Added: 8 months ago
From: DiscoveryInstitute
Views: 1,394
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (290)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Evil in old testament is many things but not pure evil . In Isaiah 45:7, evil is translated to calamity.

  • What do you think of my theory? Spirits are inclination, therefore the love is the inclination to keep on experiencing interactions forever. And the Father is the inclination to incline. Inclinations initiate interactions therefore are alive. The nature of inclination itself is that there are always contra inclination, so evil is the contra inclination of keeping on experiencing interactions after interactions forever, which is the inclination to stop interactions from happening forever.

  • What about God's evil. Such as burning in hell really good and nice people, just becuase they didn't believe in him. Torturing people, not for what they did or who they are, but for what they believe. It's pure evil. Saddam Hussien also tortured people that didn't believe in his leadership. Even good people It's also sick and evil.

  • @Futureplanet Oh no burning people's souls is ok since he's god.

  • @4FunPlayin Yes. That's what followers of Hitler said. It's OK, because he's our glorious leader.

    evil is evil, I don't care whose invisible imaginary friend is doing it.

    Burning "souls" based on NOT what people are, or what they did, BUT based on WHAT THEY BELIEVE is pure evil. It IS the ideology of demended dictators.

    This is the ulimate proof that the bible is written by ancient religious zealouts.

    I wouldn't insult a god or "universe creator" to suggest they would stoop down so low.

  • @Futureplanet Sarcasm FFS.

  • @4FunPlayin ahhh.... now I read it again.... I see it.  hehehehe....thanks for the wind up :)

  • 3) Bad Choices.

    “Don't be misled--you cannot mock the justice of God. You will always harvest what you plant.” - Galatians 6:7 - New Living Translation

    Every choice we make has consequences. If we decide to invade Iraq, we expect body bags - dead soldiers to come home. Why blame God for such?

  • 2) “I have observed something else under the sun. The fastest runner doesn't always win the race, and the strongest warrior doesn't always win the battle. The wise sometimes go hungry, and the skillful are not necessarily wealthy. And those who are educated don't always lead successful lives. It is all decided by chance, by being in the right place at the right time.” - Ecclesiastes 9:11 New Living Translation

  • There are 3 main factors why there is evil or harmful conduct or events in the world:

    1) “We are certain that we are of God, but all the world is in the power of the Evil One.” 1st John 5:19 - Bible in Basic English

    Mankind is temporarily under Satan’s supervision; to prove he’s abilities as ruler, whilst Christ prepares his Millennial Reign now at hand.

  • “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.” - Isaiah 45:7 King James Version.

    God, according to the King James Bible, which was available to Darwin, does create evil. But what sort of Evil? Since God is morally good in the absolute, we cannot be talking about moral evil. The Oxford dictionary also defines Evil as: "harmful or tending to harm." - harm upon wrong doers and practices of moral evil. Hence a day of judging who is evil.

  • @myjizzureye

    I never thought that God created Evil, it's my understanding that he can't do evil and therefore couldn't create it. interesting topic.

    My Bible NIV, Says, "I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster."

  • Have you ever even read the bible?

    Isaiah 45:7

    King James Version (KJV)

    7) I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.

    Read your bible please, god is VERY VERY CLEAR on this topic, he CREATES ALL including evil.....

  • I do want to add, there are many who claim to believe in God who are downright crazy & those that want to bring the attention to themselves rather than to God himself. They repel rather than attract thinking, honest-hearted people to want to learn more. I can understand how they can cause vitriolic attitudes towards a belief in God. Because someone says they believe in God, doesn't mean God believes in them. Mankind is destroying itself, we're in a downward spiral. Who/what has the answer?

  • Thank you for this vid, you got the evolutionist going! An issue not clearly understood, even by those that believe in God, is the issue of Sovereignty. God's Sovereignty (his right to decide what was good) was challenged so he said in essence: Go ahead then, show me what you can do, create a better world. Evolution doesn't create a better world if only those humans who are strong & cunning get their way. The world of mankind is a mess & "science" promises they have the answers - we'll see.

  • @BibleTruthMatters - "Evolution doesn't create a better world if only those humans who are strong & cunning get their way."

