The sweet, addictive sound of high tech power and ultimate precision...I don't know why I keep watching this marvel over and over again! Addictive for the ones who realize the engineering achievement reached in the fabrication of these engines......
Imagine this rigged up to a race seat. with a G27 wheel while playing a racing sim. Best set up ever!
I guess the engine is running off telemetry taken from a track and it is replicating exactly what throttle inputs and gear changes were made by the driver. I was trying to guess the circuit. It sounded like it was at Malaysia or China but I could be wrong.
God i wish rotary engines were allowed in F1, a mazda 4 rotor would be an amazing match (even better) then one of these engines. All these bans and rules they have come up with is honestly ruining racing. One day they will all have the same EXACT car, what fun is that going to be? If manufacturers had the ability to use different technology in races like these, think of all the awesome new ideas that would be born from it. Bring back the meaning of racing!!!!
@KDALove Well, its suposed that the aspiration of the pistons "suck" all the fuel, but the modern engines use direct injection into the combustion chamber so it burns cleaner and more efficiently, but I don't know if the new F1 engines use it
Renault won like 90% of the finishes for the 2011 F1 Season... where is the Renault Supercar? imo.. if renault made a production car like F1 based.. it would be better than Ferrari, Lambo, Koenigsegg, Porsche.. their marketing and development team sucks
There was the "Alpine" sportscar brand which was French and relied a lot on Renault parts (used their engines). The Renault Alpine GTA (A610) was around in the mid 80's and had performance comparable to the Porsche 911 and Ferrari 328.
Renault could easily do a V10 engined supercar, but remember that Renault is owned by the French State, and in today's politically correct times, they are only interested in environmentally friendly and frugal city cars. Well, those sell a lot.
@McLarenMercedes odd.. I think Ferrari, Lamborghini, BMW, Mercedes and eq... had the proper marketting or business ppl to make their cars be and go popular world wide.. I think Renault has/had the potential for that same "status" if they had that proper business ppl at the time.. in history..
Non educated guy, for your information Renault is not a "Régie" & is a "SA" = a private trust own for the majority part by private French Investors (Banks & Assurances) since 1990 & the French State is not the owner of Renault since 1994 precisly...
So Renautl is well a private trust now
BUT the politic of the French cars brands is not to build very expensive Super Sport cars for a rare little part of richmen in the world quite simply
@Aly80442 wrong, in the 80's and 90's when they ran 3.0L V10's they did get to about 1k bhp, but now they don't. Since FIA limited the engines to 2.4 V8's they get to about 760 bhp. FIA are going to restrict it even further in 2012 to Turbocharged 1.6L V6's.
@mjazy981 The FIA has announced the intention to the change the 2.4-litre V8 engines to 1.6 litre 6 cylinder turbo engines, containing fuel flow restrictions and including energy recovery systems in order to make Formula One more environmentally aware and to attract more commercial partners for 2014.
For the 2006 season and on, the engines had to be 90° V8 of 2.4 litres.
@mikeb1444 Have you heard of the one engine for every weekend agreement in formula one? If the have to rebuild it after 3 days of use then it will never work in a road car.
@mikeb1444 They are WAY too loud to be put in road cars, and they get terrible mileage. Also, as I can see people have already said, they don't last long. You can get about 600 miles maximum out of 1 engine.
They can get rid of the pneumatic valve assembly, switch to a piston with a taller crown, and cut the rev limit to 10-12K. Using parts with more slack will make the engine just as reliable as any other car.
Us the French Fans of our French Sport brands are dispointed year after year to dont see our French brands who do a perfect French Rules in the professional Sport cars competitions in the world (F1 --> Renault best engine, WRC --> WC Citroen Racing, "Le Mans Series" --> WC Peugeot Sport, a perfect French Rules yes ^^) made also French Super Sport cars in the same hight level sport
Sure the little part of very richmen are not the objectives of our brands but SHIT made that!!
@partofdword they will produce (be limited to) around 800hp (1.6L inline 4 turbos), nothing funny about it. Durring the 1986 turbo era, the 1.5L Lotus-Renault engines put out 1,400hp in qualifying trim. Let engine size not fool you. In F1, with the money they have, anything is possible.
@jamsstar2010 you are correct. The injectors that are shown in the video are the secondary injectors and they only supply fuel past a certain RPM because the primaries can't supply the amount of fuel the engine requires at the higher RPM's. Any high revving engine will normally have secondary injectors including most Super Sport Motorcycles.
hmm some say fuel some say water............can we have an expert please?lots of people think they know the answer,how they know unless their an F1 engine builder i dont know.maybe its injecting magic!!!!
@toaster1971 trust me...my motorcycle has the lowest torque in all of the 600's but because of it's power to weigh ratio it will haul ass... so shut your mouth before you talk. are you a car tech like me?
