to the gates of hell and back to keep them under British rule. Unfortunately by this time parliament was able to oust his administration under lord north and voted an end to the war.
zyzor 1 month ago
@zyzor I know to think how different the world would have been if HM was able to continue fighting the rebels in the colonies.
mak34237 1 month ago
@mak34237 Im an American and Im very pleased with the way things turned out and find the story of the revolution almost like a story book in how events unfolded. But I often sympathize with the King and wish history would have been kinder to him he was a better man than what historians have portrayed him to be.
zyzor 1 month ago
@zyzor I agree, alot of people don't stop and think about enough of it I guess.
mak34237 1 month ago
@ImaginedWriter yay vote Palin you twat
j3parrots 1 month ago
DO YOU KNOW ENGLAND SIR, great film
j3parrots 1 month ago
I love the little look from Pitt when he manages to get in a sly dig 12.38, the happiest hes ever been
j3parrots 2 months ago
History is wonderful! I like the late 1790s-early 1800s a lot! thanks for uploading.
cmsahe 2 months ago
O.o the crown jewels arguabley the msot protected jewels in the world, touched by barely a sole... yet at the start of this some lower class fool gobs all over them and gives 'em a quick shine with his very rough and potentially damaging tunic! good god! good god! thankyou for uploading this however! :)
XxGREATxBRITAINxX 2 months ago
thanks! this is absolutely wonderful movie <3
ROZENGIL 2 months ago
ahhhhhh MR Fox is Carson from Downton Abbey
OHCLOUDSUNFOLD 2 months ago
Whats the name of the song that's played by the bells, beginning at 14:16 ?
hattersuffa 2 months ago
@hattersuffa Greensleeves by Henry the VIII
OHCLOUDSUNFOLD 2 months ago
at 6:23 you will see the ladie puting a prune knife inside the paper
POTCMarc101 3 months ago
One of the few movies really worth seeing in the last 20 years.
wildh0rse 3 months ago
"Give me my property, or the country will be drenched in blood!"
"Will it indeed, madam? Well..." *Holds up knife*
"...Not with this. It's a fruit-knife! Wouldn't cut a cabbage!"
That's my favourite scene in the entire movie. I dunno why. I just find it funny.
Shangas 3 months ago
Hahaha! His Britanic Majesty is funny! Not to mention he was our king during when we were part of the British Empire! Although our country had its own king, our lord was still HBM King George III until our country was unionized.
DeltaEagle7700 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes you are
SymphonyDogs 3 months ago
que canción es la que empieza a partir del minuto 14:16 ?
88hittler 3 months ago
Comment removed
88hittler 3 months ago
unlike you mr. pitt you don't have any ideas.... lmao what a bastard!
NemesisMLT89 3 months ago
Wow, Rupert Graves is so cute in this! He looks good in pretty much anything, but I seem to have caught him in a lot of period pieces lately.
Katrinawitch 3 months ago
look at 14.59 best part
123georgeytube 3 months ago
The Prince of Wales was quite a corpulent man (around 150 kg or
330 pounds) - and they are refering to it in this movie.
I ask myself why they have chosen such a slim actor then for his role.
I have noticed this more often recently: In German tv I saw a very slim
actor as Martin Luther recently,who was quite a big man too ,at least
after marriage....
They will present us a slim,young and athletic Winston Churchill next ?
uwed100 4 months ago
@uwed100 I see what you are saying. I never thought it that way. He is saying he is "fatter" and "getting fat." I interpreted it as two overzealous meddling parents overreacting that their son is lazy and getting fatter. Even though we know he is trim, it emphasizes the slow decline of the King's mental capability, his wife's undying support, and to establish tension between father and son. All three provide the thrust to the story.
nujac321 4 months ago in playlist Madness of King George
@nujac321 Your interpretation is certainly right.
I have my information about the corpulence of the prince from a visit to the
Royal Pavillion in Brighton and as they said there he was already quite big
as a young man.When being King George IV. he even avoided to be seen in
public after 1823 because of his massive overweight,he was afraid of being laughed at.
