If this is how soldiers are treated for serving their government then I'm never going to war for my country. I first noticed Vietnam, then the gulf war, now even this one. Fuck the American government. I wonder if Canada is facing the same issue.
So what, what do you expect, it's a free market so get fucked!!! You all voted for it, suck it up and fucking deal with it, or do something about it...
I enjoyed your video, If you need help getting your video exposed i use a service at Tubeviews . Net They offer views, ratings, and comments. They helped my video get ranked on the first page
LLLP3: At the time he made Xanadu, he had very little experience as a director. That being said, this really isn't even about Robert Greenwald. This is about the treasonous scandals he documents and exposes to the masses. But you obviously can't defend THAT so you decided to attack the messenger. How typical.
And Cheney still has 12.7m in stock options in Haliburton. He also has a US$12.5m mansion waiting for him in Dubai (where Haliburton are now based, to avoid US corporation taxes) and he can rely on Blackwater to provide him with security for the rest of his worthless life.
Why don't you go donate some money to the Catholic Church. I hear they are pass around a collection plate to pay back the victims their preists molested over the years. Go help your Christian people. Hurrry, run!!!
You just made my point about homosexuals. Lust controls their 'lifestyle'--overpowered and deceived by the evil one.
But there's salvation, jillianca, God died for your sins, ask Him for forgiveness and be truly sorry for all your sins, surrender your life to Him--He is the only way, the truth and the life, who could free you from the deception of the evil one.
Stop preaching to me! Lust controls many "people", not all. Take a look into your own back yard. Why don't you spend your time helping pass a law to make divorcing illegal. Isn't it a sin to divorce?
If marriage is such a perfect thing. Then you should be out promoting laws against divorce. Are you out doing that? NO....of course not. Typical hypocrite.
Where did I even hinted that marriage or everything is perfect, jiliannca? The causes of divorces varies from, Lust, (Adultery); Greed, (money problems); cruelty and Oppression, (domestic Violence) etc. Which proves my point, that Evil thrives. And when you let the evil one (Devil) take control of your life, instead of God, you will surely get lost in the wilderness of life or the valley of misery and death.
So what your saying is that straight people are the same sinners as gay people. So why not let gay people marry if they love each other? How does it hurt YOU? It doesn't! Mind your own business. Go adopt some of these parentless children your breeders have created.
We are all sinners, not one is free from sin, jiliannca.
Our only difference is how we acknowledge our sins to God and Surrender our lives to Him, so he could give us wisdom, strength and discernment, take over and lead us to the right path and veer us away from evil to avoid committing additional sins.
As I said before. You need to be looking into your own backyard before you start worrying about what's in mine. YOU leave the life of sin and stop promoting HATE. Stop prmoting parentless children. Stop breeding HATE. Stop craming your lifestyle upon others.
Your reading comprehension is as bad as your thinking (or the lack of it), jilianca. You first spewed diatibes on Christians & personally attacked me. I aptly defended my values & core beliefs, never once 'imposing' it on you. Deception is the devil's weapon. He took advantage of your weakness and fooled you into believing you're a woman, to marry a man and adopt a child and make you feel that you're doing the world a favor by "saving the orphans children"
It's ironic you're giving me advice on leaving a life of sin, yet YOU ARE living a sinful lifestyle, jiliannca. Ironic that you're telling me to stop promoting hatred, yet you've spewed hateful rhetorics in our exchanges.
Stay out of my business! You live your live and I will live mine. Stop craming your radical religion down my throat. You should spend more time adopting children that were bread by your breeders and have no homes because of the right to marry, breed and divorce like it's such a wonderful thing.
Religion causes war! You are a prime example of it. You don't walk on water. You need to look into your own backyard and clean it up before you look in to mine.
You're dead wrong, jilliannca--EVIL CAUSES WAR. Evil that brought unprecedented cruelty, greed, turmoil, oppression, destruction, LUST (the main component of homosexuality, not love), megalomania and narcissism. And evil should be stopped dead on it tracks at all cost, because..
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" (quote by Edmund Burke)
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! This is just too funny! You honestly think that 'evil' causes war? Please! Reserch history. The middle ages was prtically about God, and claming others in the name of God. Advancing to the new world and killing the natives has God's name written all over it too. Oh! The Salem Witch Trials! She's a wtich! Unpure! Burn her! For it is Gods will to rid that of evil! Yea... Evil... Ha ha ha!
Using the name of God in vain, is in itself evil, Ruinka. Any bonehead can figure that out. Those who uses God as an excuse to do evil things, like killing innocent civilians, 'infidels' or 'kafirs', who don't agree with their beliefs (sounds familiar?) and subjugation by the sword is their main goal (the start of the medieval religious wars that brought the Crusades)
Looks like Ruinka's brain got ruined by liberal indoctrination.
Oh the iorny in this. Who uses Gods name in vain more then your average athiest? Those who uses God as an excuse to do evil things, are the exacte people you associate yourself with. And the Crusaders... AHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! Please! The Crusaders are in the same religous catagoy you are in. They worship the same God you are today.
It would seem that not only does tacticomp cannot spell names correctly, but a narrow minded human that owned no one but him/her self.
The problem with the loony left like Ruinka, is that they don't recognize evil when they see it, even when it's happening right before their very eyes. In their sick perverted twisted mind, afflicted with DDH4B syndrome (Demented, Deranged Hatred for Bush), they would declare Bush as evil, while they embrace and applaud the obvious, proven evils of the world, like Ahmadinejad, Saddam, Hassad, Osama, Castro, Chavez et al.
The problem with this sorry excuse for a carbon unit who named him/her self tacticomp is that the very religion s/he is defeinding is the same group that has evil. Even God has an evil side. The bible says it it self. Not so perfict anymore now is it?
And where the hell did this DDHFB come from? Not once did I mention Bush and already I am labled a Bush hater. As 'suprising' as this may seem, I don't hate Bush. But I don't like him either. So, once again, where is your excuse?
'carbon unit'? this is an obvious sign that you're a Leftist Liberal and Gore Groupie, who swear by his lies, that one of your judges even court ordered it to be exposed. But I digress.
Since you're an "expert" on the bible, show me the passage where you claim "God has an evil side".
Alright, I'll tell you right now, since you obviously do not know me as well as you think you do, there is a fine line between democrates and liberal. So before you call me a liberal, think of who you are insulting instead, cause it is sure as hell not me.
If you keep repeating what the Liberal left of this country is saying, and you have a striking resemblance on positions and issues, then your subconscious is exposing you for what you are--a closet liberal.
Yea... You still don't get it. For one, I still want to know where the political side came from. Not once did I mention anything political and already I am being labeled a liberal. How crude of you.
And tell me, what have I said that has anything to do with liberal, hmmm? I really want to know where this came from.
"You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the LORD your God, am a JEALOUS God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, and on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me"
Deuteronomy 5:9
Is envy not one of the seven sins you were preaching about?
And what happen to the gay city Sodom? The bible said that God demolished it because it was filled with homosexuals. The giver of life that takes life. I though he was suppost to be viewed as a God of Peace. So why kill so many? And so soon before they live out their lives? I mean, shouldn't he let them live and then condem them to the fiery pits of hell? Hmmm?
Oh and by the way, LUST is the main component of every homo sapiens on this planet. Your heterosexual, simple minded, christian mind refuse to think otherwise.
Looks like Ruinka is an expert on 'LUST' and can psycho-analyze every 'homosapiens' on this planet. So a gay pedophile who lust and preys on children, is not part of that 'simple minded', simplistic, gobbledygook, psychobabble of a generalization. I think we smart people can figure out that 'lust' is one of the 7 deadly sins that personifies evil.
Oh wow! Arn't you ever so sure of yourself. So what about a heterosexual pedophile? Don't they count too? And why are you singeling out homosexuals? Don't you know that heterosexuals out number homos? And please! Heteros are sining every single day and night. All seven deadly sins. Their lust is no different from homos. The only differences is gender. What's your excuse now?
Why do you people keep breeding homosexuals if you don't like them? Homosexuals can't breed children. LMAO Talk to your people about breeding homosexuals.....won't you?
I didn't say I don't like them--'I hate the sin but not the sinner'. Because there is hope and forgiveness for all our sins, for we are all sinners, jillianca
Why do your hetrosexual people keep breeding 14 year old murders like the one yesterday in Ohio? Talk to your people who are breeding this stuff!!! Run Now!!
They are born from heterosexuals, true. But heterosexual are not breeding them to be homosexuals. Homosexuals develoupe their own sexuality at some point in time. Their own develoupment and something they accept. This is something you cannot place on heteros.
At least I am decent enough not to diliberatly mispell your name, for I have given you that much respect as a christian. Even though at this point you do not derserve it.
I find it creapy that people would follow a book that would promote someone to kill and then act as if it's no big deal and then have the nerve to call my life a sin. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
"LUST (the main component of homosexuality, not love)"
I made an analogy that you believe that those who love their partner with the same chromosone structure only lust for each other and feels nothing for their partner but the need to rut. This is where, once again, your heterosexual christian mind refuse to believe that there is such a thing called love in the homosexual community. Hit a nerve? Not really. Not from you. Never from you. You silly thing.
Oh I see how this works. You can make assumptions but when I do it, I have problems debating. Typical narrow mind still going strong at work I see. Hey "Mr. I Walk On Water", could you answer a few questions from the bible for me? I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?
