NFL Films Top 100 Greatest Players #90 Kurt Warner - HD, HQ

[robertmendozanasty]

higher than 90!

[oldtimemoonshine77]

90 are you shitting me? should be at least 40

[9ner]

He deserves to be higher

[fredyKillS187]

This Days they tallk about Drew Brees More than Eli Manning When Eli Won the Soper bowl Thums Up if True -__-

[brokendeath18]

@fredyKillS187 You misspelled Super Bowl

[BigdogH201]

Wow..a medicore quarterback is ranked #90 on the NFL All-time list:)

[LgFaver]

@BigdogH201 he's far from mediocre. he's not a top 10 QB either but come on, he was good and at times he was great. 

[BigdogH201]

@LgFaver I was finished commenting. But since you brought this up, I 'll conclude. He couldn't improv outside of the pocket, struggled mightily with NYG, couldn't hold a football, and couldn't win outside of a system.

[Lovegainers5]

I believe that Warner will be a first ballot hall of famer because of the 99 season and his league Mvps and superbowl Mvp! He was so acurrate with his passes that it was beautiful to watch! I miss that kind of offense!

[ceaznation]

was a honor to play him in the Superbowl.

[calicolombiano27]

Even as a pats fan, I think he deserves to be up there with Brady and Peyton Manning. Kurt Warner was always underrated. 3 best super bowl performances of all time, end of story.

[Shadow9220]

man this story would've 100x better if Arizona didnt get robbed on the SB

[whatitdoy011]

Come on Caleb Hanie! You had it! lol

[Sephiroth766]

Kurt Warner's story would make for a great movie.

[sa3oody001]

When saying best football team in the world is he serious?? it is a sport played in only two countries... he should say in america... 

[mcoltrane5]

@sa3oody001 Wrong. American football is played in America, Canada, Mexico, all throughout Europe, and especially in Japan (they actually love football more than Canada)

So it's most likely that the best team in America is the best team in the world, right? Especially considering that we sent a bunch of Division II and III players to represent us in the last American Football World Cup, and still won the whole thing against other countries best players...

[gotribe1997]

did he only start wearing gloves when he went to Arizona?

[Shadow9220]

@gotribe1997 he had a finger injury on both hands lol

[guitarsANDcars39]

man i miss the old rams. marshall faulk, kurt warner, isaac bruce, torry holt, hakim

[sandythebear]

Fuck rothlisberger in 2008 super bowl. We all know Warner deserved 2

[Crylivion]

@sandythebear Roethlisberger* - if you're going to rant about the guy, spell his name right. Don't blame him either, blame the refs....just another uninformed person getting mad at the wrong person.

[psalmtone2008]

THE most accurate passer ever. Period.

[hcox]

He took the Arizona freakin Cardnals to the Super Bowl. That alone makes him A Hall of Famer.

[hailhopes]

Kurt on this list but no Warren Moon? i dont know about this lisit

[izzy4684]

@hailhopes Warren Moon never won a super bowl, and he was basically a run and shoot QB, which unfortunately they dont get a lot for respect in the league.

[hillsoftemple]

I don't think Kurt Warner deserves to be on here as one of the top 100 greatest players ever. Don't get me wrong, kurt was really good but I just think he is one of the really good quarterbacks in the pass heavy era of the NFL. When you look at the legends who were left off like Lem Barney, Charlie Taylor, Kenny Houston. Its hard to put Kurt higher when he was a good quarterback on two good offenses. I think he is really great with great numbers but not top 100

[cbaldwinjr]

@hillsoftemple I disagree. Two NFL MVP's. Would've been a two time Super Bowl MVP. Give me greatness in a shorter span than very good for an elongated career. It's Hall of FAME...how many people know who Lem Barney is? I do...but I'm a sports historian. Warner deserves his place. He's about four plays from being a 4x Super Bowl quarterback and led two of the most downtrodden teams to them (90's Rams...and the Cardinals [pick an era]).

