Added: 1 year ago
From: ScienceTV
Views: 276,711
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (882)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • believe it or not, this is about as much as relativity can be dumbed down. if you can't understand this then I'd say physics isn't your thing.

  • @mmamilano no i just watched a different video that i understood talking about this, it doesnt use stupidly long words to explain something that only needs a word thats like 5 letters long instead of 15

  • @mmamilano

    That's a little disheartening. 

  • Yeah this beats the hell out of my high school physics.

  • so by sitting still, you are actually travelling through time at the speed of light right now ?? thats SO KOOL !!

  • Ni se puede viajar en el tiempo como muchos quieren viajar al pasado.viajar a la luz solo implica q tardaras menos tiempo.logico si voy corriendo avanzo el tiempo que si lo caminara.

  • I love all the physics thats on youtube now, it's so awesome!! :D

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Mindraker1 that's not even what this video is saying. It's more-so saying that time is just relative or your frame of reference (position and velocity), and you could have multiple times.

    That all said, I don't think too many people have trouble understanding1 time, but that the apparently location of the sun in reference appears in a different location.

    Sure there are the dummies that think [slowly] flying around the world time travels, but it's mostly the completely ignorant.

  • :D I have no idea what's going on.

  • 3:50 simple to explain, but briliant in concept.

  • worst video, drop dead fucking explains as much as 1 line of text. asshole

  • Comment removed

  • An astronaut at rest on Earth has a heart rate of 70 beats / min. When the astronaut is travelling in a spaceship at 0.90c,

    a) what will be the rate as measured by an observer also in the spaceship ,

    b) an observer at rest on Earth ?

    Can someone explain to me, how to define which time interval is dilated time or proper time for each cases?

  • Comment removed

  • Using the cars as an example is smart. Helped me understand.

  • Another source told me that if we were able to travel as fast as the speed of light then we would have traveled forward in time. Now this is saying time would stand still? I am confused. Can someone help me?

  • RON PAUL 2012

  • @zcarver25 YES YES YES

  • @zcarver25

    He can't win don't jizz yourself.

  • Great video. Explained my theoretical physics course understandable :)

  • For anyone who doesn't believe this all I can say is to go to Stanford University's youtube and watch the lectures on special relativity, then work your way around from there, if you're not lazy, you'll start to understand.

  • I think that we have it all wrong. The universe is maybe more simple than we think or it is beyond what we will ever understand. Just like how a snail will never understand what is a sandwich. We can always look for the truth, but a 5 digit IQ genius would have to appear or if god existed, would have to reveal his most kept secrets. Personally, I think it is more simple than Einstein's relativity, that it does'nt make sense that time has a dimension. That the speed of light is like the speed o

  • Why would time go perpendicular??

    No one is changing the speed of light no matter what direction it will go.

    All it does is reach for a greater distance.

  • This is dumb. Especially with a car. 100m/h means you you will drive 100 miles in an hour. Sit in your car n drive a city..

    Why don't you put a regular good all metal clock that runs without batteries on your time space ship n see if it works.

    Another thing... Why would light change speed in dependence of another object movement??

  • @itrsk You completely misunderstood this video, check your facts, its all true my friend.

  • how can motion effect time?

  • I like strawberries

  • @Bobby21497 Me too. What a small world it is. :3

  • Einstein's relativity is in question now that the neutrinos are said to travel faster than the speed of light at CERN, one all is repaired, they will travel faster with the formula ideas given by ancient astronauts from the maya civilization that used to be here on earth 3000 years ago.. alien technology is being shared now...

  • @theideagirlsays There was a wiring problem at CERN(do you read?). Scientists were also well aware of a 1987 Supernova observed simultaneously with 2 dozen antinuetrinos that indicated that even over thousands of light years neutrinos do not outrace light. Your videos are QUITE strange by the way...

  • @MrSamySara yes theres 2 wiring problems at cern which i address in latest videos (i did some updates) and one will make neutrinos go slower than speed of light, the other.. faster.. T2K experiment 2 weeks ago mid feb 2012.. posted faster than the speed of light.. now our heads can all spin some more LOL

  • @theideagirlsays you sure are american....such bullshit wtf ...

  • @matakos22 i beg your pardon i'm canadian EH ;) lol

  • Again would anyone Please gimmie a thougt about SUPERCRYSTALALIGMENT aint that nice?

  • Here is another weird theory.Don't try this at home lol.

