Looks like the paid liars are hot to trot on this vid. Fuck off all you pathetic liars, back and to the left it is what it looks like, wt7 is non-debunkable. not much fire, crimping just before collapse, audio evidence of explosions, visible charges, eyewitness testimony, youre fighting a losing battle against the cold hard facts, give up. inside job, outside job, planes or no planes, fire or no fire, these buildings were bought down with explosives, anyone who suggests otherwise is a cog.
The anchors are not aware that the images are on videotape. No one in the control room tells them that. So they mistakenly assume that they are looking at live images of the scene (unaware that it the images are actually 5 to 6 minutes old). Check it out for yourself. Go to the Internet Archive and search under "Moving Images" for Fox5 Sept. 11, 2001 4:51 pm - 5:33 pm (September 11, 2001). Check the clock times and do the math.
The collapse occurred at about 5:20 pm EDT... and the anchors do not report on its collapse until around 5:25 to 5:26 pm EDT. The control room informs the anchors about the Building 7 collapse. The anchors report that news to the audience. While the anchors are speaking, the control room re-racks and shows videotape of the collapse that they have just recorded off a live feed.
Go to the Internet Archive and check "Moving images" for the following video... FOX5 Sept. 11, 2001 4:51 pm - 5:33 pm (September 11, 2001) and you will see the full air check of this broadcast. Note that the anchors do not report on the collapse until 5 to 6 minutes AFTER the collapse has already happened.
Fox-5 in Washington DC did NOT report the Building 7 collapse BEFORE it happened. The anchors were told about the collapse moments after it happened. They then tossed to videotape of the collapse which they mistakenly thought were live pictures.
Fox-5 in Washington DC did NOT report the Building 7 collapse before it happened. The anchors were told about the collapse moments after it happened. They then tossed to videotape of the collapse which they mistakenly thought were live pictures.
Did they even notice what happened in the middle of their report? They seemed unphased by it, either that or they are so shocked and afraid of the massive mistake they and their network just made...
There's nothing here that says the video segment they were watching was 'live'. The BBC version is pretty damning though. Maybe I missed the time stamp on this video, or other segment so you could tell it was reported 'before' the building collapsed?
no one told them what building it was and they were told WTC7 was down, i dont think they are a massive part of the cover up BUT whoever told them what to say should be tried..Its so sad how indepth this whole thing was.You cant blame Americans for being so naive then and so angry. its heartbreaking to think our government was capable, but they did it, they killed all those people and orchestrated such synthetic terror in order to start a massive global reconstruction. trillions were imbesseled
As the (pre-scripted) reasons given for the collapse of WTC 7 rely totally on the collapse (for the official reasons also) of the other two towers, then the collapse of all 3, - and the reasons to be given, were pre-scripted and planned in advance of the day. That the NWO is responsible/involved is borne out by the fact that the worldwide news media (Reuters) had the story before the news had happened.
SHAME on the Council for Foreign Relations for allowing Reuters to press release too early exposing the NWO for the lying murderous money-grabbing excrement that they are.
Bush adminatration I will never forget your intent til the day I die, you destroyed the Surplus, economy ,killed Thousands and ran from the Judicial system.Our constitutuinal rights are all but gone but the New World Order is going as planned! Burn in Hell as God's Judicial plan shall be going in effect when u have that last breathe !! Bump it up !!
The way I remember it the media was informed by authorities that WTC 7 was going to collapse, how authorities (engineers, architects, technicians, fireman?) reached that conclusion I have no idea or knowledge to speculate.
But if authorities were responsible for the collapse why would they announce it to the media? Sounds stupid.
The BBC reported it first ,before it happened , these people were watching a tape of what happened after the fact. As for the person that posted that 9/11 truth movement is promoting misinformation.. ..you're wrong about that one pal. You may go through life with blinders on , while architects and engineers for 9/11 truth are putting their reputations on the line and risking public ridicule to get the truth out to us , these people are the real soldiers. ....WAKE UP!
The BBC reported it first ,before it happened , these people were watching a tape of what happened after the fact. As for the person that posted that 9/11 truth movement is promoting misinformation.. uhhh ..you're wrong about that one pal. You may go through life with blinders on , while architects and engineers for 9/11 truth are putting their reputations on the line and risking public ridicule to get the truth out to us , these people are the real soldiers. ....WAKE UP!
