Added: 11 months ago
From: G20Detainee
Views: 19,869
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (119)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Is that homeland security again? They are everywhere

  • Nice....stick it to them!!!!

  • I like how you post the recent court ruling saying you can videotape in a PUBLIC AREA. It just proves you are wrong. A FEDERAL BUILDING is not PUBLIC AREA. Under US law, any building and land that that building is on is property of the US GOV while it is under contract or OWNed by the GOV. PUBLIC LAND is any land used for public use that is NOT STATE or GOV owned. Mean if you go to Disney world you can take a video of you and your family on rides OWEND by a private company for your USEs.

  • tyou used a flip cam and editied with flip edit

  • U cant photograph federal biilding if u want pics pf a feferal buolding go to google streetview

  • Awsum Job ,,, Keep it up ! ( datona beach )

  • Relationship to 9/11?

    The only continuous TWO HOUR VIDEO of the 9/11 wtc attacks that is known to exist: 'Tuesday Morning in September'. It is something from that day you have NOT seen. You may have seen other posts about it on Youtube. It is not like so much other crap that has been put out since 9/11; it is not a propaganda, and or opinion piece. It has no fair comparison with anything. It is 9/11 like you have never seen. Please preview the 130 min chronicle. There is an upload on my channel

  • @thefiveeagles ye but if they say you look like a terrorist then they'll pull their NDAA horseshit

  • All i ask is WHY?!?

  • The Gs~ whatever rules are ILLEGAL.!

    One of OUR few PRIME rules says there shall be no laws against this freedom.

    Then they come up with what you call rules, that apparently contradict an older and greater Primary rule? the new 1 is null and void, In fact whoever made the law/rule, or voted on it, or tries to enforce it IS A CRIMINAL!. - e.g. The 'Patriot Act' - is a Crime! those who voted for it or got others to vote for it, and those who attempt to Enforce it ARE CRIMINALS, just like a thief!

  • I live on a border town. Some people I know on the US side told me a story of this one young lad that was in a hurry to get home because of parental curfew. He knew he was a bit late so he started jogging it home. The cops detained him and brought him to the station because he was running past a federal building. How true the story is, I don't know. But it wouldn't surprise me.

  • GOOGLED IT!!

    techdirt.com/articles/20110127­/18071812866/federal-officials­-finally-admit-that-photograph­ing-federal-buildings-is-not-c­rime

    .shtml

  • No person, place or thing should expect privacy in a public place. You can get more information about a Federal Building on Google Earth than you can from going there and taking a picture. On Google Earth I can see some building at street level or at a birds eye view. Being told that you can not take a picture is stupid when I can see more of the building at home on the computer.

  • I see this all over the internet where people constantly want to practice their rights by testing the system. Of all the photos or video one can take, why push the envelope by shooting a Fed. bildg. It's immature, show lack of reason and on a deeper level simply shows that you're an angry person who may or may not have intent.

  • @washme1ful because it's their right. it's that simple.

  • These poeple have a very tough job and your photographing dosen't help or give them a feeling of ease or security at work. Where have you been the last ten years? The moon? Your just a tool! God what has happened to people today!!!!

  • No primate, I'm only responding to the idiot manner in which you tried to draw a parallel between taking a photograph of a building, and vandalizing a building.

  • @simlaurel still you haven't watched her other videos..... your argument is still invalid sir/ mam, i didnt draw any parallels between vandalism and illegal photography. if you would have watched her other videos shit for brains you would've understood my comment. SHE IS A VANDAL, she draws on public structures and walls and in defense of the people in her community i would be rather p-o'ed if some dike was rubbing chalk and political messages and shit i look at everyday

  • its scum like you and you're little knitting circle that go around doing illegal things (like video taping a federal building's entrance, vandalism, etc.) not even contributing to better American society because you're so focused on some lad trying to do his job. there's a reason why people just cant go writing on property... what if someone drew a giant penis on your front door? who are you going to complain to? the police... see what i mean

  • @SAOAFR...Not sure how you construe taking a photo in front of a building the same way as vandalism.

  • @simlaurel obviously you have the situation awareness of a fucking rock (SAOAFR)... go watch her other videos. then try to make an intelligent comment to construe my point.

  • @SAOAFR it's obvious you're an idiot you cannot compare filming to vandalism even though you did thus proving you'd never get accepted into any federal agency as you lack basic knowledge.How you defended yourself again making you the idiot because once again a camera cannot damage a fucking thing known fact don't even try to bullshit me.It's also another interesting fact most law enforcement & actual federal agencies with the exception of afew fear camera's...To be contined.

