Added: 3 years ago
From: MikeyGonebad
Views: 15,903
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • demolition by cia-qaeda plc!!

  • mushroom clouds^^

  • Here is beautiful, newly surfaced footage of the detonation charges exploding

    your a fucken bawbag how the fuck is this beautiful, sick fuck

  • The idea that an airplane hits a building and that's what happens an hour later is preposterous. Absurd. Laughable. I can't believe people still believe it. I mean how dumb and brainwashed by action movies do you have to be?

  • The zoom and pans on this footage are done in post production. The camera doesn't change its position. Somebody took the footage and enlarged it and moved it around to fake the zoom and pans.

  • @tornadomad even a demolish building falls not faster than debris! But is allmost freefall, compare it to a building with CD! It's the same time for a 110 floor building!

  • now if people who see this video cant see the charges going off its not because they arent ther eits because they dont want to see them

  • CD!

  • this was not freefall speed... the debris fell faster than the towers

  • If the building is falling at freefall speeds, why are parts of the top already hitting the ground before most of the building has even collapsed yet?

  • @TimeLapseSteve Nobody in their right mind has ever said the towers fell at freefall speed. Many have noted that they fell at NEAR freefall speed. It should be clearly obvious to anyone, though, that they met FAR less resistance than they would have if it was simply gravity vs materials.

  • Very powerfull controlled demolition , stupid blind donkey who can't see this.

  • DEMOLITION lol more like terrorism! ...some of u are still in shock there are Islamic terrorists out to get us ...long before 911. ..and bla bla bla, i know the loose baised facts of all the ignorant conspiracy truthers mambo jambo regarding this lol..

  • @ummGirlful i didnt know bush was muslim

  • This building was an obvious controlled demolition job.

  • Poor America, people are waisting precious time in this fake video discussion, people don't trust NASA (moon landings are being impeached), sheer panic and disillusion are being spread around. We need unity and optimism - watch and listen to some nice things: Vangelis, ELP, Ping Floyd, Hair etc. *** Harmony and understanding,

    Sympathy and trust abounding,

    No more falsehoods or derisions,

    Golden living dreams of visions

    Mystic crystal revalation

    And the mind's true liberation...

    *******

  • Israel is a curse on the United States. How and why did we ever become the backer of this terrorist nation? Why were the American People kept in the dark and fed lies about it for so many years? As we ask the real questions, we are finding out why and it is time to act.

  • people who dont intervene are also guilty!

  • I hope that George W. Bush will pay back one day. He earns to get fucked.

  • I blame the filthy zionists and dual-Israeli citizens who have hi-jacked the US gov't (PNAC) and the jew central bankers and war profiteers that make up the bulk of Bilderberg......blame well placed.

  • NOW THAT WE HAVE PROOF THAT SUPER-THERMITE PULVERIZED THE TWIN TOWERS, WHAT DO WE DO There is no doubt that Israel is using phosphorous bombs over Gaza. Israel is flagrantly violating the Fourth Geneva Convention," says Raji Sourani, head of the Palestinian Center for Human Rights in Gaza. "This is not the first time we have documented Israel using this kind of prohibited weapon against Gaza's civilian population," Sourani told IPS by phone from Gaza.

  • masses of charges going off, clearly visible

  • @freidenki "masses of charges going off, clearly visible " I cant see a singel one.

    I see a lot of paper reflections.

    However, I do see a 110storey steel/concrete skyskraper pulverized.

  • @roxxphatcox you see paper cause thats what YOU wantto see, thats called cutter charges

  • @kixxclub Well, I have had my share of experience with explosives charges. What you see is : Paper, glass reflecting sunlight. Not explosions that would result in pressure waves with debris scattering either direction and possible smoke trails, especially if it was directional cutter charges. Having hundreds of cutter charges going of after the collapse would be the demolition misfire of the century. The towers were without a shred of doubt demolished, but wrong is wrong, right is right.