Then why are you proclaiming that there is no love among the gay community and only lust? That is what you said. Lust is what made homosexuality, not love. A sinful abomination? What is NOT considered an abomination?
Have you ever thought that gay people loving each other is a way of god to allow 2 people 2 love each other and controlling the population at the same time? You breeders need to stop breeding, having abortions or leaving children in orphanages. I'm sure god would prefer gay marriage over overpopulating!
You can love anyone you like--you can love and have sex with a dog for all I care, jiliannca--but don't shove your lifestyle down our throats and change the world's scared societal institutions in the process. God already declared that the homosexuality is an abomination and would not condone this chosen lifestyle. Be careful who you accuse of abortions, I abhor it. Under population is now the biggest problem in Europe that Muslims have slowly taking over.
YOUR god may say that about homosexuals, but mine doesn't. He CREATED them. I have a choice to choose who my god is in this country. Don't cram YOUR lifestyle down my throat when you are the ones breeding homosexuals. Under poplulation? What about the 100,000's of children dying today in Africa and other nations? Did your god want this? Typical radical Christians are what are ruining this earth!
There is only one true God--and he died on the cross for your sins. He is the way, the truth, and the life---The only way to salvation is trough Him by being sorry of your sinful ways and surrender your life to Him.
Glad you mentioned the dying children in Africa, jiliannca--because it clearly proves my point that evil is the cause of man's miseries.--the evil corrupt men that run the governments of that nation is the main cause of their situation. We have almost the same population, vis a vis, their many nation states, and yet we don't have the malaise that these evil greedy, corrupt government officials had caused those small nations.
What about the children living in foster homes in this country? How many have you adopted since you feel their is an underpopulation? I can't belive your promoting procreation when children are already living in HELL! Your a sick person. Go pray for yourself.
I have my own Children, It is only logical to say that those who don't have the biological ability to have children should adopt.--which many Christians do. And our ministry supports many institutions including orphanages.
Just continue to prove your ignorance. Homosexual people CAN have children but many do not. Some do. I can assure you they won't raise their children to be a biggot like yourself. It will be funny when you find that your very own children question their own sexuality and will perhaps determine they are homosexual. LMAO. It COULD happen to one or more of your children you know? WAKE UP!
Who I marry doesn't affect you. You have no business deciding for me who I should marry. Just as I have no business helping you decice. People marry everyday that cannot procreate. I suppose you think they shouldn't marry also?
How could this president WANT to allow Mexican Trucks to travel all over this country? What happend to his "National Security" promise? This is crazy.
This is just one of the many frustrations we true conservatives have on the President--he had abandoned some of the our core beliefs and values that many conservative voters didn't show up last election and made the Demoncrats gained some seats in the senate. And the Demoncrats also took advantage of this quagmire and fielded so many 'conservative' candidates (and pushed conservative values to sound like one) to fool the people, and it worked--they gain Congress back.
another point is that IF president bush was really trying to stop terrorists, why doesnt he actually use some of the money to help the refugees because that is a huge resource for al qaeda. they leave home, dont get help from us because they are supposedly not our problem and who offers to feed them and help them in return for their loyalty?
You really didn't learn the lessons of history, Ear(in)ffection. Guess what? If we cut and run and surrender now in the global battlefront on terrorism, as what the Liberal Demoncrats are bent on doing. Just like Vietnam, genocide will follow and throngs of refugees will flee (remember the boat people?) Guess where will they end up? in your neighborhood. And you wouldn't know who amongst them will cut your throat.
So if you're main concern are refugees, then let's make sure the boat people syndrome won't happen again and give Iraq's thriving democracy and chance to run its course, like the 'Marshall Plan' in Europe and Japan after WW2, it took them years to stand on their own and made progress--look at them now.
April 16th 2003.Read CNN archived document about halliburton contract in Iraq from as back as april 2003. money.c nn. com/2003/04/16/news/economy/war_oil_primer/index. h tm
No wonder you're so Dizzy(Masekela)--Because you're a moron.
Demoncrats Presidents were in office during most of the US involvements in major wars, from WW1, WW2, Korean war, VIETNAM war, and KOSOVO. I bet your African village unanimously voted you as their village idiot.
DON'T READ You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved , sorry
Now that the Dems have the House and Senate I have yet to hear about Haliburton or these other companies being brought before them in any investigation. I guess the Dems are being bought off as well.
Please show me independent (non-partisan) studies of actual liberal bias in the media. I think you are confusing intelligence in media with being liberal. Ever consider that the news is just reporting bad gov't? Negative reporting on the right isn't proof of bias, just facts. Fox news is the only biased news reporting I have seen on regualar basis.
This shows you're incapable of analytical thinking. Everytime Fox news discusses issues on their commentary/opinion programs, there will always be two sided representation, (i.e. liberal and conservative viewpoints). I suspect you're not really watching FOXnews at all, and just picking up tidbits of misinformation from liberal blogs, pundits and leftwing demagogues to form your baseless opinions.
Are you referring to the mostly weak left people they have on the show, right outnumbering them 5-2 on average. Or the re-editing of interviews, mandates from execs to skew stories to the right, or the blatant lies passed of as no-spin.
So now you're branding them as 'weak'. Although your assesment is highly skewed and surely lifted from liberal blogs, that's better than 5-0 average representation on ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, not to mention the demoncrats official gazzettes, the LA times, NYtimes, Atlanta CJournal, WashPost etc.
There is a major difference. Fox claims it's no spin, and claims to have both sides represented (it doesn't). Cnn, and all the other groups make no such claim (except for fair reporting). Newspapers don't debate issues they have reporting and editorials. So you really have no argument.
Yeah Keep floating on limbo, KrammitASS, And keep smoking whatever you're smoking--while FOXnews kicks ass and beat all the other networks in ratings--COMBINED! And the liberal rags newspapers are losing stocks and readership.
Do you have a sheet of talking points beside your keyboard? Can you even remember the last time you thought for yourself? Rather fucked up once. O'liely lies blatantly and does it constantly, and never apologizes. Most of the time they try to cover it up. So what is your comparison again?
Kramm-itASS ...is the clear specimen of a liberal unhinged. He'd just shown he doesn't have a mind of his own and unquestioningly absorbed leftwing moonbats soundbites and peddle it as truth. So you allege O'Reily "blatantly lies constantly" but you have not one iota of evidence or an example to prove your point.
O'Reilly falsely claimed Bush didn't oppose 9-11 Commission. O'Reilly defended President George W. Bush from a Kerry-Edwards '04 TV ad highlighting Bush's opposition to creation of the 9-11 Commission by denying that Bush had ever opposed the commission. In fact, Bush did oppose the creation of the 9-11 Commission. (10/21/04)
O'Reilly cited phony stats to argue that taxes on rich are excessive. O'Reilly tried to "blow off" the argument that wealthy Americans ought to pay more taxes by citing phony statistics about the tax burden the rich currently bear. (6/30/04)
What are those 'phony statistics' that O'Reily cited? (the US taxpayers pay?) Let's see if you really know what you're taliking about. I'll give you my rebuttal after you answer this.
We will dissect these falsehoods one at a time that you sucked up from media matters. This will prove once and for all that you are just an unwitting tool, a pathetic useful idiot and a mindless sponge of your leftist masters.
now that's funny. You the o'lielly support going after me for quoting media matters. Have you ever gone to a right wing blog? Your an angry hypocrite that believes he has an informed opinion. I actually watch fox / cnn / bbc / pbs / cbc to get a wider view of the news. Ignoring any side of an argument makes you ignorant. The fact that you want to support o'lielly shows you are just that... ignorant.
To me ignorance is, 'cutting and pasting' leftwing blog rhetorics without understanding the context. You absorbed MMatter's opinion that Bush's taxcut caused the deficit when overboard spending is the impetus of it. In fact, the Bush's tax relief had increased the US revenue substantially in 2 years after passing.
Those media bias examples I cited were not 'copied and pasted' from 'rightwing bloggers' as you've just shamelessly done, Kramm-itASS-- but as a result of purely intelligent analytical thinking and keen observation of the obvious mainstream media's leftist liberal leaning. You'll be inundated if I used other reliable sources of the this fact. If you're watching all of them as you claimed, you probably noticed that by now-- if you're smart enough.
it would be impossible for your dumb ass to arrive at these clearly Bushist OPINIONS were you to employ purely analytical thinking. I'd suspect that you employ no thinking atall.
so the thrust of you 'arguments' in numerous post in here, are mainly cusses and curses and no substance--tadbohnehead.
What can I say, you're a leftist liberal moonbat, who is emotionally driven and doesn't use the brain much.
Ahhh these liberals..their so predictable, so transparent. They ususally pick up their "opinions" from Move on, Daily Kos, Huffington and other leftist loony website
Your ear might be perfect in hearing, but your brain is severely disconnected, 'earpeffect'. Most analytical thinkers would have figured this by now, that the highly partisan Demoncrats and their mainstream media cohorts, are all about their political party lines agenda of getting back to power-- at the expense of our national security and the survival of western civilization.
ok maybe your right but BOTH parties are filled with CROOKS and something has to change. i think that what we need to do is have a smaller federal government, one that follows the constitution, the document our country was founded on. we need to worry about the problems in our own country not go and fight an unwinnable war for oil money and greed.
