Added: 4 years ago
From: strykerxo
Views: 147,402
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (679)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Im sick of these super poor Russian and Chinese people who think their POS fighters are a match for the F-22.

  • i have always felt like i missed out not serving in our armed forces.

  • may have been your first upload, but best vid ive seen in a long time!

  • I want to see a russian SU try to do that shit that the F-22 just did at the begging of take off. That was amazing.

  • If you cant see it, then it shoots you down its definitely worth its salt. There are alot of great fighters out there ( like the Euro fighter) but if you do not see something on your 6 about to knock you out the sky. Well then maneuverable jets wont help.Back flips, and flat spins, with low speed aerial demonstration fighters are not going to do anything. I think the Su-S are highley over rated.

  • cool video. but the music sucks something terrible

  • I would agree with Zealot here..at a cost of over 150 million per copy, no situation in teh forseeable future where it is going to be used, is it any wonder that the project was cancelled after 187 of them were produced? Seems like an enormous waste of funds for something that hasn't seen combat deployment or combat whatsoever.

  • @wartmcbeighn What is your answer then? to replace the aging fleet of legacy AC. All of your comments were said about the F-14/15 when the were introduced. The F-35, a less capable AC, will cost a bit less than the F-22. How about keep the legacy AC flying, until the start falling out of the sky. Oh, I know, we can wait for a major conflict before we upgrade our fleet, get smoked by the PAK-FA T-50, and then you would be whining about our lack of preparedness.

  • @strykerxo The F-22 has so far been vastly superior to anything else out there. But maybe your one of the who believe the US is to superior and need to be on an equal footing with any foreseeable enemy.

    I concede on the current economic crisis, now answer this, if conditions were favorable is the F-22 a worth it's salt?

  • @strykerxo

    If the economic conditions were favorable, the F-22 still would not be worth its salt

  • @wartmcbeighn Well if you don't think that the T-50 will not endup in the hands of the bad guys of the world (N. Korea, Iran, Venezuala, etc.) this conversation is falling on deaf ears.

    The F-22 has an A2G capability, that is why it's loadout includes bombs, check it out.

    The SH is a Navy AC, not AF. and though capable does not meet AF requirments

    I know you are a troll, by the lack of knowlege.

  • @strykerxo

    OK maybe the contries mentioned are percived threats to the US...but not to Canada or a lot of others (wonder why that is), and what makes you think that Russia would export the T-50..its years away from entering service. The F-22 hasa nominal internal and minimal capacity for bombs nad the like, but was not intended for the switch rold when originally designed. As for lack of knowldge..your out in left field in the tall grass on that one, believe me

  • @wartmcbeighn Nominal load out in it's stealth configuration.

    the T-50 has the Indians as partners for the cash scrapped Russians and they will continue to sell for the cash

    see who has the SU-27 now and you will see who would likely have the T-50

    Canada who?

  • BEWARE! YOU ARE ENGAGING WITH A SERIAL CHILD ABUSER..HIS NAME IS WATMC..HE IS A SEXUAL FREAK THAT TALKS ABOUT 3YRD OLD BOYS BEING MOLESTED...THATS!!!! WHO THIS FREAK IS!!!!

  • @strykerxo

    Why would you think there would be a conflict with the PAK-FA in the first place?? The major problem with the F-22 is it's lack of multi-role capability...all it is really good at is air-air combat...and when was the last air-air-combat?? he F-35, due to overweight and cost overruns has a 2 year delay in entering operational service..guess the US air force, among others, is glad the adequate F-18 super hornet can pick up the slack

  • @wartmcbeighn You're joking right? The F-22 is a multi-role fighter dumb ass. It has a capability to drop bombs.

    That has got to be the most stupidest comment I ever read.

    You are comparing the F-35 and its prices?!??! The F-22 is way more expensive then the F-35. Based on your lack of knowledge it is clear you're a ignorant idiot that knows nothing about aircraft.

    F-22 can carry Bombs under its fuselage and on the wings near the fuselage.

