@sk8pn well sure, in large numbers like army vs army. but in this "situation" (and if it were army vs. army for these two warriors), it should have at the very least been much closer in numbers. these testers take a lot of these weapons at face value and don't fully test all they are capable of. because, if it were based on military strength of each side, the chinese would have won in that period, hands down. but, again, as individual warriors, it should have at least been much closer.
theres some bs stuff on both sides of this fight.. musketters using grenades?? and ming warrior with his lame booby trap sword?? the ming warrior should also have grenades since FUCKING CHINA INVENTED GUNPOWDER shit!
@perfecttrunks2000 i was referring tot he comment the frenchman made in the end of the episode. hitler ran down easily through their invisible wall during WWII.
@metalhead4985 If you are talking about Asia like China and Japan then Rajput were not Asian they were Indian. And the samuria lost to the spartan. The only other Asian that won as Shoulin monks but other than that the Asians mostly lose in season 2. Hopefully if they put Genghis Khan in season 3 then he might have better mongol weapons to fight up against and then maybe he might but I'm have a 63% guess that he might loss to a more advance soldier.
Anyone else notice that almost every single Ming warrior was killed by the same Musketeer? Except for the first guy, all the Ming were killed by the one guy.
@KatakiDoragon Yes, The "lead" Musketeer, killed 3 out of 5 of the Ming's, the one who killed the first, incapacitated another, who was finished off by another.and that grenade kill was a double team effort lol...all that means is the leader was pimp ^_^
i think that people have to realize that the out comes are not based on army vs. army, but it is based on a one on one prediction. Also it has to do with probability, Personally, I think the Ming have the better advantage if you put a legion on people against a group of two hundred. Also when it comes to their swordsmanship/martial arts ability on a one one basis (excluding firearms), it's the Ming all the way.
at the end, at least xavier had something positive to say about the ming warrior. but philip dang? whiner much? btw, the ming warrior looks like manny pacquiao.
Only 2 chinese warriors left that they could possibly use; the PLA and the Triads. The French Knight got the shit kicked out of him but the Musketeer made up for THAT.
@Volcanoran3 May I ask what the PLA is? And do the Tongs count as a Chinese gang, or were they only founded by Chinese railroad work gangs after they came to America and not before? :?
ok that is kind of embarrassing to lose to croissant munching tea-drinking frenchies. guess technology (in this case the steel cuirass) is the deciding factor just about all the time.
dont take my stereotype of frenchies too seriously, though, i still think that throughout history the french were pretty tough and skilled militarily (besides the maginot line cough cough)
Here's a good one for season 3: Croatian HDZ from the Croatian War vs. the Algerian FMN from the Algerian War of Independence. Both were able to win independence against much stronger ethnic groups (Serbs for Croatians, French for Algerians), and is actually contemporary modern history that won't be subjected to possible revisionist crap.
I have alot of respect for the Ming warriors I really do. But sometimes defence is the best offence. Like the Maori vs the shaolin monk from season one.
If they were to pit up the last winners against this years winners (at least thus far that's been aired) I'd like to see these fights: William Wallace vs Vlad The Impaler (or Atilla the Hun)
Apache vs. Zande Warrior (or Commache or Mongol)
Pirate vs Mustketeer (squad on squad to be fair)
Jesse James gang vs The Mafia
Spartan vs Rajput warrior
Spetznaz vs Waffen SS (or Navy SEALS or Israeli Commandos or SWAT or Somali Pirates)
@MKnut207 gladiator vs. viking doesn't seem fair 2 me. there were other matchups like samurai vs viking & celt vs immortal which were not fair in my opinion coz babarians using brute force were pitted against traind precision killers who had the best of technology @ their disposal. so i think a viking shud b made to face off another barbarian like celt or maori & gladiator against say, a knight. matchups in my opinion must be like soldier vs soldier & brute force vs brute force.
@metalhead4985 Gladiators were not barbarians, they were trained showmen just like moder wrestlers if modern wrestlers were allowed to kill each other.
u misinterpreted that comment my friend. yes i know that gladiators were highly trained killing machines. i'm trying 2 say that a gladiator must be pitted against an equally well trained opponent such as a knight instead of a viking as suggested by MKnut207.
@metalhead4985 Sorry but I think it was you who didin't get me: Gladiators weren't meant to kill each other and were not very good at it, there is only one massacre registered in history and it was gladiators murdering untrained slaves.
