Giuliani's only card is he was there the day the towers fell. Americans are sick of him using 9/11 as his campaign strategy. His Nextel deal says axactly where his head is: Greed and profiteering off the lives of New Yorkers and that horrible event.
Hey everyone. Let's just do what the terrorists want. Let's pull out of the middle east and yield to their demands and maybe, just maybe, they'll leave us alone....
Exactly! Let's just tell them, "you can do whatever you want and we'll stay out of your way." They'll leave us alone right? I mean they probably won't bomb us if we're nice to them. Hey! We should have done that in WWII!! We should have told the Nazis and Japanese they could do whatever THEY wanted. Maybe millions of people wouldn't have died.. Right?
I don't think America intentially funds known psychopaths. People like Saddam were allies against Iran at a time Saddam had no record of humanitarian attrocities and agression against other nations. We supported Japan before they committed their attrocities in the 1930s. You're asking the wrong questions. The question you should be asking is, "how do we prevent another 9/11?"
Dear lord, do you know ANYTHING about Saddam? Even back in 1963 he was a brutal murderer. He murdered president qassem and in 1968 took over iraq. He then went on a purge of thousands of iraqs, and in 1976 executed dozens of iraqi parliament members. In 1988 he poison gassed 4 kurd villages yet still got new loans from Ronald Reagan in 1989. you need a history lesson.
Sorry safage, it is you who needs the history lesson. It is true that America turned a blind eye to most savage dictators. But Saddam was not a threat beyond his borders (except against Iran which was a favorable position for America's interest). After Saddam invaded Kuwait while attacking Saudi Arabia and Isreal, he became a danger. When 9/11 happened, it became clear that brutal dictators must not gain the capability to attack America. Saddam had to go.
The USA installed saddam hussein into power (iraq). The usa installed the shah into power (iran). The USA installed Khadaffi into power (libya). The USA installed Siad Barre into power (somalia). If you don't see the pattern here I can't help you.
First, savagesteve13, the US did not install Saddam into power. We supported him against Iran at a time Saddam has not yet killed thousands of Kurds and invaded Kuwait. Also, there is no scrap of evidence that the US installed Khadaffi into power either. You need more than my help. You need to get your facts straight.
That's not the point at issue. Some people we support turn out to be bad guys. But that doesn't make people like savagesteve13 right to falsify information to prove a point. Karzai of Afghanistan may turn out to be bad for all I know, but so far he's done a lot of good. The mistakes America has made in who they support does not give terrorists a pass to carry out intentional killing of innocents.
and even after all those things you just mentioned, (savagesteve13), we still felt the need to back the "murderer", and gave him weapons in his war with Iran. And now that Saddam is dead, both the Sunnis and Shias who are killing each other want us gone from Iraq. Tell me, how are we going to solve everyone elses problems when we can't even solve our own: (Katrina disaster clean up, Health care, job losses, immagration).
Kasak, I never said America was perfect, but we cannot ignore the threats against us and only focus within. We need to do both. Second, attacks are way down in Iraq and naturally everyone wants American troops out of Iraq but that must happen after the terrorists lose their ability to take over iraq. Job losses? 4.5 percent unemployment is a record low!
We prevent another 911 by not taking sides with some countries based on economic and strategic gain, and then making enemies of other countries who don't support our imperialistic views. We stop secretly training individuals who in the future will use their CIA skills to commit terror attacks against us. We stop playing TEAM AMERICA world policeman, and start dealing with our own problems in our own country.
What good did 9/11 do the terrorists if they lied about the reasons they did it? Nobody EVER said it was because of our lifestyle. Rudy is apparently too stupid to understand the TRUTH.
After Bush, I think it´s dangerous and irresponsable to judge candidates on their looks,the way they speak or even their age.I don´t think those are the most important issues riht now.Maybe if we weren´t so concerned with people´s image,as dictated by the media,we would live in a healthier society. Alternatively,there are always speech coaches and stylists which can help "sell" one´s image.
the women beeing interviewed is a perfect exemple oh a dumb liberal looks like and im not very conservative at all, talking about the machine, magic... and wtf ever candidates wtf is that ? hilary is a fucking lying machine thats for sure ohhh and the how they look thing as if a president needs to be a beuty contest winner, disgusting realy, discuss real issues like RON PAUL DOES!
Great, show! Some good reasoned debate. And I'm sorry, I do really like Ron Paul. If I was in a party I would be in the 'small gov., small church' party. Both government and church are fine just don't try and dominate everything. Anyone with me?
Fair and balanced? It focused on a few candidates. It was apparent they had an agenda, and they squashed any true debate as evident with cutting of Ron Paul. Furthermore they asked the basic bs questions about abortion and only solicited canned responses.
