Added: 6 months ago
From: jackohoft
Views: 44,466
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,999)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • created freedom? lol... yah thanks USA the world sure is a fucking free place

  • Obama supporters are just as ignorant as the W supporters were during his reign.

  • @skinvil3

    well said

  • Sounded more like wooooooo than boooo... Too high pitched to be a booo, when people booo its usually a lower pitch... Ron paul all the way.

  • I Usaly dont use caps lock but i felt a little silly in lowercase with all these brilliant comments that in HUGE letters.

  • FUCK ALL YOU MOTHER FUCKERS THAT DONT LIKE RON PAUL.. RON PAUL ALL THE WAY FUCK WITH US!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • LOL. There are more people cheering than booing. The ones booing are inbred retards.

  • Why can't Santorum die of AIDS?

  • LMFAO!!! Rick Santorum should not be allowed to speak!!!

  • "When we come back, we will try to get a hold of things." 

  • MYRTLEBOX PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU TAKE CARE AT THE SAME TIME OF THIS JACKDOOLEY JERK.

  • RICK SANTORUM IS AN IDIOT WHO HAS NO PLACE IN MODERN SOCIETY!

  • RON PAUL IS THE ONLY DECENT CHOICE IN THIS COUNTRY!

  • HOW DARE YOU PUT DOWN THE ONLY POLITICIAN IN THIS COUNTRY WHO HAS PLACED INTEREST OF PEOPLE AND THEIR FREEDOM OVER CORPORATES AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHO IS CORRUPTED BY CORPORATES.

    HOW DARE YOU!

  • These republican and democrat ding dongs is exactly the reason why we ARE BROKER!

    WAR PROPAGANDA IS WHAT THEY SOLD US AND MADE MONEY OF AMERICAN PEOPLE.

    RON TELL THESE IDIOTS!

  • Rick Santorum is such a bitch for interrupting him...

  • If Rick Santorum becomes president, I will denounce my US citizenship and move to Europe. I am so tired of these pricks and the stupid warmongering 'patriotism.'

    Yeah Rick - let's go to war with every single country out there. Get the printing presses ready for another $15Trillion of debt. Let's not build infrastructure, let's just go pump lead into deserts around the world - GO US!

    If this fucker gets into office, I may have to snipe him out of it.

  • @myrtlebox

    We do it for Israel

  • @DownhillAddiction That a partial reason. But Republicans (Paul excluded) have the same knee-jerk reaction WHENEVER an 'enemy state' is on the threshold of nuclear capability. Being the worlds police force is crushing this country. Furthermore, we don't spread freedom/democracy. We spread fear/hatred. Paul is absolutely correct here.

    FOX agenda is hardline and forces candidates to take hardline postures to be viable for Reps. FOX ignores him because of this.

    RP2012

  • @myrtlebox

    I wasn't saying that because we do it for Israel is a good thing. I agree with you!

  • Kindly re-title this video "Ron Paul Knocks it Out Of The Park"

    Thanks.

  • Comment removed

  • Nut Ron Paul? Military personnel disagree.... The Republican party has lost its ways. Look at what the Republican platform used to be. Non-interventionism is the only way that this country can live on.

    P.S. He was also cheered you moron.

  • what the fuck

  • Comment removed

  • i hear more cheering then booing.

  • Ron Paul 2012!!!!!!!!!!

  • Very misleading title, and I have to say that as someone in the military, I agree with Ron Paul on this one.

  • @pv2dhill It isn't misleading, actually. It's your opinion that Ron Paul ISN'T a nut. If you were wiser, you would notice that opinions are never fact.

    Basic stuff here.

  • @mechaspark1 I would say that you are correct and that the opinion of him not being a nut is exactly that, an opinion. I would however like to know why you think he is a nut.

  • @pv2dhill Click the video entitled "Why Ron Paul can't be president".

    If that, however, doesn't convince you (which would be shocking) I don't know how else to save humanity.

