P&G is not a bad company but maybe they should keep and eye on some managers, specially Maureen O Shea (P&G Spain).
Some months ago, on my way to university I heard a boy talking to a friend and briefing. Maureen came as a new manager, and she didn't want him to continue. The reaons are long hair, he studied in a public university. Even his supervisor confirmed that. There's nothing to do with crisis. At least 3 new employes have been recruited (private universities, upper class, etc.
this thing of holding the soap or bottle in my hands is similar to a fire in a cave with two wet stones.. I am really waiting (this to have my next shower) a container connected to the shower itself and simply twisted it do-not soap leak in my justone.. there is already something stupid but good enough to start this project and is a filter for the shower with I do not know what funny stone any way it is on sale at JR and it is only useful as part of this more needed project.
Maraming mga trabaho upang gawin sa mga paulit-ulit na proseso sa sa maliit na kuwarto para baguhin o pagpapabuti, pabayaan mag-isa bagong pag-iisip and what we broadly call innovation.
P&G products are priced high! The have been contributing to Conservative political groups per local Cincinnati News sources. The bottom line is while P&G employees are doing well, many of us are sucking it up and see our benefits like Social Security at risk due to the Conservative/Tea Party ideals. I think P&G needs to consider if they are wise supporting the politics of the rich.
This is the guy pushing for a drop in the corporate tax rate without touching any of the very generous loopholes and shelters enjoyed by US corporations. Supposedly it's to 'remain competitive,' but their competitors are taxed at the same rate. You can be sure they're cooking their books too, which is much easier to do in the USA than other countries. In short, he wants to have his cake and eat it, with the government/its people left to make up the shortfall. A right wing corporate stooge.
The fact is that more than 600 companies manufacture safe and effective products that are comparable to Procter & Gamble's WITHOUT TESTING ON ANIMALS. When I called the company to ask if they tested on animals Jose LIED and said they didn't. Not only do they kill thousands of animals, but they LIE about their products.
I work for P&G and have never once seen evidence of animal testing. If it still occurs, animal testing is most likely performed by contractors outside of the US.
Check out The underlying law of nature. Bing it. Discovered relatively recently, it is possibly the world's most useful knowledge. One of countless reasons–its understanding and application is the most effective and efficient means of improving the performance of any process.
@lion6965 P&G is not a bad company but maybe they should keep and eye on some managers, specially Maureen O Shea (P&G Spain).
Some months ago, on my way to university I heard a boy talking to a friend and briefing. Maureen came as a new manager, and she didn't want him to continue. The reaons are long hair, he studied in a public university. Even his supervisor confirmed that. There's nothing to do with crisis. At least 3 new employes have been recruited (private universities, upper class, etc.
I do not shop of anything made by proctor and gamble. The products i use are cheap as i can use little of (cleaning products etc..) and works even better and its better for the environment.Hundreds of thousands of animals are put in tiny cages in poor environments, tested on n then killed! And people support this for their own vanity? To me this just not seem moral? So yeh people give me the thumbs down 'cos at least im not sick to torture animals.You buy this you support that!Think about it?x
Are you crazy? P&G does not test on animals and you have no idea what you are talking about. You should do your research first. before making a remark like that.
@MissAnnoymous I totally agree with you. The disasters of procter and gamble are known across the world... I come from italy, a bit distant from usa, but even here some people say NO to their products.
yeh i agree i wouldnt touch product and gamble!!!! i duno why everyone is giving ananya7 thumbs down!!!! they kill animals and put them through a life of misery!!! its a disgrace!!!! Boycott!!!
Each year, thousands of animals die in Procter & Gamble laboratories -- the victims of painful, archaic and entirely unnecessary product tests. Caustic chemicals are forced into the eyes of rabbits and applied to animals' shaved and raw skin.
Laboratory workers place the animals in restraining devices so they cannot struggle while the workers apply the chemicals, which burn into the animals' eyes and skin.
