Added: 2 years ago
From: pork7777
Views: 50,991
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (279)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Poor frontal armour, the turret has inverted armour at the bottom of the turret that matches up with the hull, instead of deflecting a round up and away, it will accomodate a round right inbetween the hull and turret killing the crew, poor design.

  • tank cùi mía chạy cai nọng gật gật bắng chim còn ko trúng lấy gì bắng ngươi ta trời.vậy mà dám xưng là ông vua.cái này ném về ông vua mù.

  • T-80 with a flat turret.

  • If China is so strong militarily as some say why not regained control of Taiwan by the Chinese government classified as a renegade province?

    Even with all the advantages the Chinese fear of American reaction that would end the corrupt Communist Chinese, liberate the people from oppression as in Libya!

  • @jonathanporto9, hahaha you are stupid hahahahaha

    Do you know what happened in WWII?

    Japan took over Manchuria, ok give them Machuria, Germany the divided German State, and Italy took Greece, is ok let them have what they want, and because the Allies let them take what they want GERMANY, JAPAN, AND ITALY were strong enough to start wwii

    Same with Cold War Russian to expand communism, Allies policy against communist was not let them spread

  • @jonathanporto9, You just cannot invade a country now, and think that the whole world will not join force together against you

    Hussein tried to invade South Arabia, and everyone went against him.

    I admit that U.S. army is way too advance, but as China is fear from U.S., U.S. is also fear of China.

  • @jonathanporto9 No country can defeat Amrican

  • @chinakickyourass

    Since when? :D

  • 樂中國 友誼長存

  • @shahzadazulfiqar1 Long live Pakistan-China brotherhood.

  • these tanks were destroyed by U.S. Army tanks that are superior!

  • @jonathanporto9, hello WWII. Tiger-Panzer ate inferior American Sherman tanks.

    China is a raising power, as was US in the WWI just is a matter of time until China have the same technology level as U.S.

  • @wolfofstorm time? who knows maybe in a few centuries!hahahahahaha

  • @jonathanporto9, hahaha you so stupid, hahaha

    

  • @wolfofstorm ha ha ha you too ha ha ha ha !!!

  • hahahaha same exact video for new russian tanks .....funny stuff

  • Made in China

  • I guess the chicoms stole enough American tech or did Bill and Hillary give it to them. Either way its still another cheap p.o.s that really dedicated sloped commies can burn to death in

  • Comment removed

  • well it probably can't penetrate a challenger 2 tank since it does have the best armour in the world

  • this is true but the main factors are that i know as well as the people i know have served are the most professional and most experienced in the field of heavy guns and also due to the fact that it does not matter the late model or not you can still test fire rounds from modern weaponry at an abrams and have no effect which i would consider to be the biggest factors you would think by making and allogating such things towards a tank that it will deliver

  • @nickdavis281 There are reports (or may be rumors) saying that the main gun of Type 99G and the latest T-90 of does have the power to penetration power to destroy the frontal armor of an M1A2, and that's why an additional depleted uranium layer will be used in M1A3...basically I just want to say that Abrams is an excellent tank, but,like everything else, not invincible.

  • @LXHFIRENKING The T-90 has enough power to penetrate an Abrams in front. Its close range weapon consists of Tungsten tipped warheads, which is extremely powerful, Russia abandoned cheaper DU warheads for a reason. Its not adviceable to even go near a T-90 since it fields TCHEAT warheads too. It also has almost twice the range of the Abrams. The T-95 will be using a 152mm gun, making any modern armor obsolete

  • its fact that that never has an abrams tank been lost in battle so you lil dick chinise guys can quit talkin shit cause when it comes down to it record speak louder than words

  • @nickdavis281 Nvr in a tank vs tank battle, but that's partly because Abrams have nvr fight a tank of the same generation as Abrams. The T-72 that Iraqis had were simplified export versions with primitive fire control, thinned armor, and only steel-core AP rounds....but Abrams did suffer losses from road-side bombs in Iraq. The problem with Chinese tanks is that they've nvr had any battle commission.