  • @shadowhunter388

    The F-22's main mission that it has been tailored for is air-superiority...it can carry a nominal bombload, but it's pretty tiny compared to specialized aircraft such as the A-10. If the F-22 is so damn good...why is it not seeing combat?? Aircraft such as teh Typhoon and Rafale are in war zones currently...guss the F-22 is too valuable an airshow performer to put into combat

  • @wartmcbeighn The plane doesn't need to be in war to prove its dominance. What war was the Typhoon or Rafale in?

  • @wartmcbeighn You're wrong about one thing imparticular. The F 22 rarely does airshows. It did on here recently, and it was the longest show, about 5 minutes. It does not do them hardly anywhere and when it does, it does not land, it returns to the home base. Even in the UK or Paris. Flies in and flies out, that's it...

  • @wartmcbeighn  Typhoon and Rafale are in war zones currently.... doing what exactly? Nothing.

  • @OlderG0ds

    Rafale and Typhoon are providing ground support to troops, inlike the F-22..it's too busy doing the airshow circuit..lol

  • @wartmcbeighn Maybe because the F-22 is an AIR-SUPERIORITY FIGHTER.... Einstein.

  • @OlderG0ds They changed the designation to "Air-dominance Fighter".....I guess the reason being that it is a leap forward in capability. The F-15 is desiganated Air-Superiority.

  • @OlderG0ds. Actually they are bombing the living shit out of Gaddafi.

  • @mr9396 F-22 is not a bomber, rofl. Why the hell would they send it into Libya to drop bombs when our F-15 and F-16 can do it better.

    He's implying they aren't sending F-22 into Libya becuase it isn't good?? When it's role is air superiority and there's nothing in the air to fight.

  • @OlderG0ds. Maybe the fact that it isn't a bomber the point he is trying to make?

  • For all of you Anti-america people, the F22 in a simulation took out 4 F15's without being shot down, and the F15 has never been shot down and is the reason for US air superiority for the last 25 years.

  • @vroomba03 You idiot, more than 200 F 15's were lost to Iraqi planes during the first gulf war. And the Iraqi's were using mig's.

  • @dogwolf666 You idiot, i was talking about air to air combat, in which none were lost. Only 2 were lost due to ground fire, so chill out.

  • @dogwolf666

    bullshit F-15 has never been shot down by another aircraft . 104-0

  • typical commy reply. if the soviets are so dominant why then did the fall apart because your socialist ways will never work. America is a great nation because people from all nations came here to be free unlike your country. America is a great nation because were a good country with good people that help the whole world.

  • How can you compare a plane not even combat-worthy yet (given its tons of problems that still exist) to any other plane? That is terrible logic. It's like saying nothing comes close to Sukhoi T-50 when it is not even in service yet.

  • @GoldenZealot21 OK, your right, it might come close, and then get waxed

  • @strykerxo

    Or rather, the F-22 continues to be the failure it is, and comes nowhere near the T-50 when it finally enters service, not having a million defect like the F-22. XD

  • @GoldenZealot21 lol, when the day comes that Russian AC take a lead in air combat against US AC I will concede, until then Raptor Rules T-50's drool. lol

  • @GoldenZealot21 You're not very bright are you? Obviously misinformed also. T-50 should not even be mentioned in the same sentence and the F 22 is far more advanced than the "T-50" will ever hope to be. Like the mig. 28 they make false claims that later revealed tot he world. Stupid ass Russians didn't even know about stealth 10 years after we had already developed it. If the F 22 is such a failure, why are so many of our allies begging to buy them?

  • @brofranomo couse unfortunatelly their politicians like to eat american shit, but I hope that'll change...

  • @konnieciu I'm not sure what you are talking about. Whos politicians are you referring to? Russia's or China's? You're Polish and you hate Americans?

  • @konnieciu Would you rather be speaking German?

  • @GoldenZealot21 T 50 is has not even been put into production and very well not be, and if it is, it will be out of desperation to keep up. Just like always, the Ruskies are behind on everything. China is is doing a better job than the Russians.

  • sukhoi su-37 v f-22 raptor?