Animals sometimes break their necks or backs attempting to escape the pain.
i have potential. i was working for P&G with adecco. i was sick of it so i quit my job to start my goal. is to find and meet a billionaire. so if i can get the help great. but i would like to be a billionaire at 25 im 22 so i know that i think like a billionaire. and the 4 years i work there i was thinking. the most thinking was in tide to go. so im going to make a change one way or an other.peace out
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
everybody with a conscious will boycott procter and gamle. they test their products on animals, tying them down and putting chemicals in thier eyes to "test the product" this is despicable, in-humain and down right disgusting! screw you procter and gamble
P&G its time to look up and see out to space there is more we can learn and made the biggest change in are world. oya im bigger then a customer. im a invention for the future i think
I admire A.G.'s perspective on innovation. However, I think CEO's role as a CIO, though important as it is, does not guarantee success of this practice in a big organization, especially if someone somewhere in the power hierarchy blocks this flow of practice. Just my 2 cent thought.
I can say that his practise is really a true reality within big corporations. however, a lot is lacking in service innovation. A truly differente approach.
P&G is not a bad company but maybe they should keep and eye on some managers, specially Maureen O Shea (P&G Spain).
Some months ago, on my way to university I heard a boy talking to a friend and briefing. Maureen came as a new manager, and she didn't want him to continue. The reaons are long hair, he studied in a public university. Even his supervisor confirmed that. There's nothing to do with crisis. At least 3 new employes have been recruited (private universities, upper class, etc.
coladoleon80 1 month ago
this thing of holding the soap or bottle in my hands is similar to a fire in a cave with two wet stones.. I am really waiting (this to have my next shower) a container connected to the shower itself and simply twisted it do-not soap leak in my justone.. there is already something stupid but good enough to start this project and is a filter for the shower with I do not know what funny stone any way it is on sale at JR and it is only useful as part of this more needed project.
truemayalink 1 month ago
Maraming mga trabaho upang gawin sa mga paulit-ulit na proseso sa sa maliit na kuwarto para baguhin o pagpapabuti, pabayaan mag-isa bagong pag-iisip and what we broadly call innovation.
StroonsGlen 2 months ago
Great!
katheryncruz24 2 months ago
Protector and gamble definitely do not innovate.
CreditRatings101 3 months ago
Anyone likes free money Got to: bit.ly\nDdQ3N Thumbs up if you like free money
annaleewzpw 3 months ago
Corporate greedy mother fuckers, occupy your mind!
End P&G!
AnnMoyous 3 months ago
P&G products are priced high! The have been contributing to Conservative political groups per local Cincinnati News sources. The bottom line is while P&G employees are doing well, many of us are sucking it up and see our benefits like Social Security at risk due to the Conservative/Tea Party ideals. I think P&G needs to consider if they are wise supporting the politics of the rich.
nhb1234 3 months ago
This is the guy pushing for a drop in the corporate tax rate without touching any of the very generous loopholes and shelters enjoyed by US corporations. Supposedly it's to 'remain competitive,' but their competitors are taxed at the same rate. You can be sure they're cooking their books too, which is much easier to do in the USA than other countries. In short, he wants to have his cake and eat it, with the government/its people left to make up the shortfall. A right wing corporate stooge.
greyareaRK1 5 months ago
what was the new product they spent 12 years to develop and they were about to launch at that time?
eduseve97 8 months ago
@eduseve97 anyone know? I would love to know too
antonylin123 1 month ago
so uselesss believe me does not worth
tazebitty 9 months ago
what a wonderful leader
TheApplepie1970 9 months ago
Comment removed
ciaoearth 10 months ago 5
SATAN HAS YOUR FACE
SrtaMisifu 11 months ago
I sit down to watch this video, and all of a sudden I crave a muffin and a cup of coffee
This video remind me of being back in college
CathyCorlleone 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Marginal value naughty Russian ladies here gettop5.info
AlexisSirscu 1 year ago
The fact is that more than 600 companies manufacture safe and effective products that are comparable to Procter & Gamble's WITHOUT TESTING ON ANIMALS. When I called the company to ask if they tested on animals Jose LIED and said they didn't. Not only do they kill thousands of animals, but they LIE about their products.
tinkysaweet 1 year ago
Procter sucks, they blind idtheir workers taking them while they are in the University, fortunately I quit and look the real horizons out of Procter.
nombredeusuario1423 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice stuff, I love the effort. Watch new music video of BRANDON JAROD,wow!
