Eliamagic,thanks for the vid.I believe like others here they correctly diagnosed the Photo REMNANTS/Compression artifacts/digitizing effects/glitches due to enlargement etc. I want to show you the people,animals,structures,fossils I found from mostly rovers 2004-10 photobucket com/albums/a221/jlehane3/ I designed the rovers /sats 1987 in hand-drawn diagrams sent to JPL/Nasa via Gene Roddenberry jpl123 AT inbox com
THIS IS CALLED "DIGITAL COMPRESSION ARTIFACT" It is the result of how the digital process compiles data into a visual impression. The effect can be found at all hi-res photo shots that are altered through enhancement processes.
THIS IS NOT LIFE ON MARS,,,,SO DON'T MAKE A SPEAKING CAREER OUT OF IT!
Aww, c'mon ... this is about as dumb as it gets? Zoom in enough and use too much JPG- compression and you can have these "buildings" on a picture of your own freaking belly button!!!
It's just proof for that you find what you look for, and when you find it you stop looking, unless you know better ... so never look for something. You need to look for ANYTHING to find something. How's that for a trippy thought?
It is just a reflection off another source...you can see right through them to the ground below....and also they do not follow the contour of the ground..I checked it out over and over and always came to the same conclusion
you dont need pictures i got videos. I have been waching closeley Mars for ower 1 year... Thanks to google mars 5.0 version I found wery wery intresting tings on Mars... Mamny many Cities wery clear videos...Go to my nick TikvicKanada and wach under Mars video and City on Mars.. many moore to com par my English I am Croatian .
It is just a reflection off another source...you can see right through them to the ground below....and also they do not follow the contour of the ground..I checked it out over and over and always came to the same conclusion...I opened the photo in a program called "gimp 2" went to the "colors" tab and selected "Levels" and simply adjusted the sliders until I got the best possible outcome..
I hope and pray no one is this dumb to believe in all of this Mars BS ?As this stuff is for the uneducated people who need some excitement in their lifes other then smoking weed !
Photo, from the Greek φωξ means any print made by light. But then again, you will "technicalities, picky-picky responses, all as a effort to discredit whatever you do to clarify photos, whih in the first place should have been published with a good enhancement.
Here's a rational explanation: Use the same imaging enhancement techniques on a Google map photo of almost any flat area of water on earth and you get the same results.
Sorry to burst your bubble mate, but I think your imagination has been duped by digital compression.
Don't fret - the human brain is very adept to finding structured shapes out of randomness and we're quick to jump to the conclusion that intelligent forces are at work.
This definitely looks like JPEG-compression to me.. it's usualy most visible in the yellow regions when an image is coverted to CMYK in photoshop... you can see it on any picture..
thanks for the effort though.. the truth is also definitely coming out my friends ;-)
Am I the only one who finds it quite remarkable that with the Hubble and other satellites out there taking crystal clear images of Venus I just saw on line ... why are the Mars and The Moons photos so fuzzy ? The Hubble can see into light years away yet it cant find Mars ? I would think you should get Google Earth clarity eh ... They are with ought doubt keeping things from us. Nasa blurs out areas pixel at a time to keep us in the dark
I believe ancient artificial structures exist on Mars, but these pics are the result of digital compression artifacts. Don't think so? Apply the same techniques to a patch of desert or water from here on Earth and you'll get similar results.
have you ever seen photos like that of earth, i have of LA at night, it looked like this one, and other ones ive seen, we know its out there but no one cares!
Those are compression artifacts. If you make yourself familiar with how the HRSC works, you will find that the camera uses plain old JPEG-compression before transfering the photometric data back to earth. Nothing special about it, just external interference due to the underlying technology.
I agree with your comments about compression artifacts being a real issue..but that would not account for the same shapes (buildings) being seen from different shots. many mars pictures show structures which co-ordinate with other pictures of the same area.. This would not happen with compresion artifacts.
I already discussed this in the comments to some other videos about this phenomenon: the images are not photos, but instead 3D renderings using the same images as texture to create perspective images from different camera angles. if the artifacts are in the texture image, they will show up on every single of the perspective renderings with same location and alignment.
In isolation, what you say is credible.. but in the context of all the pictures from mars, many with 'objects' that have both geometry and also artistic design characteristics that are too prolific to simply be Rorschach images.
Hi Eliamagic, excellent stuff here! All this is very interesting, to say the least, and I think this stuff is awesome! Question: (out of my own curiosity) do you think that these images (or, objects) we're seeing, could be from image pixelation from image file compression or digital processing issues? Just curious.
Thanks laney50w! Glad you like the video and more importantly the contents. To answer your question I don't think that those shapes are either due to the compression or digital processing. Look at the Hale Crater pic. How could those shape be in perspective with the rest of the image? if it was just the compression process we would have seen them flat on top of the image but yet again they follow the terrain. I'm not trying to convince anybody here - just my 2cent :) THANKS!!
