Krematorium IIIn this complex, I observed that the building with the furnace room and its ancillary rooms is entirety completed, as is the large corpse cellar 1.
Corpse cellar 2 is completed as far as possible apart from removal of the formwork for the ceiling, work which depends on there being no frost. The 5 3-muffle incineration furnaces are ready and are at present being warmed through for drying. Inspection report of 29/1/43 by Engineer Prüfer of Messrs Topf & Son--Pressac
"Auschwitz commandant denied gassings & murdered for it"
We know this because there is no denial and he died of natural causes. Having died, a full, false, planted confession was considered, but vague ambiguity was felt to be the better option.
Mengele denied "camp conditions" which is why they won't publish his memoirs.
A German magazine had them, historians have seen them and they went on sale in an open auction. These are always the best ways of ensuring nothing gets out.
So, you haven't seen any denials and the buyer wants to publish. Baer could have taken poison and EIchmann denied something you won't post and admitted something else...you won't post.
I'll keep an eye on Reuters. I suspect they'll hear about you any day now.
"Auschwitz "Angel of Death" Josef Mengele's Unknown Writings to be Auctioned
... He also offers his opinions on a myriad of subjects, including race-mixing, the Nuremburg war crimes trials, justification of the concentration camp system, and denial of the conditions at the camps."
We know they contained denials because the PRNewswire states they do.
Once again for the stupid boy: The report on the autopsy for the COD states: "Natural causes ... The ingestion of an odorless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out."
So, Hoess biography is considered hugely important, but Mengele's journals are not. Why is that Tim?
So if a news source says something is so, it is or must be so, is that right, brightness?
More poor man straw man, mate! How do you know the Jew won't publish, I thought Posner saw them, I thought you said it was in there, I thought the journals were not always in Jewish hands!?
So the casue of death was not sinister and could equally be suicide, is that fair?
(look straw-man up Tim, you're really making a fool of yourself by this constant misuse of the term)
Mengele's journals are suspected to give the full details of his experiment with gypsy twins Tito and Nino. And his method of how he sewed the veins of two individuals together.
That is why they won't allow them to be published - They're too horrifying.
The cause of death was sinister Tim "The ingestion of an odorless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out." is a bit of a clue
LOL! I'm sure you're entitled to an opinion, but frankly, it's you who doesn't know how to construct a reasonable false argument.
What might or might not be in them and an assumption that that unknown content dictates future publishing, or not, is a windowlicker's excuse of a false proposition.
So it's obvious to you is it Tim, that Baer committed suicide?
Do you think there is a Nazi base on the far side of the Moon as well?
As far as I am aware, Occupied Germany has never been in possession of the Mengele diaries. And if they had been, and they had read the denials they evidently contain. The Occupied Germans would have of course burnt the journals along with Germar Rudolf's books that also deny Holocaustiany.
Nice conspiracy theory on Baer you're developing there. How'd he get the poison do you think? Did he keep some Zyklon B crystals up his arse, for old time's sake?
I bet you the Royal County of Berkshire (which I'll have to buy first), that these journals are not published in their entirety before 2020.
Eichmann admitted a lot. Including that he didn't give Hoettl the 6m figure, which you have now finally admitted is true.
They will not published anything *about Auschwitz* from those journals before 2020, not a sausage.
Baer was in a prison when he died Tim. Further inquiry into his death wasn't made. The autopsy report which stated "The ingestion of an odourless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out." did not seem to interest the chief prosecutor.
I'll reword that. Why does that mention of an unknown substance not include the possibility of suicide.
I have no theory, mate. Suicide or otherwise. You're the one making the emphatic claims of items you haven't ever seen. I'm trying to understand why he couldn't have taken something.
Talk of Berkshire, Zyklon and even sausages would be superfluous in these circumstances, mate.
"I feel a great obligation this should be shown to the public," the buyer said.
He said in the right hands the documents can be used as a force for good to counter Holocaust deniers and to reject any philosophy that leads to discrimination."
So lets hope he'll scan them, put them on a pdf and then upload them on the web.
You attempt to displace your responsibility to post these denials by arguing fallaciously that they are there but you, we, everyone in fact, are prevented from seeing them.
"I must have told him the contents of the statistician's report. I must have told him that. I think the comprehensive report ended with a total of five million. That's what I seem to remember."
Tell me how important published interrogations are, bright lad?
These are obviously cogent information, important for the wider picture and a clear view of all evidence gathered, right? Interrogation transcripts contain a wealth of detail and are often the most realistic first opportunity of obtaining lucid and honest recall from these characters, aren't they?
So the latest edition of the windowlicker's guide to hanging on to your credibility is, if someone doesn't admit/confess something....that's a denial?
If Holocaust had taken place there should be concrete evidence of it...instead of arguing over testimonies and 2nd hand evidences one must conduct forensic investigation and analyze the 1st hand evidences; an average human being makes about 1.5 Kg of ash. If we assume at least 4 million out of 6 million wer burnt in the Krema, at least 6 million kgs of human ashes should be there; not to mention extra fuel ashes. some ashes do exist Majdanek etc. investigation is imp. It is pontless to fight.
@criptsmacker Dr. Leon Wells, retired sonderkommando, testified at the Eichmann trial (session 23)
"After grinding the bones WE USED TO THROW THE ASHES UP IN THE AIR SO THAT THEY WOULD DISAPPEAR, replace the earth on the graves and plant seeds, so that nobody could recognize that there ever was a grave there"
I have uncles who fought and died for Grossdeutschland. I met & spoke with Hans Baur in 1983. He vehemently denied the so called "Holocaust"
Do U even know who the Hell HANS BAUR WAS ? ? ? ? . . . (1898-1993).
He was AH's private pilot from 1933 to 1945, was taken prisoner by the USSR and spent 14 yrs in soltary confinement for his high position in the Reich.
This is a classic example of the sub-human mentality of those who hate Germany and its history and who believe every word of propoganda told to them. Thay all have FOUL MOUTHS to match their small brains.
We still find the bones of Dynasaurs that died 70 million ago, but no bones from the 6 million victims of the supposed Holocaust. I guess every last one of them was burnt up in those tiney crematorium? Leaving no physical evidence behind at all. That must have been a lot of work. And all the fuel needed ! And Germany lost the war because it ran out of fuel !
@Avalon400 I don't think the dinosaurs were made extinct by being burnt to ash in crematoria...but I could be wrong there... And scraps of bones do exist its just that they are either buried in hollowed ground which archaeologists do not excavate out of respect or are already in mass graves on sites of their murder. Fuel was not an issue: They had coke fuel, fat produced by burning bodies reduced the overall need for fuel and many camps were in forested areas with tons of wood all around.
One Hundred and Ninety-Seventh Day: Wednesday, 7th August, 1946
"As soon as death taken place in, the ventilators were started. When the air could be breathed again, the doors were opened, and the Jewish workers removed the bodies. By means of a special process which Wirth had invented, they were burned in the open air without the use of fuel." - Konrad Morgen (SS Judge)
And he explained his mention of "without the use of fuel" meant no flammable material at all, or he meant no fuel as in fuel that would otherwise be used to run in an engine. Or is this just an assumption of the former?
