There were "three towers" that fell that day. Why do they continue to just focuse on the main two especially after the owner of the towers admitted that he gave the New York Fire Chief the o.k for them "pull it". The tower collapsed the same way as the first two but still they want to deny that there were bombs planted.
Its not a matter of scientific evidence you government payed off nerd fuck. "Facts are facts" sure buddy, its based on politics not your science which im sure is valid
The only thing their flawed science prooves is all you need to bring a building down for cheap is an aeroplane loaded with fuel and with medium size buildings hey its even easier just some jet fuel and it dont even have to burn that hot. Best thing about doing it this way is the buildings come straight down in a nice tidy pile. Constant media and adverts are full of crap turning people into zombies.
Those nutty professors, and nutty physicists, kooky engineers, and zany wacky demolition experts who wouldn't know demolition if it slapped 'em in the twin towers.....
Good thing we have a nerd who writes for a fluff magazine here to set 'em all straight.
The level of manipulation of the mainstream media in the US is staggering, yet SO see-through. I say this without insult to Americans, but the incredibly patronizing, one-sided tone of the major stations is almost infantile. Who the hell trusts this crap? Even in this short clip, there are errors and untruths that ten minutes online will expose, all delivered in that "you're nuts if you think different" manner. It's literally theft of the minds of so many people willing to trust in it.
Bill O'reilly is a neocon liar. Many of the floors of building 7 fell at freefall speed. This man being interviewed is an absolute liar. The engineers are DEFINITELY NOT supporting the governments reports. There were no wings, tail sections, nor titanium engines found at the Pentagon. He says every major plane crash leads to conspiracy theories. Really? Wow I have never of any before 9/11. These people are the ones who try and disinform the public. Dont be dumbed down by the media.
6. It is scientifically impossible for metal to turn to liquid at those temperatures, whatever the speed. 7. Even if it did, how did they find a passport just lying there unscathed from the same fire that just evaporated most of the plane into liquid? - Boo-ya. The truth is that this kind of news broadcasting makes me sick. Bill O Reilly is a known biggot and racist, presenting a one sided (Republican of course), narrow minded view of what they want people to think happened.
A few things: 1. funny how of the last 100 or so comments, 1 or 2 support this video. 2. He lied about the collapse, it was free fall speed. 3. A building has never fallen like that before, it has always been asymmetrical, no matter how big it is. 4. He also lied about the engineers, thousands all over the world are as confused as the rest of us. 5. The truther's main argument is not the speed at which the buildings collapsed, it's building no. 7's caused by what seems to be nothing.(continued)
It's so obvious that Bill is so Fuckin bought! He's such a creap! I really believe that anyone who knows about 9/11 including Oprah, Is bought! Why is it nobody talkes about 9/11???I'm so surprised that building #7 lasted as long as it did!!! LMAO!!!!
You mother fuckin stupid sob's! Oh so the plane shrunk because it was going 500 miles an hour??? You are so wrong! And since when did journalist become so opioninated! Are we back in Mcarthyism?
The engines were not made of light weight steel and did not "TURN TO LIQUID" How stupid! Cm on James and Bill give it up, the party's over. Put down the cool aid and face the facts like I had to.
I am a republican and conservative, I voted for Bush but after a little research i have concluded that 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! Building 7 changed my mind.
It's the most studied collapse because it defied the laws. LoL, worst attempt at debunking. Tried to say that it's scientific facts, but just gave generic answers.
The only proof I needed that the towers fell too fast/controlled demo is the picture of one of the main metal beams sticking out of the ground with a clean diagonal break. You don't see these pictures often, because it's obvious that there was explosives involved. Also, if the fire was so intense that the fireball moved down the elevator shaft and caused an explosion in the lobby/basement, then how did all those people survive up top to jump like they did? They wouldn't have.
i tried using my cell phone in a plane a few weeks ago going to Boston...no luck with that...phone never worked...and my phone was not even fucked up....
Proof WTC Towers were demolished using explosives: 1. Pyroclastic clouds are formed after event 2. Secondary explosions caught on camera before collapse 3, Squibs seen at reinforced points of Towers 4.lobys of Towers destroyed before collapse 5. fell under 10 seconds 6. No evidence of Pancaked floors 7, Molten Metal Found At ALL 3 Towers. 8. Giant Steel Columns Blasted Hundreds of Feet Away. 9.Fires Burned for Months 10, 1100 Bodies Unaccounted for. 11, complete Destruction speaks for its self.
9/11 was sort of an inside job. It was ordered by the New World Order and the corrupt Bush administration did let it happen. The CIA made the Taliban and used them to bring the towers down for the 'war on terror' that will never end until America runs out of money to fund it. Then Russia or China gets to be the new global power until one day all nations unite under the New World Order.
this aint funny u dip stiks, the goverment or the pepole behind the curtain if u like are ppl with their on agenda and own motive...there human damn it meaning they are susseptable to greed and corrupution ...its simple follow their way or be taken out not physicaly but in a indirect way
wow..they marked you as spam b4 I could even get to you.I am Canadian,the one who helped you guys on 9/11/01..I was the the one who determined the towers will collapse..So You can just put me in the smarter then you class.more stronger....hmmm I think you have some living and learning to do.
all i am saying is you cant call more than 25% of the amrican population stupid without yourself being stupid you dont know me or any of those other people for that matter
Wow, both popular mechanics and Fox News fails. And no I haven't realize now.
"FACTS ARE FACTS." Until money is involved. Then you can change them and call yourself a scientist and call these claims facts. We need an INTERNATIONAL investigation on this matter. I mean the FACT that the American government itself will not allow an investigation is suspicious.
no matter what they do 911 is conspiracy you think that popular mechanic dumpster know more that thousand of people that study the WTC please!!!!! OH but he is popular mechanic chief editor we need to believe him what he saying he knows what he is talking rofl!!!!!!! i dont care if he is the popular mechanic chief editor., i know that there plan got wrong and they dint see this one coming. By the way those 2 kids have fun in your imagination you are very intelligent??? people.
wow...just wooooooooooooow...did any1 really believed that shit.. this is truly an insult to peoples intelligence..unless you are stupid enough to believe what they said...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I love the conspiracy kooks, who try and make themselves sound smart and have the attitude ,like they have seen beyond and everyone else are naive fools who just don't see the obvious.They are the worst type of Dumb. They are so dumb, they don't know there dumb .Your garden variety dumb person realizes they are poorly informed and keeps there mouth shut.
No I believe they mean ,educated men and women. You know, who understand things like load factors and metallurgy and structural support and Physics and Chemical engineering. You know Unimportant things like that. Not some guy who built his own deck once and is now going to tell us how only a controlled demolition could have brought them down. I love it when I hear Uneducated knuckle dragger using the term controlled demolition.
How these wanna be respectable televisions, like Fox News, CBS, CNN etc KEEP INSULT MY INTELIGENCE. New WORLD ORDER? What about a New WORLD REVOLUTION, PEOPLE?!
Just "IMAGINE" that! "You may say i am dreamer but i am not the only one" (like John Lennon use to say, but they killed)
Like Kennedy "the very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings" but they killed.