@ChevySilverado90 dude so you're going around talking down to people? shame on you...and for your info those are individual port injections shooting fuel directly into those individual butterfly valves...which they should've done direct injection for but who knows why they didn't...i know some bmw cars have individual valves and they also uses VANOS for their variable valve system which uses solenoids instead of a camshaft.....SO STFU GTFO....no internet points for you! thumbs down for u
@bobscanfly *Individual port injectors* Which has nothing to do with the question asked. They use an ALPHA-N system that estimates engine loading based on throttle position and engine speed. The reason why they dont do DI is cause the engine speeds at the moment are too fast for a DI system to correctly function. In 2013 they might but speeds will be limited to 12,000 rpm. BMW cars with VVT has nothing to do with F1, mainly cause the formula states that they can't use VVT or Variable intakes.
@ChevySilverado90 potato - po-ta-to...same shit...i don't really care for how F1 works...cuz i don't work on F1's...but since you're high and mighty you must be working for F1
@toaster1971 Regardless of what some old timer told you, high tq is not necessary for high acceleration. Gearing and RPM can make that comment totally old, lame and obsolete... if tq was so necessary the motor in this video would be a dog and it certainly isnt.
@donperry1 It is. To get the best out of the car they put the fuel injectors outside of the engine intake so the fuel can atomise properly and not form into droplets like most cars these days. It also gives more volumetric efficiency to the best part of about 95-100%
@countavery, I suggest you fo a little investigation before replying to this, I just checked and the CBR250 had a redline of 19k with conventional valve springs, maybe your getting confused with the Honda CB250?? I think that had a redline of 8k
@ mike6984, what are you talking about?? First of all these are pneumatic valves not hydraulic and conventional valve sprung valve train has bee used in road going motorbikes well 15k RPM for years, in fact I think the old Honda CBR250 had a redline of 20k
@MrTrickymex 15k is a little different than 20k. Honda CBR250 had a 9000rpm redline. Perhaps you are thinking of the Honda RS250, but thats a 2 stroke.
@mike3684 well the valves are pressurized by oil, not springs. If u had regular valves taken off of a street car the f1 couldn't go past idle speed. What blows me away is the injectors.
@stlchevy95 really, i knew about hydrolic valving but i was under the impression that it was still an experimental thing... and yeah no doubt most stock springs are good to about 7500 max, not 10-20k... cool to know tho, thanks!
i think its amazing how ther can get accurate timing and spark at that RPM, and still not float any valves... its my opinion that all engines should have desmodromic valving... best invantion since the TV...
That is the engine of the GODS!!!! Nothing beats the F1 racing engines! I would love to see an F1 go up against a Top-Fuel dragster! That would be a fun thing to watch!!
@PlayTilTheyBleed Are you kidding? Top Fuel dragsters now have 8000 hp (eight thousand) - ten times the Renault's. They go from a standing start to 330 mph in 4.5 seconds in the most amazing manner. Engine sound of the Gods? Ever been to Top Fuel event? I remember the first time I did; the only word that describes the sound is "violent". It compressed my chest each time a cylinder fired (1000 hp each). 500-inch V-8's. Nitromethane fuel. No contest...
@beeroosterm Are you kidding? How are you comparing an 8+ liter engine drinking nitromethane and forcefed by a supercharger put together by mechanics to a 2.4 liter gas powered naturally aspirated engine put together by engineers? Lets make it even and take away the supercharger and put em both on gas. Once again the rednecks lose.
@Countavery I was commenting on Bleed's statement about pitting an F1 car against an 8000 hp Top Fuel dragster - and that it would be no contest. I was not commenting on their levels of sophistication. That being said, the knowledge and required technology to extract 1000 hp per liter is actually quite sophisticated. Your snobby comments about F1 technology vs. are boring and unnecessary. And I'm guessing at least some of the F1 engine guys would be fascinated with Top Fuel engines.
Fascinated with 8000 hp from 500 cui engine which is forged from one piece of aluminium alloy and more stronger than, F1 engine specially cast?? And you are watching 25 years F1 and you don't know that BMW had 1.5 liter 1500bhp engine in 90's??? Honda 1350bhp from 1.5 also??? This power was used at training, but still impressive. 1000bhp / liter was broken record before 20 years. What is impressive about TopFuel is G-forces at accelerating (like Raptor F22), nothing else.
@2jzgtejza80 Since English is not your first language I'll forgive you your grammatical trespasses. That being said, we're talking apples and oranges here. No matter the specific output per liter, 8000 hp is 8000 hp and must be respected. The fellows designing and building these engines are not gap-toothed hillbillies rounding off boltheads with monkey wrenches, and the engines/chassis have made steady progress from 8 sec quarter miles at 200 mph to 4.5 sec at 330 mph. Watch sometime...
Drag racing is not accepted as a motor-sport discipline form FIA. I'm not fun of drag racing and there is nothing special about that. But I respect engineering and people (engineers) who were built those strong and durable engines. These engines have forged blocks so can endure huge amount of forces. Everything about engines are normal, but nitromethan (liquid explosive) is key of power, nothing else.