The images are not photos but instead 3D renderings with a 2D texture of the surface (bearing the artifacts) projected onto a 3D model of the landscape which has been aqruired using the stereo imagery taken by the HRSC. This explains why the artifacts are "aligned" and even occur at exactly the same locations on other prspective views (rendered with different camera angles).
Recently I've heard of an interesting theory which says that those shapes are underground buildings made visible in the picture by the heat that they produce which is then picked up in the infrared pictures.
I thought that for a minute but its obvious some of the structure are actually standing and have been blurred out part of our confusion could be resulting from both. Holla Back
At first I thought the same but then when I watched the first video of the Hale Crater I had the chance to see that those shapes are present on different pictures from different angles and that they were all there but in perspective, depending on the angle the pic was taken. I really don't have any explanation about why they're all there, on different pics with different angles and in perspective.I don't understand why they're present only on certain pictures and not all of them.
@BobMcCob Artifacts don't make shadows or follow terrain. But thanks for your Government Sponsored opinion. Also there is evidence of negative image flipping in this photo. Why would the ESA do this unless it was to cover up something? The truth will come out, maybe sooner than later.
Look at the 4:00 o'clock position from the red circle.Looks like a perfect outline of an American plane.At the 2:45 mark,interesting!!!
totobitthewizard 1 year ago
Eliamagic,thanks for the vid.I believe like others here they correctly diagnosed the Photo REMNANTS/Compression artifacts/digitizing effects/glitches due to enlargement etc. I want to show you the people,animals,structures,fossils I found from mostly rovers 2004-10 photobucket com/albums/a221/jlehane3/ I designed the rovers /sats 1987 in hand-drawn diagrams sent to JPL/Nasa via Gene Roddenberry jpl123 AT inbox com
jlehane3 1 year ago
THIS IS CALLED "DIGITAL COMPRESSION ARTIFACT" It is the result of how the digital process compiles data into a visual impression. The effect can be found at all hi-res photo shots that are altered through enhancement processes.
THIS IS NOT LIFE ON MARS,,,,SO DON'T MAKE A SPEAKING CAREER OUT OF IT!
Trolleymoose 1 year ago
@Trolleymoose Go back to commenting on car wrecks. Digital Compression Artifacts Do not make shadows.
macten11 5 months ago
I believe that is called pixelation, not an extraterrestrial civilization.
crunchwagon 1 year ago
Nice work!
I see you used simmilar color tweak techniques as I do. Please check my videos. There is a lot more to see on the ESA images. check it out!
getreal155 1 year ago
Aww, c'mon ... this is about as dumb as it gets? Zoom in enough and use too much JPG- compression and you can have these "buildings" on a picture of your own freaking belly button!!!
It's just proof for that you find what you look for, and when you find it you stop looking, unless you know better ... so never look for something. You need to look for ANYTHING to find something. How's that for a trippy thought?
aNdYmAtTeR 1 year ago
It is just a reflection off another source...you can see right through them to the ground below....and also they do not follow the contour of the ground..I checked it out over and over and always came to the same conclusion
deleriumt 1 year ago
you dont need pictures i got videos. I have been waching closeley Mars for ower 1 year... Thanks to google mars 5.0 version I found wery wery intresting tings on Mars... Mamny many Cities wery clear videos...Go to my nick TikvicKanada and wach under Mars video and City on Mars.. many moore to com par my English I am Croatian .
TikvicKanada 1 year ago
Excelent.. Check my videos for some more shocking news
getreal155 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is just a reflection off another source...you can see right through them to the ground below....and also they do not follow the contour of the ground..I checked it out over and over and always came to the same conclusion...I opened the photo in a program called "gimp 2" went to the "colors" tab and selected "Levels" and simply adjusted the sliders until I got the best possible outcome..
deleriumt 2 years ago
I hope and pray no one is this dumb to believe in all of this Mars BS ?As this stuff is for the uneducated people who need some excitement in their lifes other then smoking weed !
demmylowther 2 years ago
Comment removed
getreal155 1 year ago
Photo, from the Greek φωξ means any print made by light. But then again, you will "technicalities, picky-picky responses, all as a effort to discredit whatever you do to clarify photos, whih in the first place should have been published with a good enhancement.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
Here's a rational explanation: Use the same imaging enhancement techniques on a Google map photo of almost any flat area of water on earth and you get the same results.
Sorry to burst your bubble mate, but I think your imagination has been duped by digital compression.
Don't fret - the human brain is very adept to finding structured shapes out of randomness and we're quick to jump to the conclusion that intelligent forces are at work.
Wouldn't it be terrible if we were alone ?
ejvideos07 2 years ago
Isn't it amazing how the Martians kept their city blocks exactly parallel?
Even over such random terrain.
Odd that they rejected any rounded constructions.
Even roads have curves.