    Evolutionary theory only explains how the world of organisms work, it is the way things are. Just because you "want" to believe that some invisible being controls the world does not make it so. All the "facts" point to a natural cause for the variety of life on Earth. There is no empirical evidence for the existence of the sort of metaphysical being that you are proposing.

  • @BibleTruthMatters I hope you aren't making the argument that: Evolution is cruel, therefore it is not true. The holocaust was cruel, it still happened. Just because it is a fact of live that the fit survive and the unfit survive in nature, doesn't mean that humans can't create a more stable society where everyone can receive a degree of social justice. Science is what gave us a society of abundance in the first place. If it wasn't for the Haber Process, we would still have to fight over food.

  • This guy is a closeted atheist. He's at the point where he realizes just how ridiculous christianity is and has just pulled a new religion out of his ass.

  • Maybe I grew up on a different planet, but how does this guy question evolution and accept God and keep a straight face? You can't just make up your own set of facts.

  • Just think about how much more progress we would have as a species if so many potentially useful minds weren't shackled to the delusion of religious belief. Instead of grasping at straws trying to justify the perverse Christian theology, they could be doing something useful.

  • And why would "the discovery institute" be talking about god and "evil" whilst demanding that a biological science answers a question that is nothing to do with it..... Oh yes.. Because they don't discover anything. Yada Yada Yada.... No science... just presume a god and then attack everything else around them.

  • Evolution IS established! It has been proven! If there's something that God can't do, then he's not omnipotent, is he? QED

  • But it is a fact even creationists cannot deny that millions of animals do die every day. At least theistic evolutionists have provided an explanation of why God lets this happen.  This guy seems to be saying it happens for no reason.

  • Look boys, it is good to keep an open mind (hence, how I know about Cremo, Hancock, et al), but not so open that your brain falls out. You will gain wisdom as you age & gain more knowledge & experience.

    Believe it or not, I was once a lot like you, but have grown up & followed the evidence of outrageous claims. Skepticism is good, if used properly.

    Evolution is a fact. The scientific evidence IS overwhelming. Don't take my word for it; check the scientific literature (eg. PubMed).

  • 2 brainwashed ape-man believing FOOLS which are excellent examples of government propaganda, misinformation, and utter STUPIDITY.

    Very sad.

  • @buffboynick the indoctranation must be ingrained on a generational level

  • If Darwinists could find the CHLCA or document one radical "species-transforming" mutation then everyone (including me) would believe in that far fetched FANTASY

  • These evolutionists dont even understand the principles of their own theory.

    When it comes to "radical change" Darwinian theory is left scratching its head.

    That's why the "time factor" got added in there.

    We are all suppose to believe that MILLIONS of years of small neutral mutations add up to all the bio-diversity here, haha!!!

    Talk about JUNK science. No wonder Dr Francis Crick came up with Directed Panspermia Theory. Because abiogenesis is CRAP!!! Total fantasy

  • @buffboynick - "Explain to us all the process of "devolution" that would have had to occur if chimps and us humans shared an ancestor with a bipedal ape-man?"

    Oh Buffy, you are truly deluded by the creatard literature. If you had any idea how evolutionary theory works, you would realize how stupid your above statement really is. What "devolution" are you referring to (you do know that evolution is directionless).

    "Homo Sapiens go on to trump all species on Earth"

    How do you figure that?

  • @CamW30

    Your MISunderstanding of the theorized process of evolution and shared ancestry is LAUGHABLE.

    Like the typical Darwinists you dont even research your own theory.

    I research BOTH sides, took a long hard look at Darwinism and decided its the most hilarious LOAD of BULLOCKS to ever be mislabeled as "science"

    Unlike REAL theories like Multiverse theory, Intervention Theory, and Graviton Theory.......evolution FAILS hard.

  • @buffboynick - "Your MISunderstanding of the theorized process of evolution and shared ancestry is LAUGHABLE."

    That's funny; it is part of what I do for a living. In what discipline did you obtain your PhD? What is your background in the biological sciences? I see that you avoid the question.

    "I research BOTH sides,"

    LOL!! So, you research it from the science side & the Muslim side? Both sides? What both sides?

    You're an IDiot, I see. FYI, ID isn't a science... juvenile moron!

