END AND CLOSING OF THE 900 MILITARY BASES AROUND THE WORLD.
BRING TRILLIONS HOME.SHRINK OF GOV BY 50% ...THE SMALLER THE BETTER FOR EASY GRAB BY THE PEOPLE WHEN NOT DOING A GOOD JOB.END OF THE IRS= MORE MONEY IN YOUR PAY CHECK. END OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE (THEY HAVE STOLEN 97% OF THE DOLLAR VALUE)
"The alternative would be free markets." I do so wish that Ron Paul were president.
Central planning, overprinting of currency, and socialistic ponzi schemes have destroyed the economies of so many countries, and yet now we have an anti-American Marxist in the White House who supports all of these.
@Linguiphile Everyone I talk to wants Ron Paul as president I just dont understand this Huge roadblock is it that the American people are zombies and need to wake up? Is it the Media Is the Government Brainwashing us? Ron Paul is my Hero!! 2012 has to be when the people wake up or it is gone
why do these fuckin networks bring people on, talk to them for a couple minutes and when things start getting good, they fuckin cut em off. Stupid ass networks
A Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich administration would bring a true constitutional republican upholding the constitution and a true social liberal who cares about all americans. This will create a centrist coalition, made of right left and center which will move this country forward, and solidify the US as the leader of the world. Just my humble opinion.
@ printing money reducing currency value, watch Season 2 of Metalocalypse when Nathan Explosion becomes gov of FL. More money is printed, made absolutely worthless, etc.
I like Dr Paul for the simple fact that he may have looked at this reporter's or even hotter vagina! Finally he is being recognized for his great work as a congressman and his time in the trenches. I suggest people read Dr Paul's lesser known book that he wrote during his tenure as an OBGYN. The jury is out on how Dr Paul's book titled "End the Fuzz" didnt recieve the attention that his "End the Fed" title did. Perhaps using the pen name Pull-Out-Paul never caught the attention of backers
A vote for a libertarian presidential candidate is a vote that would have gone to a Republican. A libertarian candidates has nearly zero chance of winning but he or she could certainly fix it so that the libs win the white house again.
@esj8341 I used to believe as you do. I am a conservative. After careful research and learning over the last year I have to say Ron Paul is the next Reagan. He is right on 100% of the issues. He is by far the smartest man in Washington. We need him to reverse the damage we have had since 29'. He can do this in probably a 2 term stint. If he is left alone and the American people can get on his intellegence level. He is a great great American. I know he says stuff that makes Conservatives Part1
There is much to like about Ron Paul's record on domestic issues. However, I don't see how you can compare him to Regan on foreign issues. Regan's peace through strength and Paul's non intervention position are diametrically opposed.
@esj8341 That is a very plausable point. However, I will remind you that Reagan opened talks with Russia. Tough talks but talks nonetheless. It, through strong negotiations worked. I believe that is the engaging that Paul also advocates. I do not think he is a roll over like a Dem is. So, on the surface he and Reagan would look different. In all actuallity they are alike. I strongly believe Reagan would not have gone into Iraq.
@esj8341 cringe. Hate to admit it. But he is right. He is right about the war, (Reagan and Goldwater would agree), he is right about the Fed. He is right about the indusrtrial military complex ( Eisenhower warned us). And here is the biggest one of all. He is 1000000000% right about the UN and the NWO. He is are only hope. And I mean that. Without us going to war against Washington literally? It's him! He is it! Our very last hope!
@esj8341 The idea of taking away votes from the republicans by voting libertarian is an idea that needs to be squelched or we will never change anything. The two party system needs to go and with your ethic it never will. Look at things now with Obama. Does it really feel any different than with Bush? If we have a reactionary vote and bring in another republican patsy things will stay the same. But if we get a 5% vote for a libertarian then funding kicks in and we might make some serious inroads
I am sorry but I don't share your personal opinion about the two party system.
Multi party systems requires coalitions. And coalitions break easily and often and then paralyze the government. I much prefer our two party system.
I much prefer reforming the Republican party than dividing the Republicans and libertarians the result of which would mean four more years of tax and spend.
@esj8341 They are already divided. We haven't had a real republican get close to winning since Goldwater. That's the issue. The neocons don't care about us because if they did our country would be a completely different place. I think you really need to consider where your loyalties lie. Is it with the people or a broken party? The people get manipulated EVERY time they vote and that's why things never get better. Our only shot is to vote for a "nobody" who hasn't been soiled.
If a real conservative does win office he will have an uphill battle.
Real damage has been done by Obama.. Entitlement programs do not die nor will the hundreds of agencies that Obama and his Dem Congress have created. Any move by the Rep to even reduce the rate of spending increases for entitlements will be vilified by the dems, the press, and the large numbers of Americans addicted to entitlements.
@esj8341 Good point about Obama and the nation's love of entitlements but you don't take it far enough. No matter who wins the presidency, nothing ever gets repealed. None of Clinton's legislation like nafta and cafta got repealed by Bush. He added to these with the security and prosperity act.(NAU). Obama hasn't gotten rid of the patriot act or homeland security like he said he would. And if we get a conservative for president, the health care bill won't be repealed. It's all contrived.
@esj8341 Any conservative who makes it into the presidency will keep the overall agenda rolling. The government has no real power and anyone who gets voted in to a high office will be completely bought and paid for. We have a puppet government that puts us last. That's why reform will never work. The people are too stupid to realize that the faces they see the most on T.V. to vote for are our enemy. So the country will continue on its downward spiral. Sad but true
@esj8341 obviously not every single one but most are. Candidacies are paid for. Look how much Obama has received from BP for instance. You don't think these people get into office of there own accord do you? They are basically reps for large companies.
IS IT TIME?! Go to USRevolution2 (dot com) and get your flag of the Second American Revolution. Theyre made in America and look exactly like the flag of Betsy Ross with a Roman numeral II in the center of the 13 stars. This flag is now in all 50 states and spreading from porch to porch. They make great gifts for family, friends and recovering Liberals.
In a state of tranquillity, wealth, and luxury, our descendants would forget the arts of war* and the noble activity and zeal which made their ancestors invincible. Every art of corruption would be employed to loosen the bond of union which renders our resistance formidable. When the spirit of liberty, which now animates our hearts and gives success to our arms*, is extinct, our numbers will accelerate our ruin and render us easier victims to tyranny.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom—go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!--SAMUEL ADAMS
Audit the FRB and you will see why those bitches need to be eradicated. The fall of the FRB would be the best thing to happen to this country since the signing of the Declaration and Bill of Rights.
Man, Doesn't all that clear, simple speech just warm your truth loving soul??? She was like " But,,, but what should we do OH NO the economy" and he was like "Why do we need SO MUCH government?!?" Stop trying to DO so much and just let us Americans do what we do best, live produce and grow. if you haven't seen Fall of the Republic freshen up on your economics and give it an evening of your family's time.
And the family homicides-suicides continue every day in the country due to financial crisis, desperation is taking people to take this horrible measures, what is needed to wake up?, Y talk to people wherever I go and they don't care to take action and do something!