Kid, try and develop your own values and ideals. Don't look to pop Celebrities for them.Your writing is a cross between a Fortune cookie and a Madman.They killed him, both your Heroes were killed by Individuals, not groups.I am also a Lennon fan. But even Lennon said " we are just a Rock Band" and there is nothing wrong with that.Oh, I would not be Quoting a Kennedy in regards to keeping secrets. Grow up !
if any body beliefs this where did the plans pratt and whitney engines go did they just evaporate please watch "Steven Jones & Kevin Ryan Debunk the NIST Report part 1 of 2"
PM, how did the 19 hijacker's original database DNA get donated for I.D. purposes? Did it come from the universal - "Terra-ists R US"?? Wake up Bill and stop your audience from being "NotSees" (pronounced 'Nazis').....
What a load of crap from two of America's finest BS artists crop-dusting the sheeple with comforting words of wisdom. Great video of some REALLY dumb gentlemen.
The owner of populat mechanics is Hearst Corporation and have many business connections with the same bankers that stand to make a lot of money off the war on terror.
there was only 3 steel buildings in 100 years that fell due to fire?? all leased by the same man, all the same way, all in the same day?? the jet fuel doesn't melt steel, steel beams were angle cut, the buildings fell at free fall speed meaning nothing was below them if they fell on top of each other it would have taken 1 minute not 10 seconds and the steel core would have been present WAKE UP AMERICA.....
Debunk this...if the pentagon was hit by a real plane why has the government taken all the videos that showed it and has not released any, where were the two jet engines that hit the pentagon??? the physics, chemistry, of the world trade centers dont add up
ASJ, Bush sucks, I get it. But your propose tha becuae we don't have a solid image of the pent. crash that the real flight 77 is somewhere else, the hundreds of witnesses who saw a commercial plane hit the pent. are lying, DNA and body parts from the passengers were planted on the scene and parts of flight 77 were recovered. This was an unprecedented event and you people just want to believe that X-files is true
if the fire was so intense that it evaporated the plane how did you get DNA??? and we can solve the problem of having no video evidence by asking the pentagon to release one of the many videos they took away
Whoever used the term "evaporated the plane"? It's a poor decsription. Obliterated would be better as you can still find body parts. parts of all the passengers were identified (granted, rarely more than a fingertip). But, you people just have your smoking gun in the fact that there is not clear video footage. What about all the witnesses who saw a commercial plane strike the Pent?
so a freaking jumbo jet crashed to the pentagon with out leaving a scratch on the lawn and you did not find one piece of bodypart??? an arm, a finger, a toe??? "the witnesses" who saw it must have been on crack or are paid to say that, Like I said there is no video evidence because they took all the videos away from the cameras that showed that side of the pentagon, show me that video and I will believe the whole 9/11 conspiracy that said it was cavemen theory was true
Wow, so all the hundreds of peple who saw this American jetliner were liars or just paid off... okay dude, keep taking your medications. That is not a myth that human remains from all the passengers were recovered from the site. What don't you get about this? So you assume that the govt. mysteriously removed flight 77 and then struck the Pent. with a drone or missle (or whatever nutjob myth you morons endorse) and then planted DNA form the victims at the crash site? nice.
fuck your stupid NOT HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE SAW IT ASSHOLE, only a few say they saw it, like I said you dumb fuck, all they have to do is release one of those videos and I will believe that 9/11 was not an inside job
WE GET IT!!!!! You hate GWB...Your agenda is clear. Hate the government at your own expense not at the people that died that day. Just to put it in to perspective...They found DNA of the Space Shuttle crew that crashed. WHATS YOUR POINT?
When you learn the truth and observe the media they make it more and more obvious with the way they attack anything that challenges the official story
George Bush and his neo-con infested administration *DID* in fact stand aside and allow al queda attack our nation. They knew it was coming, they had a good idea of how it was coming, and they had some idea of when it would be coming and they absolutely without a doubt (it's written in ink and signed by many of them - see PNAC) WANTED it to happen. In order to enact their evil, ignorant, plans they NEEDED another Pearl Harbor and weren't about to get in the way of one that was clearly coming.
3. The FBI has been quick to confiscate and remain silent about MANY key pieces of evidence that could put many of these theories to rest, including simple traffic footage.
Now, I'm a realist. I'll never point a finger without reason. Do you not find any of this the least bit shady?
1. Fires don't quickly weaken steel. The WTC was the first steel-reinforced building to ever collapse from fire (in less than 10 mins I might add).
2. There is testimony from everyday American WTC employees that saved lives on 9/11 and survived the disaster saying there were sub-level explosions prior to the collision. They have been ignored outright by the "9/11 commission."
According to the Popular Mechanics magazine and engineering experts who have substantial scientific evidence, the Twin Towers collapsed due to the force of the plane hitting the buildings and destroying roughly 10 or so floors. Fires started and quickly weakened the remaining floors above thus enabling the kinetic energy of one floor collapsing first and then impacting on the floor beneath and so on.
So when a skyscraper is being demolished commercially by a demolition crew, why do they rig the entire building with explosives when it is scientifically proven (and proven visually 3 times on 9/11) that it is only necessary to rig 10 of the middle floors and kinetics will do the rest of the job perfectly. This would save demolition companies both a lot of time and money. The savings on man-power, man-hours and explosives would be enormous.
And before anyone answers that the planes rocked the foundations of the buildings remember that WC7 also fell without explosives, without any core damage, without planes hitting it and solely dues to kinetics.
Have a look at the footage of WTC 7 collapsing. No plane hit it, but it somehow caught fire and "collapsed". It took 6.5 secs for it to crumble. The twin towers took less than 10. These buildings fell at near free fall speed. Impossible, esspecially for steel buildings. they then made a pyroclastic cloud of dust which only form as result of explosion. But i guess the laws of physics took a day off on 9/11, right?
KingRamzes. Somehow caught fire? That's what happens when a building nearby throw debis all over it. And it took MORE than 6.5 secs for it to fall. Do research.
out of respect for everyone who died over this i think u should re-consider. And its not just these private documentaries, take a look at the photos and footage. Where are the planes? Did they just melt like popsicles? Bullshit.And as the building collapses you can see explosions popping out windows many floors below the point of destruction. Now THAT is evidence.
this is my last message. Why dont u jst try and put it all together? They found traces of thermite in the building and saw it reacting after the plane hit. its on EVERY VIDEO. jetfuel does not melt 4inch 30 ton steel beams, it needs to be 2700 F. there was no plane wreckage found at the pentagon or in shanksville. WTC building 7 collapsed and no planes hit it. Fire does not bring down steel. ITS A FACT THAT NOT A SINGLE STEEL BUILDING IN HISTORY COLLAPSED FROM FIRE.
I guess we are going to do away with the smelly fuck of Allah and his stinking slaves. Oh, Bin Laden, we will kill billions in your name. EXCUSE!!!! You handed an exuse to exterminate all who you hold dear.
ALL. ALL of Islam...And the best part is we will relish in your unborn...Fight hard now...Fight for your utter existence....This is The War...
No it couldnt, they can send a missile threw your window without it touching anything before the impact. Btw, You can not answer a statement that says:"Not even the best pilots in the world can achieve such a perfect "landing".....By saying:"Your forgeting that these people did take lessons to learn how to fly 757s"... It not only sounds stupied, its stupied. I asked one of closest relatives,
A mystery trader risks losing around $1 billion dollars after placing 245,000 put options on the Dow Jones Eurostoxx 50 index, leading many analysts to speculate that a stock market crash preceded by a new 9/11 style catastrophe could take place within the next month. aug 27th 2007 While yall are argueing over crap... there gonna do it again, and keep laughing all the way to the bank. and (unrelated) Meigs is a homo, its pretty obvious he may be the BJ boy at the grove.
both are fucking idiotic liars... if the wings were not strong enough to penetrate into the building, where are they? they broke off right? and then he says oh the hole was 90 feet wide? from what? the wings that you claim didnt penetrate? fucking idiot contradicted himself. and fuck you o'reilly, you dont know shit.