  • @SAOAFR because camera's cannot lie thus making them accountable for any illegal action's commited by law enforcement or government agencies.My father was a officer but when most law enforcement wasn't nothing more then hired goon's working for corporations & elitist because they've got no pride or courage anymore.Only coward's serve people that ultimately want us all dead as they are sociopaths.Do the research on the bilderbergers as well as people claiming to be the llluminati.

  • Also in most protest in recent year's every disturbance was caused by undercover officer's dressing up like anarchist.My respect for most law enforcement & federal agencies is almost gone when you betray not only your country but the people as well including their own families i can't really respect people like them they are nothing but simpleminded slave's of elite billionaires bent on control of the entire world.For instance the war's are for the central banks.a few country's left Iran,etc.

  • @bkeener86 if you don't have any proof or resources to prove your point then of course im going to think your statement is completely false (which it is)

  • @SAOAFR yeah video evidence isn't evidence just stop you've clearly lose already which is sad i've argued with more intelligent officer's and even they were smart enough to not keep up the defend lies.Bilderberg group is well known for controling most of what happens around the world they own the media,music industry just name they control just about everything.Though you know all that you're just making a sad attempt at keeping me & other's in the dark.Help's if you're smart & you're not.

  • @bkeener86

    Mr. Brian L. Keener- 26 M, lives in Bartow, Florida, Graduated from Bartow Senior Highschool in 2005.

    if you would just read my comments you would have read "SHE IS A VANDAL, she draws on public structures and walls and in defense of the people in her community i would be rather p-o'ed if some dike was rubbing chalk and political messages and shit i look at everyday".

    and you call me stupid? i know who you are so think twice before arguing with someone over youtube

  • @SAOAFR kid reading my profile doesn't make you smart infact anyone can read my profile lucky for you i made it public.If my profile had been say friend's only what would say then smart ass exactly nothing or you'd think of a reply for sometime.I don't go around investigating everyone i only base my opinion on the fact's i have before me.Thus if your claim's are infact the truth then yes my opinion will change to she's a bitch who should be locked up.But never compare vandalism to filming.

  • @SAOAFR It present's you as an idiot that's not a insult i'm just telling you the cold hard truth i mean think of it this way if i was trying to compare murder to theft how intelligent would i appear to you...exactly i'd look like a freaking dumb shithead.It's all in the wording of your comments or messages remember that as the wording will either get you reply's such as the idiot down below or people who understand i do understand i'm just telling you that your comparison wasn't well thoughtout

  • @SAOAFR Also don't try to pass yourself off as a government agent by posting my public profile information which again i made public.Next comment impress i want my address,social security number,etc everything not on my profile then i'll believe your a intellience agent brother.If you're not part of a agency that's ok but you sure are acting the part fill out a application at whichever agency interest you.It won't be easy even the test to be a federal security guard are a bitch i know some :D.

  • If nutcases harassed me like this, I would turn into a complete dick too.

  • cops shouldnt be allowed to lie. thats bullshit.

  • @24EN

    There is no federal statute that coneys that power. So the extent of the powers of detention or arrest would be those conveyed by the state, county, or local jurisdiction. In a sense I did make a blanket assertion. Apologies.

  • @TheMacducky Actually security has the power of arrest.....on the property. Just not sure if what the person was doing was illegal.

  • Abuse of authority is rampant. The only way to curbe that is to enforce your RIGHTS. Agency rules do not trump law.

  • Go to the department of labor site. With health and welfare those low paid security geeks make well over $20.00 an hour. However, they are just contract security with no arrest authority.

  • This isnt even a cop or even a govt employee. These are low paid private rental guards. They make like 11 bucks an hour and have to arrest powers.

    The fed govt just pays some local security company to have these people stand around.

    They arent cops.

  • this bitch is just retarded.

  • @ZzRvXzZ They were both kinda retarded. She could of had a better approach and he should of tazed her.

  • yea listen to him he told the truth GSA rules, are you a GSA employee? then they don't apply to you.

    Rules, codes, statutes, regulations and acts are for corporate employees or corporations. Unless you work for them you are neither one

    Law enforcement are not enforcing private law, they are enforcing a "contract" if they can get you to "understand" their law. (I mean contract)

    Maxims of law says: Law is contract, contract makes the law, and consent makes the contract. Legality is not reality.