@2jzgtejza80 Your snobbiness come through loud and clear. Ho hum. And you obviously know nothing about nitromethane - it is not "liquid explosive". And the key to the power of these machines is not merely the nitromethane fuel but...oh, what's the use? You don't care. I'll tell you something, though: While Formula 1 racing is based on the most sophisticated machinery built to a specification, there is nothing sophisticated about being a spectator. It is dead, dull boring...
I drove several times drag race (with some moded 10's 11's cars) and I raced a lot more time on the racetrack with some average track cars. It's much interesting and fun drive around track long about 4.5 km for 2 hours, than 1/4mile for about 10's. At race track I learned to control cars, how to draw in oversteer and understeer situations, how to control gas pedal and brake in curves, how to upshift proper, and how to downshift with some racing techniques.
I repeat, I respect the engineers and their creations, but I'm not fun of drag racing. Yes, I'm watching drag racing, but not because it's interesting. Nitromethan is non-flammable liquid with over 50% of oxygen in it, but when you add methanol in combination you can get 90% of power more. Nitromethan need less air to burn than gasoline but gives more energy than race fuel (much faster burning). In TopFuel engines gives exactly 90% more because of mixing with 10% pure methanol.
@Countavery As well, the comparison of a 500 cubic inch aluminum block with two valves per cylinder running straight gas against an 800 hp 2.4 liter F1 motor with pneumatic valves, fuel injection, and a host of computer controls would be difficult. That being said, getting 800 reliable hp out of 500 cubes is not a problem at all. NASCAR people are getting almost that out of 358 cubic inch motors (770 hp with a 4-barrel Holley carb - courtesy Hendrick Motorsports) So fuck you, snob.
@Countavery Not on your life, junior. I love Formula 1 - been watching it for as long as it's been available on my TV (25 years). They are indeed the most sophisticated form of motorsport out there. Doesn't mean other motorsports aren't worth watching because their technology isn't as exotic. I don't watch NASCAR because it's too fucking boring watching a drafting competition. That being said, I love to restore 1950's outboard motors with dual contact points/coils. High tech isn't everything...
@HeyMarkedOne8 Uhhh ... they simulate races on the engine to test durabilty. This program the engine is running is probably from testing on some particular circuit (all the down shifting, the change in throttle, etc.).
Injectors, are placed this distance to allow a good air fuel mixture for an engine that sucks a huge quantity of air. The speed that air goes into a normal engine is about 9 times slower than an F1.
there are much better engines which are electrical engines.. they are most efficiant and more ecological.. russia showed something like this.. cranes always uses electrical engines but we can't use best technology becouse of seeknes of power to rule of those who keep them hidden.. have a good day
I'm far far away from engeneering but i don't like this setup with injectors.The fuel leaking through the velocity stacks and part of the mixture get away from the intake.Maybe I'm so wrong but that i see the tings
@c12letmefly those motors are running damn near 20k rpms. i guarantee that there isnt a drop of the mixture leaking out with that kind of air pressure. dont take offense. im not tryin to be a smartass, just fillin ya in.
I know this will never happen, and I'm probably going to get tons of thumbs down. But for one season. just ONE season i wish formula 1 would use rotary engines :P
Renault should build this in their Twingo ^^
ILoveCarsMoreThanYou 22 hours ago
pretty much tells us that the nascar boys are piloting low tech beerwagons over here on our side of the pond...
yzfr1liter 2 days ago
Not a big fan of gas power, but even I will say that is amazing , what a sweet sounds!!!
SOUTHBAYDIESEL 1 week ago
The sweet, addictive sound of high tech power and ultimate precision...I don't know why I keep watching this marvel over and over again! Addictive for the ones who realize the engineering achievement reached in the fabrication of these engines......
ellebal1111 2 weeks ago
What's the MPG?
;)
Darkc0w 1 month ago
Imagine this rigged up to a race seat. with a G27 wheel while playing a racing sim. Best set up ever!
I guess the engine is running off telemetry taken from a track and it is replicating exactly what throttle inputs and gear changes were made by the driver. I was trying to guess the circuit. It sounded like it was at Malaysia or China but I could be wrong.
Thanks for uploading.
TJD24tamebandkk 1 month ago
@30,000 RPM thats about 500 revolutions per second....stunning
vegas2ftw 2 months ago
and how did they manage to make the throttle response that fast even in the low revs
mir4ok 2 months ago
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh............................yyyyyyyeeeeeeaaaaaaahhhhhh, im gonna need a towel.
kanaka8787 2 months ago
Renault 12 GTI :O
Estupidoysensualflan 2 months ago
Very french, very awesome, screw Nascar...200MPH in a left hand cicrle, PAHH!
F1, 200MPH, right, left, up, down. the new 4D.
Mrengineerwannabe1 2 months ago
MUITO FRAU
fbo68 2 months ago in playlist CAMINHOES MONSTROS
This has been flagged as spam show
I love that engine sound!