  • copy in china is a public culture,because is very easy get the point

  • boy you guys sure like some chinese cock!!\

  • Chinese invented gun powder/rockets/rifles/rocket launchers/cannons/grenades/min­es/bombs. The westerners copied & reverse-engineered everything and a whole bunch of other technologies/inventions then produced their own. That is ok to do...Now that China is rising and started doing what the Americans did...it is not ok....WTF? Besides, China didn't copy all the military techs, some are their own, some are adapted/borrowed which EVERY COUNTRY DOES IT. Stop being such hypocritical douche bags.

  • Made In China tanks, hehe they must be reliable.

  • @Hobby331 actually yes, not everything china makes is bad, I mean hell half the electrionics that people think are Japanese or American that we love are in fact produced in China.

  • made in china

  • fucking china tank

  • and fuck you~@hungrose2k

  • @hungrose2k another day, another vietnamese have to spread hatred to another country. not joking that vietnamese are never tired of war. finish fighting america, china, and some neighbour country. now they want to rage war against china again. a vietnamese like u should not be existed, u r like many retarded childish internet user who never consider the cause and effect of ur ignorant and racisit message. if u have no life, then get a life, go outside and socialize.

  • @jack99889988

    Hey mate, this hungrose2k is just one of those poor viets who got affected by agent orange, so his brain is most likely busted. he's too poor to gain access to medications, so he's completely jealous of the china which is becoming richer and stronger. Let's face it, vietnam is only jealous of Chinese status of 2nd largest economy, fastest developing, and having stronger and better equipped military than them. after all, viet is just poor shit. can't beat indonesia or singapore.

  • @hungrose2k Why the hell in the world would you be fucking a tank? My goodness boy, get a grip! Go get laid! ...Oh wait....that's right...LOLOLOL... owned- gg no re boy~

  • @TheJag005 You have much to learn then, about a great many things.

    Why is it you Yank's never do anything other than speak ill of other Countries?

    (1st the Japanese, then the Russians, now the Chinese, who will you lot be spouting hatrid at next i wonder?).

    Take some advice from your forrner Mother Country: Learn to

    "Treat others only as you would want to be treated" (as Arrogance & Ignorance will only be the US's undoing, just like it was for the Romans & their infamous "Barbarian Complex").

  • China tank?you guy should know how is the quality made in China ,pieces of craps,can't compare to M 1

  • @TheJag005

    Ur just blinded by ur racist views which looks down on chinese. where's most stuff made in? China! buddy. Chinese suppliers makes goods depending on how much u pay. pay them high for the goods, then out comes high quality products, if not then, u get shit! U think china with their 2nd largest military budget in the world can't afford to develop good weapons? Who do u think invent anti carrier missiles that flies at mach 10 speed which made US end their naval supremacy? The Chinese!

  • @TheJag005

    Here's to make my explaination simpler. having money=better ability to develop good weapons. U think chinese can't afford it? Then I suggest u go do more study and research mate. If u think made in china sucks, then dump all the gadgets, clothing, computers, and etc that says made in china on them. thank them for giving us affordable things, not hate them mate. Ur just purely racist to not accept asians are on the rise, while the era of west is ending.

  • its just made in china

  • China are imitating tanks from the western or from Russia....these are not originals because "Made in China" are fake materials

  • @bing476 lol what a noob, material is material, its an object, there is no such thing called fake 'material', unless you chicken hean 'invented' it`

  • Comment removed

  • @bing476 trust me nothing in this world is original... other than our sun lol.

  • @AndroidGZS not even our sun is original. There are more than billions of stars in this universe. the only thing original is our universe,, welll as we can only conclude so far.

  • @AndroidGZS well you know, im just saying

  • Glad that Russia and China are allies.....