  • Don't ya think that people in the World Trade Centers would have noticed a demo crew, wire, structural weakening, wire, dynamite, wire..... you know all the things it takes to implode a building? This is bullshit.

  • Ok. Obviously they wanted this a secret. Otherwise we would drag them out in the streets and hang them from light poles. So you answer your own question. Would you think it wise, if you were trying to demolish a building so you could start a war and increase your profits for all the companies you're invested in (oil, war, banks). Would you think it wise to make it an obvious demo crew? Or would you rather make them look like elevator repairmen?

  • Anyways. Don't be so thick headed. It's obvious by looking at the collapse that the core was cut from the third skylobby. After that it's just about taking out the core in the second sky lobby, then the main lobby. You can see the fucking spire collapse from the BOTTOM. Not the top, as you are led to believe. This is not a progressive collapse. It is a melting agent (possibly silent). Wire. Haha. If you were the richest person in the world would you use wire? Your ignorance is bullshit.

  • 2 Questions i have from this video and anyone please feel free to answer.

    1: The title explains how it "imploded" yet the debris clearly falls away from the centre.

    2: The discription suggests that it was a demolition yet we can clearly see that the core collums for 1/3 of the building remained intact for a while so it could not have been pulled down but mearly fell down.

  • I could change the title and description to something of your liking .... but it won't change all the testimony of hundreds who heard, felt and saw exposions blowing out the central columns (ie lobby and basement level destruction) before any plane even struck the building, during the hour it stood after the plane hit and seconds right before the "collapse".

    Your turn now....explain away the pyroclastic flow & fine powder without the prescence of explosives....we're all waiting.

  • Nice try but you still failled to answer the questions. Next!

  • But i will answer your question. Hundreds heard, felt and saw the core collums explode?? Hmm right!! anyone that close would be dead so unless your talking to ghosts then your lying. Put a brick into a cement mixer with a load of steel and see if it stays intact!

    These questions are basic you really have to try harder.

    And just to give you a chance i will listen to these witnesses if you can give me the source please.

  • Roths. Why is it so hard for you to believe that the core was cut in the third skylobby? Then the second skylobby? Then the lobby? How do you explain the basement being in the shape it was in. How do you explain the glass in lobby of WTC1 and 2 being broken out? This is obviously a demolition with some remote planes. Once those cores go. The building goes. Also explains why the piece of building that was about to fall off the side ended up sucking back into the center then exploded.

  • You are joking are you?? Firstly you need to actually study the towers and you would find that there is no "third sky looby". How do you tell the difference between the glass that blew out and the glass that fell?? are you a glass expert??? And did you never notice that the core collums stayed intact for a while after the buildings fell? as for the basement well it stands to reason that that much debris fallling would pretty much cause some damage. Come back when you know what your talking about

  • Haha. That's it? You correct my mistake of calling the second skylobby and third skylobby. Oh shit. So sorry. I made a mistake I must not know what I'm talking about. I have studied the towers and it seems like the most reasonable way for them to fall. Cause only a fucking idiot would think they feel on their own. Eye witness accounts say glass was blown out on both lobbys. "Looked like a bomb went off in the lobby". Or right below it eh? You said it yourself. The cores stood for awhile.

  • And please when you talk about the spire being "intact for awhile", don't act like those cores just began to fall apart in a disorderly fashion. They failed at the very bottom and fell straight into themselves. In tact the whole way down. I'll say it one more time because you seem like an idiot. THEY FAILED FROM THE BOTTOM. Not from a fire, not from plane damage. FROM THE BOTTOM. Talk about controlled demolition. Ugh. Please wake the fuck up. You're making this country dumber.

  • Oh i see. Thanks for clearing that up for me. So let me check i'm right on what your saying.

    The towers fell and then the basement explosives went off??

    Hmm thats not making much sense. Could you spell that out for me as i cant understand your logic.