  • @mechaspark1 I will watch it, but are you saying that you would vote for Santorum? Because that should be considered a crime against humanity.

  • @pv2dhill Haven't decided yet. But DEFINITELY not Ron Paul. Though, why would it be a crime? What did he do?

  • @mechaspark1 Just look up some of the horrible things that he believes in. He is the only candidate that literally said that having free speech is bad for you and that he would censor the internet. The guy wants to ban porn for fucks sake, who does he think he is to dictate what people watch? <------(referring to Santorum). I don't know who I am going to vote for, but I know who I am not going to vote for so far.

  • who added the booing i watched this debate live and dont remember it like that at all

  • Ron Paul 2012

  • Paul's cult gets on my nerves sometimes, their a minority of public opinion and yet they act like voting for him in common sense, he may be the best choice when it comes to picking a Republican leader, but all of them are bad choices at the moment. So every time a video says something bad about Paul they swarm it with their negativity and then say Paul is the only candidate that will change anything despite the fact that he's a retrogressivist.

  • @Godzilla52 Maybe the founders were smart fucking guys who had it right to begin with. You call Paul a retrogressive person as if that is an insult. Paul wants to regress to a sound currency, a honorable foreign policy, and individual liberty. You progressives are really useful idiots, you always say progress as if it is a good thing, but you never realize what you are progressing into. The overspending of the US govt is the fault of liberals(democrats) and neoconservatives(GOP).

  • @Jononutoob Yes because a Decentralized government that protects liberty but doesn't intervene is an ideal one, just look at all the great things that happened in history because of governments like that such as the Irish Potato famine, the Great Depression, The Economic inequality that existed in the states before Teddy Roosevelt got in. Indeed this system that Paul is trying to bring back is the best one. Government spending isn't the problem it's the lack of it's involvement.

  • @Godzilla52 If you think the US federal government needs to intervene on any situation then it should be no shock we are in trillions of dollars of debt. The Great Depression didnt occur because of lack of government intervention. To think otherwise shows you had a liberal education. The government wasnt created to fix all the problems in your liberal existence, it was created to protect your rights. States have constitutions because they once had independence.

  • @Jononutoob Don't you realize the only reason the great depression was solved was because of government intervention, Roosevelt had to break parts of the constitution and the government stabilized the situation taking America out of the clutches of economic depression. You really think that Ron Paul's policies could have fixed the Great Depression back in the 1930s, government intervention in the economy is necessary for it's survival. also if your right why is U.S debt higher than Europe's?

  • @Godzilla52 No I dont realize that, because it isnt true. The Depression came in the 30s after a huge growth in our economy before that. After all, you cant have a depression unless you are doing well before that. Like you cant go to the bottom of the hill if you are already there. So the growth was a cause of low rates on credit from the recently created Federal Reserve. People got used to this until rates changed, certain wealthy people noticed and took their money out.

  • @Jononutoob But the Federal reserve was never controlled by the actual government, it's a centralized bank that acts autonomously from the government, it doesn't require public funding at all to sustain itself it gets most of it's money from corporate sources so it serves corporate interest, it's evidence of excessive deregulative polices and the corruption of bureaucracy, it was the lack of government action that solved this, not too much government.Paul's solution is unrealistic.

  • @Godzilla52 The government literally created the Federal Reserve. It loans to the US treasury and WE THE PEOPLE own that debt. You must be liberal to think corporations are the problem.

  • @Godzilla52 Paul's solutions are very realistic. You seem to think we can keep spending more than we take in and regulating corporations will improve the economy. Who is being illogical?

  • @Jononutoob Look at the World in the 1880s before the Federal Reserve, there where still recessions and the stranded of living before reform liberalism was terrible most people worked ridiculously long hours and had little (if no) worker rights, and infrastructure and sanitation was absolutely terrible, that is a world without government regulation were the delusion of laissez-faire reigns supreme. Without regulation most of us would still be in those living conditions.

