Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (102)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I LOVE RUSSIA <3 !!! :)))

  • Your vid is a favorite on Santo Domingo

  • you all here this nonsense carry! what kind of war you say here? Russian attack on the west and north is very dangerous - this is the first one! secondly - you will not forget again, Russia, nuclear power! and those morons who write here do not with your head thinks! you even imagine what would happen if this is World War 3!

  • Comment removed

  • R.I.P. F22

  • These are some seriously bad-ass looking state-of-the-art off road tractors the Russians make. Tell the Americans, Brits, Germans, or whoever you want to top the Russians in this department...

  • prob the only peace of military machinery that works in russia.

  • Stealth is overrated. That was proven during the war in Serbia. During that time they were just using old soviet radars and SAMs and they've shot down a F-117.

    Now. With better technology getting better all the time, on both sides. Better radars and extremely long range SAMs. I think in the future air force will be obsolete.

  • How about the new SHIELDs systems: watch?v=w_dbWtpTGig

    S-400 is capable of FUCK this Trophy system??????? Thanks!

  • super army!

    USA fuck!!!!!

  • ... to all the russian and USA lovers out there...... grow up... stop play CoD.... and when you get abit more mature... you will know that war IS NOT about the weapons..... but politics.!

  • usa patriots just sucking well its the fact hehehe :)

  • Please give this to Iran, Syria and DPRK - so they not end like Libya as a slave of western imperialism.

  • @Rain2103 richtig so !!!nieder mit dem kapitalistischem imperalismus!!!

  • Vietnam also has this system. Vietnamese-made (with Russian technology)

  • @armyreco name of the song

  • As the name of this truck? 0:06

  • NATO must do Air Deface Systems at Turkey to keep worlds peace and keep europe safe against some countries(DF31-S300)

  • SERBIA NEEDS THIS!!!! AND THAN COME U AMERICAN FAGS TO BOMBING AS!!!!!! U WILL BE GET ONE BIG SUPPRISE!!!!!!!! FUCK NATO AND USA!!!!!!! LONG LIVE ORTHODOX SLAVIC WHITE POWER RUSSIA AND SERBIA 4EVER!!!!!! 1389

  • @019Srb unfortunately if you will be attacked by 400 nato planes and missiles from all directions one battery of s400 won't help. they simply overwhelm it. one launcher carries 4 missles only. accually you need whole range of AA pieces. Mobile things like Pantsir then Buk then s300 will be enough. Then Iskander to hit aircraft carriers and airfields and so on. and expecially maybe 10 nukes and will to use them. then you may beat off nato.

  • @019Srb even russia with all her strength rely on nuke missile retribution strike scenario if she encounters either with nato or usa or china in total shootout till death. so russia do not hope to win them in total war but simply not to lose them. serbia may resist for some time and save her honor but eventually they win.

  • I did not think of one piece, but at least six batteries of S-300 or S-400 with the support of Buk-M2E and Panthcir S1 short-range systems with existing systems S-200M,CUB M2,and the Pecora-M1T Neva M, streamlined system BOFORS, Prague M. I personally think that and for the NATO, this kind of anti-air defense was really the problem. And Serbia is currently working on their own airdefence system on the basis, systems of Indian Akash medium-range 60-80km.ORTHODOX SLAVIC WHITE POWER 1389!!!!

  • @019Srb you better develop nukes and eil to use them. theyll make you untouchable.

  • @kolja2003 Yes you are right brother, Serbia is currently working on two separate projects, the first is based on vacuum bombs, which are working in cooperation with Russia and that has to be something as small A-bomb without the effects of radiation and the other is based on the missile plant medium and long reange with conventional weapons or nuclear, something like Iskander missiles !!!!!!

  • looks like B2 spirit fodder to me

  • @CraftPakistani - you know why seagulls fly upsidedown over pakistan? Because your 3rd world, terrorist supporting country aint worth shitting on, i hope the indians nuke you fvckn refugees back to the stoneage, oops your already there....FUCK PAKISTAN!

  • next step in russian SAM is to use a bulava missile fitted with IR and EM seaker =o)

  • GO RUSSIA!

  • Serbia wants this!!!

  • russia!!!!! but i love america

  • In Russia....President assassinates you!!

  • Afghanistan has nothing but da whole world cant control it Imagine if it gets a NUclear end of the world

  • i guess these vehicles have been the insurance for the cold war

  • US F-22 Pilot: Sweet my plane is best in world and super stealth, let's fly over Russia, their S-400 will never detect my plane.

    INCOMING MISSILE

    US F-22 Pilot: Shit.

  • @ShadowRSonic Successful flight the clown! You on f22 even won't reach border! The kamikaze!

  • @ShadowRSonic You are wrong!! The S-400 can detect and destroy any incoming missile or Aircraft including the Raptor and Stealth!!! Do a research before you post stupid arrogant comments!

