DAWKINS LOSES AGAIN! - ATHEISM DEALT A CRIPPLING BLOW !

[IcemanSupaFly]

@MrMegatruth

all you have is lies steven.

[MrMegatruth]

@IcemanSupaFly

stevie, i am going to respect owen's wishes an refrain from vulgar, irrelevant posts

maybe you can do the same of at least owen's videos

[IcemanSupaFly]

@MrMegatruth

ok megarevealer

[MrMegatruth]

@IcemanSupaFly

steven, it would be nice if you did not lie

[MrMegatruth]

creationists want answers like god done it

the natural world is more complex than that

read dennett's books

[owensphil]

@MrMegatruth

Makes mor sense than to say nobody dunnit

[MrMegatruth]

@owensphil you keep telling yourself that

[owensphil]

@MrMegatruth

> you keep telling yourself that

Whatever "that" is OK

[WildCatsKitten1]

@MrMegastalker you said "proving a lie is proving a negative"

ROFLMAO@U

[ExtrackterYT]

Lame questioneer: "what is the answer, what is the answer-I'm waiting" (silly man try to dartboarding Dennett)...

Dawkins: "Read Dennetts BOOKS!" I's simply the only answer but that guy will never read a book about the subject because he can't and won't - he do not want to know it for real.

lol - "strong atheism"

Kudos to Dennett, Dawkins and others' stamina for the debates regarding these questions.

And seriously - Where in Odins name did the Dawker loose?!

[owensphil]

@ExtrackterYT

No, Dennent could have easily use his minute to give an idea of the response. That was a copout to save face in front of the audience. Anybody who picks up a book flips it over to get an idea what the book is about. He didnt even ask for time to explain what his idea was about.

[Nietzschean1000]

I believe that no omnipotent benevolence exists. There are probably other reasons to discredit the idea of God/Allah/Yahweh but I don't really see a mathematical proof for God's non existence here. Plenty of reasons but they're not exactly math. More like reasoning or references to longer arguments.

[Nietzschean1000]

1. The problem of evil2. Poor design. - So many inhabitable planets3. God being omniscient? Didn't he foresee Eve eating of the fruit?4. Omnipotence self-contradictions. Create coffee so hot he cannot drink it?5. Occam's Razor - The supernatural is not necessary to explain the universe

[dinopad10]

Dick Dawkins is logically crippled and has an intellect based solely on sarcasm. In other words, he's like every other atheist in the world.

[dinopad10]

@Chuck1863 If you don't see how sophomoric your statement is, please go away.

[Chuck1863]

Why is it that the people who know the least about what's currently inside the circle claim to know the most about what's outside the circle?

[RighteousPaladin]

@Chuck1863 No one knows what's outside the circle. It's just that the followers of Jesus Christ have a larger circle that encapsulates the naturalists' self-imposed circle of material truths.

[Chuck1863]

@RighteousPaladin But if someone is wrong about what's in the smaller circle, how can their knowledge of the larger circle be trusted?

[RighteousPaladin]

@Chuck1863 A neurosurgeon may make a poor mechanic: put your faith in one to fix your brain and the other your vehicle.

[Chuck1863]

@RighteousPaladin The neurosurgeon is aware that he's not a mechanic. People making claims about gods don't seem to be aware that they don't really know whether or not their gods even exist.

[RighteousPaladin]

@Chuck1863 Yes, that does seem almost as bad as the neurosurgeon expressing certainty that brains exist. Perhaps he should run it by the mechanic?

[Chuck1863]

@RighteousPaladin Neurosurgeons can see brains and get useful results by operating on them.