  • @CamW30 you seem like the juvenile  terd

  • @CamW30

    Number 1.....You're NO scientist and that is OBVIOUS

    Number 2....."muslim side"???? WTF

    I belong to NO RELIGION

    I am a "realist" and truth-seeker.

    Muslims think Allah made all life here you clueless MORON.

    I say extraterrestrial genetic engineering did. BIG difference. You're a "special" kind of stupid.

  • @buffboynick - "I say extraterrestrial genetic engineering did"

    Oh, that's much more plausible than "goddunit". You don't even realize the problems with your theory, do you? What a joke you 2 are! (I also see your computer doesn't possess Spell-Check).

    Both sides?! UFOs & greys, huh? Morons!

    BTW, what are you doing posting on a creationist site?

  • @CamW30 arnt you the elitist shitwipe

  • @CamW30

    Actually genetic engineering (which is capable by us humans now) is not only PLAUSIBLE but obvious in the Human Genome.

    It also explains the surgical mutilations of cattle and humans (which the FBI and ATF are still baffled by)

    Here's your explanation....

    "Uhhhh evulution dunnit durrrrr"

    Talk about HYPOCRISY from a FOOL

  • @buffboynick - "It also explains the surgical mutilations of cattle and humans"

    You really don't see how ridiculous you are sounding, do you? Keep reading your the "scientific journal" Atlantis Rising. Cremo's been proved wrong many times over by real archeologists.

    "Actually genetic engineering (which is capable by us humans now) is not only PLAUSIBLE but obvious in the Human Genome"

    I'd love to read any peer reviewed articles that you may have on the subject.

  • @CamW30 how has micheal cremo be wrong so far according to you regressive types?

  • @CamW30 and you are no archeoligist name those suposed real archeoligists

    and lets see how much or any integrity they have

  • @james1014328 - "name those suposed real archeoligists"

    Just Google: "michael cremo debunked"

    BTW, it's spelled, "archeologist"

  • @CamW30 write down all the claims that prove him wrong let me guess a bunch of dorks such as your self made that documenery cause youtube trolls like you you have nothing better to do?

    if you have balls why not get the people who made it or try to debate him yourself instead of others doing it for you?

  • @james1014328

    I think we thoroughly destroyed them lol

  • @buffboynick - "I think we thoroughly destroyed them lol"

    I think that you must be reading posts on a different video. What conclusions do you think that other readers will come to? Be honest with yourself...

  • @CamW30

    I think they look at the evidence supporting "shared ancestry" and macroevolution and come to the conclusion its INSANITY and nonsense.

    Then compare that to the evidence of extraterrestrials (which is MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE that they dont exist) and realize all the tangible physical evidence showing their "projects" here on Earth are blatantly obvious to everyone.

    So much so that the News people eve take it seriously now. China had to shut down an airport due to a UFO__FACT

  • @james1014328 - "write down all the claims that prove him wrong"

    Spoon-feeding you information will not help you learn. Scroll through Google hits & find out for yourself. Cremo has claimed so many idiotic theories that I could spend weeks looking up where he went wrong. Besides, it's not my field of expertise; I just read his stuff for a chuckle. A person's got to have a hobby.

  • @CamW30 number one evoluion is not a fact i have an open mind and a skeptic mind

    spoon feed? now dont be a hypocrite

  • @CamW30 it seems you are more loyal towards maintaining an ideology than seeking the truth

    so good day to you sir

  • @james1014328 - "it seems you are more loyal towards maintaining an ideology than seeking the truth"

    Uh, no. You mistake empirical evidence for ideology. Some day you may see the light. Remember, opinion is not evidence, & testimonials are not fact. Wading through the bullshit to find pearls is not easy, & you will find some nuggets that will look pretty, but end up smelling a little ripe when dissected.

    Cheers mate, have an interesting life.

  • @CamW30 same logic goes to you assmonkey opinion is not fact i agree with you there

    but all you have is worthless speculation so im done with all this bs until next time peace

  • @james1014328 - "but all you have is worthless speculation"

    Again, please read the scientific literature, or at least acknowledge the vast amount written on evolutionary theory. Evolutionary theory is hardly "speculation". Yes, much of the literature is too technical for you to follow (& some is too technical for me, as well, but I can follow the genetics in depth), but realize, all that gobble-de-gook translates to empirical evidence. It is checked & rechecked by other scientists.