RICO statutes may be brought to bear to seize the assets of these "news" organizations for their collusion in the crimes of 9-11 and subsequent cover-up. The conspiracy by media is an essential element to success of the crimes of 9-11.
It saddens me that the 9/11 truth movement still is promoting this misinformation. Can you not go verify the time from the Internet Telelevision Archive video that this aired 6 minutes later?
CNN, the BBC and FOX 5 all reported that WTC-7 collapsed before it actually did. WOW!!! Either they were all told the same "cover story" or they can ALL tell the future. What do you think makes more sense?
This can be explained away; that would be normal, because what it implies is fairly dastardly. And yes the voices are synced to the video; the whole thing is live. Listen carefully, watch carefully, they are responding in realtime and at the beginning she assumes that it's already happened; the background is continuous; and then it falls as they comment on it falling. Note that BBC said it had fallen at 4:54 pm, 27 minutes early. BBC in the UK announced it at the same time. And so on.
Hi all, for those who come to this video -- here is an article I've published it today that references it. Please reassemble the URL -- I have to break it up so that it will post in this space.
planetwaves . net / astrologynews / wtc7 . h t m l
if i'm not mistaken, that lady is still working on fox 5. i would know, i live right outside of DC. suck it you 9/11 "truth"er assholes. did you ever think that maybe things were hectic during that day? hmm? or are your communist/far-left tendencies blinding you?
@fearthehawksndcavs24 I will grant you that things can get hectic, yes, and it definitely was hectic that day around the newsrooms. However, it is rather impossible to report news that hasn't happened yet. Isn't it?
haha exactly, it was not only fox that reported bldg 7 before it fell also BBC. and it fell as if a professionak demolition team prepared it. exactly onto itself... ironic eh. very left wing. at least democrats dont have the balls to kill their own people to promote thier agendas.
Read up on Christopher Bollyns fine work on 9 11. See his book on line in pdf form. It is very well researched. Time to stop all the lies. Wake up everyone.
In this video there's likely a time delay. They probably rushed to get a video feed on and didn't have time to seek to exactly before it fell, etc. Or that live camera was really delayed, who knows.
However, in the case of the BBC report, it's just absurdly strange. Also, supposedly neither Fox News nor the BBC still have footage from that day.
It's just weird. Not even getting into the physics of 2 floor fires collapsing a building so it drops in near-freefall.
you can create some sort of conspiracy out of any news report... even things like Hurricane Katrina.. since they went about talking about it the same way...telling you what happened and then showing a video
u people need to use common sense.. your trying to make mountains out of ant hills
He's saying the collapse happened on tape and they were replaying it here. It doesn't say "live" in the corner of the screen. But it doesn't matter if it was live or not because of the obvious nature of the demolition, and also I've seen a BBC feed that actually says "live" in the corner and the footage was identical to this shot but on BBC. It was 100% certain an inside job. It fascinates me how many ignorant masses still eat out of their masters hand however.
Based on the times shown, your assessment is correct, as far as it goes. However, just because they reported the news at 5:26 does not mean it was received at that time. Elsewhere you will find that the BBC actually reported the collapse 23 minutes early. The reporter announcing the collapse was standing with her back to a window in which Building 7 was still standing, even as she reported it's collapse.
he was the guy that protected Reagon when the assassination attempt happened.... he was shot and the news stations reported him dead.....until they found out he was alive...this is actually pretty common amongst news stations..they will get reports and put out..like the Tower Is Collapsing... and they will say The Tower Has Collapsed..much like Brady Has been Shot........Brady is dead....common sense?
he got it right with hollywood!!! i am sure hollywood had a lot to do with the images we saw all over on TV!!!these attacks were no work of some 19 years old kids conducted by someone sitting in a cave on the other side of the earth, no way! this was a huge complicated action that only the US government with all its agencies could of carried out with such a precision and on such a scale. dont fall for the propaganda the media sold you!!!
Do you see how immediately they go to the assumption it fell due to structural damage? The news team knew this before any official investigation was done.
No they didnt assume. She was reading it and someone was writing it and that someone either knew or was being told by someone else. Find those someone's and you can pick up the mile-wide paper trail that leads to kissinger rockefella cheney rumsfeld & many others that knew in advance & planned this attack for years/decades. Problem is people get offended when you remind them they have been brainwashed, becuase they are smart! & real conspirarcies only happen on TV. NWO coming to a hand near you.
Oh I know they were reading...but whoever fed them that chit "somehow", before any analysis was performed, "knew" why the building fell. This is all the evidence we need...even though there is tons more.