11181001 1 year ago
what's the most innovative product which you said towards the end of the video? is that out yet?
nikwason 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikwason 1 year ago
I work for P&G and have never once seen evidence of animal testing. If it still occurs, animal testing is most likely performed by contractors outside of the US.
CupOfPens2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISCOVERED in the 21stC: The Underlying Law of Nature.
The underlying law of nature may be the world's most useful, profitable and encouraging knowledge.
The top 3 General Characteristics of The underlying law of nature are:
#1. The Way of All Things
#2. The Basis of All Laws and Principles
#3. The Basis of All Health, Growth, Efficacy and Efficiency
Google it – as a start.
The empirical process for identifying the underlying law of nature was discovered in 2008. Soon we may all do so.
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
i hate you
xblondbimbox 1 year ago
STOP TESTING ON ANIMALS, STOP WITH YOUR SLAVERY, STOP ALL!
ladydamasco 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out The underlying law of nature. Bing it. Discovered relatively recently, it is possibly the world's most useful knowledge. One of countless reasons–its understanding and application is the most effective and efficient means of improving the performance of any process.
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
P&G is satanic according to wikipedia
darthsophia123 1 year ago
@darthsophia123 hahahahahahhaa... good source.
carlillos18 1 year ago
Free LOTTERY taking place at this site - freelotteryformoney . com [New $100 CA$H winner every 3 days!]
ttechfs 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The most useful question ever, is
What is the underlying law of nature?
Be among the first to identify, understand and apply its answer. Why?
1. It is the way of all things. (observable)
2. It is the basis and absolute reference frame of the principles of thought, intelligence, communication and logic.
3. It made possible the formulation of these four principles.
4. Conscious use of these principles permit efficacy and efficiency to multiply in business and life.
Google it, as a start.
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
Comment removed
mattawake 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
excellent work!
1888junkteam 2 years ago
Great company. They have really done a lot for society.They treat their employees with dignity and respect.
lion6965 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lion6965 P&G is not a bad company but maybe they should keep and eye on some managers, specially Maureen O Shea (P&G Spain).
Some months ago, on my way to university I heard a boy talking to a friend and briefing. Maureen came as a new manager, and she didn't want him to continue. The reaons are long hair, he studied in a public university. Even his supervisor confirmed that. There's nothing to do with crisis. At least 3 new employes have been recruited (private universities, upper class, etc.
coladoleon80 1 month ago
I do not shop of anything made by proctor and gamble. The products i use are cheap as i can use little of (cleaning products etc..) and works even better and its better for the environment.Hundreds of thousands of animals are put in tiny cages in poor environments, tested on n then killed! And people support this for their own vanity? To me this just not seem moral? So yeh people give me the thumbs down 'cos at least im not sick to torture animals.You buy this you support that!Think about it?x
MissAnnoymous 2 years ago
Are you crazy? P&G does not test on animals and you have no idea what you are talking about. You should do your research first. before making a remark like that.
famousbamis12 2 years ago
@famousbamis12 maybe YOU don't know what you are saying... everybody knows that they test on animals, as THEY had said it many times.
ladydamasco 1 year ago
@MissAnnoymous I totally agree with you. The disasters of procter and gamble are known across the world... I come from italy, a bit distant from usa, but even here some people say NO to their products.
ladydamasco 1 year ago
Great interview.
One of the top influences for my ongoing assignment!! Thanks a lot HBS.
tobias987654321 2 years ago
Stop killing and testing animals!
mayestico86 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I hope that man dies of testicular cancer. Anyone that buys P&G is just as sick as those that work for them and maim innocent animals.V I L E.