  • @CamW30 don't lecture me on reading but it is a shame you cant reach such abilitys

    you can deni all the facts that dont suport your idiotic theory all you want

    you are very contructive in your speech and bending people to how you think you whould make a good politican

    so go ahead you can have the last word you lead the way

  • @james1014328 - "you can deni all the facts that dont suport your idiotic theory all you want"

    Sigh! You will "believe" what you will...

    Peace (last word)

  • @CamW30 if you can't even prove the basic facts of macroevolution then why sound me and nick take you seriously? everthing you say is taking with a grain of salt you should know by now

    you insist that we are fundamenlist you have a lot more in common with them than you think

  • @james1014328

    excellent comment

    Evolution = the new time RELIGION

  • @buffboynick i wonder if they have a ministry yet lol

  • @james1014328 - "if you can't even prove the basic facts of macroevolution"

    Haven't been keeping up with the science, huh? I believe that the genetics of HOX-family genes, ERVs, & many, many other conserved genes, has put the dissension to rest. Only creatards & ETH-goofs, like yourself who are trying to prop up a faulty worldview are still deluded.

  • @CamW30

    ERVs prove evolution the way artwork proves unicorns exist.

    FAIL for you.

  • @buffboynick elasmotherium is in the fossil records (a horse-like relative of the rhinoceros). It lived long enough that primitive humans could have told stories about it. So there is more evidence for unicorns than there is for your imaginary aliens.

  • @PinkProgram

    Once again dear.....NO.

    7 different labs and universities verified the composition of ALIEN IMPLANTS surgically removed from abductees__FACT

    Surgical cattle mutilations were investigated by both the FBI and ATF in 1979 and ruled "unexplained". They continue today by the way in 2011. They also happen to humans too__FACT

    There is so much testimony from ex NASA, ex military, and ex government officials concerning alien visitation of Earth its mind boggling.

    So NO, WRONG!

  • @buffboynick bad monkey. no banana for you. Testimony is worthless.  The evidence just conveniently "disappeared" right? Idiot.

  • @PinkProgram you have't shown evidence so back at you  no banna for you

  • @buffboynick - "7 different labs and universities verified the composition of ALIEN IMPLANTS surgically removed from abductees"

    Please name those labs & universities; someone's been feeding you lies. A discredited foot doctor is not a reliable person to be removing "alien implants".

    BTW, alien abductions use to be called incubi & succubi. Both are a result of hypnopomic & hypnagogic hallucinations (ie sleep paralysis). You really are unable to consult the scientific literature.

  • @CamW30 you take lies as the truth why take it out on others dude just quit your case is worthless

  • @buffboynick - "Gene Depletion = produces NEGATIVE mutations and abnormalities

    Understand dipwad?"

    Um, I do, but you don't. Explain what you mean by the above statement & why it is relevant to your argument, in your own words.

    Paraphrasing the famous words of Inigo Montoya, "I do not think it means what you think it means."

  • @CamW30 what do you think it means jackass?

  • @buffboynick - "An insult to true intellectuals like myself."

    LOL; that's the funniest thing that you've said, so far. So, "true intellectual", where did you receive your training? Self taught, huh? I think that you might have missed a few lessons.

    "You're defending a girl that claimed to "not be a human"

    No, I am defending science.

    "You Darwinist clowns have NEVER found the mythical "shared ancestor"

    That's a strange statement; why would we have to?

  • @CamW30 why whould you hafe to?  you said it all

  • @CamW30

    Nope, believing in mythical UNFOUND ape-men shared ancestors is NOT science.

    Number 2....

    Explain to us all the process of "devolution" that would have had to occur if chimps and us humans shared an ancestor with a bipedal ape-man????

    Talk about a CONTRADICTION.

    Homo Sapiens go on to trump all species on Earth and the Chimps walk around on all fours in the jungle. Its hilarious you clowns dont see that MAJOR FLAW!!!

    what a JOKE

  • @james1014328 - "I dont see proof"

    So, because you are unable to follow the science, the evidence must not exist? I believe that is an argumentum ad ignorantiam. Try reading a basic book on evolutionary theory. Jerry Coyne's, "Why Evolution is True".