  • @tetramoo I would like to see that also F-22 wins

  • hey the f-35! does all thoes things ( including supersonic speed ) but better IT CAN HOVER! so a 0 ft. takeoff roll and landing!!!!!!

  • nice

  • its too bad Obama was willing to piss away billions on bailing out banks and car makers but he stoped funding for this program and now no more of these aircraft shall be built. The F-22 is indeed the benchmark for modern military attack aircraft.

  • all the planes flying together looks cool

  • The Raptor is an incredibly beautiful aircraft. I liked the way you worked in some other beautiful aircraft, F-4, A-10. and especially P-51. Nice job, Stryker.

  • can't repost, but check out part 2

  • Just another reason we are bankrupt.

  • wow bud good shyt not bad for a first upload! 5 stars!

  • Why do people who make these videos assume that we want to listen to music? I wanted to hear the jet as well.

  • Took my new girlfriend to air show at PT MUGU naval base a few years back. She wasn't into it until the F-22 came out and did it's thing. OH MY!!!!!!!!!! I can't describe the feeling and the look on my babies face

  • @docjoesjets If your "babie" knew how much of your Tax Dollars this failure cost. I guarantee her look would be a lot more incredible...lol.

  • @EnglishTurbines what failure u fucking moron this is the most advanced stealth and jet fighter on the planet and u call it a failure? you're just jealous cuz u guys cant cum up with anything like that. and all the tax dollars are worth it. to know that we have the best pilots in the world in the best stealth and jet fighter in the world protecting us so how bout u just stop commenting.

  • @iBuRzT F22...No faster than EF....Euro radar can see it....Less agile as you say, especially at higher ends of the speed envelope....We have cutting edge longer range European Missile Technology....How is it better again?

  • @EnglishTurbines ok first of all the typhoon is not faster, the typhoons top speed is 1,320 mph which is about mach 2.0 the f-22 raptor does 1500 mph which is mach 2.25 no radar on the planet can see it because you can not make radar better you can make your radar scan farther away but in the end its still going to be the same radar signals getting obsorbed by the f-22's paint job and materials of the fuselage. it has the radar signature of less than a bird.

  • @iBuRzT Europe defeated so called Stealth years ago...get up to speed.

  • @EnglishTurbines so yeah thats how its better. why dont you do a little research next time or at least know what youre talking about. just cuz u went and looked something up doesnt mean you know what you're talking about.

  • @EnglishTurbines the only plane that can even come close to being competition for the f-22 is the russian su-37. and in the end its about the pilot of the plane and guess what, we have the best pilots in the world. we have the best infantry in the world (marines, rangers, navy seals) than it would most likely be the s.a.s. we have the most advanced naval destroyers, submarines, air craft carriers and jets. and we have the most advanced missile systems in the world.

  • @iBuRzT in other words missile systems that can shoot down satellites in our atmosphere that are traveling 30,000 mph. you know how advanced of a tracking system you need for something like that? and missiles that shoot down other missiles. so dont even talk about having better missile systems.

  • @iBuRzT Look up Meteor Missile, and get up to speed on current Technology....Not US technology only.

  • @EnglishTurbines yeah i watched it and if you woulda payed attention you would have seen that it only compares it to other european missiles u moron. ur missiles arent shit compared to the us's.

  • @EnglishTurbines for instance look up, Future Weapons: THAAD Missile and patriot pac-3 missile test, and the aegis missile defense system. those are all of the most advanced missiles in the world. all of them intercept other missiles, ballistic missiles, planes, and the aegis missile shoots downn satellites that are traveling

  • @iBuRzT Im talking about Air to Air Missiles fuckwit.....Stick to video games, sounds like you belong in one...

  • You seem to forget who saved your asses in ww2. The US did

  • @Mr406400 It is a question of who saved whose butt. Study history and you will find out that second front opened in the mid summer of 1943 when Soviet Union had already started a major push to kick the Nazis outside its borders. The invasion of France by U.S. forces took place in the mid summer of 1944. If that did not happen, it would take Soviets a little longer but they would overtake the whole Europe and England and you'd be next and probably speak Russian by now. Don't act like a savior.