They were a multimillionaire investment for their owners, they weren't going to let them kill each other all the time, just in very special events did champions fight to the death.
In short: Gladiators are the least murderous of fighters, and weren't warriors.
@metalhead4985 True, but since every fighter this season only gets four weapons, the IRA would only have their AR15 as a gun. And as we saw with Al Capone, one gun equals an instant defeat; they've gotta lose that useless fucking slingshot D:
@darkemoghost I think they may end up putting up the Israeli Commando or Navy SEALs against Spetsnez which ever one wins and I think Israeli Commando and Navy SEALs could take the Spetsnez. Shaolin monk vs Persian? Persian regardless the persian has good weapons and armor.
Pirate vs Musketeer is my favorite suggestion of your, I thought of that a couple hours ago. Musket vs Blunderbuss, but it would be weird seeing grenade on grenade and wheel lock pistol vs wheel lock pistol.
@MrGodTube True. Who do you think would win between the fights I suggested? The top 3 fights I'd love to see is William Wallace vs Vlad the Impaler (or Atilla The Hun), Spetznaz against either the Navy SEALs or Israeli Commandos, and finally the Spartan against the Rajput warrior or Apache vs Zande Warrior. Sorry, the last one was tied for me. I don't think the CIA could fairly be put up against the other fighters, at least not that I can think of thus far.
@darkemoghost I have to say Vlad would probably end up beating Atila even though he has a composite bow I would like to see it against vlads chainmail. They probably will put vlad vs attila they both have good weapons and armor.
Zande beats apache cause zandes weapons are amazing.
@darkemoghost Spartan vs Rajput, Spartan Hand's down; Rajput only has chainmail armor: that doesn't stand up to piercing weapons and that's all the Spartan uses.
Jesse James vs the Mafia, I'd have to say Jesse James; as proven in his fight against Al Capone, Firepower isn't all it takes. Besides, James' guns have much greater range than the Tommygun or Sawn-Off Shotgun.
@Volcanoran3 Who would you say William Wallace would probably do better in a fight against, Vlad The Impaler or Atilla the Hun? Cause every weapon Wallace had kicked ass in my opinion besides the ball and chain, at least as far as it being a long range weapon.
@415erboy That handcannon got 74 kills against Sun Tzu; out of 1000 battles, that's pathetic, and Sun Tzu had leather armor while Wallace has Chainmail. At longrange, Vlad may have an advantage, but once Wallace gets up close, there's no a soul that could defeat him.
@Volcanoran3 but chail mail cant even stop an arrow so a leadball is outta da question even if da killage cant slice chainmail vlad still got da halberd which is still a longer reach den the claymore an vlad got chainmail to
@415erboy True. But Wallace has a shield, and even though it was made of wood and packed with hardened leather. so it helps to have something. Plus it's got the spike on it, so that would be useful. I think that the fight probably would come down to Wallace's Claymore against Vlad's sword. Sorry, I can't remember the name...
@MrGodTube You raise a good point; Atilla would probably be a great opponent for Vlad; psycho against psycho. However, Vlad had a Handcannon; he doesn't qualify as an Ancient Warrior and as such he won't see Atilla on the battlefield.
And I'd have to agree there; here's how it'd go; the Zande Kpinga against Tomahawk, Boto Bow against Apache Bow, Knife vs Makraka and War Club vs Makrigga. The Zande would lose the edge with his bow, but his other three weapons, KICK ASS.
While they are just as good at combat, we have to admit, the Ming Dynasty were very skilled wall builders. The work on the Great Wall of China was very cool.
@fongdaihap The Rapier was not meant to take a direct hit; it was made to parry the thick and heavy English swords (like how he parried the dao we saw in the match) and deliver a killing blow while the enemy is wondering "How in the hell is this piece of steel holding off my attack?!" Or, if not a killing blow with Rapier, lead up with a stab from the Main Gauche to the face, neck, heart, or guts.
This part of the show is just a reenactment of what possibly would happen if the 2 ever faced off, and if you are putting the Rapier up against the Dao by itself the Dao would possibly have won but it didn't cause of the combo the Rapier had with the Main Gauche. With that 2 blades is better than 1. Well with thing about the show hating Asain is wrong cause had plenty of asian win there battles. For exmple: "Samurai vs Viking" (Samurai Won) "Shaolin Monk vs Māori Warrior" (Shaolin Monk Won).