So.... I really do not know why Prince George wasn´t played by a big young man,
it would have been more authentic.
uwed100 4 months ago
@uwed100 That is conundrum with art, and more so with movies. Artistic license is often taken which often leaves authenticity taking a back seat. I have no idea why they made such a choice other than to set up the three points I stated earlier.
nujac321 4 months ago
@uwed100 I would not say that my interpretation is correct. It is my interpretation. If someone comes up with an opposite opinion that is okay too. That's art.
nujac321 4 months ago
@nujac321 It is a movie,not a documentary,let´s put it this way.
When I said your interpretation is "correct" I wanted to express that I found
it reasonable (You have somehow opened my eyes to something I did not
see,although I had seen Blackadder before,where it was obviously done for fun-
having the slim Hugh Laurie as fat Prince Regent).
I probably wouldn´t have used the word "correct" in German,but it was the first
English word that occured to me.
uwed100 4 months ago
@uwed100 You are German? Cool! Yea, that is the great thing about art. You can find value in other people's interpretation. That's what makes it fun.
nujac321 4 months ago
@uwed100 Saying he is fat makes it funny. Kind of like Meryl Streep in Devil Wears Prada: "Alright, I will hire the fat girl" when she is almost thin as a rail.
nujac321 4 months ago
Thank god we got away from this crazy bastard.
TheImperialistStates 4 months ago
@TheImperialistStates
Damn right! Since then you've had such luminaries as Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George Bush Sr., George Bush Jr. Now there's Barack Obama.....
But at least they've been your own crazy bastards, which a comfort I suppose.
:))
SunnyJim33 4 months ago
@SunnyJim33 Damn Strait! I'm glad you can see the Light :)!
TheImperialistStates 4 months ago
Hey! It's George Villiers from Charles II..nice :) I always find it interesting how there are some actors/actresses who often portray characters in films about monarchs or other historical dramas.
Nicollie1062 4 months ago
George III is remembered much more favourably in Britain than in America.
histrav 4 months ago
I'm just guessing here that the person who uploaded this is British....
heykewlaid 4 months ago
Is it my imagination, but is King George III played by the same actor who played Humphrey in the British comedy "Yes, Prime Minister", they sound and look very similar. I might be wrong, but they sound alike
alternatehistorian 5 months ago in playlist The Madness of King George III
@alternatehistorian
Yes you are absolutely right.One and the same.Sir Nigel Barnard Hawthorne (1929 – 2001).A great actor.May God bless his soul!
fabvier 4 months ago
Helen Mirren sure loves to play roles of/or relating to Monarchy !
Iusedtobeacat93 5 months ago
Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (19 May 1744 – 17 November 1818) was the Queen consort of the United Kingdom as the wife of King George III. She was also the electress consort of Hanover in the Holy Roman Empire until the promotion of her husband to King of Hanover on 12 October 1814, which made her Queen consort of Hanover.
SuperGreatSphinx 5 months ago
Queen Charlotte was a patroness of the arts, known to Johann Christian Bach and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, among others. She was also an amateur botanist who helped expand Kew Gardens. George III and Charlotte had 15 children, 13 of whom survived to adulthood.
SuperGreatSphinx 5 months ago
Can someone name the piece of music at 05:01?
stevenross100 5 months ago
"The Colonies!. LOL God Save the King!!!
mak34237 5 months ago
Houaaarrr, she's a catholic!
Jemmer1000 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I haven't seen the movie for years.
Alphahumphrey2011 6 months ago
haha i love how he keeps saying what what and then hey hey, i was almost waiting for him to say now put your hands up in the air
soccergirl97979 6 months ago
As cold as a Greyhound's nostrils? Just how do you know how cold it is up the nostrils of a greyhound?
Jamestopboy 6 months ago
The Round Tower at Windsor castle was only half the height it is now during George the III's reign....
happymax1 7 months ago
@happymax1 This was filmed at Arundel which (although the rest of the castle was largely rebuilt in the 1890s and isn't right in its details) has a keep which is about the same height as the Round Tower at Windsor was during George IV's reign.
ghughesarch 6 months ago
@ghughesarch Oops - sorry - the matte painting in the distant view is wrong, as it shows Windsor much as it is since George IV's rebuilding.
ghughesarch 6 months ago
Smile and wave, c'mon everybody smile and wave.... It's what you're paid for....