    If you were able to create a loooooooooooooong cable and connect the earth and the moon with that cable.What do you think would happen lol.

  • @kamikza0Lobby Stupid!

    

  • @kamikza0Lobby it would strangle an asteroid

  • Sorry i just make up ideas, hope it helps someone lol.

  • For example just like in normal life(if you start running on a straight line, your brain thinks that you are running on a straight line, but it's not a straight line.You are basically rotating just like when you get lost in woods or sahara , you will still get back from where you started.

  • It's not really like the clock rotation can't really explain but there are(in each rotation there is a pause between each rotation, but is barely visible)

  • I Think most people are missing the point of speed of light and funny all ideas and examples I'v seen are based on single line, i mean like we travel in speed of light in one direction.I have a theory which differs from single line.Well is very simple because it was always in front of your eyes(my theory was the clock movement)So basically like the clock rotation works, we can implement the same idea.Instead of moving in one single line, we can travel in rotation just like the clock does.

  • @Fordragon It's my belief that the heat and light we observe on earth is a result of the sun emitting a non observable wave. Like a sound wave. When that wave hits the ground than light and heat appears. No heat or light is observed until a mass is involved. The surface of your skin is warmer than 2 feet in from of you. The light originates from the ground not the sky. Light does not travel it appears. A laser can not be seen going towards the target. It can only be seem coming away from the ta

  • E = mc^2

    Energy = A Number

    A Number = Energy

    Energy is not a number.

    Energy is the ability to do work.

    "There is no energy in matter other than that received from its environment."

    Dr. Nikola Tesla

  • If you went back in time and killed yourself... 0.o

  • @wildoaklane3 that's a paradox; if you went back and killed yourself, you wouldn't exist in the future to go back

  • @themermaidgirl247

    The fastest way to go back to the future would to stand still in space ( not on earth beacause it is constantly moving) so get a space ship, wait a full year without moving and youll be about 370 days older instead of 365 since all of your spacetime movement is in time. But I think Einstein has it all wrong. He was proven wrong on the fact that light is the ultimate speed. So his space time either doesnt work or you can go back in time.

  • @humanstupidty CERN hasn't provided ample proof that the speed of light has been broken. Also, time travel to the past opens up the possibility for all sorts of fun paradoxes.

  • @falubii what would u do if u would go back? would u intentionally create paradoxes?

  • @humanstupidty To truly do such a thing you would need to exit the bounds of our universe, since gravity's effect on matter is boundless.

    Leaving earths orbit does not preclude you from movement, for you would either be A: orbiting the sun, B: orbiting the galactic center (if outside solar system), C: Orbiting the galactic cluster's center of gravity, and so on. Even out between galactic clusters, you would still be drawn towards the nearest, largest mass body.

  • @humanstupidty

    There are many well known phenomena that can travel faster than the speed of light, but relativity still holds up because it is impossible to transmit information FTL.

  • @CupCakeArmy1 When you say phenomena that travel FTL are you referring to things such as the propagation of gravity, the quantum entanglement of electrons, etc?

  • @Fordragon

    Pulsars:

    universetodayDOTcom/49646/fast­er-than-light-pulsar-phenomena­/

    Cherenkov Radiation(not technically faster than c, but faster than light would normally travel in water)

    en.wikipediaDOTorg/wiki/Cheren­kov_radiation

    Neutrinos(pretty new, not yet confirmed, may be result of faulty equipment)

    news.sciencemagDOTorg/sciencei­nsider/2012/02/breaking-news-e­rror-undoes-faster

    Sending light backwards in time:

    rochesterDOTedu/news/showDOTph­p?id=2544

    Quantum Entanglement:

  • @CupCakeArmy1 Would Quantum Entanglement count as "traveling" FTL? The reaction takes place before light reaches the opposing particle, but I thought that both particles having the same quantum state makes it to where nothing has to actually travel between them. I had it explained to me as "if you were holding a galaxy-wide metal rod, and you moved it on one side, the other side would move as well." Isn't it just an instantaneous reaction to an action on the opposing end?

  • @CupCakeArmy1 Also, that neutrino example has always seemed a little weird. They used a relativistic system to measure the difference of distance traveled between a neutrino and light, right? That seems like there would be plenty of room for error.

  • Comment removed

  • WTF is he talkin about

  • Not confusing. Trivial

  • Wait a second... If we had to go faster than light to travel backwards, then how fast do we have to go to get back?