  • @EnglishTurbines around 30,000 mph. which is around 50,000 kmh. they are all the fastest missiles on the planet also.

  • F-35 is also a pretty good aircraft with everything it has, also the F-22's thrust vectoring engines are amazing

  • They are impressive jets, but nobody can afford to buy them in large amounts. Even the pentagon said they were too expensive and stopped ordering them. For the cost of a single raptor you can purchase two f-35 Lightnings. The f-35 may not have the power plant the 22 does but it does have a stronger advantage in terms of armament, electronics, operating costs (More efficient in terms of fuel and lower maintainance costs), and so on. It'd be interesting to see the two aircraft side by side.

  • only the Sopwith Camel can beat the F-22!!!

  • "F-22 Raptor nothing comes close" - such a sad statement shot down by the liberal government taking the biggest fucking shit in the history of man kind on the F-22 Project.

    R.I.P. One of a kind, F-22 Raptor.

  • for every 1 hour of flight, the F22 requires 33 hours of maintenance. The F22 averages 1 critical failure every 1.7 hours of flight time. The radar absorbing skin makes it vulnerable to rain. The pilot is isolated 100% from communication with everyone else in the sky. The armor is so light it cant withstand small arms fire.

    Cost to make per unit - $356 million

  • This jet really does out rank every fighter out there. My dad flew F-4's off the Oriskany and when we saw this plane at a demo his jaw dropped. He couldnt believe what this aircraft was capable of in comparison to the F-4

  • UFO's don't come close, they surpass the F22!

  • whish i could hear the plane

  • i think that the AC-130 gunship beats it, but thats just my opinion, and the fact that it can fire 3 different guns, 2 pretty fast rapid-fire.

  • @awesomedude2142, the F-22 and AC-130 are used for different purposes and arn't even in the same type of category, both planes however are very well designed

  • Man 3:00 thats freaking epic right there..

  • I would rather hear the Engines than the music!

  • LoL, I feel sorry for any poor soul that comes up against this plane.

  • erm its 12 years behind F35

  • strykerxo

    could you please re-post the video without the sound track? a lot of us would prefer to hear the aircraft itself, and not someone elses taste in music.

  • I would love to if I could. YouTube took the original down because I had the Red Hot Chilli Peppers and replaced with this song.

  • @FuriousVigor im not a very big creed fan either but i thought this song went gud with the video and montage.

  • sorry can't repost, but check out part 2

  • us makes money selling them

  • @qatexic us doesnt sell them

  • U.S Dosent export the F22 Raptor, your thinking of the F35 JSAF

  • @socomsniper784 its a canceled project

    whitch makes it a failed project. turns out being invisable to radar just means not much when a missle can hear ,see and smell.

  • @qatexic nope, canceled

  • JSF wins

  • Baddest fighter ever, and no need for them. What a waste of my money. The next "baddest" fighter ever will be a computer.

  • Your right. it is not about the airframe, anymore. It is becoming increasingly obvious that what is inside and stealth are the prime driver.

  • but its cost innefective im not sure but for every hour or ten hours of flight it takes 36 hours of repairs average still a beast fighter though :-D

  • lol the F-4 can outrun all those guys :) haha and hes the heaviest :P

  • Faster than the F22?

  • yes sir

  • Definitely not the P51 then ;-)

  • Way wrong! The F-15 holds all Fighter speed and time to climb records, and the SR-71 holds top speed and altitude records for jet powered aircraft!

  • my dad flyies one there asome

  • nice

  • check your six...hehehe

  • Neva mind 2:35 to 2:39 showed it was a P51

  • oops I meant the WWII fighter that was leading the pack .... what kind of fighter is that? Cool video THX!!

  • AWESOME shot of the 4 fighters at 3:15 on. What kind of fighter is that? P51D? We really have advanced in aeronautical warfare. The Wright brothers must be high-fiving it up somewhere.

  • awesome, i hope to b a pilot one dya myself! =D

  • Schweeeet!