@fongdaihap a "real sword"????? a sword is defined as a a cutting or thrusting weapon that has a long metal blade and a hilt with a hand guard. So in the category of sword i think the rapier qualifies majorly, also the rapier can easily get through ribs and hit major muscles and organs, so you're more than welcome to get "poked" by a rapier and see how it feels.
begining of fight, the ming guy just stands in open to get shot...near end there were 2 mins left, and thy decide to fight the last musketeer 1 on 1 .....really now? ....deadliest warrior really hates the asians dont thy
@ShawdowCreeper That was the worst insult ever, mostly in large part due to your inability to spell "croissant". (Btw i'm not french i just found your fanboy rage fail comical)
@xRKOx4life yo im chinese and I and I was offended when the french guy said the ming warrior should go back to china and build walls IM NOT A FANBOY!!!
@ShawdowCreeper Dude there's nothing wrong with being French. Lol calling someone a french fucker has basically no effect, considering they say the same about you guys. I'm part French and even I didn't take that in offense XD
@greensucksbluerules Also it was meant to exploit weaknesses in steel armor, which the Mings didn't have, The Dao is great, a head lopper, I;m sure that's where it got it's kills from, But they never showed how effective it was on Musketeer armor, probably not at all.
i'm not disapointed that the musketeer won but my question is why would 2 soldiers go 1 v 1 when they can go 2 on 1. Honor wasn't that big of a thing for ming warriors. And even if they did why did the first ming swordsman didn't immediately go for a kill when the flintlock pistol misfired and why didn't the second ming warrior not use his high ground to his advantage.
I'm calling bullshit on this result.
fuck the french.
pricelesspistola321 1 year ago
@pricelesspistola321 french use to bee prety strong u know back in napoleons day
sk8pn 1 year ago
@sk8pn well sure, in large numbers like army vs army. but in this "situation" (and if it were army vs. army for these two warriors), it should have at the very least been much closer in numbers. these testers take a lot of these weapons at face value and don't fully test all they are capable of. because, if it were based on military strength of each side, the chinese would have won in that period, hands down. but, again, as individual warriors, it should have at least been much closer.
pricelesspistola321 1 year ago
CHARGE!!!!!....*BOOM CHEST SHOT*..Man down
silentpawn 1 year ago
@greensucksbluerules Strange...
Grisshnaak 1 year ago
the biggest wrong turn was the fact that the muskets actually hit both targets, which never would happen in real life.
saberswing 1 year ago
The French guy wasn't being racist. The Ming dynasty built the Great Wall. I think thats what he was referring to
CookieMMMonster 1 year ago
im suprised the french even fought, they usually surrender!
NathanSears121 1 year ago
lol they would just shoot them without any fight at all...
mazaisvilijs 1 year ago
at 1:58 looks like he's masturbating lol
d53njac 1 year ago
@d53njac lol i know
legh101 1 year ago
theres some bs stuff on both sides of this fight.. musketters using grenades?? and ming warrior with his lame booby trap sword?? the ming warrior should also have grenades since FUCKING CHINA INVENTED GUNPOWDER shit!
perfecttrunks2000 1 year ago
@perfecttrunks2000 the mine got 399 kills. The gernade didn't even hit 100.
CookieMMMonster 1 year ago
@perfecttrunks2000 whoops I meant 199 ma bad.
CookieMMMonster 1 year ago
2:00
ROFL!!!
Extremehalofan14 1 year ago
okay, muskets are not that accurate, he has to be a lucky ass person to pull off those shots.
metalgear418 1 year ago
Build walls? Weren't the French good at building an invisible one?
pcekeep 1 year ago
@pcekeep i dont understand what ru alluding to
perfecttrunks2000 1 year ago
@perfecttrunks2000 i was referring tot he comment the frenchman made in the end of the episode. hitler ran down easily through their invisible wall during WWII.
pcekeep 1 year ago
LOL it's funny how the musketeer already has the best weapons at the time and all the money. Yet he has to pull that shitty dao out of the ground.
