Yeah, your video is right. Aisha's own testimony in an authentic hadith is wrong.
What you have to remind the viewers here is that YOUR REJECTION OF THE AUTHENTIC HADITH IS HERETICAL.
Similarly, your citation of surah 4 aya 6 is in regard to orphans. Was Aisha an orphan? Nope.
And if we were to take your citation of Alqaramaty seriously we would be posed with a problem - how was Aisha FIVE YEARS OLDER than her father Abu Bakr?
1. The Hadith is unauthentic because it was invented 200 years after the death of prophet Muhammed.
2. I do not care whether my rejection of the Hadiths is heretical or not. I only go with the truth. The truth is that Hadiths and Sira are later inventions that came 150-200 years after the death of prophet Muhammed. This is proved by Muslim and even non-Muslim scholars.
3. 4:6 says o test the orphans until they reach "Nikah". Nikah is the word for marriage in the Quran. Thus 4:6 means to test them until they reach a marriageable age. So when they Quran says "inkaho" (The verb form of Nikah) it means to marry only hen we reach a marriageable age. Thus Muslims can only marry when they reach a marriageable age. Thus the story about Aysha being 9 year old is fake.
1. Your claim that it was 'invented' 200 years later is the minority school ignoring the transmission of the hadith.
Similarly, to claim that the Sira is unreliable has no real basis. Just because we do not possess the originals of Ibn Ishaqs contemporary work, doesn't mean that the later Siras, harmonising the hadith, are wrong.
We do not possess the original Qur'anic manuscripts but copies of a copy. By your treatment of the Sira and ahadith - it is just as likely to be corrupt.
1. Whether it is the minority school or the majority school does not matter. What matters is the truth. The truth is that the Hadiths are a later invention, somewhere between 150-200 years after the death of Muhammed.
2. "Transmission" of the Hadith is also a later invention. They were invented to make the Hadiths look "reliable".
3. The Sira is unreliable not because we do not have the originals, but because they are also a later invention somewhere 150 years after he death of Muhammed.
4. We have Quranic manuscripts that date to at most 15 years after the death of Muhammed. Sira and Hadiths date at least 150 years after the death of Muhammed. There is no comparison here.
What you have to understand is that what I am telling you here is not something I pulled off the air. It is the consensus of modern Muslim and even non-Muslim scholars.
2. You have not destroyed the claim. You have only destroyed the claim for yourself and the minority of little 'quranics' out there holding onto liberal Muslim scholarly work to avoid facing the abhorrent acts of your prophet.
I have destroyed the claim for all Muslims, Quranists, Sunnis, Shias etc... Anyway, any Muslim, whether Sunni, Shia or whatever will tell you that if a Hadith contradicts the Quran, then that Hadith must be fake. I have shown that marrying 9 year old is prohibited by the Quran, hence it could not have been done by Muhammed. I have also shown you that it is the consensus of the Muslim, and even non-Muslim, modern scholarly community that Sira and Hadiths are a very later invention.
Any Muslim will tell you that if a Hadith contradicts the Quran, then that Hadith is 100% fake.
Since Islam prohibits pedophilia, then prophet Muhammed was not a pedophile and did not marry Aysha when she was 9 year old.
"Isnad" has been refuted countless times by Muslim and non-Muslim scholars. Read for Dr. Ahmed Sobhy Mansour on the so called "Isnad". It's a fabrication invented 200 years after the death of Muhammed.
Even Sunnis admit that 99$ of Isnad is based on Ahad (Unreliable).
You and your likes are soundly debunked in this video. Go learn about Islam from authentic translations of the Quran then come back with a decent rebuttal.
Isnad is a "RELIABLE CHAIN" of narrations. And the hadith that CLEARLY STATE muhammad violated a LITTLE GIRL AGED ONLY 9 YEARS has a "RELIABLE CHAIN" of narrations.
MUHAMMAD IS BY CLINICAL DEFINITION A "PEDEOPHILE"
Isnad is not a reliable chain of narrations. Only Sunnis and Shias will tell you this. Muslims scholars and even non-Muslim scholars have proved that this "RELIABLE CHAIN" of narrations was invented 200 years after the death of Muhammed. What even proves this more is that most of these "narrations" contradict even the basic teaching of the Quran, hence they could not have been uttered by Muhammed.
Muhammed is by a clinical definition a moral teacher, and you by clinical definition are an idiot.
"And please tell me which of the narrations that PROVE muhammads PEDOPHILLIA are ultimately unreliable. Please quote me books and numbers if you could?
Thanks"
I suggest you read for Dr. Ahmed Sobhy Mansour. He is an expert on this.
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the most HONEST, RIGHTEOUS, PIOUS, KIND, SINCERE, HANDSOME, HUMBLE, JUST, SMART, MERCIFUL, AND HONOURABLE PERSON AND CREATION OF ALLAH.
