Added: 5 years ago
From: iamaphoney
Views: 31,040
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (166)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ths is fucked up i hope paul didint die but wtf i hav my doubts he really might be dead his looks change so much between 1966 and 67 its really quite crzy

  • The thing is...if you look at the 66 "Rain" video, then, the 67 "Strawberry Fields" video done by the Beatles, "Paul" does look different---(that's not a very long time span between the two)...i.e. the eye color, face size & body size---facial look and expression etc., is quite different...Nairobi in Kenya, may be the Key....66/67.....was it just "Plastic Surgery" and a 20lb. weight loss?--OR--

    Was "Old Paul"--Metaphorically dead...or, was he---really really DEAD?

  • everybodies like" johns a genious" but he couldnt ever figure out how to do this....sure he could he was a beatle!

  • The loud noise at the beginning made me jump, I'm done.

  • Why couldn't they make him give a DNA test to put an end to all this nonsense?

  • Here's the thing: Even IF Paul had died at that point ... so what? The replacement was BETTER! And why would the remaining 3 original beatles be so fucking obssessed with the old, dead Paul and not just move on and make music??

  • 0:20

    paul looks retarded

  • @sonicsalt99 AHAHAH

  • @mollehhhx what ?

  • @sonicsalt99 paul looking retarded idk made me laugh :3

  • why don't we ask his mother?

  • The Beatles figure out this story and you fool believe it!hahaha

  • get a life phoney. If you play every beatles song backwards, i'm sure you'll hear "paul is dead" in every groove if that's what you want to hear. Maybe he did die, but claiming all this as evidence really is very thin and very subjective.

  • Lets take two pictures at different ages. angles and facial expression and compare them. Because it proves everything in the world. Dumb asses. Sorry but a few years ago I did not look the same. No one does! Everyone changes! My face is a different shape, things have moved, my voice doesn't sound the same and my eye color has changed from brown to green. Oh shit... know what that means! I'm dead and have been replaced with someone else! All these years I never knew!

  • @xNikkaX3 D: i need to find your records to prove you have been replaced ;)

  • @xNikkaX3 unless you were 5 and 15 inbetween the photos- that is not the same man in those photos, scientists have measured and checked, Paul is dead and was replaced.

  • @xNikkaX3 thats exactly what that means, it happend to me

  • @xNikkaX3 I know you posted this comment a year ago but I agree with you. As we age our faces and features change - the shape of the skull changes and so does eye colour, nose shape, mouth shape(lips get thinner), ears, chin everything changes that applies to all of us except Paul Mccartney his face changed because he was getting older but people said he had died and was replaced by a look alike because he looked different after 1966

  • @xNikkaX3 tell if u grew 2 inches after 24 did your blood type change did u decide to be right handed if u were left and did the lines on your palms change too along with hair color and ear lobes from attached to detached dipshit

  • @xNikkaX3 Did your eyes change color too, stupid!!!!!!! And did you change the hand you write with, stupid!!!!!!!!

    You're an idiot. Which is exactly why it was soooooooooooooo easy to fool the public idiots like YOU! All that was needed was to hold a Paul look-alike contest (ask yourself why just Paul??????) The guy looked enough like Paul that all was needed was several plastic surgeries. BUT PAUL'S EYES WERE BROWN--NOT BLUE.

    Biggest clue: Faul is nothing like original Paul.

  • I don't realy believe that Paul is dead. I think they used a lot of drugs and did it.

  • nose cirgury

  • «You're not very observant. Haven't you noticed they don't have the same faces?» u had written this a few time ago... this means, u think it's diferent persons....

    ?

  • I def think it's a different person. In the space of 4 months (Aug-Dec 1966), Paul undergoes quite an astonishing metamorphosis. His nose, eyes, eyebrows, ears, forehead, hair, & mouth change. He even grows taller. It also seems like his voiceprint might have changed. Yep, pretty remarkable...