  • @themermaidgirl247 you cant, right now we are going at less then the speed of light, cuz everything is moving even when you try to stand still without breathing you are still moving, even statues move, now since we are going at less then the speed of light then we are going to the future, if we are going faster then light we would be going back in time which means you are actually going backwards, meaning that you CANT go faster then light, its the limit in our universe.

  • i cant over the fact the the video material is extremely faggot

  • So say for example i Moved at the speed of light at went back in time around 1940s and i killed hitler then went back to 2012 what will happen... This is a mind fuck

  • @xxxCHASEyourDREAMxxx

    If you killed Hitler before WWII began, then you would have had no reason to time travel, since you wouldn't even know who Hitler was in the altered timeline. It's a paradox.

    Something closer to the end of the war... and you might end up as the "real cause" of Hitler's death, rather than suicide as historians believe. You would be the only one privy to this knowledge, naturally. A sort of loop in time, a time traveler was always meant to kill him.

  • @xxxCHASEyourDREAMxxx

    Good point.Here is one theory.

    For example if u did manage to get around 1940 and killed Hitler, assuming u did that.

    But when u get back probably the 2012 would not be as you left it lol.

  • very poorly explained. you can't really reach a mass audience with a video like this which is the whole point of videos like these. I feel like its things like these that deter society from science and why they deem it to be boring and confusing

  • @333irani333 these videos are for physics students

    if it was aimed at the general public, they'd say the usual things about time being bent.. with no real explanation... including lots of flashing lights random placed here and there... with random shots of things happening in everyday life to mesmerize the idiots lol

    I think that the explanation is just about sufficient.. but it makes me ask more questions about it, which is kinda annoying

  • great my head exploded and now i have to duck tape it back up again -.-

  • i dont get it.

  • why did those ships look like the klong bird of prey from te old star trek serires rofl

  • If the Blakes 7' Liberator and Star Trek's Enterprise had sex, the result would be the spaceship in the video.

  • Although traveling into the future is theoritically possible. It is imfact impossible to travel backwards.

  • Wtf

  • Too loud BG music.

  • Too loud BG music.

  • Too loud BG music.

  • depending on the "state" of the beholder as it where and also ha seeing that C is a constant about the only constant speed that is why not call it zero

  • I mean NFS should have developed a game like that.

  • if you could travel at the speed of light or faster which would be backwards in time, Can you escape a black hole using these speeds??

  • @zulu23100 Firstly, no matter can reach the speed of light - it is impossible under general relativity. But, if you could travel faster than light then the chances of escaping a black will improve. But it depends on how far down the gravity well you are!! The further down you are the more likely you will end up like spaghetti!!!

  • @CosmeticBeautyClinic It appears tath light trvavels at the speed of C= 300000 kmp that beeing the ultimate speed okay so far so good but light can be calculated as beeing particles (or a wawefunction if wou will) now matter would reach a energy of infinity if traveling at the speed of ligth still seeing that light can be defined as particles ergo having mass still light can do what only lhigt can do and on a slightly quantum mecanical level light can be a particle or wawe

  • i like how a bunch of people keep talking about the nice voice of the narrator just because it's connected to an attractive 3D model. lol, losers

  • waths whith all the jazz ? fellow human beings, I would like it if "we"could try and compile all the ideas that we have. like why not ? PS GOD bless Ye all. I am propably getting my self into trouble but C=0. C beeing the so called "speed of light HA man am I gonne get it

  • Say wut

  • If light traveled to infinity Einstein could have been right, but is not! By experimenting airplane movement  you cannot possible prove gravity travels 186,000 miles per second, even though we know that is the fact of artificial energy movement the one we call electricity. What evidence do you have gravity travels the same speed? Time dilation & length contractions it might be real but doesn't explain how gravity travels & what speed?

  • @Levon9404 i have a question for u: how d u explain that u can link two places in the universe at a faster speed than light?

  • @hegemoniuspiper Gravity force obviously! Each planet has its own gravitational force & speed of the gravity goes according the size of the inner core. However stars they have the largest inner cores with the fastest gravity speed, lot faster than 186,000 miles per seconds imagine reaching the end of solar system less then 5 second. If I get chance for debates I will open the doors of heavens for all human kind. I'm that sure of what I know.

  • @Levon9404 what u say it's interesting and i look forward to debating it, but first dont forget the gravitational pole idea belong to newton's physics not quantum mechanics! second, that no one can claim to know all or having grasped the whole implications of relativity figures! Btw, think better on my answer, take the two farest points in the universe, how come u can link them in less than a blink of an eye?