[QBDogKiller]

His time in Arizona taking the Cardinals to the super bowl cemented his status as a hall-of-fame QB.

[drkthms7]

has he done enough to get in the hall of fame?

[MrOkmlp]

Kurt looks best in Cardinal red

[Novastar6]

@MrOkmlp But will always be remembered as a Ram. Pays to win a Superbowl

[17fused]

at least he could retire unlike brett farve

[acenace24]

Kurt Warner absolutely deserves to be on this list, he should also be in the HOF

[zyxwut321]

@acenace24: I agree. He'll be in the HOF 5-10 years from now (like Cris Carter he won't get in immediately but he will get in eventually).

[Gilch30]

@acenace24 He will be in the HOF dumbass. He hasnt been out of the league long enough

[samayirx12]

forget rags to riches....this is bags to richers

[GeorgeVreelandHill]

Kurt is a HOF quarterback.

A great player and a credit to the game.

Why is he ranked so low at #90?

George Vreeland Hill

[atl236136]

@manncandy1 Amen, man, amen! Want to know why Warner is HoF? Look at what's happened since he left ARI (to be fair, Boldin leaving also hurt). Leinart had that team before Warner did and what the f!*# did he do with it? Rams gave up on Kurt b/c Bulger just happened to look good for a shining moment when key cogs came off of injury...they let Kurt go and what the f#*! did Bulger ever do after?

Anyhow, Kurt took the frikkin' Cards to the SB. There's a resume builder if I ever saw one.

[manncandy1]

marc bulger and matt never took their teams to the superbowl. So why do people say kurt warner was only good because he was surrounded by talent. All those team with great qb like elway, aikman and marino were surrounded with talent and big markets. the rams and the cardinal the worst teams in football. He took them to the superbowl. hall a famer period.

[TheGreatRL]

@manncandy1 Because its a fact. Who makes the argument that Bulger is better than Warner? I certainly don't. Surrounded by talent? Elway? pffh Terrell Davis is the extent of the talent he had. Aikman? Yes. Marino? The Marks brothers were the only talent he ever had and that didn't exactly last a long time like the GSOT. He plays with legendary recieving corps like the rams and cardinals, of course they go to the superbowl. He plays with the mediocre at best Giants and does nothing.

[TheGreatRL]

@manncandy1 Don't get me wrong, I love Kurt Warner but his legacy is overrated.

[westside159]

he was good , but never mentioned with the elways , aikmans , marino's , montana's , favres , etc

[chewbaca1989]

Kurt Warner was a fucking Terminator, not human, a machine. I loved watching him play.

[TheWPPOgaming]

i wish the cardinals won the superbowl that year.

[OettingerCroat]

great stuff @Charod3,

another interesting fact:

- who threw for the most yards in a Super Bowl? KURT WARNER (this video said so).

- who threw for the 2nd-most yards in a Super Bowl? KURT WARNER.

- who threw for the 3rd-most yards in a Super Bowl? KURT WARNER.

the guy is simply amazing...

[djpxfreshx]

i think he should be 100 if he is on the list at all

[jwatt34]

He was great but you cant beat having Bruce, Faulk, Holt or Boldin and Fitzgerald. Glad to see him on the list though he was a gamer

[artmajor1]

Absolute disgrace that this guy is ranked above Fran Tarkenton.

[blackshot]

@artmajor1 well, NFL films love super bowl rings and Warner did go to the same amount of super bowls as Tarkenton, but he also won one of them (PS:Tarkenton is my all-time favorite quarterback XD)

[frost122585]

When he got #90 I stpped careing about these lists. THis guy should be top 30 all time at any position. He LEAD 3 teams to the super bowl with organization that could not get into the playoffs before he came. He has a ring and one of the highest career ratings of all time and his post season QB rating was even higher. He reached 30k yards faster than any other Qb tied with Marino. He was a winner. And of course has the 3 most passing yards peformances ever in Super Bowls. And started at 28.