Bylga 2 months ago
the next season of F1 (2011-2012) "Williams" return to a Renault Sport engine
So now 4 of the greaters F1 Ecuries have a Renault Sport Engine ^^
cumbas 3 months ago
Its ALIVEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FrapsYou 3 months ago
Do these run on gasoline? What makes them sound like this?
punchmaster123 4 months ago
@punchmaster123 They sound like this because of the high RPMs they run, up to 19 000 revolutions per minute
nirvana162416 4 months ago
beautiful engine sound.
mecastix2 4 months ago
God i wish rotary engines were allowed in F1, a mazda 4 rotor would be an amazing match (even better) then one of these engines. All these bans and rules they have come up with is honestly ruining racing. One day they will all have the same EXACT car, what fun is that going to be? If manufacturers had the ability to use different technology in races like these, think of all the awesome new ideas that would be born from it. Bring back the meaning of racing!!!!
BagpipekilR 4 months ago
very nice
wen290585401 4 months ago
this engine should be in every Renault car.
juvamzdelis 4 months ago
Hmmm...some the gas is escaping into the air D:
KDALove 5 months ago in playlist Liked
@KDALove Indirect injection
Karlitox23 5 months ago
@Karlitox23 I don't know much about internal combustion engines, but isn't it a performance loss since some of the fuel is escaping out?
KDALove 5 months ago
@KDALove Well, its suposed that the aspiration of the pistons "suck" all the fuel, but the modern engines use direct injection into the combustion chamber so it burns cleaner and more efficiently, but I don't know if the new F1 engines use it
Karlitox23 5 months ago
Renault won like 90% of the finishes for the 2011 F1 Season... where is the Renault Supercar? imo.. if renault made a production car like F1 based.. it would be better than Ferrari, Lambo, Koenigsegg, Porsche.. their marketing and development team sucks
AntDX316 5 months ago
@AntDX316
There was the "Alpine" sportscar brand which was French and relied a lot on Renault parts (used their engines). The Renault Alpine GTA (A610) was around in the mid 80's and had performance comparable to the Porsche 911 and Ferrari 328.
Renault could easily do a V10 engined supercar, but remember that Renault is owned by the French State, and in today's politically correct times, they are only interested in environmentally friendly and frugal city cars. Well, those sell a lot.
McLarenMercedes 4 months ago
@McLarenMercedes odd.. I think Ferrari, Lamborghini, BMW, Mercedes and eq... had the proper marketting or business ppl to make their cars be and go popular world wide.. I think Renault has/had the potential for that same "status" if they had that proper business ppl at the time.. in history..
AntDX316 4 months ago
@McLarenMercedes
???!!!
Dont know this noob of course..
Non educated guy, for your information Renault is not a "Régie" & is a "SA" = a private trust own for the majority part by private French Investors (Banks & Assurances) since 1990 & the French State is not the owner of Renault since 1994 precisly...
So Renautl is well a private trust now
BUT the politic of the French cars brands is not to build very expensive Super Sport cars for a rare little part of richmen in the world quite simply
cumbas 3 months ago
Comment removed
basstard013 5 months ago
This is one of the most beautyful things I have ever seen (heard)!
The 3.0 L V10 era was amazing.
arschgarten 5 months ago
mechanical injection thats whats up
Jzoutis 7 months ago
It seems to me that the only logical thing to do would be to stick my hand that
ClvnRozz 7 months ago
at 19,000 RPM, its chucking out more than a thousand horsepower :S!!!!!!!!!
Aly80442 7 months ago
@Aly80442 wrong, in the 80's and 90's when they ran 3.0L V10's they did get to about 1k bhp, but now they don't. Since FIA limited the engines to 2.4 V8's they get to about 760 bhp. FIA are going to restrict it even further in 2012 to Turbocharged 1.6L V6's.
TheDavidchill 7 months ago
@TheDavidchill WRONG! they are going to be I4 not v6. lol
mjazy981 6 months ago
@mjazy981 The FIA has announced the intention to the change the 2.4-litre V8 engines to 1.6 litre 6 cylinder turbo engines, containing fuel flow restrictions and including energy recovery systems in order to make Formula One more environmentally aware and to attract more commercial partners for 2014.
For the 2006 season and on, the engines had to be 90° V8 of 2.4 litres.
TheDavidchill 6 months ago
@mjazy981 your wrong, it is a 1.6 v6 turbo engine
31puddin19 6 months ago
Comment removed
Aly80442 7 months ago
how many MPG ????
sc882tt 7 months ago in playlist ENGINE!
Anyone know why it sounds the way it does?
ravenwda007 7 months ago
@ravenwda007 maybe 18.000 RPM have something to do with it :)
asflis 7 months ago
These engines should be in their production cars....
mikeb1444 8 months ago 33
@mikeb1444 lol id like to see that engine in a clio
olliegamer 5 months ago
@mikeb1444 100 to 150 thousand for a engine like this.
TheZoelzer2 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheZoelzer2
It's worth it.
mikeb1444 4 months ago
@mikeb1444 Have you heard of the one engine for every weekend agreement in formula one? If the have to rebuild it after 3 days of use then it will never work in a road car.
atvkindaguy1 3 months ago in playlist Formula 1 Engine Sounds
@mikeb1444 They are WAY too loud to be put in road cars, and they get terrible mileage. Also, as I can see people have already said, they don't last long. You can get about 600 miles maximum out of 1 engine.