The man says that the wings were too weak to enter the building(Pentagon) yet they want us to beleave that they were not too soft to enter the WTC Towers! Go Figure!!
Here are the facts: The plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon was a Boeing 757. The official story says that it flew inches from the ground, at 500+ MPH before impact... so why is the lawn untouched??
The ground effect of a 757, going that fast, that close to the ground would be massive and would have done significant damage to the lawn. The video they released shows that what hit the Pentagon WAS inches from the ground. Therefore it is simply not possible that it was a 757.
Thank you, your point concerning "the lawn" of pentagon is VERY revealing. Not even the best pilots in the world can achieve such a perfect "landing". and the "free world media" wants ppl to believe that a psychopathic, suicidial group pulled it of...
You can see some very intressting pics at this site: myspacedotcom/mercversusnwo
No it couldnt, they can send a missile threw your window without it touching anything before. Btw, You can not answer a statement that says:"Not even the best pilots in the world can achieve such a perfect "landing".....By saying:"Your forgeting that these people did take lessons to learn how to fly 757s"... It not only sounds stupied, its stupied. I asked one of closest relatives,
It doesnt take a pilot to understand that by the plane crashing thru 4 or 5 street lights that debris would fall off and the plane would probably crash before hitting the pentagon. They say it flew at extremely low altitude over the HIGHWAY and NO ONE saw it, except for one guy who so conveniently happens to be found by FOX News.
Yes. People reported seeing and hearing the missile, heard and felt the explosion. People in the area of the attacks who were Veterans reported the smell of cordite, which is missile fuel.
I you watch September Clues it will even show you proof. It shows the missile path. It also shows the impossible sudden appearance of a plane on CNN. The camera was zoomed out, no plane. Then the camera zooms in and 5 secondds later a plane appears from nowhere. The camera would have caught it while it was zoomed out.
Yea? What about the people who were actually there? I guess you know more than them. Wat are you an expert on these things? You sound like just another sheep who believes the media on everything and who cant handle the truth. Sept clues includes the same video thousands of americans recorded in their vcr that day and it applies physics to attack. Therefore if Sept Clues is fake, i guess everone recorded the same thing by coincidence!
Were you there? You can find people who will take any point on any issue. I refuse to believe that this was an inside job, and so does the mass majority of Americans. So keep thinking this was an inside job. You only make me laugh.
Actually the number of americans who believe it is growing and stands at 30%. You wana talk majorities i can tell you majority of this country dispises bush and is unsatisfied with his efforts in Iraq, so there ya go. Also, no i wasnt there but i apply common sense with the disclosed reality of it and professional engineers (some from MIT) proved the collapse to be physically impossible. You cant argue with physics. The media is owned by the gov. just like your simple head.
The media is very liberal. (Not Fox) I'm sorry but something like this has never happened before so you cannot determine everything that happened. Like I said polls can be made to say what they want.
when u have both sides giving u the same poll with the same number then u know its real. its something to report about. and money talks. so being liberal or conservative doesnt matter. Did u ever realize that the only ppl to witness the crash at the pentagon were reporters?
No he was not 10 minutes away he admits to seeing it crash! I DID my research, u didnt! He is on tape on youtube admitting it! And a couple media networks said they had eye witnesses say they saw missiles hit the buildings, whether u want to believe it or not. some ppl even smelled cordite. Now, im not gonna be ignorant and say it definately was but there are no black box recordings for either flight and the wreckage was never found. not of a single plane.
PLEASE just research this at least. They found molten iron all over the place. Iron wasnt used in the construction of th buildings, steel was. Molten iron is a bi-product of thermite. Thermite is used in demolitions to blow apart steel beams/joints which would have to be done for the buildings to collapse. Thremnite is the only thing besides a blast furnace that can melt steel. Not even LAVA can melt it. Lava burns at 1500 F. Steel melts at 2700 F. Jetfuel burns at 1700 F at its HOTTEST.
Where did you find all of your "proof?" Not just this post the others as well. Don't tell me September Clues, something else. Look at the others side of the debate. I have it was ignorant and short sided.
Several different sources, but September clues is the most well-constructed. Thre are many private documentaries on everything about it - from years before until now. Also 911Truth and Scolars for 911 And they all make sense. The 911 Commission Report has so many holes its ridiculous. Every time Bush is asked about 911 at his press conferences he either freezes, avoids the question by not answering, or gets defensive. Its obvious.
You should also consider the fact that most of the families of the ppl who died in those buildings want answers and dont believe the governments story one bit. THEY went to the hearings for Rice's, Bush's, and Cheney's testimony and didnt believe them. Who has the right to criticize them? You laugh at me, you laugh at them. And if you laugh at them, you obviously dont care wat happened that day, u just want to watch a war unleash.
chaoscleaner. doesn't the NASA fly over which shows temps highers then airplane fuel will ever burn, even in an oxygen rich environment, prove that there was secondary explosives (like steal cutting thermate). These temps recorded 6 weeks after 9/11 match that of molten steel.
u want proof it was molten iron? cuz there is so much proof out there. Youre the one who needs to do research. I bet u dont even try cuz u cant handle the truth.
September clues compares all the angles that show the paths of the planes. Some of the paths when compared to others dont match at all. And some videos, supposedly, have footage of the missile. Watch September Clues. Watch part one and 2 at least and you will see. Watch as many videos as you can and you will see all the evidence. i mean, cmon. Arabs with boxcutters took over 4 planes? FOUR PLANES?? ARE YOU THAT FRIGGIN GULLIBLE? BOXCUTTERS??????????!!!
"it means that the people posting on these sites don't always know it all as you obviously trust they do"
i never said that they do know it all. please think about what you're saying next time you before you post a reply to comments. so just from your comment, you can basically conclude that there is no real fact or source out there because obviously "people posting on these sites don't always know it all". LOL
the video loosechange admits that the telephone conversations only lasted a few sentances so its not as if they ahd full conversations up there. BTW what would be the point of faking telephone conversations.
Yes, they did. But not after the FBI confiscated them and refused to release them to the public until a few months afterwards. I'm not saying that it's 100% conspiracy or 100% not a conspiracy, but the FBI COULD'VE (not a definite yes that they did)tampered with the recordings.
Did you know that bush didn't allow investigation of 911 until more than a year after it happened?
The recordings were made public a few months after 911, before the investigation was even started. But there was still enough time for the recordings to be fixed, if they were.
Thats a lie. They may of looked into it a bit more a year after but the investigation was started only a day later. Investigation meaning. Trying to find out more about what happend more deeply.
And the "story" that you're referring to is the official story that the government told the people. Why do you think Congress is planning on a new investigation on 911? The official story doesn't add up, that's why.
Id put some money on it that i have done more research than you. Thats a speculative comment that you think i have not done any research. What you CTers need to do is quit playing he said she said and go to the orginal sources instead of these 911 was inside job sites. How about you do some REAL research.
HAHAHAHA, 1) when I said "Please research before you reply to my comments.", I didn't mean that you didn't do ANY research at all. 2) you're probably right that you've done more research than me, but that doesn't mean that you went to the right sources. I'm saying that the same way that anti-CTs like you accuse CTers going to "CT sites" for info and that they're not reliable. 3) i'm not a CT myself, even tho many say that I sound like one. I'm just looking for answers.