Perhaps if you posted a non-sinister alternative or flat denial by an SS operative, another SS investigator, or an SS doctor at these sites, we could take or reject the testimony just as literally.
Morgen was a defend witness was he? Like Hoess? LMAO
See Hitler's Heirs (1961) by Paul Meskil - page 51, for Morgen's claim Oskar Dirlewanger made soap from not just human fat, but from a human and horse fat mix. Nice.
Perhaps if Jews tortured you, and threatened to send your family to a gulag, you'd agree to pretty much anything they want you to.
Perhaps if you stopped blocking people or editing threads and answered the question on the original topic, we'd believe you.
Answer the 'fuel' point raised and then show us who in the camp system SS was tortured? At the minute, the denier line seems to be that the key protagonists were tortured into giving the exact same story through individual testimony which doesn't match anyone else's!!
It's the way with SS confessions, Hoess, Gerstein, Morgen et al
You have to cherry pick their testimony to make a plausible narrative. If you include the ridiculous assertions they all made, their credibility completely falls apart. As does the Holofaux.
"You have to cherry pick their testimony to make a plausible narrative" No shit.
And edit, re-interpret, take out of context and ignore such parts that can also work for you, or not, as the case may be, right?
Morgen was interviewed in 1971 by Toland...
' He refused to testify that Koch made lampshades -- "The Americans almost killed me for it... They threatened three times to turn me over to the Russians or French or Poles and had started to transfer me." '
The object of torture is to attain a predetermined false narrative which converges. So, who in the SS gave identical stories? Where does Morgen say he gave false witness?
The plain fact is you cannot quote an SS denial - at any time - or present evidence of torture linked to Holocaust.
You won't change history with horsemeat, sausages and hearsay, bright lad.
Hoess gave countless other statements, interrogatories and affidavits, plus a psychological profile and a complete set of memoirs in which his treatment under all nationalities was recorded, good and bad.
He stood trial 12 months later, bright lad. And changed or recanted what?
"This document was presented to me in its finished form. I asked to be allowed to read and study this document in my cell in Oberursel and decide whether I could sign it. That was denied me. During the conversation an officer was consulted who, I was told, belonged to the Polish or Russian army; and it was made clear to me that if I hesitated too long in signing this document I would be handed over to the Russian authorities. ...
... Then this Polish or Russian officer entered and asked, "Where is Sauckel's family? We know Sauckel, of course we will take him with us; but his family will have to be taken into Russian territory as well" I am the father of 10 children. I did not stop to consider; and thinking of my family, I signed this document."
Yes, let's leave Hoess and go to Sauckel. Because the Sauckel testimony at the IMT, the dealing with his claims in open court and the obvious conspiracy to hide or bury such claims, does threaten the historical narrative, doesn't it?
I'll watch Reuters while you continue to emerge from the stupor induced by all the cherry-picking. ;-)
"May it please the Tribunal, I should like to make a motion to the case of Streicher. I desire to move that Streicher's testimony found on Pages 8495, and 8496 of April 26th be expunged from the Record, and on Page 8549 of yesterday's testimony."
"SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: Let me remind you of the evidence that has been given before this Court, that as far as Auschwitz alone is concerned, 4,000,000 people were exterminated. Do you remember that?"
"With regard to Auschwitz, the Tribunal heard the evidence of Hoess, the Commandant of the camp from 1st May, 1940, to 1st December, 1943. He estimated that in the camp of Auschwitz alone in that time 2,500,000 persons were exterminated, and that a further 500,000 died from disease and starvation."
Point out 4 000 000 and then tell us who was tortured into admitting it, just so the IMT could 'prove' it in the judgement?
"SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: Let me remind you of the evidence that has been given before this Court, that as far as Auschwitz alone is concerned, 4,000,000 people were exterminated. Do you remember that?"
""Psychologically I was almost cut in pieces. They wanted to know all about everything, and this was also done by Jews. They left me in no doubt whatever as to the fate that was in store for me"
- Hoess (on his time at Nuremberg, as a "defence witness" LMAO)
You asked for proof of Weber's lies, but you never came back, so take a look at the soap narrative. The IMT sample was proven to contain human material and Weber's input on the subject is littered with bullshit.
It's ridiculous to suggest that animals can be made into a useful by-product, of course.
A living thing turned into glue, sausages, burgers, hot dogs, footwear and fabrics? How preposterous!
Really, really? When was it proven to contain human material, and why does that mean Weber is a liar?
"The Chancellor of the German Reich has authorized me to say, on the authority of the German Government, that there was never any foundation for it (corpse factory). I need scarcely add that on behalf of its Majesty's Government I accept this denial, and I trust that this false report will not again he revived." - Austen Chamberlain 1925
Poland's Institute for National Remembrance based findings on a lab analysis of a piece of soap found in 1945 in the medical academy run by Rudolf Spanner...analysis revealed human fat was one of its components, IPN's Paulina Szumera told Deutsche Presse-Agentur. Human remains used to make the soap were believed to have been brought from Kaliningrad and the Stutthof camp. The piece of soap was used as evidence in the Nuremburg trials."
Weber makes several more bullshit claims on soap, in regards to the IMT, Shirer and British witness evidence....but I'm just leaving. Soap forensic source: Mail & Guardian, October 6, 2006 "Tests show that Nazis used human remains to make soap."
The Van Roden claim was debunked years ago, mainly by the Baldwin Subcommittee, VR himself and the ineptitude of Butz's piss-poor research. Even the muppets have discarded that one.
"If the proposition is that 1210 was obtained under duress. Great."
Hmmm
Soap!!! LMAO just LMAO the ridiculous WW1 "corpse factory" is still being defended by shabbos goys in 2011.
Cleveland Jewish News
Monday, February 14, 2005
Historians believe the Nazis did not make soap out of human corpses, despite long-held beliefs. DNA samples of previous bars of soaps believed to be made that way have found no human fats.
"the ridiculous WW1 "corpse factory" is still being defended by shabbos goys in 2011"
No. The point was to prove Weber a liar and you wrong.
The IMT sample contained human matter and Weber repeatedly misrepresented historical writing, IMT testimony and academic opinion on soap. You aren't even aware of the Baldwin transcript on crushed testicles and instead rely on paraphrased hearsay, sausages. and an edited Sauckel excerpt.
"Raising his voice to a shrill cry, he declared that after he found himself in allied captivity he was kept for four days in a cell without clothes. "I was made to kiss negroes' feet. I was whipped. I had to drink saliva," he declared. He paused for breath, and then screamed: "My mouth was forced open with a piece of
The IMT soap sample contained human material. Fact. The IMT judgement said attempts were made, it didn't say they were proven. Fact. Weber lied about each individual element of his soap diatribe, particularly testimony given by British witness(es). Fact.
Unfortunately, unless the host edits me out, we can all see who's indulging in the false indifference and Jewish sniping.
Yes, David Olere's cooking up some kremawursts, on his vertical wire mesh columns. You've got to be careful though, a Krema III's muffle can cremate an entire human in 15mins, so to cook an Olere kremawurst to perfection only takes an instant.
"The IMT soap sample contained human material. Fact."
The IMT proved the Nazis killed 4,000,000 at Auschwitz. Fact.
Sereny: "The Authority has found after considerable research that only one experiment was made, with a few corpses from a concentration camp. When it proved impractical the idea was apparently abandoned.”