  • @Antizionist4life

    No, you're being stupid. That's what my comment was saying, moron. Perhaps learn some English before criticising my comments and calling me stupid.

  • @Antizionist4life =S400 ISNT WORKING ON TOMAHAWKS=...........

    =OTHERWISE,FOR THIS DEVELOPED PANTSIR=.......

    =BUT S400 DEFENDING FROM BALLISTIC MISSILES=........

    =SO IF ALONE,S400 IS STILL VULNERABLE=......

    =AND SINGLE ROCKET OF S400 TOO EXPENSIVE TO B USED AGAINST TOMAHAWKS=.....

    =SO ANYWAY OTHER COMPLEXES ARE NEEDED=.......

  • @robotnikkkk I DON'T AGREE WITH YOU,THE S-400 CAN DETECT AND DESTROY ANY INCOMING MISSILE INCLUDING THE TOMAHAWKS AND ANY AIRCRAFT INCLUDING STEALTHS AND RAPTORS. AND YOU SAY THAT A SINGLE ROCKET OF THE S-400 IS TOO EXPENSIVE? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?? EVERY SINGLE TOMAHAWK MISSILE COST A MILLION DOLLARS!!! LOL..

  • @Antizionist4life =HMMMMMM CAN BE FIRED NUMEROUS TOMAHAWKS AND THEIR NUMBER CAN OVERWHELM NUMBER OF ROCKETS WHAT S-400 GOT AAAND THERE'S CAN BE MORE SIGNIFICANT TARGETS THAN TOMAHAWKS SO S-400 WONT B USED AGAINST TOMAHAWKS AND WILL LEAVE THOSE TO SYSTEMS THAT WERE CREATED AGAINST TOMAHAWKS=......=SUCH AS PANTSIR HEHE

    =SOOO YEP S400 CAN HIT TOMAHAWKS BUT WONT DO IT BECAUSE OF S400 WILL ACT NOT ALONE AND LINKED WITH SYSTEMS OF CLOSER RANGE=...

    =BETTER HIT DOWN AIRCRAFTS

  • @Antizionist4life =SO AT REAL WAR S400 WILL BE ACT NOT ALONE AND LINKED WITH SYSTEMS SUCH AS BUK,TOR,PANTSIR AND THAT'LL MAKE REAL SHIELD AGAINST EVERYTHING HEHE SO EVERYTHING WHAT US GOT TO GET AIR ADVANTAGE WILL BE DESTROYED HEHE

    =BUUUT TOO LESS OF S400 SO NEED MUCH MORE BECAUSE OF NO ONE KNOWS WHAT US GOT ON MIND=........

  • @robotnikkkk EITHER WAY,A WAR CAN NOT BE WON WITH JUST TOMAHAWK MISSILES IF ALL THEIR AIRFORCE GETS SHOT DOWN,WITHOUT AIR SUPPORT IS HARD TO WIN A WAR! DON'T FORGET THAT THE TOMAHAWK MISSILES ARE FIRED FROM WARSHIPS WHICH CAN BE DESTROYED BY ANTI-SHIP MISSILES!

  • @ShadowRSonic not.

  • @ShadowRSonic Your comment is confusing,if you knew how to explain that better i would not get confused moron! learn how to write and explain things right!

  • @Antizionist4life

    My comment was written in perfect English, perhaps it is thou who doth need to learn to read things right?

  • @ShadowRSonic Actually, stealth is stealth, this sh** is useless against F-22.

  • @aliancemd

    Hahaha. No.

  • @aliancemd =NOPE,USEFUL=...

    =RUSSIAN GOT SYSTEMS WHAT CAN SEE STEALTH EQUAL TO USUAL PLANE=.....

  • @ShadowRSonic Your comment is so inaccurate it's funny

  • @DTxSTUFF

    The US Armed Forces are so inaccurate it's funny.

    *cough*friendly fire*cough*

  • @ShadowRSonic thats a low punch, but true. The armor of the m1 abrams was never pierced by an enemy weapon. All the tank losses were from others m1 or courtesy of the a10's gau 8 30mm gatling cannon

  • USA HAVE PATRIOT RUSSIA HAVE S 400

    ;)

  • ESTE SISTEMA DE MISILES ANTI-AEREOS S-400 TRIUMF PUEDEN DERRIBAR BLANCOS DEL TAMAÑO DE UN BALON DE FUTBOL A 50 KILOMETROS DE ALTURA Y QUE VUELAN A UNA VELOCIDAD DE 5 KILOMETROS POR SEGUNDO

  • more thor's

  • '

    what is ussr russia always make WASTE WASTE arms weapons and slavery ussr russia country

  • anti pussie too

  • what about the launch =(

  • S-400 hungry for F-22 F-35 B-2.