You have a good point, but I was pointing at Wallace's insistance on getting answers out. They did not allow the actual 'debate' on foreign-policy blowback continue; which was unfortunate. I think that Paul had a lot more in common with Regan than any of the others that invoked his name.
Ron Paul is the only candidate can save our country...Fox News cant accept that Ron won the debate... but american people is waking up every day thanks to internet
Alright a credible source crediting Ron Paul. It is so obvious that those who bash Ron Paul will get a nice surprise when he stands in the Oval Office. He is a straight shooter with a message to the world.
If you are pressed for time and want to hear what they had to say about Ron Paul you could pretty much skip the first 10 min. and the last 5 min. of this video.
is that really the question?
or is the question, has the growing power of the government dumbed us down? wouldn't that be their goal?
misled775 4 years ago
Any honest person knows Ron Paul is the only candidate who will help the US.
darktiduss 4 years ago
Giuliani's only card is he was there the day the towers fell. Americans are sick of him using 9/11 as his campaign strategy. His Nextel deal says axactly where his head is: Greed and profiteering off the lives of New Yorkers and that horrible event.
Ron Paul 2008.
ladalang 4 years ago 4
Hey everyone. Let's just do what the terrorists want. Let's pull out of the middle east and yield to their demands and maybe, just maybe, they'll leave us alone....
eldorama 4 years ago
What a concept: get you boot off their neck and they'll stop shaking their fist at you. Brilliant!
briggsmedia 4 years ago
Exactly! Let's just tell them, "you can do whatever you want and we'll stay out of your way." They'll leave us alone right? I mean they probably won't bomb us if we're nice to them. Hey! We should have done that in WWII!! We should have told the Nazis and Japanese they could do whatever THEY wanted. Maybe millions of people wouldn't have died.. Right?
eldorama 4 years ago
Why are we in the middle east?
savagesteve13 4 years ago
because that's where bin laden and all those other psychopaths reside.
eldorama 4 years ago
Okay, and why did we fund and train Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, Mohammed Barre, in the 1980's if they are such psychopaths.
savagesteve13 4 years ago 3
I don't think America intentially funds known psychopaths. People like Saddam were allies against Iran at a time Saddam had no record of humanitarian attrocities and agression against other nations. We supported Japan before they committed their attrocities in the 1930s. You're asking the wrong questions. The question you should be asking is, "how do we prevent another 9/11?"
eldorama 4 years ago
Dear lord, do you know ANYTHING about Saddam? Even back in 1963 he was a brutal murderer. He murdered president qassem and in 1968 took over iraq. He then went on a purge of thousands of iraqs, and in 1976 executed dozens of iraqi parliament members. In 1988 he poison gassed 4 kurd villages yet still got new loans from Ronald Reagan in 1989. you need a history lesson.
savagesteve13 4 years ago 3
Sorry safage, it is you who needs the history lesson. It is true that America turned a blind eye to most savage dictators. But Saddam was not a threat beyond his borders (except against Iran which was a favorable position for America's interest). After Saddam invaded Kuwait while attacking Saudi Arabia and Isreal, he became a danger. When 9/11 happened, it became clear that brutal dictators must not gain the capability to attack America. Saddam had to go.
eldorama 4 years ago
The USA installed saddam hussein into power (iraq). The usa installed the shah into power (iran). The USA installed Khadaffi into power (libya). The USA installed Siad Barre into power (somalia). If you don't see the pattern here I can't help you.
savagesteve13 4 years ago 3
First, savagesteve13, the US did not install Saddam into power. We supported him against Iran at a time Saddam has not yet killed thousands of Kurds and invaded Kuwait. Also, there is no scrap of evidence that the US installed Khadaffi into power either. You need more than my help. You need to get your facts straight.
eldorama 4 years ago
The point eldorama, that savagesteve13 is making is that people who we support in foreign countries often turn out to be not such good guys.
glorfindel17 4 years ago
That's not the point at issue. Some people we support turn out to be bad guys. But that doesn't make people like savagesteve13 right to falsify information to prove a point. Karzai of Afghanistan may turn out to be bad for all I know, but so far he's done a lot of good. The mistakes America has made in who they support does not give terrorists a pass to carry out intentional killing of innocents.
eldorama 4 years ago
But it does mean we have to be smarter.
glorfindel17 4 years ago
and even after all those things you just mentioned, (savagesteve13), we still felt the need to back the "murderer", and gave him weapons in his war with Iran. And now that Saddam is dead, both the Sunnis and Shias who are killing each other want us gone from Iraq. Tell me, how are we going to solve everyone elses problems when we can't even solve our own: (Katrina disaster clean up, Health care, job losses, immagration).