People who are openly against this religion are not 'bigots', they are often educated people who see sense, unlike people who believe in Islam. Normal people who arn't deluded by made up religion need to stand up against Islam, it's taking over the world and even there laws are coming to the UK be afraid people.
This has to be the worst rebuttal I have ever seen.
islamoscope 3 years ago
Yea, sure. That's why no Christian can refute it!
You are a gem!
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
It looks like someone is very selective in which of my comments they approve, doesn't it?
islamoscope 3 years ago
I approve any comment that is not rude. I have approved all of you comments so far. I am not on YouTube 24 hours you know.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
Yeah, your video is right. Aisha's own testimony in an authentic hadith is wrong.
What you have to remind the viewers here is that YOUR REJECTION OF THE AUTHENTIC HADITH IS HERETICAL.
Similarly, your citation of surah 4 aya 6 is in regard to orphans. Was Aisha an orphan? Nope.
And if we were to take your citation of Alqaramaty seriously we would be posed with a problem - how was Aisha FIVE YEARS OLDER than her father Abu Bakr?
Poor little ignorant Muslim.
islamoscope 3 years ago
1. The Hadith is unauthentic because it was invented 200 years after the death of prophet Muhammed.
2. I do not care whether my rejection of the Hadiths is heretical or not. I only go with the truth. The truth is that Hadiths and Sira are later inventions that came 150-200 years after the death of prophet Muhammed. This is proved by Muslim and even non-Muslim scholars.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
3. 4:6 says o test the orphans until they reach "Nikah". Nikah is the word for marriage in the Quran. Thus 4:6 means to test them until they reach a marriageable age. So when they Quran says "inkaho" (The verb form of Nikah) it means to marry only hen we reach a marriageable age. Thus Muslims can only marry when they reach a marriageable age. Thus the story about Aysha being 9 year old is fake.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
4. Aysha was not 5 years older than her father obviously. The age of Abu Bakr in the Hadiths and Sira is fake, since they were later inventions.
5. you are the poor little ignorant and arrogant Christians. You have been served!
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
1. Your claim that it was 'invented' 200 years later is the minority school ignoring the transmission of the hadith.
Similarly, to claim that the Sira is unreliable has no real basis. Just because we do not possess the originals of Ibn Ishaqs contemporary work, doesn't mean that the later Siras, harmonising the hadith, are wrong.
We do not possess the original Qur'anic manuscripts but copies of a copy. By your treatment of the Sira and ahadith - it is just as likely to be corrupt.
islamoscope 3 years ago
1. Whether it is the minority school or the majority school does not matter. What matters is the truth. The truth is that the Hadiths are a later invention, somewhere between 150-200 years after the death of Muhammed.
2. "Transmission" of the Hadith is also a later invention. They were invented to make the Hadiths look "reliable".
3. The Sira is unreliable not because we do not have the originals, but because they are also a later invention somewhere 150 years after he death of Muhammed.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
4. We have Quranic manuscripts that date to at most 15 years after the death of Muhammed. Sira and Hadiths date at least 150 years after the death of Muhammed. There is no comparison here.
What you have to understand is that what I am telling you here is not something I pulled off the air. It is the consensus of modern Muslim and even non-Muslim scholars.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
2. You have not destroyed the claim. You have only destroyed the claim for yourself and the minority of little 'quranics' out there holding onto liberal Muslim scholarly work to avoid facing the abhorrent acts of your prophet.
islamoscope 3 years ago
I have destroyed the claim for all Muslims, Quranists, Sunnis, Shias etc... Anyway, any Muslim, whether Sunni, Shia or whatever will tell you that if a Hadith contradicts the Quran, then that Hadith must be fake. I have shown that marrying 9 year old is prohibited by the Quran, hence it could not have been done by Muhammed. I have also shown you that it is the consensus of the Muslim, and even non-Muslim, modern scholarly community that Sira and Hadiths are a very later invention.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
I here challenge you to prove one "abhorrent" act of prophet Muhammed from the Quran!
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
please send this video to all those bastards claiming Him to be Paedophile
uzee000 3 years ago
Muhammad is by CLINICAL DEFINITION a
PEDOPHILE!
nemisis123456 3 years ago
You are by CLINICAL DEFINITION an
IDIOT!
Watch this video again you blind. It debunks people like you.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
It debunks nothing of the sort im afaid.
LEARN about islam.
LEARN about ISNAD!
LEARN about the CLINICAL DEFINITION of pedophillia and then come back with a decent rebuttal.
Thanks.
nemisis123456 3 years ago
You are so ignorant it is frightening.
Any Muslim will tell you that if a Hadith contradicts the Quran, then that Hadith is 100% fake.
Since Islam prohibits pedophilia, then prophet Muhammed was not a pedophile and did not marry Aysha when she was 9 year old.
"Isnad" has been refuted countless times by Muslim and non-Muslim scholars. Read for Dr. Ahmed Sobhy Mansour on the so called "Isnad". It's a fabrication invented 200 years after the death of Muhammed.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
Even Sunnis admit that 99$ of Isnad is based on Ahad (Unreliable).