CookieMMMonster 1 year ago
@CookieMMMonster it is funny they r comparing 13-14th century ming warriors with the much later musketeers....
canadianfirzen 1 year ago
That french guy sounded a little racist at the end haha
alexbatey3 1 year ago 5
lmao I laughed so hard when that french guy said they should go build walls they're very good at it
arlington925 1 year ago 5
that french guy owened the whole race of asians lo0loololololol
Zon3d0ut 1 year ago
how come when ever t's an asian VS a white dude the asians always lose?
like really? >___>
lchigoe 1 year ago
@lchigoe because you touch yourself at night
Zon3d0ut 1 year ago
@lchigoe asian fot white dude in season one( samurai vs viking) an samurai won
415erboy 1 year ago
@lchigoe asians don't lose always. remember roman centurian vs rajput? viking vs samurai?
metalhead4985 1 year ago
@metalhead4985
oh i didn't see those.. LOL. i saw the viet cong one
and this.
lchigoe 1 year ago
@metalhead4985 If you are talking about Asia like China and Japan then Rajput were not Asian they were Indian. And the samuria lost to the spartan. The only other Asian that won as Shoulin monks but other than that the Asians mostly lose in season 2. Hopefully if they put Genghis Khan in season 3 then he might have better mongol weapons to fight up against and then maybe he might but I'm have a 63% guess that he might loss to a more advance soldier.
deathstar628 1 year ago
@deathstar628 Um, last time I checked, India was in Asia.
Pwnyaall9000 1 year ago
@lchigoe no, there was attila vs alexander, samurai vs viking
bludeborne 1 year ago
2:34 ....showoff..
MetalPersian 1 year ago
The French can't beat shit gtfo this is bullshit lol
joshua5107 1 year ago
This a fucking retarded
alexandermac14 1 year ago
Anyone else notice that almost every single Ming warrior was killed by the same Musketeer? Except for the first guy, all the Ming were killed by the one guy.
He stabbed the second one to die.
Threw the grenade that killed the third one.
And outduelled the fourth and fifth ones.
KatakiDoragon 1 year ago
@KatakiDoragon Yes, The "lead" Musketeer, killed 3 out of 5 of the Ming's, the one who killed the first, incapacitated another, who was finished off by another.and that grenade kill was a double team effort lol...all that means is the leader was pimp ^_^
Ivodrone881 1 year ago
@Ivodrone881 Yeah he was, bet he get mad Bitchs! This was a cool episode I wonder what the Musketeer would do against Vlad or the Pirate.
FunkMastaMegaFlex 1 year ago
i think that people have to realize that the out comes are not based on army vs. army, but it is based on a one on one prediction. Also it has to do with probability, Personally, I think the Ming have the better advantage if you put a legion on people against a group of two hundred. Also when it comes to their swordsmanship/martial arts ability on a one one basis (excluding firearms), it's the Ming all the way.
Condemned777 1 year ago
does anyone else think when some of the muskets get injured or die
they sound like the stick guys dieing in the defend your castle game?
ZoMg801 1 year ago
I wish Deadliest Warrior could have East vs. East (Soviets vs. China or Ming vs. Samurai). That would be epic.
AzNgiftedkid 1 year ago
at the end, at least xavier had something positive to say about the ming warrior. but philip dang? whiner much? btw, the ming warrior looks like manny pacquiao.
101djwess1 1 year ago
i wanna see ming vs samurai
thebestanthe3rd 1 year ago
@thebestanthe3rd Samurai would win; he has better armor.
Volcanoran3 1 year ago
LMAO @ the first kill the guys all freakin happy hes goin to fight :D then bam D: he dead lol
X4BadBlood4X 1 year ago
it should have been ceaser vs vlad
8xaos 1 year ago
Only 2 chinese warriors left that they could possibly use; the PLA and the Triads. The French Knight got the shit kicked out of him but the Musketeer made up for THAT.
Volcanoran3 1 year ago
@Volcanoran3 May I ask what the PLA is? And do the Tongs count as a Chinese gang, or were they only founded by Chinese railroad work gangs after they came to America and not before? :?
NodDisciple1 1 year ago
@NodDisciple1 People's Liberation Army, China's Special Forces. And I know nothing about the Tongs.