Kasak1984 4 years ago
Kasak, I never said America was perfect, but we cannot ignore the threats against us and only focus within. We need to do both. Second, attacks are way down in Iraq and naturally everyone wants American troops out of Iraq but that must happen after the terrorists lose their ability to take over iraq. Job losses? 4.5 percent unemployment is a record low!
eldorama 4 years ago
We prevent another 911 by not taking sides with some countries based on economic and strategic gain, and then making enemies of other countries who don't support our imperialistic views. We stop secretly training individuals who in the future will use their CIA skills to commit terror attacks against us. We stop playing TEAM AMERICA world policeman, and start dealing with our own problems in our own country.
Kasak1984 4 years ago
RpR
PandoraLeigh 4 years ago
Ron Paul R3v0_|ution
misfitt13888 4 years ago
Ron Paul R3v0_|ution
varange2 4 years ago
Ron Paul R3v0_|ution
misfitt13888 4 years ago
What good did 9/11 do the terrorists if they lied about the reasons they did it? Nobody EVER said it was because of our lifestyle. Rudy is apparently too stupid to understand the TRUTH.
retrop75 4 years ago
RON PAUL 08! THE REVOLUTION IS COMING!
kondoboy 4 years ago
Go Ron Go!
chunksloth 4 years ago
Good interview, Go Ron Paul!
abitar1 4 years ago
After Bush, I think it´s dangerous and irresponsable to judge candidates on their looks,the way they speak or even their age.I don´t think those are the most important issues riht now.Maybe if we weren´t so concerned with people´s image,as dictated by the media,we would live in a healthier society. Alternatively,there are always speech coaches and stylists which can help "sell" one´s image.
heathazed 4 years ago
Thank you for the video. Until today I have never heard of Mr. Briggs. Thank God for youtube
dbassam 4 years ago
i second that motion
Sinistertino 4 years ago
the women beeing interviewed is a perfect exemple oh a dumb liberal looks like and im not very conservative at all, talking about the machine, magic... and wtf ever candidates wtf is that ? hilary is a fucking lying machine thats for sure ohhh and the how they look thing as if a president needs to be a beuty contest winner, disgusting realy, discuss real issues like RON PAUL DOES!
Gargar0th 4 years ago
Great, show! Some good reasoned debate. And I'm sorry, I do really like Ron Paul. If I was in a party I would be in the 'small gov., small church' party. Both government and church are fine just don't try and dominate everything. Anyone with me?
pjdude 4 years ago
Fair and balanced? It focused on a few candidates. It was apparent they had an agenda, and they squashed any true debate as evident with cutting of Ron Paul. Furthermore they asked the basic bs questions about abortion and only solicited canned responses.
silkheat 4 years ago
You have a good point, but I was pointing at Wallace's insistance on getting answers out. They did not allow the actual 'debate' on foreign-policy blowback continue; which was unfortunate. I think that Paul had a lot more in common with Regan than any of the others that invoked his name.
briggsmedia 4 years ago
Not a bad show by the end.
PeekyBooo 4 years ago
She does come around to make cuase for Ron Paul, but she keeps saying no one is good enough.
PeekyBooo 4 years ago
Who is this women? She didn't find an substance in the debate to take home for the kids! So the upholding of the Constitution isn't good enough?
Don't trust this women. Obviosuly a pro Zionist.
PeekyBooo 4 years ago
nah, just a those dumb liberals that have no substance.
Gargar0th 4 years ago
Where/when does this program air?
Seeroftheavatar 4 years ago
Manchester NH channel 23 Friday's 9:30 PM and Sunday's 8:00 AM. Thanks for viewing!
briggsmedia 4 years ago
Ron Paul. You are our only hope! May the force be with you.
xenosent 4 years ago
Ron Paul is the only candidate can save our country...Fox News cant accept that Ron won the debate... but american people is waking up every day thanks to internet
xicalintrue123 4 years ago
Almost every report defends Ron Paul. Thus the views of the American People are being heard and thank god they are SANE responses!
Wolfsheim23 4 years ago
Alright a credible source crediting Ron Paul. It is so obvious that those who bash Ron Paul will get a nice surprise when he stands in the Oval Office. He is a straight shooter with a message to the world.
takadi 4 years ago
Ron Paul is speaking the facts backed up by official reports.
Ron Paul is consistant.
Ron Paul is a true Republican.
Mr. Briggs, thanks for this video.
slayerknd 4 years ago
Right on! - Ron is a real Conservative! Wake em up!
radiofriendly 4 years ago
If you are pressed for time and want to hear what they had to say about Ron Paul you could pretty much skip the first 10 min. and the last 5 min. of this video.
libertylover1 4 years ago