So wrong on that one.
Laqueur: "It emerged after the war that the [soap] story was in fact untrue."
So the IMT claim and judgement was upheld as true and the broad assumption that soap factories and production lines existed, never got off the ground.
So HG wasn't being told it was a fact and his dismissive reaction was left in the record? Shock! Horror! Maxwell-Fyfe offered precisely what the judgement did and presented what Hoess had presented.
Not a proven acceptance, not a stated finite number and not a fact. This might be because the IMT was not the Auschwitz or Hoes trial.
You think?
So who else was tortured into the 4 000 000 that you now cannot quote in the judgement, bright lad?
"Let me remind you of the evidence that has been given before this Court, that as far as Auschwitz alone is concerned, 4,000,000 people were exterminated."
You're right, "evidence" and "facts" are not the same thing when it come to the Ho£ocaust.
"I describe incidents which may or may not have happened but which are true."
It seems to consist of a theory that top nazis not associated with Holocaust or directly implicated in mass murder, were tortured into openly complaining of torture, through stories which differed at every telling.
“I don’t have anything to hide. Terrible things happened at Auschwitz, and I did my best to help. One could not do everything. There were terrible disasters there. I could only save so many. I never killed anyone or hurt anyone. I can prove I am innocent of what they could say against me. I am building the facts for my defense. I want to turn myself in and be cleared at a trial.”
- Dr. Mengele
Wonder how his friends managed to talk him out of it?
Surely you heard Mengele's journals were auctioned last week? This book is the only one that included extracts from his 30+ journals. Wanna know why? Because they rubbish the Orthodox story. Yep, he was a racist by 21st pc standards, but not by Winston "Keep England White" Churchill standards.
google: "Dr. Mengele denied Auschwitz was a death factory" to see auction catalogue
@timpovikings Baer was tracked down in 1960, after 2.5yrs in custody he "had a heart attack" and "died."
He'd worked as a lumber jack from 1945 - 1960, was only 51 &his wife said he was in excellent health.
Post-mortem reported: "The ingestion of an odourless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out." But instead of further inquiry, the Zionist Chief Prosecutor Fritz Bauer ordered his body cremated. Reports in the French press, stated, he refused to confirm the existence of gas chambers.
Did you not read the PRNewswire article on Mengele's journals, linked on my blog? Obviously not.
"He also offers his opinions on a myriad of subjects, including race-mixing, the Nuremburg war crimes trials, justification of the concentration camp system, and denial of the conditions at the camps."
Auschwitz SS Doctor, the notorious Dr. Mengele, denies the myth, poor you and your broken theory LOL
Only very brief excerpts form Mengele's 3,300 page journals have ever been published, in the Exterminationist book I sourced earlier (but even they includes references to Mengele's denial). ALL other historians have been denied access to the journals. Why was that do you think Tim? Surely if the Mengele admitted he sent 400,000 Jews to be gassed, don't you think we might of heard?
LMAO.
The "No Member of the SS Denied the Final Solution" theory is gone, gone gone.
So no-one's looked at them except the Jewish buyer and no-one's had control of them except Jews and you can't quote him denying diddly, then. Wow! That IS spooky.
Baer...I've no idea. You said he made a denial and I'm still waiting, brightness.
Deleting posts again Tim (Windowlicker's Guide) I got it any way.
Baer was in custody for 2.5 years before he "died" - Maybe they didn't get round to questioning him. He was hardly a major figure, only being the commandant of Auschwitz. Strange that reports in the French press said he adamantly refused to confirm the existence of gas chambers. Strange that his autopsy confirmed that "The ingestion of an odourless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out." as the cause of death
If you got it, you'll see why it was deleted. I'm not a great typist.
Strange that you said he denied it, because he didn't; that you don't put up his responses to the Eichmann interrogatory; that you don''t tell us his actual Cause of Death; that you similarly have no denial from Mengele....and you said you had one from each!
I bet Baer also didn't admit or confess to vanilla ice cream and Stalingrad. That must mean he denied them, then. LOL!
"It is known, however, that 4 million Jews died in concentration camps, and that 2 million Jews were killed by the state police in the East, making a total of 6 million murdered Jews. The source of these figures in Adolph Eichmann, Chief of the Jewish section of the Gestapo. The figures are contained in an affidavit made by Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl, Deputy Group Leader of the Foreign Section of the Security Section"
But how did Eichamnn react, brightness. I only just removed the court video of him stuttering and farting over his police transcript.
What I can't get over is the muppet logic which says if someone doesn't acknowledge something, or talks to a Munich pharmacist....THAT'S a denial! LMFAO!
Eichmann denied giving Hottl that figure. I've told you where to find that before. Forgotten? You must of developed CJD from all the Olere kremawursts you've munched.
Why won't Baer's interrogation transcripts be released, why aren't Mengele's journals allowed to be studied. Is it because they don't back up the Big Lie and contain DENIALS.
"If Hoettl is here using figures, I must comment that no one received such figures from me, because I myself had none. In this connection it is odd that everyone claims to have received figures from me.."
- Eichmann.
Eichmann trial - The District Court Sessions: Session 87
Eichmann denied giving Hoettl the figure Tim. I've posted it, you've read, it's easily verified on Nizkor. But you still deny it. You're real special.
My laughter acronyms are not anywhere near as numerous, nor as spurious as yours. Tim.
I'll accept you diversional tactic as an admittance that you were wrong, again. And you now accept Eichmann did indeed deny giving Hoetll the 6,000,000 figure.
In the case of Baer, who was in custody for 2.5 years, but due to his *sudden death* - the interrogation transcripts of this particularly important figure in the Big Lie would be of huge importance. Just as the Mengele journals are.
But Jews have decided to bury both, and instead promulgate the hLOLcaust with Johnny-come-lately on the Holocaust scene: Irene "one girl, five diamonds" Zisblatt and her yarn of how she was chosen to become a lampshade. Speaks volumes.
I don't think it's really an either or situation, mate. Eichmann was interrogated - and published, but you don't want to go near the man.
You began with three key denials and now, beause you can't post one, you want to talk about irrelevant bullshit concerning diamonds and transcripts only you have seen!
Krematorium IIIn this complex, I observed that the building with the furnace room and its ancillary rooms is entirety completed, as is the large corpse cellar 1.
Corpse cellar 2 is completed as far as possible apart from removal of the formwork for the ceiling, work which depends on there being no frost. The 5 3-muffle incineration furnaces are ready and are at present being warmed through for drying. Inspection report of 29/1/43 by Engineer Prüfer of Messrs Topf & Son--Pressac
clintonearlwalker 3 months ago
"Auschwitz commandant denied gassings & murdered for it"
We know this because there is no denial and he died of natural causes. Having died, a full, false, planted confession was considered, but vague ambiguity was felt to be the better option.
Mengele denied "camp conditions" which is why they won't publish his memoirs.
A German magazine had them, historians have seen them and they went on sale in an open auction. These are always the best ways of ensuring nothing gets out.
timpovikings 7 months ago
Baer autopsy supplementary comment:
"The ingestion of an odourless, non-corrosive poison… cannot be ruled out.”