  • Uh I must be living a lie my whole life. I don't look like myself after a few months of heavy smoking. And shitty cameras make my green eyes look brown.

  • How come a death certificate has never surfaced....hmmmm?

  • very very good point

  • esto fue una broma de los bitels aunke siepre hay dudas

  • What´s the big deal with all this comparing photos. Everyone is getting older and fatter...

  • He is alive and well. Every clue is debunked. When you reverse "number nine", you don't only hear "Turn me on, dead man", you can also hear " Lend me your arms, Batman" or "Mean me harm, sad man" or "See your charm, Lennon".

  • "Every clue is debunked."

    You mean except for the fact that they don't look alike? AT ALL? Yeah, sorry, Pal. Paul was replaced. Live a lie if you want.

  • Hahaha...wow, are there really still people that believe this? I'm dumbfounded. Faulcon you need to have your head checked.

  • you should have your eyes checked for not being able to tell the difference between 2 completely difft people :-o

  • hey faulconansnowjob please indulge me and take your time to view this video: watch?v=huNOsFQa_Ns Now if that's not the same person than I really don't know who is. Paul is not dead.

  • the very first picture of Paul on that video looks like it's been tampered with to me

  • Well the first example is just silly but the rest of them clearly show that he's not dead.

  • your dumb.Look at the dent in Paul's teeth... it's there in the early pics and in the later pics.

  • You're not very observant. Haven't you noticed they don't have the same faces?

    And anyway, who's dumb? I bet you don't have as many graduate degrees as I have. lol

  • I didn't know clown college had a graduate program.

  • I bet I'm right that you have nary a graduate degree. Did you even finish high school?

  • wow faulcon, you know me so well.

  • holy shit this made me laugh

  • lolololool

    what a klown u are, mr faulconandsnowjob,....

    what's that have to do with anything....

  • it's Ms. Faulconandsnowjob to you

  • is the Ms a hint...?

    shall we compare degrees?

  • you couldn't even begin to compare

  • we can, if u want, but still, wath does that have to do with Paul being or not dead??

    i'm an acountant, u?

  • lawyer

  • mmmm , i don't think so....

    further more, it has nothing to do with the subject.... Paul is Dead, the Beatles aren't... business as usual.....

  • You don't think so what? And no, of course, it has nothing to do w/ Paul being dead, but some people want to get into pissing matches.

  • it was fun! :)

    And this Faul story is hard to believe, of course it's possible but....

    What confuses me most is the reversed music.... how can it be? u think backwards as u think the song? (when writting the song, composing...).

    is it ur subconscious? How is it possible?? i hear many different things than the ones they say here.... i do hear what they claim, but i can hear other stuff 2..

    oh, i also heard somewhere else, that he got disfigured in the acident, but survived,and sang on Records

  • it was fun! :)

    And this Faul story is hard to believe, of course it's possible but....

    What confuses me most is the reversed music.... how can it be? u think backwards as u think the song? (when writting the song, composing...).

    is it ur subconscious? How is it possible?? i hear many different things than the ones they say here.... i do hear what they claim, but i can hear other stuff 2..

    oh, i also heard somewhere else, that he got disfigured in the acident, but survived,and sang on Records

  • I notice you have Loose Change on your YT page. That 9/11 was an inside job is v hard for some people to believe, too. Doesn't mean it isn't true, tho. Those people are capable of pretty much anything.

    And about back-masking, it could be purposefully placed there or subconscious. There may be some other mechanism, too.

    Paul got in a moped accident in Dec 1965. He chipped a tooth but was hardly "disfigured." You can see the tooth in the Rain/Paperback Writer vids.

  • no, i'm 100 % sure 9/11=inside job... definatelly :)

    and about what u said on back-masking, purposefully placed there,.. ok, but how? how do u make a nice song, or not, and then in reverse it says stuff (debatable)??

    what do u mean moped? i just had heard that disfigured theory somewhere, can' say where, 1k's of videos here......

    and i don't get it, u believe his dead or not? i thought u did....

    why do u say he just chiped his tooth, meaning u think he is alive ?