The collapse of WTC7 and the inability of the gov. to provide even one picture of an actual plane hitting the Pentagon to me is irrefutable proof that the official report of the events of 9-11 is a complete lie and fraud!
I would even go so far as to say the controlling elite (Cheney, PNAC, Mossad,CIA) probably had a hand in it. One things for sure, 5 Arabs in a cave could not pull this one off and then cover it up!
. . . the NIST director has determined that certain evidence . . is voluntarily provided . . not directly related to the building failure . . and that disclosure of that information would inhibit the voluntary provision of that type of information.
In other words: they aren't telling you all of their information. Only what they feel like. We can't check their work because they're not providing us with all of their information.
@CloanLabs This may very well have 100 of thousands of hits..Youtube has been known to roll back the odometers on some of their cars if you know what I mean.
9/11 WAS DEFINITELY AN INSIDE JOB !! ae911truth(dot)org
YES she says that its going down right now but she already said the building has collapased. These 2 News anchors should be put on trial so they can explain how they had for knowledge
I beg to differ. These people are supposed to tell the truth but they choose to be propaganda agents. They are accessories to all the crimes they help cover up.
@chinasherry1961 the anchors were NOT watching a LIVE shot of NY. That was a video being played-back and they were narrating. don't get the news anchors involved in your youtube-based political rhetoric
Clearly WTC 7 was excluded from the 9/11 commission report because it wasn't an inside job. Obviously the building fell symmetrically at free fall speed because debris from the twin towers knocked off ALL the fire proofing which allowed the fire in wtc7 to cause a collapse. Ya, and pigs fly...
7 collpased over 18 seconds. The reason 7 was not included in the 911 report is the same reason MOST OF the buildings damaged and destroyed that day were not included.
Specifically, it was a report on THE TERRORIST'S ATTACK ON THE US!!!
It was NOT a "lets debunk every moron kookspiracy" report.
What about the BBC report that predicted the collapse 20 minutes in advance when no sky scraper in history had collapsed as a result of a fire? Edge you're a moron. If building collapses as a result of a terrorist attack, it should be included in the investigation. Edge, nevermind, the collapse of WTC 7 on september was simply a coincidence - had nothing to do with the attack. My mistake. Edgeman = Idiot
YOUR AN IDOIT FOR RESPONDING TO THE WRONG FUCKING COMMENT. I agree with you, but causing the opposition idiots is not helping our ultimate goal: to reopen the 911 investigation.
YOUR A DOUCHE FOR USING ALL CAPS. I agree with you but calling people who support your position idiots is not helping our ultimate goal: to reopen the 911 investigation.
Correction: My ultimate goal is to create an elaborate theme park in which people can view live dinosaurs. What could go wrong?
I remember you. You are the ignorant fellow who doesn't do his homework. You are a shill and I have nothing but contempt for you. If you aren't being paid by the government you ought to be. You are a fascist and I hope a spacial place in hell awaits you.
ITS rediculous,your right no one would know this would happen from fire!it had to be planned and given to media ,all part of the scare tactic used on US,US, US!all americans who dont beleive ,yes US AMERICANS!
Yea just goes to show the five mega corporations that control the us government & own every news company in the western world are directly responsible for the events on 9/11 and its cover-up. The us government system isn't democratic, thats why the richest therefore the most powerful parties have to steel elections illegally. Its a puppet democracy, private banks took control over the states in 1913 & have been getting more & more powerful & corrupt since.google vid zeitgeist if u want the truth
the one on BBC is even better, they cut the live images not to show the collapse
MrDuspaghi 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you care about any of souls lost on this day you will google: Project Northwoods
Like this get this to the top
xSwift2strikex 7 months ago
"its going down right now...." thats a live feed
XFreeXYourXMindX 8 months ago
Looks like the paid liars are hot to trot on this vid. Fuck off all you pathetic liars, back and to the left it is what it looks like, wt7 is non-debunkable. not much fire, crimping just before collapse, audio evidence of explosions, visible charges, eyewitness testimony, youre fighting a losing battle against the cold hard facts, give up. inside job, outside job, planes or no planes, fire or no fire, these buildings were bought down with explosives, anyone who suggests otherwise is a cog.
quarkmuffin37 9 months ago
The firefighters said WTC 7 was unstable and likely to collapse. That fact pretty much destroys the demolition theory.
