Frank, There have been a few passionate explorers of Buckminster Fuller's Synergetics like Joe Clinton. Now we have some critics. Which is good and healthy. But because there have been too few explorers and too few critics, the kinks in our understanding of Synergetics have not yet sorted themselves out. And I, like you, think that Synergetics, requires some filling in of gaps and probably even the removal of several flaws. I am confident however that it can be built into a science.
So synergetics is not a study of a behaviour of a system unpredicted by the behaviour of it's parts taken separately? Is the premis of synergetics changing again?
It seams in the lapse time 9.20 min. of this video as if you contradicting what -S- is.
-S- is a behaviour of a system unpredictable by the behaviour of it's parts taken separately, : So this statement is not true any more?? Why is -S- so confusing and so inconsistent, why only so narrow group of people understand this easily teachable subject. PERHAPS, -S- appears to be more of a wishful thinking than a valid curriculum material.
Frank, There have been a few passionate explorers of Buckminster Fuller's Synergetics like Joe Clinton. Now we have some critics. Which is good and healthy. But because there have been too few explorers and too few critics, the kinks in our understanding of Synergetics have not yet sorted themselves out. And I, like you, think that Synergetics, requires some filling in of gaps and probably even the removal of several flaws. I am confident however that it can be built into a science.
SynergeticsCollab 1 year ago
So synergetics is not a study of a behaviour of a system unpredicted by the behaviour of it's parts taken separately? Is the premis of synergetics changing again?
ElusiveCube 1 year ago
It seams in the lapse time 9.20 min. of this video as if you contradicting what -S- is.
-S- is a behaviour of a system unpredictable by the behaviour of it's parts taken separately, : So this statement is not true any more?? Why is -S- so confusing and so inconsistent, why only so narrow group of people understand this easily teachable subject. PERHAPS, -S- appears to be more of a wishful thinking than a valid curriculum material.
ElusiveCube 1 year ago