  • You're so stupid... GO Find something to do...

    i think that you need a MAN to put a penis in your vagina... maybe that's your problem...

    you fucking disgusting bitch, leave the godamn cOPS alone...

  • @ZzRvXzZ Such an intelligent reply. You have to be a cop.

  • @outlawracer2229

    Grow a fucking brain, what's the point on going into a random guard and start fiming him... she's abviously searching for trouble... SHE isn't having her freedom taken alway, she is just being a fucking retard to call attention because she doesn't get enoguh penis to the vagina.

    The guy is just doing his fucking job... imagine if you were working as a cop... risking your life everyday... and some fat ugly bitch comes to you and start filming you and disrespecting you, huh?

  • @ZzRvXzZ Well genius. I happen to work with the public quite a bit as an EMT. Thank God I was never stupid enough to become a cop.

  • @outlawracer2229

    yeah yeah... all police officers are stupid.

  • @ZzRvXzZ Never said that. It's just the ones on power trips that forgot the oath they took.

  • @ZzRvXzZ nazis were just doing their job too

  • @ceet34

    lunatic.

  • He knows he is lying or he would have stopped her.

  • Fuck you federal government!!! we dont believe in you anymore, corrupted pigs!

  • Video taping and taking pictures isn't some "conspiracy," it just looks like you surveying the area so you can blow it up. Terrorists do it everyday. :D

  • Comment removed

  • who gives a shit if you film or not?? What harm is going to do.

  • if you videotape that building now, you can be thrown in prison indefinitely without trial on suspected terrorism claims

  • @jarvisofnewyork lol why?

  • @12NadaSurf12 look up NDAA

  • @jarvisofnewyork did you read the article from above?

  • @jarvisofnewyork N.D.A.A?

  • He can't be for real- look at the flag on his right shoulder. The field of blue should be leading. It's bass-ackwards.

  • so you were there to support a man who comitted treason and caused the deaths of brave american soliders and allies ?

    you have a right to film federal property but you dont have a right to be a treasonous cunt.

  • @Katoosha2006 That's cause Americans don't know loyalty to their own country anymore until things go wrong then they want the same people they betray to protect them.

  • @xDvsking666x Oh we have loyalty, but not to power-tripping "authoritites" who wish we were a police state. Just because we defend our rights and don't let ourelves get molested by our government doesn't mean we're not loyal, it means we have brains :)

  • @noose357 You can have a brain and still not over or under exercise your rights, Look at other civilized countries some of them are just like the US just different languages and laws, The cops in Russia are way worse so why keep pushing it and using the one other thing that makes the US different? I know that there are some pretty dicky cops out there but don't do things that is going to attract attention if you don't want / need it, Do you get what I'm saying?

  • @xDvsking666x 1st, thanks for replying without attitude, I'm glad you understood what I was trying to say. 2nd, I do get what you're saying, but I disagree with it. There are too many cases in the U.S. of police/authorities blatantly disregarding our constitutional rights and avoiding justice. Filming police interactions not only protects the public, but it also protects those authorities who are just doing their job. Either way, it makes all filmed parties more aware of their words and actions.

  • @noose357 Your very welcome I'm just trying to be one of the few who don't answer with attitude or insults, That is true and It is a problem that should be dealt with however If we can show the people the bad cops then we should show the world the good ones who know how to act and know the rights of the people, My fear is that only showing them disregarding civilian rights and acting out will trigger a backlash, I also seen regular people abusing rights so each party is at fault kinda

  • @noose357 I give some of these men and women credit for taking up a job that most can't/wouldn't want to do and to know that everyday your at higher chance to be killed in a senseless act of violence or trying to save someone as well as those who are returning from serving their country, I just think focus should be on the good just as it is on the bad.

  • @xDvsking666x There is a lot of focus on the good by the Government propaganda and not enough cases of bad which are supressed.

  • @Tzimnewman3 Not enough bad propaganda? You can find more things about the government being evil etc than the good things it's done as well as the people who work for them, I find more info and videos on cops and stuff being filmed without reason just as some kindly not to be filmed, Example, I saw this video of some guy filming a couple officers out of the blue and then zooming in on the officers name, That is just as disrespectful as them asking you to put the camera away imo.