Slashbag69 3 months ago
@Slashbag69
They can get rid of the pneumatic valve assembly, switch to a piston with a taller crown, and cut the rev limit to 10-12K. Using parts with more slack will make the engine just as reliable as any other car.
mikeb1444 3 months ago
@mikeb1444
Sure
Us the French Fans of our French Sport brands are dispointed year after year to dont see our French brands who do a perfect French Rules in the professional Sport cars competitions in the world (F1 --> Renault best engine, WRC --> WC Citroen Racing, "Le Mans Series" --> WC Peugeot Sport, a perfect French Rules yes ^^) made also French Super Sport cars in the same hight level sport
Sure the little part of very richmen are not the objectives of our brands but SHIT made that!!
cumbas 3 months ago
@mikeb1444 its headed that way. the move is def going high compression high rpm.. but it will never be on this level
LimitLess565 3 months ago
Fuck nascar and indy!
anitec19 8 months ago 4
sick!
simon3314 8 months ago
i think if I stand next to it and flick a lighter and the whole thing would blow up and shred me into pieces.
golferchin76 8 months ago in playlist Mx5
The stroke on these engines is extremely small- some have only a 1.5-inch stroke.
douro20 9 months ago
@partofdword they will produce (be limited to) around 800hp (1.6L inline 4 turbos), nothing funny about it. Durring the 1986 turbo era, the 1.5L Lotus-Renault engines put out 1,400hp in qualifying trim. Let engine size not fool you. In F1, with the money they have, anything is possible.
bob333336 10 months ago
In 2013 Formulas cars will have 1.6 litre turbocharged 4-cylinder engine LOL
BlooDish14 10 months ago
@BlooDish14 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WTH atleast is should be a V6 hahahahahaahahahah that is hilarious .
partofdworld 10 months ago
@BlooDish14 Seriously?
chicks123 9 months ago
@chicks123 Yes, use google. They consume 35 percent less fuel that means 85-90 less fuel in each race.
They are limited up to 12.000RPMs and around 750hp.
BlooDish14 9 months ago
@BlooDish14
LOL. And 5 bar pressure
Zukeless 9 months ago
@Zukeless really? :DD
BlooDish14 9 months ago
@BlooDish14
yep:)
Zukeless 9 months ago
Thats gotta be well over 10,000 RPMS.
Astromchaser 10 months ago
@Astromchaser 19,000 rpm
stlracer25 10 months ago
That is truly the most beautiful sound Ive ever heard.
scarabmasta 10 months ago
It was just announced that all Formula One teams
will be using 2 cylinder diesel engines in 2014.
Regulations have required the 2 cylinder diesel engines
which will rev to a limit of 3600 RPM and must have
normally-aspirated units.The FIA say we need to move on and
show that Formula One is moving on in a fuel-efficiency age.
A knock-on effect of that is that it’s going to get a little bit slower ,
top speed 76MPH and 0-60 in 43 seconds.
dazaro3 11 months ago
@dazaro3 i suppose aerodynamics wont be much of an issue then.
justtryharder 11 months ago
@dazaro3 obvious troll is obvious
i still lol'ed thou
etofun 11 months ago
38 people would rather watch nascar
motopsyco612 11 months ago 82
@motopsyco612 its called engineering which is why Nascar fans dont understand it
trackend 5 hours ago
two injectors per cylinder?
jamsstar2010 1 year ago
@jamsstar2010 you are correct. The injectors that are shown in the video are the secondary injectors and they only supply fuel past a certain RPM because the primaries can't supply the amount of fuel the engine requires at the higher RPM's. Any high revving engine will normally have secondary injectors including most Super Sport Motorcycles.
asljkghfwoiuyerwvzkx 1 year ago
@asljkghfwoiuyerwvzkx wow sounds like you know your stuff.a first for youtube,thank you.
jamsstar2010 11 months ago
@jamsstar2010 anytime, i try to help in anyway i can and i always try to learn new things and then pass them on.
asljkghfwoiuyerwvzkx 11 months ago
@jamsstar2010 eight holes, eight injectors. eight cyinlinders..
QenZi 11 months ago
hmm some say fuel some say water............can we have an expert please?lots of people think they know the answer,how they know unless their an F1 engine builder i dont know.maybe its injecting magic!!!!
jamsstar2010 1 year ago
Comment removed
ChevySilverado90 1 year ago
@jamsstar2010 Those are the fuel injectors you are seeing in the video. The formula states that they cannot inject ANYTHING but fuel into the engine.
ChevySilverado90 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We hit it off so well after another visit busizz4me.info
geratmathew 1 year ago
wow,16-18,000 rpm. imagine how fast everything is moving. hooly.