The object of the ellipsis will shortly be auctioned off to ensure it never gets out.
timpovikings 7 months ago
Comment removed
timpovikings 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lynchie3000
I thought extracts appeared in 1985?
So, you haven't seen any denials and the buyer wants to publish. Baer could have taken poison and EIchmann denied something you won't post and admitted something else...you won't post.
I'll keep an eye on Reuters. I suspect they'll hear about you any day now.
timpovikings 7 months ago
PRNewswire
June 30, 2011
"Auschwitz "Angel of Death" Josef Mengele's Unknown Writings to be Auctioned
... He also offers his opinions on a myriad of subjects, including race-mixing, the Nuremburg war crimes trials, justification of the concentration camp system, and denial of the conditions at the camps."
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
That's....that's really subtle.
" and denial of the conditions at the camps."
A condition of a camp is a gas chamber, is it?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Sure the 3,300 pages of Mengele's journals must do nothing but back up the case he:
- selected 400,000 Jews to be gassed
- sewed Tito & Nino together
- attempted to change Irene Zisblatts eye colour
- taught that dog to attack a Jewish pianist for playing wrong notes
- etc etc
That's why they have never allowed his journals to be examined
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
!!! So where are these denials?
Have you seen them, then?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
"So where are these denials?"
A Jew paid $300K for Mengele's journals last week, for a private collection. Where he lives? I've no idea.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
So the journals are crucial, because of a series of assumptions on what MUST be in them?! LOL!
Have you seen these denials and what was the COD on Baer?
Is it something they're putting in the water down there, mate? If you get any denser, you'll stop reflecting light!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
We know they contained denials because the PRNewswire states they do.
Once again for the stupid boy: The report on the autopsy for the COD states: "Natural causes ... The ingestion of an odorless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out."
So, Hoess biography is considered hugely important, but Mengele's journals are not. Why is that Tim?
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
So if a news source says something is so, it is or must be so, is that right, brightness?
More poor man straw man, mate! How do you know the Jew won't publish, I thought Posner saw them, I thought you said it was in there, I thought the journals were not always in Jewish hands!?
So the casue of death was not sinister and could equally be suicide, is that fair?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
(look straw-man up Tim, you're really making a fool of yourself by this constant misuse of the term)
Mengele's journals are suspected to give the full details of his experiment with gypsy twins Tito and Nino. And his method of how he sewed the veins of two individuals together.
That is why they won't allow them to be published - They're too horrifying.
The cause of death was sinister Tim "The ingestion of an odorless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out." is a bit of a clue
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Okay...in Lego...
What was the Cause of Death?
LOL! I'm sure you're entitled to an opinion, but frankly, it's you who doesn't know how to construct a reasonable false argument.
What might or might not be in them and an assumption that that unknown content dictates future publishing, or not, is a windowlicker's excuse of a false proposition.
Have the Germans had them?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Could he have taken the poison himself, bright lad?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
>>> "Could he have taken the poison himself"
Like Himmler did? Sure. Maybe ODESSA delivered it to him in one of the Nazi flying disks.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
So that's a yes. I'm afraid conditions and caveats just make you look unwilling to state the obvious.
Have the Germans had the Mengele material?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
So it's obvious to you is it Tim, that Baer committed suicide?
Do you think there is a Nazi base on the far side of the Moon as well?
As far as I am aware, Occupied Germany has never been in possession of the Mengele diaries. And if they had been, and they had read the denials they evidently contain. The Occupied Germans would have of course burnt the journals along with Germar Rudolf's books that also deny Holocaustiany.
Amen
lynchie3000 7 months ago
Comment removed
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Extracts did appear in 1985.
Nice conspiracy theory on Baer you're developing there. How'd he get the poison do you think? Did he keep some Zyklon B crystals up his arse, for old time's sake?
I bet you the Royal County of Berkshire (which I'll have to buy first), that these journals are not published in their entirety before 2020.
Eichmann admitted a lot. Including that he didn't give Hoettl the 6m figure, which you have now finally admitted is true.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
You should have stopped at 'Amen'.
Why does mention of a colourless substance in a dead man's stomach mean murder only?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
They will not published anything *about Auschwitz* from those journals before 2020, not a sausage.
Baer was in a prison when he died Tim. Further inquiry into his death wasn't made. The autopsy report which stated "The ingestion of an odourless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out." did not seem to interest the chief prosecutor.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Leave it for another time, mate. The brightness seems to be dimming.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
I'll reword that. Why does that mention of an unknown substance not include the possibility of suicide.
I have no theory, mate. Suicide or otherwise. You're the one making the emphatic claims of items you haven't ever seen. I'm trying to understand why he couldn't have taken something.
Talk of Berkshire, Zyklon and even sausages would be superfluous in these circumstances, mate.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
A conspiracy theory would be a thesis which says a document wasn't published specifically because of content you've never laid eyes on bright lad.
timpovikings 7 months ago
Amen.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Did the Germans ever have the diaries and what has the buyer said about any further exposure of them?
You don't seem to say on your bullshit blog, mate?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Read the ynet news link:
"I feel a great obligation this should be shown to the public," the buyer said.
He said in the right hands the documents can be used as a force for good to counter Holocaust deniers and to reject any philosophy that leads to discrimination."
So lets hope he'll scan them, put them on a pdf and then upload them on the web.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Testing...testing...123
What was the Cause of Death, bright lad?
timpovikings 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timpovikings
>>> "What was the Cause of Death, bright lad?"
Already posted Tim
lynchie3000 7 months ago
"during all the time he was in Auschwitz, he (Richard Baer) had never seen gas chambers, nor had he known that any existed"
- Rivarol (Paris (Paris, France Tim) magazine)
Further details are not available because he died and "the ingestion
of an odourless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
I should be more accurate, mate. This is muppet level straw man.
Again, hearsay and periodicals "as evidence", but no denials.
What was the Cause of Death on the report?
timpovikings 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timpovikings
>>> "What was the Cause of Death on the report?"
"natural causes ... The ingestion of an odorless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out."
lynchie3000 7 months ago
Look up what "straw-man" means Tim. You're continual misuse of the term is ridiculous.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
You're making a false argument that denials exist but are prevented from exposure.
You have no SS denials.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Apart from Mengele and Baer of course.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
You attempt to displace your responsibility to post these denials by arguing fallaciously that they are there but you, we, everyone in fact, are prevented from seeing them.
Except you infer you have seen them! LOL!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
"Except you infer you have seen them! LOL!"
Really, how exactly do I do that?
lynchie3000 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lynchie3000: "We must never forget the lies Jews have told about WW2."
Nor the truth the SS have told ever since and the SS denials that no-one can seem to find.
timpovikings 7 months ago
Comment removed
timpovikings 7 months ago
"I must have told him the contents of the statistician's report. I must have told him that. I think the comprehensive report ended with a total of five million. That's what I seem to remember."
Adolf Eichmann denying the kabbalistic 6 million.
timpovikings 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lynchie3000
Tell me how important published interrogations are, bright lad?
These are obviously cogent information, important for the wider picture and a clear view of all evidence gathered, right? Interrogation transcripts contain a wealth of detail and are often the most realistic first opportunity of obtaining lucid and honest recall from these characters, aren't they?
timpovikings 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lynchie3000
So the latest edition of the windowlicker's guide to hanging on to your credibility is, if someone doesn't admit/confess something....that's a denial?