At least you're a constructionist when it comes to our Constitution. I agree that government should be limited in managing public works and defense and not micro managing our lives through humongous social programs and entitlements--which the liberal socialist Demoncrats are very good at, so as to create a dependency class that can be bought and eventually vote for them. How do you know that the war on jihadists/terrorist is 'unwinnable', General Earpeffect?
first of all, i think it is unwinnable with our current strategy. what is our intended goal? is it to kill every terrorist in the world? because that is impossible and that is why president bush has a blank check to keep on fighting this war, and if everybody thought like him, it would never end. i mean whats next, iran? they have terrorists too. my point is that there is no defined goal and he will just keep running with it and taking away OUR freedoms in the process.
You seem to have no grasp of history at all. From the Munich Olympics massacre, US Embassy hostage taking in Iran, to the Al Fatah/PLO murders of innocent people at airports, I could go on and on of these Barbarians' goal to annihilate us and impose their medieval religion on our throats and achieve their caliphate state--open your eyes and see the consequential times we live in--somebody has to do it, and Bush stepped into the plate.
ok just forget about what i said. you are obviously more knowledgable about the facts. i know when to admit defeat. nobody has ever explained it like that. im 20 and to be honest i never really gave a fuck about politics but recently i have become extremely interested. you have many good points and both the news and you tube are pretty one-sided, one way or the other.
but the most obvious thing i noticed coming in was all of bush's lies: no wmd's, no osama, he called it mission accomplished right after we invaded iraq and we are still there. other than that there are millions of dollars missing and unnacounted for, 190000 weapons MIA, supposedly he violated the constitution countless times, to be honest everything is so fucked up to me that i dont really know what to believe and that is why im on here debating with people.
Congress just gave Bush his intelligence plan to monitor the enemy's potential terrorist schemes and chatters--so which part of the Constitution specifically, did Mr. Bush violated? Listen to me young man, try to get both sides of the argument, and use your analytical thought process to arrive at the truth, learn true history, and not the revised one that the liberals teaches in public schools.
so since you know the facts so well, tell me general tacticomp, where did the money go? where is the money from the oil? where are these wmd's and are we going after iran next? wasnt the oil money supposed to pay for reconstruction costs? how long can america afford to be in iraq and is that enough time? how many soldiers are you willing to sacrifice for this cause? and most importantly, would YOU be willing to fight for mr. bush??
Eardeffect, The epitome of a clueless simplistic leftist moonbat, who sucks up Daily Kos et al talking points and Demoncrats soundbites without analytical thinking.
UN resolution 1441 was the mission bonehead (do your own reading)and that was accomplished. And just like the post WW2 'Marshall Plan', nation building takes time. You leftists protested that it was all 'Blood for Oil', now that you found out that we're not getting any share of it, you want a piece of their oil profits. So which it?
Iraq's oil revenue was averaging 97Billion/yr, being provincially distributed by the central gov't. Iraq's parliament is drafting a bill to repay the war's costs, (again do your own reading). We live in consequential times, there are insane fundamentalist fanatics who wants to annihilate us and shove their medieval religion down our throats. Sacrifices is essential for our survival. WW2 had 405,000 casualties just to preserve your freedom and your right to be as stupid.
IAM currently fighting for the country. Fighting its domestic enemies that comprises the leftist, liberal, socialist, Stalinist loonies like you, who wants to destroy this country.
Since you're 20, why don't you make the sacrifice and serve our country, get out of your parent's home, get a life, instead of sitting in front of a computer all day.
You should be fighting to stop the corruption of the righ wing agenda. That's what you should be fighting for. Larry Craig just another one that has been outted for being a hypocrite.
Funny you mentioned 'corruption', Jilianca. Hillary was just caught accepting illegal campaign donations from a fugitive Chinese businessman, Norman Shui, who was flagrantly violating Campaign finance reform by funneling campaign funds thru pawns, like a Chinese family with an annual income of 45k/yr but donated 230,000 to Hillary. So before You throw stones, try looking at your Demoncrat backyard trash, instead of engaging in liberal demagoguery, so you wouldn't end up as the bigger hypocrite.
Since we're on the topic of corruption, Jiliannca. Demoncrat congressman William Jefferson (La) is under criminal indictment for bribery and was caught red handed with $90,000 bribe money (10,000 was spent) in his freezer; Bill Clinton (remember him?) pardoned 140 people in exchange for 'donations' (100k minimum) using his brother, Hillary, her brother as 'brokers'
They also truned the lincoln bedroom into 'motel 6' for campaign donations.
I could go on and on, on the long list of corruptions the Liberal Demoncrats have (and are) engaged in, way much longer than the Republicans. And when Republicans get into a scandal, fellow Republicans are principled enough to rebuke their fellow reps--while the Demoncrats abet the act, circle their wagons and vilify their accusers with the politics of personal destruction.
The difference is the republicans act as if they walk on water. Then they prove they aren't so perfect. That's the difference. As far as Hillary accepting a dontation . ANYONE can make a donation to any party. Everyone can't be investigated each time they make a donation. Keep it REAL!
If you're earning $45,000 a year, like Mr Paw, a letter carrier, and never donated to any campaign or candidate before and then you suddenly made a contribution of $230,000 to a candidate (Hillary)--you just raised a red flag and should be looked into. Imagine if this is a Republican presidential candidate--I'll bet you'll be the first in line to ask for an investigation and the elite liberal media will be all over it.
Here's another 'differrence' between the two parties: When a Demoncrat get into a scandal, other Demoncrats will circle the wagon, abet and defend the scandal, vilify the accusers with the politics of personal destruction and even promote the accused to a higher position--just like senator Gerry Studd (D) who had many sexual relations with a congressional page. While Republicans are principled enough to castigate and distance themselves from the scandal and the accused.
The point is that Republican's vote against rights for gays, lesbians and transexuals but then they end up being just THAT. Yes, "RED FLAGGED" contribution should be investigated. Anyone can make a contrubution is my point.
What are you going to do when transexuals such as myself MAKE the religious right decide if we are men or women? We will walk in front of the capital with no shirts on. At that point they will arrest us for indecent exposure. Then when they do they will learn that according to their own standards, we are men they will have to allow us to do that. OR allow us to marry, it's their choice. Either we walk around topless like other men or they allow us to marry. Now that's gonna be funny.
If the government sees us as gay men, then we should be able to walk around topless like other men. If they see us as women, we should be able to marry the man we love.
But the problem is, you're NOT a woman as originally created by God, Jiliannca. So you cannot force individuals or the government, (run by individuals) to look at you otherwise, just because you think you're a woman. To force your minority 'belief' and impose it on the majority, to change established norms and institutions of society just because you feel that way is just not right.
Nobody, not even the 'religious right' is making you decide if you're going to be a man or a woman, jiliannca. YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING THAT DECISION and you are imposing that decision on the rest of society by your militant views. And making us choose from the proverbial 'lesser of the two evil' choices you've presented--and to me that's funny because no thinking individual will be force into a corner to choose between the two.
I'm not asking them to tell me if I'm a man or a woman. I'm telling them that they can't have it both ways. I'm giving them the option. I'll walk around topless with my 38c's for everyone to see or they can allow me to marry my man. It's up to them.
Jiliannca, Republicans, DO NOT vote against the rights of any individual--they are voting against the extreme gay militant's agenda of tearing down and destroying society's sacrosanct institution of marriage, which has sustain humanity and procreation for thousands of years.
I have been going thru media matters, and I have to admit that's way to far left for my taste. I actually disagree with about 1/2 of the points (too naive)they are trying to make. However they do have direct links to un-edited reports that are valid.
O'Reilly confused on elementary economics. O'Reilly told a caller on his radio show, "We [the United States] have a trade deficit with everybody, because everybody wants our stuff, and we're not wild about snails" -- indicating that he doesn't know the definition of "trade deficit" and implying that the United States runs a trade surplus with France. In fact, in the first four months of 2004, the United States had a $3 billion trade deficit with France. (6/10/04)
O'Reilly doctored quotation to suggest Soros wished his own father dead. During his smear campaign against progressive financier, philanthropist, and political activist George Soros, O'Reilly doctored a 1995 quotation by Soros to make it seem as if Soros wished his own father dead. (6/1/04)
oh this is going to be fun. Where should I start. This may take all day with the limited posting allowed. O'Reilly falsely claimed Bush didn't oppose 9-11 Commission. O'Reilly defended President George W. Bush from a Kerry-Edwards '04 TV ad highlighting Bush's opposition to creation of the 9-11 Commission by denying that Bush had ever opposed the commission. In fact, Bush did oppose the creation of the 9-11 Commission. (10/21/04)
O'Reilly fabricated "Paris Business Review" as source for success of French boycott. O'Reilly falsely claimed "they've lost billions of dollars in France according to 'The Paris Business Review'" due to an American boycott he advocated of French imports. Media Matters for America found no evidence of a publication named "The Paris Business Review." (4/27/04)
Aha! I knew it! 'Media Matters'! This is like the communist manifesto of the left--the 'opinion farm' of the mind numb robots leftist moonbats to form their opinions, simply because of their inability to think for themselves. They can't even explain the rhetorics and the demagoguery found there.
