Tajikan -Balkh/Bactria -Aryana the birth place of Zoroaster

[TheAFGpersiangirlAFG]

Baktrien:

Das Land war für seine Fruchtbarkeit und seinen Reichtum berühmt. Es wurde daher auch das „Reich der 1000 Städte“ genannt.

[di89meganew]

zenda bod oini niyogonamon,,, love you from Tajikistan !

[Leader2OO7]

Let´s see who accept you. I do live outside of Bulgaria, in Germany. I have the better word to say where you stand right now for the powerful european nations. And your state belongs to the 10 last ones. Good luck

[Leader2OO7]

Why don´t you explain your theories some real linguists? bulģha "to mix, shake, stir", derivation bulgak "revolt, disorder"; Late antiquity: a guide to the postclassical world, Pg. 350-360; by Glen Warren Bowersock,Peter Robert Lamont Brown,Oleg Grabar

[Leader2OO7]

Beside that, you loser, why your Bulgarian scholars can´t show the so-called Ashharatsuits to real experts? Why do they hide it if they have any evidances? Ever asked yourself this question? Moron

[gringoroko]

@Lea, your a 100% bitch boy. The Ashharatsuits is an armenian historic document, which is situated in the National Academy of Science in Yerevan and which is accessible to every historian. Again no proofs, no evidences from you, only diaria flowing from your crippled tajik head. Turks have ruled Bulgaria for a little less than 500 by the way, u haven't check that neither.

"Your ancestors were niggers, Turks, , Jews, Cave-monkies" . That´s exactly what a tajik is. We are not black.

[Leader2OO7]

@gringo

Just go and show them to the experts? Where are those ''Armenian documents''? Why noone, except Bulgarians have heard and found them? What a random that such a ''document'' came out from nothing to this beautiful earth which is written for more than ''1700 years ago'' but till today noone knew it, but except the Bulgarians who randomly tucked it out of their asses when the Soviets broke up and Bulgarians had to look for a new identity...oh yes..I am still waiting for the doc.

[gringoroko]

@Lea you have no idea how much i laughed at your profound analysis what is a slavery and what is not and how tajiks have lived freely and proudly in the Sovijet union and how the poor bulgarians were left desperate outside it. Maybe u r proud that the tajiks were behind almost all USSR states in terms of education industry and health care and etc. Maybe because u lived so well, immediately after the collapse of USSR u started a civil war. And in the meanwhile we entered the EU.

[Leader2OO7]

@gringo

in list of the UN Bulgaria does not differ from other third-world countries, you moron. The EU does not want you because your economy is zero, your policy is dictatorship, your medias are for a nut. You are laughing about Tajiks but you forget that those Tajiks of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Afghanistan f**** your Soviet masters to stop riding your mums. Inform yourself about the era of 1981-1991 of Central Asia and specially of Afghanistan, you faggot uneductaed dumbass turkic slave.

[gringoroko]

@Lea,

hahah, keep dreaming, poor tajiki boy.

"Economy zero, policy is a dictatorship", heheh. Seems that we r quite smart ,coz we somehow made everybody in the EU to think that we were ready for the EU and to accept us. From what your writing i can conclude that you have no clue about the situation in Bulgaria,hahahah

[gringoroko]

@Lea,

Why did you escape the topic about the Ashharatuits , amall penis?? Got surprised,ahh? Now, after you were defeated in history you try to minimize the humiliation by changing the subject to the EU and how "bad" our economy is . u r pathetic. i am not playing that game. From now on you r not interesting. Cheers and Good buy.

[gringoroko]

As for my proofs, ok. Because i know how much u like Wikipedia, here you can read more about the Ashharatsuits. Write down Anania Shirakatsi in google or wikipedia. Why him? because hes the author of the geography. when you go to that page, have a look at the paragraph "Geography" , for instance, and enjoy reading it. 

[gringoroko]

The root of Bulghar is not Bulgar, moron, it is Bul. " -gar" is an ending, it is like -ness in the word mad-ness.

In fact, in latin we falsely write B-u-l-gar due to the lack of letters in the latin alphabet which correspond to the 27. letter in Bulgarian language. Phonetically, the correct form is B-a^{~}- lgar, not B-u-lgar and one should read it as B-a^{~}-lgar., which is close to "Bal". Check how Bulgar is written in Bulgarian and than translate it phonetically in English.