  • i am enough of all your "copy" "copy" comments, stop copying others' "copies" because u need to invent your own god damn comments if u want to continue to insult another country, your copycats!

  • Watch out protesters.... coming to a town square near you

  • copy from t72 tank and some tanks in other countries. fuck china for bad behaviour.

  • I have 2 eyes. How many you have? If you have 2, you are totally copy from me. ****for bad behaviour.

  • Comment removed

  • China can copy all they want but without true battle experience they are just 8 yr olds with a big mouth. Essentially, is really comes down to who hits who first in a tank battle. Well you also have to make a precise hit also. US already has been outfitting tanks with extremely long range guidance shells, and there not your typical shells. they are highly engineered efficient shells.

  • @JuegoMaestro The intended opponent probably isn't even the west. It's likely T90s used by India or some japanese knockoff of a leapard.

  • Russian/Chinese tank chassis is excellent, tehy just need to copy the T-84 Yatagan 120 turret.

  • Its like a T-90, M1 Abrams, and Leo all rolled into one. I would still bet the Abrams would eat this thing alive though. Especially with our reactive armor and highly trained crews and Blitz style tactics. I would say the Russians should be worried. If these things have better quality then Russian built arms (which wouldn't be hard) they may lose a significant share of their international market.

  • Great Video, about what i consider a front line MBT with a lot of Promise.

  • @Hitch31326 Can't say they (the Chinese) have.

    If they had copied anyone (which they haven't) they'd have copied the German or British MBT's, of the time ( "Leopard 2A4" & "Challenger 1" ) not some US derivative of them (the ""M1A2"" uses a Shortened version of the Leopard 2's Gun, & British Composite Armour [Chobram]).

    So i ask you... who's coping who? ; )

  • Fucking China.Lũ khốn.

  • dit me bon china

  • 目前没有一种坦克可以抵挡javalin的攻顶攻击。

  • 陆地巡洋舰!我喜欢!

  • If aliens ever crashed and you wanted to reverse engineer it; send it to china. They are pros at copying stuff...

  • @PirateMcSandwich

    How do you know that we don't have one~!? LOL

    anyway EVERYBODY do reverse engineering and especially Americans, you can do it or invent it doesn't necessary means that others cannot! don't forget who invented the paper that you are using today, or should the Chinese start charging you fees for using their technologies that were invented thousand years ago?

  • @igorigo how is paper a technology. That's like to drink water from a river using a cup. I guess that's a technology. Oh you must mean the process in how to make paper. I really don't think we chew pieces of bamboo. Besides the west made their paper from wood, china made it from bamboo. they are too different types of materials. If you consider the concept to be the same, then carving in stone is the same also, and the rest of world figured that out before you did... or maybe at the same time.

  • I thought i'd share a little more here. Take Persian gulf for example. 4500 Iraqi tanks vs 3500 US M1 abrams. That one battle, iraq lost 3,800 tanks with only 4 US tanks lost. Now the iraqi tanks were not all that bad, sure they were a bit outdated but the discreptancy wouldn't be that large. I would say it was more of an experience factor. Sure they had no chance to begin with but they probably could of had a better ratio in that fight. This battle is what shocked China.

  • @JuegoMaestro

    The iraqi tanks were very bad, just as their crew. They had downgraded export versions of T-72. A tanks that was designed as a mass produced tank and was outdated to begin with. Ad downgraded capabilities compared to the actual soviet tank and bad tank commanders. Put them against a high quality tanks with well trained crews and those results is what you get

  • @Terrorkarel Yah sure, but These downgraded t-72s were better than Chinas MBTs during the Gulf war. Thats Why they Even developed this Thing. And they only have about 500 of These... USA has about 7000 M1 Abrams tanks. The Best Tank in the World is still Leopard 2A7+, it can take this Thing out from 2 km Away While its moving and itself is moving with Full Speed over Rough Terrain.^^ well, Let's just hope we Never get to test it out^^

  • @GhostRider659

    Our army will never find out how good they are because they have disbanded the cavalry. Soon we will no longer have Leopards 2. Stupid budged cuts.