O'Reilly disparaged Democrats with trifecta of voter falsehoods. In a discussion about what went wrong for Democrats in the November 2 election, O'Reilly claimed that Democrats "lost votes from four years ago"; that "18- to 24[-year-old]s didn't go" to the polls; and that "[c]ommitted Republicans didn't carry the day for the president; independents did." All three claims are false. (11/4/04)
O'Reilly on the radio: Three lies, one broadcast. Lie No. 1: Bush tax cuts didn't create the budget deficit. Lie No. 2: "Socialistic" French, Germans, and Canadian governments tax at 80 percent. Lie No. 3: Canadian, British, and French media are "government-controlled," but Italian media is free. (7/7/04)
These demagogouery just proves my thesis that Leftwing moonbats like Kramm-itASS doesn't think for themselves. This was obviously lifted from leftists, liberal blogs like 'Media Matters' or 'Daily Kos'. Claims that Useful Idiots like Krammit 'crams' into their empty heads, use as their 'talking points without question, and suck it up as truths. Let's tackle no.1, why do you think that the tax relief caused the deficit?
funny how you just floated over all the other points... Picking and choosing your battles? I.e. I can't argue fully the tax issue, and neither can you. But o'lielly just stated it as a fact. "Bush tax cuts didn't create the budget deficit". No one can say either way, but o'lielly seems to think he can!
Equating a commentator (O'Reily) to a News anchor (Dan Rather), shows your ignorance and lack of analytical thinking, Kramm-itASS. While one is to supposed to deliver the news, the other is to comment on it. Rather's video package docu was the supposed 'missing (Nat. Guard) 6 months' of Bush's services, (which he produced faked documents) and not the scope of his guard service as you foolishly assert.
Since you live in a socialist (pattern) country, (where "free health care" is not really 'free'-- the working class pays for it), tally how much you're paying in sales, gas, groceries, services, local, state, property, social security, and income taxes? Everything you do is taxed and here in the US, will come up to a total of 47 to 50+ to a dollar earned, depending on your bracket. So the more entitlements programs the government implement, the more taxes it impose to pay for these 'freebies.
well we don't pay state, or social security.. that's your country. Who cares if our tax base is higher, but if that gives us health care, better education, respect on the world stage, higher standard of living, budget surplus, lower crime... etc. What about the fact that the mast majority of your income tax goes to paying interest on the national debt? At least our tax isn't wasted.
If the average US taxpayer is paying almost half of every dollar earned, and taking six months (May) to complete their tax obligations. What more of France, Germany, Canada and other Socialist countries, whose entitlements (freebies) programs are up to the roof. Chances are, they are paying 60,70,80% tax burden. O'Reily's assessment might be exagerated, but could be closely accurate by going for the highest possible scenario.
See, you just admitted that you Canadians are paying your taxes through the roof (and paying for somebody's welfare entitlements). And it looks like you don't mind playing the 'Peter' to pay for Paul's needs. This class envy and class warfare seems to work well on people like you-- Leftist Liberals. "Give man a bread and he will eat for one day, teach him how to fish, and he can eat for the rest of his life."
BTW I now have you to thank regarding media matters. I actually never visited them until I had to research o'lielly lies. It's funny that no sites go into rebutting these points. I have spent about 20 minutes on media matters and have found several 3rd party non partisan reports. Where are yours? I know now why you were slamming it. Your just another scared of the truth righty.
You went overboard in taking my (google) advice and did a hell of a 'cut & paste' plagiarism to establish your 'opinion' and 'crammit' (pun intended) all in here. We're not impressed, Kramm-itASS.
Your naiveted is also laughable, believing that an ultra leftwing blog like 'Media Matters' will link a 'non partisan' link to their website.
My first reaction after seeing your 'cut and paste' opinions, is that they were obviously lifted from some blog. And when you finally cited MMatters as your 'source', your credibility (or what's left of it)just went down the drain, Kramm-itASS. Admitting that you don't know much about taxes and yet injecting your lifted false opinions about it, is not smart. Try studying GDP, Revenues, Deficit and national debt before mouthing off and playing a psuedo-intellectual.
tadbohnehead hates FOXNEWS so much, I can bet that he never watch it. He's the epitome of left's blind hatred for those who expose their liberal lunacy, that they are transformed into a manaical schizoids, willing to kill the truth messengers.
How could you be a FOXNEWS expert, you don't even watch, KrammitASS. More than likely, you've seen a snipet of a show or news program, or lift up some leftist blog talking points ( I know, I've come accross your opinion before in some leftist moonbat blog) And now you're speaking like the all knowing Al Gore who pontificate and lecture us with dubious 'facts' and fake science.
No wonder you're clueless on what the true situation in the mainstream media. Your're being Canadian is surely a factor, (for Celine Dion is the 'best' Canada can offer). Secondly, You're waiting for an 'independent' studies to do show you the obvious.
I guess if you psyche believes that FOX is 'biased', then you must be really DUMB and has a screwed analytical thought process. (not surprising among Liberals)
So your admitting you have no proof, and your argument is based on "faith" in theses matters. Ok.. now your off topic again. What's the matter am I getting to close to the facts. You should make sure you can back up your statements before you post.
If this is how soldiers are treated for serving their government then I'm never going to war for my country. I first noticed Vietnam, then the gulf war, now even this one. Fuck the American government. I wonder if Canada is facing the same issue.
youknownoyuno 8 months ago
So what, what do you expect, it's a free market so get fucked!!! You all voted for it, suck it up and fucking deal with it, or do something about it...
hanzaninja3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I enjoyed your video, If you need help getting your video exposed i use a service at Tubeviews . Net They offer views, ratings, and comments. They helped my video get ranked on the first page
this is awesome
Danielzxqwa 2 years ago
This coming from someone who lets failed film makers tell him how to think.
LLLLLLLLP3 3 years ago
type in bullshit walmart
LLLLLLLLP3 3 years ago
Impeach Bush! Impeach Chenney! This is crazy!
mommasigma 3 years ago
On what legal grounds, Momma?
Combat45 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
robert is a guy who couldnt make it in movies google(xanadu)so he smears fox, walmart(type in penn & teller bs) to make his money.
LLLLLLLLP3 3 years ago
Uhh... you're posting this on his site. And how does he "smear Fox, WalMart, etc."? With movies.
But I think you mean his fiction films. In which case, he's made recent ones, and "Steal This Movie" wasn't bad.
itstheit 3 years ago
stfu you repube sheep
ipwnorcs 3 years ago
LLLP3: At the time he made Xanadu, he had very little experience as a director. That being said, this really isn't even about Robert Greenwald. This is about the treasonous scandals he documents and exposes to the masses. But you obviously can't defend THAT so you decided to attack the messenger. How typical.
SnoozieQZ 3 years ago
Dick Cheney was one of the head honchos for Halliburton before he went for Vice President.
blacksteel25 4 years ago
Not "one of the head honchos" Dick Cheney WAS THE head of Halliburton.
pandoratalks 4 years ago 2
And Cheney still has 12.7m in stock options in Haliburton. He also has a US$12.5m mansion waiting for him in Dubai (where Haliburton are now based, to avoid US corporation taxes) and he can rely on Blackwater to provide him with security for the rest of his worthless life.
Silberdachs 3 years ago 5
i don't like this civilization anymore.
CheeezMaster 4 years ago 5
@CheeezMaster
It never was a civilization.
MsMadame 1 year ago
Sad to say Greenwald was 100% wrong when he portrayed a Democratically controlled House and Senate and a Waxman Chairmanship as a fix for this.
The Bush Defense and Justice departments are colluding in a cover up to sweep this theft under the rug.
Nothing, NOTHING short of an IMPEACHMENT stands a chance of cleaning up this organized criminality.
nilent 4 years ago 3
Why don't you go donate some money to the Catholic Church. I hear they are pass around a collection plate to pay back the victims their preists molested over the years. Go help your Christian people. Hurrry, run!!!
jiliannca 4 years ago
The problem is ..I'm not Catholic.
You just made my point about homosexuals. Lust controls their 'lifestyle'--overpowered and deceived by the evil one.
But there's salvation, jillianca, God died for your sins, ask Him for forgiveness and be truly sorry for all your sins, surrender your life to Him--He is the only way, the truth and the life, who could free you from the deception of the evil one.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Stop preaching to me! Lust controls many "people", not all. Take a look into your own back yard. Why don't you spend your time helping pass a law to make divorcing illegal. Isn't it a sin to divorce?
jiliannca 4 years ago
Typical right winged Christian. You just don't get it. Go away, you're boring me.
jiliannca 4 years ago 2
jilianca: "Typical right winged Christian. You just don't get it. Go away, you're boring me".
Typical Christian bashing Gay who simply cannot withstand those who slap them with the reality of 'accountability' for their wordly actions.
tacticomp 4 years ago
...Did you just insult yourself? XD
Riuka 4 years ago
If marriage is such a perfect thing. Then you should be out promoting laws against divorce. Are you out doing that? NO....of course not. Typical hypocrite.
jiliannca 4 years ago
Where did I even hinted that marriage or everything is perfect, jiliannca? The causes of divorces varies from, Lust, (Adultery); Greed, (money problems); cruelty and Oppression, (domestic Violence) etc. Which proves my point, that Evil thrives. And when you let the evil one (Devil) take control of your life, instead of God, you will surely get lost in the wilderness of life or the valley of misery and death.
tacticomp 4 years ago
So what your saying is that straight people are the same sinners as gay people. So why not let gay people marry if they love each other? How does it hurt YOU? It doesn't! Mind your own business. Go adopt some of these parentless children your breeders have created.
jiliannca 4 years ago
We are all sinners, not one is free from sin, jiliannca.