[thispoorguy]

@frost122585 No. You can lead 2 crappy teams to a superbowl, but you can't only play 5 good years and then 5 crappy years in the NFL and be considered great. You have to be consistent too. Also he was a system quarterback, when he was with the Giants, their system didn't work for him, the Cardinals system didn't fit him either as his first 2 years there were bad. But once they changed it to something similar to the 99 Rams, he had success. A top 30 player could play good in any system.

[glealblood]

really? joe montanna is a system qb did horrible with the chiefs , tom brady would not be a good qb with another team in my mind , brett farvre was a system qb , was horrible when he played for the jets.

[CallMeKoga]

@glealblood you're an idiot. Both Favre and Montana were at the tail end of their careers when they played for different teams. Yes Joe Montana was a system qb, but Favre...HELL NO! A system qb doesn't finish their career as the all time leader in interceptions. Just because they don't succeed right away when they join another team doesn't make them a system qb. Also Favre admitted to playing the 08 season with an injury in his throwing hand.

[glealblood]

Whats your point , that they were at the tail end of there careers ? favre is a west coast qb , everyone knows that , just because favre was known for being a gunslinger doesn't separate that . He made stupid throws , because he trusted his arm , But thats not why he holds the int record , he holds that because he played long after he should have .

[CallMeKoga]

@glealblood Joe Montana was constantly getting injured in San Francisco, which is why he was traded to KC in the first place. As for Favre, he is NOT a system qb. He spent 17 years in Green Bay, when he played for the jets he played well for the first half of the season, the following year in Minnesota, was arguably the best season of his career. If he was a system qb he wouldn't have been able what he did in Minnesota. I think you're confusing a "system" with having good talent on your team.

[glealblood]

@CallMeKoga really? what system did they run in greenbay? what system did they run in ny , And what system did they run in minnesota? I'll give you a hint 2 of them are the same

[CallMeKoga]

@glealblood what? did they have the same offensive coordinator in greenbay and minnesota? Why you trippin bro? You know I'm right, just admit it to keep from looking like an ass.

[glealblood]

@CallMeKoga thats not a system you fuck tard ,A system is a type not who coaches , a west coast ran by the vikings is the same west coast ran by the packers , Just a few changes , When a qb calls the plays its the same system , the jets dont run a west coast . Just because you think every coaches playbook is different because you don't know shit about football doesnt make me a ass , it makes you stupid . Just like the clay matthews could play the same with pitt or the nyj

[CallMeKoga]

@glealblood oh I'm scared now, cause u called me a fuck tard. Relax dog, Brett Favre is one of the greatest qb's of all time. If you can't see that, then you're as blind as Ray Charles, no matter what type of offense was around him. Every qb is a system quarter back to some extent. Just because I'm right, doesn't mean that you should call me a fuck tard hahaha

[glealblood]

I never said he wasnt a great QB , he is . doesnt make him any less of a system qb then. So most players are system players it doesnt make them bad. I was makeing a point to the other guy that alot of greats are system qbs , so why was he hating on kurt , Really there are very few qbs who are not system qbs , The only great that sticks out who isnt is peyton manning .

[glealblood]

Its the same base , a 3/4 . a 4/3 is completely different , Just like a spread O is completely diff from a west coast , Favre is a west coast qb , it doesnt matter whos the fucking coach you dumbass

[glealblood]

I called you a fucktard because you didnt seem to understand that the vikings with favre ran the same O as the packers with favre ran . brad childress actually made it almost identical to that O because he wanted favre to be comfortable.

[glealblood]

good talent on his team? beside adrian peterson who the fuck plays for the vikings? Rice wasnt good until farvre showed up , and he is a no show in Seattle , shancoe is a average te at best , Harvin is an ok slot reciever , berrian is pathetic , So whos fucking talented ?