  • And I am not even sure why China is paranoid. US won't attack china unless they attack someone else and even then they won't invade them. There is no point, unless they house terrorists but terrorists house in weak countries. So that's good for China. And people should think west hates China. Chinese people themselves admit they copy but that's normal for a weak country. Chinese people are great people, its the Chinese government you more worry about. Sad, the people have no control. No pride.

  • @igorigo well inventing it is always harder than coping it from someone else and letting them do all the hard R&D work. so you are right reverse engineering is the name of the game. for example china's purchase from the taliban of two unexploded Tomahawk land attack missiles and now China's new DF-21 carrier killing missile does strike a resemblance to the Tomahawk crusie missile.

  • @Rimasta1 You just show your ignorance...Tomahawk is a cruise missile, DF-21 is a ballistic missile...which has absolutely nothing similar to tomahawk...you have to admit that no body in this whole world except the Chinese has built ballistic missile to fight carriers

  • @igorigo yes, I hear Metallica in the soundtrack for this video. Oh, sorry this is reverse engineered melody. Or maybe they also invented it centuries ago like the paper?

  • @PirateMcSandwich 2/10 for effort

  • @DemeterHUN when you kid around on the internet, its hard for people to tell if your kidding or not.

  • looks like someone copied the Abrams.

  • @Hitch31326 yeah it was the americans and named it abrams after they copied it. you moron haha

  • @DemeterHUN oh really? The Abrams entered service in 1980, and had been devoloped during the cold war.

    While the T-99 on the other hand wasn't in devolopement until the 1990s, and wasn't officially adopted by the chinese army until the year 2001. Educate yourself idiot.

  • @Hitch31326 i was joking you retarded moron, stfu and leave the internet forever idiot

  • looks like someone copied the Abrams.

  • anyone know the weight of this thing?

  • @joeythekangaroo92 51tons

  • die meisten Bilder in dem Film sind mit Modellen aufgenommen (z.B. 2:13 )... das ist doch lächerlich... OMG

    ausserdem fährt der tank ständig mit angehobener Kanone herum... was soll das?...besitzt dieser angeblich beste Panzer der Welt etwa keine stabilisierte Kanone? der würde auf dem Schlachtfeld gegen die modernen westlichen Panzer doch keine Minute überleben.

    Fazit: solche Panzer hat man in den 40ger Jahren gebaut - HEUTE SCHROT!

    (meine Meinung)

  • 美国权威军事杂志,评99式是世界最先进,火力最强大的坦克!!­!!

  • @TWpig 经过我的军事鉴定 我做的纸飞机全球最强~!

  • @qq75970138 經過我的鑑定 你娘的陰道很大

    嘻嘻嘻~~

  • @w570102 经过我的鉴定 你是狗娘养的

  • @qq75970138 經過我的鑑定 你也是我射到你娘陰道裡面的精液之一

    AY~~

  • @w570102 经过我的鉴定 你妈和你两条狗是杂交而成的

  • @qq75970138 經過我的鑑定 你是自己從你媽那裏走出來的~

  • @w570102 经过我的鉴定 你妈这条狗是吃屎长大的

  • @qq75970138 哈哈哈~~ 好了嗎? 兄弟可以停戰了嗎?

    不然再這樣下去的話!我倆不知要鑑定到何時呀!

    另外!我也不是針對你!

  • @w570102 你这台湾死贱种滚一边去好不好,狗一样的东西,一天到晚狂吠有用­吗?你还不是条狗?

  • @TWpig 我的老二最喜歡滾進你娘的穴穴裡了 ~ 嘻嘻 ~

    幹你娘賤豬 !

  • 好 cool 呀!