[gringoroko]

I told u not to bother but u crowed like a cockroach from your little shit-hole just to spit shit again. A poor tajik imigrant who's searching a better life in Europe and has left his pathetic toilet country, sounds inconvenient and hilarious when hes calling other people niggers,lol. In conclusion i'll just say: If the origin of the name bulgar is not clear, the origin of the name tajik is very well known- a turkic word. So be a good boy and stop making noices.

[Leader2OO7]

@gringoroko

Bulghar is a Turkic word and means maradeur. The term Tajik is thought to be adoptet by Turks as they did to Tarkan, Yabghu and many other words. If you study the history of North-Eastern Iranians than you come very soon to words and people of CA who were called as Tayu-chi, Da-Yun and Dahae (Parthians). Thus, they used the word Tazik for all Muslims of Iranian background and specially for Persianspeaking Central Asians. Now before you make yourself more and more to a fool, educate

[gringoroko]

Oh yeah, one more thing, sissy-boy, slavs have never served gothes, especialy south slaves who have relations to present day bulgarians, LOL. In fact tajiks have served slavs in the sovijet union; in fact they even created you as an autonomous entity, but that is a different topic :))))))

[Leader2OO7]

@gringoroko

Living under Soviet emperialism is not slaverey but a political change but since you are partly the son of a Bulghar Turk you can´t understand that. You also do not see your own bloody and in fact slavery role in the soviet ''empire'' where you really threatend like slaves as Kasakhs were threatend. Have you ever asked yourself why your country was not important for the Russians? So wha is your arguments?

[Leader2OO7]

But who cares what you are or what you claim beeing? Noone is listening to you and for the world and real historians you are slavic people, descandants of slaves who served goths,

[Leader2OO7]

For you and your wet dreams every scientific sources, including genetical evidances, are invalid just because they spit in your Bulgar Tengrin faces. Accept the facts. You are neither related with Tajiks (who are the direct descandants of Bactrians and still the current population (85%) of the region) nor have any cultural or linguistic relationship, except speaking an Indo-European language. But it suprises me that you accept the Huns, self a confederance of Turks, Iranians...) as ancestors

[Leader2OO7]

You still try to root the name ''Bulgar'' with ''Balkh''. No. The Iranic name of ''Balkh'' was Zariaspa, became later Bahraa, than Bakhtaar and than in middle-age to Balkh. There was also an Indian city in Panjab with the name ''Balika''. Don´t come here with your obscour ''armenian historian''. Provide some proofs. I guess you can´t. Even your own historian can´t prove their filthy theories, just claiming and naming. As I said before...after soviets you became fully IDless. Pathetic Bulgar

[Leader2OO7]

You can also visit Britannica and Iranica. Both encyclops state that the original Bulgars, to whom on part of your ancestors belong and you adoptet the name of your nation, were Turks. Get it!!!!

[Leader2OO7]

The Bulgarians, but linguistic and genetic, are a south-eastern slavic people with some affinities to middle-east (Turkey, Azerbaidjan, South-Russia, Iraq). Now they still claim beeing ''iranic'' from Balkh. First of all the name Balkh is a middle-age name and did not existed in ancient times, secondly names like Asparukh etc. are titles and thirdly Sassanian Iran influenced the Balkan and east-Europeans more than Greecs. I still do not know why some IDless members of slavs try to fool themself

[gringoroko]

@Leader2OO7

I am not talking about modern bulgarians. I am talking about the acient bulgars. I don't consider myself iranian or perian or tajik or anything like that. No bulgarian would also claim such a pathetic thing. There is however a mystery about the origin of the bulgars. U write about them as if it is proven that their turkic as it is given. Well, till 90's noone really tried to understand their origin. Mainstream soviet scolars just accepted the idea that their r huns....

[Leader2OO7]

@gringoroko

ancient ''Bulgars'' were Turks or a related group to them, like the Avvars. Thank you and bye.

[gringoroko]

@Leader2OO7

You r so confused, it is pointless to talk with u. Just a vomit of moronic statements. Huns weren't turk by the way. It was a confederation of many people, alans for instance weren't turk. So u r talking crap. I accept genetical evidence-they confirm very well what i say- 0% haplogoups, which can be related to the turanic people. The turan race formed in the 5-6th century. The first sources about the bulghars were from 3. century. One more evidence spitting in ur face.