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree thats good enough for me......lmfao
cdimmm 6 months ago
The anchors are not aware that the images are on videotape. No one in the control room tells them that. So they mistakenly assume that they are looking at live images of the scene (unaware that it the images are actually 5 to 6 minutes old). Check it out for yourself. Go to the Internet Archive and search under "Moving Images" for Fox5 Sept. 11, 2001 4:51 pm - 5:33 pm (September 11, 2001). Check the clock times and do the math.
bkj333 9 months ago 2
The collapse occurred at about 5:20 pm EDT... and the anchors do not report on its collapse until around 5:25 to 5:26 pm EDT. The control room informs the anchors about the Building 7 collapse. The anchors report that news to the audience. While the anchors are speaking, the control room re-racks and shows videotape of the collapse that they have just recorded off a live feed.
bkj333 9 months ago
Go to the Internet Archive and check "Moving images" for the following video... FOX5 Sept. 11, 2001 4:51 pm - 5:33 pm (September 11, 2001) and you will see the full air check of this broadcast. Note that the anchors do not report on the collapse until 5 to 6 minutes AFTER the collapse has already happened.
bkj333 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fox-5 in Washington DC did NOT report the Building 7 collapse BEFORE it happened. The anchors were told about the collapse moments after it happened. They then tossed to videotape of the collapse which they mistakenly thought were live pictures.
bkj333 9 months ago
Fox-5 in Washington DC did NOT report the Building 7 collapse before it happened. The anchors were told about the collapse moments after it happened. They then tossed to videotape of the collapse which they mistakenly thought were live pictures.
bkj333 9 months ago
Did they even notice what happened in the middle of their report? They seemed unphased by it, either that or they are so shocked and afraid of the massive mistake they and their network just made...
adim88 9 months ago
There's nothing here that says the video segment they were watching was 'live'. The BBC version is pretty damning though. Maybe I missed the time stamp on this video, or other segment so you could tell it was reported 'before' the building collapsed?
milackk7 9 months ago
Haha fox news. screwing around with civilians everday
And then screwing around with the government when given a cover story
what a bunch of idiots :)
ucerealb 10 months ago
no one told them what building it was and they were told WTC7 was down, i dont think they are a massive part of the cover up BUT whoever told them what to say should be tried..Its so sad how indepth this whole thing was.You cant blame Americans for being so naive then and so angry. its heartbreaking to think our government was capable, but they did it, they killed all those people and orchestrated such synthetic terror in order to start a massive global reconstruction. trillions were imbesseled
volcom2572 11 months ago
Lol, it wasn't live broadcast. That why they were so calm when it came down! They put too long clip and created illusion of foreknowledge.
hypercub 11 months ago
As the (pre-scripted) reasons given for the collapse of WTC 7 rely totally on the collapse (for the official reasons also) of the other two towers, then the collapse of all 3, - and the reasons to be given, were pre-scripted and planned in advance of the day. That the NWO is responsible/involved is borne out by the fact that the worldwide news media (Reuters) had the story before the news had happened.
snakeskin2u2 11 months ago
SHAME on the Council for Foreign Relations for allowing Reuters to press release too early exposing the NWO for the lying murderous money-grabbing excrement that they are.
snakeskin2u2 11 months ago
Wrong story ? -NO Someone heard or misunderstood a message ? -NO
False scripted story ? - NO
Somebody go the wrong end of the stick ? -NO
Somebody press released too early ? - YES !
snakeskin2u2 11 months ago
It's just a simple mistake that anyone could make - Reuters (CFR) press release was too early.
SHAME on them exposing the NWO pre-scripted and planned 9/11( long before 9/11) was carried out by them, and not "terrorists".
Now, wait a minute, - Just who ARE the terrorists ??????
snakeskin2u2 11 months ago
Lol wow, seriously? this chic just had waaaayyyyyyyy too much fuck'n information all i can say is shaaaady...
DECEPTdaKon 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xenomorph911WTC 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xenomorph911WTC 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xenomorph911WTC 1 year ago
Bush adminatration I will never forget your intent til the day I die, you destroyed the Surplus, economy ,killed Thousands and ran from the Judicial system.Our constitutuinal rights are all but gone but the New World Order is going as planned! Burn in Hell as God's Judicial plan shall be going in effect when u have that last breathe !! Bump it up !!
Manning713 1 year ago
The way I remember it the media was informed by authorities that WTC 7 was going to collapse, how authorities (engineers, architects, technicians, fireman?) reached that conclusion I have no idea or knowledge to speculate.