  • 这个好像排进了世界前十,唯一缺点就是一旦被摧毁就会逃不出来,­但是他上面有多用途激光武器,可以致盲,摧毁来袭导弹的引导头,­他的装甲最NB了,测试的时候不用反应装甲就轻松抵抗住了标枪导­弹只掉了一个烟雾发射筒

  • @qiyuxuan9437 好 cool 呀!

  • @qiyuxuan9437 我还没见过呗导弹摧毁的 还能活着出来的!!!

  • @qiyuxuan9437

    我不信, 吹牛逼吧, 标枪的威力太大了,个头也大

  • @qiyuxuan9437 这个真不好说,标枪可以攻顶。不过99A2排进全球前三问题不大­,因为总师都曾放话保守算是前三,何况99A2还有大量改进,

  • 有些人只是讨口上的一时之快而已。骂来骂去何用?有意思吗?

  • ridiculous

  • hope one day can be used to get our island back!!

  • @yzy010858 "Your" island. Ha!

  • Number1

  • 愛國第一步,不買日美貨

  • China tank equals number one

  • WE HAVE A BIG PLANS ,CHINA WILL GROW LARGER,NOTHING IN OUR WAY,

  • Great tank! I can not wait to see T-90A and Type-99 on excersises together soon!))))

  • @bittemeinrammstein I remember they have already done an exercise back in 2008...

  • 它的激光壓制預先瞄射與自動追瞄和非人工火控發射

    抗重導彈射擊與車身低生存率高動力噸位比強大

    都已經顯示這台幾無對手坦克的不凡之處

    若能結合C4ISR衛星智慧數位統合(SGGGI)將效果加乘將­更佳

    對於胡言亂語最好要韜光養晦讓國外不知道的人去瞎猜

    祝榆生老將軍66-92都投注心力在此

    想到其他錢學森錢三強陳庚老先生殲七機殲十DF-31的工程師

    中國的前一代不凡的知識分子熱愛國家矢志追求而不惜血汗生命

    終能研發出頂尖一項項武器克敵制勝

    真情令人尊敬

  • @h5041263 99式坦克的总设计师祝榆生的经历很传奇,我想他今天应该是很欣­慰的。参加抗战,亲身经历过抗日战场上武器不如人那种境况,更会­为自己今日设计出世界最顶尖的坦克而由衷自豪

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • 奇怪,每次有有关中国的视频,就会有一堆日本矮子Japanes­e dwarf 跳出来骂来骂去,NND不嫌累啊,吃屎去吧。

  • It's an extremely fast and mobile tank. A+

  • @SOVIETasTheINVADER 真是傻逼会说的话。

  • China is only a regional military power. It cannot project global power like the US. Any tank China has can be smashed by something the US has. Abrams tank will probably be last tank

    US builds because tanks are becoming outdated and whoever controls space will ultimately

    prevail in war.

  • 中共糞豚劣化戦車

  • @SOVIETasTheINVADER lol..........倭寇

  • man that is very much "do not f##k with me" .. Chinese have some wicked kit for sure

    let us hope we never have to face them again .. and who could blame them I'd be pissed to if a bunch of lads got to my border and threaten my beer supply lol ..

  • 中国99式偽詐欺戦車

  • @Kawanya37  台湾狗?

  • @TWpig Yes,CCP is a dog.

  • @Kawanya37 被人奴役的杂种竟然骂别人是狗?你也配?

  • @TWpig  智障吃屎狗 馬的

    嘴砲殺小 淦吃屎長大的蠢狗 滿腦袋裝屎 真下濺

  • @sfak10046  你不是台湾狗吗?

  • @TWpig 你不是狗跟蚯蚓雜交的屎廢種嗎?

  • @sfak10046  我是驯化你们这群杂种的!!!

  • @TWpig 白痴白痴白痴  呿!真腦包

  • @sfak10046  你敢说你是狗杂种?