No no no no no. What im saying is dont go to a "9-11 is an inside job site" Because many of them are unreliable. HEll dont go to a debunking 911 site. Go to factual sources. Like one 9-11 site claimed that the commision report had an appendix talking about molten steel being found. I went to the exact copy of the commision report and it said nothing of the sort. If there is an actual fact taht prooves the 9-11 theory i would accept it.
I'm not trying to start a fight but I just want to know the truth. If the sources that you said I get my info from is wrong then please, give me a link to some reliable sources that presents true facts. I'm not for either side of the argument between 911 being an inside job or not, I just ask a lot of questions, that's all.
he, lol, this looks like psyops.."The cell phones work absolutely alright. There's no need to worry. Be cool, your president has everything under controle (literally, or is it dick cheney?), the wtc came down as planned (oops) and everything is completey logically explainable. Gullible sheeple, oh, right. The internet sparks a bunch of paranoid nerds everytime a plane crashes...Righteo.
fact, smoking pot causes people to be paranoid...so stop smoking dope and you won't have to fear your own gov't. If they want you dead, they would of done it by now.
its sad because it disproves your theory. Why dont you try and rebuttle the debunkers instead of calling names and changing the subject and saying its sad?
Did you hear that everyone? Fox News and their experts say that we have absolutely nothing to worry about. The governemnt makes decisions in our best interests. Yea right.
Ask yourself... What would the Bush administration accomplished during his term if the 9/11 attacks had never happened? Would he still have the same agenda?
the best in the interest for the iraqis, the afghani people....the americans. Well, sure, the govt obviously nas no trubble whatsoever concerning dealing with conspiracy theorists... Just lock em away, as they always do ^^
The dont even go over all the facts/theories. They picked the easiest ones to debunk which the did a poor job of doing
tommadethatup 2 months ago
There were "three towers" that fell that day. Why do they continue to just focuse on the main two especially after the owner of the towers admitted that he gave the New York Fire Chief the o.k for them "pull it". The tower collapsed the same way as the first two but still they want to deny that there were bombs planted.
mror3okooki3 4 months ago
Its not a matter of scientific evidence you government payed off nerd fuck. "Facts are facts" sure buddy, its based on politics not your science which im sure is valid
benny7690 4 months ago
The Boeing company said the hole of the Pentagon was big enough to know it was a 757.
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
The only thing their flawed science prooves is all you need to bring a building down for cheap is an aeroplane loaded with fuel and with medium size buildings hey its even easier just some jet fuel and it dont even have to burn that hot. Best thing about doing it this way is the buildings come straight down in a nice tidy pile. Constant media and adverts are full of crap turning people into zombies.
rst570 1 year ago
Comment removed
amy2x 1 year ago 20
@amy2x yes way it did.
judgerofwars 7 months ago
Those nutty professors, and nutty physicists, kooky engineers, and zany wacky demolition experts who wouldn't know demolition if it slapped 'em in the twin towers.....
Good thing we have a nerd who writes for a fluff magazine here to set 'em all straight.
punkeratheart 1 year ago
It's been debunked. Time and time again. 36% of people are also fucking stupid. Pathetic...
jschwind435 1 year ago
The level of manipulation of the mainstream media in the US is staggering, yet SO see-through. I say this without insult to Americans, but the incredibly patronizing, one-sided tone of the major stations is almost infantile. Who the hell trusts this crap? Even in this short clip, there are errors and untruths that ten minutes online will expose, all delivered in that "you're nuts if you think different" manner. It's literally theft of the minds of so many people willing to trust in it.
CodeTwo2 1 year ago
popular mechanics - subsidized by the department of homeland security.
xnothingbutthetruth 2 years ago 2
Bill O'reilly is a neocon liar. Many of the floors of building 7 fell at freefall speed. This man being interviewed is an absolute liar. The engineers are DEFINITELY NOT supporting the governments reports. There were no wings, tail sections, nor titanium engines found at the Pentagon. He says every major plane crash leads to conspiracy theories. Really? Wow I have never of any before 9/11. These people are the ones who try and disinform the public. Dont be dumbed down by the media.
buddyfreakinholly 2 years ago 3
U nano mous?
Thin aluminum and fuel left a cartoon imprint on the towers?
meigs = government shill
o'reilly = government shill
jag10 2 years ago 3
Holy propaganda
Prophsmag 2 years ago 3
6. It is scientifically impossible for metal to turn to liquid at those temperatures, whatever the speed. 7. Even if it did, how did they find a passport just lying there unscathed from the same fire that just evaporated most of the plane into liquid? - Boo-ya. The truth is that this kind of news broadcasting makes me sick. Bill O Reilly is a known biggot and racist, presenting a one sided (Republican of course), narrow minded view of what they want people to think happened.
ruaidhri777 2 years ago 2
A few things: 1. funny how of the last 100 or so comments, 1 or 2 support this video. 2. He lied about the collapse, it was free fall speed. 3. A building has never fallen like that before, it has always been asymmetrical, no matter how big it is. 4. He also lied about the engineers, thousands all over the world are as confused as the rest of us. 5. The truther's main argument is not the speed at which the buildings collapsed, it's building no. 7's caused by what seems to be nothing.(continued)
ruaidhri777 2 years ago
It's so obvious that Bill is so Fuckin bought! He's such a creap! I really believe that anyone who knows about 9/11 including Oprah, Is bought! Why is it nobody talkes about 9/11???I'm so surprised that building #7 lasted as long as it did!!! LMAO!!!!
wayngro68 2 years ago
You mother fuckin stupid sob's! Oh so the plane shrunk because it was going 500 miles an hour??? You are so wrong! And since when did journalist become so opioninated! Are we back in Mcarthyism?
wayngro68 2 years ago
The engines were not made of light weight steel and did not "TURN TO LIQUID" How stupid! Cm on James and Bill give it up, the party's over. Put down the cool aid and face the facts like I had to.
MrBullfrog9876 2 years ago
I am a republican and conservative, I voted for Bush but after a little research i have concluded that 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! Building 7 changed my mind.
MrBullfrog9876 2 years ago
the plane hitting the pentagon went to liquid ????? what the fuck !!! hahaha lol
Who are these CLOWNS...
36% OF AMERICANS KNOW THE TRUTH
bill oreily....what a fucken puppet....
explain the use of thermite?
explain what hit the pentagon,because a plane DIDN'T?
explain what brought down tower 7?
tower 7 was the headquarters of the F.B.I AND THE C.I.A........funny that..
as people can see for themselves.....biggest INSIDE JOB EVER..
markhsv 2 years ago
building 7........ a building no where even close to the world trade collapsed
how? molten metal in the bottom of debris for days after
ENOUGH SAID
irishjoker4794 2 years ago 2
It's the most studied collapse because it defied the laws. LoL, worst attempt at debunking. Tried to say that it's scientific facts, but just gave generic answers.
Yerizzo 2 years ago
The only proof I needed that the towers fell too fast/controlled demo is the picture of one of the main metal beams sticking out of the ground with a clean diagonal break. You don't see these pictures often, because it's obvious that there was explosives involved. Also, if the fire was so intense that the fireball moved down the elevator shaft and caused an explosion in the lobby/basement, then how did all those people survive up top to jump like they did? They wouldn't have.
xStacinatorx 2 years ago 2
Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Corporation, the father of yellow journalism.