Not in martian populated areas though.
clargdorp 2 years ago
This definitely looks like JPEG-compression to me.. it's usualy most visible in the yellow regions when an image is coverted to CMYK in photoshop... you can see it on any picture..
thanks for the effort though.. the truth is also definitely coming out my friends ;-)
MellyBelly52 2 years ago
Am I the only one who finds it quite remarkable that with the Hubble and other satellites out there taking crystal clear images of Venus I just saw on line ... why are the Mars and The Moons photos so fuzzy ? The Hubble can see into light years away yet it cant find Mars ? I would think you should get Google Earth clarity eh ... They are with ought doubt keeping things from us. Nasa blurs out areas pixel at a time to keep us in the dark
MasterMark123 2 years ago
I believe ancient artificial structures exist on Mars, but these pics are the result of digital compression artifacts. Don't think so? Apply the same techniques to a patch of desert or water from here on Earth and you'll get similar results.
TimelessOMO 2 years ago
have you ever seen photos like that of earth, i have of LA at night, it looked like this one, and other ones ive seen, we know its out there but no one cares!
pater429 3 years ago
Those are compression artifacts. If you make yourself familiar with how the HRSC works, you will find that the camera uses plain old JPEG-compression before transfering the photometric data back to earth. Nothing special about it, just external interference due to the underlying technology.
gwani 3 years ago
I agree with your comments about compression artifacts being a real issue..but that would not account for the same shapes (buildings) being seen from different shots. many mars pictures show structures which co-ordinate with other pictures of the same area.. This would not happen with compresion artifacts.
dumalucky 2 years ago
I already discussed this in the comments to some other videos about this phenomenon: the images are not photos, but instead 3D renderings using the same images as texture to create perspective images from different camera angles. if the artifacts are in the texture image, they will show up on every single of the perspective renderings with same location and alignment.
gwani 2 years ago
In isolation, what you say is credible.. but in the context of all the pictures from mars, many with 'objects' that have both geometry and also artistic design characteristics that are too prolific to simply be Rorschach images.
dumalucky 2 years ago
Hi Eliamagic, excellent stuff here! All this is very interesting, to say the least, and I think this stuff is awesome! Question: (out of my own curiosity) do you think that these images (or, objects) we're seeing, could be from image pixelation from image file compression or digital processing issues? Just curious.
laney50w 3 years ago
Thanks laney50w! Glad you like the video and more importantly the contents. To answer your question I don't think that those shapes are either due to the compression or digital processing. Look at the Hale Crater pic. How could those shape be in perspective with the rest of the image? if it was just the compression process we would have seen them flat on top of the image but yet again they follow the terrain. I'm not trying to convince anybody here - just my 2cent :) THANKS!!
Eliamagic 3 years ago
The images are not photos but instead 3D renderings with a 2D texture of the surface (bearing the artifacts) projected onto a 3D model of the landscape which has been aqruired using the stereo imagery taken by the HRSC. This explains why the artifacts are "aligned" and even occur at exactly the same locations on other prspective views (rendered with different camera angles).
gwani 3 years ago
nice job
cyraxandflyrax 3 years ago
Thanks Cyraxandflyrax!
Recently I've heard of an interesting theory which says that those shapes are underground buildings made visible in the picture by the heat that they produce which is then picked up in the infrared pictures.
Eliamagic 3 years ago
I thought that for a minute but its obvious some of the structure are actually standing and have been blurred out part of our confusion could be resulting from both. Holla Back
BruceStroub 3 years ago
haha, now i will have friends from Mars
mubpfc 3 years ago
No music...
one love
feardia 3 years ago
very cool Thanks
lovuian 3 years ago
Thank You lovuian!
I'm simply glad I found another pictures showing those "shapes" and proving that the Hale Crater pic wasn't an isolated case...
Eliamagic 3 years ago
Those are artifacts created by the fact that its a composite image.
BobMcCob 3 years ago
Hi BobMcCob,
At first I thought the same but then when I watched the first video of the Hale Crater I had the chance to see that those shapes are present on different pictures from different angles and that they were all there but in perspective, depending on the angle the pic was taken. I really don't have any explanation about why they're all there, on different pics with different angles and in perspective.I don't understand why they're present only on certain pictures and not all of them.
Eliamagic 3 years ago
@BobMcCob Artifacts don't make shadows or follow terrain. But thanks for your Government Sponsored opinion. Also there is evidence of negative image flipping in this photo. Why would the ESA do this unless it was to cover up something? The truth will come out, maybe sooner than later.
macten11 5 months ago
@macten11 In fact they do. And non of these artifacts follow shadows or terrain. You could do the same to the face of dog and get the same results.
BobMcCob 5 months ago
HD QUALITY AVAILABLE!
Eliamagic 3 years ago
I couldn't post the links to the pictures.
Please let me know if you have any suggestions about how to do it.
Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience but please follow the links provided in the video.
Eliamagic 3 years ago
Hi Elia i go with BobMcCob here...
btw you can post links in the video description
ufomovies 3 years ago