  • We agree about 9/11.

    I've compared many photos & videos, & imo, the last time Paul appeared was Aug, possibly Sept, 1966. So, what happened to him? Some people think there was a car crash in 1966, & that's when he died or was disfigured. I think it was a hit, but that's JMO.

    I'm not a studio engineer, so I can't speak to back-masking, but this video has an interesting theory:

    watch?v=sAu07d3iQy0

  • i had seen it before, thank u :)

  • I say it again, Faulcon, for the last time. I know you're going to deny it, but people can look very different in two different photo's, so this is no proof. Don't reply to this, because I know your reaction:"you are not very observant"....

  • That's debunked too. That are two different pictures. Look at other comparisons, then you see it's still the same man. You also look different from another viewpoint. You see? PID is Bullshit!

  • Well if he isn't really Paul, he should at least have the dignity to tell us before he dies.

  • "Well if he isn't really Paul, he should at least have the dignity to tell us before he dies."

    I think he has been telling us w/ subtle hints & clues :-)

  • ur full of shit, pauls alive dubm ass

  • hes not full of shit.Paul is alive but bac in the day the Beatles pulled a stunt 2 get more ppl 2 buy their records.They told ppl Paul died in a car crash when he had a fight with the others and stormed out.Then in songs lik strawberry fields theres a lot of clues about him "dying".He really just moved to some other place but for a long time ppl thought he was rly dead.Hav u looked at the other rotten apples?The earlier ones are rly good.take a look at them.

    p.s. you cant even spell "dumb ass"!

  • You can't spell "Really", "People" or "Like" ;)

  • i had to make it all fit. i did it like that on purpose that "dubm" ass

  • That is truly Paul in ALL pictures. It's called aging and lighting.

  • and plastic surgery

  • i really respect the time spent here to make these series available, but being honest, I just can't find it true...makes no sense...I don't think Paul McCartney is dead...

  • I'm sorry but that is clearly the same man in those photos no matter how you dice it.

  • wtf sure has lost his head

  • this is a load o bull, get it orf or ill phone macca to kill you

    turn me on dead man my arse

  • This is DEMONIAC!!!

    Devil is a Liar, and who believe in this is a Devil's slave.

  • fuck your are a stupid person

  • you're*

  • dude thats just dumb! paul is not dead!

  • sounds nice backwards!

  • Yes, but did any other singer Paul was acquainted with years later end up looking different?

  • Something I found out a couple of years ago...if you repeat number 9, number 9, number9 into your computer recorder and then play that backwards it does come back as turn me on deadman, turn me on deadman, turn me on deadman...try it and see!!...

  • Yes it does.

  • your a dumb fuck if you think that the beatles wasted their time trying to figure out a way to put hidden messages when played backwards!!...LOL!...STUPID SHIT!!

  • well that was obnoxious.

    and I'm pretty sure they did experiment with backmasking a bit. I bet one of the "messages" had to have been intentional, not because Paul is dead and they wanted to tell us but just because they were playing around with it.

    I mean Revolution 9 isn't even a song, its just ambiguous noise and dialog. Its seems to be a totally experimental track.

  • i have to agree, how could they make good songs that make sense wile also puting fucked up shit when you play it backwards. AS far as some of the more tripy stuff gos, you try taking Acid and not come up "strage" things

  • you moron seem to be more interested in proving paul death than in enjoyin beatles and paul music

    FUCKKKKKKKKK YOURSELF, YOUR FUCKING RESEARCH CAN SUCK MY BALLLSS!

  • paul is not dead!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • this is so stupid i cant believe i believe it wanker

  • WOW....sucks to be you... I mean...you can't even enjoy the beautifull heritage of love and music Paul McCartney has given, and still gives us.

    really...sucks to be you

  • The one on the left at the start doesn't look like Paul or Faul - he looks like Griff Rhys Jones.