Our only difference is how we acknowledge our sins to God and Surrender our lives to Him, so he could give us wisdom, strength and discernment, take over and lead us to the right path and veer us away from evil to avoid committing additional sins.
tacticomp 4 years ago
You worry about YOUR sins and I will worry about my own. Stay out of my business and stop preaching to me. Don't cram your lifestyle down my throat.
jiliannca 4 years ago
I'll pray for you too, jiliannca. That you'll leave a life of sin and surrender your life to Him.
tacticomp 4 years ago
As I said before. You need to be looking into your own backyard before you start worrying about what's in mine. YOU leave the life of sin and stop promoting HATE. Stop prmoting parentless children. Stop breeding HATE. Stop craming your lifestyle upon others.
jiliannca 4 years ago
Your reading comprehension is as bad as your thinking (or the lack of it), jilianca. You first spewed diatibes on Christians & personally attacked me. I aptly defended my values & core beliefs, never once 'imposing' it on you. Deception is the devil's weapon. He took advantage of your weakness and fooled you into believing you're a woman, to marry a man and adopt a child and make you feel that you're doing the world a favor by "saving the orphans children"
tacticomp 4 years ago
It's ironic you're giving me advice on leaving a life of sin, yet YOU ARE living a sinful lifestyle, jiliannca. Ironic that you're telling me to stop promoting hatred, yet you've spewed hateful rhetorics in our exchanges.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Stay out of my business! You live your live and I will live mine. Stop craming your radical religion down my throat. You should spend more time adopting children that were bread by your breeders and have no homes because of the right to marry, breed and divorce like it's such a wonderful thing.
jiliannca 4 years ago
Religion causes war! You are a prime example of it. You don't walk on water. You need to look into your own backyard and clean it up before you look in to mine.
jiliannca 4 years ago
You're dead wrong, jilliannca--EVIL CAUSES WAR. Evil that brought unprecedented cruelty, greed, turmoil, oppression, destruction, LUST (the main component of homosexuality, not love), megalomania and narcissism. And evil should be stopped dead on it tracks at all cost, because..
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" (quote by Edmund Burke)
tacticomp 4 years ago
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! This is just too funny! You honestly think that 'evil' causes war? Please! Reserch history. The middle ages was prtically about God, and claming others in the name of God. Advancing to the new world and killing the natives has God's name written all over it too. Oh! The Salem Witch Trials! She's a wtich! Unpure! Burn her! For it is Gods will to rid that of evil! Yea... Evil... Ha ha ha!
Riuka 4 years ago
Using the name of God in vain, is in itself evil, Ruinka. Any bonehead can figure that out. Those who uses God as an excuse to do evil things, like killing innocent civilians, 'infidels' or 'kafirs', who don't agree with their beliefs (sounds familiar?) and subjugation by the sword is their main goal (the start of the medieval religious wars that brought the Crusades)
Looks like Ruinka's brain got ruined by liberal indoctrination.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Oh the iorny in this. Who uses Gods name in vain more then your average athiest? Those who uses God as an excuse to do evil things, are the exacte people you associate yourself with. And the Crusaders... AHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! Please! The Crusaders are in the same religous catagoy you are in. They worship the same God you are today.
It would seem that not only does tacticomp cannot spell names correctly, but a narrow minded human that owned no one but him/her self.
Riuka 4 years ago
The problem with the loony left like Ruinka, is that they don't recognize evil when they see it, even when it's happening right before their very eyes. In their sick perverted twisted mind, afflicted with DDH4B syndrome (Demented, Deranged Hatred for Bush), they would declare Bush as evil, while they embrace and applaud the obvious, proven evils of the world, like Ahmadinejad, Saddam, Hassad, Osama, Castro, Chavez et al.
tacticomp 4 years ago
The problem with this sorry excuse for a carbon unit who named him/her self tacticomp is that the very religion s/he is defeinding is the same group that has evil. Even God has an evil side. The bible says it it self. Not so perfict anymore now is it?
And where the hell did this DDHFB come from? Not once did I mention Bush and already I am labled a Bush hater. As 'suprising' as this may seem, I don't hate Bush. But I don't like him either. So, once again, where is your excuse?
Riuka 4 years ago
'carbon unit'? this is an obvious sign that you're a Leftist Liberal and Gore Groupie, who swear by his lies, that one of your judges even court ordered it to be exposed. But I digress.
Since you're an "expert" on the bible, show me the passage where you claim "God has an evil side".
tacticomp 4 years ago
Alright, I'll tell you right now, since you obviously do not know me as well as you think you do, there is a fine line between democrates and liberal. So before you call me a liberal, think of who you are insulting instead, cause it is sure as hell not me.
Riuka 4 years ago
"If it quacks like a duck....
If you keep repeating what the Liberal left of this country is saying, and you have a striking resemblance on positions and issues, then your subconscious is exposing you for what you are--a closet liberal.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Yea... You still don't get it. For one, I still want to know where the political side came from. Not once did I mention anything political and already I am being labeled a liberal. How crude of you.
And tell me, what have I said that has anything to do with liberal, hmmm? I really want to know where this came from.
Riuka 4 years ago
"You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the LORD your God, am a JEALOUS God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, and on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me"
Deuteronomy 5:9
Is envy not one of the seven sins you were preaching about?
Riuka 4 years ago
Define 'envy', as well as 'Jealousy' and you'll get your answer, Ruinka.
tacticomp 4 years ago
jealousy n 1: a feeling of jealous envy (especially of a rival)
Envy v. i. 1. To be filled with envious feelings; to regard anything with grudging and longing eyes; -- used especially with at.
Riuka 4 years ago
See the difference now?
tacticomp 4 years ago
Do you mean aside the fact the envy is in jealousy?
Riuka 4 years ago
And what happen to the gay city Sodom? The bible said that God demolished it because it was filled with homosexuals. The giver of life that takes life. I though he was suppost to be viewed as a God of Peace. So why kill so many? And so soon before they live out their lives? I mean, shouldn't he let them live and then condem them to the fiery pits of hell? Hmmm?
Riuka 4 years ago
Oh and by the way, LUST is the main component of every homo sapiens on this planet. Your heterosexual, simple minded, christian mind refuse to think otherwise.
Riuka 4 years ago
Looks like Ruinka is an expert on 'LUST' and can psycho-analyze every 'homosapiens' on this planet. So a gay pedophile who lust and preys on children, is not part of that 'simple minded', simplistic, gobbledygook, psychobabble of a generalization. I think we smart people can figure out that 'lust' is one of the 7 deadly sins that personifies evil.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Oh wow! Arn't you ever so sure of yourself. So what about a heterosexual pedophile? Don't they count too? And why are you singeling out homosexuals? Don't you know that heterosexuals out number homos? And please! Heteros are sining every single day and night. All seven deadly sins. Their lust is no different from homos. The only differences is gender. What's your excuse now?
Riuka 4 years ago
The metaphor just swished by your head, RUINka. I'm not surprised that you're slow, and you didn't even get the 'deliberate mispelling'
So let's backtract for your benefit.
you said:
"LUST is the main component of every homo sapiens on this planet. Your heterosexual, simple minded, christian mind refuse to think otherwise"
I made an analogy on lust as evil and didn't confine it to heterosexuals. Looks like I hit a nerve huh, RUINka.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Why do you people keep breeding homosexuals if you don't like them? Homosexuals can't breed children. LMAO Talk to your people about breeding homosexuals.....won't you?
jiliannca 4 years ago
I didn't say I don't like them--'I hate the sin but not the sinner'. Because there is hope and forgiveness for all our sins, for we are all sinners, jillianca
tacticomp 4 years ago
Why do your hetrosexual people keep breeding 14 year old murders like the one yesterday in Ohio? Talk to your people who are breeding this stuff!!! Run Now!!
jiliannca 4 years ago
How can you be sure, jillianca? were you in Ohio and in the bedroom when Ma and Pa are doing it?
You see, you speculate so much on so many things in this blog--that I'm really, really questioning again your rational ability to debate.
(Not that I've known that from the very start you've uttered your ludicrous arguments).
tacticomp 4 years ago
Homosexuality is not something that can be breeded.
Riuka 4 years ago
They come from Heterosexuals right? You can't blame homosexuals for breeding them. Homosexuals can't breed.
jiliannca 4 years ago
They are born from heterosexuals, true. But heterosexual are not breeding them to be homosexuals. Homosexuals develoupe their own sexuality at some point in time. Their own develoupment and something they accept. This is something you cannot place on heteros.
Riuka 4 years ago
At least I am decent enough not to diliberatly mispell your name, for I have given you that much respect as a christian. Even though at this point you do not derserve it.
Riuka 4 years ago
Christians doesn't defend and justify a lifestyle what God disapproved of and declared an abomination.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Which is why I am an ahtiest. Because your God is promotes more hate then love towards me.
Riuka 4 years ago
I find it creapy that people would follow a book that would promote someone to kill and then act as if it's no big deal and then have the nerve to call my life a sin. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
jiliannca 4 years ago
"LUST (the main component of homosexuality, not love)"
I made an analogy that you believe that those who love their partner with the same chromosone structure only lust for each other and feels nothing for their partner but the need to rut. This is where, once again, your heterosexual christian mind refuse to believe that there is such a thing called love in the homosexual community. Hit a nerve? Not really. Not from you. Never from you. You silly thing.
Riuka 4 years ago
Love can exist--even with animals. but that doesn't justify a sinful abomination.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Oh I see how this works. You can make assumptions but when I do it, I have problems debating. Typical narrow mind still going strong at work I see. Hey "Mr. I Walk On Water", could you answer a few questions from the bible for me? I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?
jiliannca 4 years ago
Then why are you proclaiming that there is no love among the gay community and only lust? That is what you said. Lust is what made homosexuality, not love. A sinful abomination? What is NOT considered an abomination?