[Leader2OO7]

@grino

You moron, not only that you have a lack understanding of english but you seems more and more to be an idiot. Get some non-Bulgarian history lesson, uneducated moron. I know you Bulgars were slaves of Turks but that Turks gave their name to you and you proudly call yourself Bulgar is not a shame. It´s just a sign of beeing a slave of Turks for more than 1500 years. Get it. Your ancestors were niggers, Bulgar Turks, Thracians, Jews, Cave-monkies and slavic people. That´s what you are

[gringoroko]

@Leader2OO7

the "ash-haratsuits" is not an armenian historian, LOL, it means Geography in armenian- it is one of the eldest European geographies of the ancient world. The "obscure" historian was Michael the Syrian- Patriarch of Antioch in the 9. century. Of course i don't expect from a gypsy , who studies history from Dick-ipedia to know any of these things. Don't write me back, u r waste of time.

[Leader2OO7]

But such facts do not change the ethnicities of ancient people to another as some stupid lunatec Bulgarians try to prove. Their main problem is why they reject the fact that the first ''Bulgarians'' were Turks because of the islamic Turkish Ottoman rule on them for nearly 700 years. From historical and political view it is understandable. Ottomans tried to islamize Bulgarians, Serbs, Albanians, Greecs but they couldn´t do that to all and one nation of them were these Bulgarians

[Leader2OO7]

For those idiots who have their wet ''bulgarian 1001 night dreams'': Bulgarians are neither Iranic nor Turkic, but descandants of a mixery of Slavic, non-slavic Indo.europeans like Thracians and a small number of ''proto-Bulgarians'' who were ethnically Turks or atleast half-half. It is not a secret that many ancient europeans were strongly influenced by Iranic people, so the Celts by Scythians and Sauromatians or Turks and Mongols by Iranic Choresmians and Soghdians or Indians by Kabulians

[afg851]

the bactrians sired pashtuns, tajiks and pamiris...

[Leader2OO7]

@afg851

They aren´t loser boy. The Tajiks and their Pamirian subgroups with some Uzbek lines are the only descandants of Bactrians. Pashtuns had never been Iranians by definition. They are a hybrid nation with different origins. From Turk, Arab, Mongol, Jews to Dravidians, Indo-Aryans and some Iranian people from the Sulaiman Mountains and the nearer regions. Beside that, the ''Awghans'' were mentioned for more than1000 years as ''Ashvakan'' living on the Sulaiman Mountains (Pak/Afgh region)

[Leader2OO7]

@Leader2OO7

far away from cultivated Bactrians who are known for their great civilization, culture, language, history, arts, science and most of all beeing urbanic people etc. attributes that are not even after 2000 years common among Pushtun dogs. Today, this sellout Paki and Arab dicklickers are the victim of their own stupidity. Even the jews did not want their own stupid idiots and banned them from their society...those found themself again on the society of Ashvakan nomads, Awghuls.

[savaguerr0]

i've heard some theories that proto bulgarians once settled and created a country in today's Balkh/Bactria .. Now i realize there are so many coinsidences in some names.. for example we have a lake and a cave that are named "Aryana" ; one of the most interesting sights of medieval bulgaria is "The Madara Rider" a sculpture carved in the rocks of Madara(one of the few bulgarian towns that kept their names since their foundation in the 600s) and as i've heard.. there's Madara in Afghanistan too..

[LosBandaleros90]

Pashtuns are all so damn ugly motherfucker.

They all have no history or identy, thats why so many of them trying to steal history from the ones.

It is so amusing if some pashtuns claim afghanistan as their only homeland hahah...they dont even know that they are just a bunch mix of dravidians and semmetic(jew) people.

when a punjabi fucks a israeli woman that how you get a pashtun baby lol.

fuck them all from mullah omare kor to kharzaye beghairat.

[TigerEagleKhorasani]

Neither historical, nor lingual or ethnical Pushtuns represents Bactrians. Two different worlds. Pashtuns speak Iranic because of the influence of Persian and other Iranic dialects on it (I do not need to mention names like Bayazid Roshan who was a Tajik and who formed a apart of Pashtu grammar, or Sher Darvaza, another Tajik etc.). Not to forget that Indian languages had also strong influence. Today, majority of them live outside Afgh and only 22% of them live within Afghanistan. How comes?!