  • omfg, ur all fucking losers...

  • Says the person who gave us:

    "john lennon is my fave,,hes the hottest guy on the planet!!well i know,,,hes not on the planet anymore but ya neva know!!!"

  • omg u botherd 2 look at that?? ur even more of a loser!!!and johhn lennon WAS hott!!!and paul IS NOT dead u freaks!!! jeez

  • no Paul isn't dead you're right...But it's still fun to look at all these clues and stuff. Does anyone agree?

  • i agree with u i've been watching these vids 4 a while i like watching them its interesting.

  • /watch?v=QAodDH5EjJY

  • 24 is one of the best ones, for many reasons.

    Pause on 00:42 and compare the noses. Look at Paul's cheekbone.

  • The deniers make me laugh - the symbolism, ultra-specific and lots of it, is clearly there. Anyone who tries to mockingly dimsiss it all as conincidental or over-interpreted is in denial. Whether that means he died or not - who knows? But why go to all that trouble as a "joke"? And as for the 1966 date being out of step with the album clues timeline, he must've died earlier then - if not then why does the earlier symbolism exist at all?

  • all what trouble?? throwing in a few backward mumbo jumbo and little "clues" on album covers..seriously get a life

  • There's no clues, people have made them up themselves, the Beatles are so powerful and popular they have a massive influence on peoples perceptions. Its all a massive hoax, Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr are both alive, George and John are dead, regretably.

  • "There's no clues, people have made them up themselves"

    No. The clues,symbols and imagery are there whether Paul is actually dead or not.

  • The clues, symbols and imagery are all pretty poor to say the least. The fact that 'iamaphoney' has to edit them all into quasi-surrealist, disjointed and movies prooves how much of it is based on so little. Any actual research into some of alleged symbols, such as the open palm gesture, walking with out shoes or backwards recordings are impotant, they proove nothing apart from the fact that people can be susceptible to complete and utter arse-gravy.

  • "The clues, symbols and imagery are all pretty poor to say the least"

    No, they're not. A few are very obtuse, many obvious.

    "The fact that 'iamaphoney' has to edit them all into quasi-surrealist, disjointed and movies prooves how much of it is based on so little."

    The clues were around before IAAP (apart from the ones he found).

  • the biggest problem w/ believing he died in 66 is that thier were clues on-rubbersoul,revolver,and"the butcher album" [yesterday n today-american rerelease of singles and b sides]-so,the time line needs sum fixing-mayby he died in 65?and had already

    done alot of recordings[usauly takes a while 2 release,kwim?]but then they'd need a replacement much sooner 4 the tours-obviously,

    it's a haox,but it's still very creepy n cool

  • Pause at 39 secs*Paul on left has different ear cavity,nostrils are bigger,hair is curly and lighter,and the distance from eye to ear is longer on Faul{R}than Paul{L},but there is alot that is dead on,"no pun intended"*So also JPM{R}looks much older than JPM{L}than the 3 or so years that account for the time lapse*If thias be true,Why would they leave clues?Why put messages backwards,when they could have gotten away with it?

  • I'm starting to think the guy or gal posting these is doing it as a psych experiment.

    I wish I had a hint as to whether or not this series is all a prank, a phoney...

  • fuk of

    he wasnt cuter

  • he looked the same... and if it's a fake paul he wrote some of the greatest songs ever

  • yeah and so did the real paul

    yesterday, help!, a hard days night, are all cool w

    2!!!

    so wot do u know!!

  • i know that you can eat a dick lolol

  • Or George Martin/Tavistock did.

  • Pause at :38 and 'Faul's' ear looks messed up as if it was undergoing transformation like the face. Hmmmm...I wonder what Paul's latest MAF song "House of Wax" is talking about?