But if authorities were responsible for the collapse why would they announce it to the media? Sounds stupid.
Maxheadroom1980 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The BBC reported it first ,before it happened , these people were watching a tape of what happened after the fact. As for the person that posted that 9/11 truth movement is promoting misinformation.. ..you're wrong about that one pal. You may go through life with blinders on , while architects and engineers for 9/11 truth are putting their reputations on the line and risking public ridicule to get the truth out to us , these people are the real soldiers. ....WAKE UP!
thespokenfont 1 year ago
The BBC reported it first ,before it happened , these people were watching a tape of what happened after the fact. As for the person that posted that 9/11 truth movement is promoting misinformation.. uhhh ..you're wrong about that one pal. You may go through life with blinders on , while architects and engineers for 9/11 truth are putting their reputations on the line and risking public ridicule to get the truth out to us , these people are the real soldiers. ....WAKE UP!
thespokenfont 1 year ago
RICO statutes may be brought to bear to seize the assets of these "news" organizations for their collusion in the crimes of 9-11 and subsequent cover-up. The conspiracy by media is an essential element to success of the crimes of 9-11.
ReDiscover911 (dot) com
whole2th 1 year ago
Especially you Mr. Franchii, you should know better.
Xenomorph911WTC 1 year ago
It saddens me that the 9/11 truth movement still is promoting this misinformation. Can you not go verify the time from the Internet Telelevision Archive video that this aired 6 minutes later?
Xenomorph911WTC 1 year ago
This is ridiculous! How could they sit there and calmly say "there it goes". Complete inside job.
WTC7WasPulled 1 year ago
CNN, the BBC and FOX 5 all reported that WTC-7 collapsed before it actually did. WOW!!! Either they were all told the same "cover story" or they can ALL tell the future. What do you think makes more sense?
infoseeker264 1 year ago 2
This can be explained away; that would be normal, because what it implies is fairly dastardly. And yes the voices are synced to the video; the whole thing is live. Listen carefully, watch carefully, they are responding in realtime and at the beginning she assumes that it's already happened; the background is continuous; and then it falls as they comment on it falling. Note that BBC said it had fallen at 4:54 pm, 27 minutes early. BBC in the UK announced it at the same time. And so on.
bookofblue 1 year ago 2
Hi all, for those who come to this video -- here is an article I've published it today that references it. Please reassemble the URL -- I have to break it up so that it will post in this space.
planetwaves . net / astrologynews / wtc7 . h t m l
bookofblue 1 year ago
It is possible that the tape was on a time delay. At no time during the video do they say or imply that the video is a "live" or instantaneous feed
spaceusagi 1 year ago
they said the buildings collapsed ahead of time on BBC too
slayyer000 1 year ago
dont these damn videos ever have time codes?
If there was a big news logo in the bottom with '9:05AM' etc etc, it would really help the case.
TheIslammiracle 1 year ago
hey that's my local news station. 3:08 i lived in that county at the time
Dman761 1 year ago
It is time to strike back for freedom.
vortigern5 1 year ago
if i'm not mistaken, that lady is still working on fox 5. i would know, i live right outside of DC. suck it you 9/11 "truth"er assholes. did you ever think that maybe things were hectic during that day? hmm? or are your communist/far-left tendencies blinding you?
fearthehawksndcavs24 1 year ago
@fearthehawksndcavs24 I will grant you that things can get hectic, yes, and it definitely was hectic that day around the newsrooms. However, it is rather impossible to report news that hasn't happened yet. Isn't it?
OriginalScratch 1 year ago
@OriginalScratch what i'm saying is that they might have recieved information of a collapse, and played it by ear.
fearthehawksndcavs24 1 year ago
@fearthehawksndcavs24
well I guess you never saw the BBC version then as well?
asshole
dragnet53 1 year ago
@fearthehawksndcavs24
haha exactly, it was not only fox that reported bldg 7 before it fell also BBC. and it fell as if a professionak demolition team prepared it. exactly onto itself... ironic eh. very left wing. at least democrats dont have the balls to kill their own people to promote thier agendas.
and no im not liberal/dem.
freechechnya2 1 year ago
Read up on Christopher Bollyns fine work on 9 11. See his book on line in pdf form. It is very well researched. Time to stop all the lies. Wake up everyone.
eckyspondoolie 1 year ago
It's not important to argue whether the footage was live or not.