    As Einstein showed, first comes the figure then the numbers

  • @hegemoniuspiper I'm not saying Newton is completely wrong, some of his explanations are very accurate. Gravitational poles are one of them. My strongest side is the gravity. How gravity builds planets or stars & how it functions. Also I will explain why we have so many different chemical compounds. How living things formed I mean the living cells. I will insure you is not because space bends, most of the space whatever is visible to us field up with molecules.

  • @hegemoniuspiper Any energy is not acceptable to molecules they are forcing away just like tiny mirrors. We have good example within our atmosphere. How I was able to know there is no atmospheric pressure. Visually we can see atmosphere is in constant in motion. Each molecule forces gravity away, gravity has no effect on them but it does on us it passes through us. But there is more to it I will explain that to.

  • @Levon9404 what do u know about time expansion?

  • @hegemoniuspiper As long as space still produce energy everything is visible to us it will expand. Just think of human being if we don't eat what will happened to us we will lose weight right, or die. Energy within the universe is not any different energy need reinforcement to grow. Because we are part of the universe & we act like a energy to.

  • @hegemoniuspiper @hegemoniuspiper I've read about this in an article about the holographic universe. It has something to do with tests done by Alain Aspect.The results have been further investigated by David Bohm and Karl Pribram. Michael Talbot based a book called the holographic universe on the findings of Bohm and Pribram.

    If you're interested the article is written by Fred Burks and can be found on wanttoknow.info

  • @bazz0308 good point dude. There r different scenarios and most definitely we got to check it all. Some says that gravity actually evaporates into another dimension

  • @hegemoniuspiper Thanks man! We will never know what knowledge the future will bring us!!

  • @bazz0308 that's the right attitude! We build the knowledge step by step with a further inlook and a broader outlook, and setting new goals for our human development

  • Comment removed

  • @hegemoniuspiper Tell me what is your intentions doing research about the Bermudan triangle is it purely scientific or there is something evil behind it? Trying to create super weapon or make the plains super fast & invisible? I know truly what is happening there but if you are not scientist & you're not residing in US I won't share any of it with you. Possession of that kind of knowledge in the hands of evil leaders like North Korea or Iran it can be very dangerous to human kind.

  • Comment removed

  • @hegemoniuspiper Look I'm not faggoting around & have no intention doing so. That time tunnel forms because earth's crust interfere with gravitational force. Because of it gravity goes in circular motion. You may went through that tunnel but you still don't understand what is the cause. I will insure you it is possible artificially create that kind of tunnel that my concern. But only within earth's surface or atmosphere!

  • @Levon9404 second, ur way of reasoning is what is dangerous for human kind: u believe in war and in fear. Third: what u said is nothing but a pile of pseudo scientific hypothesys which have no value but in ur dreams.

    Forth: I dont like debating with retarded, go back and study some proper physics before threatening others with ideas that would pretty belong in the same form to some talk show.Go praise the atomic bomb and go fuck off in ur country

    Then u ll figure out what knowledge is

  • @hegemoniuspiper I'm not sure of your age but you have no fucking idea what you are talking about. Einstein encourage US government to build nuclear bomb. Look at the results like disease spreading all of over the globe. There are to many people on earth still have subhuman mentality. I will encourage you for you learn more of physics obviously there are lot more you still don't understand.

  • Comment removed

  • @Levon9404 And you are one of those subhumans Mr Levon!

  • @MrApplesucksass If that will make you feel better to call me subhuman so be it! Guys you want my knowledge but you don't want to face me? I feel that kind of disrespectful toward me. I deserve some recognition too. I'm willing to show you all my work with evidence & obtainable facts.

  • @Levon9404 People only get rcognised if they are right... You have no proof

  • @MrApplesucksass I'm not going to show any of my work through youtube. You want fact you have to face me is that simple. I have good news for you. I found professional book writer the one will help me write the book make sure no body will complain about the grammar. Than you will see how much of prove I have. 

  • @Levon9404 I look forward to seeing that book then. Enough meaningless arguments! Tell me what you know!

  • @MrApplesucksass Atoms true function, what truly atoms look like & how they formed. How planets or stars formed & how they are functioning. How planets produce lava how stars produce heat. What is gravity, how gravity works, what force the gravity to move. What kind of energy produce living cells. What kind or how we can build space ships to travel lot faster than speed of light.