ROFLMFAOOOOOOO!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
And how did they engineer that only a Jew would buy them, brightness?
timpovikings 7 months ago
Oh look!
He's gone again.
timpovikings 7 months ago
If Holocaust had taken place there should be concrete evidence of it...instead of arguing over testimonies and 2nd hand evidences one must conduct forensic investigation and analyze the 1st hand evidences; an average human being makes about 1.5 Kg of ash. If we assume at least 4 million out of 6 million wer burnt in the Krema, at least 6 million kgs of human ashes should be there; not to mention extra fuel ashes. some ashes do exist Majdanek etc. investigation is imp. It is pontless to fight.
criptsmacker 9 months ago
@criptsmacker Dr. Leon Wells, retired sonderkommando, testified at the Eichmann trial (session 23)
"After grinding the bones WE USED TO THROW THE ASHES UP IN THE AIR SO THAT THEY WOULD DISAPPEAR, replace the earth on the graves and plant seeds, so that nobody could recognize that there ever was a grave there"
lynchie3000 8 months ago
Quote: Hans Baur to me in 1983: "Wir wollen nur daß die Lügen endlich aufhören und die Wahrheit erzählt wird."
Avalon400 9 months ago
Quote: Hans Baur to me in 1983:
"Wir wollen nur daß die Lügen endlich aufhören and die Wahrheit erzählt wird."
Avalon400 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Rheinmetall20mm U R A CRUDE UNEDUCATED NEO-NAZI SKINHEAD !
I have uncles who fought and died for Grossdeutschland. I met & spoke with Hans Baur in 1983. He vehemently denied the so called "Holocaust"
Do U even know who the Hell HANS BAUR WAS ? ? ? ? . . . (1898-1993).
He was AH's private pilot from 1933 to 1945, was taken prisoner by the USSR and spent 14 yrs in soltary confinement for his high position in the Reich.
Avalon400 9 months ago
@Rheinmetall20mm
This is a classic example of the sub-human mentality of those who hate Germany and its history and who believe every word of propoganda told to them. Thay all have FOUL MOUTHS to match their small brains.
Avalon400 9 months ago
@Avalon400 "Rheinmetal" U R a CRUDE UNEDUCATED NEO-NAZI SKINHEAD !
I have uncles who fought and died for Grossdeutschland. I met & spoke with Hans Baur in 1983. He denies the so called "Holocaust"
Do U even know who the Hell HANS BAUR WAS ? ? ? ? . . . (1898-1993).
Avalon400 9 months ago
We still find the bones of Dynasaurs that died 70 million ago, but no bones from the 6 million victims of the supposed Holocaust. I guess every last one of them was burnt up in those tiney crematorium? Leaving no physical evidence behind at all. That must have been a lot of work. And all the fuel needed ! And Germany lost the war because it ran out of fuel !
Avalon400 11 months ago
@Avalon400 I don't think the dinosaurs were made extinct by being burnt to ash in crematoria...but I could be wrong there... And scraps of bones do exist its just that they are either buried in hollowed ground which archaeologists do not excavate out of respect or are already in mass graves on sites of their murder. Fuel was not an issue: They had coke fuel, fat produced by burning bodies reduced the overall need for fuel and many camps were in forested areas with tons of wood all around.
VideoHistoryToday 11 months ago
@VideoHistoryToday
From IMT Nuremberg transcript
One Hundred and Ninety-Seventh Day: Wednesday, 7th August, 1946
"As soon as death taken place in, the ventilators were started. When the air could be breathed again, the doors were opened, and the Jewish workers removed the bodies. By means of a special process which Wirth had invented, they were burned in the open air without the use of fuel." - Konrad Morgen (SS Judge)
lololololololololol
lynchie3000 8 months ago
@lynchie3000
So Morgen was a prosecution witness then, was he?
And he explained his mention of "without the use of fuel" meant no flammable material at all, or he meant no fuel as in fuel that would otherwise be used to run in an engine. Or is this just an assumption of the former?
Perhaps if you posted a non-sinister alternative or flat denial by an SS operative, another SS investigator, or an SS doctor at these sites, we could take or reject the testimony just as literally.
timpovikings 7 months ago 6
@timpovikings
Morgen was a defend witness was he? Like Hoess? LMAO
See Hitler's Heirs (1961) by Paul Meskil - page 51, for Morgen's claim Oskar Dirlewanger made soap from not just human fat, but from a human and horse fat mix. Nice.
Perhaps if Jews tortured you, and threatened to send your family to a gulag, you'd agree to pretty much anything they want you to.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Perhaps if you stopped blocking people or editing threads and answered the question on the original topic, we'd believe you.
Answer the 'fuel' point raised and then show us who in the camp system SS was tortured? At the minute, the denier line seems to be that the key protagonists were tortured into giving the exact same story through individual testimony which doesn't match anyone else's!!
timpovikings 7 months ago 11
@lynchie3000
A 50c paperback with hearsay, no reference or quote and an unspecified 1959 Nuremberg appearance.
I think I may have to capitulate. That's....that's just overwhelming. Really.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
It's the way with SS confessions, Hoess, Gerstein, Morgen et al
You have to cherry pick their testimony to make a plausible narrative. If you include the ridiculous assertions they all made, their credibility completely falls apart. As does the Holofaux.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
"You have to cherry pick their testimony to make a plausible narrative" No shit.
And edit, re-interpret, take out of context and ignore such parts that can also work for you, or not, as the case may be, right?
Morgen was interviewed in 1971 by Toland...
' He refused to testify that Koch made lampshades -- "The Americans almost killed me for it... They threatened three times to turn me over to the Russians or French or Poles and had started to transfer me." '
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
The object of torture is to attain a predetermined false narrative which converges. So, who in the SS gave identical stories? Where does Morgen say he gave false witness?
The plain fact is you cannot quote an SS denial - at any time - or present evidence of torture linked to Holocaust.
You won't change history with horsemeat, sausages and hearsay, bright lad.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
"The plain fact is you cannot quote an SS denial - at any time - or present evidence of torture linked to Holocaust."
LMAO
What, apart from Bernard Clarke admitting that he tortured Hoess and The Van Roden Report?
Once again Tim, I'm not denierbud, as flattering as that accusation is. He lives in California, I live in West London
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
More paperback evidence? Who was torturing Hoess a year after capture?
The VR Report? If this is Butz and “The Progressive” material.....more bullshit. Read the Baldwin Subcommittee of the Malmedy Hearings.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
"Once again Tim, I'm not denierbud, as flattering as that accusation is. He lives in California, I live in West London"
LOL! Don't be too flattered, mate. He's crap at it as well.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
\o/ yawn \o/
So Bernard Clarke admitting that he tortured Hoess. How does that reflect on the validity of Hoess confession.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
!?
So quote the Clarke admission....and it's source.
Hoess gave countless other statements, interrogatories and affidavits, plus a psychological profile and a complete set of memoirs in which his treatment under all nationalities was recorded, good and bad.