[TigerEagleKhorasani]

Pushtuns live 1000 miles away from Bactria. The Kharoti tribe of Kunduz are immigrants there who came there in the 20th century pushed by Abdurahman from Sulaiman Kuh. How can they be descandants of noble Bactrians? Beside that, Bactrians were not Nomads. They turned Nomads to settlers. Bactrians were known for having a culture, civilization, faith, honour...attitudes, that Pushtuns don´t have. Bactrians were Bactrians, while Pushtuns are a mixed hord of altayic, dravidian and Indian tribes.

[Leader2OO7]

They were build by slavic people and thracians in conclussion who absorbed Turks. Do Omartac and Kubrat not belong to Dulo? Aren´t the Dulos from Euroasien stepes, mainly from Altay? The Bulgars (also Bolgars, Bulghars, or Proto-Bulgarians) were a people originally from Central Asia, originating in the steppes spanning from Mongolia to Europe. Their linguistic and ethnic origins are a mystery, but evidence is strong that their elites were Turkic,[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8­][9]

[nunoyabiznis]

we were done here with my last comment.

you didn't know that?

[Leader2OO7]

Kere Tajik da kusse nane yaka yaka Pashtun e Dombdaar, kere Tajik da kunne Nnane Nunoyabiznis taka taka...PigTunwal e Harami who is pretending beeing a ''Tajik'' (Persian/Aryan). This mordagaw call himself as Tajik because his mother´s boy-friends in Kandahar were all of Tajik background and thus this raped product have lost his Pashtun attitudes and because of this fact and the shame he is pretending beeing a nobleman.

[Leader2OO7]

'The Bulgarian language is mutually intelligible with the Macedonian language.' 'Bulgar (also Bolğar, Bulghar and Proto-Bulgarian) was the language of the Bulgars. Very few records exist of the language and little of them is understood. Considered by most linguists to have been a Turkic language[1][2][3]''. Your name and the name of your lanuage you have from your Turkic father but that do not make out of you a Turk but first a slav while your turkish ancestors played not even a role

[thracianglad]

where from we have that Persian influence? U said it by most of linguist, but there are some who do not think so. Turkologist number one in the world admited the Bulgarian has no Turkic but Sarmatian runic alphabet. All of the names of our rulers are not Turkic just like Kubrat, Avitohol, Omortag, have you heard about our ruler with the name Persian? I don't think it's just an influence and the next time call your mother uneducated idiot =)

[nunoyabiznis]

hey brother i agree with u. u r descendants of the people of balkh as well. u guys even look similar + have clothing which matches that of balkhs

balkh was 1 of the oldest cities in the world. it was even called "mother of cities" by the arabs because balkh gave birth to so many civiizations which started different cities & empires. this guy is an idiot who argues with me, an ethnic tajik of afghanistan. he calls me pashtun because he has nothing else to say. which is funny as hell to me.

[Leader2OO7]

LOL why are you claiming BS you can not even prove since you do not have any? If your own BS is soooo correct, than you should have the balls to go on Wikipedia and change Bulgarian ancestory from hybrid (Turkic, Slavic, Thracian, Etruscian..) to 'Iranian', faggot idiot. Go, do it...accept the fact you have nothing to do with Iranian people and it´s civilization.

[Leader2OO7]

Genetical studies showed Bulgarians have nothing to do with Iranians but are more closely related with Greecs, Albanians and Turks of Turky (Tukified Greecs, Albanians, Kurds, Arabs etc.). Every scholar is spiting in your face. Even your own scholars accept the Turkish origine of Proto-Bulgars which in term itself is Turkic.

[gringoroko]

@Leader2OO7

Genetically bulgarrians do not share any common ancestry with turks. The mongoloid admixture in proto-bulg. skellets in the Azov see area was found to be below 1%. Far less than the asiatic admixture in the ukrainians and romanians, for example.

[Leader2OO7]

Not all names are non-Turkic, but as I mentioned earlier, some name of your rulers are ''Persian'' but that does not make out of you Iranic. Modern Turks all over the world, including the Mongols have also adoptet Persian names...so where is your logic? Tarkan, Yabghu, Beg etc. are all Irano-Soghdian terms borrowed by Turks, except the title Khan which was also used by your rulers. In your blog you do not only mentioned stupid claims, unproven and POVs of yourself but you make out yourself a

[gringoroko]

@Leader2OO7

The title Khan was never used by bulgarian rulers. This is false. Their title was "Kanasubigi", which scholars in the late 19.century( mainly russian historians researchers in Volga Bulgaria) due to the similarity to "khan" shortened wrongly to "Khan" because they thought that it must mean "khan".

