Bill C-484: The Unborn Victims of Crime Act

[Grzegoorz76]

im on cam and bored

great vid e9

[SabrinaSilverstien]

You said it girl !

[HeavenstoLucy]

great interview, she made lots of good points.

[FukYoMomma]

The interviewee makes many claims and throws around labels ("anti-women," "anti-choice," etc.), but she does not back up her claims with any substance.

The bill in question does nothing to prohibit or curtail abortion, and this video presented no evidence to the contrary.

This video was a 2:41-long slippery-slope fallacy with lots of labelling and glittering generalities. It was propaganda.

[Marikafan]

Isn't it funny how pro-choicers have so little understanding and compassion for the LOSS a woman goes through when she loses her unborn child to violence.

Saying that the baby she saw on the sonogram was nothing more "than a piece of tissue" really undermines the horror of this crime.

[thunderflash82]

Lol, she says she holds the future generations. I have a question, honestly how many extreme feminists even have kids?

[ThusFar777]

Why is this bill anti-woman? You people need to realize that not all women think like you and one group of women should not have the right or authority to make laws for all women. Most women do not perceive their unborn child to be "one with them". We don't talk to or bond with our ovaries. When we have to bury our pre-born children's bodies we are not burying an amputated limb, we are burying our children.

[ThusFar777]

All these radical feminists need to understand that they do not speak for all women. They can only speak for themselves. This bill excludes any action on the mother's part therefore abortion has nothing to do with bill C-484. A quick read of the bill will make that clear. It is only for when a crime is committed against the woman and a woman choosing to get an abortion is not a crime against her.

[ThusFar777]

Also, this bill is not a domestic violence bill so they shouldn't expect it to cover domestic violence issues.

I find it a little strange how we can fight to protect trees and yet when a mother has to bury her 8-month-old pre-born child the law tells her her child never existed. Making something a separate entity from a woman does not make that thing a "person" with personhood rights. It just says it exists.

[ThusFar777]

Now here's a question...

Why in the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada's poster entitled "How To Think About The Fetus" Joyce Arthur states "the fetus becomes a person when the woman says it does" but yet you people continue to fight against this bill? In this case it is a woman who has chosen to birth her baby and her fetus was taken from her against her will.

[ThusFar777]

This is a violation against her rights and the criminal should be accountable for depriving her of her fetus. A true pro-choicer would respect and protect the choices of all women.

[jessicayee1]

Ronak did a great job with this video!

Just to clarify, I realize I said "standing commission" in reference to the "standing committee" on Human Rights and Justice where the bill is right now.

Also the wording of this bill does not only NOT speak to the actual protection of domestic violence victims, but all victims of violence. Pass a bill that talks about the actual woman!

For more information you can go to the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada's website.

[jessicayee1]

test