He stood trial 12 months later, bright lad. And changed or recanted what?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Rupert Butler: Legions of Death (1983)
"And changed or recanted what?" The Auschwitz death toll for one. Lets not forget Hoess had his family to protect (see next post)
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@timpovikings
(first)
"This document was presented to me in its finished form. I asked to be allowed to read and study this document in my cell in Oberursel and decide whether I could sign it. That was denied me. During the conversation an officer was consulted who, I was told, belonged to the Polish or Russian army; and it was made clear to me that if I hesitated too long in signing this document I would be handed over to the Russian authorities. ...
lynchie3000 7 months ago
Respond to this video...
(second)
... Then this Polish or Russian officer entered and asked, "Where is Sauckel's family? We know Sauckel, of course we will take him with us; but his family will have to be taken into Russian territory as well" I am the father of 10 children. I did not stop to consider; and thinking of my family, I signed this document."
- Ernst Friedrich Christoph "Fritz" Sauckel
IMT BS Vol. 15 p.63: 30 May 1946
Oh the strength of Nazi confessions lolololololol
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Yes, let's leave Hoess and go to Sauckel. Because the Sauckel testimony at the IMT, the dealing with his claims in open court and the obvious conspiracy to hide or bury such claims, does threaten the historical narrative, doesn't it?
I'll watch Reuters while you continue to emerge from the stupor induced by all the cherry-picking. ;-)
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
(first)
Can't keep up Tim? lol
"May it please the Tribunal, I should like to make a motion to the case of Streicher. I desire to move that Streicher's testimony found on Pages 8495, and 8496 of April 26th be expunged from the Record, and on Page 8549 of yesterday's testimony."
- Jackson: BS V.12 30.04.46 p.398
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
I find it a bit pointless to 'keep up' with any theory that says Streicher was key to top table nazi culpability in Holocaust.
You'll be quoting Butler next,
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Are you denying Streicher was tried, sentenced and executed at the IMT Nuremberg?
Are you denying that part of his testimony was deleted from the record?
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Quote the IMT judgement proving "the Nazis killed 4,000,000 at Auschwitz", bright lad...?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
"SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: Let me remind you of the evidence that has been given before this Court, that as far as Auschwitz alone is concerned, 4,000,000 people were exterminated. Do you remember that?"
BS Vol.9 p.611 - 21 March 1946
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
"With regard to Auschwitz, the Tribunal heard the evidence of Hoess, the Commandant of the camp from 1st May, 1940, to 1st December, 1943. He estimated that in the camp of Auschwitz alone in that time 2,500,000 persons were exterminated, and that a further 500,000 died from disease and starvation."
Point out 4 000 000 and then tell us who was tortured into admitting it, just so the IMT could 'prove' it in the judgement?
It isn't going well for you, but try to keep up.
timpovikings 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timpovikings
Once again:
"SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: Let me remind you of the evidence that has been given before this Court, that as far as Auschwitz alone is concerned, 4,000,000 people were exterminated. Do you remember that?"
BS Vol.9 p.611 - 21 March 1946
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
If the proposition is that 1210 was obtained under duress. Great.
Now tell us who tortured exactly the same material from him in American and Polish hands?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
""Psychologically I was almost cut in pieces. They wanted to know all about everything, and this was also done by Jews. They left me in no doubt whatever as to the fate that was in store for me"
- Hoess (on his time at Nuremberg, as a "defence witness" LMAO)
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Soap.
You asked for proof of Weber's lies, but you never came back, so take a look at the soap narrative. The IMT sample was proven to contain human material and Weber's input on the subject is littered with bullshit.
It's ridiculous to suggest that animals can be made into a useful by-product, of course.
A living thing turned into glue, sausages, burgers, hot dogs, footwear and fabrics? How preposterous!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings Soap, you mean IMT Exhibit USSR-393?
Really, really? When was it proven to contain human material, and why does that mean Weber is a liar?
"The Chancellor of the German Reich has authorized me to say, on the authority of the German Government, that there was never any foundation for it (corpse factory). I need scarcely add that on behalf of its Majesty's Government I accept this denial, and I trust that this false report will not again he revived." - Austen Chamberlain 1925
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Weber: “A human soap "recipe," allegedly prepared by Dr. Spanner (Nuremberg document USSR-196), was also presented.”
Where in that recipe is the word 'human'?
Weber: "(soap) this accusation was "proved" at the main Nuremberg trial of 1945-1946"
No. The judgement says "in some instances attempts were made to utilize the fat from the bodies of the victims in the commercial manufacture of soap.”
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
"SOAP FROM HUMAN REMAINS 7.10.2006.
Poland's Institute for National Remembrance based findings on a lab analysis of a piece of soap found in 1945 in the medical academy run by Rudolf Spanner...analysis revealed human fat was one of its components, IPN's Paulina Szumera told Deutsche Presse-Agentur. Human remains used to make the soap were believed to have been brought from Kaliningrad and the Stutthof camp. The piece of soap was used as evidence in the Nuremburg trials."
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Weber makes several more bullshit claims on soap, in regards to the IMT, Shirer and British witness evidence....but I'm just leaving. Soap forensic source: Mail & Guardian, October 6, 2006 "Tests show that Nazis used human remains to make soap."
The Van Roden claim was debunked years ago, mainly by the Baldwin Subcommittee, VR himself and the ineptitude of Butz's piss-poor research. Even the muppets have discarded that one.
It's mid-2011, mate. Wakey wakey!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
"It's mid-2011, mate. Wakey wakey!"
"If the proposition is that 1210 was obtained under duress. Great."
Hmmm
Soap!!! LMAO just LMAO the ridiculous WW1 "corpse factory" is still being defended by shabbos goys in 2011.
Cleveland Jewish News
Monday, February 14, 2005
Historians believe the Nazis did not make soap out of human corpses, despite long-held beliefs. DNA samples of previous bars of soaps believed to be made that way have found no human fats.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
"the ridiculous WW1 "corpse factory" is still being defended by shabbos goys in 2011"
No. The point was to prove Weber a liar and you wrong.
The IMT sample contained human matter and Weber repeatedly misrepresented historical writing, IMT testimony and academic opinion on soap. You aren't even aware of the Baldwin transcript on crushed testicles and instead rely on paraphrased hearsay, sausages. and an edited Sauckel excerpt.
I surrender...again. LOL!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
(second)
"Raising his voice to a shrill cry, he declared that after he found himself in allied captivity he was kept for four days in a cell without clothes. "I was made to kiss negroes' feet. I was whipped. I had to drink saliva," he declared. He paused for breath, and then screamed: "My mouth was forced open with a piece of
wood, and then I was spat on. ...
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@timpovikings
(third)
" ... When I asked for a drink of water I was taken to a latrine and told, 'Drink'. These are the sort of things the Gestapo has been blamed for."
The Times Apr 27, 1946
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@timpovikings
"academic opinion on soap."
ROFLMFAO @ you
Gitta Sereney in 1974, Walter Laqueur in 1980, Deborah Lipstadt in 1981, stated the regurgitated WW1 "corpse factory" nonsense was exactly that.
Just because you, for some reason, still defend the long ago abandoned "soap" story - doesn't make Weber a liar, it makes you a sad joke.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
You're overcooking the reactions, mate.
The IMT soap sample contained human material. Fact. The IMT judgement said attempts were made, it didn't say they were proven. Fact. Weber lied about each individual element of his soap diatribe, particularly testimony given by British witness(es). Fact.