[Leader2OO7]

Deep in your heart you know, no scholar and no science accept your nationalistic pseudo-science abt your origine. That´s why you idiots are hard on creating a new history and identity, specially after the soviet break-down. Btw, Omurtag is Turkic, as Kubrat is. Both are from the house of Dulo...a Turkic tribe. Now bark somewhere were stupid and dump people like you troll believe every nice late night anecdotes and wet dreams.

[gringoroko]

@Leader2OO7

Dulo is not a tribe. The names Omurtag and Kubrat r of iranian origin. This is undisputable. The same holds for Asparuh, Tervel, Presian, Irnik, Avitohol and etc.

I see that u learn history mainly from Wikipedia, where every shit-boy can contribute.

[nunoyabiznis]

@Leader2007

u r a kooni from the modern state of iran who is on here pretending to be from my country, trying to take our history & start shit between the people of afghanistan to make your job easier.

well fuck u kooni zancho. keep on trying beghairat e khar-kus.

[Leader2OO7]

Turks are ONE of your ancestors, as slavic people are another of your ancestors...that´s why your language belong to the slavi language family which self belong to the Indo-Germanic languages. 'Bulgarian (български език, pronounced [ˈbəlɡarski ɛˈzik]) is an Indo-European language, a member of the Slavic linguistic group.'

[Leader2OO7]

You can find Irano-Persian words in nearly all languages. There are more than 50 000 Soghdian and Persian words in the Turkic languages, more than 16 000 Persian and Avestan words in Arabic, including in the Qoran, the holly book of Islam. Words like ''Din'' which are related with Greec Daity and Dana'' or with Indo-Aryan Dan/ava are loan-words from Persian. Also Macedonians have IranoPersian words, Croats etc., so all of them are Iranic? Think rational instead nationalistic.

[Leader2OO7]

Still, 98% of ''Bactria'' are Tajiks. PigTuns are descandants of raped victims and Jews and wild cultureless conqueres like their Arab bedouine fathers and their Turko-Mongolian Ghaljizai fathers. Still Pigtuns have no culture, tough living so long in CA and SEA arounded by great civilisations and nations. Death to Pushtuns, death to these wahabiyy-Salafiyy Kharkusszaia. Jihaad against these KFRS!!!

[JohnTheAriahi]

dustane gerami reju kuned ba shah namaie ferdauasi tusi va bybined kie chie tedod az shahr ha kie ba name Iran iad shuda and dar Aughanestane emruz qaror dorand bad ba iran dashnom bedahed Iran iane Ariana zamin ba durud John the Ariai

[meget0000]

kos madari shoma iraniha, jai tawalodash balkh ast ama az iran ast damo iranit shaha knum

[TigerEagleKhorasani]

Ask you mother who loves Arab and Punjabi dicks. Balkh belong to your Kharkusswali culture and Taliban identity? LOL ...since when, Harami ? Your country is Talibanistan in south-eastern Afghanistan and you culture is Taliban/Terrorist, unrelated to the customs of Baktria/Sogdia. Haramzada...Balkh is Tajik/Persian..if you still want Balkh, come and take it if you have the balls or the sources for your claim. Tajiks will fu** your entire family and yourself for such a ridicolous claim. Tajik=Ar

[Shirio77]

Just wonderful!

[pavel4441]

Tajik? Balkh + Aryan = Balgarian

[thracianglad]

@pavel4441 The Tajik and Afghan people are also a descedansts of Bactria!

[TigerEagleKhorasani]

You are a faggot idiot. There is no ''Afghan'' that is descandant of Baktrians. The Afghanistan-Tajiks are descandants of Baktrians, but not a bunch of bastards that once living on the western Mountains of Pakistan, Sulaiman Mountains as nomads. Baktrians were no Nomads. All nomads were absorbed by them.

[thracianglad]

Bulgars were not nomads :D

Search about Pliska, Preslav and after that tell me, can one nomad tribe build such things.

BTW - Pliska was the biggest European city in the medieval!