Riuka 4 years ago
I wouldn't dare look at your backyard, jiliannca--I will only see filth and degradation of the human soul.
tacticomp 4 years ago
I don't need you to judge me. Only god should do that.
jiliannca 4 years ago
Have you ever thought that gay people loving each other is a way of god to allow 2 people 2 love each other and controlling the population at the same time? You breeders need to stop breeding, having abortions or leaving children in orphanages. I'm sure god would prefer gay marriage over overpopulating!
jiliannca 4 years ago
You can love anyone you like--you can love and have sex with a dog for all I care, jiliannca--but don't shove your lifestyle down our throats and change the world's scared societal institutions in the process. God already declared that the homosexuality is an abomination and would not condone this chosen lifestyle. Be careful who you accuse of abortions, I abhor it. Under population is now the biggest problem in Europe that Muslims have slowly taking over.
tacticomp 4 years ago
YOUR god may say that about homosexuals, but mine doesn't. He CREATED them. I have a choice to choose who my god is in this country. Don't cram YOUR lifestyle down my throat when you are the ones breeding homosexuals. Under poplulation? What about the 100,000's of children dying today in Africa and other nations? Did your god want this? Typical radical Christians are what are ruining this earth!
jiliannca 4 years ago
There is only one true God--and he died on the cross for your sins. He is the way, the truth, and the life---The only way to salvation is trough Him by being sorry of your sinful ways and surrender your life to Him.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Glad you mentioned the dying children in Africa, jiliannca--because it clearly proves my point that evil is the cause of man's miseries.--the evil corrupt men that run the governments of that nation is the main cause of their situation. We have almost the same population, vis a vis, their many nation states, and yet we don't have the malaise that these evil greedy, corrupt government officials had caused those small nations.
tacticomp 4 years ago
What about the children living in foster homes in this country? How many have you adopted since you feel their is an underpopulation? I can't belive your promoting procreation when children are already living in HELL! Your a sick person. Go pray for yourself.
jiliannca 4 years ago
I have my own Children, It is only logical to say that those who don't have the biological ability to have children should adopt.--which many Christians do. And our ministry supports many institutions including orphanages.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Just continue to prove your ignorance. Homosexual people CAN have children but many do not. Some do. I can assure you they won't raise their children to be a biggot like yourself. It will be funny when you find that your very own children question their own sexuality and will perhaps determine they are homosexual. LMAO. It COULD happen to one or more of your children you know? WAKE UP!
jiliannca 4 years ago
Who I marry doesn't affect you. You have no business deciding for me who I should marry. Just as I have no business helping you decice. People marry everyday that cannot procreate. I suppose you think they shouldn't marry also?
jiliannca 4 years ago
How could this president WANT to allow Mexican Trucks to travel all over this country? What happend to his "National Security" promise? This is crazy.
jiliannca 4 years ago
This is just one of the many frustrations we true conservatives have on the President--he had abandoned some of the our core beliefs and values that many conservative voters didn't show up last election and made the Demoncrats gained some seats in the senate. And the Demoncrats also took advantage of this quagmire and fielded so many 'conservative' candidates (and pushed conservative values to sound like one) to fool the people, and it worked--they gain Congress back.
tacticomp 4 years ago
another point is that IF president bush was really trying to stop terrorists, why doesnt he actually use some of the money to help the refugees because that is a huge resource for al qaeda. they leave home, dont get help from us because they are supposedly not our problem and who offers to feed them and help them in return for their loyalty?
earpeffect 4 years ago
You really didn't learn the lessons of history, Ear(in)ffection. Guess what? If we cut and run and surrender now in the global battlefront on terrorism, as what the Liberal Demoncrats are bent on doing. Just like Vietnam, genocide will follow and throngs of refugees will flee (remember the boat people?) Guess where will they end up? in your neighborhood. And you wouldn't know who amongst them will cut your throat.
tacticomp 4 years ago
So if you're main concern are refugees, then let's make sure the boat people syndrome won't happen again and give Iraq's thriving democracy and chance to run its course, like the 'Marshall Plan' in Europe and Japan after WW2, it took them years to stand on their own and made progress--look at them now.
tacticomp 4 years ago
April 16th 2003.Read CNN archived document about halliburton contract in Iraq from as back as april 2003. money.c nn. com/2003/04/16/news/economy/war_oil_primer/index. h tm
Fixhist 4 years ago
With pasty Republican cockroaches in government we're always gonna have unnecessary war, war-profiteering, graft, cronyism, and self-righteous drivel.
I hate Republicans.
dizzymasekela 4 years ago
No wonder you're so Dizzy(Masekela)--Because you're a moron.
Demoncrats Presidents were in office during most of the US involvements in major wars, from WW1, WW2, Korean war, VIETNAM war, and KOSOVO. I bet your African village unanimously voted you as their village idiot.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Combat45 and tacticomp are just trying to discredit the video and all its points. Dont listen to their crap.
drdapoo 4 years ago
Iraq in Fragments has some valid points, but most of it is the same thing that liberals bitch about.. Fear tactics and emotional branding
Jomolocon 4 years ago
Combat45 and tacticomp are the forum trolls of the 21st centuary!
Get a fucking life you losers (btw they're redneck brothers) xD
badfex 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DON'T READ You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved , sorry
DMURADringling 4 years ago
google
bush
crime
family
theone23ord 4 years ago
It will link you to the 'useful idiots' site of the demoncrats' talking points, as the source of the rhetoric and demagoguery.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Now that the Dems have the House and Senate I have yet to hear about Haliburton or these other companies being brought before them in any investigation. I guess the Dems are being bought off as well.
redviper101 4 years ago
Please show me independent (non-partisan) studies of actual liberal bias in the media. I think you are confusing intelligence in media with being liberal. Ever consider that the news is just reporting bad gov't? Negative reporting on the right isn't proof of bias, just facts. Fox news is the only biased news reporting I have seen on regualar basis.
krammitAll 4 years ago
This shows you're incapable of analytical thinking. Everytime Fox news discusses issues on their commentary/opinion programs, there will always be two sided representation, (i.e. liberal and conservative viewpoints). I suspect you're not really watching FOXnews at all, and just picking up tidbits of misinformation from liberal blogs, pundits and leftwing demagogues to form your baseless opinions.
Combat45 4 years ago
Are you referring to the mostly weak left people they have on the show, right outnumbering them 5-2 on average. Or the re-editing of interviews, mandates from execs to skew stories to the right, or the blatant lies passed of as no-spin.
krammitAll 4 years ago
So now you're branding them as 'weak'. Although your assesment is highly skewed and surely lifted from liberal blogs, that's better than 5-0 average representation on ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, not to mention the demoncrats official gazzettes, the LA times, NYtimes, Atlanta CJournal, WashPost etc.
Combat45 4 years ago
There is a major difference. Fox claims it's no spin, and claims to have both sides represented (it doesn't). Cnn, and all the other groups make no such claim (except for fair reporting). Newspapers don't debate issues they have reporting and editorials. So you really have no argument.
krammitAll 4 years ago
Yeah Keep floating on limbo, KrammitASS, And keep smoking whatever you're smoking--while FOXnews kicks ass and beat all the other networks in ratings--COMBINED! And the liberal rags newspapers are losing stocks and readership.
Combat45 4 years ago
fox news is constantly going down in ratings. SO your point is? show me your comparitive stats.
krammitAll 4 years ago
Huh....there' this internet...that Al Gore 'invented'
Don't be a parasite, Use it! (and 'krammit' all (the information) on where your brain is located...down there.
Combat45 4 years ago
Do you have a sheet of talking points beside your keyboard? Can you even remember the last time you thought for yourself? Rather fucked up once. O'liely lies blatantly and does it constantly, and never apologizes. Most of the time they try to cover it up. So what is your comparison again?
krammitAll 4 years ago
Kramm-itASS ...is the clear specimen of a liberal unhinged. He'd just shown he doesn't have a mind of his own and unquestioningly absorbed leftwing moonbats soundbites and peddle it as truth. So you allege O'Reily "blatantly lies constantly" but you have not one iota of evidence or an example to prove your point.
Combat45 4 years ago
O'Reilly falsely claimed Bush didn't oppose 9-11 Commission. O'Reilly defended President George W. Bush from a Kerry-Edwards '04 TV ad highlighting Bush's opposition to creation of the 9-11 Commission by denying that Bush had ever opposed the commission. In fact, Bush did oppose the creation of the 9-11 Commission. (10/21/04)
krammitAll 4 years ago
O'Reilly cited phony stats to argue that taxes on rich are excessive. O'Reilly tried to "blow off" the argument that wealthy Americans ought to pay more taxes by citing phony statistics about the tax burden the rich currently bear. (6/30/04)
krammitAll 4 years ago
What are those 'phony statistics' that O'Reily cited? (the US taxpayers pay?) Let's see if you really know what you're taliking about. I'll give you my rebuttal after you answer this.
Combat45 4 years ago
We will dissect these falsehoods one at a time that you sucked up from media matters. This will prove once and for all that you are just an unwitting tool, a pathetic useful idiot and a mindless sponge of your leftist masters.