Unfortunately, unless the host edits me out, we can all see who's indulging in the false indifference and Jewish sniping.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
"overcooking"
Yes, David Olere's cooking up some kremawursts, on his vertical wire mesh columns. You've got to be careful though, a Krema III's muffle can cremate an entire human in 15mins, so to cook an Olere kremawurst to perfection only takes an instant.
"The IMT soap sample contained human material. Fact."
The IMT proved the Nazis killed 4,000,000 at Auschwitz. Fact.
LMAO "human soap" ROFL
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Sereny: "The Authority has found after considerable research that only one experiment was made, with a few corpses from a concentration camp. When it proved impractical the idea was apparently abandoned.”
So wrong on that one.
Laqueur: "It emerged after the war that the [soap] story was in fact untrue."
So the IMT claim and judgement was upheld as true and the broad assumption that soap factories and production lines existed, never got off the ground.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
In 1941 the Nazis made a propaganda poster taking the piss out British atrocity lies, including the "corpse factory" you're so sure was a "fact."
See Pressac A T&O page 547
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Maxwell-Fyfe offered both proof and judgement on day 87, did he?
How did GORING take that?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Goering? He pooh-poohed the Auschwitz 4m figure, as he did the Kabbalistic 6m figure.
"Well, I doubt it was 6,000,000."
The Nuremberg Diary (1947)
Gustave Gilbert
p. 152
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Where do I say a "corpse factory" was a fact, bright lad?
I said - and proved - the IMT soap sample had human material in it.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
So HG wasn't being told it was a fact and his dismissive reaction was left in the record? Shock! Horror! Maxwell-Fyfe offered precisely what the judgement did and presented what Hoess had presented.
Not a proven acceptance, not a stated finite number and not a fact. This might be because the IMT was not the Auschwitz or Hoes trial.
You think?
So who else was tortured into the 4 000 000 that you now cannot quote in the judgement, bright lad?
timpovikings 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timpovikings
"So HG wasn't being told it was a fact"
"Let me remind you of the evidence that has been given before this Court, that as far as Auschwitz alone is concerned, 4,000,000 people were exterminated."
You're right, "evidence" and "facts" are not the same thing when it come to the Ho£ocaust.
"I describe incidents which may or may not have happened but which are true."
- His Holocaustness Elie Wiesel
LOL
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
I like your style, mate.
It seems to consist of a theory that top nazis not associated with Holocaust or directly implicated in mass murder, were tortured into openly complaining of torture, through stories which differed at every telling.
Can you spin plates?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
SS denials include:
The notorious Dr. Mengele
Auschwitz commandant Richard Baer
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
That would explain why deniers never miss an opportunity to quote them!!!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
“I don’t have anything to hide. Terrible things happened at Auschwitz, and I did my best to help. One could not do everything. There were terrible disasters there. I could only save so many. I never killed anyone or hurt anyone. I can prove I am innocent of what they could say against me. I am building the facts for my defense. I want to turn myself in and be cleared at a trial.”
- Dr. Mengele
Wonder how his friends managed to talk him out of it?
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
So this is as cryptic as the IMT judgement that 'proves 4 000 000', then!
Point out the denial, would you, brightness? I can't seem to spot it.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
You attribute the quote to Mengele. But would you care to source it precisely, brightness?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Mengele: The Complete Story (1986)
Gérald L. Posner, John Ware, Michael Berenbaum
p.67 (2000 edition)
Surely you heard Mengele's journals were auctioned last week? This book is the only one that included extracts from his 30+ journals. Wanna know why? Because they rubbish the Orthodox story. Yep, he was a racist by 21st pc standards, but not by Winston "Keep England White" Churchill standards.
google: "Dr. Mengele denied Auschwitz was a death factory" to see auction catalogue
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
I asked if you'd attribute the Mengele 'denial' to source and I asked for your Baer 'denial'.
What seems to be the problem?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Poor Tim, don't even know who rabbi Michael Berenbaum, founding director of USHMM and senior historical advisor on Spielberg's "The Last Days" is?
I give you a clue .... he's never attended an IHR conference, although he did meet with Faurisson once.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Fascinating.
So are we getting some sources on the Mengele quote and Baer's 'denial' or are you abstaining?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
No.....I didn't think so.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
"SS denials include: Auschwitz commandant Richard Baer"
Go on, then....?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings Baer was tracked down in 1960, after 2.5yrs in custody he "had a heart attack" and "died."
He'd worked as a lumber jack from 1945 - 1960, was only 51 &his wife said he was in excellent health.
Post-mortem reported: "The ingestion of an odourless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out." But instead of further inquiry, the Zionist Chief Prosecutor Fritz Bauer ordered his body cremated. Reports in the French press, stated, he refused to confirm the existence of gas chambers.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Any time you like with the Baer denial.....?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings Baer denials details are already posted on this thread, you've missed it.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
"you've missed it" No, you just didn't post one.
So, having selected the two best cards in the deck, it turns out that neither of them has in fact made a denial. The Mengele quote isn't even Mengele.
You should be under guard, bright lad. You're terrifying.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
"The Mengele quote isn't even Mengele."
ROFL or LMAO, actually both.
'If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.'
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay Melchett
lynchie3000 7 months ago
Comment removed
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Your frustration is tangible, brightness.
No SS protagonist has denied the mass murders. Fact.
You claim the IMT proved 4 mill. It didn't.
You offered a Mengele denial. He never made one.
Ditto Baer. He never made one.
You claim soap was never proven to contain human DNA. The IMT sample was proven.
You seem to be shooting yourself in all 4 trotters.....daily.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Poor Tim.
I'm sorry that I've breached your last line of defence. "The No SS Denials Last Stand"
Dr Mengele denied it, according to the director of the USHMM. Why don't you concentrate defending the moon landings, you might be better at that.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
I think the best you can do with hearsay, sausages and a pharmacist, is re-open the NotW, hold a boy scout jamboree and treat athlete's foot.
You breached diddly zip. But I'll keep a watch on Reuters and tell the universities to come to immediate readiness for close-down.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Hearsay's OK when it's from Höttl clearly Tim
*cough* Eichmann said 6,000,000 *cough*
Did you not read the PRNewswire article on Mengele's journals, linked on my blog? Obviously not.
"He also offers his opinions on a myriad of subjects, including race-mixing, the Nuremburg war crimes trials, justification of the concentration camp system, and denial of the conditions at the camps."
Auschwitz SS Doctor, the notorious Dr. Mengele, denies the myth, poor you and your broken theory LOL
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Like I say, brightness, if you had anything direct, you'd post it.
You're so sure of one single SS denial, you didn't even have the basic integrity to cite the source.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Poor Tim.
Only very brief excerpts form Mengele's 3,300 page journals have ever been published, in the Exterminationist book I sourced earlier (but even they includes references to Mengele's denial). ALL other historians have been denied access to the journals. Why was that do you think Tim? Surely if the Mengele admitted he sent 400,000 Jews to be gassed, don't you think we might of heard?
LMAO.
The "No Member of the SS Denied the Final Solution" theory is gone, gone gone.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
Comment removed
timpovikings 7 months ago
Comment removed
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Mengele's journals, my source.