IxUNTOUCHBLExI 1 year ago
@IxUNTOUCHBLExI 16 - 18,000 rpm? even used my calculator. maybe
98gsoup 1 year ago
LOL Not very fuel efficient.
frambesbuckeye 1 year ago
I love standoffs. :D
kimgulle 1 year ago
you only want torque when you haul shit around.......this car weighs probably less than your fatass lol....that's WITH the driver lulz...
bobscanfly 1 year ago
@bobscanfly What a fucking stupid and ill-informed comment. If you want to accelerate, you need torque.
toaster1971 1 year ago
@toaster1971 trust me...my motorcycle has the lowest torque in all of the 600's but because of it's power to weigh ratio it will haul ass... so shut your mouth before you talk. are you a car tech like me?
bobscanfly 1 year ago
@bobscanfly Chances are your not a car tech. Can you tell me what kind of fuel injection system F1 engines use? Mas, Maf, ect.
ChevySilverado90 1 year ago
@ChevySilverado90 dude so you're going around talking down to people? shame on you...and for your info those are individual port injections shooting fuel directly into those individual butterfly valves...which they should've done direct injection for but who knows why they didn't...i know some bmw cars have individual valves and they also uses VANOS for their variable valve system which uses solenoids instead of a camshaft.....SO STFU GTFO....no internet points for you! thumbs down for u
bobscanfly 1 year ago
@bobscanfly *Individual port injectors* Which has nothing to do with the question asked. They use an ALPHA-N system that estimates engine loading based on throttle position and engine speed. The reason why they dont do DI is cause the engine speeds at the moment are too fast for a DI system to correctly function. In 2013 they might but speeds will be limited to 12,000 rpm. BMW cars with VVT has nothing to do with F1, mainly cause the formula states that they can't use VVT or Variable intakes.
ChevySilverado90 1 year ago
@ChevySilverado90 potato - po-ta-to...same shit...i don't really care for how F1 works...cuz i don't work on F1's...but since you're high and mighty you must be working for F1
bobscanfly 1 year ago
@toaster1971 Regardless of what some old timer told you, high tq is not necessary for high acceleration. Gearing and RPM can make that comment totally old, lame and obsolete... if tq was so necessary the motor in this video would be a dog and it certainly isnt.
TurboGSR96 8 months ago
Fuel inject just outside of the short velocity stacks in front of a crap load of individual throttle bodies. Nice.
EaziD 1 year ago
how is it getting compression? guess i dont know as much about engines as i thought
ttolmbrftttwtbopat 1 year ago
Oh, my ears have gone to heaven!
TailLightProductions 1 year ago
If they are made this light (cars and engine) why don't they screw more torque out of them and it will accelereate like nothing else.
moossee32 1 year ago
I do not understand what is goign on in this video. Is that Gas being sprayed there?
And if so is it already mixed with air?
donperry1 1 year ago
@donperry1 It is. To get the best out of the car they put the fuel injectors outside of the engine intake so the fuel can atomise properly and not form into droplets like most cars these days. It also gives more volumetric efficiency to the best part of about 95-100%
moossee32 1 year ago
Hull257 what a fail kid if u knew anything about f1 u would know that they hit 0-100 in around 5 seconds
NeVeC7 1 year ago
@countavery, I suggest you fo a little investigation before replying to this, I just checked and the CBR250 had a redline of 19k with conventional valve springs, maybe your getting confused with the Honda CB250?? I think that had a redline of 8k
MrTrickymex 1 year ago
Comment removed
Countavery 1 year ago
@MrTrickymex Forgot about that insane old bike. But just like Yamaha's claimed 17,500 for there r6, i really doubt the 19k redline.
Countavery 1 year ago
Best porno ever!! :D
davidwiberg84 1 year ago
Need to marry you **busizz4me.info**
mayakanthineela 1 year ago
think with your dipstick jimmy!
snowdude67 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rbmdl They did itwww.youtube.com/watch?v=hdTEy3sVqhw
stifler44300 1 year ago
What kind of injection is this? Throttle body / simultaneous multi-point?
michaelthepsycho 1 year ago
@michaelthepsycho it's more like throttle body, is just 1 throttle body per cylinder
turtlemann14 1 year ago
I think Renault's are the best sounding engines in F1
Trevor715 1 year ago
i love this "song"
TheDiogoFCPORTO 1 year ago 93
@TheDiogoFCPORTO
I totally love this "song" too!
SandboxGeneral 1 year ago
@TheDiogoFCPORTO
I totally love this "song" too!
SandboxGeneral 1 year ago
@ mike6984, what are you talking about?? First of all these are pneumatic valves not hydraulic and conventional valve sprung valve train has bee used in road going motorbikes well 15k RPM for years, in fact I think the old Honda CBR250 had a redline of 20k
MrTrickymex 1 year ago
@MrTrickymex why not desmodromic..?!
it's best valve control system ever..
WStreetfame 1 year ago
@MrTrickymex 15k is a little different than 20k. Honda CBR250 had a 9000rpm redline. Perhaps you are thinking of the Honda RS250, but thats a 2 stroke.