  • 1: removed and destroyed by MI5

    2:Plastic surgery, vocal imitator & practice, replacement was talented musician, songs were ghost written

    3:All arranged by British Intelligence

    4: Told it was for the good of England, generous pensions and threats.

    5: See above

    6: Linda Eastman was a documented Intelligence operative of the CIA, working closely with MI5

    this is the best overview so far....just imo, of course.

  • this is not the same man.say whatever you want,believe it or not,but the two men in the video are DIFFERENT.

    just stare at HIS eyes on the Strawberry Fields video.Fuckin' creeeeepy

  • i forgot what song it was but when it was played backwards it said "Turn me on dead man" over and over.what if john what talking about himself kinda like a "revelation" cuz he was shot DEAD!!!

  • Pause at :20 and you can clearly see the two different men. Paul's eyes are farther apart and have eyelashes. Faul's are lighter, closer, and lack the lashes.

  • dead man = Brian Epstein

  • ah ok thanks :)

  • beatle backmasking = just a hoax

    for those who belive paul is not dead check out "paul is NOt dead - belive it or not series" on youtube,

    not as good as the rotten apple series but tells the truth

  • I watched some of the vids from 'paul is not dead'---and most of them are distorting Paul's head or of poor quality = FALSE evidence.

  • To the people who think he is dead.

    1. What happened to the car.

    2. How did the Beatles so quickly find an imposter that looks, sounds, as talented and as good song writer as paul.

    3. How did 'Faul' get pauls bank account and house etc.

    4. Why would pauls family let an imposter into there lives?

    5. Why didnt jane leave 'Faul' 'straight away' after the 'supposed death'?

    6. So linda was tricked into thinking he was the real paul?

  • 1: removed and destroyed by MI5

    2:Plastic surgery, vocal imitator & practice, replacement was talented musician, songs were ghost written

    3:All arranged by British Intelligence

    4: Told it was for the good of England, generous pensions and threats.

    5: See above

    6: Linda Eastman was a documented Intelligence operative of the CIA, working closely with MI5

  • Look up Linda's bio. She is of Jewish decent like Brian was! Probably a mafia setup working with this imposter.

  • Well I have to say that maybe the Beatles did use the Paul is dead excuse to sell records but what really creeped me out was that the last tour was on 66 and they still recorded other great albums

  • the verry short bit where it shows a car racing down the road that cuts off to the left, is video footage from the james bond film casino royale. it is the scene where 007 roled his 2006 aston martin DB9S 13 times setting a new world record.

  • Your're right. That IS an Aston Martin that is involved in a crash. This is what happened to Paul according to the clues---he was involved in a wreck with HIS Aston Martin.

  • I don't think so. in the story where Paul "died" he was driving a different car. He didn't own an aston martin until 1974. who ever made this video may have just needed a video of a speedingcar and thought that this paticilar shot would work best.

  • Was the car then similar in appearance a white Austin Healy? There's one on the lap of the doll on the Sgt. Pepper album cover.

  • no, the austin healy looked more like the 1964 rolls royce phanntom in the james bond film Goldfinger. Only difference was it was a white austin healy and Goldfingers was a black rolls royce. and the car on the album cover is an austin healy. though is is hard to tell, that's what it is. I know my cars.

  • This guy's head is taller than Paul's, his nose is shorter with wider nostrils, the jaw line is shorter, his chin is bigger, right earlobe is different, and eyelids are shorter. Pause at 00:38.

  • I CLEARLY see two different Pauls !

  • The overbite is seen WITHOUT the moustache as well.

  • somebody asked me to stop by

    I would like to get in contact with you iamaphoney

  • i guess no one noticed you left a comment! but of course who would believe it's REALLY julian lennon! but if it is you was wondering what you think of paul is dead stuff? and if it is true just tell some one you know it is eating you alive!!!! you claim peace well how peace of mind!or to quote your father 'GIVE ME SOME TRUTH'

  • Two totally different profiles. Pause at 00:38. Faul has a slight overbite and Paul does not. At 00:48 you can clearly see that Faul has a pointier nose and wider mouth. His bangs are also going in the opposite direction.