Jemmer1000 7 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
its good to be the king
ozrantrel5959 7 months ago
awesome movie
haven't seen it in ages
aldernagon3 7 months ago
@Rocketpeace1 Ahhhhh Blackadder! Bravo, good sir.
MajBlood 7 months ago
Comment removed
Jemmer1000 8 months ago
Not iike you, Mister Pitt, you don't have ideas....
Jemmer1000 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
and you are a bitchy little girl...lol!
suryavajra 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
Well you'd be having the ones with the trans-fat all over 'em...lol!
suryavajra 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
Now you're just seething and throwing a hissy fit...lol!
suryavajra 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
you have a whole bunch of crisps...dude...
suryavajra 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
Maybe you ought to just calm down, have a cookie and realize your tyrant bff was actually lost his marbles...lol!
suryavajra 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
Have fun on your trip over there..lol!
suryavajra 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
it's called slang...
suryavajra 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
Your boy ain't all that. What up now?
suryavajra 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
Are you chokin' on it??
suryavajra 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
Well at least us Americans understand the difference between "a" and "an." Learn how to use your language properly you English fuck.
devoncitadel 8 months ago
What did that old man mean by "it's as cold as a greyhound's nostril"? Why would a greyhound's be colder than any other dog's?
doobiesmoke15 8 months ago
King George was the last king to try to restore some of that ancient and rightful power owed to the Monarch of Great Britain. It was pity that no other king or queen afterward has as much courage as he did, to try and stop the Cromwellian hoards from usurping the Monarchy's natural power and rightful place in the British Government. Now that the people have a full, unbridled democracy, what do they do but elect twats and cretins, and set up Fascist and racist parties like the BNP and UKIP.
jiahua448 8 months ago
one day i shall visit UK and by possibility may live rest of my life there
Bigstarrocker9 8 months ago
does anyone know the name of the music played at the start of this film??
aisokulaguy 9 months ago
@aisokulaguy The first piece played right after the opening credits is the Overture from Saul (HWV 53) by George Frideric Handel.
BritainShallPrevail 9 months ago 2
@BritainShallPrevail .... Well done!
TheSchizopodcaster 6 months ago
@BritainShallPrevail What about when they are riding in the carriages? That's probably another Handel piece
Labryschick 6 months ago
@Labryschick You are correct, that is also from Handel's "Saul."
BritainShallPrevail 6 months ago
GOD BLESS THE UK. Your great nation has given me a home, the happiest day of my life was when I gave up my American Citizenship and became a British Citizen. I pay my taxes, raise my kids british and love my country and Queen. GOD BLESS BRITANNIA!!
MonMonsieurBleu 9 months ago
Kinda ironic how he recognized the would be assassin was mad and that he himself would soon be mad as well.
ProtestantIRA 10 months ago
Gotta love George and Fred, sharing that flask of booze before the King's speech. Rupert Everett, and Julian Rind-Tutt are awesome actors!
elrond70 10 months ago
As a American, I obivously favor seperation. But I wish Americans would realize how enlightened, how smart, and how good of a King he was.
HalfBornUnicornFetus 10 months ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
finally, a whole movie that you can see on Youtube!!!
Marmalade000000 10 months ago
Notice on the old door at the start....near ST its say 1862
CanadaCob 10 months ago
Comment removed
mccrie407 10 months ago
Do not be fat sir! Fight it! Fight it!
Xbizkitl 11 months ago 2
The Prince of Wales has such a good sarcastic manner, it's all his eyes and mouth.
Xbizkitl 11 months ago
Comment removed
Bigstarrocker9 11 months ago
Comment removed
MissCazzyBub 1 year ago
You're saying that George III was the last real King of britain because the rest were idiots? How ironic, considering he was mad. William IV was a very good King - he practically delayed his death so that Victoria could become Queen - not very idiotic is it?
MissCazzyBub 1 year ago
hallalujah to that MajBlood
The7ElevenShow 1 year ago
Many thanks for uploading this most excellent film!!!
rokedetbamidbar 1 year ago
Wow were William Pitt and Mr. Fox really so anti-monarchy?