[CallMeKoga]

@glealblood hahaha relax man. Cussing in an argument only makes you look stupid. I get what you were saying now, he's a great qb, but if a different type of offense was around him, he wouldn't be so successful. I gotcha man. All you have to do is explain, the reason why I an argument goes down is cause someone doesn't understand what the other guy is saying. Calling me a dumbass or a fuck tard doesn't make you look smart lol and I'm just wondering what makes peyton not a system qb?

[glealblood]

I got ya . Well i said that wrong , Peyton is still a system qb , just unlike all other qbs in the fact that he runs his own system . Not like he could go to west coast or anything , just the fact that hes the only qb in history that pretty much created his own system . Even though moore did have a impact in it.

[Favre2plus2]

90????....90?????????......90?­!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?

[memojedi]

Kurt Warner is much better QB than Brett Favre

[milesgrandpa2009]

Kurt Warner ran the greatest offense ever assembled,him being no.90 is a joke!Had he been healthy his whole career,we would be talking about Kurt Warner as one of if not the greatest quarterbacks in nfl history.He is the greatest Superbowl quarterback in nfl history and his record will never be broken.You might say,oh he had great weapons around him,but couldnt you say the same thing about any superbowl winning quarterback?Name any great quarterback and look at who was around him.

[dertylox45]

@milesgrandpa2009 great point.i got so sick of hearing media types saying tom brady has no good receivers.troy brown had over 100 catches in 01 and several clutch plays as kr/punt returner.david patten scored 4 touchdowns in 1 game.in the snowbowl vs my beloved raiders,jermaine wiggins the te had 10 catches in that game.even those crappy buc receivers made plays when it counted,ok keyshawn johnson was good butmy point is as a qb,you're only as good as your receivers and warner had 4 good ones

[blackshot]

@milesgrandpa2009 haha exactly!!!, and this guy took the Cardinals to the superbowl....THE CARDINALS, greatest super bowl quarterback ever, period.

[Jaytee1227]

@milesgrandpa2009 Peyton Manning didn't really have anyone except for Harrison... But I agree with you on most everything else lol

[glealblood]

harrison was nothing until manning showed up

[anth895]

@milesgrandpa2009 Dan Marino?

[majikman85]

@anth895 never won a superbowl

[anth895]

@majikman85 yeah i know but he said name a great quarterback so i said marino and he didnt really have any one to throw to

[majikman85]

@anth895 true... i take back my comment then...

[allblue15]

@milesgrandpa2009 Brady's first and 2nd Super Bowl

[DELTAFORCE662]

@milesgrandpa2009 Warner was over protected like most QBs of 2000's ERA.Warner would never make it in 1980's just like Pussy Brady would never make it.

[sonicismybrawler]

@milesgrandpa2009 Tom Brady and his first Superbowl victory. He had Branch... And thats it.

[123multitaskerclone]

@sonicismybrawler he didn't even have Branch until he was drafted in 2002 so his first super bowl was around average players

[sonicismybrawler]

@123multitaskerclone Well then my mistake lol But you still see the point.

[123multitaskerclone]

@sonicismybrawler yeah i know

[colinpowers7]

@milesgrandpa2009 Tom Brady and the Pats 2003-2004.

[ThaExpert23Outlaw]

@milesgrandpa2009 He is good, but you can't say he is the greatest Superbowl QB ever.

[96wr]

@milesgrandpa2009 Tom brady 2003-2004

[thomasgreendog]

@milesgrandpa2009 tom bardy won the bowl with a bunch of misfits and castoffs as his recievers.....................­...... no good running backs either

[arkbishopbonkerboy]

@milesgrandpa2009 greatest superbowl qb is joe montana 83/122 com/att-68.0 pct-1,142yds-11tds 0ints 4-0 no one comes close to JOE. these numbers are hard to respond to friend, bring actual stats not your opinion like I just did.