  • @Levon9404 Thats cool... but where is your proof?!

  • @MrApplesucksass Again you want to see my work you have to face me. I won't even hesitate explain things front of whole lot of people. Because what I know is the only way universe works. I have all the evidence & actual facts. My explanations will go how atoms formed always to the point how they become stars or planets. I told you many time it will be impossible short way explain all that because everything are linked together.

  • @Levon9404 I can't come and see you face to face, so just put it all into a video!

  • @Levon9404 if somebody is foolish enough to attack your "grammer" instead of your ideas then let it be on them I think theyre scared HA HA prove me wrong if you can. not you but any idiot out there that thinks "grammer" is more important than actuall ideas you morons

  • @58NIEL by the by gimme a buzz ? 

  • @58NIEL Sr. you have no idea how much does guys attack me for my grammar. I told them the same thing if they are concern more for my grammar than my discoveries, let them go & be English teacher. Because my science knowledge better than theirs.

  • @Levon9404 One day I would really like it if you would share your ideas seeing thath Ive got my own HA ! thath will be the day. anyways stay safe with friendly regards Niel

  • @58NIEL Believe me that is my goal as soon as I find out with who I'm communicating with. Does guys keeping hidden them self from me but they want me to open my knowledge to them. I don't know why they are hiding from me. Faster they show me with who I'm communicating with faster I will explain them my discoveries.

  • @Levon9404 SHUT DOWN UR ACCOUNT

    And hei, carefull I HAVE SEEN PAGES ABOUT PHYSICS ON THE INTERNET AND MANY OTHER THINGS

  • But is there something else equal to the speed of light? Does everything that causes light have the equal speed of light?

  • I suspect that matter is related to light because it is made of light. That idea is more than two hundred years old and there has never ever been even one piece of experimental evidence that it is not so.

  • I get the moving through space and time part... kinda... Very interestnig

    @callawaydekluizen yeah, you could say that again. Or maybe the movement of the speech through time and space would mess it up =S. xD

  • well all i know, einstein was one smart noodle :)

  • Really Confusing

  • @LeadingWay Tell me about it

    

  • swag

  • I wonder why nature has these physical rules....its like it's conscious of these phenomenon and how they can mess things up. Like time travel paradoxes and other phenomenon of witch there are an infinite amount. Its amazing.

  • this is retarded, they didn't justify why the speed of light is the maximum speed, some crap about time relativity, made no sense even if it was traveling like the graph shows who says the graph is correct! lol! how do they determine that? wow!

  • as soon as i become all smart, ill build a time machine, go back in time, then tell einstein to get a hair-cut!...

  • 215,721Views24/Jan/2012

    Nice voice, nice background music, nice graphics, nice hypnotic image flow speed.

    To bad the scientific information he's putting out is BS [bad science].

    The speed of light is a (constant) to be put into equations & calculations.

    The speed of light is not (a limit) of speed, it's an equation (constant).

    He [nice voice narrator] makes us think that the speed of light is some sort of limit and that is false.

    Reference:

    The Resonance Project (Nassim Haramein).

    Do good.

  • @EveSansdieu I agree with friendly regards Nille in the house

  • @EveSansdieu The speed of light is a limit, and also a constant, no object of Matter(Has mass) can ever go faster then the speed of light, as defined by e=mc^2. Because as you approach the speed of light the object gains an infinite amount of mass, which then requires a infinite amount of energy to continue to accelerate the object, which is impossible. Therefore the speed of light is the max velocity that can ever be achieved in life, other than some and other sub atmoic particles.

  • @EveSansdieu "He [nice voice narrator] makes us think that the speed of light is some sort of limit and that is false." False. The narrator is only giving you facts about Einsteins special/general theory of relativity (confirmed by: the atomic clock and plain experiment).

    Now I could buy a DVD from this Nassim Haramein guy (of whom i have never heard of) for $20 a pop, or I can just get the information from the greatest minds in the scientific comunity for free.

  • @EveSansdieu You should not call this bad science when you cite another version of space-time which is not generally accepted by the scientific community - that's just bad manners!

    The fact is that the speed of light (which is only constant in a vacuum) is assumed to be an upper speed limit by Einstein in his theory of general relativity. However, every experiment since his assumption has shown that it is a correct assumption (unless those neutrinos from CERN did travel faster than light!).