@MystiK570 To say Ron Paul for King is like saying Jesus for King... He doesn't want to rule the kingdom, he wants to give the kingdom to the people...
The world currency is on the table. Their testing it electronically.
These ppl operate slowly.
The enemy is Rothchild/Zionists. Their hands are in the Vatican, other countries, the 14 Federal Reserves in the US. England/British empire of course. Illuminati/Freemasons. its them. Alright I got to eat breakfast. not many understand me anyway. Its like this is a journal entry/cry for help I'm probally complaining, but I think they should be brought to Justice.
Hmmm.... What can i say? Ron Paul is right and been right for decades. So what else is there to say? Just be like Jim Cramer go buy some washington mutual stocks.
Reporters just don't seem to be smart enough to deal with questions other than the 2 choice questions they are trained to ask. "So do you think we should do this, or do you think we should do that?" And if the answer they get reveals that the alternatives they offered stem from what the interviewee views as a basic misconception-well, mental agility is lacking. They think they didn't get an answer, and have to force the guy to commit to fall into one of the limited categories they started with.
Why is the reporter looking so sarcastic or having that asshole face. She doesn't know shit. Ron Paul knows what needs to come, her dumbass is working for these corrupt dumbasses.
I think it was because he always answers sincerely with alot of info, which isn't a bad thing, but you can see the impatience in her face because he wasn't giving her shorter answers. He makes sure that the people watching are getting the info they need to understand what's going on and not act like every other politician out there that thinks ordinary Americans are experts in economics and political matters...at least that's how I see it. He could make a 10 year old understand! xD
Rockefeller greenspan etc. took a lot of property basically through a big scam, why does everybody recognize these takeovers as they were legal? Couldn't you just take back your property under the name of sane and moral thinking? through their scam-policies and "laws" they willfully killed numerous people by taking property and waging wars. How can they get away with all of this and they are still continuing, they are people as well, they aren't anymore special in anyway. any thoughts?
That news anchor was so dumb. I'm a 19 year old pizza delivery boy and I understood why our economy sucks, who is to blame, and what is the solution. Either she's playing dumb or she is dumb. Both aren't to the viewer's benefit
HR1207, the bill Ron Paul presented to audit the FED is gaining traction. That will at best raise awarness. While the Fed is unconstitutional, it is legal. Some of the money they print replaces old money, but most of it is new money that lowers the value of the dollar causing inflation. The 700 billion for 1st bailout was appropriated as Congress voted on it. What about the countless dollars that the FED has put into global markets with no appropriation? We have to End the FED!
Article 1, Section 8 of US Constitution gives the power the Fed holds to Congress. Most of congress does not understand the system. I think before the FED can end a lot of congress will have to be educated/replaced. Along with the money printed, the false low interest rates set by the FED is part of the current problems. The Federal Reserve Act is written such that not even the President can change it. watch?v=3QkmLnNEvdU All central banks before the FED had to get renewed or were temporary.
It is the nature of the Constitution to change, and it has many times before. The FED was unconstitutional when the Act passed 12/23/1913. I agree with your comment that it is hard to pin down one event, but my prior points are relative. Your comment of written so long ago really bothers me, as it implies the states cannot amend the document, or that it should be ignored. The FED concerns me in that not even the President can answer to them, as spoken by the former chair. watch?v=3QkmLnNEvdU
Some of the money the FED prints replaces old currency, most of it is new & lowers the value of the dollar & causes inflation. The low interest rates, set by the fed over the recent years have added to the debt the gvmt owes. I find it ironic we have come out of Wars Declared by congress (legal wars) richer than undeclared. We actually got back on a gold standard after WWII, and had to get off it again after Vietnam. I am not saying an immediate return to gold is the answer. HR1207 is a start.
I dont see any reason why the value of dollar should not go down. I support the gradual devaluation of dollar over a period of time.
I want to see it devalue against foreign currencies so we can significantly close the long running trade deficit and may be someday have trade surplus.
I fear the dollar will continue to be worth less, compared to other currencies, as it has over the past five years. We have become a nation of consumers, and lack manufacturing. We need to find ways to cut spending, yet increase manufacturing. We should have let the market correct itself rather than nationalize our way into socialism. We have yet to see anything really positive come from any of these bailouts other than more dependence gvmt.
By the way, I simply disagree that you can devalue your way to prosperity via relative deficit rates. I understand the point, but disagree, as I think a strong currency is better than weak. I do admit I could be wrong. It just seems backwards, but I understand the logic, I just disagree.
As of October 2008 Canada was the largest trading partner of the US at just over 500 billion $ for the year 2008.
Do you know why Canadians fear when the value of Canadian $ goes over 80 cents to a US $. They lose comparative advantage which means it makes their exports expensive.
It is natural that a US company will come to Canadian manufacturers rather than buying same products from US manufacturers because the buyer will save 15-20 cents in each dollar it spends because of $ exchange rate.
That might be true, but we buy so much and depend on other currencies, so that would only backfire making us have to pay more, or inflate prices for the things we buy at the grocery store in America. Not to mention all the unbalance that is already there in our trade with other countries. It would only hurt the citizen, and their savings, not to mention the value of their paycheck.
I meant to say we depend on products from other countries, so a week dollar hurts the American citizen at the grocery store and shopping everyday, as everything is imported. It also hurts savings. I meant to say countries, not currencies, but basically same point. A weak dollar is not good for the American.
If I were a Canadian manufacturer supplying goods to US companies. I would want the value of Canadian $ to stay low and the US $ to go up because my goods will become cheaper to the US buyers due to $ exchange rate My competitors in the US offering the very same goods in the US will surely be hurt and lose the market share. Which means my factory will keep humming and my employees will keep earning their pay checks while exactly the opposite will happen to my US competitors and their employees
I know we expect when exchange rates go down, the trade should go up, but it does not always happen. The fact is our trade surpluses are long gone, and we are left with all these trade deficits. History indicates when we had a surplus in trade, we also had a strong dollar, so I am reluctant to devaluing the dollar as a plan. I think you have some good points, but I maintain that less spending and cuts in gvmt are required for real change. In either case I support HR1207.
BTW: I want to thank you for good debate and not name calling, so common on YouTube. For that you have my respect. I will continue to learn more about economics and see if I change. I am very open minded, but troubled by the current situation. I agree with you that more people should be discussing these issues. We obviously have our differences, but we can trade comments without sarcasm and childish remarks, and that is good. Maybe some others will join in the debate.
I absolutely disagree with cutting the size of government for no reason. As the population size grows it is very logical to grow the size of government to keep it in pace with growth of population
Here is small example: As the population grows the size of students population grows at a public school. It is very logical to add new teachers by hiring to take care of growth in student population. Adding teachers means additional funding from the government which means growth in size of government.