Volcanoran3 1 year ago
Comment removed
NodDisciple1 1 year ago
@Volcanoran3 Oh, and you forgot the Korean Hwarang. :X
NodDisciple1 1 year ago
ok that is kind of embarrassing to lose to croissant munching tea-drinking frenchies. guess technology (in this case the steel cuirass) is the deciding factor just about all the time.
dont take my stereotype of frenchies too seriously, though, i still think that throughout history the french were pretty tough and skilled militarily (besides the maginot line cough cough)
raisukeuzarachi 1 year ago
Here's a good one for season 3: Croatian HDZ from the Croatian War vs. the Algerian FMN from the Algerian War of Independence. Both were able to win independence against much stronger ethnic groups (Serbs for Croatians, French for Algerians), and is actually contemporary modern history that won't be subjected to possible revisionist crap.
jrsub3 1 year ago
Thumbs up if you want the pirates from season 1 to fight the winner of this match up.
MKvsDCMan 1 year ago
:39 LOL YEAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
french musketeer: STFU NOOB
*boom*
lol
rotomfan 1 year ago 2
well one major advantage was armor. take that away and the ming would have won
Berserk100 1 year ago
I have alot of respect for the Ming warriors I really do. But sometimes defence is the best offence. Like the Maori vs the shaolin monk from season one.
dahak2006 1 year ago
If they were to pit up the last winners against this years winners (at least thus far that's been aired) I'd like to see these fights: William Wallace vs Vlad The Impaler (or Atilla the Hun)
Apache vs. Zande Warrior (or Commache or Mongol)
Pirate vs Mustketeer (squad on squad to be fair)
Jesse James gang vs The Mafia
Spartan vs Rajput warrior
Spetznaz vs Waffen SS (or Navy SEALS or Israeli Commandos or SWAT or Somali Pirates)
Shaolin Monk vs Persian Immortal
Anybody else got ideas?
darkemoghost 1 year ago
@darkemoghost
interesting match ups.but,i think the defeated warriors should also be given a 2nd chance. for example, celt vs maori GSG9 vs green beret,
medellin cartel vs yakuza.
metalhead4985 1 year ago
@metalhead4985 i agree with you 100% on that, but sadly i don't think they're gonna do that, but it would be AWESOME to see gladiator vs. viking.
MKnut207 1 year ago
@MKnut207 gladiator vs. viking doesn't seem fair 2 me. there were other matchups like samurai vs viking & celt vs immortal which were not fair in my opinion coz babarians using brute force were pitted against traind precision killers who had the best of technology @ their disposal. so i think a viking shud b made to face off another barbarian like celt or maori & gladiator against say, a knight. matchups in my opinion must be like soldier vs soldier & brute force vs brute force.
metalhead4985 1 year ago
@metalhead4985 Gladiators were not barbarians, they were trained showmen just like moder wrestlers if modern wrestlers were allowed to kill each other.
RayneRockstar 1 year ago
@RayneRockstar
u misinterpreted that comment my friend. yes i know that gladiators were highly trained killing machines. i'm trying 2 say that a gladiator must be pitted against an equally well trained opponent such as a knight instead of a viking as suggested by MKnut207.
metalhead4985 1 year ago
@metalhead4985 Sorry but I think it was you who didin't get me: Gladiators weren't meant to kill each other and were not very good at it, there is only one massacre registered in history and it was gladiators murdering untrained slaves.
They were a multimillionaire investment for their owners, they weren't going to let them kill each other all the time, just in very special events did champions fight to the death.
In short: Gladiators are the least murderous of fighters, and weren't warriors.
RayneRockstar 1 year ago
@RayneRockstar
ok. thank u very much 4 the info.
metalhead4985 1 year ago
@metalhead4985
good ideas. How about the Samurai vs the Rajput and the IRA vs the Somali Pirates?
darkemoghost 1 year ago
@darkemoghost IRA would probably take that one and the Rajput would probably take that one to
MrGodTube 1 year ago
@darkemoghost samurai vs rajput would be a thriller. IRA vs somali pirates, i think IRA will win bcoz of their better knowledge of explosives.
metalhead4985 1 year ago
@metalhead4985 True, but since every fighter this season only gets four weapons, the IRA would only have their AR15 as a gun. And as we saw with Al Capone, one gun equals an instant defeat; they've gotta lose that useless fucking slingshot D:
Volcanoran3 1 year ago
@Volcanoran3
but the IRA have the flamethrower too & the flamethrower won the battle for the Nazis against Vietcong.
metalhead4985 1 year ago
@metalhead4985 Meddellin Cartel has a slight edge in my opinion, Celt would probably take that against Maori
MrGodTube 1 year ago
@darkemoghost Rajput vs Shaolin Monks
Only because I want to see which one is better Original Indian Kung Fu or Chinese modified Kung Fu
randomikey5678 1 year ago
@darkemoghost I think they may end up putting up the Israeli Commando or Navy SEALs against Spetsnez which ever one wins and I think Israeli Commando and Navy SEALs could take the Spetsnez. Shaolin monk vs Persian? Persian regardless the persian has good weapons and armor.