FastBrian1 2 years ago
i tried using my cell phone in a plane a few weeks ago going to Boston...no luck with that...phone never worked...and my phone was not even fucked up....
burgersforreal 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TruthLogic 2 years ago
9/11 was sort of an inside job. It was ordered by the New World Order and the corrupt Bush administration did let it happen. The CIA made the Taliban and used them to bring the towers down for the 'war on terror' that will never end until America runs out of money to fund it. Then Russia or China gets to be the new global power until one day all nations unite under the New World Order.
residentzombie 2 years ago 5
this aint funny u dip stiks, the goverment or the pepole behind the curtain if u like are ppl with their on agenda and own motive...there human damn it meaning they are susseptable to greed and corrupution ...its simple follow their way or be taken out not physicaly but in a indirect way
shoxman123 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
911 was an inside job!
log140 2 years ago
fuking cunt liars! they are just whores of the government!
djbazia 2 years ago 4
fckn liers...
Michael1986m 2 years ago 2
FUCKIN LIER !!! THIS IS BULL CRAP !!
thugnappy69 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Conspiracy people are idiots.
AmericasFan 3 years ago
hmmm 36% of Americans beleive this????????Does it mean 36% of Americans are stupid?
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no it means your stupid
frankthetankxx 2 years ago
wow..they marked you as spam b4 I could even get to you.I am Canadian,the one who helped you guys on 9/11/01..I was the the one who determined the towers will collapse..So You can just put me in the smarter then you class.more stronger....hmmm I think you have some living and learning to do.
blueshadow1996 2 years ago
all i am saying is you cant call more than 25% of the amrican population stupid without yourself being stupid you dont know me or any of those other people for that matter
frankthetankxx 2 years ago
I am sorry...I was remebering when Cartman from "south Park" was investigating 911 and he mentioned the poll numbers.
blueshadow1996 2 years ago
Wow, both popular mechanics and Fox News fails. And no I haven't realize now.
"FACTS ARE FACTS." Until money is involved. Then you can change them and call yourself a scientist and call these claims facts. We need an INTERNATIONAL investigation on this matter. I mean the FACT that the American government itself will not allow an investigation is suspicious.
CsalbertCs 3 years ago 2
wake up; educate yourself; look up the "investigators" who "investigated."
NaughtySchoolGirls 3 years ago
Who the hell is he to say what is garbage? 99% if it comes out of his own mouth!!!
Jendaminnx 3 years ago
i hate bill o reilly, he has no concscience. the 4th reich/new world order is well under way, educate yourselves
istofe21 3 years ago
it's so funny how people like you say "educate yourself"
zmoore83 3 years ago
no matter what they do 911 is conspiracy you think that popular mechanic dumpster know more that thousand of people that study the WTC please!!!!! OH but he is popular mechanic chief editor we need to believe him what he saying he knows what he is talking rofl!!!!!!! i dont care if he is the popular mechanic chief editor., i know that there plan got wrong and they dint see this one coming. By the way those 2 kids have fun in your imagination you are very intelligent??? people.
WolfRage 3 years ago
i really want to believe this guy, but i've tried to use my phone in the air and got zero signal.
drpax 3 years ago
wow...just wooooooooooooow...did any1 really believed that shit.. this is truly an insult to peoples intelligence..unless you are stupid enough to believe what they said...
Gregk82 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I love the conspiracy kooks, who try and make themselves sound smart and have the attitude ,like they have seen beyond and everyone else are naive fools who just don't see the obvious.They are the worst type of Dumb. They are so dumb, they don't know there dumb .Your garden variety dumb person realizes they are poorly informed and keeps there mouth shut.
rich107s 3 years ago
they work fine ...... total bull
IAMDOPED 3 years ago
what engeneer community? D: the santa toy factory?
Kasosdri 3 years ago
No I believe they mean ,educated men and women. You know, who understand things like load factors and metallurgy and structural support and Physics and Chemical engineering. You know Unimportant things like that. Not some guy who built his own deck once and is now going to tell us how only a controlled demolition could have brought them down. I love it when I hear Uneducated knuckle dragger using the term controlled demolition.
rich107s 3 years ago
How these wanna be respectable televisions, like Fox News, CBS, CNN etc KEEP INSULT MY INTELIGENCE. New WORLD ORDER? What about a New WORLD REVOLUTION, PEOPLE?!
Just "IMAGINE" that! "You may say i am dreamer but i am not the only one" (like John Lennon use to say, but they killed)
Like Kennedy "the very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings" but they killed.
secretarul 3 years ago
That almost made sense, if you speak like a caveman.
spacetowel 3 years ago 2
Kid, try and develop your own values and ideals. Don't look to pop Celebrities for them.Your writing is a cross between a Fortune cookie and a Madman.They killed him, both your Heroes were killed by Individuals, not groups.I am also a Lennon fan. But even Lennon said " we are just a Rock Band" and there is nothing wrong with that.Oh, I would not be Quoting a Kennedy in regards to keeping secrets. Grow up !
rich107s 3 years ago
Hey you wanna be RICH Boy ! STOP TALKIN SHIT before i give you a slap !
Who think that Kennedy it was killed by an individual is a mad man !
I assume that you use your minimum logics to understand that these events are very well orchestrated by GROUPS !
It's like telling that the guy who burn the Reichstag is QUILTY for the WW2 !!!
The stakes are to high for your cheap assumtions boy !
secretarul 3 years ago
Media disgusts me a lot
RasgaSaias 3 years ago 3
Why does Bill care about "scientific evidence" when he himself rejects evolution and believes in creationism? fucking retard...
sp1r1c0m 3 years ago 3
lies lies lies,
if any body beliefs this where did the plans pratt and whitney engines go did they just evaporate please watch "Steven Jones & Kevin Ryan Debunk the NIST Report part 1 of 2"
westmayor 3 years ago 2
PM, how did the 19 hijacker's original database DNA get donated for I.D. purposes? Did it come from the universal - "Terra-ists R US"?? Wake up Bill and stop your audience from being "NotSees" (pronounced 'Nazis').....
Getsen42 3 years ago
What a load of crap from two of America's finest BS artists crop-dusting the sheeple with comforting words of wisdom. Great video of some REALLY dumb gentlemen.
tarheeltim32 3 years ago 3
Why?
bbkingzor 3 years ago
Why are they dumb*** ?
bbkingzor 3 years ago
popular mechanics are knobs. and 36% is a lie,. its more 90%
Dynamicdj 4 years ago 8
They call that disinfo
Petrolhead1984 4 years ago
The owner of populat mechanics is Hearst Corporation and have many business connections with the same bankers that stand to make a lot of money off the war on terror.
flavour54 4 years ago 3
these guys are full of shit
ele331 4 years ago
Answer this then....How come the Pentagon did not collapsed? 3 other buildings did! Including WTC 7 that wasn't even hit! James Meigs is ridiculous!
Somebodyloveall 4 years ago
The Pentagon is not a highrise steel structure dumbfuck nor was it constructed anywhere close to the same. Your ridiculous!
gidsum29 4 years ago
there was only 3 steel buildings in 100 years that fell due to fire?? all leased by the same man, all the same way, all in the same day?? the jet fuel doesn't melt steel, steel beams were angle cut, the buildings fell at free fall speed meaning nothing was below them if they fell on top of each other it would have taken 1 minute not 10 seconds and the steel core would have been present WAKE UP AMERICA.....
