If you look at it, that is just R' D L2 D' R from the back side ;) I didn't bother to turn the cube around because one doesn't need to if they know the algorithms.
Very cool... he's my favorite professor at UT. I went to school with his son in Kindergarten... Surreal but very awesome to see his name all over when googling Rubik's cube.
Yessss. I woke up today, and without the printout of the solve, I beat it twice with that method! A little more practice to get it down, but nice vids.
I wish someone would teach us God's Algorithm(Maximum 20 moves).
Caramelman007 8 months ago
@Caramelman007 it's imposible for human, it's not 1 alg, its one alg according to a particular case, there are around 43 billions
lockshore1 1 month ago
@Pseudoprogrammer
I hope you're still active around here...could you please explain a bit more in detail about solving 2 bad edges...
maheshwarbsb 1 year ago
@maheshwarbsb
Just made a video explaining it.
youtube dotcom /watch?v=knTGd5NcDlI
Pseudoprogrammer 1 year ago
@Pseudoprogrammer
thanks a ton mate:)
maheshwarbsb 1 year ago
Comment removed
eason97 2 years ago
this is how god solves the rubiks cube
ChrisDude13 2 years ago
what's the advantages of this method?
leen866 2 years ago
It's fun!
ment4lbre4kdown 2 years ago
can solve in fewer moves
gregor1u5 1 year ago
I always got 2 bad edges and I dunno what to do-.-
died00pelNull 3 years ago
It can be done in 3 moves. Get a solved cube and do R U R'. This creates 2 bad edges. Simply apply the opposite principle to your problem.
Pseudoprogrammer 3 years ago
your Algorithms in your info is wrong...
in the 2 corner twist "mirror" you did L,D,R2,D',L'
oOddkillerOo 3 years ago
If you look at it, that is just R' D L2 D' R from the back side ;) I didn't bother to turn the cube around because one doesn't need to if they know the algorithms.
Pseudoprogrammer 3 years ago
Very cool... he's my favorite professor at UT. I went to school with his son in Kindergarten... Surreal but very awesome to see his name all over when googling Rubik's cube.
jrlepage 3 years ago
thank you so much!
wassagoinon 3 years ago
looks like a blind solve method
JohnnyFearsome 3 years ago
It would be preettty much impossible to solve BLD with this. Unless you are some sort of god being or something.
Pseudoprogrammer 3 years ago
now that i look at it more, i guess i was wrong. oh well.
JigsawMaster 3 years ago
Yessss. I woke up today, and without the printout of the solve, I beat it twice with that method! A little more practice to get it down, but nice vids.
userdoubleoseven 3 years ago
I like it, but I have a slight problem with the first step... a little more practice. More training.
userdoubleoseven 3 years ago
Thanks grant! (It's John)
52ofem 3 years ago
Hmm, I do happen to like the Human Thistlethwaite... I use Y/W on U/D, though. :-P
It's good to see some other interest in it....
LucasGarron 3 years ago