Combat45 4 years ago
now that's funny. You the o'lielly support going after me for quoting media matters. Have you ever gone to a right wing blog? Your an angry hypocrite that believes he has an informed opinion. I actually watch fox / cnn / bbc / pbs / cbc to get a wider view of the news. Ignoring any side of an argument makes you ignorant. The fact that you want to support o'lielly shows you are just that... ignorant.
krammitAll 4 years ago
To me ignorance is, 'cutting and pasting' leftwing blog rhetorics without understanding the context. You absorbed MMatter's opinion that Bush's taxcut caused the deficit when overboard spending is the impetus of it. In fact, the Bush's tax relief had increased the US revenue substantially in 2 years after passing.
Combat45 4 years ago
Those media bias examples I cited were not 'copied and pasted' from 'rightwing bloggers' as you've just shamelessly done, Kramm-itASS-- but as a result of purely intelligent analytical thinking and keen observation of the obvious mainstream media's leftist liberal leaning. You'll be inundated if I used other reliable sources of the this fact. If you're watching all of them as you claimed, you probably noticed that by now-- if you're smart enough.
Combat45 4 years ago
it would be impossible for your dumb ass to arrive at these clearly Bushist OPINIONS were you to employ purely analytical thinking. I'd suspect that you employ no thinking atall.
tedbohne 4 years ago
And your point is......
tacticomp 4 years ago
actually he's just a dumb sonofabitch!
tedbohne 4 years ago
so the thrust of you 'arguments' in numerous post in here, are mainly cusses and curses and no substance--tadbohnehead.
What can I say, you're a leftist liberal moonbat, who is emotionally driven and doesn't use the brain much.
Ahhh these liberals..their so predictable, so transparent. They ususally pick up their "opinions" from Move on, Daily Kos, Huffington and other leftist loony website
tacticomp 4 years ago
your a dumbass. this isnt about republicans or democrats they are both crooks. vote ron paul
earpeffect 4 years ago
Your ear might be perfect in hearing, but your brain is severely disconnected, 'earpeffect'. Most analytical thinkers would have figured this by now, that the highly partisan Demoncrats and their mainstream media cohorts, are all about their political party lines agenda of getting back to power-- at the expense of our national security and the survival of western civilization.
tacticomp 4 years ago
ok maybe your right but BOTH parties are filled with CROOKS and something has to change. i think that what we need to do is have a smaller federal government, one that follows the constitution, the document our country was founded on. we need to worry about the problems in our own country not go and fight an unwinnable war for oil money and greed.
earpeffect 4 years ago
At least you're a constructionist when it comes to our Constitution. I agree that government should be limited in managing public works and defense and not micro managing our lives through humongous social programs and entitlements--which the liberal socialist Demoncrats are very good at, so as to create a dependency class that can be bought and eventually vote for them. How do you know that the war on jihadists/terrorist is 'unwinnable', General Earpeffect?
tacticomp 4 years ago
first of all, i think it is unwinnable with our current strategy. what is our intended goal? is it to kill every terrorist in the world? because that is impossible and that is why president bush has a blank check to keep on fighting this war, and if everybody thought like him, it would never end. i mean whats next, iran? they have terrorists too. my point is that there is no defined goal and he will just keep running with it and taking away OUR freedoms in the process.
earpeffect 4 years ago
You seem to have no grasp of history at all. From the Munich Olympics massacre, US Embassy hostage taking in Iran, to the Al Fatah/PLO murders of innocent people at airports, I could go on and on of these Barbarians' goal to annihilate us and impose their medieval religion on our throats and achieve their caliphate state--open your eyes and see the consequential times we live in--somebody has to do it, and Bush stepped into the plate.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Exactly what Freedom did you lose, Earpeffect?
tacticomp 4 years ago
ok just forget about what i said. you are obviously more knowledgable about the facts. i know when to admit defeat. nobody has ever explained it like that. im 20 and to be honest i never really gave a fuck about politics but recently i have become extremely interested. you have many good points and both the news and you tube are pretty one-sided, one way or the other.
earpeffect 4 years ago
but the most obvious thing i noticed coming in was all of bush's lies: no wmd's, no osama, he called it mission accomplished right after we invaded iraq and we are still there. other than that there are millions of dollars missing and unnacounted for, 190000 weapons MIA, supposedly he violated the constitution countless times, to be honest everything is so fucked up to me that i dont really know what to believe and that is why im on here debating with people.
earpeffect 4 years ago
Congress just gave Bush his intelligence plan to monitor the enemy's potential terrorist schemes and chatters--so which part of the Constitution specifically, did Mr. Bush violated? Listen to me young man, try to get both sides of the argument, and use your analytical thought process to arrive at the truth, learn true history, and not the revised one that the liberals teaches in public schools.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Do yourself a favor and check into petroldollars.
zoticus1 4 years ago
And your point is.....
tacticomp 4 years ago
so since you know the facts so well, tell me general tacticomp, where did the money go? where is the money from the oil? where are these wmd's and are we going after iran next? wasnt the oil money supposed to pay for reconstruction costs? how long can america afford to be in iraq and is that enough time? how many soldiers are you willing to sacrifice for this cause? and most importantly, would YOU be willing to fight for mr. bush??
earpeffect 4 years ago
Eardeffect, The epitome of a clueless simplistic leftist moonbat, who sucks up Daily Kos et al talking points and Demoncrats soundbites without analytical thinking.
UN resolution 1441 was the mission bonehead (do your own reading)and that was accomplished. And just like the post WW2 'Marshall Plan', nation building takes time. You leftists protested that it was all 'Blood for Oil', now that you found out that we're not getting any share of it, you want a piece of their oil profits. So which it?
tacticomp 4 years ago
Iraq's oil revenue was averaging 97Billion/yr, being provincially distributed by the central gov't. Iraq's parliament is drafting a bill to repay the war's costs, (again do your own reading). We live in consequential times, there are insane fundamentalist fanatics who wants to annihilate us and shove their medieval religion down our throats. Sacrifices is essential for our survival. WW2 had 405,000 casualties just to preserve your freedom and your right to be as stupid.
tacticomp 4 years ago
IAM currently fighting for the country. Fighting its domestic enemies that comprises the leftist, liberal, socialist, Stalinist loonies like you, who wants to destroy this country.
Since you're 20, why don't you make the sacrifice and serve our country, get out of your parent's home, get a life, instead of sitting in front of a computer all day.
tacticomp 4 years ago
You should be fighting to stop the corruption of the righ wing agenda. That's what you should be fighting for. Larry Craig just another one that has been outted for being a hypocrite.
jiliannca 4 years ago
Funny you mentioned 'corruption', Jilianca. Hillary was just caught accepting illegal campaign donations from a fugitive Chinese businessman, Norman Shui, who was flagrantly violating Campaign finance reform by funneling campaign funds thru pawns, like a Chinese family with an annual income of 45k/yr but donated 230,000 to Hillary. So before You throw stones, try looking at your Demoncrat backyard trash, instead of engaging in liberal demagoguery, so you wouldn't end up as the bigger hypocrite.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Since we're on the topic of corruption, Jiliannca. Demoncrat congressman William Jefferson (La) is under criminal indictment for bribery and was caught red handed with $90,000 bribe money (10,000 was spent) in his freezer; Bill Clinton (remember him?) pardoned 140 people in exchange for 'donations' (100k minimum) using his brother, Hillary, her brother as 'brokers'
They also truned the lincoln bedroom into 'motel 6' for campaign donations.
tacticomp 4 years ago
I could go on and on, on the long list of corruptions the Liberal Demoncrats have (and are) engaged in, way much longer than the Republicans. And when Republicans get into a scandal, fellow Republicans are principled enough to rebuke their fellow reps--while the Demoncrats abet the act, circle their wagons and vilify their accusers with the politics of personal destruction.
tacticomp 4 years ago
The difference is the republicans act as if they walk on water. Then they prove they aren't so perfect. That's the difference. As far as Hillary accepting a dontation . ANYONE can make a donation to any party. Everyone can't be investigated each time they make a donation. Keep it REAL!
jiliannca 4 years ago
Okey I'll "keep it real"
If you're earning $45,000 a year, like Mr Paw, a letter carrier, and never donated to any campaign or candidate before and then you suddenly made a contribution of $230,000 to a candidate (Hillary)--you just raised a red flag and should be looked into. Imagine if this is a Republican presidential candidate--I'll bet you'll be the first in line to ask for an investigation and the elite liberal media will be all over it.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Here's another 'differrence' between the two parties: When a Demoncrat get into a scandal, other Demoncrats will circle the wagon, abet and defend the scandal, vilify the accusers with the politics of personal destruction and even promote the accused to a higher position--just like senator Gerry Studd (D) who had many sexual relations with a congressional page. While Republicans are principled enough to castigate and distance themselves from the scandal and the accused.
tacticomp 4 years ago
The point is that Republican's vote against rights for gays, lesbians and transexuals but then they end up being just THAT. Yes, "RED FLAGGED" contribution should be investigated. Anyone can make a contrubution is my point.
jiliannca 4 years ago
What are you going to do when transexuals such as myself MAKE the religious right decide if we are men or women? We will walk in front of the capital with no shirts on. At that point they will arrest us for indecent exposure. Then when they do they will learn that according to their own standards, we are men they will have to allow us to do that. OR allow us to marry, it's their choice. Either we walk around topless like other men or they allow us to marry. Now that's gonna be funny.
jiliannca 4 years ago
If the government sees us as gay men, then we should be able to walk around topless like other men. If they see us as women, we should be able to marry the man we love.