  • @Godzilla52 The 1880s conditions had more to do with technology than labor laws. Since 1913(creation of Fed) the US dollar has lost nearly 99% of its buying power.

  • @Jononutoob but labor conditions were improved buy government intervention under Teddy Roosevelt, without government polices addressing the abuses of labor most of us would still be living in those conditions. The United States is proof that the Austrian economics that Paul so passionately advocates don't work because when it comes to the trickle down theory most businessmen increase their own wealth over their own employees.

  • @Godzilla52 So because greedy men horde the wealth in private industries, your idea is to let government regulate them. Were you born 5 days ago? Have you forgotten what government can do? You are talking about putting a corrupt government in charge of our entire economy. I agree that the wealth is not being circulated as it should in a free market. So what is stopping them from spending their money? Maybe they dont want to spend their money because they dont know what is coming.

  • @Jononutoob Your living in America the capital of corporate corruption and your accusing the government of the most corruption? it's true you cant stop greed but you can regulate the economy to prevent disasters caused by mistakes made by bankers and make sure they don't cause to much damage, if governments cause recessions explain to me how only countries with free markets experience then, there where no recessions back when Mercantilism was in use.

  • @Godzilla52 I know what America is but you have been indoctrinated with liberal bullshit. You think corporations became powerful by themselves. No, they had help from government. As long as government is involved in the economy in major ways then people are going to bribe government officials. If the government isnt involved then there is no need to buy a congressman. There are people who have used the government AND privates to take your wealth. Now you run to govt for help. Ironic

  • @Godzilla52 I would horde my wealth too if the govt keeps talking about raising tax rates and all the rest. What this economy needs is stability. Not ups and downs under government regulated economics but the steady growth that comes from free markets. Paul's ideas wont fix the world in 2 days because a free market is slow and steady.

  • @Jononutoob who's the one who was born five days ago? your the one saying that the free market has steady growth. Free markets are full of ups and downs and their were major recessions just as bad (if not worse) in World history caused by the illusion of a continuously growing free market, look at the economic collapses in the old Dutch Republic in the 17th century, the problem is bad entrepreneurial flops not the problems associated with government.

  • @Godzilla52 You are not understanding me very well. In a free market, things can go bad once in while but the markets correct themselves far quicker than what you see today. Another important aspect is the money. Fiat money with no value behind it ALWAYS fails. Did you know that in 2008 former officials for Goldman Sachs and other financial institutions were in govt positions and certain companies were sent to die by the government.You want Obama choosing what companies die or live?

  • @Godzilla52 I can admit that there is a problem with corruption in private institutions but let us not forget that private companies cant enslave us. government can. General Electric doesnt have a police force, Federal govt does. It is laws written by US government that FORCE companies to maximize profits. These people's job is to make money and maximize profits. And forcing them to do otherwise will drain America and give China more business. This is reality.

  • @Jononutoob Liberal bullshit? the evidence speaks for istelf, to anserw your question no i don't beleive corporations become powerful all by themselves, but it's a fact that regulation keeps corporations from becoming to powerful, do you think the World would be a better place with the Rockefeller family still in monopoly of American oil, of course not the government had to step in and regulate, do your research allot of the chairmen in the federal reserve have corporate credentials

  • @Godzilla52 Government is far more dangerous to your liberty than BP or General Electric. I am not saying remove all law and government, a free market allows the consumer to regulate industries. If you dont like BP for spilling oil, then dont buy their products. Instead you want to send the govt after them. You are running from one monster into the arms of a more dangerous beast.

  • @Jononutoob Secondly, me the one indoctrinated with liberal bullshit? I vote Conservative in my own country for your information, but there's a difference between realistic and unrealistic policies. America has a very small government by international standards most western countries have far bigger governments than yours but the American mindset is very anti-government and backwards in that regard, country's were the government have stronger regulations over the economy are usually more stable.