They were brought by an anonymous Jew for $300,000. (ynet Jul 24, 2007: "Mengele journals sold to Jewish buyer" for a private collection.
So it looks like no historian will be able to look at them now either, because they contain nothing that backs-ups the Big, Big Lie.
Anyway, so did Baer make a confession whist in captivity?
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
So no-one's looked at them except the Jewish buyer and no-one's had control of them except Jews and you can't quote him denying diddly, then. Wow! That IS spooky.
Baer...I've no idea. You said he made a denial and I'm still waiting, brightness.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
"Dr. Mengele denied Auschwitz was a death factory "
“I don’t have anything to hide...."
Well, someone is hiding something, isn't he? Mengele doesn't deny a 'death factory' and the quote you post on your blog isn't Mengele, is it?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
What a mess.
Have a nice day. (smirks behind hand)
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Thanks Tim, I'm laughing loudly as you walk off with your tail between your legs.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Testing. Testing. 123...
Who does Posner attribute your Mengele 'denial' to?
Clue: It isn't Mengele.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Deleting posts again Tim (Windowlicker's Guide) I got it any way.
Baer was in custody for 2.5 years before he "died" - Maybe they didn't get round to questioning him. He was hardly a major figure, only being the commandant of Auschwitz. Strange that reports in the French press said he adamantly refused to confirm the existence of gas chambers. Strange that his autopsy confirmed that "The ingestion of an odourless, non-corrosive poison...cannot be ruled out." as the cause of death
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
If you got it, you'll see why it was deleted. I'm not a great typist.
Strange that you said he denied it, because he didn't; that you don't put up his responses to the Eichmann interrogatory; that you don''t tell us his actual Cause of Death; that you similarly have no denial from Mengele....and you said you had one from each!
I bet Baer also didn't admit or confess to vanilla ice cream and Stalingrad. That must mean he denied them, then. LOL!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
"reports in the French press said he adamantly refused to confirm the existence of gas chambers."
Hearsay central strikes again. You're a lad for bullshit and bluster, aren't you?
Perhaps if you posted them, then. I mean, there's nothing knocks down history like hearsay you can eat your sausage and chips off. LOL!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
"It is known, however, that 4 million Jews died in concentration camps, and that 2 million Jews were killed by the state police in the East, making a total of 6 million murdered Jews. The source of these figures in Adolph Eichmann, Chief of the Jewish section of the Gestapo. The figures are contained in an affidavit made by Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl, Deputy Group Leader of the Foreign Section of the Security Section"
RS V.1 XII
"Hearsay central strikes again"
SS Denials exist, get over it
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
But how did Eichamnn react, brightness. I only just removed the court video of him stuttering and farting over his police transcript.
What I can't get over is the muppet logic which says if someone doesn't acknowledge something, or talks to a Munich pharmacist....THAT'S a denial! LMFAO!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Eichmann denied giving Hottl that figure. I've told you where to find that before. Forgotten? You must of developed CJD from all the Olere kremawursts you've munched.
Why won't Baer's interrogation transcripts be released, why aren't Mengele's journals allowed to be studied. Is it because they don't back up the Big Lie and contain DENIALS.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Eichmann. No...he didn't.
So many questions, brightness! And you with all these denials.
I take it the upper case is shouting, is it? LOL!
timpovikings 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timpovikings
"Eichmann. No...he didn't."
LMAO - covering old ground here Timpleton
"If Hoettl is here using figures, I must comment that no one received such figures from me, because I myself had none. In this connection it is odd that everyone claims to have received figures from me.."
- Eichmann.
Eichmann trial - The District Court Sessions: Session 87
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
I can't resist, mate. Three's a charm and all that.
"Eichmann denied giving Hottl that figure"
Go on then, brightness......
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
I've already posted Eichmann's denial from his trial transcript on this thread.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Well done, mate.
A carefully worded opt out is always better than digging yourself in a bit deeper!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Eichmann denied giving Hoettl the figure Tim. I've posted it, you've read, it's easily verified on Nizkor. But you still deny it. You're real special.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Understand entirely, bright lad.
It's such an emphatic third denial for you, you can't bring yourself to put it up.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
I like the 'Tim' touch.
'Tim' comes in and the laughter acronyms disappear, each time you drop yourself in the poop.
I do like that.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
My laughter acronyms are not anywhere near as numerous, nor as spurious as yours. Tim.
I'll accept you diversional tactic as an admittance that you were wrong, again. And you now accept Eichmann did indeed deny giving Hoetll the 6,000,000 figure.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Well, put it this way, you apparently have three denials from key SS.
And you can't post a single one or them.
Ipso facto you have no denials.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Feet stamping Tim!
Mengele denials are in his journals, Jews won't allow to be published.
Ipso facto they have something to hide.
Baer denials are in his interrogations transcripts, Jews won't allow to be published.
Ipso facto they have something to hide.
Eichmann denied giving Hoettl the six million figure, I've posted this for you to read several times but you deny it exists.
Ipso fact you're acting like a child.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
So, still no SS denials worth posting, then.
We all react differently, brightness.
I stamp mine. You blow yours off. LOL!
timpovikings 7 months ago
Comment removed
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
"SS Denials exist"
I know, mate. They're so prolific and well known....you can't find one.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
There's Mengele's, but for some reason the Jews won't let historians study it.
I wonder why!
Hearsay's OK if if backs up the BIG lie
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
Nada.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Poor Tim, he's lost his special no SS denial argument.
But I expect to see you continually posting it anyway, even though you now know it's untrue.
Why don't you condole yourself with a Olere kremawurst?
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Interrogation transcripts?
Why yes, oh course they are. Once they've edited out the interrogators threats and German's cries of agony from having their testicles stood on.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
LMFAO! No shit.
So basically, they're everything when you haven't got one and irrelevant and coercive when you have.
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
In the case of Baer, who was in custody for 2.5 years, but due to his *sudden death* - the interrogation transcripts of this particularly important figure in the Big Lie would be of huge importance. Just as the Mengele journals are.
But Jews have decided to bury both, and instead promulgate the hLOLcaust with Johnny-come-lately on the Holocaust scene: Irene "one girl, five diamonds" Zisblatt and her yarn of how she was chosen to become a lampshade. Speaks volumes.
lynchie3000 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
I don't think it's really an either or situation, mate. Eichmann was interrogated - and published, but you don't want to go near the man.
You began with three key denials and now, beause you can't post one, you want to talk about irrelevant bullshit concerning diamonds and transcripts only you have seen!
You stamping your stumps?
timpovikings 7 months ago
@lynchie3000
If they die in custody with nothing by way of a denial, it's hugely important.
If they die before capture and talk to a tourist, it's hugely important.
if the die in custody having made an admission, it's coercion.
If they admit it in custody and survive to stand trial, it's a setup - forget the interrogation transcript.
Do you have jam on both sides of the toast....or do muppets not eat toast? LOL!
timpovikings 7 months ago
@timpovikings
Respond to this video...
Strawman Alert: "You began with three key denials"
Nope, just Mengele and Baer = two.
Eichmann denied giving Hoettl the 6m figure, that was my point, and I proved it.
Mengele's journals contain his denials, but they've been buried, as I proved.
lynchie3000 7 months ago