Countavery 1 year ago
what the hell is that? (one the top of the engine) injector?
syedjaafar 1 year ago
didnt seem to burn anything out engine worked fine and was on a stand
trialsteam 1 year ago
quite moved...
what many valve does this engine have?
monpaps1 1 year ago
quite moved...
monpaps1 1 year ago
Burning out the tires... The rapid and spastic engine acceleration.
NoahLDiamond 1 year ago
los aparatos amarillos soninyectores?
y si es asi por q estan al aire libre ? no se supone que se debenmezclar enla camara de combustion? <.<
xxTraBiSxx 1 year ago
the soud of that engine is so beautiful. renault makes some amazing formula one engines.
scarabmasta 1 year ago
thats the fuel being injected??? WTF???? thats insane.
rustlerboi1052 1 year ago
@mike3684 well the valves are pressurized by oil, not springs. If u had regular valves taken off of a street car the f1 couldn't go past idle speed. What blows me away is the injectors.
stlchevy95 1 year ago
@stlchevy95 really, i knew about hydrolic valving but i was under the impression that it was still an experimental thing... and yeah no doubt most stock springs are good to about 7500 max, not 10-20k... cool to know tho, thanks!
mike3684 1 year ago
@stlchevy95 This engine uses pneumatic valve, not hydraulic. The injectors are relatively old school but pneumatic valves are very high-tech.
beeroosterm 1 year ago
i think its amazing how ther can get accurate timing and spark at that RPM, and still not float any valves... its my opinion that all engines should have desmodromic valving... best invantion since the TV...
mike3684 1 year ago
@mike3684 well said springs have had there day
marshgatelaneposse 1 year ago
i want that engine in my lawnmower !!!
panzarw 1 year ago
best engine sound out there
peterock1313 1 year ago
I need it...... in my mower ! or in my mixer !
breitling911 1 year ago
What a waste that these machines arent mass-produced.
TheArfdog 1 year ago
gotta love the screaming....
ferrarinic 1 year ago
Squirty Mc squirt-squirt
mattblack77nz 1 year ago
That is the engine of the GODS!!!! Nothing beats the F1 racing engines! I would love to see an F1 go up against a Top-Fuel dragster! That would be a fun thing to watch!!
PlayTilTheyBleed 1 year ago
@PlayTilTheyBleed Are you kidding? Top Fuel dragsters now have 8000 hp (eight thousand) - ten times the Renault's. They go from a standing start to 330 mph in 4.5 seconds in the most amazing manner. Engine sound of the Gods? Ever been to Top Fuel event? I remember the first time I did; the only word that describes the sound is "violent". It compressed my chest each time a cylinder fired (1000 hp each). 500-inch V-8's. Nitromethane fuel. No contest...
beeroosterm 1 year ago
@beeroosterm Are you kidding? How are you comparing an 8+ liter engine drinking nitromethane and forcefed by a supercharger put together by mechanics to a 2.4 liter gas powered naturally aspirated engine put together by engineers? Lets make it even and take away the supercharger and put em both on gas. Once again the rednecks lose.
Countavery 1 year ago
@Countavery I was commenting on Bleed's statement about pitting an F1 car against an 8000 hp Top Fuel dragster - and that it would be no contest. I was not commenting on their levels of sophistication. That being said, the knowledge and required technology to extract 1000 hp per liter is actually quite sophisticated. Your snobby comments about F1 technology vs. are boring and unnecessary. And I'm guessing at least some of the F1 engine guys would be fascinated with Top Fuel engines.
beeroosterm 1 year ago
@beeroosterm
Fascinated with 8000 hp from 500 cui engine which is forged from one piece of aluminium alloy and more stronger than, F1 engine specially cast?? And you are watching 25 years F1 and you don't know that BMW had 1.5 liter 1500bhp engine in 90's??? Honda 1350bhp from 1.5 also??? This power was used at training, but still impressive. 1000bhp / liter was broken record before 20 years. What is impressive about TopFuel is G-forces at accelerating (like Raptor F22), nothing else.
2jzgtejza80 1 year ago
@2jzgtejza80 Since English is not your first language I'll forgive you your grammatical trespasses. That being said, we're talking apples and oranges here. No matter the specific output per liter, 8000 hp is 8000 hp and must be respected. The fellows designing and building these engines are not gap-toothed hillbillies rounding off boltheads with monkey wrenches, and the engines/chassis have made steady progress from 8 sec quarter miles at 200 mph to 4.5 sec at 330 mph. Watch sometime...
beeroosterm 1 year ago
@beeroosterm
Drag racing is not accepted as a motor-sport discipline form FIA. I'm not fun of drag racing and there is nothing special about that. But I respect engineering and people (engineers) who were built those strong and durable engines. These engines have forged blocks so can endure huge amount of forces. Everything about engines are normal, but nitromethan (liquid explosive) is key of power, nothing else.