  • @TWpig  我敢說你是狗屎幹出來的垃圾渣

  • 紅色豚戦車

  • @SOVIETasTheINVADER

    Fucking imperilist Jap. Don't forget your country is the only one that was nuked in WW2!!! ^_____^

  • @maomao667

    Let me ask you a question. Do you hate Japanese or Americans more? Don't

    forget, Mao Mao, US saved China's ass against Japs in WW2.

  • @cabraden1

    I don't hate American and Japanese people, I hate the fucking US government and biased western medias!!! They should stop being a big bully!!!

  • @maomao667 紅色糞豚戦車

  • @Kawanya37

    Stop barking like a mad dog, you stupid shithead. hahahaha

  • @maomao667 中華糞禿戦車

  • @Kawanya37

    ┌∩┐(^_^)┌∩┐

  • @Kawanya37  日本国王还要我们把它从美国人胯下救出,不过看来你是已经在美国­人胯下安心的住下了!!!

  • where's the chinese mammoth tank?

  • awesome stuff in the hands of oppressors

  • @tyuru2

    This tank can blow yanks ass off. ^ ^

  • @maomao667

    You wish.

  • @cabraden1

    This can be true if US troops dare to invade China. They will get their asses blowed off by this tank !!!

  • @maomao667

    US wouldn't invade China, but believe me, the US military is more than capable of smashing your tanks with its tank killers. The US spends 10 times as much on its R&D and military hardware than China, and US hardware is far better. Don't underestimate the US, and the US won't underestimate China. That's

    the worse thing a country can do. The US made Abrams M1A1 tank technology

    goes back to the mid 70s, yet it is still far superior than the Chinese Type 99

    tank.

  • @cabraden1

    US M1A1 is no matched with Chinese type 99 tank.

  • @maomao667

    You don't know this. These tanks have never gone toe to toe. Depleted uranium

    round will easily penetrate China's best armor. Pound for pound, the US Abrams

    is the best, Read up. Anyway, tanks are becoming quickly outdated, no matter

    how high tech they are. US Abrams is battle tested; Chinese Type 99 isn't.

  • @cabraden1

    The armor of Chinese type99 is not that bad as you thought. And I am sure type99 tanks will be used in battle one day. =)

  • @maomao667

    Right, it is a pretty good tank, but far from being in the group of the best. The US,

    Britain and Germany have best tanks in the world.

  • @cabraden1

    Even though US military is still the No.1, you can not deny the fact that China's military technology is getting much better than before. They no longer fight with soliders waves. The modernization of Chinese military can not stoped !

  • @cabraden1 do you american shit heads know why the abrams is a good tank cause your all fan boys yeah abrams shit tested on outdated un maintaned soviet tanks in the middle east even a sherman can take out dumb ass american lol

  • @hyperidiot34

    Abrams tank was first battle tested in First Gulf War. It wasted about 3,000 Soviet built tanks that Iraqi Republican Guard had. The Abrams tank's tech go back almost 35 years, yet it is still superior to China's best tank. Go figure.

  • @cabraden1 thats my point the abrams was only tested on outdated tanks like here for example the type99 blew up that t34 cause it was old same thing goes for the abrams it took out thousands of OLD SOVIET TANKS cause they were old the type 99 or even a SHERMAN WW2 TANK can wreck those things and im sure the type 99 can WRECK MORE SOVIET TANKS THAN THE ABRAMS CAUSE ABRAMS AND AMERICA SUCKS BALLS

  • @cabraden1 Arams never fought against modern Chinese tanks so there is nothing to figure. In regards to whoever controls space is the key to winning, I agree. However China already has their own sets up sats up there, they also have anti sat weapons and is building a space station soon. They are landing their first carrier into the sea next year and planning to build more. US can project their power globally yes, however most of the time the carriers are idling racking up on maintainance cost.

  • the tanks shown at 2:40 are actually Type 96Gs with the upgraded armour package, not Type 99.

  • This is the T-72

  • @3a4ucTkaToMck no dis is not.omg..china didnt copy everything from russia.lol..

  • Go China Go

  • ima waiting for T05 main battle tank