Wow, light saber.
kazearaki 1 month ago
Either tell your case in English, or leave it be. Very difficult to follow as well as boring and completely lacking an intelligent response to potholer54's video. Nothing but babble here folks and not a single shred of counter-evidence offered.
LordSauceness 11 months ago 5
Why do these people believe in stone-age myths while seeing it as acceptable to use the internet? Go live in a mud hut, you lazy hypocrites.
EddieTheFishReturns 1 year ago 3
Can you talk a little bit quicker? Other people could explain twice as much in half the time.
bicsc7 1 year ago
The Argument is not whether the flood was local or global. The argument is whether or not the flood happened at all.
This argument has been resoundingly lost by the pro-flood lobby. They just don't realise it yet.
HonestMan395 1 year ago 3
If there was a flood at all, it was local in scope. Just what the rocks say, and they have no agenda.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago 2
Wow, light saber.
kazearaki 1 month ago
Either tell your case in English, or leave it be. Very difficult to follow as well as boring and completely lacking an intelligent response to potholer54's video. Nothing but babble here folks and not a single shred of counter-evidence offered.
LordSauceness 11 months ago 5
Why do these people believe in stone-age myths while seeing it as acceptable to use the internet? Go live in a mud hut, you lazy hypocrites.
EddieTheFishReturns 1 year ago 3
Can you talk a little bit quicker? Other people could explain twice as much in half the time.
bicsc7 1 year ago
The Argument is not whether the flood was local or global. The argument is whether or not the flood happened at all.
This argument has been resoundingly lost by the pro-flood lobby. They just don't realise it yet.
HonestMan395 1 year ago 3
If there was a flood at all, it was local in scope. Just what the rocks say, and they have no agenda.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago 2