  • @Godzilla52 Backwards? Have you seen Europe? Europeans want the United state of Europe and that will destroy them, already is. You obviously are not American so you should shut the fuck up about "being backwards". Americans are not liberal idiots who think government can be trusted. You are going to be a slave of the UN, EU, IMF, and other international groups. You talk about realistic? Greece had a big government too, hows that working?

  • @Jononutoob Ok your argument is loosing it's validity here, all your doing is getting mad about how you believe Paul's nonsensical policies are right and swarming me with comments before i have time to retort, i'm the one trying to use a rational argument here and your insulting me and using vulgarity as if Paul is some sort of divine being that can do no wrong. and further more Liberal idiots? your the one being indoctrinated with anti-government sentiments. i'm thankful your a minority.

  • @Godzilla52 lol, you say im being indoctrinated by anti government sentiments, I think you are being indoctrinated by pro government sentiments. Who wins? The reason I got mad is because you obviously are not American and are judging my nation based on your European or un American liberal bullshit. If you love big government then keep it. Paul isnt divine but liberty is divine.Being a free human being is a pretty big fucking deal to me. You obviously like government up your ass.

  • @Jononutoob You realize that it's right wing propaganda that government can't be powerful and still allow people to be free, and don't accuse me of judging when your the one who's said liberal bullshit about a hundred million times. There's still billionaires in Sweden pall, your freedom won't be destroyed if government get's more power but your acting like it would be the end of the world. I suppose you'd prefer to follow Paul's magic freedom wand and instead be a slave to insurance companies.

  • @Godzilla52 Actually its fact that the larger the government the less freedom the individual has. Larger govt means more taxation, it means more regulation, more legislation, etc. I wont be nor cant be a slave to a private company. That is your liberal propaganda again showing its ugly head. They make it seem like those evil corporations are the problem, they arent. Who wrote the laws that corporations HAVE TO maximize profits? JP Morgan cant force me to buy their products. Govt can

  • @Jononutoob Ironic your accusing me of this liberal propaganda of evil corporations when your following the Neo-Conservative propaganda of evil government. Corporations aren't elected by the people you buy their products, if they beat all their competitors they will sell you a product with as high of a price as they wish, and if any competition tries to rise up they squat it, small businesses fall and you serve the monopolies instead, just look at J.D Rockefeller for your evidence.

  • @Godzilla52 Rockefeller used corrupt GOVERNMENT officials to get his wishes. Rockefeller couldnt get a monopoly if there wasnt this all powerful govt to bribe. You must understand this.

  • @Godzilla52 Stop being a child. Nobody here is talking about magic wands, you are trying to make me appear gullible for supporting Paul. Good luck with that. I know what liberty is and I know that private entities cant oppress me like govt can. I dont like how corporations work with govt to shit on the people. I dont like monopolies. But I am more than willing to live with greedy people as long as im not forced(by govt) to do business with those greedy people.

  • @Godzilla52 You obviously cant be from America. our politicians are corrupt, the voters dont matter. Americans believe in individual responsibility and American grit(hard work). I dont care if it is the year 3000 and we all have flying cars and the world is perfect, the government does not own me. government has no RIGHT to rule the economy. Just because you dont have economic independence in your land doesnt mean you have to spout your crap about taking mine.

  • @Godzilla52 I dont like greed anymore than you. And sure we can remove greed, and many more bad traits by becoming a police state and having govt in all aspect of the economy. But that is what freedom is about. Thomas Jefferson said he would rather face the consequences of too much liberty than face the consequences of too little liberty. I will agree with Jefferson on this one. What has your precious government done? How many CEOs have been prosecuted? Do not be a fool.

  • @Jononutoob (part 2:) and even then you can't deny that the Great Depression was fixed by government intervention and regulation under FDR, if Paul's was President during the Great Depression his policies would have been devastating for America's economic recovery. recessions are inevitable in a free market society and 'policies woulden't change that but government regulation and spending in the right area minimizes the damage, really under Paul's system you would have continuous instability.