MajBlood 1 year ago
@MajBlood not so much anti-monarhcy, as against the fact that the monarch had the power to veto any bills proposed by parliament, thus reducing their power, a power the monarch still holds in theory, but which is seldom used, for the most part, bills are rubber stamped as a matter of course.
fauxsham 1 year ago
@fauxsham So while George III was the beginning of the monarchy losing power, royal assent still meant something right?
MajBlood 1 year ago
George III was the last real king of Britain. George IV, William IV, and Edward VIII were idiots. And while George V and VI are pretty cool, they had practically been figureheads like the monarchy is now.
MajBlood 1 year ago 16
@MajBlood I disagree. William IV, the last two George's and Eddie VII did a rather good job.
jgrisso07 11 months ago
@MajBlood I think you forgot about Queen Victoria and Edward VII
324wilson 11 months ago
@MajBlood Edward VII was ok?
disamjisa 11 months ago
@disamjisa He wasn't that bad, relatively speaking.
MajBlood 10 months ago
@disamjisa Totally agree.. he was the exception to the rule you posited; though he was probably also the first modern monarch, who understand the modern position of the monarchy in Britain, about public relations, and so on. In that sense, he did reign rather than rule like his predecessors.
disamjisa 10 months ago
@MajBlood Real king? So you're one of these twats who supports a King's power over parliament?
ToaJoe 9 months ago
@ToaJoe First of all jackass, I said nothing about me preferring a stronger king, I merely said that he was a king who was not just a figurehead. Second of all, I am not entirely against powers for the king. I think they should still have the power to withhold royal assent. Also note that in the days of King George III and before, parliament was not really representatives of the people. They were just the noble elitist scum who like 10% of the pop could vote for. They were corrupt.
MajBlood 9 months ago
@MajBlood It doesn't matter, the power should be in the hands of the PM, not the monarch.
ToaJoe 9 months ago
@ToaJoe So obviously you didn't read any of my comment. The time of King George was a completely different era where the king did deserve to have some power. Also on inspecting your page, and seeing your video against the royal wedding I can see that you hate the monarchy and are thus a disgrace to Great Britain and the Empire. All the great heroes of history like Francis Drake, Marlborough, Wellington, and Churchill would spit in your face.
MajBlood 9 months ago
@MajBlood Nope, I'm not a Republican, although I do think Republican countries can be fantastic. I was merely objecting (in a jokey way) to the appauling amount of money spent on the royal wedding. And no, they do not raise more money than is spent on them. You are a fool, sir.
ToaJoe 9 months ago
@ToaJoe So what if the amount is 'appaulling'- better a wedding than, say, increasing the salary of that ignoble collection of cretins we call the 'Parliament' and enabling them to further spout nonsense and petty insults without doing any of the things they were elected to do. The money spent stimulate our economy further than anything Parliament can propose- those hired for the purpose of this affair are enriched, greatly, they have more spending power, leading them to buy things which ...
jiahua448 8 months ago
@ToaJoe creates a demand for more the products, leading to more hiring to feed their wants, and, thus, Capitalism Prevails, the Glory of Britain is restored minutely, and it is much more effective than anything Parliament has ever proposed.
jiahua448 8 months ago
@jiahua448 The monarchy does not raise more money than it takes.
ToaJoe 8 months ago
@ToaJoe ToeJoe- you would do well to read what I wrote- I am not saying they 'raise more money than they take' (if raising revenue was the primary function of government, we might as well have a Bankocracy), what I am saying it that their spending help stimulate the economy more than anything your beloved parliament proposed. But, two can play this game- no, regicide and republicanism won't make Britain a land of eternal rainbows and fairies. We've tried that, remember Cromwell?
jiahua448 8 months ago
@ToaJoe Better to be ruled by a single idiot than an army of them.
jiahua448 8 months ago
@jiahua448 Yeah, blah fucking blah, all politicians are idiots, blah blah blah. It's all you ever hear. In actual fact, there are plenty of talented people who have run our country.