The Federal gvmt spends more on education than any other nation, but ironically it is not reflected in performance. I value the 10th Amendment and that requires responsibility, so there has to be laws and people to enforce them. It is the Federal gvmt nationalizing & bailing out corporations that should fail that I am against, along with this Empire posture when we can't even defend our border. Consider how the Federal gvmt has had entangling alliances that have hurt us over the past 50+ years.
Of course the performance in education was not going to improve when eduction policy like "No Child Left Behind" was focused just on making kids pass a standardized test so a school can qualify for funds.
At the college level there was no point in appointing middlemen corporations like Sallie Mae just to distribute tax payer funded Federal loans for college kids so that these middlemen like Sallie Mae can gobble up over 50 billion $ over few years in their ultra-low risk loan ventures.
Remember that China is NOT our largest trading partner, it's Canada. We traded about 340 billion $ worth of goods with China in the year 2008 as opposed to 550 billion $ in trade with Canada in 2008.
Also remember than Province of Ontario in Canada is the largest supplier of manufactured goods to the US amongst all 10 provinces of Canada. Ontario has minimum wage currently set at 8.75 $ Canadian. The exchange rate has hovered at around 80-85 cents Canadian to 1 US $ in the last few months.
The legislative branch (the Congress) has control over FED not the executive branch so it is pretty natural that FED does not answer to the president.
Congress doesn't really controlled them. They have a liaison between the FED board and congress known as the chairman, but congress only recently really got involved, as far as voting when the FED started requiring hundreds of billions. Weeks before the $700 billion bailout, the FED dumped about 70 billion into global markets along with other central banks without Congress. The FED is an independent service that congress has never really audited. The FED does report to congress via the chairman.
The Congress created FED. If the Constitution does not allow the government to have a central bank then the Constitution should be changed to let the government not only have a central bank but have it under direct control of executive branch which is the case in every other country in the world.
This man is for trashing a system that does not work... I think there is some action invovled in that. He has an uphill battle in hand against our corrupt government who are just as guilty through collusion.
I agree. The Federal Reserve Act passing Congress made it legal, and that passed 12/23/1913. Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution reads that Congress has all the responsibility that was delegated to these third party bankers known as the FED. All central banks prior to the FED were temporary and had dates for review/renew. Congress is not ready to take their power back, but HR1207 is a step towards transparency. Congress never even voted on what the FED did until the $700 billion bailout.
I am referring to text that reads, To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures". That is one area delegated to the FED as some powers were also delegated to the IRS, as far as Article1 Section8. With the 16th Amendment passing in 1913, it adds some interesting aspects to debate because of the definition of the word income. That is a different topic as far as the Constitutional definition of the word income, the IRS, and the 16th.
Do any of these big investment companies, or Banks, or Car companies have any ties to congress? or the treasury? Should be a damn crime. They are just paying each other off. Congress should be burned to the ground. They don't think we know what they are doing?
Are you calling 98% of Americans stupid? I'd go with people's choice being a function of their information. Ron Paul was the guy you were not suppossed to know about. Reporters today are actors serving a boss. Ron Paul dominated the net because people are free here. This medium works well for Ron Paul the Champion of the Constitution.
Thank You Voodoo that is my point exactly. He nor anybody else without bankster, corporate and media backing stands a chance. Our Republic represents the money that puts them and keeps them in office. That should be a focus of CHANGE. The net is a much more level battlefield. One those in power will seek to overhaul because it represents unpredictability and allows smaller less connected people a larger voice.
So true. I noticed that the MSM's position on the internet is that it's unreliable or false information. They discredit it as if no truth exists here. But it's the exact opposite
What good has the FDA done and for God's sake, what good has the Dept. of Education done?? Created dumb asses like you obviously. Ever read the founding fathers?? Do you think they are insane also?? Learn history dickhead.
Can you see the confusion on that sheep of a reporter's face. She is so deep in the matrix that she can't conceive a world without the FED and its "overseeing" of monetary policy. "Well then who will oversee monetary policy?" What a sheep, what a moron, what a socialist. Has the whole country lost its mind? Has the whole country forgot about the power of free markets?!?!
"Has the whole country forgot about the power of free markets?!?!"
They scoff at the notion of markets making "natural corrections" that are for the betterment of their interests. They have been indoctrinated with the idea that free markets allow rich capitalists to steal their wealth. They believe government to be the only entity with the power to keep that from happening, not realizing that it is only the government that has the power to steal their wealth, and uses it!
I have and will continue to repeatedly challenge Obama to afford Ron Paul the opportunity to oversee the Fed. I am seriously beginning to think I am not insane in my proposal. It may be a way for the reds to realize RP really is true to them* in practice and theory. Actually, he is for ALL, and unfortunately, that is precisely what frightens the weak.
*"them" meaning what the party has ostentatiously been deemed to represent
the federal reserve is unaccountable to the population. Therefore it is a licence to steal from the population. Pass the bill to audit the reserve or be content being a slave. Bend over for your masters.
Oh the market managed the monetary policy before 1913. HA!! Read "Rise of the American Civilization" by Beard. It was a freaking free for all. Recall the guilded age? Wildcat banks? It was insane. Now the Fed and wall st went insane just on a bigger scale and stole our money. Free Market? There is no such thing. Just like communism. Free markets get corrupt just like the gov't.
The goverment, should fight the banks to get its real power. Its sad the banks own the gov the people cuz we just work for them, like no other slave day after day.
the purpose of the fight would be to resist against something that i know is evil and wrong. if i die then whatever. im going to die some day anyways. at least i took the chance of fighting for freedom. yes, that would boost my ego, but the purpose is bigger than my ego. my ego getting a boost would just be a bonus.
God dammit, is it that hard for me to live a life without being robbed?
When 95% of the population wants something, and our politicians go against our words, isn't it common sense that they are getting orders from someone else?
This is not a conspiracy theory folks. It is happening RIGHT BEFORE OUR EYES.
This is the message I am feeling from our "leaders"...
"Follow us and get us rich, or we will drive this entire country into the ground"
I saw this interview on Bloomberg live- for once they did get the texts right. Last time they "misunderstood" his message and put on a pre prepared text, claiming that "Congressman Paul calls for more regulation"..
Nice to be able to catch it on YouTube later :-). Too bad some text is blocking the Bloomberg textline, which kept updating all the way during the interview, faithfully repeating what he was saying- for once. Last time they misrepresented what he said..
to elaborate more, what ron paul is trying to do is Give america back to its people. right now the federal reserve owns each and every one of us, the united nations and international government is just as bad. they overrule domestic law. ron want to give the government, give america back to the people. the fed is not the government, its private. the "creature from jekyll island."
ron paul has an almost perfect voting record. and sure his perfect government and perfect society is pre-1913 and earlier, with complete property rights and no federal reserve and states rights...thats a good ideaology if you ask me. whos plan is better?
brilliant - he is absolutely right. in addition to what Ron Paul said, the Federal Reserve is also the secret organization. No one knows who its members are --absolutely absurd. more absurd is that we have just taken this set up for granted.
i wonder if all the talk of ending the federal reserve will help bring in a global bank that the bilderbergs have talked about for years. I hope there arent doing that. American's are just stupid enough to get rid of the fed to put in some world bank,,,,,,,,,, i hope not,, Ron Paul is my hero :D
Because people were already calling him a loon as it was. If he were to come straight out and start breaking it down, forgetabout it, people would have had everyone reason ( people being MSM ) to not put him up on stage.