  • Ok, let's do this one step by step. That "overbite" is called a mustache. Take that away and the lines overlap perfectly. In the second one, Paul is not smiling as wide, so his nose is not as spread out. The "wider mouth" is completely imaginary. Another thing you may know about the Beatles is that they changed their hairstyles.

  • Good point. The musical style changed radically from innocent "I love ya" songs to chaotic, nuage, fractured music in keeping with the slaughter of fine art we saw when the Jews introduced modern art and mocked classical realism as "childish" and "mediocre." See Hitler's art if you want to see the type of beauty the Jews characterize as "mediocre." You will be astounded.

  • TrollonaRoll; that's creepier than anything anyone else has said.

  • Ima:

    One thing I find fascinating and uncited:

    Paul wrote serious, angry, sometimes maudlin songs.

    Faul sings lots of goofy tunes, very music hall cheeky.

    The lyrical style did a 180, have not seen that cited.

    I look at The Rutles and wonder if maybe Neil Innes or someone was doing the writing.

    Where the hell do Rocky Racoon and Maxwell's Silver Hammer suddenly come from? His chance to do his thing?

    Like two different people. Or more.

  • i dont believe any of this 'Paul is dead' bullshit- but i must admit, these rotten apple things are really addictive....

    i just dont believe there is one person who could write/sing/look/act/play exactly as James Paul McCartney...no way.

  • true...it is a load of crud, but it sure does creep me the heck out

  • I love the beatles.

    One reason is the mystic songs ^^ But i dont belive that paul is dead

  • you are so right about the addictive shit. but if they got a replacement... holy shit, what a replacement!!!

  • its the same man, where would they find annyone who could sing the same, and compose just like him

  • Don't forget that long time when noone could find Paul. That's when they would of found him. In the "hidden voices" in a song you hear people talking about surgeory because his face isn't right.

  • ok, but what about the voice, and the composition style,im a musician, and its no easy to imitate someones style

  • Well technically maybe. But the real Paul had a great rock n roll voice and could also sing Yesterday with feeling. Let's see Faul belt out Long Tall Sally anywhere near as good even in his prime. Everything Faul sings is soft, but Paul had much more range.

  • Are you people serious?

  • those picture were less... advanced? and the new ones were maybe...more advanced? plus, if someone did replace paul he wouls have had it made, fame, fortune-and a new name, but if paul did die... we have been all been living in a paul mccartney less world :'( HOLD ON RINGO!!!

  • "Hold on Ringo" - a GREAT line - made me laugh out loud!!

  • Look at his teeth over the years they didn't change one bit and how would this replacement play and sing great songs exactly like paul did. There are so many "clues" that are ridiculous. Heres a new one for you maybe John and George are alive and Paul and Ringo are dead? maybe they've been fooling us this whole time

  • **** Look at his teeth over the years they didn't change one bit ****

    Really? Are you his dentist?

  • He chiped a tooth once, look at RAIN video , u can clearly see

  • he was in a moped accident

  • You realize that nostrils flare when one smiles and contract when the mouth is pulled down . . .

  • You would have to be a complete retard to believe any of this. Fucking idiots.

  • Well, I want to thank both of you for signing your name anyway.

  • Great job, iam. I'm very happy to see that you are using some of my comparisons. Keep up the good work !

  • You can hear What you want to hear .

  • FattyMcbitchtits: Are you blind? How can you look at the final two shots, which are comparisons of two covers that mirror each other---taken only about eight years apart--and still think they are the same man?

  • Because they are the same man.

  • are video 24?

  • i don't believe it but you make good vids

  • "turn me on dead man"... I mean number 9... number 9... :p

  • Another good video.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more