What's important is the assertion that they know conclusively the cause of the collapse. This is something they cannot know. Listen again.
This information initiated the shaping of public opinion on all collapses, along with other clips from that day, asserting the same conclusions.
I repeat, they could not know the cause of collapse.
PlumPictures 1 year ago
Comment removed
PlumPictures 1 year ago
9/11 Truthers do the world a favor and kill yourselves you brainless fucks.
temdatli 1 year ago
@temdatli ... because ?
You are American and dont want to know ?
....tell this guy he's brainless ...Richard Gage, AIA ( one of the top Architects in USA)
google it unless it you whos stupid...
europeandrifter 1 year ago
jesus comon if you see LIVE on your'e tv it doesn't mean there is no time delay....
italyalex 2 years ago
In this video there's likely a time delay. They probably rushed to get a video feed on and didn't have time to seek to exactly before it fell, etc. Or that live camera was really delayed, who knows.
However, in the case of the BBC report, it's just absurdly strange. Also, supposedly neither Fox News nor the BBC still have footage from that day.
It's just weird. Not even getting into the physics of 2 floor fires collapsing a building so it drops in near-freefall.
jvdthwip 2 years ago
This footage is not conclusive because they MIGHT have just been replaying the recorded footage of the collapse a few minutes prior.
However the BBC report is conclusive because they talk to a reporter LIVE with WTC7 behind her still standing.
9/11 was an inside job! - been proven over and over, just this particular clip is not one of the proofs.
gamer11515 2 years ago
you people are really stupid
do u think it was live???
no they were showing it AFTER it happened...
geez you people can be so stupid sometimes
illiniman06 2 years ago
???????
are u stupid????
the building is still standing there, u fukin moron !!!
thedayitriedtodie 2 years ago
um no
watch the video
they showed you old footage
as you can tell
because its not live :P
try watching it first
then comment
illiniman06 2 years ago
??
how is it not Live?????
well the building does go down live, as u see....
what's ur point, am i missing something? maybe u didn't watch it?
thedayitriedtodie 2 years ago
because when they do things live
it typically says live
does it say live
and also challenge u to find me any news video..of anytime period that doesnt say live when the event is actually happening at that moment
illiniman06 2 years ago
listen man, i've argued with u in other videos, u are just an idiot.
it doesn't say live, but they are talking as if.
no?
thedayitriedtodie 2 years ago
noo
they said
WEve just got word
and then it shows an older clip
MUCH like every other news report
and then shows the actual event
with this logic
you can create some sort of conspiracy out of any news report... even things like Hurricane Katrina.. since they went about talking about it the same way...telling you what happened and then showing a video
u people need to use common sense.. your trying to make mountains out of ant hills
illiniman06 2 years ago
He's saying the collapse happened on tape and they were replaying it here. It doesn't say "live" in the corner of the screen. But it doesn't matter if it was live or not because of the obvious nature of the demolition, and also I've seen a BBC feed that actually says "live" in the corner and the footage was identical to this shot but on BBC. It was 100% certain an inside job. It fascinates me how many ignorant masses still eat out of their masters hand however.
tropophyte 1 year ago 2
damn OWNED
blviking56 2 years ago
Calm down, the 'window' was a monitor and not live.
About this clip, you really think the people who blew up 7 would ring around news outlets to report it?? WTF for man? Just in case no one noticed?
Get a grip man.
TYTMaverick 2 years ago
Based on the times shown, your assessment is correct, as far as it goes. However, just because they reported the news at 5:26 does not mean it was received at that time. Elsewhere you will find that the BBC actually reported the collapse 23 minutes early. The reporter announcing the collapse was standing with her back to a window in which Building 7 was still standing, even as she reported it's collapse.
YHWHreigns 3 years ago
totally unbelievable indeed, only hollywood? no, only the people involved? yes. thank you fox.
jay69bell8 3 years ago
ya....they fucked up.
kingklick77 3 years ago
do you seriously think it was live
geezz you people are stupid
JUST like with everything else in news
THEY SHOW U THE EVEN AFTER IT HAPPENED...the video wasnt live
wow...
illiniman06 2 years ago
and why they should show us, with the news that wtc 7 is collapse, a scene, where wtc 7 is not collapse?