No it's not. You're not factoring human nature into the mix. A system that relies on some individuals knowing and doing the right thing is flawed and unsound. Centralized government planning doesn't work because of this very reason.
That's what the market does. If you want perfection you should educate the people so they make better decisions in the market. It makes no sense that a group of individuals, whose morals and motives are unknown to us, should sit in Washington DC and manage the economy limited both by their information and intellect.
Ron Paul for President. HERES WHY: HE DOES NOT WANT TO BANKRUPT US!! YAAAAYYY!!! VOTE RON PAUL!!!!
thethinktankchannel 1 month ago
The USA has big problems because of capitalism and than they vote a libertarian? This is so ironic!!!!!
dimideluxe 2 months ago
i feel the same hype about paul like 2007 about obama. where are we now?
uncontrolable777 2 months ago
Do your part and vote for this guy! No more voter apathy, that's how we got Bush!
MrDeadmilkmen 5 months ago
WHY RON PAUL?
END OF THE CIA( DRUG DEALERS)
END OF THE POLICE STATE.
END OF THE CRIMINAL PATRIOT ACT.
END AND CLOSING OF THE 900 MILITARY BASES AROUND THE WORLD.
BRING TRILLIONS HOME.SHRINK OF GOV BY 50% ...THE SMALLER THE BETTER FOR EASY GRAB BY THE PEOPLE WHEN NOT DOING A GOOD JOB.END OF THE IRS= MORE MONEY IN YOUR PAY CHECK. END OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE (THEY HAVE STOLEN 97% OF THE DOLLAR VALUE)
DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW...WHY WE NEED RON PAUL?
Ron PAUL FOR PRESIDENT !
JUANO510 5 months ago 2
Go to AWAREOFTRUTH. COM---For an alternative view.
WESTAZTEC 7 months ago
"The alternative would be free markets." I do so wish that Ron Paul were president.
Central planning, overprinting of currency, and socialistic ponzi schemes have destroyed the economies of so many countries, and yet now we have an anti-American Marxist in the White House who supports all of these.
Linguiphile 9 months ago
@Linguiphile Everyone I talk to wants Ron Paul as president I just dont understand this Huge roadblock is it that the American people are zombies and need to wake up? Is it the Media Is the Government Brainwashing us? Ron Paul is my Hero!! 2012 has to be when the people wake up or it is gone
steveon91 4 months ago
why do these fuckin networks bring people on, talk to them for a couple minutes and when things start getting good, they fuckin cut em off. Stupid ass networks
HollywoodSheen 10 months ago
A Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich administration would bring a true constitutional republican upholding the constitution and a true social liberal who cares about all americans. This will create a centrist coalition, made of right left and center which will move this country forward, and solidify the US as the leader of the world. Just my humble opinion.
diplomats031 11 months ago
@diplomats031 Amen
GeneFerda 11 months ago
@GeneFerda Thank You.
diplomats031 11 months ago
There WAS a purpose for the Fed-facilitate government deficits, which they have done tremendously well.....not that it's a good thing
pretorious700 11 months ago
this guy is hated by the right and left because he speaks the truth!
Frogboss6 1 year ago 3
It's refreshing to hear a politician actually make rational arguments.
KerrQuanProductions 1 year ago
Alright, I'll be the one to say it. The chick is hot.
emperormai 1 year ago
@ printing money reducing currency value, watch Season 2 of Metalocalypse when Nathan Explosion becomes gov of FL. More money is printed, made absolutely worthless, etc.
RonnieAGonzalez 1 year ago
check out more on ron paul here in holland people never heard of this untold hero.
This is a champion of the people a not a puppet of the super powers trying to get a new world order.
shrappnells 1 year ago
I like Dr Paul for the simple fact that he may have looked at this reporter's or even hotter vagina! Finally he is being recognized for his great work as a congressman and his time in the trenches. I suggest people read Dr Paul's lesser known book that he wrote during his tenure as an OBGYN. The jury is out on how Dr Paul's book titled "End the Fuzz" didnt recieve the attention that his "End the Fed" title did. Perhaps using the pen name Pull-Out-Paul never caught the attention of backers
vilekyle22 1 year ago
Rockefeller OWNS US!
blackvirus9 1 year ago
RON PAUL FOR 2012!!!! FREEDOM IS CONTAGIOUS!!!
marumito 1 year ago
A vote for a libertarian presidential candidate is a vote that would have gone to a Republican. A libertarian candidates has nearly zero chance of winning but he or she could certainly fix it so that the libs win the white house again.
esj8341 1 year ago
@esj8341 I used to believe as you do. I am a conservative. After careful research and learning over the last year I have to say Ron Paul is the next Reagan. He is right on 100% of the issues. He is by far the smartest man in Washington. We need him to reverse the damage we have had since 29'. He can do this in probably a 2 term stint. If he is left alone and the American people can get on his intellegence level. He is a great great American. I know he says stuff that makes Conservatives Part1
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69
There is much to like about Ron Paul's record on domestic issues. However, I don't see how you can compare him to Regan on foreign issues. Regan's peace through strength and Paul's non intervention position are diametrically opposed.
esj8341 1 year ago
@esj8341 That is a very plausable point. However, I will remind you that Reagan opened talks with Russia. Tough talks but talks nonetheless. It, through strong negotiations worked. I believe that is the engaging that Paul also advocates. I do not think he is a roll over like a Dem is. So, on the surface he and Reagan would look different. In all actuallity they are alike. I strongly believe Reagan would not have gone into Iraq.
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@esj8341 cringe. Hate to admit it. But he is right. He is right about the war, (Reagan and Goldwater would agree), he is right about the Fed. He is right about the indusrtrial military complex ( Eisenhower warned us). And here is the biggest one of all. He is 1000000000% right about the UN and the NWO. He is are only hope. And I mean that. Without us going to war against Washington literally? It's him! He is it! Our very last hope!
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@esj8341 that line of thinking will never change anything. The lessor of two evils idea is a fallacy.
wthf5 1 year ago
@wthf5
Can you be more clear?
The lesser of two evils principal is a fallacy? Or Ron Paul and Reagan and not the same on foreign intervention is a fallacy?
esj8341 1 year ago
@esj8341 The idea of taking away votes from the republicans by voting libertarian is an idea that needs to be squelched or we will never change anything. The two party system needs to go and with your ethic it never will. Look at things now with Obama. Does it really feel any different than with Bush? If we have a reactionary vote and bring in another republican patsy things will stay the same. But if we get a 5% vote for a libertarian then funding kicks in and we might make some serious inroads
wthf5 1 year ago
@wthf5
I am sorry but I don't share your personal opinion about the two party system.