  • F-22 surely is the creme of modern fighters, but this is just our unclassified stuff that we use for general purpose. We got some alien shit in a bunker somewhere that'll smack this around like a toy.

    Mig who?

  • Check out "Russian Super Jet"

  • hahahahaha like thats real..listen the US has way more military dollars to spend on innovation and is 20-40 years ahead of anything it has public lol

  • Russians build cheap shotty copies, they can't even beat the F-15 yet! F-15's combat record against all aircraft in actual battle is 109 to 0 loses!

  • what about the new t-50 they have? is that any good?

  • @jgtheman84

    no one knows they havent reviled much

  • @jgtheman84 They been working on it for years...they don't have the money to make it...they only got a prototype that looks like a F15...I dont think that plane will be produced by russians anytime soon...its just their usual propaganda to make it seem like they still matter since the cold war, even tho their millitary has been in the dump since the mid 80s.

  • Nice video and thanks for the upload.

    Couldn't help but LOL when the music started. "Weathered" is quite ironic since that is the Raptor's nemesis and was focal in funding debate...

  • max moga is the shit  the f22 is the best fighter in the world we can pay for it because were rich

  • Things a piece of junk. They are way to expensive and they have crashed during test flight many time. russian sukoi's much better. Garbage.

  • well done, the a10 seemed outta place

  • sick vid man

  • i want this!

  • im engish and to admit the f22 is awesome is hard the typhoon is awesome and f22 are around the same level

    i have to say ive seen a mig 29 ovt doing a display and a raptor and mig 29 seems faster

    the most advance plane will win and in my eyes its typoon and raptor

  • Raptor vs. Typhoon: how much does the stealth and supercruise affect your match? agreed they both are a match, but when you factor in these other charatoristics it would be a different outcome

  • @mrcarpcrew ok no offense but all the typhoon has going for it is its maneuverability. when compared to an f-22 raptor its by far way less superior, im not saying that because the raptor is american im saying that because well, the raptor is just far more superior. its extremely agile the typhoon is a little more agile tho but the raptor full afterburner would leave a typhoon behind and it has unmatched stealth technology.

  • @mrcarpcrew and it has a huge weapons payload it carries in its belly and on the fuselage, its just unmatched im sorry but it is.

  • @mrcarpcrew plus it has the most advanced computer systems that link with the satelites on the planet. but anyways all im saying is plaease dont compare the two planes unless ur comparing the agility

  • How do Russian Sukoi fighters with thrust vectoring compare to the F-22?

  • The F-22 is less agile than the Su-35. The F-22 has only 2D TV and the SU-35 has 3D multi axis. The Raptor is a little slower but can do the same manuevers, but has more control

  • they only needed F15 in the formation, thats a true ace of the US airforce

  • I agree drop the A-10 and replace with F-15 would be a much better Heritage flight

  • Wehmut Pur

  • translation please, comrade

  • check your 6))).

  • man i saw a video of the Raptor and it stalled first, then the pilot turned on the Burner and did a "backflip". It wasnt a giant loop, just a flip. X D

  • best plane in the world right there hey if anyone has HAWX for ps3 ad me Viperboy519 k kool

  • best plane?

    think again /watch?v=UHrXTJz3Ph4

  • im not watching ur vid u loser

  • lol

  • blame congress, oh well guess we gotta wait for the 6th generation...also the F 22 was built to fight terrorism not the Soviet Union, the designs of the F22. I know the SU 37 is ment mostly for dogfights, but right now, at this day and age, stealth, and long range is the real way of winning a battle. The F 22 will try to avoid a dogfight as much as possible, focusing only on stealth, and its long range missile.

  • @villalba45 WHAT?!?!?!?!?!? the F-22 IS AIR SUPERIORITY its meant for dogfights and thats it dude....

  • no it does not. The SU 30 can beat an F22 in a dogfight. The F22 avoids the dogfights and relies mostly on long range missiles. It is not manageable enough. Oh and dogfights, only account for 1/30 of all air combats.

  • @villalba45 uhh yea it is... ok first of all its common sense that any pilot wants long range missiles to avoid dogfights NO PILOT WANTS TO GO INTO A DOGFIGHT!!! its common sense dude....