  • @Tzimnewman3 Part 2, Why would someone do that anyway police officers are people too so don't they have rights too? With people claiming their rights being abused then going and abusing someone else what the point of having any?

  • @xDvsking666x

    when they put on that uniform they are no longer one of the people, just like when a soldier puts on his uniform. that is the way it is nowadays, the police are like the military, they are an coccupying force, its really sad.

    they have rights, but nobody has a right to not be filmed in a public place, espescially not a police officer.

    we are filmed by cctv all the time, i never gave permission....besides the police have no right to tell you what to do.

  • @robin22391 Police are not like soldiers and the military acts as a occupying force cause people can never decide what they want, Take away all the military take away all the police and lets see how long stability remains with a public just a divided than ever before, cctvs wouldn't be needed if people didn't steal or harm anyone or trespass they are a invasion of privacy but they have been helpful. There are places and people way worse in the world so why all this?

  • @mrpoofz actually my state includes TSA in the statute that grants powers of arrest.

  • Interesting, every federal, county, state office is paid for by we the people. Sooo, we have every right to film them. Matter of fact all taxpayers fund every law enforcement from the county sheriff up to the TSA. On the taxypayers nickel, all of them. We own them and they work for US.

  • @oakand I'm sorry, but the fact that you called TSA Law Enforcement just made me laugh for days. Well played, sir.

  • @MrCheesyPoofz Did have a bit of a freudian moment there. Hate to call a made up organisation important. Especially, since we fund them to behave the way they do. You know I could run for the presidency and win if my platform was yes I, Personally I am a pig so have a great time digging up my past, but I want to defund and close down the TSA and cut taxes.

    Hello President Oakand :-)

  • who said you can't tape a federal building. the white house is a federal building. STOP EVERY TOURIST SO THEY CANT PHOTO THE BLACK HOUSE>

  • Search "federal officer detains photographer" for more on this subject. Including a comment about how the detainee was personally called by the FPS area commander and apologized to over this behavior.

  • He is in front of a federal building and the patch of the U.S. Flag on his 'Right' arm is backwards. The U.S. Flag is reversed(Stars on the Right, Stripes on the Left) when placed on the right side of uniforms and vehicles. ((Looks like you are moving into the wind so you are seeing the other side of the U.S. Flag...))

  • usflag.org/flagpatch.html

  • Comment removed

  • nicely done!

  • They don't want you video taping because you could be video taping to plan an attack on the video, don't be so fucking picky you fuckin hippie

  • All of you people go around putting cameras up into peoples faces and then claim its my right its my right. Cameras are great for docuementing a event or creating a memory ect. but that is not why most of the videographers are doing. They are using the camera as a intimidation tool and if it was used against them in the same manner they use it on every cop or in other person they tape and plaster all over youtube they would be offended to. My rights, my rights, my rights. What about their rights

  • @Txgomeric As both public officials and citizens, they have no reasonable expectation of privacy while in public. As such, the guards / cops could return the favor and use cameras if they so choose.

    Nobody has the right to not be offended, and that includes law enforcement of all kinds.

  • @pabnaful you want to bitch so much? Leave the US and go live in another country.

  • I am sure its not always the case but neither is it always the case that they are trying to hide and cover something up

  • procedures to exploit them...anyone remember Pearl Harbor? The Japanese sent in undercover spies to tape the harbor and other key assets in order to plan their attack. So what's to say that Al Qaeda can't have an average looking person trying to video tape federal buildings or police to find their weaknesses out? also, with taping cops, maybe it is just something about having one more person's safety to worry about when they are trying to do their job?

  • did anyone think that maybe the reason that cops dont want to be video taped or video taping or federal buildings might have something to do with terrorism?? Stay with me here..I know its a stretch with the taping of cops, but think what our military does? or even our police when they are investigating criminal organizations..they tape them to look for weak points and area's to exploit to their benefits. so, conversely, the police must be on alert for someone to tape our buildings and ....

  • @mrandall101010 Could be, but the rights of a citizen come first. If they have the right to videotape / record something, then they can elect to use that right and not back down because some guy in a hat with a badge tells them not to do it.

    If we all give up rights because of the vague threat of terrorism, then we have no rights to fight for, and that eliminates the whole point of our supposed form of civilization.

  • pretty sure this and all other "federal" buildings like it are on google earth, is that not a photograph?

  • You must think.you are a bad ass huh?