Multi party systems requires coalitions. And coalitions break easily and often and then paralyze the government. I much prefer our two party system.
I much prefer reforming the Republican party than dividing the Republicans and libertarians the result of which would mean four more years of tax and spend.
esj8341 1 year ago
@esj8341 They are already divided. We haven't had a real republican get close to winning since Goldwater. That's the issue. The neocons don't care about us because if they did our country would be a completely different place. I think you really need to consider where your loyalties lie. Is it with the people or a broken party? The people get manipulated EVERY time they vote and that's why things never get better. Our only shot is to vote for a "nobody" who hasn't been soiled.
wthf5 1 year ago
@wthf5
Reform from within.
Are you watching the news? There are real conservatives wining primaries. It's not the end of RINOs but it is a move in the right direction.
esj8341 1 year ago
@esj8341 We'll see. . hope you're right.
wthf5 1 year ago
@wthf5
If a real conservative does win office he will have an uphill battle.
Real damage has been done by Obama.. Entitlement programs do not die nor will the hundreds of agencies that Obama and his Dem Congress have created. Any move by the Rep to even reduce the rate of spending increases for entitlements will be vilified by the dems, the press, and the large numbers of Americans addicted to entitlements.
esj8341 1 year ago
@esj8341 Good point about Obama and the nation's love of entitlements but you don't take it far enough. No matter who wins the presidency, nothing ever gets repealed. None of Clinton's legislation like nafta and cafta got repealed by Bush. He added to these with the security and prosperity act.(NAU). Obama hasn't gotten rid of the patriot act or homeland security like he said he would. And if we get a conservative for president, the health care bill won't be repealed. It's all contrived.
wthf5 1 year ago
@esj8341 Any conservative who makes it into the presidency will keep the overall agenda rolling. The government has no real power and anyone who gets voted in to a high office will be completely bought and paid for. We have a puppet government that puts us last. That's why reform will never work. The people are too stupid to realize that the faces they see the most on T.V. to vote for are our enemy. So the country will continue on its downward spiral. Sad but true
wthf5 1 year ago
@wthf5
Conservatives and libs have the same agenda? The government has no real power? All politicians are bought and paid for?
esj8341 1 year ago
@esj8341 obviously not every single one but most are. Candidacies are paid for. Look how much Obama has received from BP for instance. You don't think these people get into office of there own accord do you? They are basically reps for large companies.
wthf5 1 year ago
Ron Paul,
Much love from BC
kingaj100 1 year ago
Pres. Kennedy was killed for his plans to dissolve the FR. He was one of out last great presidents
griptick 1 year ago
What's the alternative. How about we print our own money, we control our own interest rates.
Who is this woman? Is she from planet earth?
jeddah91 2 years ago
This poor cow is in way over her head as she attacks Congressman Paul with the nonsensical, usual propaganda
oldjoe5 2 years ago
Ben B. is the LOAN wolf that's not a typo.
I don't need to see the whole Balance Sheet, I'd really want to see all the Liabilities Section.
uturniaphobic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IS IT TIME?! Go to USRevolution2 (dot com) and get your flag of the Second American Revolution. Theyre made in America and look exactly like the flag of Betsy Ross with a Roman numeral II in the center of the 13 stars. This flag is now in all 50 states and spreading from porch to porch. They make great gifts for family, friends and recovering Liberals.
usrevolution2 2 years ago
Wow. Ron Paul is right!
Novaessrussia 2 years ago 2
In a state of tranquillity, wealth, and luxury, our descendants would forget the arts of war* and the noble activity and zeal which made their ancestors invincible. Every art of corruption would be employed to loosen the bond of union which renders our resistance formidable. When the spirit of liberty, which now animates our hearts and gives success to our arms*, is extinct, our numbers will accelerate our ruin and render us easier victims to tyranny.
crackerwv 2 years ago
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom—go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!--SAMUEL ADAMS
crackerwv 2 years ago
Audit the FRB and you will see why those bitches need to be eradicated. The fall of the FRB would be the best thing to happen to this country since the signing of the Declaration and Bill of Rights.
crackerwv 2 years ago
@crackerwv Bravo,
jeddah91 2 years ago
Ron Paul Is Correct !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And The Cunt Conducting The Interview Is Just That An Unknowing Cunt !!!!!!!!
lheureux 2 years ago
Can anyone name the last non Jewish Chairman of the Fed?
How about the last time all or a majority of the directors of the fed were not Jewish.
Is the answer to the latter never?
oldjoe5 2 years ago
The Fed came into being and @ 15 years later the nation plunged into the worst depression in our history
oldjoe5 2 years ago
Bish is trying awfully hard to disrespect with that little head nod she does after she asks each question.
MonopolyRSV 2 years ago
Man, Doesn't all that clear, simple speech just warm your truth loving soul??? She was like " But,,, but what should we do OH NO the economy" and he was like "Why do we need SO MUCH government?!?" Stop trying to DO so much and just let us Americans do what we do best, live produce and grow. if you haven't seen Fall of the Republic freshen up on your economics and give it an evening of your family's time.
clemsonguysc 2 years ago
Owned! The truth stings a little...
Psilo007 2 years ago 2
this country will never elect someone like ron paul. he explains common sence to the people and they dont understand
hobieslug45 2 years ago 9
And the family homicides-suicides continue every day in the country due to financial crisis, desperation is taking people to take this horrible measures, what is needed to wake up?, Y talk to people wherever I go and they don't care to take action and do something!
coyoschaustli 2 years ago
Is this bitch retarded
Sinamatics 2 years ago 5
incredaBly retarded!
jonathanburr89 2 years ago
haha i forgot i watched this video i thought you were talking about me haha but yea she definitely is
Sinamatics 2 years ago
Lol na not dont worry your ace if u can realise people like that are retarded
jonathanburr89 2 years ago
haha if you cant understand how the monetary system can work without the 3rd party fed then yea you gotta be dumb
Sinamatics 2 years ago
true man very true!
jonathanburr89 2 years ago
jeje for king? chill....for president get obama out of the white house
Ominous09 2 years ago
So sick of the perpetrators of the false debate, which news lady here epitomizes.
Yuck.
psychawareness 2 years ago
I meant perpetuators, but perpetrators works too.
psychawareness 2 years ago
RON PAUL FOR KING!
MystiK570 2 years ago 28
ron paul for jesus!
chbrules 2 years ago 5
@MystiK570 To say Ron Paul for King is like saying Jesus for King... He doesn't want to rule the kingdom, he wants to give the kingdom to the people...
TheConservatveLibral 1 year ago
@MystiK570 that would be the only time i'd gladly live under a dictatorship! :D
chaset51 1 year ago
@MystiK570 I'm pretty sure he'd like the very opposite of that! lol.
TheBestThomasJay 11 months ago
The world currency is on the table. Their testing it electronically.
These ppl operate slowly.