SuperJimmehJism 2 years ago
i think i love this guy... maybe i should be working for p&g
ahmedriaz 2 years ago
it is, cuz on the 1851 logo they had a man on the moon with 13 stars, & the critics later then claimed that the stars connected to form "666" ha....
jjld90 2 years ago
PG is the best!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GDavidson87 2 years ago
@GDavidson87 p&g is the best because they don't care about environment an tests on animals? oh yes, i think that they are the best in doing this!
ladydamasco 1 year ago
proctor and gamble is a stupid satanist company so they dont care if they test on animals there sick *****
calebbj 2 years ago
yeh i agree i wouldnt touch product and gamble!!!! i duno why everyone is giving ananya7 thumbs down!!!! they kill animals and put them through a life of misery!!! its a disgrace!!!! Boycott!!!
lauralush04 2 years ago
fate schifo! bastardi!
d3v0tchK4 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
sengulo 10 months ago
Seriously FUCK proctor and gamble! Sick bastards! , animal testing freaks ,,
djkfdhfhl 2 years ago
Hello,
Thank u for this....really i learned some..:)
edenzigo 2 years ago
Fucking P&G!! Death P&G!!
rejar 2 years ago
Thank you A.G. - Gene
GenericGene 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Each year, thousands of animals die in Procter & Gamble laboratories -- the victims of painful, archaic and entirely unnecessary product tests. Caustic chemicals are forced into the eyes of rabbits and applied to animals' shaved and raw skin.
Laboratory workers place the animals in restraining devices so they cannot struggle while the workers apply the chemicals, which burn into the animals' eyes and skin.
Animals sometimes break their necks or backs attempting to escape the pain.
jfneon 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
proctor and gamble, test products on animals! never use their products!
ananya7ananya 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
procter and gamble give big donations to the satanic church of sanfrancisco.time to boycott ,everybody.
becerra333333 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wow....your strategies are known worldwide.i have a question for you- now what's your innovation regarding this??????????
garimabangur 2 years ago
wow your strategies are known worldwide.i have a question for you- now what's your innovation regarding this?????????
garimabangur 2 years ago
damn you drink to much lmfao
daisycutter71 2 years ago
manda cojones la broma...
sergyo88 2 years ago
i have potential. i was working for P&G with adecco. i was sick of it so i quit my job to start my goal. is to find and meet a billionaire. so if i can get the help great. but i would like to be a billionaire at 25 im 22 so i know that i think like a billionaire. and the 4 years i work there i was thinking. the most thinking was in tide to go. so im going to make a change one way or an other.peace out
korndog86 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
everybody with a conscious will boycott procter and gamle. they test their products on animals, tying them down and putting chemicals in thier eyes to "test the product" this is despicable, in-humain and down right disgusting! screw you procter and gamble
llamahamfat 2 years ago
WOW dude u are really retarded
minizer999 2 years ago
how so bitch?
llamahamfat 2 years ago
This is a completely different decision making process compared to the Cisco way of John Chambers....
evowo 3 years ago
P&G its time to look up and see out to space there is more we can learn and made the biggest change in are world. oya im bigger then a customer. im a invention for the future i think
korndog86 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Video. Check out TubeViews (dotnet) If you need your video exposed, It has really helped me a bunch. Be blessed!
THIS WORKS! Its amazing.. THANK YOU SO MUCH DUDE!!!!!!
chandrhdfr 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
devil
ullyannafunayama 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
exemple mad man of world
ullyannafunayama 3 years ago
I admire A.G.'s perspective on innovation. However, I think CEO's role as a CIO, though important as it is, does not guarantee success of this practice in a big organization, especially if someone somewhere in the power hierarchy blocks this flow of practice. Just my 2 cent thought.
kashiko123 3 years ago
I can say that his practise is really a true reality within big corporations. however, a lot is lacking in service innovation. A truly differente approach.
mbcavalcante 3 years ago
very interesting insights and practice. cannot agree more.
tom25442000 3 years ago