2jzgtejza80 1 year ago
@2jzgtejza80 Your snobbiness come through loud and clear. Ho hum. And you obviously know nothing about nitromethane - it is not "liquid explosive". And the key to the power of these machines is not merely the nitromethane fuel but...oh, what's the use? You don't care. I'll tell you something, though: While Formula 1 racing is based on the most sophisticated machinery built to a specification, there is nothing sophisticated about being a spectator. It is dead, dull boring...
beeroosterm 1 year ago
@beeroosterm Comes...
beeroosterm 1 year ago
@beeroosterm
I drove several times drag race (with some moded 10's 11's cars) and I raced a lot more time on the racetrack with some average track cars. It's much interesting and fun drive around track long about 4.5 km for 2 hours, than 1/4mile for about 10's. At race track I learned to control cars, how to draw in oversteer and understeer situations, how to control gas pedal and brake in curves, how to upshift proper, and how to downshift with some racing techniques.
2jzgtejza80 1 year ago
@beeroosterm
I repeat, I respect the engineers and their creations, but I'm not fun of drag racing. Yes, I'm watching drag racing, but not because it's interesting. Nitromethan is non-flammable liquid with over 50% of oxygen in it, but when you add methanol in combination you can get 90% of power more. Nitromethan need less air to burn than gasoline but gives more energy than race fuel (much faster burning). In TopFuel engines gives exactly 90% more because of mixing with 10% pure methanol.
2jzgtejza80 1 year ago
@Countavery As well, the comparison of a 500 cubic inch aluminum block with two valves per cylinder running straight gas against an 800 hp 2.4 liter F1 motor with pneumatic valves, fuel injection, and a host of computer controls would be difficult. That being said, getting 800 reliable hp out of 500 cubes is not a problem at all. NASCAR people are getting almost that out of 358 cubic inch motors (770 hp with a 4-barrel Holley carb - courtesy Hendrick Motorsports) So fuck you, snob.
beeroosterm 1 year ago
@beeroosterm Lets just leave it at you like technology that my lawnmower is powered by and i like the best.
Countavery 1 year ago
@Countavery Not on your life, junior. I love Formula 1 - been watching it for as long as it's been available on my TV (25 years). They are indeed the most sophisticated form of motorsport out there. Doesn't mean other motorsports aren't worth watching because their technology isn't as exotic. I don't watch NASCAR because it's too fucking boring watching a drafting competition. That being said, I love to restore 1950's outboard motors with dual contact points/coils. High tech isn't everything...
beeroosterm 1 year ago
music
jayguy173 1 year ago
hahha the sound record was from F1 race not from the testing!XD
HeyMarkedOne8 1 year ago
@HeyMarkedOne8 Uhhh ... they simulate races on the engine to test durabilty. This program the engine is running is probably from testing on some particular circuit (all the down shifting, the change in throttle, etc.).
lookoutforchris 1 year ago
God damn i love that sound
Infern4l 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out the new video I uploaded. It's Jenson Button and Lewis Hamilton in the McLaren garage.
youtube.com/watch?v=EqWrLWaWG_8
arte100 1 year ago
Injectors, are placed this distance to allow a good air fuel mixture for an engine that sucks a huge quantity of air. The speed that air goes into a normal engine is about 9 times slower than an F1.
jhhoffman 1 year ago
That's scary.
beenohopps 1 year ago
there are much better engines which are electrical engines.. they are most efficiant and more ecological.. russia showed something like this.. cranes always uses electrical engines but we can't use best technology becouse of seeknes of power to rule of those who keep them hidden.. have a good day
FeeldaWorld 1 year ago
wooo
MrBen185 1 year ago
could someone tell my why the fuel injectors are on the outside and what trait does that give the car?
Inklebonker1 1 year ago
orgasmic
elfrankyconel47 1 year ago
I'm far far away from engeneering but i don't like this setup with injectors.The fuel leaking through the velocity stacks and part of the mixture get away from the intake.Maybe I'm so wrong but that i see the tings
c12letmefly 1 year ago
@c12letmefly those motors are running damn near 20k rpms. i guarantee that there isnt a drop of the mixture leaking out with that kind of air pressure. dont take offense. im not tryin to be a smartass, just fillin ya in.
italiankid1119 1 year ago
Why are the injectors outside ?!?
n2opkain 1 year ago
@n2opkain There not, they just have the cover off of it
tpaadministrator 1 year ago
@tpaadministrator Ahh ok, i thought the injectors are placed closer to the intake valves, why are the placed at the Throttlebody ?
n2opkain 1 year ago
Fantástico!!!
cassioluizzancope 1 year ago
This is what I would call mechanical sex.
mgospeed31 1 year ago 2
I know this will never happen, and I'm probably going to get tons of thumbs down. But for one season. just ONE season i wish formula 1 would use rotary engines :P
and that video was freakin awesome!
trombonekingdom 1 year ago
there doing a dyno test, simulaiting as if the car was running on a track. they use data they record.
discopigs69 1 year ago
Like music to my ears.
MattUK2007 1 year ago 2
Amazing stuff. Sounds like it's angry hehe.
syncm 2 years ago
it is angry, very angry...
papertigers426 1 year ago