RealLastManStanding 2 years ago
AND WHY!!!!
should they tell you Jim Brady is dead??
illiniman06 2 years ago
i dont care what happened, opinions dont change
kingklick77 2 years ago
lol your choice
i guess u can believe Jim Brady died too haha
illiniman06 2 years ago
never heard ofhim
kingklick77 2 years ago
he was the guy that protected Reagon when the assassination attempt happened.... he was shot and the news stations reported him dead.....until they found out he was alive...this is actually pretty common amongst news stations..they will get reports and put out..like the Tower Is Collapsing... and they will say The Tower Has Collapsed..much like Brady Has been Shot........Brady is dead....common sense?
illiniman06 2 years ago 2
Incidentally it was live. BBC reported the exact same feed with the word "live" in the corner of the screen, and same shot of the collapse, here.
youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc
tropophyte 1 year ago 2
ONLY HOLLYWOOD ROFL
FATCACAK 3 years ago
This is clearly not a live broadcast.
rustygaver 3 years ago
check out the BBC broadcast.. I agree with you on this one.. but the BBC broadcast is clearly live..
caesar3693 2 years ago
he got it right with hollywood!!! i am sure hollywood had a lot to do with the images we saw all over on TV!!!these attacks were no work of some 19 years old kids conducted by someone sitting in a cave on the other side of the earth, no way! this was a huge complicated action that only the US government with all its agencies could of carried out with such a precision and on such a scale. dont fall for the propaganda the media sold you!!!
wdcsucks1 3 years ago
Do you see how immediately they go to the assumption it fell due to structural damage? The news team knew this before any official investigation was done.
What other evidence needs to be posted?
JSSTyger 3 years ago
No they didnt assume. She was reading it and someone was writing it and that someone either knew or was being told by someone else. Find those someone's and you can pick up the mile-wide paper trail that leads to kissinger rockefella cheney rumsfeld & many others that knew in advance & planned this attack for years/decades. Problem is people get offended when you remind them they have been brainwashed, becuase they are smart! & real conspirarcies only happen on TV. NWO coming to a hand near you.
UTubeFreeMind 3 years ago
Oh I know they were reading...but whoever fed them that chit "somehow", before any analysis was performed, "knew" why the building fell. This is all the evidence we need...even though there is tons more.
JSSTyger 3 years ago
The media is complicit in the deception of the American people. Legally, they can be held responsible as accomplices after the fact.
They are making fools out of us.
I am calling for a boycott of ALL mainstream media until they admit what really happened on 9/11...
Let's quit supporting them financially.
sweetbwaoy 3 years ago
the banks too.. take your money out before they confiscate it!
FATCACAK 3 years ago
The collapse of WTC7 and the inability of the gov. to provide even one picture of an actual plane hitting the Pentagon to me is irrefutable proof that the official report of the events of 9-11 is a complete lie and fraud!
I would even go so far as to say the controlling elite (Cheney, PNAC, Mossad,CIA) probably had a hand in it. One things for sure, 5 Arabs in a cave could not pull this one off and then cover it up!
RayAir1 3 years ago 2
They knew it was going to go down because it was damaged.
MIAcrimsonandgold 3 years ago
I'm sorry...I thought they said the building FELL not that it was going to fall. News stations usually try to be as accurate as possible.
JSSTyger 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NIST's WTC 7 report disclaimer No. 3:
. . . the NIST director has determined that certain evidence . . is voluntarily provided . . not directly related to the building failure . . and that disclosure of that information would inhibit the voluntary provision of that type of information.
In other words: they aren't telling you all of their information. Only what they feel like. We can't check their work because they're not providing us with all of their information.
Criminal investigation.
bobbygnosis 3 years ago
Well, at the very least you're looking at a female news anchor firing herself on live tv.
How does this video NOT have 5million hits?! Is the Avril Levigne vid MORE important?
"We are seeing video that only Hollywood could have produced at another time"?!?!
"The folks who are running things certainly DO have a grasp of it"?!
No shit. And I don't enjoy the feeling of that "grasp" around my throat!
Arrest the President.
CloanLabs 3 years ago 14
@CloanLabs This may very well have 100 of thousands of hits..Youtube has been known to roll back the odometers on some of their cars if you know what I mean.
9/11 WAS DEFINITELY AN INSIDE JOB !! ae911truth(dot)org
MrRiceowlex 1 year ago
@CloanLabs yes "the folks who are running things" were busy making sure they had taken the anthrax antidote pills at about that time...
Strike back for freedom.
vortigern5 1 year ago
YES she says that its going down right now but she already said the building has collapased. These 2 News anchors should be put on trial so they can explain how they had for knowledge
chinasherry1961 3 years ago 14
the west is gonna turn in to shit!!! lets focus on that, its gonna be fucked up in the U.S.