You and your likes are soundly debunked in this video. Go learn about Islam from authentic translations of the Quran then come back with a decent rebuttal.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
By the way, it is your "god" who was a pedophile, since he fucked Mary when she was 12 year old.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
"Even Sunnis admit that 99$ of Isnad is based on Ahad (Unreliable)."
In that case then you must tell your sunni friends to REJECT SHARIAH LAW as it CONSTITUTED with the ACCEPTANCE of such VILE hadith!
Tell me does shariah law ALLOW a muslim man to take a 9 YEAR OLD CHILD for a wife?
I await your ANSWER on this!
Cheers
nemisis123456 3 years ago
"In that case then you must tell your sunni friends to REJECT SHARIAH LAW as it CONSTITUTED with the ACCEPTANCE of such VILE hadith!"
Sharia is supposedly based on Islamic laws. Islamic laws = Quran. Hadiths are unauthentic.
"Tell me does shariah law ALLOW a muslim man to take a 9 YEAR OLD CHILD for a wife?
I await your ANSWER on this!
Cheers"
No.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
Isnad is a "RELIABLE CHAIN" of narrations. And the hadith that CLEARLY STATE muhammad violated a LITTLE GIRL AGED ONLY 9 YEARS has a "RELIABLE CHAIN" of narrations.
MUHAMMAD IS BY CLINICAL DEFINITION A "PEDEOPHILE"
nemisis123456 3 years ago
Isnad is not a reliable chain of narrations. Only Sunnis and Shias will tell you this. Muslims scholars and even non-Muslim scholars have proved that this "RELIABLE CHAIN" of narrations was invented 200 years after the death of Muhammed. What even proves this more is that most of these "narrations" contradict even the basic teaching of the Quran, hence they could not have been uttered by Muhammed.
Muhammed is by a clinical definition a moral teacher, and you by clinical definition are an idiot.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
If your not a sunni or even a shia then what SECT of islam do you belong to?
And please tell me which of the narrations that PROVE muhammads PEDOPHILLIA are ultimately unreliable. Please quote me books and numbers if you could?
Thanks
nemisis123456 3 years ago
I am a Muslim who follows the Quran alone.
"And please tell me which of the narrations that PROVE muhammads PEDOPHILLIA are ultimately unreliable. Please quote me books and numbers if you could?
Thanks"
I suggest you read for Dr. Ahmed Sobhy Mansour. He is an expert on this.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
Islam DOESNT prohibit pedophillia at all!
Islam DOESNT RECOGNISE pedophillia if the poor VICTIM (ie a LITTLE GIRL!) is MARRIED!
The way in which SHAIAH LAW is constituted ALLOWS FOR ISNTITUTIONALISED PEDOPHILLIA!
FACT!
nemisis123456 3 years ago 2
Islam prohibits pedophilia. Please watch this watch?v=Kqg4Tm3B6sk&feature=channel_page
"Islam DOESNT RECOGNISE pedophillia if the poor VICTIM (ie a LITTLE GIRL!) is MARRIED!"
Where does it say so in the Quran? Nowhere.
"The way in which SHAIAH LAW is constituted ALLOWS FOR ISNTITUTIONALISED PEDOPHILLIA!
FACT!"
No, it is not. If by Sharia you mean Islamic laws, then no. The Quran clearly prohibits pedophilia.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
Don't listen to the lies propagated to you.
Let me tell you the TRUTH:
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the most HONEST, RIGHTEOUS, PIOUS, KIND, SINCERE, HANDSOME, HUMBLE, JUST, SMART, MERCIFUL, AND HONOURABLE PERSON AND CREATION OF ALLAH.
CHECK OUT MY VIDEO REGARDING THIS ISSUE!
?v=tXaw9UZlK_I
xtremeownage2 3 years ago
People who are openly against this religion are not 'bigots', they are often educated people who see sense, unlike people who believe in Islam. Normal people who arn't deluded by made up religion need to stand up against Islam, it's taking over the world and even there laws are coming to the UK be afraid people.
GazOred 3 years ago
People who are openly against this religion are at best ignorants, at worst bigots. Prove that Islam is not a sensible religion or stay silent.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
wow i thought she was 16? never knew she was 46 O_O
undeadsfan250 3 years ago
interesting vid.... you say its a myth, but many Muslim clerics defend Mohamed marrying a child. are all the muslim clerics wrong?
Gilgamesh387 3 years ago
Yes they are wrong, because they resort to unauthentic records that were authored 200 years after the death of Muhammed.
By the way, not all Muslim clerics believe Muhammed married a Aysha at such a young age.
ExChristian2716 3 years ago
yes they also worng about sucide bombing it completey agenst quran
dont follow priests or clerics follow the holy books
undeadsfan250 3 years ago
Great video keep up the good work
Kite207 3 years ago 2
Great vid something to considers, personally I havent read any of these hadith thingys.
SoraniKurdistan 3 years ago 2