    "you only cherry pick what fits your framework"

    How would you know? You have no idea what evolutionary theory is, let alone be able to follow the evidence. The evidence is so voluminous you would have to be blind not to see it.

  • @CamW30 i have no idea what evolutionary theory is? lol

    i here it is this it is that its bullshit get it throw your delusional skull

    evolution is just time. that it is not species tranformatiotion it is or not make up your minds lol

  • These ev-LIE-utionists are proof positive of brainwashing and propaganda

    Pure nonsense and unintellectual drivel.

    An insult to true intellectuals like myself.

  • @buffboynick preach brotha preach haha

  • @buffboynick I've seen your channel. You don't have an original thought in your head. Just a list of your favorite quackery. Why don't you actually make a video. Why not show how your hypothesis furthers science as opposed to evolution which does just that. Show us these aliens you keep talking about. Show where in the human genome all the alien genes are. You aren't afraid the real scientists will rip you apart now are you? Come on and show your work. Pathetic.

  • man idioits are coming out the wood wook lol!

  • send us proof of your claims send us links videos or something other wise stfu

  • @james1014328 No problem

    /watch?v=zi8FfMBYCkk

  • you jack ass's can not even prove the basic facts of macro evolution step off and go back to your cult

  • again there has never been a change in the fossil records ever not one

  • @james1014328 Are you expecting fossils themselves to change?

  • @TheScienceFoundation so you are admiting to a design?

  • @james1014328 So you are just going to put words in my mouth instead of answering my very reasonable (given the circumstances) question?

  • @TheScienceFoundation im not trying to doge anything you try to sit here and charecter assainate all you want you are no differant you doge my qustions and buffboynick's like a bat out of hell

  • @james1014328 Then answer my question

    Do you expect fossils themselves to change before our eyes? Is that what you consider a transitional fossil?

  • @TheScienceFoundation

    do you expect us to believe micro-adaptations and neutral mutations (which have been documented over MILLIONS of years to NEVER radically alter DNA) to be responsible for the incredible bio-diversity here?

    I think NOT

  • @buffboynick Do you ever plan to explain where you're getting the idea that anyone is supposing drastic changes occur from generation to generation?

  • @TheScienceFoundation if species magicaly change into another one overtime then how do the offspring reproduce? i love to here this

  • @james1014328 Who is claiming species magically change? You keep dodging my questions.

  • @TheScienceFoundation you keep doging my questions so i will doge yours as well two could play at that game

    once again you admit to design and no im not a bible thumper

  • @james1014328 I asked a very reasonable question in reference to your claim. You said fossils don't change and I asked 'Do you think fossils themselves are supposed to change?'

    Do you realize how ignorant your claim sounded now?

  • @TheScienceFoundation if i see a cat magicaly change into a cow then i will be convienced

    why whould i expect fossils to change on there own when i have seen no changes at all please as a coherent question

  • @james1014328 A cat changing into a cow would disprove evolution... A cat becoming a cow-like animal is possible though. Hyenas are dog-like cats ;D

  • @PinkProgram wait a sec a cat changing into a cow whould disprove evolution

    i thought evolution was based on radical species transformantion you are confused as it seems

  • @james1014328 - " i thought evolution was based on radical species transformantion"

    No, you are the one who is confused. I see that you don't even have a basic understanding of evolutionary theory. There is no "radical species transformation" in evolution.

  • @CamW30 ok have it your way then  i know the THEORY has changed overtime but i dont see proof of it all i see is variations

  • @james1014328

    The ape-man believers "cherry pick" their science and move the goal posts to suit their needs.

    Their are devoid of any LOGIC or scientific understanding of Biology

    Glad you have a brain ;)

  • @buffboynick wow are you deluded. Hand me your sophont card and get out of the gene pool ^_^

  • @PinkProgram  shit if you where removed from the gene pool there might be real progress

  • @james1014328 I'm not in the gene pool. No genitalia = no reproduction. I couldn't breed with you monkeys anyway. I don't practice bestiality ^_^

  • @PinkProgram

    I ONLY have the genes to produce more of my kind (humans)

    Since you claim to "not be human" then go have sex with someone or something and produce a NEW species, hahahaha!!!