  • its air superiority -yes-

    dogfights -no- Please do some research.

  • @harman443

    So what do you do when going up against other fighters with long range missiles?

  • dog fights? no. raining death on an entire city without being seen? yes. its a muscle flexing plane.. it spells out D O N O T F U C K W I T H T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S

  • One of my customers works on planes that you don't even know about. The f22 is for air to air. He says that nothing can even come close, but there is no need since no one does air to air anymore. I would trust his opinion.

  • Nothing comes close because of the F-22 superior weaponry. Has nothing to do with the fact that the SU-37 can outfly it.

  • Yeah thats the name of it.

  • Great video.Great song. There might be a jet the russians have that is better than the f-22 but there is no way they will ever beat our pilots. The pentigon told Obama we did not need the f-22. Thats why he cut them.

  • because its used for air to air and we dont do that anymore

  • if we did go air to air again it would be a tuff air war but i do think we would come out on top.

  • Obama? this was created many years ago

  • Though the weapons system of the F-22 is superior, the SU-37 will fly rings around ANY F-22. And it's more than 15 years older!

  • I totally agree with you, there is no doubt SU-37 WILL fly rings around the F22 Raptor because it has a larger turn radius.

  • You're kidding right? Watch ANY video on the SU-37 and you will see a tighter turn radius. Now include the ability to yaw during a loop in it's own length, and the F-22 cannot match that. What makes it superior is it's modern engines and weaponry.

  • And again you forget that F-22 has internal weapons so there is no external drag. It also has superior radar/avionics and stealth. Also... there are 187 raptors. and how many SU37?

  • Internal weapons bays are only for stealth capability, not for drag reduction. Who really cares how many exist?

  • I agree with you Sukois have good manuvability but they sacrifice alot for it plus its not a big diff from the F22, and F18s can yaw in circles in its lenght although it has no thrust vectoring and air show of Sukois are stripped down of alot of things

  • Yaw is in the rudder axis. Neither the F-22 or F-18 can yaw while doing a backflip or loop, the F-18 cannot do a backflip because it lacks vectored thrust.

  • I saw the F18 spinning flat out as it was free falling, it can do that.

  • This is called a flat spin and is done with ailerons.

  • Yes the F-22 CAN yaw while doing a backflip. Watch the video that I have favorited. And the internal weapons give many advantages: stealth, less drag, shorter takeoff distance, and a lower minimum speed. Stealth, extremely powerful radar, internal weapons, supercruise, integrated avionics, godly electronic warfare capabilities give the F-22 superiority over any enemy... without exception (also, the F-22 has actually been built and mass produced unlike the Su37) :)

  • I've been a fan of the F-22 since day 1.....Sad to see the future of America go down hill cause of the cost of this badass aircraft.....I'm sure with technology the way it is we can cut costs if lockheed martin or is it lockeed/boeing now??? I mean please,,,, for the good of the USA lets do it right for a change....

  • TheEnemySU37, oddly enough, i understand what you're saying.

  • You're kidding...

    Su-37 no stealth

    Su-37 is Russian

    Su-37 not modern old tech from older models

    Su-37 what 2 of em?

    Su-37 weak BVR

    Su-37 crappy radar

    How are their weapons more modern??? Russia is still living the cold war

    u don't beat an AIM-120 AMRAAM to the face

    need i say anything else???

  • of course obama canceled ti.. How Dare We make a jet that give America total air dominance! that would just be unfair! still glad you voted for obama?

  • Obama had nothing to do with it.

  • @gnsexe he's the one that cut it.....

  • yea the only thing that beats the F-22 is the F-35 but dont assume that an F-22 could never take out a F-35

  • its a damn shame they canceled this amazing jet

  • the funny thing is.. things do come close...... ever heard of the f35???!!!??? has the best wpons system in the world.. and its more fule efficent.. the f35 could take out the 22 before it even new what hit em! and your comparing a plan.. put a brit or canaidan vs american wanna know who will win??? the brit or the candian