[Leader2OO7]

@thracianglad

take some head-ache tabletts. Bulgars, who the hell are Bulgars? Bulgars are a Mix of Turks, Tracians, Slavs, Ethruscians and pre-indogrm. people. Bulgars just adopted the term of their Turkic ancestors. Your stupid dreams of beeing ''Bactrians'' consulted out of the fact that you are non-Muslims, while Turks as Muslims dominated your country for centuries as rulers to whom you do not to define yourself, idiot Bulgaars. Accept the facts of scholars instead dreaming much BS

[thracianglad]

Hahahah what fact? Can you proove that they were Turkic? I will tell you can't - I can proove you they are not with hundreds of things. Well I will tell you two of them the bodies found in the Bulgar graves are not Mongolic as what the Turkic were and the Bulgars are in Europe since 1 century AD - well then there weren't any Turkic peoples :D

[Leader2OO7]

LOL uneducated idiot, have you taken just one look to your own name, ohh great ''Bulgar'' idiot? You just repeat my own words that Bulgars are a mix hordes of slavic, turkic, tracians, ethruscians etc. who all became dominantly slavizised. And yes, inBulgaria, there are still Bulgars who have strong east-Asian features. The main origine of Bulgars are non-Turkic while Turks where absorbed by them who became also their kings. Slavic tribes flooded Bulgaria in the 7th/8th century.

[thracianglad]

I don't want to speak with stupid guys, can you proove me that we were flooded by the Slavs? There are no any artefacts from the Slavs and I don't tell you the modern Bulgarians, but the proto-Bulgarians called by you Turkic. What Thracians you are talking about what Etruscans? :D Well, it would be hard to explain where from comes the 3 000 common words in the Bulgarian and Pashtun language

[Leader2OO7]

OMGF, you uneducated idiot, even for an stupid ultra-nationalists who do not differ from turkish nationalists, Wikipedia, Encyclopedia of Christianity and Islamica should be enough. First of all, there are no ''common'' words in Bulgarian and Pushtu. The common words exist in Bulgarian language because of Persian loand-words. Name´s like Asparukh are Iranian, Persian and Sarmatian. Of course in modern Bulgarian there are your utopic '3000' iranic words but only because Irano-Persian influence

[gringoroko]

@Leader2OO7

Hope u know taht ethruscian lived on the Apenin Peninsula and not on the Balakns, so i think u r confusing notions very badly. By the way bulgarian historian do not claim that bulgars were persians-that would be misrepresentation of their point of view. Their claiming that Bulgars (Bulhi or Balkhi according to them) bolong to the large familu of indo-iranian people. Noone wants to be persian or tajik, that would be pathetic and hilarious.

[Leader2OO7]

@gringoroko

You want to claim on their lands! Your wet claims you can tuck in your mums front. If you want those lands and cities or history just go and take it, if you have the balls. Those ''Wikipedian Informations'' you laugh about are in fact cites of historians, scholars and scientists who have more knowledge and more brain than some descandants of slaves and servants of German tribes...slavic Bulgar.

[Leader2OO7]

According to some 20th century researchers as William Z. Ripley, Carleton S. Coon and Bertil Lundman the Bulgarians are predominantly Mediterranean people, with unexplained Pre-Pontic, East-Baltic, and Nordic strains, whose roots go back to the Neolithic.[52][53] As per 21st century studies of their DNA data, the genetic background of the Bulgarians has Eastern Mediterranean composition.[54]

[Leader2OO7]

Genetically, modern Bulgarians are more closely related to other neighbouring Balkan populations (Macedonians, Serbs, Romanians and Greeks) than to the rest of the Europeans.[55][56][57] The Bulgarians also have similarities with other Mediterranean populations such as Sardinians and Cretans.[58][59]

The numbers are the cites of scientifc works and books. Just click on them on wikipedia and you will come to the original pages.

[gringoroko]

@Leader2OO7

...because it was the simplest. There was also an ideology in this. However the only certain thing abou the bulgars is that we don't know much about them and that they with almost 100% certainty weren't turans. The first evidences came after bulgar skellets were antropologically examined and it was found that the turkic admixture was less than 1%.

[Leader2OO7]

The Antes (eastern Slavs) became part of the ancestors of the modern Bulgarians. Like the rest of their South Slavic neighbours,the Bulgarians are clearly separated from the tight DNA cluster typical for Western and Eastern Slavs. This phenomenon is explained by “the genetic contribution of the people who lived in the region before the Slavic expansion”.[45]

[gringoroko]

This provoked historians to search for eastern sources. In the armenian geography Ash-hara-tuits it is said that Bulghs (bulgars) come from Imeon (Pamir). Michael the Syrian ( aancient historian from 9. century) tells the same- Pamir-the region about Balkh. Many other sources too. I am aware of the stuff in Wikipedia, Britanica they are however old and invalid.

