If the shells are supposed to just melt away as we increase atmospheric CO2, then why have coral reef extension rates increased since the 1700's? Shouldn't they be going down?
3) Yes, since such creatures get their calcium from the water,if there is less of it in the water,there is less to work with
But concluding bleaching of corals or thin shells on "Ocean Acidfication" is moot without checking for other factors like local sea rise causing migration or sickness/deformaties in the test subjucts
2) eee... But the Oceans aren't just salt and water with co2 being introduced to it
It also has various other minerals....one in particular,calcium,likes to interact with CO2 and turn to "sand stone"
The removal of calcium from the ocean chemistry via excess co2 causes a Alkanizing effect,not a Acidfying one
Lower PH by volcanic vents and near areas where toxic waste and sewage is dumped into the oceans have more obvious on spot explainations for the local low PH
1) So 5000 trillionish tons of air can actually effect the CHemistry of 300 million trillion tons of water?
The average ppm of 390ppm (actually varies from 0-900ppm depending on wind,tempature,humidity and altitude..constantly) actually comes from the evaporation/percipitation cycle out of the ocean which sinks in the thousands of trillions of tons in the water and thousands of trillion tons more in the deep sea which is getting warmer thus more co2
p.s. the 390ppm average suggests 1.5 trillion tons of co2 in 5000 trillion tons of air of which 500 billion was supposedly added by humans in the last 50 years
The Coean estimated 790ppm is against 300 million trillion tons of water...so the supposed rise caused by "Big oil" making too much profit is actually a few thousand trillion tons more then then humans could have "made"...but could easily be dislodged from it;s "co2 hydrate" stores in the deep sea by volcanic and earthquake activity
I'm glad you made this video. This message is a difficult, but important one to convey. However, I cannot see the demos at all and there are a lot of mis-spellings in the subtitles!
@fiodinea But they correctly spelt the word Pteropod. What I think proves this video is nonsense is they show just 1 pteropod. But that proves there is only 1 pteropod. If it dies nothing is going to happen! Even if the worst happens & a few billion people die, well we can blame that on globalisation. The more people lifted out of poverty, the more people & the more burning. The REAL future problem is not starvation & death & extinctions. But border protection. Politics? What a joke we humans.
Just as the Hypothises of Anthropologocal Global warming is a "Predictioon" by observing co2 rise and tempature rise (why no meters out of cars and factory stacks to link co2 to humans?) they have a Hypothises from observing thinning shells and Co2 rise that it is because of "co2 acification" of the ocean
Next step in the Scientific Proceedure is Verification/testing then Falsification
@TheRealArchAngel Oh no you don't. You see, a) I trust there are REAL experts who are better than me. This happens in almost every aspect. Science, art, medicine, law, music. b) These expects, no doubt they are your "betters" as well, have already done/cpmpleted the testing & verification. c) They also inform us that the SUN, an ordinary run of the milll STAR, is getting hotter. A hundred million years ago more CO2 was needed to set the temperature. d) Don't become a slowly boiling frog-man.
"I trust there are REAL experts who are better than me."
At what?
"These expects, no doubt they are your "betters" as well, have already done/cpmpleted the testing & verification."
No they didn't otherwise they wouldn't think/claim 1.5 trillion tons of co2 in 5000 trillion tons of air could raise thousands of trillions of tons of co2 in 300 million triilion tons of water a few thousands of trillions of tons more (the math doesn't add up)
As long as the ,er, "experts" are using the Scientific Method proper the will eventually rediscover that 18th century GHG theory was upsurped by Evaporation/percipitation in Meterology and the Thermalhyline cycle in Ocenagraphy with observes heat disapation and distribution
They'll also redisvcover Vulcanology knowlegde of Earth's Core heat regulates climate through Geology's Plate tectonics via plumiong(warming)&waning(Ice Age).not a trace gas
But then again US has fell behind in Science and Mathamatics ever since the "Liberal Infiltration" in to the poublic schools and most collages in the 70's after putting a man on the moon in the 60's with "fringe technology" the space shuttle (late 60' tech)doesn't even have
Why would a University Physist working in a University lab or Government lab need to know anyhting of Ecology,vulcanology,Geology,meterology,Oceangraph?
All they need to do misquote Svante's "cause of Ice Age(lack of co2)
The only truly honest statement in this demonstration was "the oceans will never be this acidic"
elomb06 1 week ago
I like It
profesorbl 1 month ago
Good Video I like It
puyolmencaribl 1 month ago
Nice Video I like and Lovely
porbyza 1 month ago
Good, thanks for shared
TheJatmikoo 1 month ago
If the shells are supposed to just melt away as we increase atmospheric CO2, then why have coral reef extension rates increased since the 1700's? Shouldn't they be going down?
beefy256 3 months ago
Cool story bro.