ASJChaotic 4 years ago
Debunk this...if the pentagon was hit by a real plane why has the government taken all the videos that showed it and has not released any, where were the two jet engines that hit the pentagon??? the physics, chemistry, of the world trade centers dont add up
ASJChaotic 4 years ago
ASJ, Bush sucks, I get it. But your propose tha becuae we don't have a solid image of the pent. crash that the real flight 77 is somewhere else, the hundreds of witnesses who saw a commercial plane hit the pent. are lying, DNA and body parts from the passengers were planted on the scene and parts of flight 77 were recovered. This was an unprecedented event and you people just want to believe that X-files is true
mulax01 4 years ago
if the fire was so intense that it evaporated the plane how did you get DNA??? and we can solve the problem of having no video evidence by asking the pentagon to release one of the many videos they took away
ASJChaotic 4 years ago
Whoever used the term "evaporated the plane"? It's a poor decsription. Obliterated would be better as you can still find body parts. parts of all the passengers were identified (granted, rarely more than a fingertip). But, you people just have your smoking gun in the fact that there is not clear video footage. What about all the witnesses who saw a commercial plane strike the Pent?
mulax01 4 years ago
so a freaking jumbo jet crashed to the pentagon with out leaving a scratch on the lawn and you did not find one piece of bodypart??? an arm, a finger, a toe??? "the witnesses" who saw it must have been on crack or are paid to say that, Like I said there is no video evidence because they took all the videos away from the cameras that showed that side of the pentagon, show me that video and I will believe the whole 9/11 conspiracy that said it was cavemen theory was true
ASJChaotic 4 years ago
Wow, so all the hundreds of peple who saw this American jetliner were liars or just paid off... okay dude, keep taking your medications. That is not a myth that human remains from all the passengers were recovered from the site. What don't you get about this? So you assume that the govt. mysteriously removed flight 77 and then struck the Pent. with a drone or missle (or whatever nutjob myth you morons endorse) and then planted DNA form the victims at the crash site? nice.
mulax01 4 years ago
fuck your stupid NOT HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE SAW IT ASSHOLE, only a few say they saw it, like I said you dumb fuck, all they have to do is release one of those videos and I will believe that 9/11 was not an inside job
ASJChaotic 4 years ago
WE GET IT!!!!! You hate GWB...Your agenda is clear. Hate the government at your own expense not at the people that died that day. Just to put it in to perspective...They found DNA of the Space Shuttle crew that crashed. WHATS YOUR POINT?
gidsum29 4 years ago
"Every major plane crash raises conspiracy theories"
WTF? These guys are the kings of yellow journalism then and now.
BusBoyIsBack 4 years ago
When you learn the truth and observe the media they make it more and more obvious with the way they attack anything that challenges the official story
BusBoyIsBack 4 years ago
no it was an inside job
bobo480 4 years ago
George Bush and his neo-con infested administration *DID* in fact stand aside and allow al queda attack our nation. They knew it was coming, they had a good idea of how it was coming, and they had some idea of when it would be coming and they absolutely without a doubt (it's written in ink and signed by many of them - see PNAC) WANTED it to happen. In order to enact their evil, ignorant, plans they NEEDED another Pearl Harbor and weren't about to get in the way of one that was clearly coming.
EmeraldView 4 years ago
3. The FBI has been quick to confiscate and remain silent about MANY key pieces of evidence that could put many of these theories to rest, including simple traffic footage.
Now, I'm a realist. I'll never point a finger without reason. Do you not find any of this the least bit shady?
TitoDaMan 4 years ago
1. Fires don't quickly weaken steel. The WTC was the first steel-reinforced building to ever collapse from fire (in less than 10 mins I might add).
2. There is testimony from everyday American WTC employees that saved lives on 9/11 and survived the disaster saying there were sub-level explosions prior to the collision. They have been ignored outright by the "9/11 commission."
TitoDaMan 4 years ago
According to the Popular Mechanics magazine and engineering experts who have substantial scientific evidence, the Twin Towers collapsed due to the force of the plane hitting the buildings and destroying roughly 10 or so floors. Fires started and quickly weakened the remaining floors above thus enabling the kinetic energy of one floor collapsing first and then impacting on the floor beneath and so on.
PEANTONG 4 years ago 2
The gathering kinetics of which providing the force to push down and make the entire building collapse in the so-called pancake effect.
This is scientifically proven. Kinetics exist. So does the pancake effect.
Popular Mechanics tell people that they cannot make myths up out of proven fact.
Ok, so we MUST accept that, proven by fact, a skyscraper can fall into its own footprint with no need for explosives.
PEANTONG 4 years ago
So when a skyscraper is being demolished commercially by a demolition crew, why do they rig the entire building with explosives when it is scientifically proven (and proven visually 3 times on 9/11) that it is only necessary to rig 10 of the middle floors and kinetics will do the rest of the job perfectly. This would save demolition companies both a lot of time and money. The savings on man-power, man-hours and explosives would be enormous.
PEANTONG 4 years ago
So why do they not do this?
And before anyone answers that the planes rocked the foundations of the buildings remember that WC7 also fell without explosives, without any core damage, without planes hitting it and solely dues to kinetics.
PEANTONG 4 years ago
there's 4 min of my life I can't get back
the911gamer 4 years ago
th911gamer. Really... Me too.
chaoscleaner 4 years ago
Have a look at the footage of WTC 7 collapsing. No plane hit it, but it somehow caught fire and "collapsed". It took 6.5 secs for it to crumble. The twin towers took less than 10. These buildings fell at near free fall speed. Impossible, esspecially for steel buildings. they then made a pyroclastic cloud of dust which only form as result of explosion. But i guess the laws of physics took a day off on 9/11, right?
KingRamzes 4 years ago
KingRamzes. Somehow caught fire? That's what happens when a building nearby throw debis all over it. And it took MORE than 6.5 secs for it to fall. Do research.
chaoscleaner 4 years ago
out of respect for everyone who died over this i think u should re-consider. And its not just these private documentaries, take a look at the photos and footage. Where are the planes? Did they just melt like popsicles? Bullshit.And as the building collapses you can see explosions popping out windows many floors below the point of destruction. Now THAT is evidence.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
give me a break.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
this is my last message. Why dont u jst try and put it all together? They found traces of thermite in the building and saw it reacting after the plane hit. its on EVERY VIDEO. jetfuel does not melt 4inch 30 ton steel beams, it needs to be 2700 F. there was no plane wreckage found at the pentagon or in shanksville. WTC building 7 collapsed and no planes hit it. Fire does not bring down steel. ITS A FACT THAT NOT A SINGLE STEEL BUILDING IN HISTORY COLLAPSED FROM FIRE.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
I guess we are going to do away with the smelly fuck of Allah and his stinking slaves. Oh, Bin Laden, we will kill billions in your name. EXCUSE!!!! You handed an exuse to exterminate all who you hold dear.
ALL. ALL of Islam...And the best part is we will relish in your unborn...Fight hard now...Fight for your utter existence....This is The War...
mfp508 4 years ago
listen to that bullshit: plane as it hit the pentagon turned into liquid..
drfahoodi 4 years ago
911 Was a Inside Job-TV fakery was used..Watch September Clues...Parts 1-7..
911mythbusters 4 years ago
No it couldnt, they can send a missile threw your window without it touching anything before the impact. Btw, You can not answer a statement that says:"Not even the best pilots in the world can achieve such a perfect "landing".....By saying:"Your forgeting that these people did take lessons to learn how to fly 757s"... It not only sounds stupied, its stupied. I asked one of closest relatives,
who has been pilot for 35 years about this..