  • @Godzilla52 A large reduction of capital in market caused Black Tuesday. And hopefully you know the story from there. Now the cause of the depression was a central bank manipulating interest rates. So how did FDR respond? Well he massively increased spending and gave us more govt involvement in markets. So how exactly would Paul's ideas not work? I admit Paul's policies would hurt for a lil while until the markets settle. But under Paul's ideas, you wouldnt have depressions.

  • @Godzilla52 Paul's policies would have prevented the great depression in the first place, that is what you dont understand. All you can think about is how to fix things right now, like a child you have no patience, you want quick fix. Well there is no quick fix. There is only delaying the inevitable collapse of our economy and dollar with massive injections of credit and borrowed capital. How have regulations worked when we are in nearly 40 trillion in debt(counting liabilities)?

  • @Jononutoob and your accusing me of being a child when your saying that Pauls policies would fix the Great Depression, you think monetary policy alone is enough to increase Well-being of everyone, but you do realize FDRS polices worked for the long term it was the switch to a Austrian styled Supply side take on economics from the 1980s to now which brought the focus again to short term economic policies, look at Sweden, their government regulates the economy and their thriving during recession

  • @Godzilla52 Sweden? Sweden doesnt have over 300 million people to pay for. Lets not compare the economies of Sweden with US. They are different animals.

  • @Godzilla52 And the answer to your question is simple. America has more debt than all nations because we are larger and spend more borrowed money. We cant afford all this warfare and welfare, but we get away with it by just raising the debt. You cant sit there and argue with me about Ron Paul when you think FDR had a reason to throw away American principles. You have no spine or integrity if you are willing to throw away the ANY part of constitution. No intelligence either.

  • @Jononutoob and also look at my country for instance Canada, our country is doing quite well during the recession and never went through all the chaos your country did during the recession such as the bailouts because of government is more regulated than yours is, the government keeps control over the banks so they never went as crazy as your banks did forcing us to bail them out. Plus we pay 10% more taxes than your does and yet our economic situation is far more stable. h

  • As a foreigner who lives in a different country I have more of an insight over US foreign involvement than this uploader or any small town american does. Rick Santorum just spews complete bullshit about Iran and says that they have the capability of making the world as we know it "be no more". Thats a lie and he knows it, all you have to do is look at the facts and the amount of resources they have. Not nearly enough to intimidate their middle eastern neighbours never mind the US.

  • @Shaftsus Dumb. Iran made oil go up today on mis information. You underestimate there secret agenda.Santorum knows what time it is, perhaps you should figure it out.

  • @Shaftsus Dumb. Iran made oil go up today on mis information. You underestimate there secret agenda.Santorum knows what time it is, perhaps you should figure it out.

  • RON FUCKING PAUL 2012 SO LICK MY BUTT HOLE!! (I'm FREE TO SAY THIS, RON PAUL TELL THEM)

  • @mannyska11 You may have to say that with a muslim dialect by the time Ron paul gets done with you! SANTORUM!

  • @amptoys Islam is a religion, not a language.

  • Support the troops....Support Ron Paul!! Santorum and his ilk got all wrong.

  • Haha Santorum's platform is the same as Iran's leader.

  • (0:35ish) And yet, Rick, you would suppress those same groups yourself if you had the power.

  • all u guys that dont think iran is our enemy are idiots!!! i spent 3 years in iraq 2 in afghanistan and i know an eod technician that disarmed 73 ieds and only 2 of those said they wernt made in iran, (they were made in pakistan). Not to mention the visas we got off the dead terrorists said thran on them!! do u have an explanation for this if iran doesnt hate us?

  • @TheBooster54 why would they like you?

  • @ComradOfUnity obvisouly u dont understand english very well so i will use big letters and write sloww... FOR THOSE OF U THAT DONT THINK IRAN HATES US YOUR ARE WRONG!!!