[mytimton]

If this guy does not get in the HOF, they need new voters. He's been to 3 Superbowls, and took 2 terrible teams to the Superbowl, and even though he went 1-2 in them, he kept his team in the games, his defense failed to make plays in the final minutes of the 2nd and 3rd one. And he's got the top 3 spots for most passing yards in SuperBowl history, no doubt he's a Hall Of Famer

[Charod3]

Fun fact: Kurt Warner only started all 16 games in a season 3 times: 1999, 2001 and 2008. He went to the Super Bowl those 3 seasons.

[dertylox45]

@Charod3 interesting

[jpsncds]

@Charod3 my favorite qb ever and i never knew that.. some fan i am huh? hahaha

[tksarmy15]

and don't even try to respond that my statement is B.S

[tksarmy15]

@JGunsliner16 Rams were horrible in the first year he played for the rams? THATS BULLSHIT! yes he was 1/4 of the offense but there was Tory holt,Isiac bruce,and  MARSHAL FAULK who was half there offense and tory and isiac were combinef for 1/4. and he had fitz as a wide reciever who was 1/2 the cards offense. So even though Kurt is one of the greatest QB's with a supposed "shitty teams" He Had weapons that are and will become hall of famers so its not all Kurt and o ya he also had aquan boldin.

[MFFL2008]

@tksarmy15 I think your argument compares to the Phil Jackson debate that he's coached 3 of the all time greats, yeah he had all those weapons but he took advantage of the weapons he had, look where Arizona is a year after he left, and yeah St. Louis had Marc Bulger but he never did nearly as much as Kurt Warner not to mention his brilliant stats in Super Bowls, 83/132, 1155 yards and 6 touchdowns.

[JGunslinger16]

Here's what nobody mentions but everyone knows.... Warner took TWO shit teams (Rams were HORRIBLE before Warner and the Cards were... well, the Cards) to the Super Bowl in his first year with the team. Who says you gotta be flashy to win???

[panthernaruto]

@JGunslinger16 rams werent horrible but the rams drafted torry holt and accquired faulk warner is a great qb tho im not taking anything away for him

[Pgaither84]

@JGunslinger16 Kurt didn't take the cards to the Super Bowl his first year with them. Not even close. It was his 4th year with the team.

What's really cool is that his first year with the team he had the best season a Cards QB ever had.

Also, you act like Warner carried his teams. Bruce & Holt and HoF HB Marshall Faulk... then All-Pro players "Leaping" Larry Fitz and Boldin. Common man, he had some serious weapons. Don't deny it. [by the way, none of this is a knock on the guy, he was great!]

[FrizzKid05]

@Pgaither84

Where were these franchises prior to Kurt Warner playing? The Rams went 4-12 the season prior, and the Cardinals were a joke....what happened when Kurt Warner took over? Both franchises went to Super Bowls...and one went on to win it, while the other two SB games came down to the last possession.

He passed for more than 350 yards in all three SB's he played in and where is Peyton Manning on the list? Tom Brady? Eli Manning? Dan Marino? Their numbers are nowhere NEAR touching them!

[Pgaither84]

@FrizzKid05 I like Kurt. I think he is a HoF QB. I also hated watching my 49ers have to lose to him for many years. However, in all of what you said, you fail to acknowledge that both of those franchises also got a lot better across the board, and not just at QB. It doesn't hurt when your #1 & #2 receivers are All-Pro Super Stars [Bruce/Holt or Fitz/Boldin] or when you have a HoF HB [Faulk], or at least an All-Pro HB [Edge], not to mention both the Rams & Cards improved their defenses a lot too!

[FrizzKid05]

@Pgaither84

The Cardinals weren't any better. Kurt Warner made them better. They HAD Anquan Boldin and Larry Fitzgerald. They sucked before he showed up and Kurt Warner made them better. He MADE those teams what they were by his leadership. It's as simple as that.