Pirate vs Musketeer is my favorite suggestion of your, I thought of that a couple hours ago. Musket vs Blunderbuss, but it would be weird seeing grenade on grenade and wheel lock pistol vs wheel lock pistol.
MrGodTube 1 year ago
@MrGodTube True. Who do you think would win between the fights I suggested? The top 3 fights I'd love to see is William Wallace vs Vlad the Impaler (or Atilla The Hun), Spetznaz against either the Navy SEALs or Israeli Commandos, and finally the Spartan against the Rajput warrior or Apache vs Zande Warrior. Sorry, the last one was tied for me. I don't think the CIA could fairly be put up against the other fighters, at least not that I can think of thus far.
darkemoghost 1 year ago
@darkemoghost I have to say Vlad would probably end up beating Atila even though he has a composite bow I would like to see it against vlads chainmail. They probably will put vlad vs attila they both have good weapons and armor.
Zande beats apache cause zandes weapons are amazing.
MrGodTube 1 year ago
@MrGodTube Ok. Who do you think would win between the Spartan and Rajput, and between the Jesse James' Gang vs The Maifa?
darkemoghost 1 year ago
@darkemoghost I'd give it to the Spartan, since no one could get through that shield.
nagaking07 1 year ago
@darkemoghost Spartan vs Rajput, Spartan Hand's down; Rajput only has chainmail armor: that doesn't stand up to piercing weapons and that's all the Spartan uses.
Jesse James vs the Mafia, I'd have to say Jesse James; as proven in his fight against Al Capone, Firepower isn't all it takes. Besides, James' guns have much greater range than the Tommygun or Sawn-Off Shotgun.
Volcanoran3 1 year ago
@Volcanoran3 Who would you say William Wallace would probably do better in a fight against, Vlad The Impaler or Atilla the Hun? Cause every weapon Wallace had kicked ass in my opinion besides the ball and chain, at least as far as it being a long range weapon.
darkemoghost 1 year ago
@darkemoghost A good opponent for Wallace? Probably would be Vlad the Impaler. Both are incredible fighters.
Volcanoran3 1 year ago
@Volcanoran3 but vlad has gun powder tho remember das a kill
415erboy 1 year ago
@415erboy That handcannon got 74 kills against Sun Tzu; out of 1000 battles, that's pathetic, and Sun Tzu had leather armor while Wallace has Chainmail. At longrange, Vlad may have an advantage, but once Wallace gets up close, there's no a soul that could defeat him.
Volcanoran3 1 year ago
@Volcanoran3 but chail mail cant even stop an arrow so a leadball is outta da question even if da killage cant slice chainmail vlad still got da halberd which is still a longer reach den the claymore an vlad got chainmail to
415erboy 1 year ago
@415erboy True. But Wallace has a shield, and even though it was made of wood and packed with hardened leather. so it helps to have something. Plus it's got the spike on it, so that would be useful. I think that the fight probably would come down to Wallace's Claymore against Vlad's sword. Sorry, I can't remember the name...
darkemoghost 1 year ago
@darkemoghost oo yea true
415erboy 1 year ago
its called a TARGE
dim432 1 year ago
@MrGodTube I agree, the Zande are badass.
nagaking07 1 year ago
@MrGodTube You raise a good point; Atilla would probably be a great opponent for Vlad; psycho against psycho. However, Vlad had a Handcannon; he doesn't qualify as an Ancient Warrior and as such he won't see Atilla on the battlefield.
And I'd have to agree there; here's how it'd go; the Zande Kpinga against Tomahawk, Boto Bow against Apache Bow, Knife vs Makraka and War Club vs Makrigga. The Zande would lose the edge with his bow, but his other three weapons, KICK ASS.