MrHav1k 4 months ago
3) Yes, since such creatures get their calcium from the water,if there is less of it in the water,there is less to work with
But concluding bleaching of corals or thin shells on "Ocean Acidfication" is moot without checking for other factors like local sea rise causing migration or sickness/deformaties in the test subjucts
TheRealArchAngel 7 months ago
2) eee... But the Oceans aren't just salt and water with co2 being introduced to it
It also has various other minerals....one in particular,calcium,likes to interact with CO2 and turn to "sand stone"
The removal of calcium from the ocean chemistry via excess co2 causes a Alkanizing effect,not a Acidfying one
Lower PH by volcanic vents and near areas where toxic waste and sewage is dumped into the oceans have more obvious on spot explainations for the local low PH
TheRealArchAngel 7 months ago
Hoily FLying Spegetti Monster.Seriously?
1) So 5000 trillionish tons of air can actually effect the CHemistry of 300 million trillion tons of water?
The average ppm of 390ppm (actually varies from 0-900ppm depending on wind,tempature,humidity and altitude..constantly) actually comes from the evaporation/percipitation cycle out of the ocean which sinks in the thousands of trillions of tons in the water and thousands of trillion tons more in the deep sea which is getting warmer thus more co2
TheRealArchAngel 7 months ago
p.s. the 390ppm average suggests 1.5 trillion tons of co2 in 5000 trillion tons of air of which 500 billion was supposedly added by humans in the last 50 years
The Coean estimated 790ppm is against 300 million trillion tons of water...so the supposed rise caused by "Big oil" making too much profit is actually a few thousand trillion tons more then then humans could have "made"...but could easily be dislodged from it;s "co2 hydrate" stores in the deep sea by volcanic and earthquake activity
TheRealArchAngel 7 months ago
Skip to the demo at 5:05
supadupagmailcom 10 months ago
this lady? haha. Dr. Lubchenco is a genius and she has does so much for the scientific community. who cares what her voice sounds like
Tconn625 1 year ago
my biology professor is making me write a paper on this. although it's an interesting topic, this lady's voice makes me sleepy.
SoThenSimonSaid 1 year ago
@SoThenSimonSaid
Dr. Sawicki?
DCDunaway84 1 year ago
Reminds me of Colin Powell's presentation to the UN on WMD's. This is in the same gendre.
delbekew 1 year ago
Outstanding video. This message needs to get out........
bothromo 1 year ago 5
I'm glad you made this video. This message is a difficult, but important one to convey. However, I cannot see the demos at all and there are a lot of mis-spellings in the subtitles!
fiodinea 2 years ago
@fiodinea But they correctly spelt the word Pteropod. What I think proves this video is nonsense is they show just 1 pteropod. But that proves there is only 1 pteropod. If it dies nothing is going to happen! Even if the worst happens & a few billion people die, well we can blame that on globalisation. The more people lifted out of poverty, the more people & the more burning. The REAL future problem is not starvation & death & extinctions. But border protection. Politics? What a joke we humans.
listen2meokidoki 9 months ago
" think proves this video is nonsense"
Be-Have
The video is a demostration of the "Prediction"
Just as the Hypothises of Anthropologocal Global warming is a "Predictioon" by observing co2 rise and tempature rise (why no meters out of cars and factory stacks to link co2 to humans?) they have a Hypothises from observing thinning shells and Co2 rise that it is because of "co2 acification" of the ocean
Next step in the Scientific Proceedure is Verification/testing then Falsification
TheRealArchAngel 7 months ago
@TheRealArchAngel Oh no you don't. You see, a) I trust there are REAL experts who are better than me. This happens in almost every aspect. Science, art, medicine, law, music. b) These expects, no doubt they are your "betters" as well, have already done/cpmpleted the testing & verification. c) They also inform us that the SUN, an ordinary run of the milll STAR, is getting hotter. A hundred million years ago more CO2 was needed to set the temperature. d) Don't become a slowly boiling frog-man.
listen2meokidoki 7 months ago
"I trust there are REAL experts who are better than me."
At what?
"These expects, no doubt they are your "betters" as well, have already done/cpmpleted the testing & verification."
No they didn't otherwise they wouldn't think/claim 1.5 trillion tons of co2 in 5000 trillion tons of air could raise thousands of trillions of tons of co2 in 300 million triilion tons of water a few thousands of trillions of tons more (the math doesn't add up)
"co2..temperature"
Earth's Core regulates climate
TheRealArchAngel 7 months ago
"Don't become a slowly boiling frog-man."
As long as the ,er, "experts" are using the Scientific Method proper the will eventually rediscover that 18th century GHG theory was upsurped by Evaporation/percipitation in Meterology and the Thermalhyline cycle in Ocenagraphy with observes heat disapation and distribution
They'll also redisvcover Vulcanology knowlegde of Earth's Core heat regulates climate through Geology's Plate tectonics via plumiong(warming)&waning(Ice Age).not a trace gas
TheRealArchAngel 7 months ago
But then again US has fell behind in Science and Mathamatics ever since the "Liberal Infiltration" in to the poublic schools and most collages in the 70's after putting a man on the moon in the 60's with "fringe technology" the space shuttle (late 60' tech)doesn't even have
Why would a University Physist working in a University lab or Government lab need to know anyhting of Ecology,vulcanology,Geology,meterology,Oceangraph?
All they need to do misquote Svante's "cause of Ice Age(lack of co2)
TheRealArchAngel 7 months ago