  • @SAMTOMAS indeed. and they can "see" them quite clearly - Serbs used "ancient" S-125 neva in 1999 and successfully shot down F-117 - so much for american stealth. :D

  • @Archy11102 indeed man...russian always good with anti-air...t

  • Wow the S-400 can only carry 4 missiles, the PAC-3 canisters can hold up to 16.

  • @tonygogap

    Your point? A S-400 battery (at least 4 launch vehicles) operates with short-range SAM's like Pantsir-S1 or the upcoming Vityaz and Morfei.

  • @brocalfur It can still only carry 4 missiles.

  • @tonygogap

    PAC-3 missiles are much smaller with less speed and much less range...even inferior to PAC-2. It would be easy to build a vehicle which holds 48 missiles for the Tor-M1 system.

  • @tonygogap

    Wow the S-400 outclasses the PAC series in range, speed, operational ceiling and a dozen other stats.

  • @TovarishGlushkov1 I dont really care man. The PAC3 is good enough.

  • @tonygogap they are long range and carry bigger warhead. they must destroy big plane like awaks airplane or b52 to shreds by one missile hit. but you right there are going the development smaller missile with same range and power.

  • Long Live Pakistan Long live Russian

    & Fucked Israil Fuck USA

  • oh fuck and blackbird goes dowwwwwwwn 1-0 for russia

  • Jesus Christ! No one will ever successfully invade Russia. It seems to me that the Russian have the best Anti-everything. good to see that they think in terms of defense rather than domination, like the ameriKKKunts

  • @rustaayy russians still have missiles, usa has haarp...

  • @MrOldCrow Thats science fiction...

  • @MrOldCrow yeah... russian don't do earth quakes, usa do.

  • @MrOldCrow ::Lol Haarp is just a toy because the Russia has a much bigger and badder version of haarp ,its called "Scalar" .Russia had these weapons since the 60s. Google " Russian Scalar weapons".There are 100s of websites that saying Russia is well ahead of US in tesla tech.

  • @Egect666 do they actually use them or do they actually function?

  • @MrOldCrow :: Did you google it? Not only do they function they have been engineering the weather over North america for the past 40 yrs.I can give you some links.

  • @rustaayy you are the racist one... all of you people are xenophobe atleast we accept anyone from anywhere...go write a book about how white people are the best you KKKUNTs...

  • @MrAcehard America, which was founded on slavery and has an entrenched split in racial classes and terrorist groups like the KKK "accepts anyone from anywhere"? I dont think so

  • @rustaayy except the germans! no wait.....russian weather saved you

  • @boogalooshrimpable Did you mean God by "weather" ?

  • @rustaayy It was sad, Russian stabbed Iranian over S-300 agreed and signed deal for ameriKKKunts.

  • @rustaayy The best russian anti-everything is winter.

  • @3DSFuture so why isnt russia death jet?? if they receive such a massive destruction weapon every year??

  • @rustaayy yes dude seen long time ago Russia has been a defense country like many other.

    general know in the only way to prevent USA to strike then even though USA are afraid of then in my opinion.

  • @rustaayy

    Russians are real Christians.

  • @lmgtech Russians are real .

    ( Of course am speaking out of automatic -always justified- hatred to america and hence automatic love for what appears to be the only reason the world hasn't fallen completely under the stars and stripers yet , russia , lol but i think russians are fine regardless )

  • one side note i believe cursing america has become a very guaranteed way of getting thumbs up here on youtube......perhaps there's hope yet XD

  • @Maximus5230

    Sorry i currently do not satisfied with my comment .Its was false.

  • @rustaayy Possibly. The only thing that would make it impossible would be irregulars that would show up once major combat operations are over. Otherwise the current Russian military is very limited. It's forces are spread across massive distances of land, it's navy divided up by geographic bottlenecks, & it's military isn't exceptionally trained.

    militaryphotos . net/forums/showthread . php?175769-Defending-Mother-Ru­ssia

    But it would only be possible by a Chinese, US, or just NATO sized force.

  • @CraftPakistani Pakistan u smell..........

  • @CraftPakistani Shut up faggot. If it weren't for us you wouldn't even have light bulbs, cars, TV, and aircraft.

    So shut the fuck up FAGGOT. :P

  • @CraftPakistani

    you are terrorist or smth?

  • Russa Roxssssss.. Love you

    India Sucks... fook u India

  • @CraftPakistani Russia might rock, but Pukistan?!!!  Hahahahahahahaa wouldnt do us any good to bomb your stinking shithole of a country, already 4th world...

  • The Patriot Air Defence System is a Joke against S-300 & S-400. An Expert said that on Rianovosti.

  • Russia needs to deploy those s400's, to all allied nations of Russia. Counter u.s patriot missile's

  • if i will be presedent of russia world can say GOODBYE AMERICA 

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more