  • @TheBooster54 that is not an answer. believe what you will.

  • @ComradOfUnity That is an answer u just dont understand english. I will because when iran sets off a nuclear weapon in nyc ill be right there saying told u so!!

  • @TheBooster54 i wont argue you with you (in english). I am asking you why would they like you? have you done anything for them to like you? of course they hate you. And if you really did service in the military that is very honourable and i respect you. but dont be foolish friend.

  • santorum is a flake

  • @99trow , look how much the united states invested in the overthrowing of Libya. 95 percent of resources from NATO were provided by America. My great nation saved up to tens of thousands of lives because of this effort. And how can people Iike you reward us? By accusing us of constant illicity and covers up conspiracies. This earth would be nothing without us.

  • @99trow Oh how misguided you truly are. America didn't kill anyone civilians purposely? If it was up to America everyone would be free'd from tyrannical dictators. Why don't you condemn Russia or china fir vetoing a legislature in the UN to save the Syrian civilians who are getting slaughtered? Picture that by 100 times if America never intervened to bring down those horrendous dictators

  • Why the hell would they boo that :S

  • Santorum is absolutely delusional. Absolutely fucking crazy.

  • It´s all about Oil not about freedom or care of the Irani people. Ron has the reason from my point of view.

  • @TheJrv2damac Lol I misread his passage and was typing mine on my little touch. Wasn't thinking was I?

  • @SikFalcon13 And Pakistan supports Taliban, not terrorism. There's a prime difference. Look it up, the CIA, to my knowledge, created the Taliban. Don't even know why u brough that up

  • @bluefev3r I'm pretty sure people dont seem to realize the facts. They like to come up with their own conclusions that utterly have no parrell with history. I'm sure your one of the people that distort facts and history to entertain yourself, while demonizing America. Lol get real you pussy

  • ummm I can understand that terrorism is a very good reason to infiltrate a country and bring down terrorism ,but opression of other people in other countries ,Im sorry just isnt important to me! Idc if women dont have the same right in Iran..I dont care realy if other countries even enslave its people...Its none of our buisness, and we need to fix whats going on here and stop spending trillions on trying to press are beliefs on other countries and trying to rule the world!

  • @SikFalcon13 Our only ally in the mid east is isreal, case closed

  • @SikFalcon13 Ok 1) Pakistan is not a US ally. Did you hear what Leon panetta said with regards to our relationship? Lol Osama was hiden 1 mile away from their military base, oh and they didn't know..lmao. And Iran tried to slaughter the Saudi ambassador in D.C with hundreds of Americans in collateral damage

  • @bluefev3r Thanks for parroting the news, idiot. Do you use your own brain?

  • Lol, Santorum thinks Iran will be the end of the world as we know it...and also the people cheering were far more numerous than those booing, you could barely hear the boos. He doesn't want to throw our youth at another pointless war, he must hate freedom. Thats BS, Ron Paul gets that we shouldn't be wasting lives on empty threats, they might get a few nukes. We have over 300, any country that would dare to attack us with a nuke would have to have a death wish.

  • Videos that try to discredit Ron Paul always fail.

  • But in regards to time, if you'll notice, the debate rules called for 1:00 responses and :30 second rebuttles. Ron Paul's right. But his penchant for conspiracy theories seems to have rubbed off on his supporters. So stop it.

  • Tramples the rights of gays. That's rich coming from Rick "man on dog" Santorum.

  • Funny that Santorum is talking about others stepping on the rights of gays. The pot's calling the kettle black.

  • "exerted our influence to create freedom" You mean killing a bunch of people in a war so you can force a new government? And thats what people are calling freedom these days?

  • as always, anti ron paul video backfires!

  • Title should be changed to, Grandpa educates ignorant warmongering politician on the fact that you cant promote freedom with bombs.

  • @dragsterf I think europe would disagree with you! VOTE A PACIFIST RON PAUL!