[Pgaither84]

@FrizzKid05 Would the Cards have gone to the Superbowl with out Kurt? Hell no!

Would he Cards have gotten to the Superbowl with Kurt Warner but no Pro-Bowl Receivers to throw too? Nope.

Again, we didn't even talk about all the talent the Cards drafted/matured in the 4 years Warner was there as well. Darnell Dockett, Karlos Danseby, DRC, Adrian Wilson are all [still] top 10 or even top 5 at each of their positions.

[FrizzKid05]

@Pgaither84

Problem: How many points did that defense give up in the Super Bowl? Yeaaaah: they didn't pay off after Kurt Warner threw the go-ahead touchdown in the 4th quarter, did they? What were they ranked during the season? Kurt Warner led the offense with poise despite his defense giving up too many points.

[Pgaither84]

@FrizzKid05 That is such a terrible excuse. The cards also committed over 120 yards worth of penalties. Do you think that was the norm for them as well?

That defense didn't pay off the next year in OT against the Packers did they? You can't use one game as an example.

You are sounding more and more like how Peyton Manning fans sound. If I'm not suck Warner's dick, then that must mean I think he sucks. No. It means that I think he is really good, but don't give him all the credit like you are.

[FrizzKid05]

@Pgaither84

Actually, you're trying to take the credit for how the Cardinals AND Rams did out of Kurt Warner's hands, when both franchises became mediocre to bad after he left. Peyton Manning IS in a similar situation, minus the fact that their defense did what their defense was designed to do...create turnovers. Tom Brady is the greatest quarterback still playing, but Kurt Warner was the IN-guy when he was playing. Nobody else can do what he did, because of his leadership and timing.

[Pgaither84]

@FrizzKid05 Let me simplify this: Elway carried the broncos for years pretty much all by himself, all the way to the Super Bowl... twice! It wasn't until he had a team around him that he was able to win it all though. Warner made his teams better. MUCH better. He didn't put them on his back and carry them to greatness.

[Junior71392]

underrated in my opinion...i'd say 70's maybe

[JGunslinger16]

@Junior71392 always been underrated... LOL

[HOscalerules]

He went from hero, to zero, to I still got it bitch......gotta love Kurt Warner

[juank215]

my favorite player of all time

[5Be4Funk]

NO QB ever had a better year then Warners first year... every ball he threw was on the money

[ikecham]

what is the name of the song at the beginning

[ikecham]

what is the name of the song

[ReekoChet]

He should've had 3 rings. He brought his last 2 teams in the SuperBowl back from behind only to see it lost by the Defense. His problem was, scored to fast and a break down in defense. HOF 1st ballot.

[NoName1325]

90? He's better then tom brady!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[allblue15]

@NoName1325

now your just being ridiculous

warners good but not as good as brady

[TheMinnie45]

Why dont they make a movie about Kurt Warner

[Zombie1Boy]

@TheMinnie45 They will, give 'em another 10 or 20 years or so! Gonna be great tho!

[Ramfanman1]

I still don't get how some guys are ranked higher than him

[Donkeykong21425]

@Ramfanman1 well because great players are great all the way through their career and as much as I like Kurt Warner, he did struggle with the GIants.

[lionslicer9999]

@Ramfanman1 I don't see how he's on this list. 4 good seasons out of 10? 32 turnovers in 2001, defense kept him in the season. He constantly fumbled, he had interceptions in the worst times. He only had great recievers, he couldn't do anything with average or above average recievers like with the Giants. He lost his job with the Rams in 2002 because he lost 6 straight games because his defense wasn't as good to fix his turnovers anymore. Couldn't win the Giants, bearly won with the Cards.