  • Nahh bro. That's not what I was meaning. Sorry if you took it that way. Of course they would have to break up the basement first. There are at least 3 eye witness accounts that I've seen explaining 2 explosions in the basement when the planes hit. That's 2 for each building. One up top where the plane came in timed exactly with basement. Look at vids man. You can see the thing. The towers fell too fast. You know it. I know it. Everyone knows it. Just some don't want to admit it.

  • ....... Fell down? Are you serious? You can see them walk and then fall straight down onto themselves. That is about 30 floors. They failed at the bottom, where the steel was supposed to be 100% strength. I'm sure you official theorists will come up with another stupid thing like "Oh it must have been the fireball that traveled down the elevator shafts that destroyed the basement and it also weakened those columns so they could fall straight down..." Sounds like you guys doesn't it? ; )

  • The comments on this video are very well manipulated in a certain order so that the comments read in a very different way compared to how the original postings were published.

    Very dodgy...

  • Dodgy? It's youtube man. If you reply to something that isn't on the first comment page your comment will not attach to the one you replied to until it is off the first comment page. Watch your words, watcherofwords.

  • Great footage Mikey! Keep fightin' the good fight, my man. 9-11-North Tower-visible detonations is also great footage, check it out if you haven't already. And let ole Laysoles have it!

  • These theories are rediculous. Suedo science at its best.

  • see the large pillar in the middle that did not collapse? I wonder why/how this went straight down.

  • Ol´Bin´s magic.

  • how tower 7 collapsed i don't know -- it looks suspicious...

  • What´s suspicious about a demolition ?

  • Nothing. Bin Laden always wires up a buildings month in advance of flying jets into them...to assure they will fall neatly into piles of pulverized dust at freefall.

  • I agree. Ol´ Bin is the ultimate magician and he always knows where best to wire up, be it in US administration circles at the service of our chosen masters, or in some out-of-favour highrise buildings which would be way too expensive to dismantle in the traditional unspectacular way.

  • I am not convinced. First of all, the accusation that this was filmed in anticipation of an 'implosion' is without merit. Maybe they were filming because 2 planes hit buildings in there city hours earlier. The 'flashes of light' could be a number of things, so why suspect detonation charges? You can probably find a better way to spend your time, than to ride the conspiracy bus.

  • I think the reason so many people suspect this to be a video of a controlled demolition is Gaileo's Law Of Falling Bodies -that mass doesn't fall into the path of most resistance at free-fall (and into a pile of fine dust)...at least with out explosives moving the mass out of the way. But enough of "casting pearls among swine"...if you wanna remain blind, it's your god given right.

  • Fantastic!!!! I felt like I was there. Awesome!!!

  • The towers werent felled into their own "footprint" though.They were blasted out to a RADIUS of the towers footprint,you know?,a circle around the Towers.

    Unlike WTC 7 which fell into its own footprint which was a classic IMPLOSION albeit using "quieter" devices like nano-thermites to do the job,hence the white smoke,few audible detonations.But the towers were of course EXPLOSIVE demolitions disguised as collapses due to fireIt took NIST YEARS to disguise WTC 7's failure to fire.They failed.YES

  • The demolition procedure of WTC7 was different in that it was imploded from bottom up, while the towers were ex- & imploded from top down. That the towers were indeed demolished there is no reasonable doubt as, one, the towers fell free-fall and, two, they miraculously dissolved into dust, fine dust, and ultra-fine dust instead of collapsing into a mammoth pile of rubble and leaving many storeys of the buildings standing.

  • Agreed.Basic stuff isnt it.

  • Few people understand basic stuff. To see what´s in front of your nose is a constant struggle.

  • WOW!..incredible! One can actualy see visible flashes of light! Detonations!!And the flow of dust!! I always knew those the towers were deleberately demoed with explosives.But this just seals it!

  • Where did you find these videos or where did you get them?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more