There is an actual chance that the US can become Argentina! buy gold now you still can. :)
jeffsst 3 years ago
You can't blame the anchors. They were reading from a prompter on their desk.
JSSTyger 3 years ago
I beg to differ. These people are supposed to tell the truth but they choose to be propaganda agents. They are accessories to all the crimes they help cover up.
NoJusticeInThisWorld 3 years ago
@chinasherry1961 the anchors were NOT watching a LIVE shot of NY. That was a video being played-back and they were narrating. don't get the news anchors involved in your youtube-based political rhetoric
yougoboydc 1 year ago
@chinasherry1961 she said she got WORD that it went down.
FNDabest 7 months ago
Actualy it was the Big Bad Wolf Hideing behind the Bush that blew down Bld 7
cycimian 3 years ago
wao,
noiseon 3 years ago
Clearly WTC 7 was excluded from the 9/11 commission report because it wasn't an inside job. Obviously the building fell symmetrically at free fall speed because debris from the twin towers knocked off ALL the fire proofing which allowed the fire in wtc7 to cause a collapse. Ya, and pigs fly...
rockyrhoadz 3 years ago 3
Cleary people who believe rock is are morons.
7 collpased over 18 seconds. The reason 7 was not included in the 911 report is the same reason MOST OF the buildings damaged and destroyed that day were not included.
Specifically, it was a report on THE TERRORIST'S ATTACK ON THE US!!!
It was NOT a "lets debunk every moron kookspiracy" report.
Twoofers are morons.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
What 18 seconds? What the hell are you smoking. If you say that fell down in more than 10 seconds your lying.
DMWestWoodElite 3 years ago 3
What about the BBC report that predicted the collapse 20 minutes in advance when no sky scraper in history had collapsed as a result of a fire? Edge you're a moron. If building collapses as a result of a terrorist attack, it should be included in the investigation. Edge, nevermind, the collapse of WTC 7 on september was simply a coincidence - had nothing to do with the attack. My mistake. Edgeman = Idiot
andrewh23 3 years ago 3
YOUR AN IDOIT FOR RESPONDING TO THE WRONG FUCKING COMMENT. I agree with you, but causing the opposition idiots is not helping our ultimate goal: to reopen the 911 investigation.
DMWestWoodElite 3 years ago
it did not fall down in 18 seconds.
DMWestWoodElite 3 years ago
YOUR A DOUCHE FOR USING ALL CAPS. I agree with you but calling people who support your position idiots is not helping our ultimate goal: to reopen the 911 investigation.
Correction: My ultimate goal is to create an elaborate theme park in which people can view live dinosaurs. What could go wrong?
andrewh23 3 years ago
I remember you. You are the ignorant fellow who doesn't do his homework. You are a shill and I have nothing but contempt for you. If you aren't being paid by the government you ought to be. You are a fascist and I hope a spacial place in hell awaits you.
bobbygnosis 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hey conspiracy fuckers!!! I uploaded a new vid "ignorance is bliss" cum check it...422 nah this isnt spam >:]
DogFoot23 3 years ago
ITS rediculous,your right no one would know this would happen from fire!it had to be planned and given to media ,all part of the scare tactic used on US,US, US!all americans who dont beleive ,yes US AMERICANS!
tone4624 3 years ago
BBC reported early too
halberkstresser 4 years ago 4
Yea just goes to show the five mega corporations that control the us government & own every news company in the western world are directly responsible for the events on 9/11 and its cover-up. The us government system isn't democratic, thats why the richest therefore the most powerful parties have to steel elections illegally. Its a puppet democracy, private banks took control over the states in 1913 & have been getting more & more powerful & corrupt since.google vid zeitgeist if u want the truth
Mazymabel 3 years ago 2
i know i know.....the choir here.
what is tough is the right decisions and actions to counter it......
halberkstresser 3 years ago
It seems to me we have to
1. educate ourselves & others Google & Watch "Freedom to Fascism"
2. Support Ron Paul Ronpaulmarch . com Revolutionmarch . com
3. Invest $ in Hard assets like Gold/Silver
4. Protest the corruption: watch?v=19dipWEhkUY
jasondeckerr 3 years ago
LOL!
Garbonzo07 4 years ago
LOL WTC7 is still standing.
OzInfoWarrior 4 years ago 4