  • @CosmeticBeautyClinic there's something about using relativity to disprove relativity that just doesn't strike me right. i wonder why.

  • @arzolezzi08 Eh? What do you mean?

  • @EveSansdieu you have issues man! Trying to understand is actually better than criticising bro and God bless you! Your friend, Time

  • @EveSansdieu I concure as always whith friendly regards 

  • @EveSansdieu According to special relativity, c is the maximum speed at which all energy, matter, and information in the universe can travel. It is the speed of all massless particles and associated fields—including electromagnetic radiation such as light—in vacuum, and it is predicted by the current theory to be the speed of gravity (gravitational waves). Such particles and waves travel at c regardless of the motion of the source or the inertial frame of reference of the observer.

  • @EveSansdieu I hope youre not another conspiracy theorist

  • just about everything was said in thie video was wrong.

  • that's not what happens when you move at the speed of light or the C in E=MC2

  • @Storyteller3010 look here, im gravity, i travel at the speed of light, i fiogured out that if you travel at the speed of light shit starts comming near you,,,

  • @iamgig9876 time travel isn't what happens when you travel at the speed of light.+ figured <-- that's how you spell figured.

  • @Storyteller3010 i did not ever say that... im still gravity and you probably didnt know gravitys speed before i said it...

  • the ship travels at light speed how long would the.clock.on.other ship.stops, a mere second

  • @JstaGoodoBoy01

    So if you did want to go see the dinosaurs, you could try to enter another parallel universes were the dinosaurs still exist. however, good luck getting back your your own original universe from were you came from because your chances of returning to your original universe are 1 in infinity.

    you would be hoping from parallel universe to parallel universe hopelessly trying to find your way back to your original universe with your chances being 1 in infinity of doing so.

  • @JstaGoodoBoy01

    Speed of Life, What?

    It is impossible to back in time with in our own universe, however consider the idea of multiple parallel universes splitting off from each other into infinite and in these universes, anything that can happen,will happen and is happening is happening all at the same time.

  • @DeaddudeRS I meant speed of light, idk how i ended up typing "life" lol

  • does this mean that they stay shortened???

  • I dont think if one could build a spaceship that travels faster than the speed of life, given possible, then one could walk amongst the dinosaurs.

  • @JstaGoodoBoy01 speed of life lol, but ur right, to travel at the speed of light would mean your mass would also be infinite. not very logical

  • @o0o0styx what makes you think its true?

  • @creedrituel its in the maths. the universe makes better sense in mathematics. m(2)=[m(0)]/[root(1-(v^2/c^2))­; regardless of initial mass, to reach the final velocity of 'c' would equate to a singularity.

  • @JstaGoodoBoy01 I'm not certain that a speed that's greater than the speed of light could ever exist. It might just be that it's the absolute maximum speed ever to exist. They also refered to it in this very video as the highest speed available. Given this is the case, then no, we can't. If there is no actual limit, then we might achieve that, given enough time.

  • @thekorw the CERN labotory actually accelerated neutrinos to travel some few nano seconds faster then light/photons

  • @JstaGoodoBoy01 Actually, they miscalculated the speed of the neutrinos particles. Since the GPS satellites are affected by the gravity of the earth, time moves at a different rate for them, causing their readings to be slightly high. The neutrinos actually were 2 nanoseconds slower than light.

  • @JstaGoodoBoy01 Well, there you go! I didn't know that.

  • What?

  • ferdi well ye all love to hear all your strange ideas about it all be good and stay out of trouble friendly regards and so forth Niel

  • I think that the speed of lhigt=0 and matter has a expansionrate (of C in so called time but not in space) ha ha no affence to no one I just think : matter moves thru space Lhigt does not

  • Awesome video. Thanks.

  • The video itself lacks any charisma to it...It's just-plain boring.

    For some reason...I just don't find this theory important at all,Time is just measuring the Action,and space is the container of existence...which is basically just something that "allows" energy and material and other things to pass through it,Thing with vast action will measure less amount of time passing,while things with less action,simply Don't move much,therefor more time pass-you can even notice it in the act of Boredom.

  • @Wharwulif That is also happens that if you Freeze a watch,there won't be any time or action at all...for you deprive the material out of energy or "action" giver,making the time passing there to be small in such a way that if you were awakened within that ice,a second in a non-freezing place,will pass in a ridiculous amount of time in the freezing place.

    The time factor does not matter here-it's the action of material+energy that gives the illusion of time.