[RandyMoss2]

@lionslicer9999 if you noticed, ALL of the WR's had mediocre seasons after Warner. Holt, Hakim, Bruce, Boldin, and Fitzgerald all stats dropped

[lionslicer9999]

@RandyMoss2 Isaac was at his prime with Warner. Before Warner has his 3 starting seasons, Bruce had some good seasons when he wasn't injured, same with after Warner Left. Boldin and Fitz never had any decent quarterbacks. Holt had 7 pro bowls, thats 4 without Warner. Bulger got that team to the playoffs. The Rams didn't start to suck until Faulk started having injuries and left. He's a great quarterback, not a top 100 player, maybe top 250.

[Gaia029]

@RandyMoss2 Very Good Point. When Warner left Both The Rams and The Cards, they never went back to the Superbowl. Plus most people that never followed Warner ignore the fact that when a throwing hand is injured enough to the point of constant swelling, its hard to throw the ball , let alone hang on to it. Warner reached milestones and records faster than many QBs plus 2 visits to the Superbowl and one Ring. Definitely a HOF'er. considering he was bagging groceries =)

[OettingerCroat]

@Gaia029 don't forget, THREE visits! two as a ram and one as a cardinal! ;-)

[RandyMoss2]

@lionslicer9999 and he did do ok with the Giants. in 04 when Eli was the being groomed, he went 6-4 as the starter of the horrible team. eli went 0-6 to end the season.

[Ramfanman1]

@tjstevens74

Kurt Warner has been to three super bowls has a ring. He came out of working out of a grocery store... And no one wouldve thought he would be good. Ur guy like u said was the huisman winner and was a big disappointment

[tjstevens74]

Not to rain on Warner's parade, and he was an exceptional QB, but I don't see how he makes this list over Jim Plunkett. Jim was a Heisman winner who got drafter by New England and pretty much thrown to the wolves for years. He then went to SF... which was like going from the frying pan into the fire. He was relegated to back up status, until an injury made him a starter once again... and he leads his team to a SB. Fast forward 3 years, and he does it again.

But no mention of Jim Plunkett? ;[

[iamhungey12345]

@tjstevens74

Because he wasn't great.

He's more of a disappointment, his stats aren't great and while he did have a good career, it's not good enough.

The Hall of Fame voters even made a right call on this one.

[RandyMoss2]

@tjstevens74 Plunkett is def a HOF'er but not even close to making this list. You have to have a good career throughout, not just 2 seasons

[HeadlessEye]

Plunkett never won an MVP. Warner won 2. Plunkett never made a pro-bowl. Warner made 4. Plunkett threw more INTs than TD. A lot more. Warner was far more reliable. In 13 career playoff games, Warner ranks first all-time in completion percentage (66.5%), yards per attempt (8.55), and second in passer rating (102.8) in NFL post-season history

You're seriously taking Plunkett over Warner. That's insane.

[iamhungey12345]

@HeadlessEye

There are people who actually thinks Plunkett should be in the HOF. It's amazing how people think of things.

Oh yeah, you also left out the fact that Warner's a two time first team All-Pro as well.

How many Plunkett have? None!

[lorenzodemedici1]

@tjstevens74 Jim Plunkett was the Trent Dilfer of his day. Except he won 2 SBs. Is Trent Dilfer an HOF player?

[tallcarlos66]

Where is Issac Bruce in this list? The one who caught passes for WARNER!

[keenl6rm]

Come back kurt...the cards need you.

[Gaia029]

@keenl6rm OMG - You are SO right. Cards are hurting bad -_-

[RAV52]

I think Kurt Warner is a better man than he ever was a football player and that's saying a lot because he was one helluva QB!

[jmnar4]

warner deserves to be higher than #90

[renisa2000]

used to work at a grocery store,now in the top 100,WOW! well done kurt warner,applause!

[shasselfield]

he should be alot higher on the list

[Budda0420]

One of the greatest QB ever. in the short amount of time he played for he accomplished so much. I could imagine if he played a full career of 20 or so years

[cwarandamizer]

Kurt Warner is the MAN

[frankie398]

His story always brings tears to my eyes. Warner is truly an inspirational and great guy.