  • Title FAIL

    

  • Can someone explain to me why Santorum had over a minute to talk, but they only gave Paul 30sec?

  • @Misterneedles Oh no, they do that to Paul all the time. Last time the bell rang for Santorum and they said "Go on you may continue" Now, when Paul goes to speak...they never give him enough time.

  • @Misterneedles Because Ron Paul is a fringe candidate.

  • @Misterneedles Yes. lots of people that can explain it. but their jewish so they wont,

  • @Misterneedles The rules in the debates are that if one candidate quotes another candidate in his speech, the candidate get 30 seconds to respond.

  • @Misterneedles BECAUSE RON PAUL IS A IDIOT!

  • @amptoys As the pot called the kettle black

  • omg ron paul you no good for usa get out you no kill brown people? dey have the scary nuke dat will kill us we need to kill them first duhhh GO USA GO ARMY HUMMERS DERP DERP

  • I cannot believe my ears when I hear Ron Paul say "We're spending trillions of dollars on war its time to end them !" BOOOOOOOOOOO! Are you kidding me ? You're right lets keep wasting millions of dollars so more Americans can blame the "economy" for not having a job and die in wars.

  • I FUCKIN LOVE HOW HE SAYS THE TRUTH NO MATTER WHAT!!!!!!

  • ...I heard cheers, not boos...

  • Romney has 0 chance of winning, he lost 1/4 of the vote in less than 10 seconds with 1 dumb statement.

  • LOL at all the desperate net trolling PAULTARDS here. Spending an hour stoned disliking this won't give your joke candidate any votes, lol.

    ROMNEY/RUBIO 2012.

  • 3/4 of those were cheers and woos! Not boos!

  • He got wayyy more applause than boos..

  • Ron Paul, for Christ's and America's sake, get out of the Republican party. Go run as an independent candidate.

    Having Ron Paul in the conservative party is like a gem stuck in a pile of crap.

  • booed by 6 idiots is the same as cheers

  • If Paul's foreign policy is absurd, then why does Michael Scheuer (former CIA Chief) and most members of the U.S. military endorse him?

  • Republicans really really really really really hate Obama.

  • This is old news anyway. Ron Paul has proven himself a nutcase on the national stage and barely made 7% of the vote in Florida...a pathetic 4th place finish out of 4 candidates. He's finished and thank God the majority of people in the REAL WORLD (not on the internet fantasy land counter-culture) are at least smart enough to not vote for him.

  • @LedWhisky69 Ron Paul is a nutcase because he does not want WW3? It's people like you that make me wish more money was spent to better this country's education system instead of pretending to be the world police and killing thousands of innocent people in the process. Get off the internet and go back to digging holes, lemming.

  • @1manmafia Excuse me, but describe to me which Republican candidate DOES want WWIII? Show me any evidence of this, please. I'll tell you, however, the idiotic candidate whose views are MOST LIKELY to lead to WWIII, though. Ron Paul. Isolationism/Non-Interventioni­sm is EXACTLY what led to WWII via the unimpeded rise of the Nasi/Fascist regimes. Read your history, you bloody moron, before running your damn mouth. Ron Paul would do the same with Iran/Islamonazis/Islamofascist­s.

  • @LedWhisky69 Are you kidding? Both Romney and Gingrich would LOVE to invade Iran. "Oh, we don't like it that they have a nuclear energy program even though it was supported by the U.S. since the 70's; even though Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons." Bombing countries for no valid reason at all isn't exactly going to spread love for America, genius. Idiots like you just love to decieve themselves with asinine bullshit when 9/11 happened BECAUSE of U.S. foreign policy. Learn something, please.

  • @1manmafia Wow, you really told me, didn't ya? Sure, love the phoney quote and "bombing countries for no valid reason" comment. That was pure brilliance. Too bad it's basically total bullshit just like you and the rest of lunatic Ron Paul nutcase supporters are. You people need to get a goddamn life and stop revising history to suit your feeble minded non-interventionst agenda. It isn't working, it hasn't worked, and Ron Paul's candidacy is DEAD.