The enemy is Rothchild/Zionists. Their hands are in the Vatican, other countries, the 14 Federal Reserves in the US. England/British empire of course. Illuminati/Freemasons. its them. Alright I got to eat breakfast. not many understand me anyway. Its like this is a journal entry/cry for help I'm probally complaining, but I think they should be brought to Justice.
lorerax1 2 years ago 7
Wow a politician speaking American!!! This man is awesome!!!
dorotwhy 2 years ago 32
Hmmm.... What can i say? Ron Paul is right and been right for decades. So what else is there to say? Just be like Jim Cramer go buy some washington mutual stocks.
MIT2004 2 years ago 5
Reporters just don't seem to be smart enough to deal with questions other than the 2 choice questions they are trained to ask. "So do you think we should do this, or do you think we should do that?" And if the answer they get reveals that the alternatives they offered stem from what the interviewee views as a basic misconception-well, mental agility is lacking. They think they didn't get an answer, and have to force the guy to commit to fall into one of the limited categories they started with.
GBanville 2 years ago 3
Why is the reporter looking so sarcastic or having that asshole face. She doesn't know shit. Ron Paul knows what needs to come, her dumbass is working for these corrupt dumbasses.
IndividualityMonarch 2 years ago 6
I think it was because he always answers sincerely with alot of info, which isn't a bad thing, but you can see the impatience in her face because he wasn't giving her shorter answers. He makes sure that the people watching are getting the info they need to understand what's going on and not act like every other politician out there that thinks ordinary Americans are experts in economics and political matters...at least that's how I see it. He could make a 10 year old understand! xD
XenonTheWarriorGas 2 years ago 2
how the hell did i get here from slipknot vids
joshbobak2 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
1.Cover your mouth with your hand
2. Make a wish
3.Close your hand (fist)
4. Hold your hand at heart for 5 seconds
5. Send this to 3 more videos
6. Tommorrow will be the best day ever
it actually worked
Money- you will find a wad of $200 in cash
Love- Your crush or lover will kiss you or ask you out."
angelkitten608 2 years ago
search mustfarhan and get 100% working and proven forex crude oil forcast
mustfarhan 2 years ago
Rockefeller greenspan etc. took a lot of property basically through a big scam, why does everybody recognize these takeovers as they were legal? Couldn't you just take back your property under the name of sane and moral thinking? through their scam-policies and "laws" they willfully killed numerous people by taking property and waging wars. How can they get away with all of this and they are still continuing, they are people as well, they aren't anymore special in anyway. any thoughts?
LemonAndYoghurt 2 years ago
as if they were legal*
LemonAndYoghurt 2 years ago
That news anchor was so dumb. I'm a 19 year old pizza delivery boy and I understood why our economy sucks, who is to blame, and what is the solution. Either she's playing dumb or she is dumb. Both aren't to the viewer's benefit
SignalLost730 2 years ago
HR1207, the bill Ron Paul presented to audit the FED is gaining traction. That will at best raise awarness. While the Fed is unconstitutional, it is legal. Some of the money they print replaces old money, but most of it is new money that lowers the value of the dollar causing inflation. The 700 billion for 1st bailout was appropriated as Congress voted on it. What about the countless dollars that the FED has put into global markets with no appropriation? We have to End the FED!
3DNC 2 years ago
Article 1, Section 8 of US Constitution gives the power the Fed holds to Congress. Most of congress does not understand the system. I think before the FED can end a lot of congress will have to be educated/replaced. Along with the money printed, the false low interest rates set by the FED is part of the current problems. The Federal Reserve Act is written such that not even the President can change it. watch?v=3QkmLnNEvdU All central banks before the FED had to get renewed or were temporary.
3DNC 2 years ago
Economy is a constantly evolving. There is no reason to pin down economy because of the way US Constitution was written so long ago.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
It is the nature of the Constitution to change, and it has many times before. The FED was unconstitutional when the Act passed 12/23/1913. I agree with your comment that it is hard to pin down one event, but my prior points are relative. Your comment of written so long ago really bothers me, as it implies the states cannot amend the document, or that it should be ignored. The FED concerns me in that not even the President can answer to them, as spoken by the former chair. watch?v=3QkmLnNEvdU
3DNC 2 years ago
Some of the money the FED prints replaces old currency, most of it is new & lowers the value of the dollar & causes inflation. The low interest rates, set by the fed over the recent years have added to the debt the gvmt owes. I find it ironic we have come out of Wars Declared by congress (legal wars) richer than undeclared. We actually got back on a gold standard after WWII, and had to get off it again after Vietnam. I am not saying an immediate return to gold is the answer. HR1207 is a start.
3DNC 2 years ago
I dont see any reason why the value of dollar should not go down. I support the gradual devaluation of dollar over a period of time.
I want to see it devalue against foreign currencies so we can significantly close the long running trade deficit and may be someday have trade surplus.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
I fear the dollar will continue to be worth less, compared to other currencies, as it has over the past five years. We have become a nation of consumers, and lack manufacturing. We need to find ways to cut spending, yet increase manufacturing. We should have let the market correct itself rather than nationalize our way into socialism. We have yet to see anything really positive come from any of these bailouts other than more dependence gvmt.
3DNC 2 years ago
By the way, I simply disagree that you can devalue your way to prosperity via relative deficit rates. I understand the point, but disagree, as I think a strong currency is better than weak. I do admit I could be wrong. It just seems backwards, but I understand the logic, I just disagree.
3DNC 2 years ago
As of October 2008 Canada was the largest trading partner of the US at just over 500 billion $ for the year 2008.
Do you know why Canadians fear when the value of Canadian $ goes over 80 cents to a US $. They lose comparative advantage which means it makes their exports expensive.
It is natural that a US company will come to Canadian manufacturers rather than buying same products from US manufacturers because the buyer will save 15-20 cents in each dollar it spends because of $ exchange rate.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
Comment removed
3DNC 2 years ago
Our products manufactured in the US will be affordable to foreign countries only if the value of our dollar goes down.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
That might be true, but we buy so much and depend on other currencies, so that would only backfire making us have to pay more, or inflate prices for the things we buy at the grocery store in America. Not to mention all the unbalance that is already there in our trade with other countries. It would only hurt the citizen, and their savings, not to mention the value of their paycheck.
3DNC 2 years ago
I meant to say we depend on products from other countries, so a week dollar hurts the American citizen at the grocery store and shopping everyday, as everything is imported. It also hurts savings. I meant to say countries, not currencies, but basically same point. A weak dollar is not good for the American.
3DNC 2 years ago
If I were a Canadian manufacturer supplying goods to US companies. I would want the value of Canadian $ to stay low and the US $ to go up because my goods will become cheaper to the US buyers due to $ exchange rate My competitors in the US offering the very same goods in the US will surely be hurt and lose the market share. Which means my factory will keep humming and my employees will keep earning their pay checks while exactly the opposite will happen to my US competitors and their employees
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
I know we expect when exchange rates go down, the trade should go up, but it does not always happen. The fact is our trade surpluses are long gone, and we are left with all these trade deficits. History indicates when we had a surplus in trade, we also had a strong dollar, so I am reluctant to devaluing the dollar as a plan. I think you have some good points, but I maintain that less spending and cuts in gvmt are required for real change. In either case I support HR1207.
