This was such Bullshit! She probably didn't even drive. Americans didn't have a clue about truth in advertising (still don't). There is no such thing as truth in advertising.
I own one. Love this car. it will munch a Honda. Big, comfy & inexpensive. We get over 20 on the highway. Fully recycleble with soy based plastics & no 800lb toxic batteries
If I knew I had to experience a crash at over 20MPH in either my 2.1-ton 1953 Buick Roadmaster or my 1800-lb. Honda Fit, I'd take the Fit, hands-down, because I want to live.
...Compare that with today: most cars are treated as just appliances, they all look like jellybeans, and seem to come in about 5 body and 2 interior colors (shades of black or gray), BUT often reach 100K or even 150K w/o major concern (if you're a Honda owner!); even the cheapest are loaded with power gadgets, A/C, stereos, etc., and are at once VERY maneuverable and VERY safe compared with '50s cars, and get double the mileage, to boot. They are highly-engineered products of a different era.
I've got my '53 Roadmaster almost restored. Only 0.45% (one per 222) U.S. cars had factory A/C in '53 -- and only Packards, Caddies, Buick Supers and Roadmasters, and the top-line Olds. Technology has come light years since then -- most cars were only meant to last 5-8 years, tho hopefully in the form of biannual styling changes coupled with aggressive advertising would have you trade-in a car with only 25K mi. after 3 yrs. Hardly any got past 50K w/o serious issues, most were junked by 75K.
Vinton Hayworth represented Buick in the three minute "intermission" spots during the 1953-'54 season of 'THE BUICK-BERLE SHOW"; Jack Lescoulie became Buick's announcer the following season.
Great commercial. Thanks for showing it. But I was wondering if the original air date is wrong. The Buick in the commercial is a 1953, but the date you posted says Dec. 1953. By that time, the 1954 Buicks would've been selling.
@ZiuoxZui My source for the date was IMDb (based on the guest-stars on that episode of "The Buick-Berle Show"). But they may be wrong again (they didn't even have a listing for hated yet long running 50s kids show "The Magic Clown" until I submitted one to them)
I had the four-door model of the 54 Special. Mine didn't have the factory air, but it had an automatic, power brakes, power steering and a tube radio. Built like a tank, hell yes! I got rammed from the back. I got a dented bumper, the other guy's hood looked like an accordion.
@Sheri451 Are you nuts or just ignorant? They were built like tanks, not soda cans like Hondas, Toyotas or Datsuns, uh Nissans. They had air conditioning and seat belts. There was no need for airbags since they were built to take a beating. And not all the tiny teens were screaming down the streets at 100 mph. How would you explain so many of these older cars are still on the road? My '53 Buick is worth more than a rice rocket any day of the week. How many 30 year old Hondas do you see?
@customcruiserroy I am ignorant. I am 47 years old, I know older cars were built better than the crap they are building now, all they have now is a bunch of plastic, thats why they need air bags and things in them but the older cars needed seat belts. The shoulder ones PLUS the lap belts which they had then. Don't be so hateful the next time.
This was such Bullshit! She probably didn't even drive. Americans didn't have a clue about truth in advertising (still don't). There is no such thing as truth in advertising.
Handiman544 5 days ago
Hey it's Uncle Milty!
tripleJ1955 1 week ago
I own one. Love this car. it will munch a Honda. Big, comfy & inexpensive. We get over 20 on the highway. Fully recycleble with soy based plastics & no 800lb toxic batteries
Inkjet2 2 weeks ago
If I knew I had to experience a crash at over 20MPH in either my 2.1-ton 1953 Buick Roadmaster or my 1800-lb. Honda Fit, I'd take the Fit, hands-down, because I want to live.
50zcarsman 1 month ago
...Compare that with today: most cars are treated as just appliances, they all look like jellybeans, and seem to come in about 5 body and 2 interior colors (shades of black or gray), BUT often reach 100K or even 150K w/o major concern (if you're a Honda owner!); even the cheapest are loaded with power gadgets, A/C, stereos, etc., and are at once VERY maneuverable and VERY safe compared with '50s cars, and get double the mileage, to boot. They are highly-engineered products of a different era.
50zcarsman 1 month ago
I've got my '53 Roadmaster almost restored. Only 0.45% (one per 222) U.S. cars had factory A/C in '53 -- and only Packards, Caddies, Buick Supers and Roadmasters, and the top-line Olds. Technology has come light years since then -- most cars were only meant to last 5-8 years, tho hopefully in the form of biannual styling changes coupled with aggressive advertising would have you trade-in a car with only 25K mi. after 3 yrs. Hardly any got past 50K w/o serious issues, most were junked by 75K.
50zcarsman 1 month ago
What was the MRS of this car in 1953?
hoosierdaddyinsfca 2 months ago
ah the 50's age of comformity. and spoiled brats...
carlosb1 2 months ago
Vinton Hayworth represented Buick in the three minute "intermission" spots during the 1953-'54 season of 'THE BUICK-BERLE SHOW"; Jack Lescoulie became Buick's announcer the following season.
fromthesidelines 3 months ago
dang those car weight like 2 tons
TheAndrewscape 3 months ago
Great commercial. Thanks for showing it. But I was wondering if the original air date is wrong. The Buick in the commercial is a 1953, but the date you posted says Dec. 1953. By that time, the 1954 Buicks would've been selling.
ZiuoxZui 5 months ago
@ZiuoxZui My source for the date was IMDb (based on the guest-stars on that episode of "The Buick-Berle Show"). But they may be wrong again (they didn't even have a listing for hated yet long running 50s kids show "The Magic Clown" until I submitted one to them)
MattTheSaiyan 5 months ago
I actually remember this commercial when I was a child.
1518karen 5 months ago 2
I had the four-door model of the 54 Special. Mine didn't have the factory air, but it had an automatic, power brakes, power steering and a tube radio. Built like a tank, hell yes! I got rammed from the back. I got a dented bumper, the other guy's hood looked like an accordion.
Bogframe 7 months ago
Just bought a 1950 Buick Super. What a cool car.
Inkjet2 9 months ago
@Inkjet2 the best looking year. I think the grill makes it great.
masterjedi89 7 months ago
I love classic American vehicles, from late 60's to early 70's muscle to classic style of this beauty, cheers from Texas !
SpaceAceTX 11 months ago
I wish I'd seen this earlier , I just bought a Car C.
notmrjohn 1 year ago
Oh yes, no seat belts, no air conditioning. No air bags. That was the good old days, you could get killed in one then
Sheri451 1 year ago
@Sheri451 there better than your crappy little honda, btw cars have had airconditioning since 1947, and yes it was a buick
GOLDIELOCKS1993 1 year ago
@Sheri451 Are you nuts or just ignorant? They were built like tanks, not soda cans like Hondas, Toyotas or Datsuns, uh Nissans. They had air conditioning and seat belts. There was no need for airbags since they were built to take a beating. And not all the tiny teens were screaming down the streets at 100 mph. How would you explain so many of these older cars are still on the road? My '53 Buick is worth more than a rice rocket any day of the week. How many 30 year old Hondas do you see?
customcruiserroy 11 months ago
@customcruiserroy I am ignorant. I am 47 years old, I know older cars were built better than the crap they are building now, all they have now is a bunch of plastic, thats why they need air bags and things in them but the older cars needed seat belts. The shoulder ones PLUS the lap belts which they had then. Don't be so hateful the next time.
Sheri451 11 months ago
The AUTO-mobile showroom! LOL!
meggiemeown 1 year ago