Farshad1975 4 years ago
A mystery trader risks losing around $1 billion dollars after placing 245,000 put options on the Dow Jones Eurostoxx 50 index, leading many analysts to speculate that a stock market crash preceded by a new 9/11 style catastrophe could take place within the next month. aug 27th 2007 While yall are argueing over crap... there gonna do it again, and keep laughing all the way to the bank. and (unrelated) Meigs is a homo, its pretty obvious he may be the BJ boy at the grove.
debunkthis2 4 years ago
both are fucking idiotic liars... if the wings were not strong enough to penetrate into the building, where are they? they broke off right? and then he says oh the hole was 90 feet wide? from what? the wings that you claim didnt penetrate? fucking idiot contradicted himself. and fuck you o'reilly, you dont know shit.
lebroniznumba1 4 years ago
Bill is telling the truth? Holy shit Bill is telling the truth!
rjbonacolta 4 years ago
The man says that the wings were too weak to enter the building(Pentagon) yet they want us to beleave that they were not too soft to enter the WTC Towers! Go Figure!!
911mythbusters 4 years ago
"The engineering community is unanimous" FLAT OUT LIE!!
WhyNotTruth 4 years ago
Here are the facts: The plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon was a Boeing 757. The official story says that it flew inches from the ground, at 500+ MPH before impact... so why is the lawn untouched??
The ground effect of a 757, going that fast, that close to the ground would be massive and would have done significant damage to the lawn. The video they released shows that what hit the Pentagon WAS inches from the ground. Therefore it is simply not possible that it was a 757.
WhyNotTruth 4 years ago
Thank you, your point concerning "the lawn" of pentagon is VERY revealing. Not even the best pilots in the world can achieve such a perfect "landing". and the "free world media" wants ppl to believe that a psychopathic, suicidial group pulled it of...
You can see some very intressting pics at this site: myspacedotcom/mercversusnwo
Farshad1975 4 years ago
Your forgeting that these people did take lessons to learn how to fly 757s. Also if a missle hit it wouldn't there still be damage to the lawn?
Akroma08 4 years ago
No it couldnt, they can send a missile threw your window without it touching anything before. Btw, You can not answer a statement that says:"Not even the best pilots in the world can achieve such a perfect "landing".....By saying:"Your forgeting that these people did take lessons to learn how to fly 757s"... It not only sounds stupied, its stupied. I asked one of closest relatives,
who has been pilot for 35 years about this..
Farshad1975 4 years ago
They aren't landing. Oh are you the worlds most perfect pilot? Excuse me.
Akroma08 4 years ago
It doesnt take a pilot to understand that by the plane crashing thru 4 or 5 street lights that debris would fall off and the plane would probably crash before hitting the pentagon. They say it flew at extremely low altitude over the HIGHWAY and NO ONE saw it, except for one guy who so conveniently happens to be found by FOX News.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
Did anyone see a missle? Didn't think so.
Akroma08 4 years ago
Yes. People reported seeing and hearing the missile, heard and felt the explosion. People in the area of the attacks who were Veterans reported the smell of cordite, which is missile fuel.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
I you watch September Clues it will even show you proof. It shows the missile path. It also shows the impossible sudden appearance of a plane on CNN. The camera was zoomed out, no plane. Then the camera zooms in and 5 secondds later a plane appears from nowhere. The camera would have caught it while it was zoomed out.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
You are right TV can be faked. Your "September Clues" certainly is.
Akroma08 4 years ago
Yea? What about the people who were actually there? I guess you know more than them. Wat are you an expert on these things? You sound like just another sheep who believes the media on everything and who cant handle the truth. Sept clues includes the same video thousands of americans recorded in their vcr that day and it applies physics to attack. Therefore if Sept Clues is fake, i guess everone recorded the same thing by coincidence!
KingRamzes 4 years ago
Were you there? You can find people who will take any point on any issue. I refuse to believe that this was an inside job, and so does the mass majority of Americans. So keep thinking this was an inside job. You only make me laugh.
Akroma08 4 years ago
Actually the number of americans who believe it is growing and stands at 30%. You wana talk majorities i can tell you majority of this country dispises bush and is unsatisfied with his efforts in Iraq, so there ya go. Also, no i wasnt there but i apply common sense with the disclosed reality of it and professional engineers (some from MIT) proved the collapse to be physically impossible. You cant argue with physics. The media is owned by the gov. just like your simple head.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
The media is very liberal. (Not Fox) I'm sorry but something like this has never happened before so you cannot determine everything that happened. Like I said polls can be made to say what they want.
Akroma08 4 years ago
when u have both sides giving u the same poll with the same number then u know its real. its something to report about. and money talks. so being liberal or conservative doesnt matter. Did u ever realize that the only ppl to witness the crash at the pentagon were reporters?
KingRamzes 4 years ago
thats besides the so called "gaurd" that was flying around when it happened and just so happened to not shoot it down
KingRamzes 4 years ago
Yeah he was 10 min. away. Do your research on it.
Akroma08 4 years ago
Where are you getting this from? Am I supposed to take your word for it? Did anyone see a missle?
Akroma08 4 years ago
No he was not 10 minutes away he admits to seeing it crash! I DID my research, u didnt! He is on tape on youtube admitting it! And a couple media networks said they had eye witnesses say they saw missiles hit the buildings, whether u want to believe it or not. some ppl even smelled cordite. Now, im not gonna be ignorant and say it definately was but there are no black box recordings for either flight and the wreckage was never found. not of a single plane.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
PLEASE just research this at least. They found molten iron all over the place. Iron wasnt used in the construction of th buildings, steel was. Molten iron is a bi-product of thermite. Thermite is used in demolitions to blow apart steel beams/joints which would have to be done for the buildings to collapse. Thremnite is the only thing besides a blast furnace that can melt steel. Not even LAVA can melt it. Lava burns at 1500 F. Steel melts at 2700 F. Jetfuel burns at 1700 F at its HOTTEST.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
Where did you find all of your "proof?" Not just this post the others as well. Don't tell me September Clues, something else. Look at the others side of the debate. I have it was ignorant and short sided.
Akroma08 4 years ago
Several different sources, but September clues is the most well-constructed. Thre are many private documentaries on everything about it - from years before until now. Also 911Truth and Scolars for 911 And they all make sense. The 911 Commission Report has so many holes its ridiculous. Every time Bush is asked about 911 at his press conferences he either freezes, avoids the question by not answering, or gets defensive. Its obvious.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
You should also consider the fact that most of the families of the ppl who died in those buildings want answers and dont believe the governments story one bit. THEY went to the hearings for Rice's, Bush's, and Cheney's testimony and didnt believe them. Who has the right to criticize them? You laugh at me, you laugh at them. And if you laugh at them, you obviously dont care wat happened that day, u just want to watch a war unleash.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
KingRamzes. (I'm not picking on you, really.) How about "most of the families" of the people in the planes? Did they show up as well?
chaoscleaner 4 years ago
"chaoscleaner", isn't that name kind of close in meaning to "order out of chaos". Humm?
the911gamer 4 years ago
the911gamer: er....No, but thanks for playing. :)
chaoscleaner 4 years ago
chaoscleaner. er...yes, I think it is.
the911gamer 4 years ago
the911gamer: Makes no difference to me or the real meaning behind it. [g]
chaoscleaner 4 years ago
chaoscleaner. At least you can admit you're ignorant.
the911gamer 4 years ago
911gamer: Sorry. You're right. I was ignorant in my response. I meant to say it made no difference to me, what YOU thought it meant.
chaoscleaner 4 years ago
I think that goes without saying.
the911gamer 4 years ago
Please, King. Stop the SPECULATION. Show PROOF it was molten iron.
chaoscleaner 4 years ago
chaoscleaner. doesn't the NASA fly over which shows temps highers then airplane fuel will ever burn, even in an oxygen rich environment, prove that there was secondary explosives (like steal cutting thermate). These temps recorded 6 weeks after 9/11 match that of molten steel.
the911gamer 4 years ago
u want proof it was molten iron? cuz there is so much proof out there. Youre the one who needs to do research. I bet u dont even try cuz u cant handle the truth.