  • @LedWhisky69 I'm sure you love phoney quotes considering how ignorant you sound. You probably think Bin Laden's motive for the attack was to "convert the infidels" or because "he hated our freedom". Lmao, I mean how stupid do you have to be to seriously beleive that horse shit? 9/11 happened because of corrupt U.S.-backed regimes and billions of taxpayer dollars being taken to support Israeli apartheid. If you could think for yourself I wouldn't need to be telling you this.

  • @1manmafia Wow, sir. Once again, you really told me. I'm officially a Ron Paul convert now. Where do I sign up? Do I need to go through a special initiation like join a snowball fight against Sean Hannity, post 1,000 "Ron Paul 2012" comments on YouTube, or do I just need to be certified as a delusional paranoid schizophrenic? Please, tell me quick because I'm eager to get started right away supporting the cause to legalize heroine and bury my country's head in the sand.

  • Comment removed

  • @LedWhisky69 Oh, that was great. Bravo! "legalize heroin!" Wow, that was clever! Except, if the right wing warmongers hadn't cried out to invade Afghanistan to oust the Taliban (because you know, the 9/11 hijackers were all from there, obviously), there wouldn't be such a problem with the opium trade because it was outlawed by the Taliban. In fact, $43 million was given to the Taliban to thank them for it..in 2001. But now they're bad! Oh yes, they're all heinously heinous!

  • @1manmafia AHAHAHA! Nice try, you Korean Muslim asshole.

  • @LedWhisky69 Very intelligent response! What will be your next groundbreaking statement: "HAHAHA You are of a different background!"? Or perhaps the more honest "I have nothing worthwhile to say so I resort to ad hominems you would onyl expect from an inbred prepubuscent child living in Alabama!" Keep going, it's amusing!

  • @LedWhisky69 Apparently, a "Korean Muslim asshole" knows more historical facts, backed up with logical arguments, than you a white male that still drinks milk, only resorts to insults because he knows his arguments are fallacious.

    Wake up to reality, you are no intelligent than a 1st grade kid studying in Asia when your American system of education have been churning morons like you.

  • @LedWhisky69 Here's an unrevised history lesson for you, Forrest. Iraq was invaded by the U.S. under the Bush administration (without the approval of Congress), on the grounds that Iraq had, without a doubt, and i'm quoting Cheney here, WMD. Turns out, they found NOTHING of the sort after they got through bombing the hell out of country's infrastructure. "Whoops! Just killed over 100,000 innocent people cuz of misinformation! Sorry!" And you think it's logical for that to happen again? Pathetic.

  • @LedWhisky69 Oh, and news flash, dumbass: The U.S. only entered the war after it was attacked at Pearl Harbor. Tell me WHEN Iran has ever attacked us in the past 10 years? Tell me WHEN Iran has ever invaded or attacked ANY COUNTRY AT ALL in the past 100 years? Think, idiot! Ron Paul is the only Repub. candidate with a modicum of rationality. That fascist adulterating asshole Gingrich and that spineless liar Romney will turn out just like Bush. Don't tell me you honestly want that.

  • @LedWhisky69 99% of the Austrian public voted for Hitler to appoint his own Chancellor over them. Seems like only 1% of the public were right in Poland. RON PAUL 2012

  • Ron Paul won't become president. this is for sure.

  • @susliq86 why not?

  • Ron Paul 2012

  • @ipc353 ^^FAIL^^

    VIVE ROMNEY/RUBIO 2012!

  • you moron, he was cheered!

  • Rick Santorum is a total nut case.... I live in Dubai, which is basically across the sea from Iran..... that freakin' moron's idea of the Middle East is so warped it's unfunny.

  • ummmmm they actually were cheering for him... you must be deaf...

  • @nate1454dog they were booing too, selective hearing much?

  • the NUT is you my friend not ronpaul