[nunoyabiznis]

buddy i am a ethnic tajik from adfghanistan. i accept the name afghanistan because that is what it is called now. & pashtuns also descended from bactria. they may be mixed up with some other groups. but they are still iranic people.

i just don't understand why iranians find it important to claim so much of afghanistan & try to take credit for everything? can u not accept the facts. what good is this bullshit doing u other than making u look stupid?

[Leader2OO7]

@nunoyabiznis

You are a Khar and a Ghool from the Sulaiman Mountains, your Oughanistan aka ''Pakhtunistan''. Bactria streched from Uzbekistan, Bamian, northern Afghanistan, south-western China and Tajikistan....PigTunwals are neither descandants of Bactrians, nor they have anything to do with Bactrians and neither they are ''Aryans'', but hybrids (bastards) that came up by the invading and conquering Turks, Mongols, Arabs who mixed themself with the local Pakis and Indians (PigTuns).

[nunoyabiznis]

i am an ethnic tajik. u goh khor e kus-kash. when u ASSUME u make an ASS out of U not ME. BALKH(Bactria,باختر Bākhtar ) is 1 of the oldest city's in the world. i have been to balkh last year. it is in modern day Afghanistan by mazar-e-sharif. & ur an ignorant fool who doesn't know ur own history. we r all iranian people of greater iran(Aryana ایران بزرگ.).

khar e ghool khodat asti....molomdar ast ke az kodam famil beab muzdur asti. hamrai khan harf zadan khoda faramosh kardi?

[Leader2OO7]

ROFL...you 9time stinking Aoghan naqleen (immigrant) go khor, first of all, keep your mother away from sucking Tajik balls otherwise more Persian-speaking immigrants from Sulaiman Mountains like you will talk in the language of Baktarzameen, Parsi and secondly, ''Balkh'' was not the centre, but Zariaspa, which lie near Dushanbe and thus, Termez, Dushanbe, Yaghgunai were part of it centre, including Balkh. What the fuck are you talking uneducated idiot. You have not the value to take use Balkh

[Leader2OO7]

Kerem da kusse nanet, Pushtun e Kharkusszai, I repeat again myself, Balkh and Bakhtartzameen in general are still populated to 98% by Tajiks. That´s, why non-Pushtuns kick your asses down to the lower-plate of Pakiland, that´s why you still get raped, that´s why your statue has even decreased to that of a toilette cleaner and a dirty filthy slave in form of a server in Tajik house holds, that´s why great Bakhtarians are can seen in all corners of Balkh which remember Tajik identity and pride

[Leader2OO7]

Now burn, fucking Ghoolcha. Btw, uneducated Sulaimani cave-monkey,the term is not 'Aryana' but Aryanam-Veaj. 'Ariana/Aryana' is the Greec term for Iran. Now go and do your job in Kabul or kANDAHAR,dirty filthy immigrant suicide bomber,cultureless and IDless monkey.Ou Hazaraa brothers have reached our hearts by their had working talents while you have reached out hates by your dirty semite identity and your semite behave, dirty jewo-arabic bastard.Go and rape some Pakis and create more Pastuns

[nunoyabiznis]

oh kooni,

zanhai ghar ware chura khoda para para dari? LMAO

ghool tu asti ke yak bar barayat guftam ke tajik astam.

wa az khanadan e astam ke babet barayash nokari mekad.

i know what iran & iran zamin is. why r u acting like a crazy fagot? if u r talking shit like this about a tajik what the fuck r u besides being a kooni?

[Leader2OO7]

Hope you are finished with your garbage, little Pushtun Kooni. Many Pushtuns whos mothers were licing Tajik balls identify themself today, or better pretend themself as Tajiks since they have lost their Kharkusstoo language. Btw, what history do a gypsie from the Sulaiman Mountains have? Your origine is Arabeo-Jewish, Turkic, Mongolic, dravidic and Indic and you were slaves for 1000 of years. Uneducated idiot, Balkh was not called as 'mother of cities'' but ''mother of states'', pagh o dagh o

[Leader2OO7]

It was just translated wrongly.

[thracianglad]

LOL Omurtag and Kubrat are Turkic LOOOOL :D

[nunoyabiznis]

bactria = balkh & is in afghanistan so of course.

[Aryana4ever]

Absolutely beautiful - This is true Aryan, Balkh, and Tajik culture.