  • May I ask why is it that fights are picked anywho? Why bother than man, who happens to be guarding the building, by filming him and argueing with him. And why do people try to bring international politics into this? I'm sure there isn't a "Cops, Security Guards, and Politicans Club" that they all meet at to try to destroy the world. I think you guys have too much free time to be argueing with authorites and to be discussing some every politican hates people and is a murder type of discussion.

  • @USAFFuturePilot exactly right all there doing is trying to stir something up and then intimidate the responding offical into doing somthing they can cry foul over. It is nothing but intimidation by camera. If you are some sort of journalist making a story, or a sight seeing it would be different. They targeted a building knowing full well it would cause a problem and then try to goad the security into a confrontation so they can record it.

  • @Txgomeric It is pointless anyway, because they make the arguement that all of these cops take peoples cameras away and do things illegal off camera to them IE throw the in detention centers, yet somehow there is a thousand videos showing the exact opposite.

  • @Txgomeric The best way for the guard / cop to avoid the problem would be to avoid the confrontation completely.

    The person with the camera was doing nothing illegal, so leave her alone and there is nothing to complain about on either side.

    Was she trying to force a confrontation? I don't know, but if she was, it could have easily been avoided by not confronting her for a legal act.

  • If you're not on the property, you can shoot whatever you want. If you're on the property and are asked to leave, step out on the city sidewalk and knock yourself out. Basically, if it's in public view, they can't stop you. Trust me.

  • Sheep that guy is a sheeple wtf is this world comeing to ? Hey heres a news flash for you sheep your kids are going to have to grow up in the nightmare police state you are enforcing why don't you stop acting like a little boy and grow a pair do what's best for your kids not the coorporation!!!!

  • cops don't like to be videotaped because they don't want their crimes caught on tape like the elites in the western world who somehow avoids going to international criminal court. elites and cops are partners in crimes who don't want to leave any evidence behind for their crimes.

  • @pabnaful this isnt a cop, its a private security guard hired by GSA. They know nothing.

  • @pabnaful would you like a fuckin camera pointed in your face while you are working?

  • @fatprick44 If I am in public, I have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

    Would I like a camera in my face? No, I wouldn't. And if I had one, I would walk away and into a private area.

    A guard or cop who comes out of a building to talk to you gives up the reasonable expectation of privacy. He could have not come out if he didn't want to be on camera or have it stuck in his face.

    He chose to confront her, so it becomes his problem to deal with.

  • @pabnaful

    "elites in the western world?" (sic)

    I'm not challenging the basic point, but, I hope that you are not trying to suggest that it isn't even worse elsewhere where, say, no one has any tape.

  • @pabnaful you my friend sound REALLY stupid!

  • their time with people like you. I do believe that you may tape and photograph areas accessible to the public, while the area is open for public use, so you are not wrong(I think there was a time where you could not but was challenged in court and thus changed), but if you were there for a planned protest, then that is what you should have focused your videotaping skills on, and not this clip which shows nothing of prior contact or actions. Now I have wasted over 35 secs of my life to this vid.

  • This was a waste of 35 seconds of my life. With the 10th anniversary of one of the worst days of our nation just behind us, I find it ridiculous that people such as yourself do not have anything better to do with your time then get into a minor argument of taping the front of a federal building. Law enforcement and security have their hands full of protecting these properties, the people that work there, and the people that visit them, such as yourself, that they don't need to be wasting

  • he tried to intimidate you, then when he saw it wouldn't work and that you were right, he ducked away like a sissy

  • obviously, federal law enforcement interperate the rules as follows which is not true. In the minds of a security guard or federal police officer "It shall be Unlawful to make any photograph, sketch, picture, drawing, map or graphical representation of any property owned or controlled by the federal government, even from public property". That is not a real law, its what security and law enforcement think it is.

  • Don't tape the building or get thrown in jail. Seems simple. What a twit.

  • @Trumethodology Except that it's an unlawful order. It may seem simple to simple minds but we have this thing called the US Constitution which prohibits the government from telling us the Employer, what we can and can't do in certain instances. Go check out Google Maps, I bet you there is a picture of the building there. The government has no authority to block our first amendment rights, but that might make things too complicated for your simple mind.

  • Or in America there must be something similar--check for it.

  • By LAW they can't stop you from taping in any public place. Look up the laws around this--I carry a pamphlet with the relevant laws and hand it out when necessary.

    Get one at ambient light website

  • they love to lie every chance they get .

  • yahoo...no speakin engles.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more