3DNC 2 years ago
BTW: I want to thank you for good debate and not name calling, so common on YouTube. For that you have my respect. I will continue to learn more about economics and see if I change. I am very open minded, but troubled by the current situation. I agree with you that more people should be discussing these issues. We obviously have our differences, but we can trade comments without sarcasm and childish remarks, and that is good. Maybe some others will join in the debate.
3DNC 2 years ago
I absolutely disagree with cutting the size of government for no reason. As the population size grows it is very logical to grow the size of government to keep it in pace with growth of population
Here is small example: As the population grows the size of students population grows at a public school. It is very logical to add new teachers by hiring to take care of growth in student population. Adding teachers means additional funding from the government which means growth in size of government.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
The Federal gvmt spends more on education than any other nation, but ironically it is not reflected in performance. I value the 10th Amendment and that requires responsibility, so there has to be laws and people to enforce them. It is the Federal gvmt nationalizing & bailing out corporations that should fail that I am against, along with this Empire posture when we can't even defend our border. Consider how the Federal gvmt has had entangling alliances that have hurt us over the past 50+ years.
3DNC 2 years ago
Of course the performance in education was not going to improve when eduction policy like "No Child Left Behind" was focused just on making kids pass a standardized test so a school can qualify for funds.
At the college level there was no point in appointing middlemen corporations like Sallie Mae just to distribute tax payer funded Federal loans for college kids so that these middlemen like Sallie Mae can gobble up over 50 billion $ over few years in their ultra-low risk loan ventures.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
Comment removed
3DNC 2 years ago
Comment removed
3DNC 2 years ago
@VoodooPolitics101 typical statist moron...I'm guessing you are under the age of 30, or just stupid
pretorious700 11 months ago
VoodooPolitics101:
"Our products manufactured in the US will be affordable to foreign countries only if the value of our dollar goes down. "
How do you think US manufactureres would be get competitiveness against low cost Chinese products?
nazirdjon 2 years ago
Remember that China is NOT our largest trading partner, it's Canada. We traded about 340 billion $ worth of goods with China in the year 2008 as opposed to 550 billion $ in trade with Canada in 2008.
Also remember than Province of Ontario in Canada is the largest supplier of manufactured goods to the US amongst all 10 provinces of Canada. Ontario has minimum wage currently set at 8.75 $ Canadian. The exchange rate has hovered at around 80-85 cents Canadian to 1 US $ in the last few months.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
The legislative branch (the Congress) has control over FED not the executive branch so it is pretty natural that FED does not answer to the president.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
Congress doesn't really controlled them. They have a liaison between the FED board and congress known as the chairman, but congress only recently really got involved, as far as voting when the FED started requiring hundreds of billions. Weeks before the $700 billion bailout, the FED dumped about 70 billion into global markets along with other central banks without Congress. The FED is an independent service that congress has never really audited. The FED does report to congress via the chairman.
3DNC 2 years ago
The Congress created FED. If the Constitution does not allow the government to have a central bank then the Constitution should be changed to let the government not only have a central bank but have it under direct control of executive branch which is the case in every other country in the world.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
i dont know what your thing is voodoo, but after reading several of your comments its clear you just dont get it.
xrongor 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That is exactly what happens if you are a believe of Ron Paul's "do nothing" approach.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
and you are a believer of the socialism can save us all approach.
xrongor 2 years ago
This man is for trashing a system that does not work... I think there is some action invovled in that. He has an uphill battle in hand against our corrupt government who are just as guilty through collusion.
knightnoctum3 2 years ago
i dont mean to argue, im all for getting rid of the private federal reserve bank and i think the banksters should all go to jail for fraud.
but to say the fed (or anything) is unconstitutional but legal makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
xrongor 2 years ago
I agree. The Federal Reserve Act passing Congress made it legal, and that passed 12/23/1913. Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution reads that Congress has all the responsibility that was delegated to these third party bankers known as the FED. All central banks prior to the FED were temporary and had dates for review/renew. Congress is not ready to take their power back, but HR1207 is a step towards transparency. Congress never even voted on what the FED did until the $700 billion bailout.
3DNC 2 years ago
I am referring to text that reads, To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures". That is one area delegated to the FED as some powers were also delegated to the IRS, as far as Article1 Section8. With the 16th Amendment passing in 1913, it adds some interesting aspects to debate because of the definition of the word income. That is a different topic as far as the Constitutional definition of the word income, the IRS, and the 16th.
3DNC 2 years ago
ron paul is so smart!
psycho26shon 2 years ago
Do any of these big investment companies, or Banks, or Car companies have any ties to congress? or the treasury? Should be a damn crime. They are just paying each other off. Congress should be burned to the ground. They don't think we know what they are doing?
robstuk666 2 years ago
Ron Paul for Pres!
pusherman19 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The guy who wants to get rid of FAA, FED, FDA, EPA, Department of Education and so on....
Insanity at its best
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
i know, screw that constitution!
celach 2 years ago
Yes Ron Paul is only authority on how to interpret the Constitution. He earned it by getting 2% of the votes in the last election.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
I don't recall saying Ron Paul was an authority, or the only authority, or him earning it. Where'd you get that from?
celach 2 years ago
Are you calling 98% of Americans stupid? I'd go with people's choice being a function of their information. Ron Paul was the guy you were not suppossed to know about. Reporters today are actors serving a boss. Ron Paul dominated the net because people are free here. This medium works well for Ron Paul the Champion of the Constitution.
RickTJustice 2 years ago 3
He cant win in the real world so he has win in the virtal world(of internet)
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
Thank You Voodoo that is my point exactly. He nor anybody else without bankster, corporate and media backing stands a chance. Our Republic represents the money that puts them and keeps them in office. That should be a focus of CHANGE. The net is a much more level battlefield. One those in power will seek to overhaul because it represents unpredictability and allows smaller less connected people a larger voice.
RickTJustice 2 years ago 2
I that case I wont mind at all he can become the virtual president of the US forever.
VoodooPolitics101 2 years ago
So true. I noticed that the MSM's position on the internet is that it's unreliable or false information. They discredit it as if no truth exists here. But it's the exact opposite
SignalLost730 2 years ago
And what good has the Fed done??
What good has the FDA done and for God's sake, what good has the Dept. of Education done?? Created dumb asses like you obviously. Ever read the founding fathers?? Do you think they are insane also?? Learn history dickhead.
jrb112476 2 years ago
America: Socialists for the Wealthy.