KingRamzes 4 years ago
September clues compares all the angles that show the paths of the planes. Some of the paths when compared to others dont match at all. And some videos, supposedly, have footage of the missile. Watch September Clues. Watch part one and 2 at least and you will see. Watch as many videos as you can and you will see all the evidence. i mean, cmon. Arabs with boxcutters took over 4 planes? FOUR PLANES?? ARE YOU THAT FRIGGIN GULLIBLE? BOXCUTTERS??????????!!!
KingRamzes 4 years ago
how insightful
kahunakiller 4 years ago
not really... more like ignorant.
lebroniznumba1 4 years ago
Even liberal wackos such as you guys have the right to be stupid.
rifleman522 4 years ago
i am a conservative... and the official story stinks.
nobody1234567 4 years ago
Of course they say this on t.v!These people work 4 the government!Wake the fuck up people!
maattttt07 4 years ago
This guy needs to be shot. Lying government funded parasite..
trickmast 4 years ago
flew in like liquid what a bunch of crap
atlibent 4 years ago
I think atlibent's question was rhetorical. But the answer would be the government.
broebc 4 years ago
Why do you reply to my question that I'm asking someone else?
If you're going to reply, at least answer my question:" About how long ago?" I understand if you can use them now perfectly fine.
broebc 4 years ago
"it means that the people posting on these sites don't always know it all as you obviously trust they do"
i never said that they do know it all. please think about what you're saying next time you before you post a reply to comments. so just from your comment, you can basically conclude that there is no real fact or source out there because obviously "people posting on these sites don't always know it all". LOL
broebc 4 years ago
"people can post what ever the fuck they want on websites get a brain"
LOL, so I guess just by you saying that, it COMPLETELY rules out the chances of 911 being an inside job. WOW, please don't ever comment again.
broebc 4 years ago
i think you would know if you actually did research.
infowars(dot)com for example.
broebc 4 years ago
ask yourselves who owns the media in the US
this is all for a war for Israel in Iraq
atlibent 4 years ago
the video loosechange admits that the telephone conversations only lasted a few sentances so its not as if they ahd full conversations up there. BTW what would be the point of faking telephone conversations.
debunkin 4 years ago
to make it look like that there were actual hijackers on the plane.
broebc 4 years ago
Didnt they get that from the blackbox recordings?
debunkin 4 years ago
Yes, they did. But not after the FBI confiscated them and refused to release them to the public until a few months afterwards. I'm not saying that it's 100% conspiracy or 100% not a conspiracy, but the FBI COULD'VE (not a definite yes that they did)tampered with the recordings.
broebc 4 years ago
Every plane crash that will happen. YOu wont hear about it untill there done with the investigation.
debunkin 4 years ago
Did you know that bush didn't allow investigation of 911 until more than a year after it happened?
The recordings were made public a few months after 911, before the investigation was even started. But there was still enough time for the recordings to be fixed, if they were.
broebc 4 years ago
Thats a lie. They may of looked into it a bit more a year after but the investigation was started only a day later. Investigation meaning. Trying to find out more about what happend more deeply.
debunkin 4 years ago
Then why were there reports that bush and cheney are delaying the investigation of 911?
The complete, thorough investigation wasn't allowed to take place until more than a year later after 911.
broebc 4 years ago
Reports? As in a whitness report? Do you even know what your talking about?
What was there to investigate if the story ahd already been revealed?
debunkin 4 years ago
Please research before you reply to my comments.
And the "story" that you're referring to is the official story that the government told the people. Why do you think Congress is planning on a new investigation on 911? The official story doesn't add up, that's why.
broebc 4 years ago
Here is a link that proves you wrong: investigate911(dot)com(slash)whynoinvestigation(dot)htm
broebc 4 years ago
Id put some money on it that i have done more research than you. Thats a speculative comment that you think i have not done any research. What you CTers need to do is quit playing he said she said and go to the orginal sources instead of these 911 was inside job sites. How about you do some REAL research.
debunkin 4 years ago
HAHAHAHA, 1) when I said "Please research before you reply to my comments.", I didn't mean that you didn't do ANY research at all. 2) you're probably right that you've done more research than me, but that doesn't mean that you went to the right sources. I'm saying that the same way that anti-CTs like you accuse CTers going to "CT sites" for info and that they're not reliable. 3) i'm not a CT myself, even tho many say that I sound like one. I'm just looking for answers.
broebc 4 years ago
"What you CTers need to do is quit playing he said she said and go to the orginal sources instead of these 911 was inside job sites."
So any site that even gives the slightest hint that 911 possibly, could've, maybe have been an inside job is 100% fake?
How do people know what sites are reliable nowadays?
It seems that people accuse websites of being inaccurate or unreliable because the info in the sites don't go the way they want it to.
broebc 4 years ago
No no no no no. What im saying is dont go to a "9-11 is an inside job site" Because many of them are unreliable. HEll dont go to a debunking 911 site. Go to factual sources. Like one 9-11 site claimed that the commision report had an appendix talking about molten steel being found. I went to the exact copy of the commision report and it said nothing of the sort. If there is an actual fact taht prooves the 9-11 theory i would accept it.
debunkin 4 years ago
I'm not trying to start a fight but I just want to know the truth. If the sources that you said I get my info from is wrong then please, give me a link to some reliable sources that presents true facts. I'm not for either side of the argument between 911 being an inside job or not, I just ask a lot of questions, that's all.
broebc 4 years ago
What im saying is dont reserach for a research site. Research the shit that research sites say they looking for. Then you get into hard evidence.
debunkin 4 years ago
ok, thx!!!
broebc 4 years ago
he, lol, this looks like psyops.."The cell phones work absolutely alright. There's no need to worry. Be cool, your president has everything under controle (literally, or is it dick cheney?), the wtc came down as planned (oops) and everything is completey logically explainable. Gullible sheeple, oh, right. The internet sparks a bunch of paranoid nerds everytime a plane crashes...Righteo.
W4d5Y 4 years ago
this video is sad. the ppl behind 9/11(the us government) will burn in hell for what they did and are still doing today.
coldwinter313 4 years ago
fact, smoking pot causes people to be paranoid...so stop smoking dope and you won't have to fear your own gov't. If they want you dead, they would of done it by now.
rite87 4 years ago
its sad because it disproves your theory. Why dont you try and rebuttle the debunkers instead of calling names and changing the subject and saying its sad?
debunkin 4 years ago
Did you hear that everyone? Fox News and their experts say that we have absolutely nothing to worry about. The governemnt makes decisions in our best interests. Yea right.
Ask yourself... What would the Bush administration accomplished during his term if the 9/11 attacks had never happened? Would he still have the same agenda?
WakingMajority 4 years ago
the best in the interest for the iraqis, the afghani people....the americans. Well, sure, the govt obviously nas no trubble whatsoever concerning dealing with conspiracy theorists... Just lock em away, as they always do ^^
W4d5Y 4 years ago