  • @buffboynick I don't have genitalia you nitwit.  Don't go sullying the primate gene pool with whatever is wrong with you. I need humans to get smarter and you aren't helping. Define kind. That is not a biologically relevant term. Humans are the same "kind" as chimps ;D

  • @PinkProgram

    Chimpanzees = never walked on the moon, never made music, never developed complex language, never developed the computer chip, never developed medical lasers, never developed the atomic bomb, never found the DNA molecule

    If you honestly have the NERVE to associate modern man with chimp, then you're a LOST cause.

  • @buffboynick You've never done any of those things either and I'm sure chimps have been in space more than you have. Go crawl back into a tree and eat a banana troglodyte.

  • @PinkProgram have you seen this go down? holyshit please send me a link lol

  • @james1014328 watch?v=rLbCBtqTpKo

  • @PinkProgram ok

    

  • @PinkProgram show were they can constuct anything with out human intervention

  • @james1014328 show me where buffboynick can construct something. I said chimps had been in space more times than he has, and then I backed it up with evidence ^_^

  • @PinkProgram you can do better than that just ask him he might send you links still not jumping on the bandwagin

  • @james1014328 cats and cows are contemporaries from different branches. A cat can become cow-like, even identical to a cow, but a cat can never become a cow. Like I said hyenas resemble canines but they are felines. It takes several generations. If a cat magically turned into a cow one day that would disprove evolution.

  • @TheScienceFoundation were have they changed answer that

  • @james1014328 Answer my question, are you expecting fossils themselves to change after we dig them up? Yes or no.

  • @james1014328 tiktalik

  • @PinkProgram

    Explain to us all RADICAL bio-diversity here by using "mutations"

    CANNOT be done

    Impossible, illogical, and as modern genetic engineering shows (which is being done by us humans NOW) the lab-induced hybridization of plants mimics the so-called "evidence of evolution" PERFECTLY

    Everything you NEED to know can be learned by studying bio-engineering and gene splicing.

    Lloyd Pye = TRUTH

  • @buffboynick Explain to us where you're getting the idea that anyone (who isn't retarded of genetics) is claiming that radical changes occur from generation to generation?

  • @TheScienceFoundation

    Wake up call....

    This planet = Bio-engineering experiment

    Add in the surgical mutilations, the lab prove alien implants, the mass UFO sightings, and the testimony of ex CIA/government officials and its OBVIOUS.

    If thats not enough.....

    The research the SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE of Lloyd Pye. The man has analyzed the human genome extensively and compares it side by side with gorilla, chimp, and orangutan sequencing.

    Hello!!! Wake up!!!

  • @buffboynick So I guess that's another dodge on the question of where you're getting the idea that anyone is claiming evolution = drastic change between generations.

  • @buffboynick PYE DOES NOT HAVE ANY TRAINING IN BIOLOGY. Why are you basing anything on what he has to say. What sort of biologist would listen to such bunk? I'll just let you keep talking. You just keep hurting your own case ^_^

  • @james1014328 so they have never found a fossil? Every time they find a new fossil the fossil record changes.

  • @PinkProgram most of the fossil's that i have seen have no shared ancestry at all

    can a lion have sex with a shark? no 

    if species change into differant species overtime then how can the offspring reproduce? the only thing that seems to occer is variations that is it nothing else all you have is speculation nothing more

  • @james1014328 - "can a lion have sex with a shark?"

    Are you serious?

    "if species change into differant species overtime then how can the offspring reproduce?"

    Mutations are small changes not affecting reproduction. You have to consider the time periods involved for species to become different enough to not be able to reproduce. The last common ancestor of lions & sharks were 100s of millions of years ago. No one would think that they could reproduce after so long a period of time.

  • @CamW30 are you serious

    break down the timeline for me

    still not converting 

  • @james1014328 - "if species change into differant species overtime then how can the offspring reproduce?"

    Pick up any textbook on claudistics (or Google it). Pay particular attention to phylogenic systematics.

    "still not converting"

    I couldn't care less; you can remain ignorant for your entire life (it gives my offspring a much better chance of succeeding in life). Facts are facts; what "you" believe will not change reality.