ToaJoe 8 months ago
@ToaJoe Give me the name of that single talented individual, that one person who isn't a complete and utter cretin, that lone fellow among the race that the world rightly scorn? But, I admit, not all who rule us are knaves, only that those who are not knaves are thieves. Also, I have doubts as you what you consider 'quality', when even your ability to read is highly questionable. Did they not lead us to another war, where we have no business of being? How do you defend that bit of Tomfoolery?
jiahua448 8 months ago
@jiahua448 In the last 300 years, we've had excellent politicans. Lloyd George, Henry Asquith, Disraeli, Gladstone, Edward Grey, Pitt.
You, of course, will dispute this, because you quite clearly hate democracy and hate Liberalism.
ToaJoe 8 months ago
@ToaJoe There were only 'excellent' because they were able to hide their corruption and/or knavery. Sir Robert Wapole, for example, was a politician Par excellence because he was able to hide his massive corruption from the eyes of the legislators and the courts, and, yea, even the historian, though it was obvious to those who lived with him. But, you are right, I do hate Democracy and Liberalism, because I hate all government and all politics- surprised that your low blow and ad hominem...
jiahua448 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ToaJoe There were only 'excellent' because they were able to hide their corruption and/or knavery. Sir Robert Wapole, for example, was a politician Par excellence because he was able to hide his massive corruption from the eyes of the legislators and the courts, and, yea, even the historian, though it was obvious to those who lived with him. But, you are right, I do hate Democracy and Liberalism, because I hate all government and all politics- surprised that your low blow and ad hominem...
jiahua448 8 months ago
@ToaJoe attack was able to touch anything? That, in your attempt at petty attacking and avoiding any serious points was able to strike at anything? I would rather that man rule over himself so long as he doesn't adversely affect another man then let all the inmates of Bedlam and Newgate rule over him...you, on the other hand, would have it that we should be ruled by the power that be simply because the majority choose them. But, alas, this political discussion isn't relevant to the fact that...
jiahua448 8 months ago
@ToaJoe you willfully misinterpret what I have said and ignored all attempt at correcting your ignorance.
To end this, I would say that you would ignore everything I just said because you quite clearly hate any form of sense or wisdom.
jiahua448 8 months ago
@MajBlood Waabout Vicky?
Jemmer1000 7 months ago
@Jemmer1000 Believe it or not, but she was indeed a woman.
MajBlood 7 months ago
@MajBlood Oh, king, eh?, very nice.
Jemmer1000 7 months ago
Comment removed
Jemmer1000 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MajBlood actually it is a response to the changing times. you want the Queen to be blamed for everything like king george? The balance of power has evolved through time. The monarchy is set to lose power as more people want their reps in the House of Commons to have more say. But the delicate balance of powers between the monarchy and Parliament prevented us from having dictators... most of all, the British monarchy is the only national institution that is defiantly and unashamedly British! :)
flowerpuff2001 6 months ago
this was the first thing i saw Rupert Graves in. and Julian Rhind-Tutt. great actors.
...actually, you can't fault anyone in this film. brilliance and perfection.
bastianskaye 1 year ago
Great movie. what what.
trev79 1 year ago
I have been wanting to see this movie for over a year but can't find it anywhere, thank you thank you thank you!!
MightyPopzilla 1 year ago 2
Thanks for uploading this!
markab26 1 year ago
hawthorne was robbed of the oscar
jferkfjkj 1 year ago 17
Thank you! I remember it being up on youtube not to long ago but it was taken down.
JoeMomma2002 1 year ago
Thanks for posting this wonderful movie!
324wilson 1 year ago
@13:20...globe shows US after Louisiana purchase ;-)
Thank you for posting this magnificent film!
JohnnyNW 1 year ago
@JohnnyNW I saw that too! :D I giggled.
ClarinetMadeofSteele 1 year ago
@ClarinetMadeofSteele also: at end, HM George III arrives at Saint Paul's already with the statue of his granddaughter Queen Victoria in front!
JohnnyNW 1 year ago
@JohnnyNW im quite sure the statue is of queen anne and not victoria.
rulebritannia1 1 year ago
@rulebritannia1 One would certainly hope so.
ludicrus32 1 year ago
thank you!
starrynightz 1 year ago
Brillant mate !
jim11091995 1 year ago