jiliannca 4 years ago
But the problem is, you're NOT a woman as originally created by God, Jiliannca. So you cannot force individuals or the government, (run by individuals) to look at you otherwise, just because you think you're a woman. To force your minority 'belief' and impose it on the majority, to change established norms and institutions of society just because you feel that way is just not right.
tacticomp 4 years ago
Nobody, not even the 'religious right' is making you decide if you're going to be a man or a woman, jiliannca. YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING THAT DECISION and you are imposing that decision on the rest of society by your militant views. And making us choose from the proverbial 'lesser of the two evil' choices you've presented--and to me that's funny because no thinking individual will be force into a corner to choose between the two.
tacticomp 4 years ago
I'm not asking them to tell me if I'm a man or a woman. I'm telling them that they can't have it both ways. I'm giving them the option. I'll walk around topless with my 38c's for everyone to see or they can allow me to marry my man. It's up to them.
jiliannca 4 years ago
Jiliannca, Republicans, DO NOT vote against the rights of any individual--they are voting against the extreme gay militant's agenda of tearing down and destroying society's sacrosanct institution of marriage, which has sustain humanity and procreation for thousands of years.
tacticomp 4 years ago
I have been going thru media matters, and I have to admit that's way to far left for my taste. I actually disagree with about 1/2 of the points (too naive)they are trying to make. However they do have direct links to un-edited reports that are valid.
krammitAll 4 years ago
O'Reilly confused on elementary economics. O'Reilly told a caller on his radio show, "We [the United States] have a trade deficit with everybody, because everybody wants our stuff, and we're not wild about snails" -- indicating that he doesn't know the definition of "trade deficit" and implying that the United States runs a trade surplus with France. In fact, in the first four months of 2004, the United States had a $3 billion trade deficit with France. (6/10/04)
krammitAll 4 years ago
O'Reilly doctored quotation to suggest Soros wished his own father dead. During his smear campaign against progressive financier, philanthropist, and political activist George Soros, O'Reilly doctored a 1995 quotation by Soros to make it seem as if Soros wished his own father dead. (6/1/04)
krammitAll 4 years ago
sure, when O'REALLY LIED HIS ASS OFF ABOUT THE EVENTS AT MALMADY? shut the fuck up
tedbohne 4 years ago
I don't usually denigrade the lousy grammar of other posters-- but this is ridiculous. Please use your grammar and spelling checker. But I digress.
Let's hear the alleged lies and cover ups that O'Reily is guilty of.
Combat45 4 years ago
oh this is going to be fun. Where should I start. This may take all day with the limited posting allowed. O'Reilly falsely claimed Bush didn't oppose 9-11 Commission. O'Reilly defended President George W. Bush from a Kerry-Edwards '04 TV ad highlighting Bush's opposition to creation of the 9-11 Commission by denying that Bush had ever opposed the commission. In fact, Bush did oppose the creation of the 9-11 Commission. (10/21/04)
krammitAll 4 years ago
O'Reilly fabricated "Paris Business Review" as source for success of French boycott. O'Reilly falsely claimed "they've lost billions of dollars in France according to 'The Paris Business Review'" due to an American boycott he advocated of French imports. Media Matters for America found no evidence of a publication named "The Paris Business Review." (4/27/04)
krammitAll 4 years ago
Aha! I knew it! 'Media Matters'! This is like the communist manifesto of the left--the 'opinion farm' of the mind numb robots leftist moonbats to form their opinions, simply because of their inability to think for themselves. They can't even explain the rhetorics and the demagoguery found there.
Combat45 4 years ago
O'Reilly disparaged Democrats with trifecta of voter falsehoods. In a discussion about what went wrong for Democrats in the November 2 election, O'Reilly claimed that Democrats "lost votes from four years ago"; that "18- to 24[-year-old]s didn't go" to the polls; and that "[c]ommitted Republicans didn't carry the day for the president; independents did." All three claims are false. (11/4/04)
krammitAll 4 years ago
O'Reilly on the radio: Three lies, one broadcast. Lie No. 1: Bush tax cuts didn't create the budget deficit. Lie No. 2: "Socialistic" French, Germans, and Canadian governments tax at 80 percent. Lie No. 3: Canadian, British, and French media are "government-controlled," but Italian media is free. (7/7/04)
krammitAll 4 years ago
These demagogouery just proves my thesis that Leftwing moonbats like Kramm-itASS doesn't think for themselves. This was obviously lifted from leftists, liberal blogs like 'Media Matters' or 'Daily Kos'. Claims that Useful Idiots like Krammit 'crams' into their empty heads, use as their 'talking points without question, and suck it up as truths. Let's tackle no.1, why do you think that the tax relief caused the deficit?
Combat45 4 years ago
funny how you just floated over all the other points... Picking and choosing your battles? I.e. I can't argue fully the tax issue, and neither can you. But o'lielly just stated it as a fact. "Bush tax cuts didn't create the budget deficit". No one can say either way, but o'lielly seems to think he can!
krammitAll 4 years ago
Equating a commentator (O'Reily) to a News anchor (Dan Rather), shows your ignorance and lack of analytical thinking, Kramm-itASS. While one is to supposed to deliver the news, the other is to comment on it. Rather's video package docu was the supposed 'missing (Nat. Guard) 6 months' of Bush's services, (which he produced faked documents) and not the scope of his guard service as you foolishly assert.
Combat45 4 years ago
Since you live in a socialist (pattern) country, (where "free health care" is not really 'free'-- the working class pays for it), tally how much you're paying in sales, gas, groceries, services, local, state, property, social security, and income taxes? Everything you do is taxed and here in the US, will come up to a total of 47 to 50+ to a dollar earned, depending on your bracket. So the more entitlements programs the government implement, the more taxes it impose to pay for these 'freebies.
Combat45 4 years ago
well we don't pay state, or social security.. that's your country. Who cares if our tax base is higher, but if that gives us health care, better education, respect on the world stage, higher standard of living, budget surplus, lower crime... etc. What about the fact that the mast majority of your income tax goes to paying interest on the national debt? At least our tax isn't wasted.
krammitAll 4 years ago
If the average US taxpayer is paying almost half of every dollar earned, and taking six months (May) to complete their tax obligations. What more of France, Germany, Canada and other Socialist countries, whose entitlements (freebies) programs are up to the roof. Chances are, they are paying 60,70,80% tax burden. O'Reily's assessment might be exagerated, but could be closely accurate by going for the highest possible scenario.
Combat45 4 years ago
See, you just admitted that you Canadians are paying your taxes through the roof (and paying for somebody's welfare entitlements). And it looks like you don't mind playing the 'Peter' to pay for Paul's needs. This class envy and class warfare seems to work well on people like you-- Leftist Liberals. "Give man a bread and he will eat for one day, teach him how to fish, and he can eat for the rest of his life."
Combat45 4 years ago
BTW I now have you to thank regarding media matters. I actually never visited them until I had to research o'lielly lies. It's funny that no sites go into rebutting these points. I have spent about 20 minutes on media matters and have found several 3rd party non partisan reports. Where are yours? I know now why you were slamming it. Your just another scared of the truth righty.
krammitAll 4 years ago
You went overboard in taking my (google) advice and did a hell of a 'cut & paste' plagiarism to establish your 'opinion' and 'crammit' (pun intended) all in here. We're not impressed, Kramm-itASS.
Your naiveted is also laughable, believing that an ultra leftwing blog like 'Media Matters' will link a 'non partisan' link to their website.
Combat45 4 years ago
My first reaction after seeing your 'cut and paste' opinions, is that they were obviously lifted from some blog. And when you finally cited MMatters as your 'source', your credibility (or what's left of it)just went down the drain, Kramm-itASS. Admitting that you don't know much about taxes and yet injecting your lifted false opinions about it, is not smart. Try studying GDP, Revenues, Deficit and national debt before mouthing off and playing a psuedo-intellectual.
Combat45 4 years ago
Al Gore never said this dickhead
tedbohne 4 years ago
Fox doesn't present news you fuckwad. You should be KILLED for writing this kind of shit!!
tedbohne 4 years ago
tadbohnehead hates FOXNEWS so much, I can bet that he never watch it. He's the epitome of left's blind hatred for those who expose their liberal lunacy, that they are transformed into a manaical schizoids, willing to kill the truth messengers.
tacticomp 4 years ago
How could you be a FOXNEWS expert, you don't even watch, KrammitASS. More than likely, you've seen a snipet of a show or news program, or lift up some leftist blog talking points ( I know, I've come accross your opinion before in some leftist moonbat blog) And now you're speaking like the all knowing Al Gore who pontificate and lecture us with dubious 'facts' and fake science.
Combat45 4 years ago
Ok... this must be the babbling part. Now your a psychic? Oh wait it's starting to make sense... your on a meth binge.
krammitAll 4 years ago
No wonder you're clueless on what the true situation in the mainstream media. Your're being Canadian is surely a factor, (for Celine Dion is the 'best' Canada can offer). Secondly, You're waiting for an 'independent' studies to do show you the obvious.
I guess if you psyche believes that FOX is 'biased', then you must be really DUMB and has a screwed analytical thought process. (not surprising among Liberals)
Combat45 4 years ago
So your admitting you have no proof, and your argument is based on "faith" in theses matters. Ok.. now your off topic again. What's the matter am I getting to close to the facts. You should make sure you can back up your statements before you post.
krammitAll 4 years ago