Volcanoran3 1 year ago
While they are just as good at combat, we have to admit, the Ming Dynasty were very skilled wall builders. The work on the Great Wall of China was very cool.
nagaking07 1 year ago
Oh well. I was expecting the Ming Warriors to lose, primarily do to the Musketeers armor (though I did hope for a Ming victory).
I kind of knew that the Musketeer would pull out his dagger and kill.
nagaking07 1 year ago
@fongdaihap The Rapier was not meant to take a direct hit; it was made to parry the thick and heavy English swords (like how he parried the dao we saw in the match) and deliver a killing blow while the enemy is wondering "How in the hell is this piece of steel holding off my attack?!" Or, if not a killing blow with Rapier, lead up with a stab from the Main Gauche to the face, neck, heart, or guts.
Dragonchaser1000 1 year ago
This part of the show is just a reenactment of what possibly would happen if the 2 ever faced off, and if you are putting the Rapier up against the Dao by itself the Dao would possibly have won but it didn't cause of the combo the Rapier had with the Main Gauche. With that 2 blades is better than 1. Well with thing about the show hating Asain is wrong cause had plenty of asian win there battles. For exmple: "Samurai vs Viking" (Samurai Won) "Shaolin Monk vs Māori Warrior" (Shaolin Monk Won).
WolfmanVsVampire 1 year ago
@fongdaihap a "real sword"????? a sword is defined as a a cutting or thrusting weapon that has a long metal blade and a hilt with a hand guard. So in the category of sword i think the rapier qualifies majorly, also the rapier can easily get through ribs and hit major muscles and organs, so you're more than welcome to get "poked" by a rapier and see how it feels.
xRKOx4life 1 year ago
begining of fight, the ming guy just stands in open to get shot...near end there were 2 mins left, and thy decide to fight the last musketeer 1 on 1 .....really now? ....deadliest warrior really hates the asians dont thy
azngook247 1 year ago 2
@azngook247
This show does not hate Asians. They have won twice (Samurai and Shaolin Monk).
JMDub89 1 year ago
go back and build walls go eat your crustants and go back to paris you french fucker
ShawdowCreeper 1 year ago 2
@ShawdowCreeper That was the worst insult ever, mostly in large part due to your inability to spell "croissant". (Btw i'm not french i just found your fanboy rage fail comical)
xRKOx4life 1 year ago
@xRKOx4life yo im chinese and I and I was offended when the french guy said the ming warrior should go back to china and build walls IM NOT A FANBOY!!!
ShawdowCreeper 1 year ago
@ShawdowCreeper Dude there's nothing wrong with being French. Lol calling someone a french fucker has basically no effect, considering they say the same about you guys. I'm part French and even I didn't take that in offense XD
darkblade8910 1 year ago
@greensucksbluerules Also it was meant to exploit weaknesses in steel armor, which the Mings didn't have, The Dao is great, a head lopper, I;m sure that's where it got it's kills from, But they never showed how effective it was on Musketeer armor, probably not at all.
Ivodrone881 1 year ago
Anyone notice how their grunts sound almost alike xD they gotta get new sounds
kenty41 1 year ago
i'm not disapointed that the musketeer won but my question is why would 2 soldiers go 1 v 1 when they can go 2 on 1. Honor wasn't that big of a thing for ming warriors. And even if they did why did the first ming swordsman didn't immediately go for a kill when the flintlock pistol misfired and why didn't the second ming warrior not use his high ground to his advantage.
s10fisto01 1 year ago
whoo hoo! musketeer FTW!!!
CrImSoNKiD007 1 year ago
ming sword was better wtf
1monkeymaster 1 year ago
@DrJayy7 you're an idiot, stupid retard
xRKOx4life 1 year ago
@xRKOx4life shut the fuck up bitch dont call me a fuckin retard come to my face and say that and i will beat the shit out of you
DrJayy7 1 year ago
@DrJayy7 Are you saying your face is an area, otherwise it would be hard to come to your face. Also how old are you, 10?
xRKOx4life 1 year ago
Musketeers Rules.
WolfmanVsVampire 1 year ago
im surprised the musketeers won and even though they did won im surprised by how much
midniteblue777 1 year ago
Heh. It was expected.
duelrunner 1 year ago
the ming gun looks like a gatling
mottmattproductions 1 year ago
and plus the ming army beaten the dutch army who were equipped almost the same way as the musketeers in 1661 over Taiwan during the sino-dutch war
triggersots4686 1 year ago