EG. Money for universally accessible healthcare, no way, but if the banks need a trillion dollar bandaid, no problem! LOL!
rhysfawr4 2 years ago 2
i like how that yellow reporter triys to speak for him, fuucking cunt reporter
XxFLUxX 2 years ago
Comment removed
jcapcik 2 years ago
Can you see the confusion on that sheep of a reporter's face. She is so deep in the matrix that she can't conceive a world without the FED and its "overseeing" of monetary policy. "Well then who will oversee monetary policy?" What a sheep, what a moron, what a socialist. Has the whole country lost its mind? Has the whole country forgot about the power of free markets?!?!
gilperalta 2 years ago
"Has the whole country forgot about the power of free markets?!?!"
They scoff at the notion of markets making "natural corrections" that are for the betterment of their interests. They have been indoctrinated with the idea that free markets allow rich capitalists to steal their wealth. They believe government to be the only entity with the power to keep that from happening, not realizing that it is only the government that has the power to steal their wealth, and uses it!
jcapcik 2 years ago
I have and will continue to repeatedly challenge Obama to afford Ron Paul the opportunity to oversee the Fed. I am seriously beginning to think I am not insane in my proposal. It may be a way for the reds to realize RP really is true to them* in practice and theory. Actually, he is for ALL, and unfortunately, that is precisely what frightens the weak.
*"them" meaning what the party has ostentatiously been deemed to represent
zoso418 2 years ago
the federal reserve is unaccountable to the population. Therefore it is a licence to steal from the population. Pass the bill to audit the reserve or be content being a slave. Bend over for your masters.
lighthammar 2 years ago
The only man talking about sanity and sound money. Get rid of the zionist FEDS!
maggiebott 2 years ago
see "Newstopia explains the Federal Reserve" on Youtube. Funny and spot on!
shizont 2 years ago
Oh the market managed the monetary policy before 1913. HA!! Read "Rise of the American Civilization" by Beard. It was a freaking free for all. Recall the guilded age? Wildcat banks? It was insane. Now the Fed and wall st went insane just on a bigger scale and stole our money. Free Market? There is no such thing. Just like communism. Free markets get corrupt just like the gov't.
drsuperhero 2 years ago
we neeed ron paul to have executive power
sirpico123 2 years ago 2
not only has the fed created financial mischief. They have been behind the USA getting in every war since WW1
chancew44 2 years ago
ron paul all the way baby
frilloman828 2 years ago
The goverment, should fight the banks to get its real power. Its sad the banks own the gov the people cuz we just work for them, like no other slave day after day.
jjhonnyem626 2 years ago
must see: !!!
MaxKeiser1.Blogspot. c o m
Armando7654 2 years ago
stupid bitch.
dinkolino2 2 years ago
"just quickly", stfu bitch you dont say that to ron paul
LeoE08 2 years ago
the purpose of the fight would be to resist against something that i know is evil and wrong. if i die then whatever. im going to die some day anyways. at least i took the chance of fighting for freedom. yes, that would boost my ego, but the purpose is bigger than my ego. my ego getting a boost would just be a bonus.
yumerican001 2 years ago
I'd take a Bullet for this guy!
Ron Paul 2012
ilovefiatmoney 2 years ago 3
God dammit, is it that hard for me to live a life without being robbed?
When 95% of the population wants something, and our politicians go against our words, isn't it common sense that they are getting orders from someone else?
This is not a conspiracy theory folks. It is happening RIGHT BEFORE OUR EYES.
This is the message I am feeling from our "leaders"...
"Follow us and get us rich, or we will drive this entire country into the ground"
jeebsy12 2 years ago
I saw this interview on Bloomberg live- for once they did get the texts right. Last time they "misunderstood" his message and put on a pre prepared text, claiming that "Congressman Paul calls for more regulation"..
Steenville 2 years ago 2
I wanted to see this live but I missed it. I got to work late because Bloomberg kept delaying it :(
DaviDeXtA 2 years ago
Nice to be able to catch it on YouTube later :-). Too bad some text is blocking the Bloomberg textline, which kept updating all the way during the interview, faithfully repeating what he was saying- for once. Last time they misrepresented what he said..
Steenville 2 years ago
to elaborate more, what ron paul is trying to do is Give america back to its people. right now the federal reserve owns each and every one of us, the united nations and international government is just as bad. they overrule domestic law. ron want to give the government, give america back to the people. the fed is not the government, its private. the "creature from jekyll island."
PoliticsAddict 2 years ago 5
ron paul has an almost perfect voting record. and sure his perfect government and perfect society is pre-1913 and earlier, with complete property rights and no federal reserve and states rights...thats a good ideaology if you ask me. whos plan is better?
PoliticsAddict 2 years ago 8
we are paying for 60 years of fed/congress/executive corruption right now. . . . RP is right.
wolfgangfaust 2 years ago 5
what a great guy Ron Paul is. Why is he the only one talking out?
czubspenx 2 years ago 4
freedom and sound money and what to do with the people who work hard living day by day sacrifice them to the alter of capitalist greed.
put Ron Paul in a caravan park on minimum wage and 3 children to feed ,,,Paul is the right name the real Judas of the people (its a long story )
youstupidwoman 2 years ago
Or maybe we just have a voice of reason now.
kingroy1989 2 years ago 2
Ron Paul's wise words once again. A true statesman.
PAUL/SCHIFF 2012
BittersweetManor 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ANN COULTER 2012 !
jdfox1 2 years ago
brilliant - he is absolutely right. in addition to what Ron Paul said, the Federal Reserve is also the secret organization. No one knows who its members are --absolutely absurd. more absurd is that we have just taken this set up for granted.
blkshprd 2 years ago 3
i wonder if all the talk of ending the federal reserve will help bring in a global bank that the bilderbergs have talked about for years. I hope there arent doing that. American's are just stupid enough to get rid of the fed to put in some world bank,,,,,,,,,, i hope not,, Ron Paul is my hero :D
jwka2001 2 years ago 2
Wow a politician that actually answers questions instead of bloviating.
sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhh 2 years ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL
ararat123457 2 years ago
ron paul 2012
wonderwhywhy 2 years ago 5
Is she playing the "gotcha" newsreporting?
leoca 2 years ago
why doesn't Ron Paul expose the purposes of the NWO when he was running?
phalluses 2 years ago
Because people were already calling him a loon as it was. If he were to come straight out and start breaking it down, forgetabout it, people would have had everyone reason ( people being MSM ) to not put him up on stage.
MrMP81 2 years ago
Ron Paul 2012!!!
cw2992 2 years ago 3
The system, meaning the fed reserve, is not the problem.
Its the idiots running the show.
The system is brilliant and sound.
MeLikeGoFast 2 years ago
No it's not. You're not factoring human nature into the mix. A system that relies on some individuals knowing and doing the right thing is flawed and unsound. Centralized government planning doesn't work because of this very reason.
surGeonGG 2 years ago
Shouldnt our goal be to strive for perfection instead of automatically assuming we arent capable off it?
MeLikeGoFast 2 years ago
That's what the market does. If you want perfection you should educate the people so they make better decisions in the market. It makes no sense that a group of individuals, whose morals and motives are unknown to us, should sit in Washington DC and manage the economy limited both by their information and intellect.
surGeonGG 2 years ago